Vivaperucarajo

>>>Image Copyright problems subpage

Welcome!

Hello, Vivaperucarajo, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are a few good links for newcomers:

• The five pillars of Wikipedia
• How to edit a page
• Help pages
• Tutorial
• How to write a great article
• Manual of Style

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Where to ask a question, ask me on my talk page, or place {{helpme}} on your talk page and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Again, welcome! , SqueakBox 05:18, 3 February 2006 (UTC)

Input for next Wikiproject Collaboration

Seeing as we are almost done with the Andrés Avelino Cáceres collaboration and March is coming up. I'd thought that I should inform you and the other members of WP:Peru that you can add your thoughts on what you think the next project collaboration should be on at Wikipedia:WikiProject_Peru#Collaboration.--Jersey Devil 21:17, 25 February 2006 (UTC)

Thankx

Thanx for all the changes you made to the Peru article. It looks a lot better since the last time i read it. I'm from Peru too. --CesarCossio 08:19, 4 March 2006 (UTC)

Talk:History of the Ecuadorian-Peruvian territorial dispute

Hello there! I'm also peruvian, and most of the time I try to prevent POV pushing that involves the history and politics of our country. This time; however, a new Wikipedian from Ecuador has attempted to introduce POV in this page. I removed, and he is claiming that the problem is now my person here in Wikipedia. He started a flame war last time (wich you can see in the talk page). Personally, I'm only trying to give the article a fair and NPOV shape. Please, I would gladly recieve any sign of support in this article. Cheers! and I hope to hear from you soon. Messhermit 03:05, 10 March 2006 (UTC)

• Hello. I'm from Ecuador. Please note that adding facts and sources from the Ecuadorian side is not POV. Perhaps putting a picture of the Peruvian monument to victory in the article Ecuadorian-Peruvian war, claiming as a historical truth that Ecuador sent troops to occupy Zarumilla, or adding a list of Peruvian heroes could be categorized as NPOV attitudes. But let us leave that to Messhermit.

As for the flame war of months ago, it was not started by me. You can read my attempts to have a moderator see Messhermit's conduct regarding unjustified reverts. Please read the section Complaints of Deletion in Messhermit's talk page. It must be noted that this IP user is the same person that later wrote the article under the nick Neurodivergent. Hope you can help, regardless of nationalities. Regards, and sorry to bother you. Andres C. 15:05, 10 March 2006 (UTC)

---

Thanks for your support.

• As you can see this user relies mostly on Ecuadorian versions of the war. Most of this have either the title Peruvian Aggresion or Peruvian Invasion, and I really have my doubts about the neutrality and imparciality that those sources are.
• This Ecuadorian user clearly believes that he has the truth on his sides, and usually gets military figures out of nowhere. his goal thus is presenting a weak and innocent Ecuador against an all mighty and aggresive Peruvian State.
• Regarding the Flame War, this user claims to be the victim of my aggressions. Nothing more baseless, since who in his sane mine would use grammatical errors against another wikipedist and make a big fuss over them? or who will accuse another wikipedist of treason to his country just because I didn't serve in my army?.

Best regards, and keep an eye on the page. It seems that we are gonna see Ecuadorian POV pushings for some time. Messhermit 18:25, 10 March 2006 (UTC)

It seems that, regarding the fact that you have clearly stated that no territory was lost by neither side, the other user involved will not accept your contribution. It clearly wants to make believe the reader that Ecuador Lost territory in favor of Peru. Help me to get rid of that Biased and baseless proposition. Messhermit 00:47, 13 March 2006 (UTC)

---

Luis H. Delgado is a Peruvian historian. The figures are not from nowhere Messhermit, they are from books. No, I don't have the truth on my side. Ecuador lost the war because it's military forces were weak and unprepared. That's not Peru's fault. That's Ecuador's own fault. Please keep cool Messhermit. Finally, I think this is not the place to go on discussing this things. I suspect Vivaperucarajo is not pleased to see this discussion between two other Wikipedists in his talk page. For that, I present my apologies to Vivaperucarajo. Regards. Andres C. 19:09, 10 March 2006 (UTC)

---

oh well...you know, sometimes it's not so easy for people to understand each other over the internet. Nothing to worry about, we all just need to have a little patience. Anyway, after all the details that I gave you regarding the change of territory that ocurred as a result of the 1942 treaty, relative to the statu-quo line agreed upon by both parties in 1936, what is exactly what you want the article to say?

• a, that there was not a single square yard that changed hands relative to the 1936 line (which is wrong)?
• b, that there were 13,000-plus km2 that changed hands, (which is wrong)?
• c, that there were 23,000-plus km2 that changed hands?
• d, that Ecuador gave to Peru 18,000-plus km2 and Peru to Ecuador 5,000-plus km2?

If you could give us a more clear answer, we can fix this faster. BTW, the original text about 14,000 km2 changing hands was not mine. If you allow me to make a suggestion, readers would be better informed if we chose option d.

Best Regards, Andres C. 20:21, 11 March 2006 (UTC)

Participants in World War II

You edited the entry for Peru to state that Peru destroyed a U-boat and a "battleship". Given that the German Navy had few battleships (2 or 4 depending on your definition) and their histories are known, which ship are you referring to and what's your reference? Folks at 137 00:10, 12 March 2006 (UTC)

I got this information from the history section in the Peru article and there are many sources there if you are interested. As you state there were few German battle ships and the specific type of ship might have been confused. As I said there are many sources there to be sure.

Thank you, Vivaperucarajo 06:06, 12 March 2006 (UTC)

Checked the sources on the Peru page, but no support for the actions against the Kriegsmarine. Checked elsewhere, still no support. I've left messages with other editors: if their replies are also negative, then I think that the claims are false, especially with the recent amend history to the Peru page. Pity, I like proving unlikely stories. Give it a day or 2. Folks at 137 11:01, 13 March 2006 (UTC)

Thank you for your interest and time. It is appreciated. I also came up with an idea of going to into more detail of Peru's involvment in the war because it directly affected a different war at the time between Peru and Ecuador and the United States' strong push against hemispherical unity against the Axis Powers.

Thank you, Vivaperucarajo 04:22, 14 March 2006 (UTC)

LAN Peru at MIA

LANPeru is listed as (LAN operated by Lan Peru) because the airline is serviced as LAN at MIA, by LAN Staff, and operates as a LAN flight. I'm not even sure they use LanPeru Aircraft, if the airline was separate from LAN, then we'd listed by itself, but since it is operated as a subsidiary of LAN at MIA, then the airline is listed together. Same goes for JFK, I believe. Thanks. – SmthManly / ^ManlyTalk / ^{ManlyContribs} 19:47, 26 March 2006 (UTC)

Still, all flights have the same check-in space, and ground staff, which is what is being listed at MIA since it only has one big terminal. If we listed as a separate airline, people will think that it has its own separate check-in area, staff, etc. It's like US Airways operated by America West. – SmthManly / ^ManlyTalk / ^{ManlyContribs} 20:05, 26 March 2006 (UTC)

The only reason they have the same check-in space and ground staff is for convienience reasons. This doesen't mean that the flight is operated by LAN Airlines. The list refers to which airlines fly in and out of the airport. Vivaperucarajo 21:27, 26 March 2006 (UTC)

Alright, I thought that LanPeru wasn't flying its own metal to MIA, and instead using LAN planes as they did before, but I actually saw the 767 take off yesterday so that really shut me up. LOL. – SmthManly / ^ManlyTalk / ^{ManlyContribs} 14:49, 29 March 2006 (UTC)

It's OK as it is a common mistake. Actually for most of the existance of the airline they have been using their own planes. I have flown with them a number of times the first being in 2000 and they still operated their own planes as I still use the dinner platter for my sandwiches. LOL. Thank You, Vivaperucarajo 05:43, 30 March 2006 (UTC) P.S. I have been to Miami 9 times and it is beautiful city

I knew they used their own metal in Peru, A320s and such, but I didn't know they used their own planes for long international segments, like to MIA or JFK, or MAD (do they fly to MAD?). I always remember seeing only LAN planes at MIA, and I knew they it was mostly LAN flying to places like Bogota, Caracas, Cancun, Punta Cana, and of course Santiago, from Miami so I assumed that it would be the same for Lima. Do you know if LANEcuador has its own planes, too? I'm actually pretty bored of Miami, I've been wanting to move for a while to another part of the country. I got plenty of pride for the place (being my hometown and all), but I want a change of scenery, you know. I've been living here for 16 years after moving from Houston at age five, and from Colombia before then when my family immigrated. I guess you probably know I speak Spanish now, too (who doesn't in Miami?).

Lim

Hello! I really agree with you about Lim and what you did with the pages of the airport and the bay... but I don't agree with the fact that the disambiguation page was deleted, because now, if someone is searching for the Lim bay, he/she cannot find it easily. I think there should also be a disambiguation page and if I'm not mistaken there was one with 3 links to 3 different articles, but I don't remember which articles. So, please can you tell me which articles were on the disambiguation page (if you still remember them) so that I can rewrite the page? Thank you. --Ivana 20:06, 28 March 2006 (UTC)

It's not a problem. :) Tomorrow I'll start a disambiguation page with Lim Airport and Lim bay! ;) --Ivana 22:56, 29 March 2006 (UTC)

Gran Boicot Americano

Por qué no miras que alguien de la organización de la huelga nos ponga la imagen en algún sitio WEB de Wikipedia, Viquipèdia, o Commons con la licencia GNU, para que podamos copiar la imagen del poster libremente, según las condiciones GNU?

Pérez 16:35, 3 May 2006 (UTC)

¿A cual imagen está usted refiriendosé? P.D. No me da problema que hablés castellano con migo pero otras personas en el Wikipedia ingles se enojan cuando le hablas en una idioma diferente.

Vivaperucarajo 23:44, 4 May 2006 (UTC)

Prefiero escribir en castellano, pues mi inglés es muy macarrónico. Me referia a la imagen de la convocatoria del Gran Boicot Americano, ¿no conoces (sabes) a alguien de la organización que puediera poner una imagen del poster de la convocatoria en Commons, o similar? Pérez 20:57, 19 May 2006 (UTC)

Lo unico que se es que el creador del imagen es Dposse y que bajo la ley internacionales si se puede usar el imagen en wikipedia. Vivaperucarajo 23:52, 19 May 2006 (UTC)

LAN Argentina

Sabes algo sobre el vuelo de LanArgentina que cancelaron por no tener avion con registracion argentina u estadounidense, creo que dijeron que reempieza (sp?) en Abril o Mayo? – SmthManly / ^ManlyTalk / ^{ManlyContribs} 11:55, 8 April 2006 (UTC)

No estoy seguro pero problamente es porque el gobierno de Argentina tiene preferiencia a Aerolineas Argentinas cual es 100% argentino. Esto es commun con las aerolineas y es mas probable que el vuelo se reempieza en un poco tiempo. Me recuerdo una vez hace unos años que paso esto con Aero Continente Chile, y el Gobierno de Chile. Eso tambien se resolvio en seguida. Vivaperucarajo 05:05, 14 May 2006 (UTC)

perdona la intromision, pero Aerolineas Argentinas no es "100% argentino", hace mucho tiempo fue vendido al consorcio Marsans (español) que lo controla 100%.--194.203.215.254 (talk) 16:07, 20 December 2007 (UTC)

Peruvian City Template

Thanks for making this template!--Jersey Devil 02:25, 3 June 2006 (UTC)

De nada, Vivaperucarajo 02:36, 3 June 2006 (UTC)

Help airport images

I have been loading airport images to airport pages and when I save the page the image is just a white box with a red "x". I know that it knows that is should be there because it doesn't show up as a dead link. If anyone knows why this happens please contanct me.

Thank you Vivaperucarajo 05:11, 13 June 2006 (UTC)

Yeah I have noticed this problem within the last couple of days, it appears to be a server problem. The images are fine, they are just not displaying. Purging at image will get it to appear, example url: http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Image:Andahuaylasairport.png&action=purge

--Commander Keane 05:23, 13 June 2006 (UTC)

Thanks alot, Vivaperucarajo 05:24, 13 June 2006 (UTC)

Actually I'm not sure if purging is working. I'm sure the problem will be fixed soon though.--Commander Keane 05:29, 13 June 2006 (UTC)

Mejorar artículos

Disculpe que te moleste, pero veo que hay distintos artículos de países latinoamericanos, que tienen poca información o información poco importante, como el caso de Perú, quizás quieras expander esos artículos, también sería buena idea que se expandiera información de los países mas desarrollados de latinoamérica: Argentina,Brasil,Chile y México, te pido esto principalmente por que dominas el inglés, y podrías basarte en los artículso de español. No te escribo en Inglés por que no lo domino al 100%, gracias.

Missing sources

The following images have no source who can verify that the copyright tag is correct. Please use the name of the publication or URL to a web site where this permission is explicit. Thuresson 13:53, 22 June 2006 (UTC)

• Image:ArequipaIntlAirport.jpg
• Image:Lan-Peru-logo.jpg
• Image:Location of the city of Chiclayo Peru.PNG
• Image:Cuscoairport.gif
• Image:Archbishop's palace.jpg
• Image:Casa de aliaga.jpg
• Image:Aeropuerto iquitos.gif
• Image:Trujillo airport.jpg
• Image:Perurail Route map.gif
• Image:Route map.gif
• Image:Perurail first class.jpg
• Image:Perurail backpacker train.jpg
• Image:Hiram Bingham train.jpg
• Image:Chiclayo Escudo.JPG
• Image:Viaexpressa.jpg
• Image:Japanambasadorresidencelima.jpg
• Image:Limanight.jpg

Captain Rolden International Airport

I've been working on putting infoboxes in airports and had a bit of trouble when I came to this airport. The "Airport information for SPCL". World Aero Data. Archived from the original on 2019-03-05.{{cite web}}: CS1 maint: unfit URL (link) Data current as of October 2006. is the correct code for the airport but when I got there to get the information it says it is "Cap. FAP David Abenzur Rengifo Airport". When I searched through Google I got results for both. There were more for Captian Rolden but the two main sources (World Aero Database & Falling Rain both have the Rengifo name. I saw you created the article and was hoping you could help sort it out. Thanks. CambridgeBayWeather (Talk) 16:05, 28 June 2006 (UTC)

Wayraperu and LIM

Hello. You must be referring to my July 30 edit on Jorge Chávez International Airport. Let me clarify something with regard to my edit. I DO NOT insist to the fact of Avianca operated by Wayraperu. Whatever the relations of the two companies is, I do not care. What I care about is that the anonymous edit before me, which I reverted, simply erased Wayraperu from the list of airlines, thus making it look like there are no Wayraperu flights at all. Elektrik Blue 82 12:29, 2 August 2006 (UTC)

Lim page

Hello, I added something to Talk:Lim and the same thing to Talk:Jorge Chávez International Airport. ~a (user • talk • contribs) 21:00, 23 August 2006 (UTC)

I think User:Elektrik blue 82 showed us there is a difference between Ord vs ORD. He made the appropriate change to Lim/LIM. ~a (user • talk • contribs) 21:45, 24 August 2006 (UTC)

Tren Urbano image

Did you actually create Image:Limaprincipallines.jpg? It looks like a government map. --Descendall 07:10, 7 September 2006 (UTC) no i did not creat it it must have been an accident. I thought it had another source but if this is not the case I will look for one or delete the image. Thanks for notifing me anyways.

Vivaperucarajo 23:26, 7 September 2006 (UTC)

I have listed Image:Limaprincipallines.jpg for deletion. --Descendall 07:08, 28 September 2006 (UTC)

Your comment on my talk page

I'm going to say this exactly once: I do not care what you think or want. I am going to go through the process of deleting every single copyright violation that you have uploaded to wikipedia. Every single one. This involves nominating all of them for deletion and telling you that they are being considered for deletion. The fact that you have trimmed the copyright notice off of scores of images makes it clear that you uploaded them in bad faith. You have had multiple warnings concerning copyrights placed on your talk page. If you want them removed, the process is simple: contact an adminstrator, tell them that you want to be permenately banned from wikipedia, and request that they blank your page as you leave. Until then, you must stop uploading copyrighted material to wikipedia. End of story. --Descendall 03:49, 11 October 2006 (UTC)

Do not edit my comments on your page

From Wikipedia:Talk page guidelines:

Don't edit others' comments: Refrain from editing others' comments without their permission (with the exception of prohibited material such as libel and personal details). It is not necessary to bring talk pages to publishing standards, so there is no need to correct typing errors, grammar, etc. It tends to irritate the users whose comments you are correcting. Never edit someone's words to change their meaning.

Thanks. --Descendall 21:17, 16 October 2006 (UTC)

You should just make an archive and store everything above in it, it's what we all do when our talk pages get filled up. It should be noted that removing warnings on Wikipedia is generally considered bad form but since I am pretty sure that wasn't your intention I'm not going to start riding you for that. But still, you should know that for future reference. Later.--Jersey Devil 02:52, 17 October 2006 (UTC)

Unspecified source for Image:Escudolima.gif

Thanks for uploading Image:Escudolima.gif. I notice the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you have not created this file yourself, then there needs to be a justification explaining why we have the right to use it on Wikipedia (see copyright tagging below). If you did not create the file yourself, then you need to specify where it was found, i.e., in most cases link to the website where it was taken from, and the terms of use for content from that page.

If the file also doesn't have a copyright tag, then one should be added. If you created/took the picture, audio, or video then the {{GFDL-self}} tag can be used to release it under the GFDL. If you believe the media meets the criteria at Wikipedia:Fair use, use a tag such as {{Non-free fair use in|article name}} or one of the other tags listed at Wikipedia:Image copyright tags#Fair_use. See Wikipedia:Image copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have specified their source and tagged them, too. You can find a list of files you have uploaded by following this link. Unsourced and untagged images may be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Fritz S. (Talk) 11:45, 26 November 2006 (UTC)

Orphaned fair use image (Image:Escudolima.gif)

Thanks for uploading Image:Escudolima.gif. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable under fair use (see our fair use policy).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any fair use images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. This is an automated message from BJBot 04:12, 29 January 2007 (UTC)

Roberto Carrión Pollit

A tag has been placed on Roberto Carrión Pollit, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done because the article seems to be about a person, group of people, band, club, company, or web content, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is notable, that is, why an article about that subject should be included in Wikipedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, articles that do not assert notability may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable, and if you can indicate why the subject of this article is notable, you may contest the tagging. To do this, add {{hangon}} on the top of the page (below the existing db tag) and leave a note on the article's talk page explaining your position. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would confirm its subject's notability under the guidelines.

For guidelines on specific types of articles, you may want to check out our criteria for biographies, for web sites, for bands, or for companies. Feel free to leave a note on my talk page if you have any questions about this. Bmg916 ^{Speak to Me} 18:57, 11 March 2007 (UTC)

List of 30 largest cities in Peru

Howdy, I wanted to let you know I tagged the article you created and blanked, List of 30 largest cities in Peru for speedy deletion. My guess from the blanking was that you wanted the page deleted. You can tag such articles youself with {{db-author}}, if you are the sole substantive contributor to the article. If I was mistaken, feel free to recreate the page. If there is anything I can help with, feel free to write a note on the bottom of my talk page, User_talk:TeaDrinker. Thanks and keep up the great work! --TeaDrinker 23:31, 6 May 2007 (UTC)

Disputed fair use rationale for Image:San lorenzo.PNG

Thanks for uploading Image:San lorenzo.PNG. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read the instructions at Wikipedia:Non-free content carefully, then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies for fair use. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot 03:51, 29 September 2007 (UTC)

Flags in airport articles

Please abide by consensus which is to have no flag icons. Also, the consensus for the destination list is to have the city, not the airport, and without a link. Please take a look at Wikipedia:WikiProject Airports#Airport article structure and Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Airports#Ministro Pistarini International Airport for some relevant material. By the way flags should never be used unless the countries name is included, see Wikipedia:Manual of Style (flags)#Accompany flags with country names). Thanks. CambridgeBayWeather Have a gorilla 12:00, 9 February 2008 (UTC)

Disputed fair use rationale for Image:8perureal.PNG

Thanks for uploading Image:8perureal.PNG. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read the instructions at Wikipedia:Non-free content carefully, then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies for fair use. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot (talk) 03:58, 12 February 2008 (UTC)

Disputed fair use rationale for Image:100soles.jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:100soles.jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read the instructions at Wikipedia:Non-free content carefully, then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies for fair use. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot (talk) 04:42, 12 February 2008 (UTC)

Speedy deletion of Template:OldPeruCurrencies

A tag has been placed on Template:OldPeruCurrencies requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section T3 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is a deprecated or orphaned template. After seven days, if it is still unused and the speedy deletion tag has not been removed, the template will be deleted.

If the template is intended to be substituted, please feel free to remove the speedy deletion tag and please consider putting a note on the template's page indicating that it is substituted so as to avoid any future mistakes (<noinclude>{{transclusionless}}</noinclude>).

Thanks. --MZMcBride (talk) 04:15, 16 February 2008 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free media (Image:Peruvian nuevo sol coins.jpg)

Thanks for uploading Image:Peruvian nuevo sol coins.jpg. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. BetacommandBot (talk) 19:41, 17 February 2008 (UTC)

Disputed fair use rationale for Image:Peruvian nuevo sol coins reverse.jpg

Thank you for uploading Image:Peruvian nuevo sol coins reverse.jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale provided for using this image under "fair use" may not meet the criteria required by Wikipedia:Non-free content. This can be corrected by going to the image description page and add or clarify the reason why the image qualifies for fair use. Adding and completing one of the templates available from Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy. Please be aware that a fair use rationale is not the same as an image copyright tag; descriptions for images used under the fair use policy require both a copyright tag and a fair use rationale.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it might be deleted by adminstrator within a few days in accordance with our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions, please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot (talk) 14:55, 8 March 2008 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free media (Image:Rnlogo.jpg)

Thanks for uploading Image:Rnlogo.jpg. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. BJBot (talk) 12:13, 16 March 2008 (UTC)

Image copyright problem with Image:Peru-Gran Colombia.PNG

Image Copyright problem

Hi Vivaperucarajo!
We thank you for uploading Image:Peru-Gran Colombia.PNG, but there is a problem. Your image is currently missing information on its copyright status. Wikipedia takes copyright very seriously. Unless you can help by adding a copyright tag, it may be deleted by an Administrator. If you know this information, then we urge you to add a copyright tag to the image description page. We apologize for this, but all images must confirm to policy on Wikipedia.

If you have any questions, please feel free to ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thanks so much for your cooperation.
This message is from a robot. --John Bot III (talk) 21:59, 25 April 2008 (UTC)

San isidro-lima

I deleted it because it was licensed under a forbidden noncommercial use only license. I can undelete the image for you to relicense under one of the licenses listed here if you'd like. See WP:ICT/FL for more possible licenses. bibliomaniac15 Do I have your trust? 01:51, 6 May 2008 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free media (Image:Union por el Peru1.png)

Thanks for uploading Image:Union por el Peru1.png. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. BJBot (talk) 12:27, 7 May 2008 (UTC)

you're so bad man, you use bad words in your username —Preceding unsigned comment added by 201.230.35.22 (talk) 23:50, 17 May 2008 (UTC)

Italians

Hi. I reverted your recent edit to the template because I could not find the support for your numbers in the reference cited. Where did these numbers come from?? If you have a valid reference that supports your claim, please include it. Dionix (talk) 17:28, 27 May 2008 (UTC)

Cielos del Oriente

Hola Vivaperucarajo

Sabes tú el nombre del aeropuerto de Bolognesi? Me prugunto también si este aeropuerto tiene códigos IATA y/o OACI... Es para incorporarlo en el list of airports in Peru eventualmente.

Hasta luego,

Belgian man (talk) 15:49, 13 June 2008 (UTC)

Peru

Hello, I was wondering about your recent additions to the Peru article. I think adding so much info on recent economic data and forecasts goes in detriment of the article's quality. According to Wikipedia:WikiProject Countries, a country article is supposed to summarize the more relevant info about a particular nation without going into excessive detail, otherwise the article would quickly grow out of control. The Peru article has, in its current form, appropriately condensed the most important topics about the country and has been recognized as a featured article in Wikipedia. I see no point in expanding it further, instead, we should be working in improving subarticles such as Economy of Peru which are not in a good shape. If you still think the extra info should go in, let's have a discussion at Talk:Peru so that all interested wikipedians can voice their opinions and we can reach a consensus before making these changes. Greetings, --Victor12 (talk) 00:03, 25 July 2008 (UTC)

Speedy deletion of Template:CF party

A tag has been placed on Template:CF party requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section T3 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is a deprecated or orphaned template. After seven days, if it is still unused and the speedy deletion tag has not been removed, the template will be deleted.

If the template is intended to be substituted, please feel free to remove the speedy deletion tag and please consider putting a note on the template's page indicating that it is substituted so as to avoid any future mistakes (<noinclude>{{transclusionless}}</noinclude>).

Thanks. --MZMcBride (talk) 16:00, 12 September 2008 (UTC)

AfD nomination of List of most populous provinces in Peru

I have nominated List of most populous provinces in Peru, an article that you created, for deletion. I do not think that this article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and have explained why at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/List of most populous provinces in Peru. Your opinions on the matter are welcome at that same discussion page; also, you are welcome to edit the article to address these concerns. Thank you for your time. —Largo Plazo (talk) 18:46, 12 November 2008 (UTC)

Lima

thanks for the great work expanding the Lima article. Just needs a few more references now. Michellecrisp (talk) 05:31, 13 November 2008 (UTC)

Hi, not only references are needed but the information you added needs to be summarised according to Wikipedia:Summary style. Awkawasi (talk) 21:41, 13 November 2008 (UTC)

Unreferenced BLPs

Hello Vivaperucarajo! Thank you for your contributions. I am a bot alerting you that 3 of the articles that you created are tagged as Unreferenced Biographies of Living Persons. The biographies of living persons policy requires that all personal or potentially controversial information be sourced. In addition, to ensure verifiability, all biographies should be based on reliable sources. If you were to bring these articles up to standards, it would greatly help us with the current 377 article backlog. Once the articles are adequately referenced, please remove the {{unreferencedBLP}} tag. Here is the list:

1. Lizardo Alzamora Porras - Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL
2. Ricardo Belmont Cassinelli - Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL
3. Mercedes Aráoz - Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL

Thanks!--DASHBot (talk) 05:55, 15 January 2010 (UTC)

Categories for discussion nomination of Category:Provinces of the Callao Region

Category:Provinces of the Callao Region, which you created, has been nominated for deletion, merging, or renaming. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the Categories for discussion page. Thank you. -- Black Falcon ^(talk) 04:35, 4 March 2010 (UTC)

Nomination for deletion of Template:AF party

Template:AF party has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page. Thank you. The Evil IP address (talk) 18:14, 20 June 2010 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:100soles.jpg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:100soles.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of "file" pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Courcelles 03:49, 3 May 2011 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:20soles.jpg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:20soles.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of "file" pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Courcelles 04:43, 3 May 2011 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:5 soles.jpg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:5 soles.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of "file" pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Courcelles 04:44, 3 May 2011 (UTC)

Nomination for deletion of Template:APRA party

Template:APRA party has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page. Sfan00 IMG (talk) 06:09, 4 May 2011 (UTC)

File:1828 Grand Colombia and Peru map.PNG listed for deletion

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:1828 Grand Colombia and Peru map.PNG, has been listed at Wikipedia:Files for deletion. Please see the discussion to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. Kelly ^hi! 15:13, 20 March 2012 (UTC)

Your contributed article, List of the 15 Most Populous metropolitan areas in Peru

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.

You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

Hello, I notice that you recently created a new page, List of the 15 Most Populous metropolitan areas in Peru. First, thank you for your contribution; Wikipedia relies solely on the efforts of volunteers such as you. Unfortunately, the page you created covers a topic on which we already have a page - [[:]]. Because of the duplication, your article has been tagged for speedy deletion. Please note that this is not a comment on you personally and we hope you will continue helping to improve Wikipedia. If the topic of the article you created is one that interests you, then perhaps you would like to help out at [[:]] - you might like to discuss new information at [[Talk:|the article's talk page]].

If you think that the article you created should remain separate, contest the nomination by clicking on the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion" in the speedy deletion tag. Doing so will take you to the talk page where you can explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. You can also visit the page's talk page directly to give your reasons, but be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but do not hesitate to add information that is consistent with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, you can contact one of these administrators to request that the administrator userfy the page or email a copy to you. Additionally if you would like to have someone review articles you create before they go live so they are not nominated for deletion shortly after you post them, allow me to suggest the article creation process and using our search feature to find related information we already have in the encyclopedia. Try not to be discouraged. Wikipedia looks forward to your future contributions. Cmonzonc (talk) 23:07, 3 May 2012 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of List of the 15 Most Populous metropolitan areas in Peru

The article List of the 15 Most Populous metropolitan areas in Peru has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

This is an original research, It does not have enough references, and in fact there are unreliable, even one of them is a blog. only the references of some metropolitan areas are verifiable, with regard to the "population" of the same this is not verifiable, about the same article in other languages, all were created by the same IP, there seems to be making a claim <pasar> that oinformación as true or trustworthy

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Cmonzonc (talk) 23:12, 3 May 2012 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of List of the Most Populous metropolitan areas in Peru

The article List of the Most Populous metropolitan areas in Peru has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

This is an original research, It does not have enough references, and in fact there are unreliable, even one of them is a blog. only the references of some metropolitan areas are verifiable, with regard to the "population" of the same this is not verifiable, about the same article in other languages, all were created by the same IP, there seems to be making a claim that information lika true or trustworthy

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Cmonzonc (talk) 07:43, 4 May 2012 (UTC)

Notification of automated file description generation

Your upload of File:Cononortemap.PNG or contribution to its description is noted, and thanks (even if belatedly) for your contribution. In order to help make better use of the media, an attempt has been made by an automated process to identify and add certain information to the media's description page.

This notification is placed on your talk page because a bot has identified you either as the uploader of the file, or as a contributor to its metadata. It would be appreciated if you could carefully review the information the bot added. To opt out of these notifications, please follow the instructions here. Thanks! Message delivered by Theo's Little Bot (opt-out) 15:04, 23 May 2014 (UTC)

ArbCom elections are now open!

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 13:43, 23 November 2015 (UTC)

ArbCom Elections 2016: Voting now open!

Hello, Vivaperucarajo. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)

Nomination for deletion of Template:Lima districts imagemap

Template:Lima districts imagemap has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page. Frietjes (talk) 14:10, 15 August 2017 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of File:Cononortemap.PNG

The file File:Cononortemap.PNG has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Orphaned map.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated files}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the file's talk page.

Please consider addressing the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated files}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and files for discussion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. ~ Rob₁₃^Talk 15:11, 3 March 2018 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of File:Limacommercialareamap.PNG

The file File:Limacommercialareamap.PNG has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Orphaned map.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated files}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the file's talk page.

Please consider addressing the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated files}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and files for discussion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. ~ Rob₁₃^Talk 15:11, 3 March 2018 (UTC)

Please attribute or claim media you uploaded or restored: File:Location of Sullana Province.PNG

You uploaded or restored , File:Location of Sullana Province.PNG, but for various reasons did not add an {{information}} block, or indicate your (user) name on the file description page. Media uploaded to Wikipedia needs information on the SPECIFIC authorship and source of files, to ensure that it complies with copyright laws in various jurisdictions.

If it's entirely your own work:
please include {{own}} in the relevant source field, amend the {{information}} added by a third party, ensuring that your user name (or name you want used for attribution) is clear in the author field, and change the license to an appropriate "self" variant (if such a license is not already used). You should also add an |author= parameter to the license tag, to assist reviews and image patrollers.

When you have copmpleted the above steps:

• If the {{media by uploader}} tag is present please add, a |claimed=yes parameter to the tag.
• If the {{img-unclaimed}} tag is present, please change it to {{img-claimed}}

to indicate that you've accepted the given the license shown, and updated the file description page appropriately.

If it's not entirely your own work, or the media is based on the work of others:
Please update the source and authorship fields, so that they accurately reflect the source and authors of the original work(s), as well as the derivative you created. You should also not use a "self" license unless the work is entirely you own. Media that is incorrectly claimed as self or {{own}}, will eventually be listed at Files for Discussion or deleted, unless it's full status is entirely clear to other contributors, reviewers and image patrollers. You should also read Wikipedia:Requesting copyright permission which details how to confirm any permissions you obtained for works by others that are still in copyright.

Whilst this notification, relates to a single media upload, it would also be appreciated if you could ensure that appropriate attribution exists for other media you uploaded, You can find a list of files you have created in your upload log.

If media is not claimed, and there's no other obvious source or authorship information, the file may have to be removed for copyright reasons.

It's okay to remove or strike messages like this once the concerns have been addressed. :). ShakespeareFan00 (talk) 15:48, 18 September 2018 (UTC)

Also:

• File:Location of Huancabamba Province.png
• File:Location of Paita Province.PNG

ShakespeareFan00 (talk) 15:48, 18 September 2018 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of File:Location of the Carabayllo district.PNG

The file File:Location of the Carabayllo district.PNG has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Orphaned map.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated files}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the file's talk page.

Please consider addressing the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated files}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and files for discussion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. ~ Rob₁₃^Talk 20:22, 20 October 2018 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of File:Location of Cieneguilla District.png

The file File:Location of Cieneguilla District.png has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Orphaned map.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated files}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the file's talk page.

Please consider addressing the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated files}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and files for discussion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. ~ Rob₁₃^Talk 20:22, 20 October 2018 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of File:Location of Lurín District.png

The file File:Location of Lurín District.png has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Orphaned map.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated files}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the file's talk page.

Please consider addressing the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated files}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and files for discussion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. ~ Rob₁₃^Talk 20:22, 20 October 2018 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of File:Location of the Puente Piedra district.PNG

The file File:Location of the Puente Piedra district.PNG has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Orphaned map.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated files}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the file's talk page.

Please consider addressing the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated files}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and files for discussion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. ~ Rob₁₃^Talk 20:23, 20 October 2018 (UTC)

File source problem with File:Location of Huancabamba Province.png

Thank you for uploading File:Location of Huancabamba Province.png. I noticed that the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you did not create this file yourself, you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, please add a link to the page from which it was taken, together with a brief restatement of the website's terms of use of its content. If the original copyright holder is a party unaffiliated with the website, that author should also be credited. Please add this information by editing the image description page.

If the necessary information is not added within the next seven days, the image will be deleted. If the file is already gone, you can still make a request for undeletion and ask for a chance to fix the problem.

Please refer to the image use policy to learn what images you can or cannot upload on Wikipedia. Please also check any other files you have uploaded to make sure they are correctly tagged. Here is a list of your uploads. If you have any questions or are in need of assistance please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.

Also:

• File:Location of Paita Province.PNG
• File:Location of Sullana Province.PNG

This bot DID NOT nominate any file(s) for deletion; please refer to the page history of each individual file for details. Thanks, FastilyBot (talk) 01:00, 1 January 2019 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of File:Limametroinperu.PNG

The file File:Limametroinperu.PNG has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

unused, low-res, no obvious use

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated files}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the file's talk page.

Please consider addressing the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated files}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and files for discussion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion.

This bot DID NOT nominate any file(s) for deletion; please refer to the page history of each individual file for details. Thanks, FastilyBot (talk) 01:02, 24 March 2020 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of File:Limainperu.PNG

The file File:Limainperu.PNG has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

unused, low-res, no obvious use

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated files}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the file's talk page.

Please consider addressing the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated files}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and files for discussion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion.

This bot DID NOT nominate any file(s) for deletion; please refer to the page history of each individual file for details. Thanks, FastilyBot (talk) 01:02, 28 March 2020 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of File:Balconies of the Osambela house.jpg

The file File:Balconies of the Osambela house.jpg has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

unused, low-res, no obvious use

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated files}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the file's talk page.

Please consider addressing the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated files}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and files for discussion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion.

This bot DID NOT nominate any file(s) for deletion; please refer to the page history of each individual file for details. Thanks, FastilyBot (talk) 01:01, 11 May 2020 (UTC)

File:Limean Archbishop's Palace.jpg listed for discussion

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Limean Archbishop's Palace.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Files for discussion. Please see the discussion to see why it has been listed (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry). Feel free to add your opinion on the matter below the nomination. Thank you. Stefan2 (talk) 21:16, 11 October 2021 (UTC)

File:Balconies of the Osambela house.jpg listed for discussion

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Balconies of the Osambela house.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Files for discussion. Please see the discussion to see why it has been listed (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry). Feel free to add your opinion on the matter below the nomination. Thank you. --Minorax^«¦talk¦» 05:24, 24 January 2023 (UTC)

Nomination of List of LATAM Perú destinations for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article List of LATAM Perú destinations is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/List of LATAM Brasil destinations until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

FOARP (talk) 10:39, 13 August 2024 (UTC)