WorldWidePressNo1

Your submission at Articles for creation: Abrafaxi - Pod črno zastavo (July 6)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Dan arndt was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Abrafaxi - Pod črno zastavo and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Abrafaxi - Pod črno zastavo, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{db-self}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
• If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk or on the reviewer's talk page.
• You can also use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Dan arndt (talk) 08:46, 6 July 2018 (UTC)

Hello, WorldWidePressNo1! Having an article declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! Dan arndt (talk) 08:46, 6 July 2018 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Draft:Abrafaxi - Pod črno zastavo

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.

You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Draft:Abrafaxi - Pod črno zastavo requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G12 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page appears to be an unambiguous copyright infringement. This page appears to be a direct copy from http://www.slocartoon.net/?main=cartoons/cartoon&cartoon_id=4388. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images taken from other web sites or printed material, and as a consequence, your addition will most likely be deleted. You may use external websites or other printed material as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences. This part is crucial: say it in your own words. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

If the external website or image belongs to you, and you want to allow Wikipedia to use the text or image — which means allowing other people to use it for any reason — then you must verify that externally by one of the processes explained at Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials. The same holds if you are not the owner but have their permission. If you are not the owner and do not have permission, see Wikipedia:Requesting copyright permission for how you may obtain it. You might want to look at Wikipedia's copyright policy for more details, or ask a question here.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. S Philbrick(Talk) 10:26, 6 July 2018 (UTC)

October 2019

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at Talk:Shawn Mendes. Billiekhalidfan (talk) 18:48, 19 October 2019 (UTC)

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing because it appears that you are not here to build an encyclopedia.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}.  ST47 (talk) 19:02, 19 October 2019 (UTC)

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

WorldWidePressNo1 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

---

Request reason:

You banned for nothing you peace of birocratic shit you clearly have no idea that i created this account and i clearly am here to contribute to Wikipedia because I proved that by actually making a wiki page on slovenian wikipedia about a famous woman from Slovenia and it wasn't there before and because you guys(The Wikipedia) beg me to create it so you can fill in the gaps that you have on other pages where this particular famous woman was mentioned and by "beg" i mean that you guys created kinda a suggestion page where there are themes and besides them there are numbers of how many time that theme/thing go referenced and used on other wiki pages so don't live to me about who i am and why i am here because you clearly have no idea ST47 oh and here is this i was not the one who should get banned, you should ban those mods/editors of the Camila Cabello and Shawn Mendes wiki pages because they are morons and stupid they still think Shawn and Camila are not dating for real and they are a PR stunt when they said numerous of times and i can prove it if its necessary that they are not a PR like in interviews,videos,articles,etc... but if you wouldn't be blind i wouldn't get banned from editing if there is someone who is vandalizing it is you , you vandalized my account by banning me from editing without even giving me a noticed(got no nofflication) also fix your god deam spell-checker because it is horrendeous it shows that i misspelled something when i clearly haven't so please replace if you would replace this shitty spell-checker of yours with a google one because that one is atleast much better and seeing right and wrong than yours here. WorldWidePressNo1 (talk) 11:08, 29 March 2020 (UTC)

Decline reason:

Talk page access revoked. Yamla (talk) 11:15, 29 March 2020 (UTC)

---

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Your ability to edit this talk page has been revoked as an administrator has identified your talk page edits as inappropriate and/or disruptive.

(block log • active blocks • global blocks • autoblocks • contribs • deleted contribs • abuse filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

---

If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you should read the guide to appealing blocks, then contact administrators by submitting a request to the Unblock Ticket Request System. If the block is a CheckUser or Oversight block, was made by the Arbitration Committee or to enforce an arbitration decision (arbitration enforcement), or is unsuitable for public discussion, you should appeal to the Arbitration Committee.
Please note that there could be appeals to the unblock ticket request system that have been declined leading to the post of this notice.