Welcome!

edit

Hello, Aniltheultimate, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Unfortunately, one or more of the pages you created, such as Mr. X, may not conform to some of Wikipedia's guidelines, and may not be retained.

There's a page about creating articles you may want to read called Your first article. If you are stuck, and looking for help, please come to the Teahouse, where experienced Wikipedians can answer any queries you have! Or, you can just type {{help me}} on this page, followed by your question, and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Here are a few other good links for newcomers:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you have any questions, check out Wikipedia:Questions or ask questions on Wikipedia:Teahouse

Read WP:CITEC E (talk) 11:16, 22 April 2015 (UTC)Reply

Teahouse talkback: you've got messages!

edit
 
Hello, Yaksha Prashna. Your question has been answered at the Teahouse Q&A board. Feel free to reply there!
Please note that all old questions are archived after 2-3 days of inactivity. Message added by David Biddulph (talk) 14:27, 22 April 2015 (UTC). (You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{teahouse talkback}} template).Reply

Please go through this WP:BLOGS , to know why i reverted your previous edit. Thanks--C E (talk) 14:31, 22 April 2015 (UTC)Reply

You can use this reference http://www.motherlandmagazine.com/ghost-issue/ramsay-international. You can thank Cyphoidbomb , for clearing the air --C E (talk) 15:11, 25 April 2015 (UTC)Reply

August 2016

edit

  Please do not add commentary or your own personal analysis to Wikipedia articles, as you did to Phobia (2016 film). Doing so violates Wikipedia's neutral point of view policy and breaches the formal tone expected in an encyclopedia. Diff: [1] Cyphoidbomb (talk) 06:49, 17 August 2016 (UTC)Reply

Speedy deletion nomination of Guddu Dhanoa

edit
 

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.

You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Guddu Dhanoa requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G12 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page appears to be an unambiguous copyright infringement. This page appears to be a direct copy from http://www.gomolo.com/guddu-dhanoa-biography/5120/550164. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material, and as a consequence, your addition will most likely be deleted. You may use external websites or other printed material as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences. This part is crucial: say it in your own words. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

If the external website or image belongs to you, and you want to allow Wikipedia to use the text or image — which means allowing other people to modify it — then you must verify that externally by one of the processes explained at Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials. If you are not the owner of the external website or image but have permission from that owner, see Wikipedia:Requesting copyright permission. You might want to look at Wikipedia's policies and guidelines for more details, or ask a question here.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Domdeparis (talk) 13:31, 15 February 2017 (UTC)Reply

Blocking

edit
 
This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Yaksha Prashna (block logactive blocksglobal blockscontribsdeleted contribsfilter logcreation logchange block settingsunblockcheckuser (log))


Request reason:

Why my user name is blocked Yaksha Prashna (talk) 10:48, 14 March 2020 (UTC)Reply

Decline reason:

It isn't. If you are unable to edit, please exactly follow the instructions which appear when you attempt to do so. Yamla (talk) 10:56, 14 March 2020 (UTC)Reply


If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Hi Yamla, I tried editing again, but getting this message:

Editing from 113.193.175.0/24 has been blocked (disabled) by IvanvectorYaksha Prashna (talk) 11:03, 14 March 2020 (UTC)Reply

@Ivanvector:, this is your block and it is a checkuser block. --Yamla (talk) 11:05, 14 March 2020 (UTC)Reply
Thanks Yamla. My apologies for my delayed response, I was out of town for a funeral over the weekend.
Yaksha Prashna, I apologize for the inconvenience. Another user with a connection near yours was blocked for disruptive editing, and I blocked the portion of your network which you both use. Your account was not blocked, I did not intend to block you and you have done nothing wrong. I have changed the block settings now so that you will not be prevented from editing because of the other user. If you have any questions please feel free to ask. Ivanvector (Talk/Edits) 12:58, 16 March 2020 (UTC)Reply

Thanks Ivanvector. I have also read your mail and I am highly obliged for your detail explanations about the thing. I request you to please advise us on the issue of using two accounts from the same WIFI. Please tell us what we should do? Thanks Again. Yaksha Prashna (talk) 10:22, 17 March 2020 (UTC)Reply

edit

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Guddu Dhanoa, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Ziddi (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 05:25, 1 June 2020 (UTC)Reply

Hi DPL bot Thanks for the advise. Extremely sorry for the mistake done. I check all the links in preview page before publishing, may be this one i just missed. Yaksha Prashna (talk) 06:58, 2 June 2020 (UTC)Reply