User talk:ZachScientia
Add topic| This is ZachScientia's talk page, where you can send them messages and comments. |
|
Your submission at Articles for creation: Hassan al-Amiri (May 24)
[edit]
- evidence that the subject meets any of the specific criteria for music;
or multiple published secondary sources that:
- provide significant coverage: discuss the subject in detail, not just brief mentions or routine announcements;
- are reliable: from reputable outlets with editorial oversight;
- are independent: not connected to the subject, such as interviews, press releases, the subject's own website, or sponsored content.
Please add references that meet these criteria. If none exist, the subject is not yet suitable for Wikipedia.
It is often easier to prove the notability of an album or artist than an individual song or band member. If the subject is not yet notable, consider improving a relevant existing article instead.Next steps
- Edit Draft:Hassan al-Amiri to address the points above, making sure to publish any changes.
- When you are ready to resubmit your draft for review, click the Resubmit button.
- If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it may be deleted.
Need help?
- For an overview of our policies and guidelines see Everything you need to know.
- You can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, or on the reviewer's talk page.
Scam warning
- If anyone asks you for money or payment to publish, protect, or restore a Wikipedia article or draft, it is a scam. Learn about scams on Wikipedia.
 |
Hello, ZachScientia!
Having an article draft declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! CoconutOctopus talk 19:51, 24 May 2026 (UTC) |
Your submission at Articles for creation
[edit]Next steps
- Edit the draft to address the points above, making sure to publish any changes.
- When you are ready to resubmit your draft for review, click the Resubmit button.
- If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it may be deleted.
Need help?
- For an overview of our policies and guidelines see Everything you need to know.
- You can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, or on the reviewer's talk page.
Scam warning
- If anyone asks you for money or payment to publish, protect, or restore a Wikipedia article or draft, it is a scam. Learn about scams on Wikipedia.
- Like I'm sorry just give me help on how much or even give me so link to the info I need for Wikipedia on a article for this case maybe from wikipedia. Thanks. ZachScientia (talk) 20:34, 24 May 2026 (UTC)
I'm very new to Wikipedia not in the absolute sense, but I've only made my account some days ago, so how much info do I need for basic allowance of this article. I want to make it.
Your submission at Articles for creation: The Concise Encyclopedia of Science & Technology (June 18)
[edit]- provide significant coverage: discuss the subject in detail, not just brief mentions or routine announcements;
- are reliable: from reputable outlets with editorial oversight;
- are independent: not connected to the subject, such as interviews, press releases, the subject's own website, or sponsored content.
Next steps
- Edit Draft:The Concise Encyclopedia of Science & Technology to address the points above, making sure to publish any changes.
- When you are ready to resubmit your draft for review, click the Resubmit button.
- If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it may be deleted.
Need help?
- For an overview of our policies and guidelines see Everything you need to know.
- You can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, or on the reviewer's talk page.
Scam warning
- If anyone asks you for money or payment to publish, protect, or restore a Wikipedia article or draft, it is a scam. Learn about scams on Wikipedia.
- Don't worry I'm just preparing it. ZachScientia (talk) 18:40, 18 June 2026 (UTC)
June 2026
[edit]
Hello, I'm TurquoiseGoose. I noticed that one or more of your recent contribution attempts to Draft:The Concise Encyclopedia of Science & Technology have been disallowed by an edit filter as they did not appear constructive. If you only meant to make test edits, please use your sandbox for that. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you may leave a message on my talk page. If you believe the edit filter disallowance was a false positive, please report it. Feel free to ask for assistance at the Teahouse whenever you like. - TurquoiseGoose•they/them•(talk) 20:03, 19 June 2026 (UTC)
Disambiguation link notification for August 2
[edit]Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited People's Party of Canada, a link pointing to the disambiguation page Religious right was added. Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, --DPL bot (talk) 05:57, 2 August 2026 (UTC)
- I'll add again, more specific this time. ZachScientia (talk) 03:38, 3 August 2026 (UTC)
August 2026
[edit] Hello, I'm Yue. I noticed that you added or changed content in an article, People's Party of Canada, but you didn't provide a reliable source. On Wikipedia, it's important that article content be verifiable. If you'd like to resubmit your change with a citation, your edit is archived in the page history. If you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. See also MOS:INFOBOXPURPOSE. Yue🌙 (talk) 08:25, 2 August 2026 (UTC)
- Well the other Ideologies didn't have references, so I thought it's fine, also the PPC is more conservative than the CPC, and that's a fact. I've done the research, they also had podcast with christian conservatives like charlie kirk. ZachScientia (talk) 03:37, 3 August 2026 (UTC)
- Made a mistake, not the party, but it's associates, still, it could count. ZachScientia (talk) 03:48, 3 August 2026 (UTC)
- All the ideologies listed in the infobox are sourced in the article body, in the section "Principles and policies". Please read MOS:INFOBOXPURPOSE and WP:OR. TL;DR, infoboxes reflect sourced information in the article body and also you are not a reliable source so your personal conclusions cannot be repeated as fact in Wikipedia's voice. Yue🌙 (talk) 07:26, 3 August 2026 (UTC)
- Made a mistake, not the party, but it's associates, still, it could count. ZachScientia (talk) 03:48, 3 August 2026 (UTC)
Hello. Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia. I noticed that your recent edit to Religious affiliations of presidents of the United States did not have an edit summary. Collaboration among editors is fundamental to Wikipedia, and every edit should be explained by a clear edit summary, or by discussion on the talk page. Please use the edit summary field to explain your reasoning for an edit or to describe what it changes. Summaries save time for other editors and reduce the chances that your edit will be misunderstood. For some edits, an adequate summary may be quite brief.
The edit summary field looks like this:
or in the visual editor:
Please provide an edit summary for every edit you make. If you are logged in to your account, you can give yourself a reminder by setting Preferences → Editing → Editor → 
Prompt me when entering a blank edit summary (or the default undo summary), and then click the "Save" button.
Thanks! Snowman304|talk 03:02, 18 August 2026 (UTC)
- Okay, I understand as someone interested in American history, and correcting people over it, Thank you. ZachScientia (talk) 03:05, 18 August 2026 (UTC)