Tvurta

Hello, Tvurta, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions to this free encyclopedia. If you decide that you need help, check out Getting Help below, ask at the help desk, or place {{Help me}} on your talk page and ask your question there. Please remember to sign your name on talk pages by clicking or by typing four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your username and the date. Also, please do your best to always fill in the edit summary field. Below are some useful links to facilitate your involvement. Happy editing! EvergreenFir (talk) 19:35, 3 July 2018 (UTC) Getting started Introduction Contributing to Wikipedia The five pillars of Wikipedia How to edit a page Intuitive guide to Wikipedia Finding your way around Table of contents Directories and indexes Department directory Editing articles How to develop an article Simplified Manual of Style Getting help Frequently asked questions Cheatsheet Our new user help forum, the Teahouse The Help Desk, for more advanced questions Help pages Article Wizard – a Wizard to help you create articles How you can help Community Portal Join a WikiProject Follow Wikipedia etiquette Practice civility Discover what's going on in the Wikimedia community

Severus Snape additions

Hi there. Where are you getting this personal info about Severus Snape from? You've added previously unheard of family members, and "Tobias Kalovan" as his full name. Where are your sources for all this? Chaheel Riens (talk) 12:48, 11 February 2019 (UTC)

Stop adding bogus "occupations" to Voldemort Page

Please stop adding "Dictator" and "Leader of the Death Eater Insurgency" as an ocupation to Lord Voldemort's page. Neither of those is an occupation or a profession. An occupation is a activity usually performed in exchange for payment; it's a synonym for "job". Francisco Franco's job was not "dictator", and Ho Chi Minh's job wasn't "insurgency leader". A profession is a particular type of occupation based on specialized training. Magidin (talk) 17:41, 12 February 2019 (UTC)

Elizabeth Burke

Hello. Your recent edit to Elizabeth Burke appears to have added the name of a non-notable entity to a list that normally includes only notable entries. In general, a person, organization or product added to a list should have a pre-existing article before being added to most lists. If you wish to create such an article, please first confirm that the subject qualifies for a separate, stand-alone article according to Wikipedia's notability guideline. Thank you. Leschnei (talk) 18:34, 12 February 2019 (UTC)

February 2019

You currently appear to be engaged in an edit war according to the reverts you have made on Lord Voldemort; that means that you are repeatedly changing content back to how you think it should be, when you have seen that other editors disagree. Users are expected to collaborate with others, to avoid editing disruptively, and to try to reach a consensus, rather than repeatedly undoing other users' edits once it is known that there is a disagreement.

Points to note:

1. Edit warring is disruptive regardless of how many reverts you have made;
2. Do not edit war even if you believe you are right.

If you find yourself in an editing dispute, use the article's talk page to discuss controversial changes and work towards a version that represents consensus among editors. You can post a request for help at an appropriate noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, it may be appropriate to request temporary page protection. If you engage in an edit war, you may be blocked from editing.
You may not realise it and you may not mean it - but you're edit warring. Please desist and discuss. Chaheel Riens (talk) 22:24, 12 February 2019 (UTC)

Please stop adding questionable material to Lord Voldemort's infobox. See the discussion in the appropriate talk page. If you continue adding this material, you will be reported and may be blocked from editing. Magidin (talk) 18:37, 14 February 2019 (UTC)

Hello. Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia.

When editing Wikipedia, there is a field labeled "Edit summary" below the main edit box. It looks like this:

Edit summary (Briefly describe your changes)

I noticed your recent edit to Die Hard 2 does not have an edit summary. Please be sure to provide a summary of every edit you make, even if you write only the briefest of summaries. The summaries are very helpful to people browsing an article's history.

Edit summary content is visible in:

• User contributions
• Recent changes
• Watchlists
• Revision differences
• IRC channels
• Related changes
• New pages list
• Article editing history

Please use the edit summary to explain your reasoning for the edit, or a summary of what the edit changes. You can give yourself a reminder to add an edit summary by setting Preferences → Editing → Prompt me when entering a blank edit summary. Thanks! DonIago (talk) 13:59, 20 February 2019 (UTC)

Stop Edit Warring on Lord Voldemort

You continue to engage in an edit war on the Lord Voldemort page. In case you haven't clued in, the reason you keep having to edit in the stuff is because the consensus is against it and it is being removed by several editors, myself included. If you wish to make a case for those additions, please go to the talk page and make your case. This is your last warning otherwise. If you add this material again without discussion and contrary to consensus, you will be reported for edit warring. 00:24, 25 February 2019 (UTC)

March 2019

Please stop your disruptive editing.

• If you are engaged in an article content dispute with another editor, discuss the matter with the editor at their talk page, or the article's talk page, and seek consensus with them. Alternatively you can read Wikipedia's dispute resolution page, and ask for independent help at one of the relevant notice boards.
• If you are engaged in any other form of dispute that is not covered on the dispute resolution page, seek assistance at Wikipedia's Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents.

If you continue to disrupt Wikipedia, as you did at Lord Voldemort and Severus Snape, you may be blocked from editing. Chaheel Riens (talk) 12:48, 10 March 2019 (UTC)

ANI

There is currently a discussion at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. --Chaheel Riens (talk) 14:38, 11 March 2019 (UTC)

You have been blocked from editing for a period of 31h for edit-warring. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}.  User:Ymblanter (talk) 17:45, 11 March 2019 (UTC)

March 2019

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you disrupt Wikipedia, as you did at Severus Snape. Chaheel Riens (talk) 19:38, 16 March 2019 (UTC)

There is currently a discussion at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. --Chaheel Riens (talk) 23:21, 16 March 2019 (UTC)

March 2019

You have been blocked temporarily from editing for persistently adding unsourced or poorly sourced content. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}.

Do not add unreferenced information. Do not add original research. Respond to concerns expressed by other editors. Please use edit summaries. Cullen³²⁸ Let's discuss it 06:54, 17 March 2019 (UTC)

March 2019

There is currently a discussion at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. --Chaheel Riens (talk) 22:08, 25 March 2019 (UTC)

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for disruptive editing. You've been blocked twice previously for adding/restoring unsourced disputed content to articles and persist in doing so when the blocks expire. As timed blocks have not made any difference with regard to your editing practices or communication skills I have blocked you indefinitely; specifically, you are blocked until you agree to include reliable sources for your edits and to discuss disputed changes in order to get consensus for them.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}.  Jezebel's Ponyo^{bons mots} 22:16, 25 March 2019 (UTC)