User talk:TonyTheTiger/Archive 45

Archive 40

←

Archive 43

Archive 44

Archive 45

Archive 46

Archive 47

→

Archive 50

William needs you

		William Windsor needs help!
		I am trying to bring the article William Windsor (goat) up to good article status; as you previously helped, I wondered if you might have time to look at it again, and perhaps help improve it. All contributions welcome. Thank you for your time.  Chzz  ►  15:29, 1 April 2010 (UTC) (No, this is not an April Fool thing)

 ChzzBot  ►  17:06, 1 April 2010 (UTC)

scheyer

I like the NABC news, but can't find a ref. Also, can you perhaps give a hand one way or the other w/the Scheyer pix? Many thanks.--Epeefleche (talk) 21:31, 1 April 2010 (UTC)

Spam

Hi Tony, I have deleted a big spam text dump from your talk page that was placed by an Indian IP yesterday. I ordinarily wouldn't do that but this had phone numbers and stuff in it so I thought it best to remove it. Happy Friday. - Burpelson AFB (talk) 00:30, 3 April 2010 (UTC)

Template:NCAATeamSeason

Thanks for heads up about the added fields. I actually saw this earlier today as well. If MVP and Captain have been added for basketball, might as well add them for other sports, namely football, as well. I'm sure you agree.Jweiss11 (talk) 04:58, 3 April 2010 (UTC)

Jay Pritzker Pavilion TFA

Congratulations! Ruhrfisch _><>°^° 13:50, 3 April 2010 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of 2010 East–West Shrine Game

Hello, I just wanted to introduce myself and let you know I am glad to be reviewing the article 2010 East–West Shrine Game you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. –Grondemar 18:23, 3 April 2010 (UTC)

Note: I moved the article to 2010 East–West Shrine Game (with the endash) as that is the more appropriate title per WP:MOSDASH. –Grondemar 04:47, 4 April 2010 (UTC)

The article 2010 East–West Shrine Game you nominated as a good article has been placed on hold . The article is close to meeting the good article criteria, but there are some minor changes or clarifications needed to be addressed. If these are fixed within seven days, the article will pass, otherwise it will fail. See Talk:2010 East–West Shrine Game for things which need to be addressed. –Grondemar 16:49, 5 April 2010 (UTC)

Chicago bid for the 2016 Summer Olympics

I noted your interest in the article Chicago bid for the 2016 Summer Olympics, and I'm wondering if you would like to join the Olympic Bids Task Force. There is a Working Group to make Bids for the 2016 Summer Olympics a Featured topic. Best regards; Felipe Menegaz 21:23, 3 April 2010 (UTC)

Ok, it's fine! Felipe Menegaz 22:49, 3 April 2010 (UTC)

DYK

fyi ... I just created and self-nom'd this for DYK a couple of days ago, and think it would for obvious reasons be a great one to go up today, but so far no movement ... http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Template_talk:Did_you_know&action=edit&section=56

--Epeefleche (talk) 04:54, 5 April 2010 (UTC)

Consensus on Template:College Basketball Awards

I started a thread on Template talk:College Basketball Awards to see what interested editors think of my proposal. I'd like it if you commented and also alerted others who you know to be active WikiProject College Basketball contributors to also join in. Thank you. Jrcla2 (talk) 00:06, 6 April 2010 (UTC)

The Wikipedia Signpost: 5 April 2010

• News and notes: New board member, rights elections, April 1st activities, videos

• In the news: Wikipedia influences drug terminology, brief headlines

• WikiProject report: WikiProject Baseball and news roundup

• Features and admins: This week in approvals

• Arbitration report: The Report on Lengthy Litigation

• Technology report: Bugs, Repairs, and Internal Operational News

Read this Signpost in full · Single-page · Unsubscribe · EdwardsBot (talk) 03:44, 7 April 2010 (UTC)

tx ...

I've opened discussion at the college basketball page. BTW -- I've re-read CRUFT just now far enough to realize that use of the phrase "implies that the content is unimportant and that the contributor's judgment of the topic's importance is clouded by fanaticism. Thus, use of this term may be regarded as pejorative, and when used in discussion about another editor's contributions, it can sometimes be regarded as uncivil". No doubt that was not your intent, of course.--Epeefleche (talk) 05:25, 7 April 2010 (UTC)

DYK for Princeton Tigers men's lacrosse

On April 7, 2010, Did you know? was updated with a fact from the article Princeton Tigers men's lacrosse, which you created or substantially expanded. You are welcome to check how many hits your article got while on the front page (here's how, quick check ) and add it to DYKSTATS if it got over 5,000. If you know of another interesting fact from a recently created article, then please suggest it on the Did you know? talk page.

Materialscientist (talk) 12:03, 7 April 2010 (UTC)

DYK nomination of John Hummer

Hello! Your submission of John Hummer at the Did You Know nominations page has been reviewed, and there still are some issues that may need to be clarified. Please review the comment(s) underneath your nomination's entry and respond there as soon as possible. Thank you for contributing to Did You Know! Materialscientist (talk) 05:50, 8 April 2010 (UTC)

DYK for Princeton Tigers men's basketball

On April 8, 2010, Did you know? was updated with a fact from the article Princeton Tigers men's basketball, which you created or substantially expanded. You are welcome to check how many hits your article got while on the front page (here's how, quick check ) and add it to DYKSTATS if it got over 5,000. If you know of another interesting fact from a recently created article, then please suggest it on the Did you know? talk page.

Materialscientist (talk) 12:02, 8 April 2010 (UTC)

eChicago 2010

Tony--I'm working with Kate Williams on eChicago. Hoping you are still planning to pull together a panel for the conference on May 1, 10:30-11:45. See echicago@illinois.edu. Need to confirm asap.

Nkimphil (talk) 17:04, 8 April 2010 (UTC)nkimphil

Scheyer GA

Tx. I'll go for it after going for a more time-pressured GA. Aafia Siddiqui, who got 12K hits when she was convicted, will be sentenced May 6. I'm going to see if I can steer it through GA and FA in time for that (though it may not be possible -- depending how quickly people step up to do the reviews). I believe I have to wait till she is done (at lest w/the GA?) before submitting Scheyer.--Epeefleche (talk) 22:52, 8 April 2010 (UTC)

Many tx. I've listed Scheyer now -- had though in the past I was told one could only submit one at a time. Tx for correcting that. Also -- Materialscientist told me I have to go through GA first ... is he wrong? Would love to get the Siddiqui article featured in time. Tx.--Epeefleche (talk) 23:12, 8 April 2010 (UTC)

why not a good idea?

I'm fairly certain I've been told (or read) that descriptive language after year headers (following a colon) was a good idea, when I was seeking GA status for a baseball article.--Epeefleche (talk) 04:31, 9 April 2010 (UTC)

Thanks, by the way

Thanks for the shout-out in the Signpost. You gave me too much credit though: the inheritance scheme was totally your idea. (Or someone else's idea, that you repeated to me). Cheers, –xeno^talk 13:03, 9 April 2010 (UTC)

Let me add my thanks too, and thanks for the Jay Pritzker Pavilion bling, Ruhrfisch _><>°^° 20:58, 9 April 2010 (UTC)

Inauguration

I can't believe I wasn't aware of the fact that this was up for FA! Job well done. You now have a couple years rest till Jan. 2013. I daresay Obama might someday be the first featured topic that's not a TV show or hurricane ; ) Joshdboz (talk) 18:39, 9 April 2010 (UTC)

VS Fashion Show

Hey, thanks for your message. :) Nice job on those final edits addressing the concerns of the GA reviewer! —Lowellian (reply) 23:27, 9 April 2010 (UTC)

Hello, TonyTheTiger. You have new messages at TomCat4680's talk page.
You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.

Your Golden W nom

You may want to nominate yourself for the Golden W Award soon. Lampman has "preregistered," as his last main page contribution will go up May 14. He's nominating now in anticipation. I think that will become the custom, so if you want to be the first to get the award, you may want to nominate yourself now. We'll award as soon as the last required mainpage contribution goes up. ɳorɑfʈ ^Talk! 02:12, 10 April 2010 (UTC)

DYK for John Hummer

On April 10, 2010, Did you know? was updated with a fact from the article John Hummer, which you created or substantially expanded. You are welcome to check how many hits your article got while on the front page (here's how, quick check ) and add it to DYKSTATS if it got over 5,000. If you know of another interesting fact from a recently created article, then please suggest it on the Did you know? talk page.

Materialscientist (talk) 03:02, 10 April 2010 (UTC)

2010 NCAA Men's Basketball All-Americans WP:FL

Tony - Good idea thinking of this article for WP:FL. I've never been involved with this before, would it be better to have article for all the redlinked players before nominating it? I usually link them because it seems like if you are an All-American level player that denotes notability. Thoughts? Rikster2 (talk) 12:30, 10 April 2010 (UTC)

AH errors

When you finish building an articlehistory, please scroll to the bottom of the article talk page to see if the red AH error cat is lit.[1] Thanks, SandyGeorgia (Talk) 12:37, 10 April 2010 (UTC)

Help

Can you help me figure out what I'm doing wrong on this template that makes "}}" appear at the beginning of the page? Thanks in advance. ~ Richmond96 t • c 00:54, 11 April 2010 (UTC)

Trying to understand...

...why you undid my edit to the Prairie Avenue District page. I added some content that references the neighborhood watch for the area, an organization that is distinct from and unrelated to the Prairie District Neighborhood Alliance, whose reference you have allowed to exist on the page.

Saw your reply. You are mistaken. My link was to the Prairie District Neighborhood Watch, which matches the content I added. Take another look at my edit....

-Bill Van Emburg —Preceding unsigned comment added by 76.217.39.185 (talk) 04:21, 11 April 2010 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of 2009–10 Michigan Wolverines men's basketball team

The article 2009–10 Michigan Wolverines men's basketball team you nominated as a good article has been placed on hold . The article is close to meeting the good article criteria, but there are some minor changes or clarifications needed to be addressed. If these are fixed within seven days, the article will pass, otherwise it will fail. See Talk:2009–10 Michigan Wolverines men's basketball team for things which need to be addressed. –– Jezhotwells (talk) 12:26, 11 April 2010 (UTC)

Montgomery Ward & Co. Catalog House

Just FYI, I've proposed moving this article to Montgomery Ward Company Complex. The Chicago Landmark Catalog House is only one part of the property listed on the NRHP. The body of the article, which was merged from User:LurkingInChicago's page, discusses the complex as a whole, not just the Catalog House. I think the merge you made back in 2007 should have gone the other way (ie, your article should have been merged into LurkingInChicago's which was broader in scope). You can discuss the proposed move here. Zagalejo^^^ 18:41, 11 April 2010 (UTC)

Meetup

I already had some plans that day, so I don't think I'll be coming. Sorry. Zagalejo^^^ 18:57, 11 April 2010 (UTC)

Slate

You may have already been notified of this and perhaps you don't care—did you know they've been mocking you on the Slate podcast Hang Up and Listen? Good Ol’factory ^(talk) 10:31, 12 April 2010 (UTC)

Sorry, I should have included the specific episode as it is not the latest. It is the one found here. The discussion of you is near the end, when they start talking about their "LaceDariuses". Good Ol’factory ^(talk) 22:35, 12 April 2010 (UTC)

Four Award

		Four Award
		Congratulations! You have been awarded the Four Award for your work from beginning to end on McCormick Tribune Plaza & Ice Rink.

Nicely done! — Hunter Kahn 22:33, 12 April 2010 (UTC)

• Just got a conference call I HAVE to listen in on, can't finish the nom now, but will finish it within an hour or two. SOrry! — Hunter Kahn 23:00, 12 April 2010 (UTC)
  • Sorry about that. I was waiting on a call that came earlier than I expected and ran later than I thought it would. I've now listed McCormick Tribune Plaza & Ice Rink in the records, which I believe completes the nomination. Well done! — Hunter Kahn 00:25, 13 April 2010 (UTC)

The Wikipedia Signpost: 12 April 2010

• Sanger allegations: Larry Sanger accuses Wikimedia of hosting illegal images

• News and notes: Studying German flagged revisions, French library agreement, German court case

• In the news: SCOTUS hopeful edited bio, criticism from article subject

• WikiProject report: WikiProject Motorcycling

• Features and admins: Approved this week

• Arbitration report: The Report on Lengthy Litigation

Read this Signpost in full · Single-page · Unsubscribe · EdwardsBot (talk) 01:54, 15 April 2010 (UTC)

Congrats ...

on 100K. BTW, I just noticed that there is no "Illinois Mr. Basketball" template. Since you are a big Chicago fan, you might perhaps have interest in creating that one day?

Best.--Epeefleche (talk) 06:17, 15 April 2010 (UTC)

Template-bombing

I hate baseless template-bombing, which seems to be the passion of some editors. Good revert, on your part.--Epeefleche (talk) 19:13, 15 April 2010 (UTC)

Still don't understand...

My info on the Prairie District Neighborhood Watch may be self-published, but it is within the guidelines of policy, "Self-published and questionable sources as sources on themselves." If you want third party verification that we are legitimate, go to the discussions section of our Google Group and look at the statement of support from Alderman Fioretti's office.

This should not be a problem.

-Bill VE —Preceding unsigned comment added by 76.217.39.185 (talk) 20:19, 15 April 2010 (UTC)

DYK nomination of Tommy Amaker

Hello! Your submission of Tommy Amaker at the Did You Know nominations page has been reviewed, and there still are some issues that may need to be clarified. Please review the comment(s) underneath your nomination's entry and respond there as soon as possible. Thank you for contributing to Did You Know! ErinM (talk) 21:35, 15 April 2010 (UTC)

otheruses4 -> about

Please do not use {{otheruses4}}. It redirects to {{about}}.174.3.123.220 (talk) 20:12, 17 April 2010 (UTC)

Improvements to auto assessed category

Thanks to some help from the WPBannerMeta people, the automatically assessed category now has an awesome new sort feature. Check it out. Note it is still catching up so there will be some inaccuracies here and there. But it should help you to verify the assessments much more efficiently. –xeno^talk 20:20, 17 April 2010 (UTC)

I looked. What am I missing?--TonyTheTiger (T/C/BIO/WP:CHICAGO/WP:FOUR) 20:56, 17 April 2010 (UTC)

You'll see that many "B" class articles Xenobot recently identified are sorted under "4". If the tagging run had picked up an FA, FL, or GA, you would have seen them under 1,2, or 3 (respectively). See the legend at the top of the category. –xeno^talk 20:58, 17 April 2010 (UTC)

e.g. if you look now, you'll see two articles sorted under "3" for "GA". –xeno^talk 17:33, 24 April 2010 (UTC)

• FYI WP:JAZZ has me tagging their unassessed articles below 2500 bytes as "stub". Are you interested in doing something like this? –xeno^talk 18:18, 23 April 2010 (UTC)

Go for it.--TonyTheTiger (T/C/BIO/WP:CHICAGO/WP:FOUR) 19:23, 23 April 2010 (UTC)

 Task running... Let me know if you notice any issues –xeno^talk 16:55, 24 April 2010 (UTC)

bio for eChicago

Hi, Tony--could you provide me a bio for the eChicago program? I can take a few things off your talk page if you'd like. Otherwise, you can maybe put something on my talk page? 99.139.127.201 (talk) 02:10, 18 April 2010 (UTC)Nancy KP

Millenium Park

Hi Tony. I'd be happy to help develop two further FAs with you. I had intended working on the ice rink article with you but it was already an fa by the time i looked again! Dr. Blofeld ^{White cat} 09:44, 18 April 2010 (UTC)

Re:CUP

Why do you care? You hate my writing style anyway. College got in the way in the last 2 months or so. It'll be too late on May 11, but that's when my college semester ends. I have been trying to my head to be promoted to Cup judge for some time, and i have experience running one, because I took over my home project's one, and that's doing well. After May 11, albeit probably too late, I should be fine in writing more again.Mitch32^{(Growing up with Wikipedia 1 edit at a time.)} 14:16, 18 April 2010 (UTC)

WP:Hockey Navbox policy

Hello, TonyTheTiger. You have new messages at Alrin's talk page.
You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.

Hello, TonyTheTiger. You have new messages at Isaacl's talk page.
You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.

Isaac Lin (talk) 17:52, 18 April 2010 (UTC)

I hate having to do this to a regular editor who does have good article work. But if you continue referring to the hockey project as a mafia which is a huge personal attack on the editors of that project. I will have to report you to ANI since I am involved. Had I not been involved and saw your current WP:POINT arguments and personal attacks I would have blocked you. So please take this to heart and tone down your language. You are heading down a very negative road. -DJSasso (talk) 18:08, 18 April 2010 (UTC)

Thank you for taking it to heart. It is appreciated. -DJSasso (talk) 18:21, 18 April 2010 (UTC)

Honestly, I'm not even certain why you are so obsessed with this. The stance on these navboxes is abundantly clear, and I wish you would stop wasting everyone's time trying to push your viewpoint down everyone's throat. Though I did like how you called this a "controversy" when you went off spamming other projects because you aren't getting your way. One editor who wilfully refuses to get the point hardly represents a controversy. Resolute 19:56, 18 April 2010 (UTC)

Talkback

Hello, TonyTheTiger. You have new messages at Jrcla2's talk page.
You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.

Categories for discussion nomination of Category:Hollywood families

Category:Hollywood families, which you created, has been nominated for deletion, merging, or renaming. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the Categories for discussion page. Thank you.

Your GA nomination for E'Twaun Moore

I have reviewed and passed E'Twaun Moore as a Good Article. Congratulations. - AdamBMorgan (talk) 11:58, 19 April 2010 (UTC)

WP:Hockey Navbox policy

I think your list is basically accurate. There are a couple of articles that could be listed in the columns, e.g. List of first overall NHL draft picks. The hockey editors seem solidly against the use of navboxes. While they may dislike it, hockey articles do look different than other sports and that may be should be thought about. I don't think they like your viewpoint at all and are pretty close-minded about it. Should it be brought up at WP:SPORT? It would have to be cross-posted across the various sports to get a cross-section of sports project editors. ʘ alaney2k ʘ (talk) 14:56, 19 April 2010 (UTC)

I am no admin. I couldn't tell you if it goes against any policy. It will raise the ire of the hockey editors. I think they may have gone down this path before. It may be that without 90-100% consensus, the projects are left alone instead of a standard at a higher level up the topic chain. It's a topic to address at any rate. The hockey editors may have some useful points for the other projects too. After all, there are probably too many navboxes out there, specifically ones of a 'trivia' nature. ʘ alaney2k ʘ (talk) 16:03, 19 April 2010 (UTC)

Alaney -- do we know what the basis is for their viewpoint? Tx.--Epeefleche (talk) 06:37, 20 April 2010 (UTC)

The Wikipedia Signpost: 19 April 2010

• News and notes: Berlin WikiConference, Brooklyn Museum & Google.org collaborations, review backlog removed, 1 billion edits

• In the news: Study of featured article quality, Facebook's integration of Wikipedia, and more!

• WikiProject report: WikiProject Environment

• Features and admins: Approved this week

• Arbitration report: The Report on Lengthy Litigation

Read this Signpost in full · Single-page · Unsubscribe · EdwardsBot (talk) 13:07, 20 April 2010 (UTC)

DYK for Tommy Amaker

On April 21, 2010, Did you know? was updated with a fact from the article Tommy Amaker, which you created or substantially expanded. You are welcome to check how many hits the article got while on the front page (here's how, quick check ) and add it to DYKSTATS if it got over 5,000. If you know of another interesting fact from a recently created article, then please suggest it on the Did you know? talk page.

Materialscientist (talk) 00:03, 21 April 2010 (UTC)

DYK for 2009–10 Harvard Crimson men's basketball team

On April 21, 2010, Did you know? was updated with a fact from the article 2009–10 Harvard Crimson men's basketball team, which you created or substantially expanded. You are welcome to check how many hits the article got while on the front page (here's how, quick check ) and add it to DYKSTATS if it got over 5,000. If you know of another interesting fact from a recently created article, then please suggest it on the Did you know? talk page.

Materialscientist (talk) 00:03, 21 April 2010 (UTC)

Hello, TonyTheTiger. You have new messages at Speciate's talk page.
You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.

Speciate (talk) 19:04, 24 April 2010 (UTC)

2009-10 East-West Shrine Game

I see you're still working on this, but I just thought I'd let you know I'd like to close this one out one way or another by the end of the month, so that it counts for the GAN backlog elimination drive. –Grondemar 06:29, 25 April 2010 (UTC)

One last item left: could you add citations to the NFL Draft section? See the review for details. –Grondemar 11:11, 29 April 2010 (UTC)

DYK nomination of 1973–74 Buffalo Braves season

Hello! Your submission of 1973–74 Buffalo Braves season at the Did You Know nominations page has been reviewed, and there still are some issues that may need to be clarified. Please review the comment(s) underneath your nomination's entry and respond there as soon as possible. Thank you for contributing to Did You Know! Allen3 ^talk 12:05, 26 April 2010 (UTC)

DYK for Stevie Brown

Materialscientist (talk) 00:05, 27 April 2010 (UTC)

The Wikipedia Signpost: 26 April 2010

• From the team: Introducing Signpost Sidebars

• Museums conference: Wikimedians meet with museum leaders

• News and notes: Wikimedia announcements, Wikipedia advertising, and more!

• In the news: Making sausage, Jimmy Wales on TV, and more!

• Sister projects: Milestones, Openings, and Wikinews contest

• WikiProject report: WikiProject Gastropods

• Features and admins: Approved this week

• Arbitration report: The Report on Lengthy Litigation

• Technology report: Bugs, Repairs, and Internal Operational News

Read this Signpost in full · Single-page · Unsubscribe · EdwardsBot (talk) 13:31, 27 April 2010 (UTC)

Scheyer GA

Many thanks for all your help w/the Scheyer GA.--Epeefleche (talk) 18:54, 27 April 2010 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free media (File:2006_German_Sports_Illustrated_Cover.jpg)

Thanks for uploading File:2006_German_Sports_Illustrated_Cover.jpg. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'file' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. feydey (talk) 09:43, 28 April 2010 (UTC)

I have readded this as a fair use image.--TonyTheTiger (T/C/BIO/WP:CHICAGO/WP:FOUR) 14:06, 28 April 2010 (UTC)

File:2003_Swimsuit_cover.jpg

I have tagged File:2003_Swimsuit_cover.jpg as {{orphaned fairuse}}. In order for the image to be kept at Wikipedia, it must be included in at least one article. Otherwise, it will be deleted in seven days. feydey (talk) 09:49, 28 April 2010 (UTC)

DYK for 1973–74 Buffalo Braves season

-- Cirt (talk) 16:03, 28 April 2010 (UTC)

DYK nomination of Donovan Warren

Hello! Your submission of Donovan Warren at the Did You Know nominations page has been reviewed, and there still are some issues that may need to be clarified. Please review the comment(s) underneath your nomination's entry and respond there as soon as possible. Thank you for contributing to Did You Know! Jujutacular ^T · C 20:30, 28 April 2010 (UTC)

Amaker

I'll get to it either tonight or tomorrow; been immensely busy this week. Wizardman _{Operation Big Bear} 12:44, 29 April 2010 (UTC)

DYK for Grant Park Symphony Orchestra

The DYK project (nominate) 16:02, 29 April 2010 (UTC)

TfD

Seeing as to how you take an interest in this type of thing, please comment on a navbox that I put up for deletion (click here). Thanks. Jrcla2 (talk) 00:51, 30 April 2010 (UTC)

Michigan Wolverines football template

My views have changed. I think the template is a mess and needs to shortened. I also think there is a need for some level of consistency in how the team templates are done. Before we start re-configuring, I'm going to post a note on the project talk page to solicit broader input. Cbl62 (talk) 01:40, 30 April 2010 (UTC)

Re: 2009 International Bowl

Hello. You have a new message at Grondemar's talk page. –Grondemar 03:11, 30 April 2010 (UTC)

Re: WP:Four

Heya, yea, I have a few up my sleeve.

• Tropical Storm Vamei - made November 19, 2005, DYK on November 23, 2005, GA on July 28, 2006, and FA on March 24, 2008
• Tropical Storm Henri (2003) - made June 12, 2006, DYK on June 16, 2006, GA on June 16, 2006, and FA on December 6, 2006
• Hurricane Bob (1985) - made October 29, 2006, DYK on November 2, 2006, GA on November 26, 2006, and FA on August 22, 2009
• Effects of Hurricane Isabel in North Carolina - made December 16, 2006, DYK on December 21, 2006, GA on December 20, 2006, and FA on December 29, 2006
• 2000 Sri Lanka cyclone - made January 5, 2007, DYK on January 9, 2007, GA on January 18, 2007, and FA on February 17, 2007
• Cyclone Elita - made January 21, 2008, DYK on January 23, 2008, GA on February 27, 2008, and FA on April 9, 2008

And yep, I'm back, for now! Hurricanehink (talk) 03:43, 30 April 2010 (UTC)

Grant Park Music Festival GA

I have reviewed the Grant Park Music Festival article, which you nominated as a good article. is close to meeting the good article criteria, but there are some minor issues that need to be addressed. I have placed the review on hold, awaiting improvements in the next seven days. Adabow (talk) 11:01, 30 April 2010 (UTC)

DYK for Mark Ortmann (American football)

Materialscientist (talk) 16:04, 30 April 2010 (UTC)

WikiCup 2010 April newsletter

Round two is over, and we are down to our final 32. For anyone interested in the final standings (though not arranged by group) this page has been compiled. Congratulations to Hunter Kahn (submissions), our clear overall round winner, and to ThinkBlue (submissions) and Arsenikk (submissions), who were solidly second and third respectively. There were a good number of high scorers this round- competition was certainly tough! Round three begins tomorrow, but anything promoted after the end of round two is eligible for points. 16 contestants (eight pool leaders and eight wildcards) will progress to round four in two months- things are really starting to get competitive. Anything you worry may not receive the necessary attention before the end of the round (such as outstanding GA or FA nominations) is welcome at Wikipedia:WikiCup/Reviews, and please remember to continue offering reviews yourself where possible. As always, the judges are available to contact via email, IRC or their talk pages, and general discussion about the Cup is welcome on the WikiCup talk page.

Judge iMatthew has retired from Wikipedia, and we wish him the best. The competition has been ticking over well with minimal need for judge intervention, so thank you to everyone making that possible. A special thank you goes to participants Stone (submissions) and White Shadows (submissions) for their help in preparing for round three. Good luck everyone! If you wish to start receiving or stop receiving this newsletter, please feel free to add or remove yourself from Wikipedia:WikiCup/Newsletter/Send. J Milburn, Fox and The ed17 17:40, 30 April 2010 (UTC)