Your submission at Articles for creation: 2024 in Saudi Arabia has been accepted

edit
 
2024 in Saudi Arabia, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

~WikiOriginal-9~ (talk) 11:14, 10 December 2023 (UTC)Reply

Your submission at Articles for creation: Scotland at the 1930 British Empire Games (February 7)

edit
 
Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by TheBritinator was:  The comment the reviewer left was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.
TheBritinator (talk) 13:09, 7 February 2024 (UTC)Reply
 
Hello, TwitterX! Having an article draft declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! TheBritinator (talk) 13:09, 7 February 2024 (UTC)Reply

Your submission at Articles for creation: Scotland at the 1930 British Empire Games (February 17)

edit
 
Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Encoded was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.
Encoded Talk to me! 16:07, 17 February 2024 (UTC)Reply

1953 Winter Deaflympics moved to draftspace

edit

Thanks for your contributions to 1953 Winter Deaflympics. Unfortunately, I do not think it is ready for publishing at this time because it needs more sources to establish notability. I have converted your article to a draft which you can improve, undisturbed for a while.

Please see more information at Help:Unreviewed new page. When the article is ready for publication, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page OR move the page back. Significa liberdade (she/her) (talk) 19:23, 19 March 2024 (UTC)Reply

Your submission at Articles for creation: 1953 Winter Deaflympics (April 1)

edit
 
Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Encoded was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.
Encoded  Talk 💬 18:05, 1 April 2024 (UTC)Reply

Your submission at Articles for creation: Denmark in the Eurovision Song Contest 2025 (June 15)

edit
 
Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Encoded was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.
Encoded  Talk 💬 08:24, 15 June 2024 (UTC)Reply

Concern regarding Draft:Scotland at the 1930 British Empire Games

edit

  Hello, TwitterX. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Scotland at the 1930 British Empire Games, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 17:06, 19 July 2024 (UTC)Reply

Your draft article, Draft:Scotland at the 1930 British Empire Games

edit
 

Hello, TwitterX. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or draft page you started, "Scotland at the 1930 British Empire Games".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material, the draft has been deleted. When you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz Read! Talk! 17:37, 17 August 2024 (UTC)Reply

Proposed deletion of Pieni Laitasaari

edit

Hello, TwitterX

Welcome to Wikipedia! I edit here too, under the username Harrz, and I thank you for your contributions.

I wanted to let you know, however, that I've proposed an article that you started, Pieni Laitasaari, for deletion because it meets one or more of our deletion criteria, and I don't think that it is suitable for inclusion in the encyclopedia. The particular issue can be found in the notice that is now visible at the top of the article.

If you wish to contest the deletion:

  1. Edit the page
  2. Remove the text that looks like this: {{proposed deletion/dated...}}
  3. Click the Publish changes button.

If you object to the article's deletion, please remember to explain why you think the article should be kept on the article's talk page and improve the page to address the issues raised in the deletion notice. Otherwise, it may be deleted later by other means.

If you have any questions, please leave a comment here and prepend it with {{Re|Harrz}}. And remember to sign your reply with ~~~~. Thanks!

(Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

harrz talk 17:20, 13 September 2024 (UTC)Reply

If this version is purposed for deletion, then why is Cebuno and Svenska's article has been up since 2016 by a bot?
{{Re|Harrz}}
TwitterX (talk) 08:56, 14 September 2024 (UTC)Reply
Hi, TwitterX. Different language Wikipedias have different requirements for the notability of article subjects. In the English language Wikipedia, the notability guidelines relevant for articles about islands are the general notability guideline, which is the "default" guideline, and the Notability guideline for geographic features, more specifically its section on natural features. For an island to be considered "notable" as Wikipedia uses the word, the island should reach at least one of the general notability guideline or the geographical features notability guideline.
As noted by the message above, the proposed deletion process is very simple, and you can object to the deletion. If you do so, others may elect to begin a longer discussion about whether the topic should have its own article or whether the content might be more suited for, for example, brief mention in some larger article. Ljleppan (talk) 10:13, 17 September 2024 (UTC)Reply