User talk:Wikipicked/Archive 1

Archive 1

CS1 error on Swasika

Hello, I'm Qwerfjkl (bot). I have automatically detected that this edit performed by you, on the page Swasika, may have introduced referencing errors. They are as follows:

• A generic name error. References show this error when author or editor name parameters use placeholder names, or the name of the newspaper or organisation, instead of the source's actual author or editor name. If no human author is given, the fields should be removed. (Fix | Ask for help). Below are the references causing this error:
  • Desk, Cinema Express (2026-06-09). "Ravi Teja-Shiva Nirvana's Irumudi locks its release date". The New Indian Express. Retrieved 2026-07-11. {{cite web}}: |last= has generic name (help)

Please check this page and fix the errors highlighted. If you think this is a false positive, you can report it to my operator. Thanks, Qwerfjkl (bot) (talk) 16:58, 11 July 2026 (UTC)

CS1 error on Ajay Ghosh

Hello, I'm Qwerfjkl (bot). I have automatically detected that this edit performed by you, on the page Ajay Ghosh, may have introduced referencing errors. They are as follows:

• A generic name error. References show this error when author or editor name parameters use placeholder names, or the name of the newspaper or organisation, instead of the source's actual author or editor name. If no human author is given, the fields should be removed. (Fix | Ask for help). Below are the references causing this error:
  • Desk, Cinema Express (2026-06-09). "Ravi Teja-Shiva Nirvana's Irumudi locks its release date". The New Indian Express. Retrieved 2026-07-11. {{cite web}}: |last= has generic name (help)

Please check this page and fix the errors highlighted. If you think this is a false positive, you can report it to my operator. Thanks, Qwerfjkl (bot) (talk) 16:59, 11 July 2026 (UTC)

CS1 error on Raaka (film)

Hello, I'm Qwerfjkl (bot). I have automatically detected that this edit performed by you, on the page Raaka (film), may have introduced referencing errors. They are as follows:

• A generic name error. References show this error when author or editor name parameters use placeholder names, or the name of the newspaper or organisation, instead of the source's actual author or editor name. If no human author is given, the fields should be removed. (Fix | Ask for help). Below are the references causing this error:
  • Desk, Cinema Express (2026-07-05). "Sai Abhyankkar on Raaka collaboration: 'Allu Arjun has great musical ears…'". Cinema Express. Retrieved 2026-07-13. {{cite web}}: |last= has generic name (help)

Please check this page and fix the errors highlighted. If you think this is a false positive, you can report it to my operator. Thanks, Qwerfjkl (bot) (talk) 04:52, 13 July 2026 (UTC)

CS1 error on Rape in India

Hello, I'm Qwerfjkl (bot). I have automatically detected that this edit performed by you, on the page Rape in India, may have introduced referencing errors. They are as follows:

• A generic name error. References show this error when author or editor name parameters use placeholder names, or the name of the newspaper or organisation, instead of the source's actual author or editor name. If no human author is given, the fields should be removed. (Fix | Ask for help). Below are the references causing this error:
  • Correspondent, Legal (13 April 2019). "Sex on false promise of marriage is rape: Supreme Court". The Hindu. Retrieved 14 April 2019. {{cite news}}: |last= has generic name (help)

Please check this page and fix the errors highlighted. If you think this is a false positive, you can report it to my operator. Thanks, Qwerfjkl (bot) (talk) 11:45, 13 July 2026 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Raaka (film)

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.

You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Raaka (film) requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G4 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page appears to be a repost of material that was previously deleted following a deletion discussion, at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/AA22xA6. When a page has substantially identical content to that of a page deleted after a discussion, and any changes in the content do not address the reasons for which the material was previously deleted, it may be deleted at any time.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here.

* Pppery * _{in solidarity} 03:30, 12 July 2026 (UTC)

Thanks for the intimation. I have initiated a request to relook into the matter of deleting the article. You may participate if you wish to do so here. Wikipicked (talk) 11:58, 13 July 2026 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Raaka (film)

A tag has been placed on Raaka (film) requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done for the following reason:

It is in the draft space as Draft:Raaka, and that is because of an AfD

Under the criteria for speedy deletion, pages that meet certain criteria may be deleted at any time.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. Kailash29792 (talk) 06:18, 15 July 2026 (UTC)

The Afd was on a different issue, please go through the edit summary here. And a recently created CSD was dismissed after contested deletion. Wikipicked (talk) 07:16, 15 July 2026 (UTC)

Nomination of Raaka (film) for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Raaka (film) is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article is being discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Raaka (film) until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may still edit the article, including to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the AfD notice from the article until the discussion is closed.

CNMall41 (talk) 07:28, 15 July 2026 (UTC)

You can add WP:BLUDGEONING to the warnings you removed. Experienced editors were attempted to guide you on this. --CNMall41 (talk) 07:33, 15 July 2026 (UTC)

You mean, I can add WP:BLUDGEONING in the edit summary of those warnings? I have fixed the warnings and then removed the notice as addressed. Wikipicked (talk) 08:15, 15 July 2026 (UTC)

Dragon (2027 film) moved to draftspace

Thanks for your contributions to Dragon (2027 film) 2. Unfortunately, I do not think it is ready for publishing as a live article at this time because it needs more sources to establish notability. I have converted it to a draft which you can improve, undisturbed for a while.

Please see more information at Help:Unreviewed new page. When the article is ready for publication, please click on the "Submit the draft for review!" button at the top of the page OR move the page back. CNMall41 (talk) 01:14, 16 July 2026 (UTC)

I have sent you a note about a page you started

Hi Wikipicked. Thank you for your work on Rasha Thadani. Another editor, Mariamnei, has reviewed it as part of new pages patrol and left the following comment:

Nice start!

To reply, leave a comment here and begin it with {{Re|Mariamnei}}. (Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

Mariamnei ✦ ^{reach out 🕊️} 12:53, 16 July 2026 (UTC)

Thank you for that! Wikipicked (talk) 17:35, 16 July 2026 (UTC)

Srinivasa Mangapuram moved to draftspace

Thanks for your contributions to Srinivasa Mangapuram. Unfortunately, I do not think it is ready for publishing as a live article at this time because Fails NFF. once released and there are reviews it may.. I have converted it to a draft which you can improve, undisturbed for a while.

Please see more information at Help:Unreviewed new page. When the article is ready for publication, please click on the "Submit the draft for review!" button at the top of the page OR move the page back. CNMall41 (talk) 20:06, 16 July 2026 (UTC)

Nomination of Dragon (2027 film) for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Dragon (2027 film) is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article is being discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Dragon (2027 film) until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may still edit the article, including to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the AfD notice from the article until the discussion is closed.

CNMall41 (talk) 20:04, 16 July 2026 (UTC)

Based on your editing behavior, it is clear this is not your first time editing Wikipedia. Please disclose all accounts you have previously used. --CNMall41 (talk) 20:05, 16 July 2026 (UTC)

With this deletion after you moving to mainspace over objection, it is clear that WP:CIR. Please do not move any additional drafts to mainspace without going through Articles for Creation. --CNMall41 (talk) 20:08, 16 July 2026 (UTC)

The Dragon (2027 film) article was moved from draft space to mainspace, post improvement of sources/references. You may have a look here. Wikipicked (talk) 05:03, 17 July 2026 (UTC)

If you believe there is an account policy issue, please use the proper venue. Wikipicked (talk) 05:01, 17 July 2026 (UTC)

Your thread has been archived

Hello Wikipicked! The thread you created at the Teahouse, Regarding Draft:Srinivasa Mangapuram, has been archived because there was no discussion for a few days. You can still read the archived discussion. If you have follow-up questions, please . See also the help page about the archival process. The archival was done by lowercase sigmabot III, and this notification was delivered by KiranBOT, both automated accounts. You can opt out of future notifications by placing {{bots|deny=KiranBOT}} on top of the current page (your user talk page). —KiranBOT (talk) 03:04, 21 July 2026 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Fly91 (July 22)

Draft declined

Thank you for contributing to Wikipedia. Your draft submission to Articles for creation has been reviewed but not accepted at this time.

Feedback

The reviewer, Nomadwikiholic1, left the following feedback:

This draft's references do not show that the subject meets Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion for organizations and companies. The draft requires multiple published secondary sources that:

• provide significant coverage: discuss the subject in detail, excluding routine coverage like product launches, staff appointments, or financial reports and listings in databases or listicles;
• are reliable: from reputable outlets with editorial oversight;
• are independent: not connected to the subject, such as press releases, the subject's own website, or sponsored content.

Please add references that meet all three of these criteria. If none exist, the subject is not yet suitable for Wikipedia.

Most of these references are announcement.

Next steps

• Edit Draft:Fly91 to address the points above, making sure to publish any changes.
• When you are ready to resubmit your draft for review, click the Resubmit button.
• If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it may be deleted.

Need help?

• For an overview of our policies and guidelines see Everything you need to know.
• You can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, or on the reviewer's talk page.

Scam warning

• If anyone asks you for money or payment to publish, protect, or restore a Wikipedia article or draft, it is a scam. Learn about scams on Wikipedia.

Nomadwikiholic1 (talk) 12:07, 22 July 2026 (UTC)

Hello, Wikipicked! Having a draft declined at Articles for creation can be disappointing, but don't be discouraged, it's common when creating your first article. Need help? For an overview of our policies and guidelines see Everything you need to know. To understand why your draft was declined, please read the reviewer's feedback and follow any links to help pages you've been given. If you're still confused, try asking for advice at the Articles for creation Help desk. For peer support regarding all other editing, sourcing, or policies, visit the Teahouse, a friendly question and answer hub for new editors. We'd love to see you there! Nomadwikiholic1 (talk) 12:07, 22 July 2026 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Uday Ruddarraju (July 22)

Draft declined

Thank you for contributing to Wikipedia. Your draft submission to Articles for creation has been reviewed but not accepted at this time.

Feedback

The reviewer, Sulfurboy, left the following feedback:

This draft's references do not show that the person meets Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion for people. The draft requires multiple published secondary sources that:

• provide significant coverage: discuss the person in detail, not brief mentions or interviews lacking independent analysis;
• are reliable: from reputable outlets with editorial oversight;
• are independent: not connected to the person, such as interviews, press releases, the subject's own website, or sponsored content.

Please add references that meet all three of these criteria. If none exist, the subject is not yet suitable for Wikipedia.

The sources aren't compelling. They are comprised of unreliable sites, press release regurgitation, or sources that lack any level of editorial oversight and have clear neutrality issues.

Next steps

• Edit Draft:Uday Ruddarraju to address the points above, making sure to publish any changes.
• When you are ready to resubmit your draft for review, click the Resubmit button.
• If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it may be deleted.

Need help?

• For an overview of our policies and guidelines see Everything you need to know.
• You can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, or on the reviewer's talk page.

Scam warning

• If anyone asks you for money or payment to publish, protect, or restore a Wikipedia article or draft, it is a scam. Learn about scams on Wikipedia.

Sulfurboy (talk) 21:52, 22 July 2026 (UTC)

2026 Delhi Jantar Mantar protests

Greetings!

I have noticed that you accidentally removed content in the infobox where the [[File:AISA flag.svg|25x25px]] [[All India Students' Association]] appeared. This okay because accidentals and mistakes happen, trust me, I've done worse.

I just want to let you know that you can add it back. The only reason why I'm not adding it myself is because it would be an ECP violation.

Thanks, and happy editing! ~2026-41116-97 (talk) 18:55, 23 July 2026 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Srinivasa Mangapuram (July 24)

Draft declined

Thank you for contributing to Wikipedia. Your draft submission to Articles for creation has been reviewed but not accepted at this time.

Feedback

The reviewer, Nomadwikiholic1, left the following feedback:

This draft's references do not show that the film meets Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion for films. The draft requires either:

• evidence that the subject meets any of the specific criteria for films;

or multiple published secondary sources that:

• provide significant coverage: discuss the film in detail, not just brief mentions or routine announcements;
• are reliable: from reputable outlets with editorial oversight;
• are independent: not connected to the film, such as press releases, the studio's own website, or sponsored content.

Please add references that meet these criteria. If none exist, the subject is not yet suitable for Wikipedia.

Some rerences are interview and some are non by-lined , fails WP:V

Next steps

• Edit Draft:Srinivasa Mangapuram to address the points above, making sure to publish any changes.
• When you are ready to resubmit your draft for review, click the Resubmit button.
• If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it may be deleted.

Need help?

• For an overview of our policies and guidelines see Everything you need to know.
• You can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, or on the reviewer's talk page.

Scam warning

• If anyone asks you for money or payment to publish, protect, or restore a Wikipedia article or draft, it is a scam. Learn about scams on Wikipedia.

Nomadwikiholic1 (talk) 19:19, 24 July 2026 (UTC)

Speedy deletion declined: Gossip (2026 Film)

Hello Wikipicked, and thanks for patrolling new pages! I am just letting you know that I declined the speedy deletion of Gossip (2026 Film), a page you tagged for speedy deletion, because of the following concern: Is a plausible, useful redirect or is not a redirect at all. You may wish to review the Criteria for Speedy Deletion before tagging further pages. Thank you. CoconutOctopus talk 09:56, 26 July 2026 (UTC)

I have sent you a note about a page you started

Hi Wikipicked. Thank you for your work on Chennai Love Story. Another editor, Nomadwikiholic1, has reviewed it as part of new pages patrol and left the following comment:

There are reviews on Google, add them by creating a reception section.

To reply, leave a comment here and begin it with {{Re|Nomadwikiholic1}}. (Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

Nomadwikiholic1 (talk) 17:15, 6 August 2026 (UTC)