Welcome!

Hello, Voiceofassam, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are a few links to pages you might find helpful:

You may also want to complete the Wikipedia Adventure, an interactive tour that will help you learn the basics of editing Wikipedia. You can visit the Teahouse to ask questions or seek help.

Please remember to sign your messages on talk pages by typing four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask for help on your talk page, and a volunteer should respond shortly. Again, welcome!--Biografer (talk) 05:03, 22 May 2018 (UTC)Reply

Usurping of Kumar Kaibarta Gaon

edit

Don't wikt:usurp an article. Create your own using wp:AfC. Jim1138 (talk) 05:11, 22 May 2018 (UTC)Reply

Hey thank you for your suggestion but I am trying to create a page from last 3 months but Wikipedia did not verify it. Will you please help me to create a Wikipedia page. Actully I am from Gamiripal (a village in Asssam) which is hide from Wikipedia. So I am trying to create my villsge page. I wrote whole article and submit it but still Wikipedia did not verify it. It is shown as a draft. Will you please help me to create it I will give you all details about the village, you just add it on Wikipedia.Voiceofassam (talk) 05:46, 22 May 2018 (UTC)Reply

Gamiripal গমিৰিপাল Gamiripal Village/Town Gamiripal is located in Assam GamiripalGamiripal Location in Assam, India Coordinates: 26.70°N 92.95°ECoordinates: 26.70°N 92.95°E Country India State Assam District Sonitpur Government

• Type	Village

Languages

• Official	Assamese

Gamiripal is a Village area in Sonitpur district, in the Indian state of Assam.

Geography Gamiripal is situated in Sonitpur district of Assam. It is not a huge area rather it is covered by an area of about 1.44sq. Km. The neighbor villages of Gamiripal are Guwalpam, talakabari, khalihamari, panpur etc.. The village Gamiripal is accompanied by a river "Ghiladhari" which is flooded from Arunachal pradesh and terminated in the river Brahmaputra River.

Population As the area of Gamiripal village is not so huge, The population of this area is not high. According to the census report the population of this area is about 1100.Among these population 80% people belongs to Nepali community, 8% belongs to Bengali, 7% belong to assamese and 5% belongs to other communities. Among 1100 peoples male population is about 650and female population is about 450 persent.

Educational Institute Gamiripal is a very well educated place. It has 1 Govt. L.P. School, 1 Govt. M.E. School and 1 Govt. High School. Some English and assamese medium Private sector schools are also available in this area. Gamiripal M. E School is Estd. in the year 1925.

Climate Gamiripal has moderate to warm climate in summer and in February one might require a light pullover or wrap at night. The temperature during the period would be 18 to 23 degree C.

Sights of Gamiripal Hukai Pukhuri This was historical pond of Gamiripal which was dig by King Hukai Bhuyan to bath his 4 no's of daughter's. It is situated near Panchigaon Hukai Pathar. Voiceofassam (talk) 05:53, 22 May 2018 (UTC)Reply

Will you please add this on Wikipedia?? If you want to know more about Gamiripal than please check this link https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Jamugurihat http://wikimapia.org/13132315/GAMIRIPAL https://about.me/Gamiripal Voiceofassam (talk) 05:59, 22 May 2018 (UTC)Reply

Nominate your article

edit

You appear to have never nominated your article. BTW: it appears to need a bit of patching. See wp:AfC - to nominate add {{subst:submit}} (leave out the nowiki / code stuff) Jim1138 (talk) 06:08, 22 May 2018 (UTC)Reply

Gamiripal

edit

Please don't blank. If you want the page to be deleted, ask for it.Xx236 (talk) 07:47, 22 May 2018 (UTC)Reply

I didn't want to delete it

edit

Hey, I didn't want to delete it, just in a few minutes I will fulfil this page Voiceofassam (talk) 08:06, 22 May 2018 (UTC)Reply

What is the difference between Gamiripal village and Gamiripal?Xx236 (talk) 09:11, 22 May 2018 (UTC)Reply

Difference between Gamiripal and Gamiripal village

edit

There are many differences between Gamiripal and Gamiripal village.

Gamiripal village is a backward village area. Their people are not modern... Gamiripal is a town area which is developed. Their people are modern...

Voiceofassam (talk) 09:32, 22 May 2018 (UTC)Reply
You have to reference all your informations. Is the division official? If not - it may be your OR (research), which isn't accepted.Xx236 (talk) 10:09, 22 May 2018 (UTC)Reply

Yes

edit

I am currently working in cencus office of India. So I got this information easily from office serves. Don't worry I will update its sources link in page Voiceofassam (talk) 10:19, 22 May 2018 (UTC)Reply

Hi, so apparently you tried to reach me, but didn't know how. Please use the ping button. It will look like this: {{Ping}}. Hope that helps.--Biografer (talk) 22:08, 23 May 2018 (UTC)Reply

References

edit

Your referencing could use some work. Please see wp:referencing for beginners and help:footnotes. It is best to add a citation (reference) at the end of the item you want to support. Adding them altogether at the end makes it difficult to find the correct one to check. Wikipedia is not an acceptable reference - see wp:CIRCULAR i.e. Citation 1 references citation 2 which references citation 1 again: circular reference. You can copy the reference over from another article. You should mention in the wp:edit summary that is where you copied it from. (Doing so without such a mention is wp:plagiarism)

Also, please be careful about mentioning / using castes and other groups. Doing so seems to cause endless problems on Wikipedia. It has lead to this: WP:CASTES

Did you see the question above under "I didn't want to delete it"? Cheers Jim1138 (talk) 04:44, 24 May 2018 (UTC)Reply

edit

  Hello Voiceofassam, and welcome to Wikipedia. All or some of your addition(s) to Draft:Gamiripal LP School have been removed, as they appear to have added copyrighted material without evidence of permission from the copyright holder. While we appreciate your contributions to Wikipedia, there are certain things you must keep in mind about using information from sources to avoid copyright and plagiarism issues here.

  • You can only copy/translate a small amount of a source, and you must mark what you take as a direct quotation with double quotation marks (") and cite the source using an inline citation. You can read about this at Wikipedia:Non-free content in the sections on "text". See also Help:Referencing for beginners, for how to cite sources here.
  • Aside from limited quotation, you must put all information in your own words and structure, in proper paraphrase. Following the source's words too closely can create copyright problems, so it is not permitted here; see Wikipedia:Close paraphrasing. (There is a college-level introduction to paraphrase, with examples, hosted by the Online Writing Lab of Purdue.) Even when using your own words, you are still, however, asked to cite your sources to verify the information and to demonstrate that the content is not original research.
  • Our primary policy on using copyrighted content is Wikipedia:Copyrights. You may also want to review Wikipedia:Copy-paste.
  • If you own the copyright to the source you want to copy or are a legally designated agent, you may be able to license that text so that we can publish it here. Understand, though, that unlike many other sites, where a person can license their content for use there and retain non-free ownership, that is not possible at Wikipedia. Rather, the release of content must be irrevocable, to the world, into the public domain (PD) or under a suitably-free and compatible copyright license. Such a release must be done in a verifiable manner, so that the authority of the person purporting to release the copyright is evidenced. See Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials.
  • In very rare cases (that is, for sources that are PD or compatibly licensed) it may be possible to include greater portions of a source text. However, please seek help at Wikipedia:Media copyright questions, the help desk or the Teahouse before adding such content to the article. 99.9% of sources may not be added in this way, so it is necessary to seek confirmation first. If you do confirm that a source is public domain or compatibly licensed, you will still need to provide full attribution; see Wikipedia:Plagiarism for the steps you need to follow.
  • Also note that Wikipedia articles may not be copied or translated without attribution. If you want to copy or translate from another Wikipedia project or article, you must follow the copyright attribution steps in Wikipedia:Translation#How to translate. See also Wikipedia:Copying within Wikipedia.

It's very important that contributors understand and follow these practices, as policy requires that people who persistently do not must be blocked from editing. If you have any questions about this, you are welcome to leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. The Mighty Glen (talk) 15:43, 3 June 2018 (UTC)Reply

Your submission at Articles for creation: Hukai Pukhuri (June 3)

edit
 
Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Dodger67 was:  The comment the reviewer left was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.
Roger (Dodger67) (talk) 16:37, 3 June 2018 (UTC)Reply
 
Hello, Voiceofassam! Having an article declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! Roger (Dodger67) (talk) 16:37, 3 June 2018 (UTC)Reply

June 2018

edit

  Your addition to Tyagbir Hem Baruah College has been removed, as it appears to have added copyrighted material to Wikipedia without evidence of permission from the copyright holder. If you are the copyright holder, please read Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials for more information on uploading your material to Wikipedia. For legal reasons, Wikipedia cannot accept copyrighted material, including text or images from print publications or from other websites, without an appropriate and verifiable license. All such contributions will be deleted. You may use external websites or publications as a source of information, but not as a source of content, such as sentences or images—you must write using your own words. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing. See Wikipedia:Copying text from other sources for more information. The Mighty Glen (talk) 09:02, 6 June 2018 (UTC)Reply

This is not copyrighted

edit

Why you mention my article as copyrighted ?? I only copy some details about Tyagbir hem baruah college from its official website Thbcollege.com And also give source for that .. Voiceofassam (talk) 02:53, 7 June 2018 (UTC)Reply

Speedy deletion nomination of Tezpurbuzz

edit
 

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.

You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Tezpurbuzz, requesting that it be deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under two or more of the criteria for speedy deletion, by which pages can be deleted at any time, without discussion. If the page meets any of these strictly-defined criteria, then it may soon be deleted by an administrator. The reasons it has been tagged are:

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. John from Idegon (talk) 07:01, 7 June 2018 (UTC)Reply

Nomination of Tezpurbuzz for deletion

edit
 

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Tezpurbuzz is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Tezpurbuzz until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. John from Idegon (talk) 07:34, 7 June 2018 (UTC)Reply

Speedy deletion nomination of Tezpurbuzz

edit
 

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.

You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Tezpurbuzz, requesting that it be deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under two or more of the criteria for speedy deletion, by which pages can be deleted at any time, without discussion. If the page meets any of these strictly-defined criteria, then it may soon be deleted by an administrator. The reasons it has been tagged are:

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. John from Idegon (talk) 17:58, 7 June 2018 (UTC)Reply

 
This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Voiceofassam (block logactive blocksglobal blockscontribsdeleted contribsfilter logcreation logchange block settingsunblockcheckuser (log))


Request reason:

Actually that my i didnot use my mobile my friend using my mobile so he use slang words please forgive me and these are not my multiple accounts my friend is new in wikipefia so i just assist him how to edit a page on wikipedia and his account is logged in my mobile so the administrator mistakly thought that that was my another account..but in real i have only 1 account

Decline reason:

Thanks for letting us know your account was compromised. As per WP:COMPROMISED, it is no longer eligible for unblock consideration. Even if this wasn't the case, there are clear and confirmed violations of WP:SOCK here, so we wouldn't be unblocking anyway. Yamla (talk) 11:45, 11 June 2018 (UTC)Reply


If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.