This is an archive of past discussions with User:VortexPhantom. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.
Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. This is a notice to inform you that a tag has been placed on Shemford Futuristic School, Muzaffarpur q requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A1 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is a very short article providing little or no context to the reader. Please see Wikipedia:Stub for our minimum information standards for short articles. Also please note that articles must be on notable subjects and should provide references to reliable sources that verify their content.
If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. CycloneYoristalk!08:31, 7 February 2025 (UTC)
February 2025
Latest comment: 1 year ago5 comments4 people in discussion
Hello, I'm Fragrant Peony. I noticed that you recently removed content from Science Olympiad Foundationwithout adequately explaining why. In the future, it would be helpful to others if you described your changes to Wikipedia with an accurate edit summary. If this was a mistake, don't worry; the removed content has been restored. If you would like to experiment, please use your sandbox. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. Fragrant Peony (talk) 07:49, 1 February 2025 (UTC)
Latest comment: 1 year ago1 comment1 person in discussion
Thanks for your contributions to Shemford Futuristic School, Muzaffarpur q. Unfortunately, I do not think it is ready for publishing at this time because it has no sources and it barely has any content and needs more context for publishing to mainspace.
I have converted your article to a draft which you can improve, undisturbed for a while.
Latest comment: 1 year ago2 comments1 person in discussion
Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time.The reason left by Rambley was:
This draft's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article. In summary, the draft needs multiple published sources that are:
in-depth (not just brief mentions about the subject or routine announcements)
Make sure you add references that meet all four of these criteria before resubmitting. Learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue. If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.
Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.
Hello, VortexPhantom!
Having an article draft declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! Rambley(talk)10:32, 7 February 2025 (UTC)
Latest comment: 1 year ago1 comment1 person in discussion
Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time.The reason left by KylieTastic was:
This draft's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article. In summary, the draft needs multiple published sources that are:
in-depth (not just brief mentions about the subject or routine announcements)
Make sure you add references that meet all four of these criteria before resubmitting. Learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue. If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.
Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.
Latest comment: 1 year ago1 comment1 person in discussion
Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time.The reason left by DoubleGrazing was:
This draft's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article. In summary, the draft needs multiple published sources that are:
in-depth (not just brief mentions about the subject or routine announcements)
Make sure you add references that meet all four of these criteria before resubmitting. Learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue. If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.
The comment the reviewer left was:
Please read and understand the WP:ORG notability guideline, so you know what sort of sources we need to see. Currently none of the sources cited contributes anything towards notability.
Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.
No evidence of any notability. An identical Draft has been reviewed 3 times and declined as not notable but the author of the Draft has simply posted an identical version to Mainspace. There is no evidence of notability and fails WP:GNG
You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.
The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Shemford Futuristic School, Muzaffarpur until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.
Latest comment: 1 year ago1 comment1 person in discussion
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Muzaffarpur Junction railway station, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Colonial. Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ• Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)
Ok, I understand that common strategies section must be deleted, but why you deleted my another paragraph on latest update without explaining, is this the role of pending changes reviewer, does articles does need update or you want it remain outdated?? ⚡ VortexPhantom • Talk06:49, 29 March 2025 (UTC)
Your signature
Latest comment: 1 year ago2 comments2 people in discussion
Latest comment: 1 year ago1 comment1 person in discussion
Hi VortexPhantom. After reviewing your request, I have enabled rollback on your account. Please keep the following things in mind while using rollback:
Being granted rollback is no more momentous than installing Twinkle or Ultraviolet. It just adds a [Rollback] button next to a page's latest live revision - that's all. It does not grant you any additional "status" on Wikipedia, nor does it change how Wikipedia policies apply to you.
Rollback should be used to revert clear and unambiguous cases of vandalism only. Never use rollback to revert good faith edits.
Rollback should never be used to edit war, and it should never be used in a content-related dispute to restore the page to your preferred revision. If rollback is abused or used for this purpose or any other inappropriate purpose, the rights will be revoked.
Use common sense. If you're not sure about something, ask!
If you no longer want rollback, contact me and I'll remove it. Also, for some more information on how to use rollback, see Wikipedia:Administrators' guide/Rollback (even though you're not an admin). I'm sure you'll do great with rollback, but feel free to leave me a message on my talk page if you run into trouble or have any questions about appropriate/inappropriate use of rollback. Thank you for helping to reduce vandalism. Happy editing! Malinaccier (talk)14:31, 7 April 2025 (UTC)
Disambiguation link notification for April 13
Latest comment: 1 year ago1 comment1 person in discussion
Latest comment: 1 year ago1 comment1 person in discussion
Please do not put loads of unnecessary horizontal lines in you talk page posts. In your post at Talk:India you added so many horizontal lines in one post that it looked like six separate sections.-- Toddy1(talk)19:12, 20 April 2025 (UTC)
Pending changes reviewer granted
Latest comment: 1 year ago1 comment1 person in discussion
Hello. Your account has been granted the "pending changes reviewer" userright, allowing you to review other users' edits on pages protected by pending changes. The list of articles awaiting review is located at Special:PendingChanges, while the list of articles that have pending changes protection turned on is located at Special:StablePages.
Being granted reviewer rights neither grants you status nor changes how you can edit articles. If you do not want this user right, you may ask any administrator to remove it for you at any time.
Hi VortexPhantom! We're so happy you wanted to play to learn, as a friendly and fun way to get into our community and mission. I think these links might be helpful to you as you get started.
Latest comment: 1 year ago4 comments2 people in discussion
I was Scrolling on the request right section, and I saw that you were requesting the AFC Helper script right, you need 500 edits to the main space, currently have 344 edit to the main space you can check it at your edit Stats which you can find below of your user contribution page or you can use this link Edit Stats so you can regularly check it to see if you have meet the requirements.
From a Fellow user who is also requesting the right Destinyokhiria (talk) 07:12, 11 May 2025 (UTC)
Drafts that go unedited for six months are eligible for deletion, in accordance with our draftspace policy, and this one has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply edit the submission, and remove the {{db-afc}}, {{db-draft}}, or {{db-g13}} code.
If your submission has already been deleted by the time you read this, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the draft so you can continue to work on it.
Latest comment: 9 months ago1 comment1 person in discussion
Hello! Voting in the 2025 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 1 December 2025. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
Latest comment: 4 months ago1 comment1 person in discussion
Hello VortexPhantom! The thread you created at the Teahouse, A user is deleting it's AFC notice., has been archived because there was no discussion for a few days.
Following a motion, the GSCASTE extended-confirmed restriction in the Indian military history case has been narrowed. It now applies to caste-related topics in South Asia, and the preemptive protection remedy has been amended accordingly.
Latest comment: 4 months ago2 comments2 people in discussion
Hello! I have spent days just perusing Wiki and have learnt so much from this platform. I am so glad to finally be able to help out by editing. Where do I begin really?, what do I have to read/learn before I begin? I have already made some test runs through some minor edits. My goal was to make an edit on article because what was being foretold has already happened and so it needs restructuring. It's all a little daunting. --IsadoraPenn (talk) 11:35, 6 April 2026 (UTC)
Glad you asked! I advise you to edit some articles by using wikitext (wikipedia's own language), you can find how to use wikitext here. Choose any topic that you're interested in. You can start gradually by fixing grammar mistakes, etc. By time, if you achieve consistency, you will learn most of the things here. If you need any other advice, feel free to ask! ✓ortexPhantom (talk) 11:50, 6 April 2026 (UTC)
2027 Philadelphia City Council Election
Latest comment: 4 months ago2 comments2 people in discussion
Hi Vortex Phantom,
Thanks for your detailed feedback on this article! I've gone ahead and added verifiable sources to all the claims you listed, including the election date. If you could review again, or provide any feedback in the meantime, that would be most appreciated. Thanks! Yojo98 (talk) 14:18, 7 April 2026 (UTC)
I appreciate your work and glad that you followed my advice. If you believe that your draft can now qualify as article, then be patient, any other reviewer will review that, and give rationale if decline, which areas to work. Currently, I am busy at other projects and will be free in some days, then I will review your draft. Thanks for reaching out. ✓ortexPhantom (talk) 15:13, 7 April 2026 (UTC)
New page reviewer granted
Latest comment: 4 months ago1 comment1 person in discussion
Hi VortexPhantom, I just wanted to let you know that I have added the new page reviewer user right to your account. This means you now have access to the page curation tools and can start patrolling pages from the new pages feed. If you asked for this at requests for permissions, please check back there to see if your access is time-limited or if there are other comments.
This is a good time to re-acquaint yourself with the guidance at Wikipedia:New pages patrol. Before you get started, please take the time to:
Mainly there are two editing methods that allows to cite:
Source
Visual
in source editor, you can add citation by using ref tags and a template that is used according to what source you are using. See WP:REFB for details.
visual editor is most easiest way in which you click " this double quotes mark, and paste the URL to cite, all the rest is automated and citation is created.
If you can't even create cite, fee free to contact.
Appeal to reconsider deleting the page Dachung Gyang
Latest comment: 4 months ago2 comments2 people in discussion
While I understand that additional citations are required to keep to Wikipedia's rules, I also wish to appeal to the team that Dachung Gyang is a well recognised local chief of the early to mid-20th century of the Berom peoples (predominant tribe) of the Jos Plateau; their first ruler in the contemporary world. To take down the page might be misconstrued by many followers of the bearer as unfair and somewhat condescending. I, as creator of the page therefore advise that the team exercise prudence in their decision and patience for members to collect more sources and content for onward addition to the article at least to upgrade it from stub status.
This will be discussed, that is why I have nominated it for deletion. The rule is simple, if subject isn't notable, article can't be made, even as a stub. I think you misunderstood the meaning of stub, stub indicates that subject is notable, but article has to be cover all aspects of subject, not brief mention and subject is notable when if either fulfills WP:GNG or WP:NBIO (in you case of biography). ✓ortexPhantom (talk) 14:44, 11 April 2026 (UTC)
Latest comment: 4 months ago2 comments2 people in discussion
Hi there, mentor! I'm a long-time Wikipedia reader but have only just decided to create an editor account and help contribute where there's gaps. The issue is, as a newcomer, there's a lot of information here to absorb and I'm a bit intimidated. I'm sure it becomes easier as I continue, but in the meantime, do you have any general advice for where to start besides the obvious auto-link suggestions & spelling/grammar fixes? Or even where to start to understand the core rules and complexities of this platform? Thank you for all the work you do! --DJLeamen (talk) 10:49, 12 April 2026 (UTC)
hi there! Firstly I want to thank you for joining wikipedia with aim to contribute. Many people reads wikipedia, out of readers, 1% join wikipedia, and out of joiners 1% contribute constantly. You are very rare, 1% of the readers. Wikipedia may look complex, but is very simple. Since you are new, I advise you to choose one field, where you want to contribute, there fields are writing and editing article on Wikipedia (most common), reviewing new edits that are mades across platform and choose that it doesn't disrupts purpose of Wikipedia (harassments, edits that are not sourced, test edits, deleting large section without any appropriate reason.
creating article that doesn't exist on wiki and you think it should be. Note: there are many, but these are most beginner friendly. Once you gain experience, you can move on to areas where advanced thinkings and knowledge of policies required. Out of fields I suggested, choose one of you like and msg here, I will tell steps that you should follow (for that particular area) ✓ortexPhantom (talk) 13:46, 12 April 2026 (UTC)
Latest comment: 4 months ago1 comment1 person in discussion
Hi there, and thank you for you help with NPP! I wanted to let you know that I have declined your G4 speedy deletion nomination of Kadri Bistrica because the current version is not sufficiently similar to the version deleted via discussion in 2016. One clear indicator is that the article includes two sources published after the deletion discussion, with one published in 2022 and another published in 2023. If you think Bistrica still does not meet Wikipedia's notability guidelines, feel free to renominate for deletion via AfD. Thank you! Significa liberdade (she/her) (talk) 14:05, 12 April 2026 (UTC)
Temporary account IP viewer granted
Latest comment: 4 months ago1 comment1 person in discussion
Hello, VortexPhantom. Per your request, your account has been grantedtemporary-account-viewer rights. You are now able to reveal the IP addresses of individuals using temporary accounts that are not visible to the general public. This is very sensitive information that is only to be used to aid in anti-abuse workflows. Please take a moment to review Wikipedia:Temporary account IP viewer for more information on this user right. It is important to remember:
Access must not be used for political control, to apply pressure on editors, or as a threat against another editor in a content dispute. There must be a valid reason to investigate a temporary user. Note that using multiple temporary accounts is not forbidden, so long as they are not used in violation of policies (for example, block or ban evasion).
It is also important to note that the following actions are logged for others to see:
When a user accepts the preference that enables or disables IP reveal for their account.
Revealing an IP address of a temporary account.
Listing the temporary accounts that are associated with one or more IP addresses (using the CIDR notation format).
Remember, even if a user is violating policy, avoid revealing personal information if possible. Use temporary account usernames rather than disclosing IP addresses directly, or give information such as same network/not same network or similar. If you do not want the user right anymore then please ask me or another administrator and it will be removed for you. You may also voluntarily give up access at any time by visiting Special:Preferences. Happy editing! HouseBlaster (talk • he/they)05:33, 14 April 2026 (UTC)
Kadri Bistrica
Latest comment: 4 months ago3 comments2 people in discussion
I don't know what happened, but the deletion log accidentally listed an old nom from 2016 instead of your second nomination. Might wanna go in and fix that. Ten Pound Hammer (they/them) • (What did I screw up now?)14:09, 15 April 2026 (UTC)
she asked me can I use your voice on the next intro and I said yes I got your back months later. I go up to the text messages and she delete what she said. So personally, she got a freebie from me. Last year i actually seen her in Providence, Rhode Island at Kulture and there should be videos on there May 31, 2025 on TikTok or other social media I would like to get some type of credit in reference where it’s due on Wikipedia about me as Andrew M Bencivenga best known as (Benz) BenzShiesty BenzShiesty (talk) 16:01, 15 April 2026 (UTC)
The Draw-Back (1927)
Latest comment: 4 months ago2 comments2 people in discussion
Latest comment: 4 months ago2 comments2 people in discussion
Hi @VortexPhantom, I saw you proposed Banjarkemantren railway station for deletion citing WP:GEO. Since this is a translation from the Indonesian Wikipedia, could you let me know what specific improvements would help this and future station articles meet English Wikipedia standards so that I can remove the one you've put and so that they can avoid PRODs in the future? Thanks! HPG01 (talk) 15:41, 19 April 2026 (UTC)
Latest comment: 4 months ago2 comments2 people in discussion
Good morning @VortexPhantom, you have cited "Doesn't meet WP:NCORP, probably written to advertise company and relies heavily on primary sources." for the LegaSea article. How should I fix the tone or structure to meet the standards on the article? It is my first article and I am not affiliated nor paid to write the article, it is simply creating a new article for an organisation in New Zealand that isn't featured on Wikipedia. If you can give me any suggestions it would be appreciated. ThomasNiuNiu (talk) 01:47, 20 April 2026 (UTC)
I assume that you are not connected to it, but even it doesn't follows neutral tone, it covers deeply about objective and activities of company, just like when written to promote it's ideology, products etc. Also, the article lack published books and article, or other materials from secondary reliable sources that have covered ORG with significant coverage, not just trivial mentions. You have added reference of company's own website which is classified as primary sources, which is not enough to establish notability. If you want to stop deletion, you may add reference of secondary reliable sources and improve tone, it may be saved. If only you establish notability, it will be saved, and even if other aspects are not good (such as tone), you will be given time to do that, so it is not a big concern. ✓ortexPhantom (talk) 10:05, 20 April 2026 (UTC)
If you want, I can move your sandbox to draft space, move correct location for drafts and it's reviewing or you may do it yourself. ✓ortexPhantom (talk) 15:05, 20 April 2026 (UTC)
The Signpost: 21 April 2026
Latest comment: 4 months ago1 comment1 person in discussion
Latest comment: 4 months ago5 comments2 people in discussion
Hello 👋
I'm a new editor here, could you help me with creating my user page and explain me how the wikitext in Wikipedia editor works? --Aranylat (talk) 10:30, 23 April 2026 (UTC)
Latest comment: 3 months ago1 comment1 person in discussion
Hello, I'm Qwerfjkl (bot). I have automatically detected that this edit performed by you, on the page Divyani Mondal, may have introduced referencing errors. They are as follows:
A generic name error. References show this error when author or editor name parameters use place-holder names. Please edit the article to include the source's actual author or editor name. (Fix | Ask for help)
Latest comment: 3 months ago4 comments3 people in discussion
Hello someone keeps reverting all of my edits even though I have added plenty of sources and have edited in good faith. Some of these edits have taken me a decently long time to make. What should I do? --TheJamesCycleContinues (talk) 18:12, 26 April 2026 (UTC)
Latest comment: 3 months ago2 comments2 people in discussion
Hi Vortex. Very excited to join you here, and start editing on Wikipedia. How exactly do I get my article I created approved? --4hgoat (talk) 12:37, 27 April 2026 (UTC)
If you are very new, I suggest you to complete some coyeditng task and improving a article, as it will make you more aware about editing using wikitext, citing reliable sources, as this will give you skills you will be needed on Wikipedia and getting your article approved. ✓ortexPhantom (talk) 12:48, 27 April 2026 (UTC)
May 2026 Administrator Election – Call for Candidates
Latest comment: 3 months ago1 comment1 person in discussion
The administrator elections process has officially started! Interested editors are encouraged to self-nominate or arrange to be nominated by reviewing the instructions at Wikipedia:Administrator elections/May 2026/Candidates.
Here is the schedule:
April 29 – May 5: Call for candidates
May 8–12: Discussion phase
May 13–19: SecurePoll voting phase
Please note the following:
The requirements to run are identical to RFA—a prospective candidate must be extended confirmed.
The process will have a seven day call for candidates phase, a two day pause, a five day discussion phase, and a seven day private vote using SecurePoll. Discussion and questions are only allowed on the candidate pages during the discussion phase.
The outcome of this process is identical to making a request for adminship. There is no official difference between an administrator appointed through RFA versus administrator elections.
Ask any questions about the process at the talk page. Later, a user talk message will be sent to official candidates with additional information about the process.
If you are interested in the process, please make sure to watchlist the appropriate pages. A watchlist notice will be added when the discussion phase opens, and again when the voting phase opens.
You're receiving this message because you signed up for the mailing list. To opt-out of future mailings, please remove yourself from the list.
Latest comment: 3 months ago2 comments2 people in discussion
Hello! I wanted to let you know I just declined a WP:G5 you placed on an article. It's easy to make mistakes with that criterion. It requires the user to have been blocked or banned at the time of article creation. The sockmaster was only blocked a few days ago, while the article was created in January. Hope that helps! —Femke 🐦 (talk) 09:10, 2 May 2026 (UTC)
Latest comment: 3 months ago5 comments2 people in discussion
Hi Vortex! I've edited a page before, to make a song title accurate, but it got taken down, any reason as to why it might have? --987.btw (talk) 07:54, 3 May 2026 (UTC)
I edited the "Lets start here" album name by Lil Yachty, just to see and test if Wikepedia is actually editable, i noticed the name of the songs on the website were not accurate with the actual name of the song on some of the streaming sites, so naturally I changed it (with an anonymous account at the time). So I went back the next day to check and the edits were gone. 987.btw (talk) 11:18, 3 May 2026 (UTC)
Latest comment: 3 months ago1 comment1 person in discussion
hey dude just wondering on this page there's a lot of Pakistani words and the their not popping up in a online Pakistani dictionary so just wondering what should i do
Changes to user permissions made from Meta are now included in the local user permissions log (T6055).
The autoconfirmed user group will soon be modified such that the four-day account age requirement begins when an account makes its first edit (T418484).
Arbitration
The arbitration case SchroCat has been opened. Evidence submissions in this case closed on 15 April.
Per a recent motion, appeals of blocks from the conflict-of-interest VRT queue are, by default, appealed on-wiki through the normal unblock process. However, they may be heard by the Committee if COIVRTers disagree on the interpretation of the evidence or believe ArbCom would be better suited to hear the appeal. Administrators are also advised that loosening or lifting such blocks without the consent of someone with access to the queue or ArbCom can be grounds for desysopping.
Per a recent motion, restrictions issued directly by the Committee may now be enforced with blocks which work exactly like contentious topic blocks.
Latest comment: 3 months ago1 comment1 person in discussion
Hi, this is an automated reminder as part of Global reminder bot to let you know that your permission "patroller" (New page reviewers) will expire on 00:00, 10 May 2026 (UTC). For most rights, you will need to renew at WP:PERM, unless you have been told otherwise when your right was approved. To opt out of user right expiry notifications, add yourself to m:Global reminder bot/Exclusion.Leaderbot (talk) 19:41, 3 May 2026 (UTC)
New page reviewer granted
Latest comment: 3 months ago1 comment1 person in discussion
Hi VortexPhantom, I just wanted to let you know that I have added the new page reviewer user right to your account. This means you now have access to the page curation tools and can start patrolling pages from the new pages feed. If you asked for this at requests for permissions, please check back there to see if your access is time-limited or if there are other comments.
This is a good time to re-acquaint yourself with the guidance at Wikipedia:New pages patrol. Before you get started, please take the time to:
Latest comment: 3 months ago2 comments2 people in discussion
Hi mentor! It really does feel like I just became a green lantern and I have to earn my ring. Can you give me some advice as I’m starting out? --AllLantern (talk) 02:15, 8 May 2026 (UTC)
On 13 May, we will start the voting phase. The candidate subpages will close to public questions and discussion, and everyone will have a week to use the SecurePoll software to vote, which uses a secret ballot. You can see who voted, but not who they voted for.
Any questions or issues can be asked on the election talk page. Thank you for your participation. Happy electing.
You're receiving this message because you signed up for the mailing list. To opt-out of future mailings, please remove yourself from the list.
Latest comment: 3 months ago4 comments2 people in discussion
Hi there. I was looking at some user pages and found yours and I noticed one of the images there is massive. I wasn't sure if you intended for this to happen but I thought it would be nice to give you a heads up!
I am in fact on mobile right now and it does look normal. So for your info this is a desktop issue. Not too sure how this can be fixed but I thought this is good info to know. Glamerous23456 (talk) 04:09, 9 May 2026 (UTC)
Latest comment: 3 months ago2 comments2 people in discussion
Hello! I want to learn how to properly create a Wikipedia page for a politician. Could you please guide me on the notability requirements, reliable sources needed, and the correct process to avoid deletion or conflict-of-interest issues? Thank you. --Anarulkhaled69 (talk) 14:35, 9 May 2026 (UTC)