Welcome!

edit
 
Welcome!

Hello, Wintervoid2314, and welcome to Wikipedia! I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Below are some pages you might find helpful. For a user-friendly interactive help forum, see the Wikipedia Teahouse.

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you need help, please see our help pages, and if you can't find what you are looking for there, please feel free to ask me on my talk page or place {{Help me}} on this page and someone will drop by to help. Again, welcome! Waonderer (talk) 22:54, 29 July 2024 (UTC)Reply

August 2024

edit

  Hello, I'm Waxworker. I noticed that you added or changed content in an article, Breakcore, but you didn't provide a reliable source. It's been removed and archived in the page history for now, but if you'd like to include a citation and re-add it, please do so. You can have a look at referencing for beginners. If you think I made a mistake, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. Waxworker (talk) 08:01, 8 August 2024 (UTC)Reply

  Hello, I'm DB1729. I wanted to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions to Dyslexia have been undone because they did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use your sandbox. If you have any questions, you can ask for assistance at the Teahouse or the Help desk. Thanks. DB1729talk 02:48, 9 August 2024 (UTC)Reply

  Please do not add or change content, as you did at Boulder Valley School District, without citing a reliable source. Please review the guidelines at Wikipedia:Citing sources and take this opportunity to add references to the article. Thank you. Meters (talk) 00:47, 24 August 2024 (UTC)Reply

  Please stop. If you continue to add unsourced or poorly sourced content, as you did at Ksar El Hirane District, you may be blocked from editing. And please read WP:MOS Meters (talk) 00:51, 24 August 2024 (UTC)Reply

I apologize. Wintervoid2314 (talk) 04:15, 24 August 2024 (UTC)Reply
 
You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for Vandalism, as you did at here. I appreciate that you have apologised for adding unsourced material, but vandalism is a rather more serious matter, and it puts greater suspicion on any unsourced content you have added. NB to any admin considering an unblock request, no need to consult me, but I'd suggest a condition of citing all edits as well as addressing the vandalism issue.
If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please review Wikipedia's guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text to the bottom of your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}.  ϢereSpielChequers 17:55, 24 August 2024 (UTC)Reply
 
This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Wintervoid2314 (block logactive blocksglobal blockscontribsdeleted contribsfilter logcreation logchange block settingsunblockcheckuser (log))


Request reason:

Hello. I apologize for the vandalism as well as uncited edits I have made I don't have very much defense on them besides I wasnt thinking clearly at the time when I did them. I understand why I have been blocked from making edits. I would greatly appreciate it If I am given a second chance to edit wikipedia again as I really enjoy editing in good faith. I understand if this request is denied. Thank you for reviewing this unblock requestWintervoid2314 (talk) 05:02, 25 August 2024 (UTC)Reply

Decline reason:

It appears that you will need to remain blocked to protect Wikipedia from your lapses in thinking. To be unblocked, the blocking administrator is only asking for a commitment to source your edits, and for you to address your vandalism- tell us why we should trust you won't vandalize again. 331dot (talk) 08:02, 25 August 2024 (UTC)Reply


If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

 
This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Wintervoid2314 (block logactive blocksglobal blockscontribsdeleted contribsfilter logcreation logchange block settingsunblockcheckuser (log))


Request reason:

Thank you for reviewing my unblock request. With the unsourced edits, I will probably only focus on copy-editing because finding citations is too advanced for me so far but if I do add information, I will source the information. I will also remove all of the unsourced edits that I have made. In terms of why you should trust me, I honestly don't really have a good reason. If I do relapse like I did earlier, I will do it to the sandbox page instead of public article because I understand how problematic vandalism is for this site. I would greatly appreciate a second chance at editing on wikipedia again. Thank you again for reviewing this.Wintervoid2314 (talk) 19:01, 25 August 2024 (UTC)Reply

Decline reason:

Frankly, nothing here convinces me you'd be a substantial benefit to Wikipedia, not enough to justify unblocking you given the problems you demonstrated that lead to your block. Yamla (talk) 09:26, 26 August 2024 (UTC)Reply


If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.