Hello, I hope I can help; Please sign & date comments by appending four tildes to the edit (~~~~). I had an archive here, but nobody wants to see discussions from 2004; very old debates removed.


Articles you might like to edit, from SuggestBot

edit

SuggestBot predicts that you will enjoy editing some of these articles. Have fun!

Stubs
List of scientists opposing the mainstream scientific assessment of global warming
False positive paradox
CASPIAN
Mercury Communications
Teen Vogue
Daylesford, Gloucestershire
Index of climate change articles
Abdullah S. Jum'ah
Seacoast Media Group
BarWatch
Brian David-Marshall
List of magicians
Chuschi
Jordan Telecom Group
Indexation
Cuban–American Treaty
David Bates (historian)
Acacia Demonstration Gardens
Lotus Marketplace
Cleanup
Internet in Bulgaria
Long Range Surveillance
Economics of global warming
Merge
Lap steel guitar
Landline
Water security
Add Sources
Cancer
Gavin Young
Forest steppe
Wikify
Florence Nightingale David
Home Economics
Ng Mui
Expand
Simmons & Company International
Sibirtelecom
Unconventional oil

SuggestBot picks articles in a number of ways based on other articles you've edited, including straight text similarity, following wikilinks, and matching your editing patterns against those of other Wikipedians. It tries to recommend only articles that other Wikipedians have marked as needing work. Your contributions make Wikipedia better -- thanks for helping.

If you have feedback on how to make SuggestBot better, please tell me on SuggestBot's talk page. Thanks from Nettrom (talk), SuggestBot's caretaker.

P.S. You received these suggestions because your name was listed on the SuggestBot request page. If this was in error, sorry about the confusion. -- SuggestBot (talk) 10:36, 6 June 2010 (UTC)Reply

Undue weight problems on Cyrus Cylinder

edit

I'm unhappy with some of your recent edits on Cyrus Cylinder - please see Talk:Cyrus Cylinder#Undue weight problems. -- ChrisO (talk) 21:45, 26 June 2010 (UTC)Reply

Response: ChrisO has raised an interesting question about whether part of a source can be too recent to prominently include in an article. I partly agreed that it could (see Talk:Cyrus Cylinder#Undue weight problems) but mentioned complications with excluding it. --Wragge (talk) 03:23, 27 June 2010 (UTC)Reply

Articles you might like to edit, from SuggestBot

edit

SuggestBot predicts that you will enjoy editing some of these articles. Have fun!

Stubs
Abdullah S. Jum'ah
Simulium
Informal fallacy
John Kay (economist)
Artificial demand
Existential fallacy
Pampulha
IPCC First Assessment Report
Ryszard Białous
Bubaque
Fallacy of distribution
Daylesford, Gloucestershire
Zero-player game
Fallacies of Distributed Computing
Evolutionary game theory
Brian David-Marshall
Kaldor's facts
Stephen V. Harkness
William Venn Gough
Cleanup
Gross domestic product per barrel
Marcus Hutter
Austrian School
Merge
Perfect solution fallacy
Option contract
Converse accident
Add Sources
Timeline of extinctions
Nash equilibrium
Minimum wage
Wikify
Sheizaf Rafaeli
Florence Nightingale David
List of C functions
Expand
Deductive fallacy
Simmons & Company International
Unconventional oil

SuggestBot picks articles in a number of ways based on other articles you've edited, including straight text similarity, following wikilinks, and matching your editing patterns against those of other Wikipedians. It tries to recommend only articles that other Wikipedians have marked as needing work. Your contributions make Wikipedia better -- thanks for helping.

If you have feedback on how to make SuggestBot better, please tell me on SuggestBot's talk page. Thanks from Nettrom (talk), SuggestBot's caretaker.

P.S. You received these suggestions because your name was listed on the SuggestBot request page. If this was in error, sorry about the confusion. -- SuggestBot (talk) 06:53, 9 July 2010 (UTC)Reply

Articles you might like to edit, from SuggestBot

edit

SuggestBot predicts that you will enjoy editing some of these articles. Have fun!

Stubs
Abdullah S. Jum'ah
Brian David-Marshall
John Paul Wiggin
IPCC First Assessment Report
Margaret Maron
Richard Wilkinson (public health)
Fallacy of distribution
Evolutionary game theory
Proof by assertion
Fallacies of Distributed Computing
Sir Bagby
CLAW hypothesis
Informal fallacy
Syllogistic fallacy
Ice-albedo feedback
Existential fallacy
Third-cause fallacy
Hans Joachim Schellnhuber
John Kay (economist)
Cleanup
Effects of climate change on marine mammals
Wishful thinking
Confusion of the inverse
Merge
Nationalism
Abrupt climate change
United Nations Framework Convention on Climate Change
Add Sources
Pampulha
Greenhouse gas
Global warming controversy
Wikify
Butterfly Economics
Climate change in Nevada
Space Shuttle (pinball)
Expand
Deductive fallacy
Right-wing politics
Asian Steppe

SuggestBot picks articles in a number of ways based on other articles you've edited, including straight text similarity, following wikilinks, and matching your editing patterns against those of other Wikipedians. It tries to recommend only articles that other Wikipedians have marked as needing work. Your contributions make Wikipedia better -- thanks for helping.

If you have feedback on how to make SuggestBot better, please tell me on SuggestBot's talk page. Thanks from Nettrom (talk), SuggestBot's caretaker.

P.S. You received these suggestions because your name was listed on the SuggestBot request page. If this was in error, sorry about the confusion. -- SuggestBot (talk) 18:40, 10 September 2010 (UTC)Reply

Articles you might like to edit, from SuggestBot

edit

SuggestBot predicts that you will enjoy editing some of these articles. Have fun!

Stubs
IPCC First Assessment Report
Informal fallacy
Blue Raspberry flavor
Fallacy of distribution
Ice-albedo feedback
Syllogistic fallacy
Fallacies of Distributed Computing
Hans Joachim Schellnhuber
John Kay (economist)
Sir Bagby
2MASS J04414489+2301513
Pampulha
John Paul Wiggin
Existential fallacy
Third-cause fallacy
CLAW hypothesis
Abdullah S. Jum'ah
Fallacy of division
Richard Wilkinson (public health)
Cleanup
Law of thought
Conservatism in the United States
Nationalism
Merge
Abrupt climate change
Water security
Palestine Solidarity Campaign
Add Sources
Relativist fallacy
Affirming a disjunct
Greenhouse gas
Wikify
Florence Nightingale David
Butterfly Economics
Vernal keratoconjunctivitis
Expand
Right-wing politics
Simmons & Company International
Deductive fallacy

SuggestBot picks articles in a number of ways based on other articles you've edited, including straight text similarity, following wikilinks, and matching your editing patterns against those of other Wikipedians. It tries to recommend only articles that other Wikipedians have marked as needing work. Your contributions make Wikipedia better -- thanks for helping.

If you have feedback on how to make SuggestBot better, please tell me on SuggestBot's talk page. Thanks from Nettrom (talk), SuggestBot's caretaker.

P.S. You received these suggestions because your name was listed on the SuggestBot request page. If this was in error, sorry about the confusion. -- SuggestBot (talk) 00:16, 7 October 2010 (UTC)Reply

Articles you might like to edit, from SuggestBot

edit

SuggestBot predicts that you will enjoy editing some of these articles. Have fun!

Stubs
IPCC First Assessment Report
Production sharing agreement
Hans Joachim Schellnhuber
Fallacy of distribution
Brian David-Marshall
John Godfrey Saxe
Margaret Maron
CLAW hypothesis
Fallacies of Distributed Computing
Sir Bagby
Ice-albedo feedback
Informal fallacy
John Kay (economist)
William Venn Gough
2MASS J04414489+2301513
Pampulha
Simulium
Michael Hunter (composer)
John Paul Wiggin
Cleanup
Nationalism
Runaway climate change
Carbon emission trading
Merge
United Nations Framework Convention on Climate Change
Perfect solution fallacy
Converse accident
Add Sources
Shock (economics)
Gavin Young
Relativist fallacy
Wikify
Florence Nightingale David
Vernal keratoconjunctivitis
English Defence League
Expand
Deductive fallacy
Simmons & Company International
Hubbert Linearization

SuggestBot picks articles in a number of ways based on other articles you've edited, including straight text similarity, following wikilinks, and matching your editing patterns against those of other Wikipedians. It tries to recommend only articles that other Wikipedians have marked as needing work. Your contributions make Wikipedia better -- thanks for helping.

If you have feedback on how to make SuggestBot better, please tell me on SuggestBot's talk page. Thanks from Nettrom (talk), SuggestBot's caretaker.

P.S. You received these suggestions because your name was listed on the SuggestBot request page. If this was in error, sorry about the confusion. -- SuggestBot (talk) 20:11, 11 November 2010 (UTC)Reply

Articles you might like to edit, from SuggestBot

edit

SuggestBot predicts that you will enjoy editing some of these articles. Have fun!

Stubs
John Kay (economist)
Fallacies of Distributed Computing
Informal fallacy
IPCC First Assessment Report
William Venn Gough
Existential fallacy
Pampulha
John Paul Wiggin
CLAW hypothesis
Production sharing agreement
Simulium
Ice-albedo feedback
Brian David-Marshall
Daylesford, Gloucestershire
Evolutionary game theory
Fallacy of distribution
Tradable
Hans Joachim Schellnhuber
Sir Bagby
Cleanup
Masked man fallacy
Bayes factor
Nationalism
Merge
Scientific racism
United Nations Framework Convention on Climate Change
Risks to civilization, humans and planet Earth
Add Sources
Greenhouse gas
Relativist fallacy
Affirming a disjunct
Wikify
Butterfly Economics
Space Shuttle (pinball)
Florence Nightingale David
Expand
Deductive fallacy
Simmons & Company International
Asian Steppe

SuggestBot picks articles in a number of ways based on other articles you've edited, including straight text similarity, following wikilinks, and matching your editing patterns against those of other Wikipedians. It tries to recommend only articles that other Wikipedians have marked as needing work. Your contributions make Wikipedia better -- thanks for helping.

If you have feedback on how to make SuggestBot better, please tell me on SuggestBot's talk page. Thanks from Nettrom (talk), SuggestBot's caretaker.

P.S. You received these suggestions because your name was listed on the SuggestBot request page. If this was in error, sorry about the confusion. -- SuggestBot (talk) 00:04, 16 December 2010 (UTC)Reply

Notification: changes to "Mark my edits as minor by default" preference

edit

Hello there. This is an automated message to tell you about the gradual phasing out of the preference entitled "Mark all edits minor by default", which you currently have (or very recently had) enabled.

On 13 March 2011, this preference was hidden from the user preferences screen as part of efforts to prevent its accidental misuse (consensus discussion). This had the effect of locking users in to their existing preference, which, in your case, was true. To complete the process, your preference will automatically be changed to false in the next few days. This does not require any intervention on your part and you will still be able to manually mark your edits as being minor in the usual way.

For established users such as yourself there is a workaround available involving custom JavaScript. With the script in place, you can continue with this functionality indefinitely (its use is governed by WP:MINOR). If you have any problems, feel free to drop me a note.

Thank you for your understanding and happy editing :) Editing on behalf of User:Jarry1250, LivingBot (talk) 18:53, 15 March 2011 (UTC)Reply

Proposed deletion of Conquer Online

edit
 

The article Conquer Online has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

No signs of notabilty. Lack of reliable sources

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Sir Lothar (talk) 07:08, 4 October 2011 (UTC)Reply

This deletion is perfectly reasonable. In fact, I thought it had happened years ago. --Wragge (talk) 13:36, 4 October 2011 (UTC)Reply
edit

Hi. In your recent article edits, you've added some links pointing to disambiguation pages. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

Dark Days in Monkey City (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)
added links pointing to Vale and Fig Tree
Defeasance (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)
added a link pointing to Prepayment

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:10, 1 January 2012 (UTC)Reply

Humpty Dumpty

edit

You may have forgotten that you created Ipse-dixitism in April 2005. In one of the edit summaries here, you explain your changes as a shift away from a dictionary definition by usage to a definition by example. These words helped to me to look at the subject in a fresh way.

You may recall that a link to Humpty Dumpty was first added by you here. I re-added it here. As follow-up, I wonder if you might be willing to review Talk:Ipse dixit#Humpty Dumpty?

I wonder how your thinking may have changed since you wrote

If you are willing, I would hope to discuss your practical ideas off-line?

 
An image that is partially in focus, but mostly out of focus in varying degrees.

Perhaps my understanding of the goals/objectives of Ipse dixit can be helped by a little bit of fine focus adjustment? --Ansei (talk) 18:26, 8 February 2013 (UTC)Reply

Notification of automated file description generation

edit

Your upload of File:BirthsForOmega.JPG or contribution to its description is noted, and thanks (even if belatedly) for your contribution. In order to help make better use of the media, an attempt has been made by an automated process to identify and add certain information to the media's description page.

This notification is placed on your talk page because a bot has identified you either as the uploader of the file, or as a contributor to its metadata. It would be appreciated if you could carefully review the information the bot added. To opt out of these notifications, please follow the instructions here. Thanks! Message delivered by Theo's Little Bot (opt-out) 13:30, 6 February 2014 (UTC)Reply

edit

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Law of primacy in persuasion, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Law of primacy (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 08:56, 30 April 2014 (UTC)Reply

Good article reassessment

edit

Peak oil, an article that you or your project may be interested in, has been nominated for a community good article reassessment. If you are interested in the discussion, please participate by adding your comments to the reassessment page. If concerns are not addressed during the review period, the good article status may be removed from the article. Beagel (talk) 18:37, 5 June 2014 (UTC)Reply

Merge discussion

edit

Hello Wragge,

Where should we take the Distressed securities merge discussion next to get it resolved from an uninvolved admin? I would like an uninvolved third party to determine what steps need to be taken next. I asked user Jonathan A Jones and I also posted a comment to the ANI board for assistance a couple weeks ago but never received a response from either. Thanks in advance for the help! Best, Comatmebro ~Come at me~ 17:15, 22 October 2014 (UTC)Reply

I think that makes sense; I don't keep current on the policies. Perhaps an expert will know the best, or most compliant, way to arrange this information. Wragge (talk) 17:41, 22 October 2014 (UTC)Reply

Need help

edit

Hello Wragge,

I am trying to locate some literature and maybe you can help. In your edit [[1]] you inserted "Therefore, the early versions of the theorm could make no predictions about the affect on the unskilled labour force in a high income country under trade liberalization. However, more sophisticated models with multiple classes of worker productivity have been shown to produce the Stolper-Samuelson effect within each class of labour". If you can provide me references to "models with multiple classes of worker productivity" I would be much obliged.

Thanks,

JS (talk) 01:30, 14 October 2015 (UTC)Reply

ArbCom elections are now open!

edit

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 13:01, 23 November 2015 (UTC)Reply

ArbCom Elections 2016: Voting now open!

edit

Hello, Wragge. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)Reply

ArbCom 2017 election voter message

edit

Hello, Wragge. Voting in the 2017 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC)Reply

edit

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Potential future exposure, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Profit (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:01, 28 January 2019 (UTC)Reply

edit

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited The Campaign for North Africa, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Hardcore (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:12, 25 April 2019 (UTC)Reply

Proposed deletion of File:Wheel1510FortunaSapientia.jpg

edit
 

The file File:Wheel1510FortunaSapientia.jpg has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

unused, low-res, no obvious use

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated files}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the file's talk page.

Please consider addressing the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated files}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and files for discussion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion.

This bot DID NOT nominate any file(s) for deletion; please refer to the page history of each individual file for details. Thanks, FastilyBot (talk) 01:01, 19 October 2019 (UTC)Reply

ArbCom 2019 election voter message

edit
 Hello! Voting in the 2019 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 on Monday, 2 December 2019. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2019 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:04, 19 November 2019 (UTC)Reply

ArbCom 2021 Elections voter message

edit
 Hello! Voting in the 2021 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 6 December 2021. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2021 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:08, 23 November 2021 (UTC)Reply

edit

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Lila Lee, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Payoff.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:03, 24 November 2021 (UTC)Reply

ArbCom 2022 Elections voter message

edit

Hello! Voting in the 2022 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 12 December 2022. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2022 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:27, 29 November 2022 (UTC)Reply

ArbCom 2023 Elections voter message

edit

Hello! Voting in the 2023 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 11 December 2023. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2023 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:22, 28 November 2023 (UTC)Reply

ArbCom 2024 Elections voter message

edit

Hello! Voting in the 2024 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 2 December 2024. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2024 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:09, 19 November 2024 (UTC)Reply