Hello, Xzingemer, and Welcome to Wikipedia!

Thank you for your contributions to this free encyclopedia. If you decide that you need help, check out Getting Help below, ask at the help desk, or place {{Help me}} on your talk page and ask your question there. Please remember to sign your name on talk pages by clicking or by typing four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your username and the date. Also, please do your best to always fill in the edit summary field. Below are some useful links to help you get started. Happy editing! KylieTastic (talk) 18:27, 12 October 2024 (UTC)Reply

Your submission at Articles for creation: Akila Daily (October 12)

edit
 
Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by KylieTastic was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.
KylieTastic (talk) 18:27, 12 October 2024 (UTC)Reply
 
Hello, Xzingemer! Having an article draft declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! KylieTastic (talk) 18:27, 12 October 2024 (UTC)Reply

Your submission at Articles for creation: Akila Daily (October 12)

edit
 
Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Wikishovel was:  The comment the reviewer left was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.
Wikishovel (talk) 19:09, 12 October 2024 (UTC)Reply

Your submission at Articles for creation: Akila Daily (October 12)

edit
 
Your recent article submission has been rejected and cannot be resubmitted. If you have further questions, you can ask at the Articles for creation help desk or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help. The reason left by SafariScribe was: This topic is not sufficiently notable for inclusion in Wikipedia. The comment the reviewer left was: Please seek advice and I would reopen for resubmission.
Safari ScribeEdits! Talk! 20:43, 12 October 2024 (UTC)Reply

Speedy deletion declined: Amar Asom

edit

Hello, Xzingemer! I wanted to let you know I declined your speedy deletion nomination of Amar Asom because you did not provide a rationale for why you thought it should be speedily deleted. On Wikipedia, we have very specific criteria for which articles should be speedily deleted, such as containing copyright violations. Please review our policies before nominating a page for speedy deletion again. If a page does not meet the criteria for speedy deletion, but you think it does not meet Wikipedia's notability guidelines, you may nominate it for deletion via a Articles for Deletion. Let me know if you have any questions, comments, and/or concerns regarding this matter. Thank you! Significa liberdade (she/her) (talk) 22:23, 12 October 2024 (UTC)Reply

October 2024

edit
 

Hello Xzingemer. The nature of your edits, such as the one you made to Radar (news magazine), gives the impression you have an undisclosed financial stake in promoting a topic, but you have not complied with Wikipedia's mandatory paid editing disclosure requirements. Paid advocacy is a category of conflict of interest (COI) editing that involves being employed (or being compensated in any way) by a person, group, company or organization to promote their interests. Paid advocacy on Wikipedia must be disclosed even if you have not specifically been asked to edit Wikipedia. Undisclosed paid advocacy is prohibited by our policies on neutral point of view and what Wikipedia is not, and is an especially serious type of COI; the Wikimedia Foundation regards it as a "black hat" practice akin to black-hat search-engine optimization.

Paid advocates are strongly discouraged from direct article editing, and should instead propose changes on the talk page of the article in question if an article exists. If the article does not exist, paid advocates are strongly discouraged from attempting to write an article at all. At best, any proposed article creation should be submitted through the articles for creation process, rather than directly.

Regardless, if you are receiving or expect to receive compensation for your edits, broadly construed, you are required by the Wikimedia Terms of Use to disclose your employer, client and affiliation. You can post such a mandatory disclosure to your user page at User:Xzingemer. The template {{Paid}} can be used for this purpose – e.g. in the form: {{paid|user=Xzingemer|employer=InsertName|client=InsertName}}. If I am mistaken – you are not being directly or indirectly compensated for your edits – please state that in response to this message. Otherwise, please provide the required disclosure. In either case, do not edit further until you answer this message.

You tried an WP:AHIJACK of that article, a prima facie evidence of tendentious, promotional activity.Alalch E. 23:01, 15 October 2024 (UTC)Reply

sorry i was about to create a new article , i wasn't aware i edited already present wikipedia. i thought it was new creation !! thank u , i will try on sandbox first. Xzingemer (talk) 23:03, 15 October 2024 (UTC)Reply
The nature of your edits, in general (including the WP:AHIJACK of Radar (news magazine)—you created an article for a website that was launched today, as you wrote in the Hausa Wikipedia article: ha:Radar Chronicle), gives the impression you have an undisclosed financial stake in promoting a topic, but you have not complied with Wikipedia's mandatory paid editing disclosure requirements. On the Hausa Wikipedia you are publishing common spam such as ha:Punam Gupta (Entrepreneur). If you are receiving or expect to receive compensation for your edits, broadly construed, you are required by the Wikimedia Terms of Use to disclose your employer, client and affiliation. Do not edit further until you answer this message. —Alalch E. 23:14, 15 October 2024 (UTC)Reply