User talk:Whlee/archive1

Latest comment: 17 years ago by Cydevil38 in topic History of Manchuria template

Welcome!

edit

Hello Whlee/archive1, and a belated Welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some good places to get you started!

 

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please be sure to sign your name on talk pages by using four tildes (~~~~) to produce your name and the current date, or just three tildes (~~~) to produce your name only. If you have any questions, or are worried/confused about anything at all, please either visit the help desk, or leave a new message on my talk page at any time. Happy editing, good luck, and remember: Be Bold!

FireFox T C 13:36, 2 October 2005 (UTC) Reply

Barnstar

edit
 
I, FireFox hereby award you this Minor Barnstar for all your brilliant minor edits!

Seven-Year War Campaignboxes

edit

I see you've split off the Seven-Year War campaignbox; could you please add whichever campaignboxes you've created to the list at Wikipedia:WikiProject Battles/Campaignboxes? Thank you. LordAmeth 15:32, 3 October 2005 (UTC)Reply

edit

Hello, Whlee. I was wondering if you wrote, or have permission to use, the content in the First Koryo - Khitan article because it is similar to an article on the Korean History Project website. Thanks -- Kjkolb 05:28, 9 October 2005 (UTC)Reply

I understand what you are talking about, i recongnize the fact that the article is poorly written but i'm very busy these last few days. I will personalize it the following days when i got much more available extra-time. Regards. Whlee 10:24, 9 October 2005 (UTC)Reply

Castles in Japan

edit

Hi Whlee,

Thank you for adding information to the article Castles in Japan. May I suggest creating a new article? Japanese castles in Korea would be a good title. It would be very informative and valuable. You can copy directly from Castles in Japan into the new article. I always enjoy creating new articles and hope you do, too.

Thanks again,

Fg2 11:39, 23 June 2006 (UTC)Reply

Hello Korean editor

edit

안녕하세요

Hello, it seems to me that you know several languages (?).

It is great to (finally) see a Korean editor who is very enthusiastic about Korean articles!

Check out Portal:Korea for Korean stubs or needed articles. This is just one way to help out.

Thanks for helping out at the Imjin War or Korea itself. It is a heavy burden for me to do all the work because none of the editors are willing to write in detailed sections about the war. This is also the case for Korea and its history.

...Unlike the Japan article, which is extremely outstanding with many editors. I hope we can bring the Korea article equal or above to the Japan article. That is my overall goal and I hope we can do it.

Thanks, Good friend100 17:38, 12 July 2006 (UTC)Reply

db-noncom

edit

When you uploaded various images recently you selected the copyright holder only allows this work to be used for non-commercial and/or educational purposes. This automatically includes {{permission from license selector}} in the image description. You clearly did not look at the image descriptions created by the upload. I suggest you read the template now and follow its advice. Also, if the licence allows it, please upload to the Commons so all languages can share. -- RHaworth 01:08, 30 August 2006 (UTC)Reply

TfD nomination of Template:Campaignbox Japanese Blitzkrieg in Korea

edit

Template:Campaignbox Japanese Blitzkrieg in Korea has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for Deletion page. Thank you.--GracenotesT § 23:12, 6 January 2007 (UTC)Reply

Anju and Olga

edit

Hi, Whlee! I think you misunderstood the nature of my edit. I never argued against the fact that Anju existed many years before modern Olga or advocated that Anju and Olga are the same thing. My point was that there was nothing there by the times Russians showed up in 1860, as Anju ceased to exist long before then. Now, I don't have any references handy to back that up at the moment, but from what I know Russians founded Olga in an uninhabited location. Of course, modern Olga is not the same as ancient Anju, but since as Anju existed on the same territory as Olga (and since you yourself think that mentioning this in the article about Olga is appropriate), it's only fair to inform readers about this. The way your edit is constructed, however, readers might get the impression that ancient Anju eventually developed into modern Olga, which is incorrect. If you have suggestions as to how to word the article better, I'll gladly hear them out.—Ëzhiki (Igels Hérissonovich Ïzhakoff-Amursky) • (yo?); 16:07, 19 February 2007 (UTC)Reply

Thanks! It sounds a lot better now.—Ëzhiki (Igels Hérissonovich Ïzhakoff-Amursky) • (yo?); 16:32, 19 February 2007 (UTC)Reply

Administrative divisions of Primorsky Krai

edit

Hi, Whlee! This is a courtesy note to let you know that I reverted your recent edits to administrative divisions of Primorsky Krai and left an explanation here.

If the topic of administrative divisions of Russia interests you and you wish to improve the article mentioned above, please take a look at administrative divisions of Adygea (and at its version which is currently being revised). That one is a featured list, and it should give you ideas as to in which direction the improvements of other articles of the series should go.

Feel free to contact me should you have any questions. Best,—Ëzhiki (Igels Hérissonovich Ïzhakoff-Amursky) • (yo?); 19:58, 21 February 2007 (UTC)Reply

Districts of Khabarovsk Krai

edit

Sure. The most southern one is, as you correctly determined, Bikinsky District. The one immediately to the north is Vyazemsky District. The big one to the north and east is Lazo District. The one to the northwest of it (bordering with China) is Khabarovsky District. The one to the north of Lazo District and Khabarovsky District (and which is about the same size as Lazo District) is Nanaysky District. Finally, the one south-east of Nanaysky District is Sovetsko-Gavansky District. Verkhnebureinsky District is the one bordering Amur Oblast in the west and the Jewish AO in the south. If you follow the western border of Khabarovsk Krai , it will be the seventh district from south to north (the biggest one in southern Khabarovsk Krai).

Let me know if you need anything else!—Ëzhiki (Igels Hérissonovich Ïzhakoff-Amursky) • (yo?); 20:32, 21 February 2007 (UTC)Reply

French wikipedia

edit

As a French Parisian user of wikipedia, I have seen that you live in France and have also contributed to some French pages. I think that French wikipedia pages about Korean history are very poor, so I would like to know whether you would be interested by a cooperation concerning the French version of wikipedia (history, creation of a gate and a wikiproject and so on). Sorry for having spoken about it on this page, but I didn't find an email valid address to write you directly. Sincerely, Kim976 10:31, 23 February 2007 (UTC).Reply

안녕 하심니까. 저는 빠리지안 사람 아니구요 암튼... I could be interested in your cooperation. but i'm not familiar with wiki-tools yet such wikiproject. Therefore i'm wating for the portal and then i would add articles once achieved. RegardsWhlee 13:34, 23 February 2007 (UTC)Reply
안녕 하심니까. Thank you for your answer. I am not much more familiar with wikiproject and other wikitools. To begin with, it would be possible to make links to pages which would have to be completed such as "Invasions japonaises de la Corée" on fr:wikipedia, if you could contribute. Best regards Kim976 20:34, 24 February 2007 (UTC). Hum... just one question : why having written Paris with "빠" : it is the North Korean standard writing, isn't it ? Kim976 12:08, 26 February 2007 (UTC)Reply
I will contribute to French version of Imjin Waeran later. Paris is often written by Korean living in France like "빠리" instead of "파리". i dunno whether i replied or not to your request. Whlee 17:21, 6 March 2007 (UTC)Reply
As a matter of fact, "빠" much more corresponds to the precise pronunciationKim976 18:10, 7 March 2007 (UTC).Reply

Dalnegorsk

edit

Hi there! Just wanted to drop you a quick note regarding this and other similar edits of yours. What [[Category:Balhae|*]] means is that the article you are categorizing is the main article in the Balhae category. Normally, there is only one article marked such, and in this case it would be Balhae itself. Dalnegorsk and all other places of Primorsky Krai should be categorized simply [[Category:Balhae]], i.e., without a sort key. Best,—Ëzhiki (Igels Hérissonovich Ïzhakoff-Amursky) • (yo?); 16:34, 28 February 2007 (UTC) Hope that answer to you request. I'm not familiar with thoses tools regardsWhlee 16:41, 28 February 2007 (UTC) I will correct all of them then Whlee 16:42, 28 February 2007 (UTC)Reply

No problem. Someone would have caught this sooner or later anyway. Best,—Ëzhiki (Igels Hérissonovich Ïzhakoff-Amursky) • (yo?); 16:46, 28 February 2007 (UTC)Reply

Thanks

edit

Thanks. --Nlu (talk) 14:51, 5 March 2007 (UTC)Reply

Bonjour

edit

안녕하십니까 이우호씨. Bonjour monsieur Woo. Je suis un nationalist libre de coree. I just met you on the WP:Korea page, so I just wanted to say hello to you. We have a weird concidence in similarities. I can speak Korean and French also, and etc. Since you can speak numerous languages, would you like to join the AIW (Association of International Wikipedians)? My goal as an IW (International Wikipedian) is to make all versions of Wikipedia contain the same articles, therefore sharing the knowledge not just with one's country, but the entire world. Although it will take a lot of time and effort to make all Wikipedias "same" and global, if many people contribute, it will come true. The only thing that I do not like about Wikipedia is that each versions of Wikipedia is "seperated" and not united as one. Would you like to help create Wikipedia a global Wikipedia? If you have any thoughts in beocomming an IW, please contact me on my talk page. I have an account on the French version of Wikipedia, known as Orthodoxi, and I also have accounts on sevral other versions of Wikipedia. Merci. Orthodoxy 22:40, 5 March 2007 (UTC)Reply

예, 국제위키백과인이 된것을 환영합니다. 국제위키백과협회 유저박스는 지금 만들고 있는중이라. 잠시만 기다려 주세요. 햐튼, 많은 감사 드립니다. And I just wanted to make a little change. No offense, I am just correcting your grammar mistakes. My French level is no better than your Korean level, so, do not think that it is a bad thing.

아녀하세요 자기 사용자 패이지 오신것을 환영합니다 ! = 안녕하세요. 저의 사용자이지에 오신것을 환영합니다! Orthodoxy 19:48, 6 March 2007 (UTC)Reply

Balhae Rulers

edit

대이진과 대건황이 장왕과 안왕이라는 정확한 증거를 제시해주십시오. 아직 까진 정설이 아니지 않습니까?(심지어는 교과서를 봐도 그렇고요...) Korea history 14:31, 6 March 2007 (UTC) 영어로 하세요 제가 한국말은 잘 못 알아들으니까. 감사합니다 ! Whlee 14:35, 6 March 2007 (UTC)Reply

대이진 and 대건황→Why 장왕 and 안왕? What is your authority for that statement? consult a Korea history textbook, 장왕 and 안왕 is probably not true. 영어를 잘 못해서 틀린말이 많을껍니다. 이해해주세요.

---Korea history 14:50, 6 March 2007 (UTC)Reply

안녕 하십니까, 다름이 아니라 제가 편집한 Battle of Kwiju를 편집해 주십시오. (문법에 맞게 고쳐 주십시오.) 감사합니다.

Korea history 15:01, 19 April 2007 (UTC)Reply

거이 고쳤다Whlee 17:13, 19 April 2007 (UTC)Reply

List of Chieftains of the Jurchens

edit

Grüezi wohl ! I was starting to write that article and you quickly conclude that it was an Unneeded listcruft one, i also add a relevant reference as well, many Chinese references also exist. Do not anticipate so quickly. Wiedersehen ! Whlee 13:41, 14 March 2007 (UTC)Reply

You may want to have more content ready before you start an artile next time OR tag the article as under construction. I think the speedy was perfectly justified at the moment of tagging. In any case, no harm done.
PS: You should read Plenk. ~ | twsx | talkcont | 16:46, 14 March 2007 (UTC)Reply

Counter

edit

I can't believe you actually went through my user page history and counted how many times it was vandalized :)) Last time I used this box I counted ten times; has it been that many more since then? Wow.

You're welcome :)

Anyway, just so you know, I am actually trying to keep the clutter on my userpage to minimum (and doing terrible job at that), but I guess I'll keep this particular userbox for a while so your efforts are not wasted :) Best,—Ëzhiki (Igels Hérissonovich Ïzhakoff-Amursky) • (yo?); 16:02, 30 March 2007 (UTC)Reply

Spasiva :) Whlee 16:15, 24 April 2007 (UTC)Reply

History of Manchuria

edit

Sorry for the delayed response; while I have my archived talk watchlisted, I don't check back very often. In other words, I saw your note but promptly forgot about it :)

Anyway, I think what you did here will indeed be of great help in organizing articles about the history of the Far East. It is a far better approach than the one I took way back in 2004, when I wrote history of Primorsky Krai, which, for the most part, has nothing to do with Primorsky Krai proper. Back then, however, there really wasn't much in the English Wikipedia on Manchuria, so Primorsky Krai history seemed to be the best place to put this information. Now, of course, Wikipedia grew and many topics which were previously not covered are there.

By the way, would you be interested in splitting history of Primorsky Krai properly? What that article really needs is a (very) brief overview of pre-Russian history, with links to main articles, and a solid body of text on history of actual Primorsky Krai (i.e., from 1938 onward). Maybe this will finally give me a push to finish what I started in 2004 :) Best,—Ëzhiki (Igels Hérissonovich Ïzhakoff-Amursky) • (yo?); 16:19, 30 March 2007 (UTC)Reply

I will most certainly help where I can, but please note that my knowledge of the history of Manchuria is rather limited and whatever I know, I know from the Russian point of view. All in all, I know something about the part of history that's related to the territory of Primorsky Krai, but very little beyond that. Also, I cannot read any of the Asian languages.
That the reason why it is very intersting to get Russian point of view !Khabarovsk Krai and beyond have also their own history, they are written in Cyrillics but the problem is that words pronouciations are Tungusic but anyway i'm "confident" about Russians sources.
As for the Cyrillic alphabet, learning it is quite easy. I'm sure you'll be able to fluently read it after less than a week of flashcard drilling. You won't, of course, understand much, but you'll have sufficient knowledge to figure out that "Вяземский", for example, is "Vyazemsky". It's only 33 letters, and a good chunk of them looks the same as the letters in the Latin alphabet. It took me about a month to learn how to read hiragana and katakana a while back; Cyrillics is easier to learn by at least a degree of magnitude.
Sure it would be easy to "read Cyrillics" alphabet remeber i tried to reorganize Administration divisions of Prmiorye but as you taught me on that article admnistration system was a bit different, i did not know that because of my lacking knowledge in Russian, of course, on the other hand Russian is your mother tongue, we are therefore able complementing ou skills each other along with other Wikipedian in keeping a NPOV and communicating via English too thanks too Wikipedia !
To summarize, here is what I can help with: 1) helping figure out Cyrillics and location of objects on the territory of Russia; and 2) administrative and maintenance tasks (moving/renaming/splitting articles). Just let me know whenever you need help with any of these. Cheers,—Ëzhiki (Igels Hérissonovich Ïzhakoff-Amursky) • (yo?); 17:24, 30 March 2007 (UTC)Reply
Ok let's start slowly but steady and surely. Regards.Whlee 17:44, 30 March 2007 (UTC)Reply
Sure, just give me a holler once you have anything you need me to look at. Thanks!—Ëzhiki (Igels Hérissonovich Ïzhakoff-Amursky) • (yo?); 17:55, 30 March 2007 (UTC)Reply

Sources

edit

Interesting, the Russian Wikipedia uses "Пархэ" instead of "Бохай". I did not see the former used much in the books I read.

As for the FEGI source, that one is most certainly reliable. Do you need that passage translated, or just need a general idea of what it's about?—Ëzhiki (Igels Hérissonovich Ïzhakoff-Amursky) • (yo?); 18:39, 30 March 2007 (UTC)Reply

It will help you to understand balhae/bohai culture and what occrus at the moment on Talk:Balhae
As you just quote here start the problem of "渤海"'s hisdtory :

- pronounced Balhae by Korean (Пархэ) - or pronounced Bohai by Chinese (Бохай) :) Have fun ! It would be interesting to get Russian and Tungusic (aboriginies/autochtones) peoples point of view. I hope they would be neutral in that conflict of ideology.Whlee 18:47, 30 March 2007 (UTC) That the reason why i would like to learn Russian and Tungusic languages like ManchuReply

Jin in Primorye

edit

Ah, gotcha. Цзинь (bottom part)=Jin, Хэйшуй (top left)=Heishui, Мохэ (top right)=Mohe.—Ëzhiki (Igels Hérissonovich Ïzhakoff-Amursky) • (yo?); 21:53, 30 March 2007 (UTC) GREAT THANKS !!! I JUST ADD NEW LINKS RELATED TO THAT TOPICReply

Manchus

edit

Sorry for the delayed message, I've been busy with work lately but I'll try to help out as much as I can. By the way great job on bringing information about the Jurchens onto the English wikipedia. Abstrakt 02:09, 1 April 2007 (UTC)Reply

You're welcome. Hope that my contribution would help us to made Manchurian History rich and attractive ! :)Whlee 16:18, 24 April 2007 (UTC)Reply

Article about Kurów on Manchu language

edit

Could you please write a stub about Kurów here - just a few sentences based on http://zh.wikipedia.org/wiki/%E5%BA%93%E9%B2%81%E5%A4%AB%E5%B8%82 or EN wiki? Only 3-5 sentences enough. Please. Pietras1988 TALK 18:47, 7 April 2007 (UTC)


Why do you want an article of Kurow on all Wikipedias??? I really want to know that. SPQRobin 23:46, 9 April 2007 (CEST)
Yes... give us a good reason?!!? Do widzenia ! Whlee 11:57, 10 April 2007 (CEST)
Beside to this its the second time you asked me a such request ! Click here !

License tagging for Image:Oei Invasion.jpg

edit

Thanks for uploading Image:Oei Invasion.jpg. Wikipedia gets thousands of images uploaded every day, and in order to verify that the images can be legally used on Wikipedia, the source and copyright status must be indicated. Images need to have an image tag applied to the image description page indicating the copyright status of the image. This uniform and easy-to-understand method of indicating the license status allows potential re-users of the images to know what they are allowed to do with the images.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

This is an automated notice by OrphanBot. If you need help on selecting a tag to use, or in adding the tag to the image description, feel free to post a message at Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. 13:07, 13 April 2007 (UTC)

Proceeding with the Goguryeo mediation

edit

Hello! : )

This is Daniel Bryant and Armed Blowfish from the Mediation Committee, and as you may be aware, we are mediating the Goguryeo Mediation Committee case.

We are sending you this message as you are one of the involved parties in this dispute. Recently, a private wiki was set up for private mediation by the Mediation Committee. As noted by the Mediation Committee policy on confidentiality, mediation is confidential, and therefore the Committee has decided in this case to hold all mediation discussions in this case on the private wiki. Therefore, we need you to get an account so the case can proceed.

To request an account on the private Mediation Wiki, please click this link to email Armed Blowfish. Please include "Goguryeo" somewhere in the subject, e.g. "Private wiki account request for Goguryeo mediation", to note that this email has highest priority. If you do not have email enabled on your account and are unable to use the mail feature, please let us know on Armed Blowfish's talk page.

Thank you so much,
Daniel Bryant and Armed Blowfish (mail), 04:41, 26 April 2007 (UTC)Reply

Would it be possible for you to do what is outlined above as soon as possible? Many of the parties are itching to begin, and it'd be great if you could get on board too. Cheers, Daniel Bryant 05:38, 4 May 2007 (UTC)Reply

Hello! Since you have not picked another method for creating an account, here is your account information:

I put the current mediation pages on your Watchlist, but pay attention to the Noticeboard, as there will be more in the future.

Note that you will need to change your password as soon as possible, and then confirm on Wikipedia that you have in fact taken your account, as a security measure.

Thanks,
Armed Blowfish (mail) 03:20, 7 May 2007 (UTC)Reply

Image tagging for Image:Namhae_Waesong.JPG

edit

Thanks for uploading Image:Namhae_Waesong.JPG. The image has been identified as not specifying the source and creator of the image, which is required by Wikipedia's policy on images. If you don't indicate the source and creator of the image on the image's description page, it may be deleted some time in the next seven days. If you have uploaded other images, please verify that you have provided source information for them as well.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

This is an automated notice by OrphanBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. 09:03, 1 May 2007 (UTC)Reply

Locality to the north of Kamen-Rybolov

edit

I take it's the one immediately to the north of Kamen-Rybolov. It's not a city, it's a village (selo) of Troitskoye (Троицкое).—Ëzhiki (Igels Hérissonovich Ïzhakoff-Amursky) • (yo?); 18:29, 2 May 2007 (UTC)Reply

Wow, that looks like quite a bit of work! It will definitely be very useful. Thanks!—Ëzhiki (Igels Hérissonovich Ïzhakoff-Amursky) • (yo?); 11:56, 3 May 2007 (UTC)Reply
Once again—great work! One way to improve it would be citing the references you used. As for the Russian portion of it, I am planning to go through it when I have time. Thanks once more for the terrific job!—Ëzhiki (Igels Hérissonovich Ïzhakoff-Amursky) • (yo?); 14:36, 10 May 2007 (UTC)Reply

Mediation

edit

Hello! We believe enough participants have signed up for us to begin mediation. However, if you have not yet signed up for the MediationWiki, please do so.

Those of you who have signed up can log in at the following URL using the username and password sent in your account creation email: http://www.southportbeekeepers.co.uk/medcom/index.php?title=Special:Userlogin&returnto=Goguryeo:Noticeboard

Be sure to watchlist this page, if you have not done so already, and check it regularly: http://www.southportbeekeepers.co.uk/medcom/index.php/Goguryeo:Noticeboard

There are questions for you to answer here, and you should watchlist this as well: http://www.southportbeekeepers.co.uk/medcom/index.php/Goguryeo:Opening

Thanks!

Armed Blowfish and Daniel Bryant, 07:11, 8 May 2007 (UTC)Reply

History of Manchuria template

edit

I think renaming it to "Northeast China" is too contentious and in the end not going to work. To address the points you have made, which I believe are valid, how about reverting the name to "History of Manchuria", and providing sub-defintions of "present day Northeast China" and "present day Primosrky Krai", and any other modern political/geographical entities that historic Manchuria are divided into? Cydevil38 00:49, 11 May 2007 (UTC)Reply

have a look at those templates : we are trying to find an outcome :
-Template:History of Northeast China
-Template:History of Russian Manchuria
RegardsWhlee 09:54, 11 May 2007 (UTC)Reply
The History of Manchuria template has been only inserted as a compromise to put an end to a revert war, which I believe was at the cost of the integrity of the article. An independent historiography of Manchuria is a minority view. And going further to divide this into two other non-historic entities, I believe, is only worse. In other words, treating Northeast China and Russian Manchuria as historic entities is even more controversial than treating Manchuria as a historic entity. Additionally, using a "Northeast China" history template would be to some extent adopting China's Northeast Project. Cydevil38 23:58, 11 May 2007 (UTC)Reply
Anyways, I'll partially revert your changes, while addressing some of your valid points. Cydevil38 00:01, 12 May 2007 (UTC)Reply

The History of Manchuria was offered in place for insistance of some CPOV editors that a History of China should be placed on a kingdom that is considered by most NPOV sources to be non-Chinese. Having some historiography of Northeast China would be doing serious disservice to the integrity of Wikipedia, as it's a very modern political entity, not a historic or geographic entity. It would be like having a history template of "South Korea" or "Siberia". The majority consensus was on a History of Manchuria, not Northeast China.[1] Cydevil38 00:34, 13 May 2007 (UTC)Reply

저는 그 인간 무시한지 오래입니다. 어설트의 콘트리브 중 첫 콘트리브를 한번 보세요. 한국인들을 인종적으로 비하하는 하는 사람에게서 큰 기대를 하는것 자체가 무리죠. 그리고 그 사람은 무슨 캐리어처럼 가는 곳 마다 소크퍼펫이 난무하더군요. 요즘 제가 노력하는 바는 중국이 주장하는 것은 확실하게 중국이 주장하는 것이라고 명시하는 것입니다. Cydevil38 22:13, 14 May 2007 (UTC)Reply
About your Manchurian historiography, I think it's pretty good, you've put a lot of effort in to it. However, I think it's missing some important elements, such as proto-Korean ethnicities like the Ye and the Maek tribes. Also, I think it'd be a good idea to include some important archaeological entities like Hongshan and Xiajiadian cultures, like the Jeulmun and Mumun pottery culture in the History of Korea template. Cydevil38 22:13, 14 May 2007 (UTC)Reply

I'm not the best person to ask for opinions for the History of Manchuria, as I only have some knowledge on periods where Koreans were involved in that part of the regional history. Also, I'm involved in the Goguryeo dispute and that's already a strain for my work and daily life. But I'll drop by sometime when the time allows. Oh, and by the way, we're from the same clan :) Cydevil38 22:39, 16 May 2007 (UTC)Reply

I can understand your point of view, I also have some knowledge on periods where Koreans were involved in that part of the regional history, but i'm trying to expand them. The same clan? 무순 쓰리야, Cydevil38 님 의 성 및 이름 뭐애요?Whlee 07:07, 18 May 2007 (UTC)Reply
I mean I'm also the descendent of Taejo of Joseon. Cydevil38 21:24, 18 May 2007 (UTC)Reply

Priamurye

edit

Hi, Whlee! What you described as "zenglobing" is called "Priamurye" in Russian. This term, however, does not refer to any particular entity, nor does it have defined borders. It is mostly used in history and geography books to refer to the area around the Amur River.

As for the Russian Far East (RFE), that is a geographic term as well, not an official entity of any sort. In general, RFE is considered to include all Russian territories to the east of Siberia. Sometimes, however, Far Eastern Federal District (an officially defined entity) is referred to as "RFE", which is probably where confusion lies. It would not really be correct to say that Far Eastern Federal District "includes" RFE (at least not formally), as the terms apply to different concepts (the former being a modern political entity, and the latter—a geographical and historical concept). Hope this helps. Best,—Ëzhiki (Igels Hérissonovich Ïzhakoff-Amursky) • (yo?); 19:42, 14 May 2007 (UTC)Reply