Your submission at Articles for creation: Brahmdev Mishra (December 28)

edit
 
Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by SL93 was:  The comment the reviewer left was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.
SL93 (talk) 00:23, 28 December 2020 (UTC)Reply
 
Hello, Thaeon! Having an article declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! SL93 (talk) 00:23, 28 December 2020 (UTC)Reply

factual

edit

With citation how it can be humorous

January 2021

edit

  Please do not attack other editors. Comment on content, not on contributors. Personal attacks damage the community and deter users. Please stay cool and keep this in mind while editing. Thank you. Ashleyyoursmile! 10:35, 28 January 2021 (UTC)Reply

Articles you might like to edit, from SuggestBot

edit

SuggestBot predicts that you will enjoy editing some of these articles. Have fun!

Views/Day Quality Title Tagged with…
1,128   Political corruption (talk) Add sources
886   Republicanism in the United States (talk) Add sources
2,152   Sambo (martial art) (talk) Add sources
64   Ground fighting (talk) Add sources
242   Ranged weapon (talk) Add sources
166   Boxing glove (talk) Add sources
33   Ippon seoi nage (talk) Cleanup
62   Schwingen (talk) Cleanup
195   3x3 basketball (talk) Cleanup
469   Greco-Roman wrestling (talk) Expand
90   Stage combat (talk) Expand
13   FILA Grappling (talk) Expand
587   Cronyism (talk) Unencyclopaedic
1,801   Corruption (talk) Unencyclopaedic
1,796   Liberal democracy (talk) Unencyclopaedic
552   Criticism of democracy (talk) Merge
11   Arrow of Brahma (talk) Merge
6   Panama station (talk) Merge
285   Armlock (talk) Wikify
95   Criticism of the United States government (talk) Wikify
57   Tenjin Shin'yō-ryū (talk) Wikify
2   ABS-CBN Sports and Action Koronadal (DXAR-TV) (talk) Orphan
3   Alizaga (talk) Orphan
3   Body of Water (musical) (talk) Orphan
172   Semantic Scholar (talk) Stub
6   Over–under position (talk) Stub
24   Overhook (talk) Stub
5   Peter Martin (professor) (talk) Stub
48   Technical fall (talk) Stub
6   Transition (grappling) (talk) Stub

Note: All columns in this table are sortable, allowing you to rearrange the table so the articles most interesting to you are shown at the top. All images have mouse-over popups with more information. For more information about the columns and categories, please consult the documentation and please get in touch on SuggestBot's talk page with any questions you might have.

SuggestBot picks articles in a number of ways based on other articles you've edited, including straight text similarity, following wikilinks, and matching your editing patterns against those of other Wikipedians. It tries to recommend only articles that other Wikipedians have marked as needing work. Your contributions make Wikipedia better — thanks for helping.

If you have feedback on how to make SuggestBot better, please tell me on SuggestBot's talk page. Thanks from Nettrom (talk), SuggestBot's caretaker. -- SuggestBot (talk) 10:57, 28 January 2021 (UTC)Reply

Removed draft from talk page

edit

Hi! When working on drafts, you should work on them in either your sandbox or in the draftspace. It looks like you have a draft at Draft:Brahmdev Mishra, so you should work on and submit that for consideration. A draft on your talk page is just confusing and would be hard to pass AfC since it would also have any talk page communications on it. ReaderofthePack(formerly Tokyogirl79) (。◕‿◕。) 11:45, 28 January 2021 (UTC)Reply

Your submission at Articles for creation: Brahmdev Mishra (January 28)

edit
 
Your recent article submission has been rejected. If you have further questions, you can ask at the Articles for creation help desk or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help. The reason left by Theroadislong was: This topic is not sufficiently notable for inclusion in Wikipedia.
Theroadislong (talk) 14:18, 28 January 2021 (UTC)Reply

Talk page

edit

Hi! I left a response for you at User_talk:Ashleyyoursmile#User:Thaeon - I'll repost it here just to be on the safe side:

  • @Thaeon: The reason that it was tagged as "humorous" is because the editor declining the page believed that it was a hoax. The statement "It appears that your submission is either an attempt to be humorous rather than factual, or is an obvious hoax." is an automatic one that pops up when the hoax option is selected.
As for why they believed it a hoax, they stated that the supplied evidence did not back up the claims. For example, when I read this link it names the challenger as Paramdev Mishra rather than Brahmdev Mishra. Now this source does (when I run it through Google Translate) mention a Brahmdev Mishra in regards to the fight so this may be confusion over a name. I know that sometimes English spellings can differ when it comes to languages that use different language writing styles (ie, letter alphabet vs a symbol language like Japanese), as I've seen this happen with names from countries like Japan, Russia, and India. This is why it's very important to assume good faith - this seems to just be a case of names being written differently.
Since you are interested in India related matters, I recommend checking out WP:INDIA, a WikiProject devoted to India related matters. I'm not sure if this is a prowrestler or not, as wrestling and prowrestling are very different areas of sports, but I would also recommend checking out WP:PW, which covers topics related to prowrestling. Either group could be invaluable when it comes to sourcing - both finding and providing sourcing that Wikipedia would see as usable. (I say this because one of the sources you used is Facebook.) Hope this helps!

I hope this all helps! ReaderofthePack(formerly Tokyogirl79) (。◕‿◕。) 03:43, 29 January 2021 (UTC)Reply

Your thread has been archived

edit
 

Hi Thaeon! The thread you created at the Wikipedia:Teahouse, Please review this, has been archived because there was no discussion for a few days (usually at least two days, and sometimes four or more). You can still find the archived discussion here. If you have any additional questions that weren't answered then, please feel free to create a new thread.


The archival was done by Lowercase sigmabot III, and this notification was delivered by Muninnbot, both automated accounts. You can opt out of future notifications by placing {{bots|deny=Muninnbot}} here on your user talk page. Muninnbot (talk) 19:01, 31 January 2021 (UTC)Reply

Concern regarding Draft:Brahmdev Mishra

edit

  Hello, Thaeon. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Brahmdev Mishra, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Draft space is not an indefinite storage location for content that is not appropriate for article space.

If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion under CSD G13. If you would like to attempt to save it, you will need to improve it. You may request userfication of the content if it meets requirements.

If the deletion has already occured, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available here.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 19:02, 17 August 2021 (UTC)Reply

Your draft article, Draft:Brahmdev Mishra

edit
 

Hello, Thaeon. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Brahmdev Mishra".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been deleted. If you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz Read! Talk! 18:55, 17 September 2021 (UTC)Reply

Speedy deletion nomination of Draft:Brahmdev Mishra

edit
 

Although everyone is welcome to contribute to Wikipedia, introducing hoaxes, such as Draft:Brahmdev Mishra, is considered to be vandalism and is prohibited. If you are interested in how accurate Wikipedia is, a more constructive test method would be to try to find inaccurate statements that are already in Wikipedia—and then to correct them if possible. If you would like to make test edits, please use the sandbox. Under section G3 of the criteria for speedy deletion, the page has been nominated for deletion. Repeated vandalism may result in the loss of editing privileges.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. 🔥YesI'mOnFire🔥(ContainThisEmber?) 13:14, 27 May 2023 (UTC)Reply