User talk:TheGreatEditor024

If the talk page is blank, the talk page has been archived.

Wikipedia and copyright

Hello TheGreatEditor024! Your additions to Elmech EM 992 have been removed in whole or in part, as they appear to have added copyrighted content without evidence that the source material is in the public domain or has been released by its owner or legal agent under a suitably free and compatible copyright license—to request such a release, see Wikipedia:Requesting copyright permission. While we appreciate your contributions to Wikipedia, it's important to understand and adhere to guidelines about using information from sources to prevent copyright and plagiarism issues. Here are the key points:

• Limited quotation: You may only copy or translate a small portion of a source. Any direct quotations must be enclosed in double quotation marks (") and properly cited using an inline citation. More information is available on the non-free content page. To learn how to cite a source, see Help:Referencing for beginners.
• Paraphrasing: Beyond limited quotations, you are required to put all information in your own words. Following the source's wording too closely can lead to copyright issues and is not permitted; see Wikipedia:Close paraphrasing. Even when paraphrasing, you must still cite your sources as appropriate.
• Image use guidelines: In most scenarios, only freely licensed or public domain images may be used and these should be uploaded to our sister project, Wikimedia Commons. In some scenarios, non-freely copyrighted content can be used if they meet all ten of our non-free content criteria; Wikipedia:Plain and simple non-free content guide may help with determining a file's eligibility.
• Copyrighted material donation: If you hold the copyright to the content you want to copy, or are a legally designated agent, you may be able to license the text for publication here. Please see Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials.
• Copying and translation within Wikipedia: Wikipedia articles can be copied or translated, however they must have proper attribution in accordance with Wikipedia:Copying within Wikipedia. For translation, see Help:Translation § Licensing.

It's very important that contributors understand and follow these practices. Persistent failure to comply may result in being blocked from editing. If you have any questions or need further clarification, please ask them here on this page, or leave a message on my talk page. Thank you. — Diannaa 🍁 (talk) 02:20, 28 March 2026 (UTC)

I really didn't know that Designs topic would create an issue. Thank you for removing it TheGreatEditor024 (talk) 02:23, 28 March 2026 (UTC)

Your nomination of India at the Deaflympics has failed

Your good article nomination of the article India at the Deaflympics has failed. See the review page for more information. If or when the reviewer's feedback has been addressed, you may nominate the article again. Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of Arconning -- Arconning (talk) 14:43, 10 April 2026 (UTC)

editing my userspace

I appreciate the help you provided, even if I don’t remember where u came from - but please don’t change the structure I have it as, such as moving the infobox template and capitalizing the headings. I understand why u did and I’m not trying to be mean or assume bad faith. this is also against WP:NOBAN. — Aurora :3 • (📭|edits) 23:00, 15 April 2026 (UTC)

Well I came from Wikipedia Help desk. You said "i have a problem with {{userboxside}}" and also added "feel free to edit the page". So, I edited the page.

I am sorry if I messed up. TheGreatEditor024 (talk) 01:58, 16 April 2026 (UTC)

I capitalized the heading because it felt a bit weird. I didn't know that it was on purpose. TheGreatEditor024 (talk) 02:01, 16 April 2026 (UTC)

Sorry, I guess I tried to improve the wrong infobox. No wonder, you got confused. I did mess up. TheGreatEditor024 (talk) 03:35, 16 April 2026 (UTC)

oh. i linked which page i wanted help with, but maybe u didn’t see that. maybe i should’ve put it in the comment itself rather than the title.

thats on me as well a bit, since im autistic. that may make me say or put things in an unconventional way. i was making sure u knew the guidelines, but it appears it was just a misunderstanding. that’s goofy.

no bad blood at all! 😁 — Aurora :3 • (📭|edits) 05:45, 16 April 2026 (UTC)

Nope, It's my fault. I didn't see the link. TheGreatEditor024 (talk) 06:16, 16 April 2026 (UTC)

I’m not the best person to help with this specific userbox. Also, just a note that some of the wording on your page may come across as offensive to others, so you might want to review it in line with Wikipedia’s guidelines on user pages. Another editor at the Help Desk should be able to assist further. TheGreatEditor024 (talk) 03:48, 16 April 2026 (UTC)

no, no you didn’t mess up! i wouldn’t put it like that.

which sentence(s) makes u feel that way? — Aurora :3 • (📭|edits) 05:38, 16 April 2026 (UTC)

Your references. You wrote

1. Christianity is the biggest religion in the world, with over 2B adherents. alongside Islam, they both make up of the entire world’s stupidity."

(You should know that this statement hurts almost billions of people)

Btw are you anti-communist or anti-capitalist. you wrote both lol TheGreatEditor024 (talk) 06:19, 16 April 2026 (UTC)

well, that’s what i believe but i hid it.

im both anti-communist and anti-capitalist. — Aurora :3 • (📭|edits) 03:12, 18 April 2026 (UTC)

I would advice that it would be great if you removed Anti-Islam, Anti-Christian and Anti-Judaism from your infobox :religious views. TheGreatEditor024 (talk) 06:23, 16 April 2026 (UTC)

@Tonkarooson I'm inclined to agree here (I spotted this discussion when I happened to pop in to TGE's talk page.) Wikipedia is not a soapbox for anybody's political or religious ideologies; and we're all really better off if we don't talk about such things at all. There is no need for any of us to know where you stand on such issues. We're all here to build an encyclopedia, which by its very nature requires we leave our ideologies and biases at the door (as much as such a thing is possible). It's an "I [won't] show you mine if you [won't] show me yours" sort of thing. (This obviously doesn't apply to your statement of support for queer rights; human rights aren't, or rather shouldn't be, a political issue.) Athanelar (talk) 17:02, 17 April 2026 (UTC)

ok that’s fine. there’s also WP:UPYES. is the stuff on my main userspace fine?

i want to keep it but i’ll hide it. — Aurora :3 • (📭|edits) 03:02, 18 April 2026 (UTC)

More relevant is WP:UPNOT which says there is broad agreement that you may not include in your user space material that is likely... to give widespread offense which stating that something like 4 billion people "make up the entire world's stupidity" certainly is (even if, as I have a hunch is the case, Wikipedia's editor-base generally trends toward atheism)

I would also say you're leaning a bit towards excessive personal information unrelated to Wikipedia per WP:USERBIO. I'm not going to unilaterally tell you you should trim any of it, but I would just like to gently point you in the direction of WP:NOTSOCIALMEDIA; user pages... should be used primarily to present information relevant to work on the encyclopedia. Limited autobiographical information is allowed, but user pages do not serve as personal webpages,

Like a lot of younger queer editors I've seen around, you seem to be mostly using your userpage like you would use a Carrd link in your twitter bio. This is appropriate to some extent (we definitely need to know your preferred pronouns so we can interact with you respectfully, of course) but things like your eye colour and a list of philosophies you subscribe to are leaning toward being out of scope. There's nothing specific I could tell you to remove in order to fix it, because it's more of an evident philosophical approach to the way you're approaching the concept of a userpage. Athanelar (talk) 12:45, 18 April 2026 (UTC)

yes, of course. I apologize for this. I’ll work on it now. — Aurora :3 • (📭|edits) 22:45, 19 April 2026 (UTC)

wait. lemme just make sure here. which should i exactly get rid of? i think it’ll be the religious part, right? — Aurora :3 • (📭|edits) 22:47, 19 April 2026 (UTC)

Like I said, There's nothing specific I could tell you to remove in order to fix it, because it's more of an evident philosophical approach to the way you're approaching the concept of a userpage. I don't think it's as simple as 'remove X and Y and it'll be better,' that's why I just wanted to give you some general pointers as to what the purpose of a userpage here is supposed to be. Athanelar (talk) 23:09, 19 April 2026 (UTC)

i read the project page before.

👍 — Aurora :3 • (📭|edits) 01:24, 20 April 2026 (UTC)

first of all, i’m not trying to offend anyone - attack the argument, not the person.

i didnt exactly think wp:soap applied there but i guess it does. i kept it so i can put it somewhere else. until then, i’ll fully remove it. i’d rather not make it a big deal. i messed up, i apologize for that, i just wanted to share my opinions. — Aurora :3 • (📭|edits) 03:17, 18 April 2026 (UTC)

On sockpuppets

Please don't announce to users that they've been reported to WP:SPI. There's no need for them to know. If the check comes out positive, then they get blocked as a sock and that's done; if the check comes out negative, then they never know they were under suspicion. In the best case scenario where the user is innocent, then you'll distress them by implying they're in some kind of trouble. If the user is guilty, then you might let them know someone is 'on their scent' and prompt them to abandon the account and try evading their block with other accounts (which a checkuser should be able to check anyway, but in any case there's no reason to tip them off.)

There is a reason why SPI does not mandate that we inform people they've been reported, unlike ANI. There's generally no need, nor nothing to be gained, from users 'responding' on their SPI. Athanelar (talk) 16:57, 17 April 2026 (UTC)

I am sorry, I was just trying to help, but I shouldn’t have said that directly. I'll handle it properly next time TheGreatEditor024 (talk) 17:04, 17 April 2026 (UTC)

Don't worry about it, I totally understand, I just wanted to make you aware for the future! You might want to read the relevant essays WP:BEANS and WP:DENY, which are both about limiting the kinds of information or interaction we have with [potentially] problematic editors. Athanelar (talk) 17:06, 17 April 2026 (UTC)

Well, I am new to discussions other than WP:Teahouse, So i kinda messed up. btw, I'll make sure that I'll read the links you posted. TheGreatEditor024 (talk) 17:09, 17 April 2026 (UTC)

Your nomination of Wonsan Kalma Coastal Tourist Area is under review

Your good article nomination of the article Wonsan Kalma Coastal Tourist Area is under review. See the review page for more information. This may take up to 7 days; feel free to contact the reviewer with any questions you might have. Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of Dragonhawk12 -- Dragonhawk12 (talk) 20:06, 17 April 2026 (UTC)

CS1 error on Pala, Kerala

Hello, I'm Qwerfjkl (bot). I have automatically detected that this edit performed by you, on the page Pala, Kerala, may have introduced referencing errors. They are as follows:

• A generic name error. References show this error when author or editor name parameters use place-holder names. Please edit the article to include the source's actual author or editor name. (Fix | Ask for help)

Please check this page and fix the errors highlighted. If you think this is a false positive, you can report it to my operator. Thanks, Qwerfjkl (bot) (talk) 18:01, 19 April 2026 (UTC)

Welcome ...

story · music · places

... welcome to WP:QAI and thank you for improving article quality in April! -- Gerda Arendt (talk) 16:38, 20 April 2026 (UTC)

Thanks TheGreatEditor024 (talk) 17:49, 20 April 2026 (UTC)

Today's story is about one of three bios I brought to today's main page: look and listen, an extraordinary woman in many respects. --Gerda Arendt (talk) 20:19, 30 April 2026 (UTC)

Sure TheGreatEditor024 (talk) 13:25, 1 May 2026 (UTC)

Your nomination of Wonsan Kalma Coastal Tourist Area is on hold

Your good article nomination of the article Wonsan Kalma Coastal Tourist Area has been placed on hold, as the article needs some changes. See the talk page for more information. If these are addressed within seven days, the nomination will pass; otherwise, it may fail. Dragonhawk12 (talk) (Guestbook) (Wikicats) 06:44, 21 April 2026 (UTC)

Your nomination of Wonsan Kalma Coastal Tourist Area is on hold

Your good article nomination of the article Wonsan Kalma Coastal Tourist Area has been placed on hold, as the article needs some changes. See the review page for more information. If these are addressed within 7 days, the nomination will pass; otherwise, it may fail. Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of Dragonhawk12 -- Dragonhawk12 (talk) 06:46, 21 April 2026 (UTC)

Your nomination of Wonsan Kalma Coastal Tourist Area has passed

Your good article nomination of the article Wonsan Kalma Coastal Tourist Area has passed; congratulations! See the review page for more information. If the article is eligible to appear in the "Did you know" section of the Main Page, you can nominate it within the next seven days. Please also consider reviewing somebody else's nomination to help keep the backlog down. Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of Dragonhawk12 -- Dragonhawk12 (talk) 17:26, 21 April 2026 (UTC)

Wikilove!

Dragonhawk12 has given you a kitten! Kittens promote WikiLove and hopefully this one has made your day better. Your kitten must be fed three times a day and will be your faithful companion forever! Spread the WikiLove by giving someone else a kitten, whether it be someone you have had disagreements with in the past or a good friend.

Spread the goodness of kittens by adding {{subst:Kitten}} to someone's talk page with a friendly message, or kittynap their kitten with {{subst:Kittynap}}.

Congrats to getting Wonsan Kalma Coastal Tourist Area to Good Article status! I know from your wikipage that you like lions, so this is the closest template I've got. Keep up the good work! Dragonhawk12 (talk) (Guestbook) (Wikicats) 17:37, 21 April 2026 (UTC)

Thank you TheGreatEditor024 (talk) 17:38, 21 April 2026 (UTC)

Pending changes reviewer granted

Hello. Your account has been granted the "pending changes reviewer" userright, allowing you to review other users' edits on pages protected by pending changes. The list of articles awaiting review is located at Special:PendingChanges, while the list of articles that have pending changes protection turned on is located at Special:StablePages.

Being granted reviewer rights neither grants you status nor changes how you can edit articles. If you do not want this user right, you may ask any administrator to remove it for you at any time.

See also:

• Wikipedia:Reviewing pending changes, the guideline on reviewing
• Wikipedia:Reviewing pending changes#Requirements to accept an edit, when to accept an edit
  

* Pppery * _{it has begun...} 19:37, 21 April 2026 (UTC)

Thank you @Pppery TheGreatEditor024 (talk) 02:58, 22 April 2026 (UTC)

DYK nomination of Wonsan Kalma Coastal Tourist Area

Hello! Your submission of Wonsan Kalma Coastal Tourist Area at the Did You Know nominations page has been reviewed, and some issues with it may need to be clarified. Please review the comment(s) at your nomination's entry and respond there at your earliest convenience. Thank you for contributing to Did You Know! CMD (talk) 06:03, 22 April 2026 (UTC)

I have corrected the mistakes TheGreatEditor024 (talk) 06:31, 22 April 2026 (UTC)

Your thread has been archived

Hello TheGreatEditor024! The thread you created at the Teahouse, 19 April 2026, has been archived because there was no discussion for a few days. You can still read the archived discussion. If you have follow-up questions, please . See also the help page about the archival process. The archival was done by lowercase sigmabot III, and this notification was delivered by KiranBOT, both automated accounts. You can opt out of future notifications by placing {{bots|deny=KiranBOT}} on top of the current page (your user talk page). —KiranBOT (talk) 03:09, 23 April 2026 (UTC)

Nomination of Ukrainian liberation movement (1920–1950) for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Ukrainian liberation movement (1920–1950) is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article is being discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Ukrainian liberation movement (1920–1950) until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the AfD notice from the article until the discussion is closed.

Joko2468 (talk) 09:09, 2 May 2026 (UTC)

Reviving of Deaflympics WikiProject

Hi and I am so sorry for the late response with regards to your query on Deaflympics. I regret to inform you that I am not much active in Wikipedia these days and I am busy with the work commitments. I am also facing indefinite ban from editing Wikipedia as well since February 2025. I have decided to shift my focus into other stuff. I did have a passion and vision on creating as many Wikipedia articles related to Deaflympics as I realised that the coverage on Deaflympic athletes in Wikipedia was comparatively lesser than the coverage about Olympic and Paralympic athletes. I made the initiative on my own to contribute from my end to write up articles related to Deaflympics. My interest in Deaflympics began in 2017 and I had created over 100 biographical articles about Deaflympic athletes. Unfortunately, there is a lack of awareness on Deaflympics at a broader level due to lack of interest among common audience and also due to lack of broadcasting rights on Deaflympics.

One thing I can tell you that I remember on how hard it was to convince the fellow Wikipedia editors in order push some high profile Deaflympic events on the front cover page of Wikipedia's ITN section. My nominations on both 2019 Winter Deaflympics and 2025 Summer Deaflympics are documentary proof for that. If you can look at the comments under my failed ITN nominations under Wikipedia:In_the_news/Candidates/December_2019#(Closed)_2019_Winter_Deaflympics and Wikipedia:In_the_news/Candidates/November_2025#2025_Summer_Deaflympics, you can understand how people were not much bothered to search about or give prominence for these kind of multi-sport events. I also understood that many Wikipedians did not have much idea about what Deaflympics really was and the lack of media coverage on Deaflympics also played a pivotal role. I am glad that at least you are trying to take up this stiff challenge and hope you can find success. Don't give up hope on this and I hope that I can try to support you in this despite my current editing restrictions. I would love to once again contribute to Wikipedia editing, but only time will tell. Abishe (talk) 08:02, 3 May 2026 (UTC)

Well, I noticed it too. So, I also stopped giving importance to the WikiProject. TheGreatEditor024 (talk) 08:22, 3 May 2026 (UTC)

WP:DENY

It's worth a read. ScottishFinnishRadish (talk) 12:08, 5 May 2026 (UTC)

Why, Can you explain. TheGreatEditor024 (talk) 12:22, 5 May 2026 (UTC)

Don't go to an LTA's talk page and talk to them. ScottishFinnishRadish (talk) 12:25, 5 May 2026 (UTC)

Okay, well he was using rude words, so I thought it would be great if he stopped using them. TheGreatEditor024 (talk) 12:26, 5 May 2026 (UTC)

Anyway, thanks, I'll definitely check it out. TheGreatEditor024 (talk) 12:27, 5 May 2026 (UTC)

Removal of mainspace to draft redirects

Hello there, this isn't a big issue, but I noticed something. When you moved the Adv Owais Pechkar article back to the draft space, you forgot to leave a speedy deletion tag on the left over redirect. it's not a big issue and only took a second to fix, but it's one of those things that people sometimes forget to do, so I wanted to let you know. Happy editing - Pyrrhic victor (talk) 13:05, 13 May 2026 (UTC)

Thanks bro. I'll do it next time. TheGreatEditor024 (talk) 13:06, 13 May 2026 (UTC)

Your nomination of Sheep farming in Ukraine is under review

Your good article nomination of the article Sheep farming in Ukraine is under review. See the review page for more information. This may take up to 7 days; feel free to contact the reviewer with any questions you might have. Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of AirshipJungleman29 -- AirshipJungleman29 (talk) 23:25, 13 May 2026 (UTC)

Your nomination of Sheep farming in Ukraine has failed

Your good article nomination of the article Sheep farming in Ukraine has failed. See the review page for more information. If or when the reviewer's feedback has been addressed, you may nominate the article again. Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of AirshipJungleman29 -- AirshipJungleman29 (talk) 23:45, 13 May 2026 (UTC)

DYK for Sheep farming in Ukraine

On 14 May 2026, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article Sheep farming in Ukraine, which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was ... that sheep farming in Ukraine declined from 6.4 million sheep in 1938 to about 0.7 million in the early 21st century? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Sheep farming in Ukraine. You are welcome to check how many pageviews the nominated article or articles got while on the front page (here's how, Sheep farming in Ukraine), and the hook may be added to the statistics page after its run on the Main Page has completed. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to nominate it.

 — Amakuru (talk) 00:02, 14 May 2026 (UTC)

story · music · places

Thank you for a good one, and for improving article quality in May! - Today: Felicity Lott. If you have little time, just give me a click ;) - If you have more, see her story. If you have more, listen to her singing Friendly Vision. If you have more, listen until she sings the word "peace" (Frieden), floating up high, serenely. --Gerda Arendt (talk) 14:15, 20 May 2026 (UTC)

June 2026 GAN Backlog Drive

Good article nominations | June 2026 Backlog Drive
June 2026 Backlog Drive: Do you want to become more experienced in the GA process? On 1 June, a one-month backlog drive for good article nominations will begin. Barnstars will be awarded based on the number of articles reviewed. Mentors are available, and new reviewers (<6 reviews) get bonus points! Interested in taking part? You can sign up here.
Other ways to participate: Join the conversations on our talk page.
You're receiving this message because you have participated in a good article review this year or participated in the previous backlog drive.

MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 21:59, 25 May 2026 (UTC)

DYK nomination of Sheep farming in Ukraine

Hello! Your submission of Sheep farming in Ukraine at the Did You Know nominations page has been reviewed, and some issues with it may need to be clarified. Please review the comment(s) at your nomination's entry and respond there at your earliest convenience. Thank you for contributing to Did You Know!  — Chris Woodrich (talk) 23:22, 30 May 2026 (UTC)

Can you check the nomination TheGreatEditor024 (talk) 03:27, 31 May 2026 (UTC)

Your thread has been archived

Hello TheGreatEditor024! The thread you created at the Teahouse, Help, has been archived because there was no discussion for a few days. You can still read the archived discussion. If you have follow-up questions, please . See also the help page about the archival process. The archival was done by lowercase sigmabot III, and this notification was delivered by KiranBOT, both automated accounts. You can opt out of future notifications by placing {{bots|deny=KiranBOT}} on top of the current page (your user talk page). —KiranBOT (talk) 03:04, 1 June 2026 (UTC)

Reminder

When you revert vandalism, you need to warn the editor in question. Otherwise, it's hard for them to understand why their edit was reverted. --TheAuroraBorealis (she/they | In solidarity) 21:34, 1 June 2026 (UTC)

Did you mean the Russian empire guy. TheGreatEditor024 (talk) 21:42, 1 June 2026 (UTC)

Waldemar Haffkine TheGreatEditor024 (talk) 21:43, 1 June 2026 (UTC)

Yes I meant them. Regardless of their intentions, it is always a good idea to warn them. --TheAuroraBorealis (she/they | In solidarity) 21:48, 1 June 2026 (UTC)

Well, even though Haffkine was ethnically Ukrainian, he was born in the Russian Empire. TheGreatEditor024 (talk) 21:50, 1 June 2026 (UTC)

been following this too, it may also be productive to have a chat with the other user on their talk page to avoid further edit warring, even if the edits are pending revision InRRainbows Lets chat! 21:49, 1 June 2026 (UTC)

Well, I am going to tell that user. TheGreatEditor024 (talk) 21:51, 1 June 2026 (UTC)

good! there has also been previous discussion of this exact issue on the talk page, which may be helpful for explaining why we use certain standards on wikipedia :) InRRainbows Lets chat! 21:52, 1 June 2026 (UTC)

I'd see that before rejecting it. TheGreatEditor024 (talk) 21:54, 1 June 2026 (UTC)

i figured! just think it would be constructive for the other user to see if they understand that this is not some kind of personal issue, but rather one with precedent. thanks for starting the discussion InRRainbows Lets chat! 21:55, 1 June 2026 (UTC)

👍 TheGreatEditor024 (talk) 21:56, 1 June 2026 (UTC)

Women in Red

Hi there, TheGreatEditor024, and welcome to Women in Red. It's good to see you intend to help us improve Wikipedia's coverage of women. When writing women's biographies, you'll find some useful tips in our Ten Simple Rules. Please let me know if you run into any difficulties or need assistance. Happy editing!--Ipigott (talk) 09:46, 2 June 2026 (UTC)

New page reviewer granted

Hi TheGreatEditor024, I just wanted to let you know that I have added the new page reviewer user right to your account. This means you now have access to the page curation tools and can start patrolling pages from the new pages feed. If you asked for this at requests for permissions, please check back there to see if your access is time-limited or if there are other comments.

This is a good time to re-acquaint yourself with the guidance at Wikipedia:New pages patrol. Before you get started, please take the time to:

• Add Wikipedia talk:New pages patrol/Reviewers to your watchlist to follow NPP-related discussions
• If you use Twinkle, configure it to log your CSDs and PRODs
• If you can read any languages other than English, add yourself to the list of reviewers with language proficiencies

You can find a list of other useful links and tools for patrollers at Wikipedia:New pages patrol/Resources. If you are ever unsure what to do, ask your fellow patrollers or just leave the page for someone else to review – you're not alone! _signed, Rosguill ^talk 00:28, 5 June 2026 (UTC)

I wanted to say that I won't be active a lot this month as I am joining a new university and I am moving from my state to another one. I kinda forgot about it when I posted the request. Sorry. TheGreatEditor024 (talk) 06:22, 5 June 2026 (UTC)

ColanXP moved to draftspace

Thanks for your contributions to ColanXP. Unfortunately, I do not think it is ready for publishing as a live article at this time because it needs more sources to establish notability and reliable sources to properly support the content. I have converted it to a draft which you can improve, undisturbed for a while.

Please see more information at Help:Unreviewed new page. When the article is ready for publication, please click on the "Submit the draft for review!" button at the top of the page OR move the page back. DoubleGrazing (talk) 13:43, 5 June 2026 (UTC)

I guess you are mistaken. The only contribution I did was adding an orphan tag to the article (draft).TheGreatEditor024 (talk) 13:47, 5 June 2026 (UTC)

Are you using Twinkle to tag pages? -- DoubleGrazing (talk) 13:52, 5 June 2026 (UTC)

Nope, I use Special:NewPagesFeed. TheGreatEditor024 (talk) 13:54, 5 June 2026 (UTC)

No, I mean how do you apply the template? Do you do it manually by editing the source, or do you use some sort of tool like Twinkle? I'm trying to understand the work flow that resulted in you marking this ColanXP article as patrolled. -- DoubleGrazing (talk) 13:56, 5 June 2026 (UTC)

manually using {{uncategorized}} and {{orphan}} TheGreatEditor024 (talk) 13:57, 5 June 2026 (UTC)

And having manually applied the template, did you then click the review button (Y) on the Page Curation toolbar? -- DoubleGrazing (talk) 14:05, 5 June 2026 (UTC)

Yes TheGreatEditor024 (talk) 14:06, 5 June 2026 (UTC)

And did you think the article was ready for the main space? -- DoubleGrazing (talk) 14:09, 5 June 2026 (UTC)

Well, I felt like it was not ready, but I thought that other editors make see it as a stub, so I just reviewed it. well, I really need some confidence. TheGreatEditor024 (talk) 14:14, 5 June 2026 (UTC)

I guess I have to read WP:BOLD again TheGreatEditor024 (talk) 14:14, 5 June 2026 (UTC)

It isn't a stub. And even if it were, that wouldn't matter: stubs are subject to the exact same notability and verifiability requirements as any other article.

This article cites 3x Twitter/X and 1x blog. None of these are reliable sources. What's more, the vast majority of the information is completely unreferenced. And because of this, there is also no evidence at all that the subject is in any way notable. For these reasons, the article is emphatically not ready to be published.

New Page Patrol is an important job and comes with great responsibility. It is the last line of defence, before a new article gets released to public consumption (and also becomes available to search engines). Once NPP has signed off an article, no other quality control is applied. Therefore NPP should only approve articles that are ready to be approved. By clicking on the review button, that is you saying this article is 'good to go', and that removes it from the NPP feed so no other reviewer will look at it. I only happened to catch this one, because that page was already on my watch list because of some previous issues I've been dealing with.

Sorry, I'm not having a go at you, I'm genuinely trying to help. It's really great that you've volunteered to work on NPP, we sure need help there (!), but please be careful with the reviewer permission, it is a powerful one. Only approve articles that you really mean to approve, and if you're not sure about anything, don't hesitate to ask (either me or any other admin or NPP'er).

Happy edi... I mean, reviewing! :) -- DoubleGrazing (talk) 14:26, 5 June 2026 (UTC)

Okay, I'll be really careful next time. tbh I though the review button was just like "I saw it". I am really sorry. TheGreatEditor024 (talk) 14:31, 5 June 2026 (UTC)

No problem, I'm sure you didn't do it on purpose. We all make mistakes (I sure do!), but that's great because that's how we learn. Like now you learned that the Y button means 'reviewed', and I learned that the hover text displayed over that button perhaps needs to be clearer. -- DoubleGrazing (talk) 14:37, 5 June 2026 (UTC)

btw I really have a doubt. Like what is that gray box with a heart a delete button, etc beside my screen when I review an article. And how to use it. TheGreatEditor024 (talk) 14:40, 5 June 2026 (UTC)

That is the Page Curation toolbar, which becomes available to you when you get the NPP permission, see Page Curation/Help which tells you in broad terms how to use it. Or if you want to learn more thoroughly (highly recommended!), you can go to New pages patrol/School and sign up for some 1:1 training. -- DoubleGrazing (talk) 14:48, 5 June 2026 (UTC)

Thank you TheGreatEditor024 (talk) 14:49, 5 June 2026 (UTC)

Pending changes acceptance

Hi, I’m wondering why you accepted this edit, made by a TA and making changes without providing a reliable source? Indeed if you look at the history, they’ve been edit warring this change for the past few days… Danners430 _{tweaks made} 09:36, 6 June 2026 (UTC)

Unaccepted. Well, I kinda messed up. Will be careful next time. Thank you for noticing it. TheGreatEditor024 (talk) 10:08, 6 June 2026 (UTC)

My IP address is blocked

Hello @Materialscientist, It seems like you have blocked my IP address, on charges that my account uses a VPN or another similar proxy service. But, I don't use them. I'd really appreciate if you could explain why you felt like that, or can you provide the source. TheGreatEditor024 (talk) 13:06, 7 June 2026 (UTC)

@Materialscientist Hey, can you respond TheGreatEditor024 (talk) 15:46, 7 June 2026 (UTC)

Unblock request and guidance

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

TheGreatEditor024 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log) • SI)

---

Request reason:

Yamla responded in the UTRS appeal that my IP address belongs to ProtonVPN, but I am not using a VPN nor any other similar proxies. I am currently accessing Wikipedia using the hostel Wi-Fi. How do I solve this issue.

Decline reason:

No longer blocked. voorts (talk/contributions) 23:47, 7 June 2026 (UTC)

---

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

TheGreatEditor024 (talk) 16:49, 7 June 2026 (UTC)

I can edit now TheGreatEditor024 (talk) 17:41, 7 June 2026 (UTC)

Scent of Time move

Hello. It appears you attempted to move Scent of Time (TV Series 2023) to draftspace, but instead moved the page Scent of Time. I'm not entirely sure what happened here. I'm guessing you moved a redirect instead of the actual article? --Gert7 (talk · contribs) 20:32, 7 June 2026 (UTC)

Well, I moved the page Scent of Time because it contained many issues. TheGreatEditor024 (talk) 03:43, 8 June 2026 (UTC)

Unblock request and guidance

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

TheGreatEditor024 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log) • SI)

---

Request reason:

Caught by a web host block but this host or IP is not a web host. I am currently using the hostel Wi-Fi, I don't understand why I can't edit when I am using my hostel Wi-Fi, but I can edit normally when I am using mobile data. TheGreatEditor024 (talk) 11:22, 12 June 2026 (UTC)

Decline reason:

You don't give the IP address involved, but the hostel is probably using a webhost or proxy for its internet access. It is not permitted to edit via a webhost/proxy(though merely reading Wikipedia is not affected). You'll need to keep using your mobile data to edit. 331dot (talk) 15:02, 12 June 2026 (UTC)

---

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Okay TheGreatEditor024 (talk) 12:11, 13 June 2026 (UTC)

The Signpost: 21 June 2026

• From the editors: Ways for beginners to support The Signpost community journalism
  Pointing the way to your contribution to The Signpost!

• News and notes: Community Tech development team disbanded
  And English Wikipedia reaches a milestone in number of highly active editors.

• Disinformation report: PR for the people?
  Or, "PR using PR for PR"?

• Recent research: Proposed tagging system for AI involvement; successful and unsuccessful AI tools for contributors
  And other new research publications.

• In the media: Who won a 14th century battle and who won the 2026 Iran war?
  Media take issue with portrayals of recent and medieval history on Wikipedia. Plus a team supporting Wikipedians gets dissolved, and a few other things.

• Community view: Putting the Wish into the Wishlist
  A history of the Wikimedia community's request process to Foundation developers.

• In focus: A global standard for Neutral Point of View
  Wikipedians are commenting on a proposed global standard for neutral point of view.

• On the bright side: Flowers, blue helmets, reefs, pride, and Juneteenth
  Nice things around the world.

• Op-ed: Breathe, Don’t Panic, there is a different story about Wikimedia + AI futures
  We can build a strategy about AI that doesn't just center on readers; there are still plenty of humans to write the encyclopedia and work on diverse global knowledge.

• Opinion: Wikimedia Foundation staff develop union and Wikimedia user community reacts
  Why should editors support the Wiki Workers United union drive? Lessons the Wikimedia movement can learn from other labor struggles.

• Technology report: Community Tech team is disbanded, controversy erupts
  WMF disbands Community Tech, sparking community backlash over the future of the Wishlist and concerns about unionization.

• Traffic report: 'Cause this is thriller, thriller night
  Horror movies and Michael Jackson dominate theaters in the lead-up to the World Cup.

• WikiConference report: Report of Volunteer Supporters Network Annual Meeting 2026
  Outreach staff of Wikimedia chapters host a global discussion.

• Comix: Take your turn
  In a maze of twisty little edits, all alike.

• Humour: Group of banned T-shirt makers comes out of hiding to sell new Wikipedia-themed merchandise
  It ain't WikiProject United Nations, but you will find some PUNs.

* Read this Signpost in full * Single-page * Unsubscribe * MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 03:19, 21 June 2026 (UTC)

June music

Thank you for improving article quality in June! -- Gerda Arendt (talk) 14:19, 21 June 2026 (UTC)

A barnstar for you!!!

	A barnstar for you!
	Thank you for being part of the fight against vandalism on English Wikipedia, and being one of the top five most active pending changes reviewers in the last 30 days. Your hard work is very much appreciated, please keep it up. – Destinyokhiria (talk / cont) 01:25, 25 June 2026 (UTC)

Thank you so much TheGreatEditor024 (talk) 06:19, 25 June 2026 (UTC)

Didn't expect a barnstar btw, well its my first time reviewing. TheGreatEditor024 (talk) 06:22, 25 June 2026 (UTC)

Upcoming expiry of your patroller right

Hi, this is an automated reminder as part of Global reminder bot to let you know that your permission "patroller" (New page reviewers) will expire on 00:00, 4 July 2026 (UTC). For most rights, you will need to renew at WP:PERM, unless you have been told otherwise when your right was approved. To opt out of user right expiry notifications, add yourself to m:Global reminder bot/Exclusion. Leaderbot (talk) 19:41, 27 June 2026 (UTC)

Women in Red in July 2026

Women in Red | July 2026, Vol 12, Issue 7, Nos 358, 359, 376, 377 Events: New: Crime & law | Alphabet run: Countries starting with M Continuing (year-long initiatives): #1day1woman | Sports Announcements, tips, participation... Announcements from other communities: Women in Red celebrates its 11 Year Anniversary on July 18! Eiffel women Developing Countries WikiContest Tip of the month: Working on a group of linked articles? Have you thought about creating a navigation box for the footer of those pages? Other ways to participate: Become a member. You can always opt-out of notifications. Join the conversations on our talkpage. Help us plan future events and add any general ideas on developing the project. Follow us on social media: Instagram & Pinterest

--MSGJ (talk 22:16, 28 June 2026 (UTC) via MassMessaging

The Signpost: 13 July 2026

• News and notes: An exclusive club
  Wikipedia Co-Founder Larry Sanger gets a community ban for canvassing.

• In the media: Battle for a soul – who won?
  Commissars, winners and losers, blocks or bans, a Wiki red card, social engineering on wikis, and Swift action!

• Opinion: We need to innovate with Wikimedia decision-making
  Rules we can actually read, trust and change!

• Recent research: LLMs and NPOV, 20 years of user blocks, Esperanto and Volapük Wikipedias
  And other research findings.

• News from Diff: How to host Wikicurious in your own community
  The Wikicurious team shares their approach to Wiki-event organizing.

• Community view: CUNY Newmark Wikimedian-in-Residence Quarterly Brief – April to June 2026
  Quarterly update on the activities of the City University of New York's Wikimedian-in-Residence, Richard Knipel.

• Special report: Wikipedia escapes Category 1 designation under the UK Online Safety Act – for now
  A possible future recategorization by the UK Government remains an existential threat to Wikipedia.

• On the bright side: Fatherhood, weather, and diplomacy
  Father's Day, Canada Day, and the 250th anniversary of the United States Declaration of Independence.

• Op-ed: A Layup Easy Proposal for Wikimedia at 25: Spend 25% of Donations on the Community
  If strategy priority 1.1 is supporting the community, can we not increase the support to the community? Increasing grantmaking to 25% of the budget would be a move toward equality in the movement.

• Traffic report: The grass was greener, the light was brighter
  We reached the dizzy heights of that dreamed of World Cup.

• Comix: schnozzed
  on lollerskates

* Read this Signpost in full * Single-page * Unsubscribe * MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 07:25, 13 July 2026 (UTC)

Articles for Creation backlog drive

Hello TheGreatEditor024:

WikiProject Articles for creation is holding a month long Backlog Drive in August!
The goal of this drive is to reduce the backlog of unreviewed drafts to less than a month of outstanding reviews from the current 3+ months. Bonus points will be given for reviewing drafts that have been waiting more than 30 days. The drive is running from 1 August 2026 through 31 August 2026.

You may find Category:AfC pending submissions by age or other categories and sorting helpful.

Barnstars will be given out as awards at the end of the drive.
There is a backlog of over 5000 pages, so start reviewing drafts. We're looking forward to your help! MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:38, 19 July 2026 (UTC)

• If you wish to opt-out of future mailings, please remove yourself from the mailing list or alternatively to opt-out of all massmessage mailings, you may add Category:Wikipedians who opt out of message delivery to your user talk page.

Re: Jazz - Pending Change Review of a suggested inclusion for a link to Mike Danzi

Ciao TheGreatEditor024 - Glad to learn of your interest in the Wikiproject International relations, Wikiproject Biography and the review of pending changes on semi-protected articles. If you have some extra time, perhaps you could take a look at a suggested link to the musician Mike Danzi in the early development of American Jazz as an international language of peace in Europe during World War II for the article Jazz. For details see the link to the talk page here . Thanks in advance for your kind assistance and HAPPY EDITING in the future!" Courtesy ping: TheGreatEditor024~2026-42040-19 (talk) 16:11, 28 July 2026 (UTC)NHPL ~2026-42040-19 (talk) 16:11, 28 July 2026 (UTC)

Hello @~2026-42040-19, Mike Danzi can be added to the Beginnings of European jazz section as Danzi has lived in Germany for more than 14 years and has collaborated with other European jazz artists such as playing with Bernard Etté, Harry Revel, Erno Rapee and Dajos Béla. I'll add him to the section. TheGreatEditor024 (talk) 17:19, 28 July 2026 (UTC)

Ciao TheGreatEditor024 --Many thanks for the prompt assistance -- it is greatly appreciated. Enjoy the jazz and Happy Editing! With best wishes ~2026-42040-19 (talk) 17:55, 28 July 2026 (UTC)NHPL

Concern regarding Draft:Samuel Chang Jae-on

Hello, TheGreatEditor024. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Samuel Chang Jae-on, a page you created, has not been edited in at least five months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 21:06, 30 July 2026 (UTC)

Women in Red – August 2026

Women in Red | August 2026, Vol 12, Issue 8, Nos 358, 359, 378, 379, 380 Events: New: Alphabet run: Countries starting with N and O | Indigenous women | Women born before 1900 Continuing (year-long initiatives): #1day1woman | Sports More ... Announcements: On 25 July, at Wikimania Paris, Women in Red was named the Coolest Project! Tip of the month: Read the essay Determining Native American and Indigenous Canadian identities to understand the criteria for a woman's status as Native American or Indigenous Canadian. Other ways to participate: Become a member. You can always opt-out of notifications. Join the conversations on our talkpage. Help us plan future events and add any general ideas on developing the project. Follow us on social media: Instagram & Pinterest

--Chocmilk03 (talk 21:45, 30 July 2026 (UTC) via MassMessaging

Concern regarding Draft:Ukraine at the Deaflympics

Hello, TheGreatEditor024. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Ukraine at the Deaflympics, a page you created, has not been edited in at least five months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 18:06, 31 July 2026 (UTC)

Concern regarding Draft:Embassy of Poland, Seoul

Hello, TheGreatEditor024. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Embassy of Poland, Seoul, a page you created, has not been edited in at least five months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 19:06, 31 July 2026 (UTC)

The Signpost: 2 August 2026

• In the media: Union drive, most prolific editor make headlines
  AI's impact on Wikipedia, World Cup editing, and encyclopedia's place in public life.

• News and notes: Foundation rejects voluntary recognition of union, proposed board eligibility rules sharply restrict candidates
  Further: harassment allegations at Wikimania, and new RfC for Abstract Wikipedia.

• WikiConference: "Kurier, Signpost, wikipress: You can be a Wikimedia journalist" - Wikimania presentation by User:Noé Recap
  A recap of Noé Gasparini's Wikimania 2026 presentation on the variety of wikipress outlets

• In focus: Is Larry Sanger the co-founder of Wikipedia?
  A look over the years.

• Arbitration report: Think, and not just about content
  ArbCom continues business.

• News from Diff: Meet the Wikimedians of the Year 2026!
  Wikimedians of the Year 2026 announced at Wikimania 2026 - Paris

• On the bright side: The beautiful game
  2026 Men's FIFA World Cup, Wikimania music, and wikipress.

• Traffic report: Odyssey and Oyarzabal
  To take you in the sun to (Ithaca), to show you the World Cup, it's the time of the season for editing!

• Comix: Well-spotted
  You dasherdly—dash–dash−dash-dash!

* Read this Signpost in full * Single-page * Unsubscribe * MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 10:16, 2 August 2026 (UTC)

Concern regarding Draft:List of Deaflympic medalists for India

Hello, TheGreatEditor024. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:List of Deaflympic medalists for India, a page you created, has not been edited in at least five months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 15:06, 9 August 2026 (UTC)

Good article nominations RfC

Hi TheGreatEditor024,

There is an ongoing Request for Comment (RfC) at Wikipedia:Good article nominations/August 2026 RfC, which you may be interested in because in the past year, you have nominated or reviewed more than one good article nomination. This message has also been sent to all subscribers to the Good Article Gazette. The RfC contains many proposals (33 at the time of writing), which are split into the following categories: nominators, reviewers, reviews, volunteer roles, reviewing initiatives, and others. However, you are more than welcome to add any proposals of your own that you wish to put to the community.

By the end of September, all the proposals will have been closed by an uninvolved editor, either as a consensus for one of the options or with no consensus. At this point, editors will be invited again to develop these proposals into coherent policy and implement them.

Thank you for your contributions to the good articles project, and I look forward to your input! (in solidarity), JacobTheRox^{(talk|contributions)} 16:03, 11 August 2026 (UTC)

New page reviewer granted

Hi TheGreatEditor024, I just wanted to let you know that I have added the new page reviewer user right to your account. This means you now have access to the page curation tools and can start patrolling pages from the new pages feed. If you asked for this at requests for permissions, please check back there to see if your access is time-limited or if there are other comments.

This is a good time to re-acquaint yourself with the guidance at Wikipedia:New pages patrol. Before you get started, please take the time to:

• Add Wikipedia talk:New pages patrol/Reviewers to your watchlist to follow NPP-related discussions
• If you use Twinkle, configure it to log your CSDs and PRODs
• If you can read any languages other than English, add yourself to the list of reviewers with language proficiencies

You can find a list of other useful links and tools for patrollers at Wikipedia:New pages patrol/Resources. If you are ever unsure what to do, ask your fellow patrollers or just leave the page for someone else to review – you're not alone! _signed, Rosguill ^talk 19:00, 11 August 2026 (UTC)

WP:NPPHOUR

Hello. Please wait at least an hour after the last edit on a page to draftify it, as per WP:NPPHOUR. However, Suzanne M. McEnroe should not have been draftified anyways, since the subject meets WP:NACADEMIC by being a member of multiple scholarly societies and the recipient of a prestigious academic award for her work. Thank you, JTtheOG (talk) 23:01, 11 August 2026 (UTC)

I agree that Suzanne meets WP:NACADEMIC, after all, she won the William Gilbert Award. But the creator of the article has not provided sources to prove her notability for inclusion to mainspace. TheGreatEditor024 (talk) 08:19, 12 August 2026 (UTC)

I guess I can improve the article a bit to help the creator by adding more sources. TheGreatEditor024 (talk) 08:22, 12 August 2026 (UTC)

WP:NPPHOUR should have been followed at Draft:Sony Vizha as well. -MPGuy2824 (talk) 12:38, 17 August 2026 (UTC)

@MPGuy2824, It didn't even have a single citation. So, I moved it to draftspace so that the creator can improve their draft for future inclusion to Wikipedia. TheGreatEditor024 (talk) 12:40, 17 August 2026 (UTC)

That doesn't matter since it was in the first hour of creation. Not following that standard is considered as being WP:BITEY. If you notice in the NPP Feed (Special:NewPagesFeed) too there is a warning label for every page created in the last hour ("This page was only created X minutes ago. Please don't rush to tag pages at the front of the queue. The author may still be working on it.") Such things are looked at when NPR rights come up for renewing. In fact, during your trial period I suggest that you not look at such new articles at all. Happy reviewing! -MPGuy2824 (talk) 05:17, 18 August 2026 (UTC)

Okay, Thank you for explaining it. Well, I believed that moving an article to draftspace helps the creator to improve the article without posting it on the mainspace. I will be careful next time. TheGreatEditor024 (talk) 08:41, 18 August 2026 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Bimyō (August 17)

Draft declined

Thank you for contributing to Wikipedia. Your draft submission to Articles for creation has been reviewed but not accepted at this time.

Feedback

The reviewer, Dafootballguy, left the following feedback:

This draft is not written from a neutral point of view. Wikipedia articles must be written neutrally in a formal, impersonal, and dispassionate way. They should not read like a blog post, advertisement, or fan page. Rewrite the draft to remove:

• promotional language: see Words to watch;
• personal commentary: opinions or direct addresses to the reader;
• informal language.

Instead, only summarize in your own words a range of independent, reliable, published sources that discuss the subject.

Next steps

• Edit Draft:Bimyō to address the points above, making sure to publish any changes.
• When you are ready to resubmit your draft for review, click the Resubmit button.
• If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it may be deleted.

Need help?

• For an overview of our policies and guidelines see Everything you need to know.
• You can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, or on the reviewer's talk page.

Scam warning

• If anyone asks you for money or payment to publish, protect, or restore a Wikipedia article or draft, it is a scam. Learn about scams on Wikipedia.

In solidarity, Dafootballguy [Want to talk?] 23:37, 17 August 2026 (UTC)

@Dafootballguy, Bimyo is not my article. The actual author of the article is User:Dora Megan. My only contribution to the subject is moving the article to draft space as it did not meet Wikipedia's notability criteria and was not written in a neutral point of view. TheGreatEditor024 (talk) 03:41, 18 August 2026 (UTC)

August thanks

story · music · places

Thank you for improving article quality in August! - Cute story today ;) -- Gerda Arendt (talk) 20:05, 20 August 2026 (UTC)

The Signpost: 24 August 2026

• News and notes: Union process progresses, unanswered questions about Littler Mendelson remain
  And Raju Narisetti leaves WMF board after nine years.

• In the media: Wikipedia editors save Sam Altman's life
  Can AI do that? Meanwhile, Ruwiki gives porn the shaft, and has Grokipedia ghosted?

• Recent research: Women in blue? Wikipedia's gender gap reverses in some areas
  And other new research findings.

• Discussion report: Again and Again
  The community comes to consensus.

• Traffic report: Look out, here comes the Spider-Man!
  Plus The Odyssey and varied topics caught in his web.

• Humour: Her tastes, her Wikimania, her upcoming tour... Baby Globe reveals everything
  A short (parody) interview with Baby Globe via the French wikipress outlet, Regards sur l’Actualité du mouvement Wikimédia (RAW).

• On the bright side: The great outdoors
  Blue Angels, Indigenous Peoples' Day, and the Perseids meteor shower.

• Opinion: Are we embarrassed yet?
  One editor wants to find out more about a Department of Justice investigation of Wikipedia and its editors.

• Special report: Paris Syndrome: Labor Strife, AI Anxiety, and a Leadership Test at Wikimania 2026
  Notes from a delightful Wikimania and the ugly week that followed.

• Comix: WP:FAOWN
  "Explaining civilly" probably should go both ways...

* Read this Signpost in full * Single-page * Unsubscribe * MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 01:22, 24 August 2026 (UTC)