Thedude061899
|
April 2015
editPlease do not add commentary or your own personal analysis to Wikipedia articles, as you did to Edmonton Oilers. Doing so violates Wikipedia's neutral point of view policy and breaches the formal tone expected in an encyclopedia. Thank you. -- Gogo Dodo (talk) 04:34, 12 April 2015 (UTC)
Please stop adding unsourced content, as you did to Montreal Canadiens. This contravenes Wikipedia's policy on verifiability. If you continue to do so, you may be blocked from editing Wikipedia. NeilN talk to me 04:48, 12 April 2015 (UTC)
Hello and welcome to Wikipedia. When you add content to talk pages and Wikipedia pages that have open discussion (but never when editing articles), please be sure to sign your posts. There are two ways to do this. Either:
- Add four tildes ( ~~~~ ) at the end of your comment; or
- With the cursor positioned at the end of your comment, click on the signature button ( or ) located above the edit window.
This will automatically insert a signature with your username or IP address and the time you posted the comment. This information is necessary to allow other editors to easily see who wrote what and when.
Thank you. NeilN talk to me 05:53, 12 April 2015 (UTC)
Thedude061899, you are invited to the Teahouse!
editHi Thedude061899! Thanks for contributing to Wikipedia. Be our guest at the Teahouse! The Teahouse is a friendly space where new editors can ask questions about contributing to Wikipedia and get help from peers and experienced editors. I hope to see you there! Soni (I'm a Teahouse host) This message was delivered automatically by your robot friend, HostBot (talk) 17:21, 12 April 2015 (UTC) |
January 2017
editHello, and welcome to Wikipedia. This is a message letting you know that one or more of your recent edits to Patrik Laine has been undone by an automated computer program called ClueBot NG.
- ClueBot NG makes very few mistakes, but it does happen. If you believe the change you made was constructive, please read about it, report it here, remove this message from your talk page, and then make the edit again.
- For help, take a look at the introduction.
- The following is the log entry regarding this message: Patrik Laine was changed by Thedude061899 (u) (t) ANN scored at 0.964728 on 2017-01-08T08:49:21+00:00 .
Thank you. ClueBot NG (talk) 08:49, 8 January 2017 (UTC)
October 2018
edit{{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}
. -- ferret (talk) 13:26, 24 October 2018 (UTC)Thedude061899 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))
Request reason:
As i said when i was blocked earlier tonight, I was drunk aand screwing around, an admin had already unblocked me. I dont see why I was blocked again
Decline reason:
Being drunk is no excuse. It's also not the case that an admin unblocked you. Your block log is publicly visible here and shows no unblock at this time. Yamla (talk) 14:14, 24 October 2018 (UTC)
If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.
{{Unblock on hold | 1=Ferret | 2= I understand that, I messed up. I apologize, i need to be more responsible. It wont happen again. also maybe Wikipedia was just glitching out because the ban notice disappeared at the top of my profile for a bit, I misunderstood that as the ban being removed. again sorry for being irresponsible and for the inconvenience it has created. | 3 = AGK ■ 22:44, 31 October 2018 (UTC)}}
- @AGK: This block was in response to an AIV report and at the time all edits (since roughly 2015, with almost no edits until the Oct 2018 spree) appeared unconstructive. I'm fine with an unblock if you're satisfied with the user's apology and promises. -- ferret (talk) 23:29, 31 October 2018 (UTC)
Thedude061899 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))
Request reason:
I understand that, I messed up. I apologize, i need to be more responsible. It wont happen again. also maybe Wikipedia was just glitching out because the ban notice disappeared at the top of my profile for a bit, I misunderstood that as the ban being removed. again sorry for being irresponsible and for the inconvenience it has created.
Accept reason:
Your account has been unblocked. If you edit disruptively in future, you may be re-blocked without warning and with further requests unlikely to be considered. AGK ■ 15:25, 2 November 2018 (UTC)
Unblock discussion
editWhat constructive edits might you make? Please give as much detail as you can. Because frankly, I could not find any constructive edits in your edit contribs, and I am disinclined to unblock.-- Dlohcierekim (talk) 14:52, 24 October 2018 (UTC)
You will, of course, need to affirm that you will lay off the sauce while editing. -- Dlohcierekim (talk) 14:52, 24 October 2018 (UTC)
I plan on keeping stats and what not updated on hockey pages, specifically pertaining to the Montreal Canadiens. And yes I can confirm I will lay off of the sauce whilst editing articles on this website. Like I said before, it was just a drunk joke inspired by seeing similar things done to make fun of hockey players. My apologies. Thedude061899 (talk) 08:50, 30 October 2018 (UTC)
- [random irrelevant editor] Well I suppose no matter how bad the vandalism was, it's still gotta be better than doing something stupid in real life like driving, not that it (the vandalism) can be excused. 58.96.198.88 (talk) 10:48, 30 October 2018 (UTC)