Welcome to Wikipedia!!!

edit
Hello Tommarsh99! Welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. If you decide that you need help, check out Wikipedia:Where to ask a question, ask me on my talk page, or place {{helpme}} on your talk page and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Please remember to sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. Below are some recommended guidelines to facilitate your involvement. Happy Editing! Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| talk 01:30, 30 November 2009 (UTC)Reply
Getting Started
Getting your info out there
Getting more Wikipedia rules
Getting Help
Getting along
Getting technical
 

November 2009

edit

  Your recent edit to the page Billie Jean appears to have added incorrect information and has been reverted or removed. All information in this encyclopedia must be verifiable in a reliable, published source. If you believe the information that you added was correct, please cite the references or sources or before making the changes, discuss them on the article's talk page. Please use the sandbox for any other tests that you wish to make. Do take a look at the welcome page if you would like to learn more about contributing to our encyclopedia. Thank you. NeilN talkcontribs 13:16, 24 November 2009 (UTC)Reply

edit
 

Hello. Concerning your contribution, File:Great+Britain+v+Poland+Davis+Cup+Day+One+mE7MUr9Y90kl.jpg, please note that Wikipedia cannot accept copyrighted text or images obtained from other web sites or printed material, without the permission of the author(s). This article or image appears to be a direct copy from http://www.zimbio.com/pictures/7HWvd3hggSq/Great+Britain+v+Poland+Davis+Cup+Day+One/mE7MUr9Y90k/Jerzy+Janowicz. As a copyright violation, File:Great+Britain+v+Poland+Davis+Cup+Day+One+mE7MUr9Y90kl.jpg appears to qualify for deletion under the speedy deletion criteria. File:Great+Britain+v+Poland+Davis+Cup+Day+One+mE7MUr9Y90kl.jpg has been tagged for deletion, and may have been deleted by the time you see this message.

If you believe that the article or image is not a copyright violation, or if you have permission from the copyright holder to release the content freely under the Creative Commons Attribution/Share-Alike License (CC-BY-SA) then you should do one of the following:

However, for textual content, you may simply consider rewriting the content in your own words. While we appreciate contributions, we must require all contributors to understand and comply with our copyright policy. Wikipedia takes copyright concerns very seriously, and persistent violators will be blocked from editing. Thank you. MilborneOne (talk) 21:08, 29 November 2009 (UTC)Reply

Speedy deletion nomination of Connor wells

edit
 

A tag has been placed on Connor wells requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a person or group of people, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable, as well as our subject-specific notability guideline for biographies. You may also wish to consider using a Wizard to help you create articles - see the Article Wizard.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Lastly, please note that if the page does get deleted, you can contact one of these admins to request that they userfy the page or have a copy emailed to you. MuffledThud (talk) 09:45, 25 February 2010 (UTC)Reply

ATP World Tour Tournaments

edit

These are the Tournaments on the ATP World Tour for 2010:

Others:

Barclays ATP World Tour Finals;   ; Hard(Indoor)

World Team Championships;   ; Clay

Grand Slams:

Australian Open;   ; Hard

Roland Garros;   ; Clay

The Championships, Wimbledon;   ; Grass

US Open- a USTA Event;   ; Hard


ATP Masters 1000:

W&S Financial Group Masters; Cincinnati OH ;   ; Hard

BNP Paribas Open ; Indian Wells ;   ; Hard

Mutua Madrilena Madrid Open, Madrid ;   ; Clay

Sony Ericsson Open ; Miami;   ; Hard

Monte-Carlo Rolex Masters; Monte Carlo;   ; Clay

BNP Paribas Masters ; Paris;   ; Hard(Indoor)

Internazionali BNL D'Italia; Rome ,   ; Clay

Shanghai Rolex Masters ; Shanghai;   ; Hard

Rogers Cup ; Montreal ;   ; Hard

ATP 500:

Abierto Mexicano Telcel; Acapulco;   ; Clay

Barcelona Open Banco Sabadel; Barcelona;   ; Clay

Davidoff Swiss Indoors; Basel ;   ; Hard (Indoors)

China Open ; Beiijing;   ; Hard

Barclays Dubai Tennis Championships; Dubai ;   ; Hard

International German Open ; Hamburg;   ; Clay

Regions Morgan Keegan Tennis Championships; Memphis;   ; Hard(Indoor)

ABN Amro World Tennis Tournament; Rotterdam ;   ; Hard

Japan Open ; Tokyo ;   ; Hard

Open Tenis Valencia; Valencia;   ; Hard(Indoor)

Legg Mason Tennis Classic; Washington DC ;   ; Hard

ATP 250:

Atalanta Tennis Championships; Atlanta ;   ; Hard

Heineken Open; Auckland;   ; Hard

PTT Thailand Open; Bangkok;   ; Hard

SkiStar Swedish Open; Bastad;   ; Clay

Serbia Open; Belgrade ;

Speedy deletion nomination of Laura kemp

edit
 

You may also wish to consider using a Wizard to help you create articles. See the Article Wizard.

Thank you.

A tag has been placed on Laura kemp requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done because the article, which appears to be about a real person, individual animal(s), an organization (band, club, company, etc.), or web content, does not indicate how or why the subject is notable: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, articles that do not indicate the subject's importance or significance may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable. If this is the first page that you have created, then you should read the guide to writing your first article.

If you think that you can assert the notability of the subject, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the article (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the article's talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the article meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would confirm the subject's notability under Wikipedia guidelines.

For guidelines on specific types of articles, you may want to check out our criteria for biographies, for web sites, for bands, or for companies. Feel free to leave a note on my talk page if you have any questions about this. Vejvančický (talk) 08:38, 22 April 2010 (UTC)Reply

April 2010

edit
 

Welcome to Wikipedia. Everyone is welcome to make constructive contributions to Wikipedia, but at least one of your recent edits, such as the one you made to Venus Flytrap, did not appear to be constructive and has been automatically reverted by ClueBot.

  • Please use the sandbox for any test edits you would like to make, and take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. Note that human editors do monitor recent changes to Wikipedia articles, and administrators have the ability to block users from editing if they repeatedly engage in vandalism.
  • Cluebot produces very few false positives, but it does happen. If you believe the change you made should not have been detected as unconstructive, please report it here, remove this warning from your talk page, and then make the edit again.
  • The following is the log entry regarding this warning: Venus Flytrap was changed by Tommarsh99 (u) (t) making a minor change adding "!!!" on 2010-04-22T17:17:16+00:00 . Thank you. ClueBot (talk) 17:17, 22 April 2010 (UTC)Reply

  Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did with this edit to the page Venus Flytrap. Such edits constitute vandalism and are reverted. Please do not continue to make unconstructive edits to pages; use the sandbox for testing. Thank you. Orphan Wiki 17:19, 22 April 2010 (UTC)Reply

April 2010

edit
 

Welcome to Wikipedia. Everyone is welcome to make constructive contributions to Wikipedia, but at least one of your recent edits, such as the one you made to Venus Flytrap, did not appear to be constructive and has been automatically reverted by ClueBot.

  • Please use the sandbox for any test edits you would like to make, and take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. Note that human editors do monitor recent changes to Wikipedia articles, and administrators have the ability to block users from editing if they repeatedly engage in vandalism.
  • Cluebot produces very few false positives, but it does happen. If you believe the change you made should not have been detected as unconstructive, please report it here, remove this warning from your talk page, and then make the edit again.
  • The following is the log entry regarding this warning: Venus Flytrap was changed by Tommarsh99 (u) (t) making a minor change adding "!!!" on 2010-04-26T09:28:29+00:00 . Thank you. ClueBot (talk) 09:28, 26 April 2010 (UTC)Reply

Unreferenced BLPs

edit

  Hello Tommarsh99! Thank you for your contributions. I am a bot notifying you on behalf of the the unreferenced biographies team that 1 of the articles that you created is currently tagged as an Unreferenced Biography of a Living Person. The biographies of living persons policy requires that all personal or potentially controversial information be sourced. In addition, to ensure verifiability, all biographies should be based on reliable sources. If you were to bring this article up to standards, it would greatly help us with the current 688 article backlog. Once the article is adequately referenced, please remove the {{unreferencedBLP}} tag. Here is the article:

  1. Jerzy Janowicz - Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL

Thanks!--DASHBot (talk) 05:33, 19 August 2010 (UTC)Reply

March 2012

edit
 

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. Everyone is welcome to make constructive contributions to Wikipedia, but at least one of your recent edits, such as the one you made to Maternal insult, did not appear to be constructive and has been automatically reverted (undone) by an automated computer program called ClueBot NG.

Speedy deletion nomination of Ross petty(haverhill)

edit
 

Please do not make statements attacking people or groups of people. Wikipedia has a strict policy against personal attacks. Attack pages and images are not tolerated by Wikipedia and are speedily deleted. Users who continue to create or repost such pages and images in violation of our biographies of living persons policy will be blocked from editing Wikipedia. Thank you.

If you think that the page was nominated in error, contest the nomination by clicking on the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion" in the speedy deletion tag. Doing so will take you to the talk page where you can explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. You can also visit the page's talk page directly to give your reasons, but be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but do not hesitate to add information that is consistent with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Taroaldo (talk) 09:47, 15 June 2012 (UTC)Reply

 
You have been blocked indefinitely from editing, because your account has been used virtually exclusively for vandalism, over a period of several years. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may appeal this block by adding the text {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}, but you should read the guide to appealing blocks first. JamesBWatson (talk) 10:14, 15 June 2012 (UTC)Reply