Thebluescreen
Possibly unfree File:Cepa logo color.JPG
edit
A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Cepa logo color.JPG, has been listed at Wikipedia:Possibly unfree files because its copyright status is unclear or disputed. If the file's copyright status cannot be verified, it may be deleted. You may find more information on the file description page. You are welcome to add comments to its entry at the discussion if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. -- Skier Dude ► 05:00, 9 November 2009 (UTC)
Logo belongs to associtaion i work for and I was authorised to use it. how shall I proceed now and how can i prove it?
Possibly unfree File:Cepa logo color1.JPG
edit
A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Cepa logo color1.JPG, has been listed at Wikipedia:Possibly unfree files because its copyright status is unclear or disputed. If the file's copyright status cannot be verified, it may be deleted. You may find more information on the file description page. You are welcome to add comments to its entry at the discussion if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. -- Skier Dude ► 05:00, 9 November 2009 (UTC)
Possibly unfree File:Cepa logo color1.JPG
editLogo belongs to associtaion i work for and I was authorised to use it. how shall I proceed now?
A tag has been placed on File:Antonia Tomkova, Managing Director of CEPA.JPG requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section F1 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the image is an unused redundant copy (all pixels the same or scaled down) of an image in the same file format, which is on Wikipedia (not on Commons), and all inward links have been updated.
If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. ww2censor (talk) 05:18, 9 November 2009 (UTC)
- Thank you for helping to build Wikipedia.
- I'm sorry, but this has been deleted as meeting WP:CSD. You may want to carefully review Wikipedia:Your first article.
- For basic information on beginning to write an article see User:Dloh/new.
- For more general information about the deletion process, please see User:Dlohcierekim/deletion
- If you believe the subject does in fact meet notability guidelines with reliable sources providing verifiable information, please contact me on my talk page.
- If you wish to make test edits or work on the article before creating it, you can create a test page at User:Thebluescreen/test and consider using the Article Wizard.
- Cheers, and happy editing. Dlohcierekim 05:21, 22 November 2009 (UTC)
Speedy deletion nomination of Dagmar grossmann
edit A tag has been placed on Dagmar grossmann requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a person or group of people, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable, as well as our subject-specific notability guideline for biographies. You may also wish to consider using a Wizard to help you create articles - see the Article Wizard.
If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Lastly, please note that if the page does get deleted, you can contact one of these admins to request that they userfy the page or have a copy emailed to you. Eeekster (talk) 10:51, 26 November 2009 (UTC)
November 2009
edit
Please stop removing speedy deletion notices from pages that you have created yourself, as you did with Dagmar grossmann. If you continue, you will be blocked from editing Wikipedia. Eeekster (talk) 11:04, 26 November 2009 (UTC)
This is the last warning you will receive for your disruptive edits.
The next time you remove a speedy deletion notice from a page you have created yourself, as you did with Dagmar grossmann, you will be blocked from editing Wikipedia. Eeekster (talk) 11:09, 26 November 2009 (UTC)
The article CEPA (Central Europe Private Aviation) has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:
- no assertion of notability
While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.
You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{dated prod}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.
Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{dated prod}} will stop the Proposed Deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. The Speedy Deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and Articles for Deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Ironholds (talk) 15:28, 27 November 2009 (UTC)
Speedy deletion nomination of CEPA (Central Europe Private Aviation)
edit A tag has been placed on CEPA (Central Europe Private Aviation) requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G12 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be a blatant copyright infringement. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material, and as a consequence, your addition will most likely be deleted. You may use external websites as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences. This part is crucial: say it in your own words.
If the external website belongs to you, and you want to allow Wikipedia to use the text — which means allowing other people to modify it — then you must verify that externally by one of the processes explained at Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials. If you are not the owner of the external website but have permission from that owner, see Wikipedia:Requesting copyright permission. You might want to look at Wikipedia's policies and guidelines for more details, or ask a question here.
If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Road Wizard (talk) 19:39, 4 December 2009 (UTC)
Final warning
editYou've already been given a final warning above about your disruptive edits to Dagmar grossmann. Wikipedia is not a promotional platform, and even notable CEOs must provide references in reliable *independent* sources to establish notability. (I.e, not company literature.) Removing legitimate tags questioning notability suggests you have a conflict-of-interest with the subject. You can change your site to allow Wiki to use copyrighted material by following these guidelines [1]
If you don't respond, and if you continue disruptive edits, you will immediately find you are blocked from editing. Piano non troppo (talk) 21:43, 4 December 2009 (UTC)
Hello,
are the external links i have put on the Dagmar grossmann page ok? They appeared in well-known business aviation media. To be honest the guidelines of wikipedia are very comlicated, you want to check something and it directs you to hundreds of pages and the explanations are not very clear.
Please, let me know if the links are ok as there is not enough info about business aviation in general and I miss this info in wikipedia. i am Czech and therefore I write about Czech operator and i can assure you that people around me have interest to read about it.
The same problem is with CEPA (Central Europe Private Aviation). It is newly established business aviation association and therefore there are not many sources about it, but it exists!So where is the problem of putting an info about it? This info makes wikipedia up to date and the only hing i am facing is that someone always delete the info I add.
Sona
Orphaned non-free image File:Citation mustang flying.JPG
edit
Thanks for uploading File:Citation mustang flying.JPG. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).
If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of "file" pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. ZooFari 03:10, 14 December 2009 (UTC)
Possibly unfree File:LOGO OF CEPA.JPG
edit
A file that you uploaded or altered, File:LOGO OF CEPA.JPG, has been listed at Wikipedia:Possibly unfree files because its copyright status is unclear or disputed. If the file's copyright status cannot be verified, it may be deleted. You may find more information on the file description page. You are welcome to add comments to its entry at the discussion if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. --Skier Dude (talk) 07:28, 20 December 2009 (UTC)
Possibly unfree File:Legacy 600.pdf
editA file that you uploaded or altered, File:Legacy 600.pdf, has been listed at Wikipedia:Possibly unfree files because its copyright status is unclear or disputed. If the file's copyright status cannot be verified, it may be deleted. You may find more information on the file description page. You are welcome to add comments to its entry at the discussion if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. --Skier Dude (talk 07:39, 8 September 2010 (UTC)
Possibly unfree File:Citation mustang.pdf
editA file that you uploaded or altered, File:Citation mustang.pdf, has been listed at Wikipedia:Possibly unfree files because its copyright status is unclear or disputed. If the file's copyright status cannot be verified, it may be deleted. You may find more information on the file description page. You are welcome to add comments to its entry at the discussion if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. --Skier Dude (talk 07:41, 8 September 2010 (UTC)
Possibly unfree File:Hawker900xp.pdf
editA file that you uploaded or altered, File:Hawker900xp.pdf, has been listed at Wikipedia:Possibly unfree files because its copyright status is unclear or disputed. If the file's copyright status cannot be verified, it may be deleted. You may find more information on the file description page. You are welcome to add comments to its entry at the discussion if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. --Skier Dude (talk 07:41, 8 September 2010 (UTC)
Possibly unfree File:Cepa logo color small.JPG
edit
A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Cepa logo color small.JPG, has been listed at Wikipedia:Possibly unfree files because its copyright status is unclear or disputed. If the file's copyright status cannot be verified, it may be deleted. You may find more information on the file description page. You are welcome to add comments to its entry at the discussion if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. --Skier Dude (talk 07:42, 8 September 2010 (UTC)
Possibly unfree File:Cepa logo.jpg
edit
A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Cepa logo.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Possibly unfree files because its copyright status is unclear or disputed. If the file's copyright status cannot be verified, it may be deleted. You may find more information on the file description page. You are welcome to add comments to its entry at the discussion if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. --Skier Dude (talk 07:43, 8 September 2010 (UTC)
Possibly unfree File:Cepa logo CEPA.JPG
edit
A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Cepa logo CEPA.JPG, has been listed at Wikipedia:Possibly unfree files because its copyright status is unclear or disputed. If the file's copyright status cannot be verified, it may be deleted. You may find more information on the file description page. You are welcome to add comments to its entry at the discussion if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. --Skier Dude (talk 07:43, 8 September 2010 (UTC)
Possibly unfree File:Cover 28.jpg
edit
A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Cover 28.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Possibly unfree files because its copyright status is unclear or disputed. If the file's copyright status cannot be verified, it may be deleted. You may find more information on the file description page. You are welcome to add comments to its entry at the discussion if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. --Skier Dude (talk 07:43, 8 September 2010 (UTC)
December 2010
edit
Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at Wellness Rooseveltova, you may be blocked from editing. Invitrovanitas (talk) 14:08, 2 December 2010 (UTC)
Speedy deletion nomination of File:Legacy Interior.JPG
edit
A tag has been placed on File:Legacy Interior.JPG requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section F9 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the image appears to be a blatant copyright infringement. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted images or text borrowed from other web sites or printed material, and as a consequence, your addition will most likely be deleted. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.
If you think that the page was nominated in error, contest the nomination by clicking on the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion" in the speedy deletion tag. Doing so will take you to the talk page where you can explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. You can also visit the page's talk page directly to give your reasons, but be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but do not hesitate to add information that is consistent with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. -- ТимофейЛееСуда. 01:52, 27 April 2012 (UTC)
File:India - DG compresssed.JPG missing description details
edit
If the information is not provided, the image may eventually be proposed for deletion, a situation which is not desirable, and which can easily be avoided.
If you have any questions please see Help:Image page. Thank you. Sfan00 IMG (talk) 00:22, 29 March 2013 (UTC)
The file File:India - DG compresssed.JPG has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:
Unused personal photo. Out of scope.
While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.
You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated files}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the file's talk page.
Please consider addressing the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated files}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and files for discussion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. --Minorax«¦talk¦» 10:38, 5 February 2022 (UTC)
File source problem with File:Dagmar Grossmann.jpg
edit
Thank you for uploading File:Dagmar Grossmann.jpg. I noticed that the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you did not create this file yourself, you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, please add a link to the page from which it was taken, together with a brief restatement of the website's terms of use of its content. If the original copyright holder is a party unaffiliated with the website, that author should also be credited. Please add this information by editing the image description page.
If the necessary information is not added within the next seven days, the image will be deleted. If the file is already gone, you can still make a request for undeletion and ask for a chance to fix the problem.
Please refer to the image use policy to learn what images you can or cannot upload on Wikipedia. Please also check any other files you have uploaded to make sure they are correctly tagged. Here is a list of your uploads. If you have any questions or are in need of assistance please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. mattbr 13:53, 29 July 2023 (UTC)
The file File:Jaroslav Malinsky Member of Board.JPG has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:
Uploaded for CEPA (Central Europe Private Aviation). No other use.
While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.
You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated files}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the file's talk page.
Please consider addressing the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated files}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and files for discussion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. --Minorax«¦talk¦» 06:19, 24 December 2023 (UTC)
The file File:Chairman and Founder of CEPA Dagmar Grossmann.JPG has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:
Uploaded for CEPA (Central Europe Private Aviation). No other use.
While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.
You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated files}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the file's talk page.
Please consider addressing the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated files}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and files for discussion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. --Minorax«¦talk¦» 06:19, 24 December 2023 (UTC)
The file File:Antonia Tomkova Managing Director of CEPA.JPG has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:
Uploaded for CEPA (Central Europe Private Aviation). No other use.
While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.
You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated files}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the file's talk page.
Please consider addressing the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated files}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and files for discussion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. --Minorax«¦talk¦» 06:20, 24 December 2023 (UTC)
