Tomsellecksdog

Welcome!

Latest comment: 7 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

Hello, Tomsellecksdog, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are a few links to pages you might find helpful:

You may also want to take the Wikipedia Adventure, an interactive tour that will help you learn the basics of editing Wikipedia. You can visit The Teahouse to ask questions or seek help.

Please remember to sign your messages on talk pages by typing four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask for help on your talk page, and a volunteer should respond shortly. Again, welcome! -🐦Do☭torWho42 (⭐) 03:23, 16 June 2017 (UTC)Reply

Proposed deletion of Ignited

Latest comment: 7 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

Hello, Tomsellecksdog. I wanted to let you know that I’m proposing an article that you started, Ignited, for deletion because I don't think it meets our criteria for inclusion. If you don't want the article deleted:

edit the page
remove the text that looks like this: {{proposed deletion/dated...}}
save the page

Also, be sure to explain why you think the article should be kept in your edit summary or on the article's talk page. If you don't do so, it may be deleted later anyway.

You can leave a note on my talk page if you have questions.

Meatsgains (talk) 23:07, 26 July 2017 (UTC)Reply

Blocked as a sockpuppet

Latest comment: 7 years ago3 comments3 people in discussion

This account has been blocked indefinitely as a sock puppet of Yobtar1 (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · page moves · block user · logs · block log · arb · rfc · lta · SPI · cuwiki) that was created to violate Wikipedia policy. Note that using multiple accounts is allowed, but using them for illegitimate reasons is not, and that all edits made while evading a block or ban may be reverted or deleted. If this account is not a sock puppet, and you would like to be unblocked, you may appeal this block by first reading the guide to appealing blocks, then adding the text {{unblock|Your reason here ~~~~}} below. Vanjagenije (talk) 19:26, 14 August 2017 (UTC)Reply

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Tomsellecksdog (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

I have researched the sockpuppet page and have not done any of the items listed. This is my only account, and contributions I have made were not part of any other users or accounts. I saw Daniel Starr and Jim Jonassen have pages deleted and decided they should be resubmitted, but I was not asked to by anyone. I also just wrote one the other day for Joanne Horowitz because she is a prominent figure. I have no relation or contact with user Yobtar1 but perhaps similar IP range? Please advise if I can provide more information to remove my block.

Decline reason:

I don't see that Daniel Starr (entrepreneur), Vince Thompson (author), and Jim Jonassen have anything in common beyond two editors (including you) and a promotional tone. The editors share the same characteristic style issues. Either the two of you are the same person, or you work as one. Makes no difference to Wikipedia. Add the technical evidence, and this is not a coincidence. Huon (talk) 21:51, 14 August 2017 (UTC)Reply

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Tomsellecksdog (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

Those three pages are similar because I happened to see them all get deleted, looked them up and thought it would be helpful to resubmit them (tone aside, I took from what Yobtar1 had submitted so page stayed similar. Did not think they included anything promotional and have no vested interest in those three pages. Thought they were three notable people (same reason I created Joanne Horowitz). If Joanne's page is deleted, and someone else decides to make one for her because she is Kevin Spacey's manager of 20 years and notable, would you flag that user as a sockpuppet for resubmitting her page? That is how I feel at this point, and thought I was doing something helpful for the site. I have no relation to the Yobtar1 user, what else do you need from me in order to rectify?

Decline reason:

Given the technical overlap, too, it's impossible to believe you have no relation to Yobtar1. Yamla (talk) 11:18, 17 August 2017 (UTC)Reply

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Add topic