Your submission at Articles for creation: Scholars' Cafe' (December 28)

edit
 
Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Theroadislong was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.
Theroadislong (talk) 09:14, 28 December 2017 (UTC)Reply


 
Hello! Zayyam123, I noticed your article was declined at Articles for Creation, and that can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! Theroadislong (talk) 09:14, 28 December 2017 (UTC)Reply

Your submission at Articles for creation: Zaid Ali (December 29)

edit
 
Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by David.moreno72 was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.
David.moreno72 12:15, 29 December 2017 (UTC)Reply

References - quality over quantity

edit

You will get good advice at Teahouse. All I want to add here is topics for articles must be notable, and to be notable, must be the subject of published content by independent sources. Not You Tube. Not a person's own website, blog or publications. Your own personal observations cannot be used, as those are considered original research (forbidden). Your time might be better used to improve existing articles rather than create new ones. I, myself, have contributed thousands of edits, including raising two articles to Good Article status, but have not yet tried to create an article. Good luck. David notMD (talk) 17:19, 30 December 2017 (UTC)Reply

Your edit at Muhammad in Islam

edit

Hello! I just reverted your edits to Muhammad in Islam, and wanted to let you know the reason. Per the Wikipedia Manual of Style, honorifics such as PBUH or its variants should not be used (unless, for example, they appear in a direct quote or book title). Happy editing! PohranicniStraze (talk) 18:13, 30 December 2017 (UTC)Reply

Thanks for your answer for reverting Muhammad In Islam. I will not do the mistake again. Zayyam123 (talk) 08:21, 31 December 2017 (UTC)Reply

Image without license

edit
 

Thanks for uploading File:Https---commons.wikimedia.org-wiki-File-30 Doradus, Tarantula Nebula.jpg. The image has been identified as not specifying the copyright status of the image, which is required by Wikipedia's policy on images. Even if you created the image yourself, you still need to release it so Wikipedia can use it. If you don't indicate the copyright status of the image on the image's description page, using an appropriate copyright tag, it may be deleted some time in the next seven days. If you made this image yourself, you can use copyright tags like {{PD-self}} (to release all rights), {{self|CC-by-sa-3.0|GFDL}} (to require that you be credited), or any tag here - just go to the image, click edit, and add one of those. If you have uploaded other images, please verify that you have provided copyright information for them as well.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

This is an automated notice by MifterBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. NOTE: once you correct this, please remove the tag from the image's page. --MifterBot (TalkContribsOwner) 05:46, 4 January 2018 (UTC)Reply

 

A tag has been placed on File:Https---commons.wikimedia.org-wiki-File-30 Doradus, Tarantula Nebula.jpg requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section F9 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the file appears to be a blatant copyright infringement. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images taken from other web sites or printed material, and as a consequence, your addition will most likely be deleted. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

If the image belongs to you, and you want to allow Wikipedia to use it — which means allowing other people to use it for any reason — then you must verify that externally by one of the processes explained at Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials. The same holds if you are not the owner but have their permission. If you are not the owner and do not have permission, see Wikipedia:Requesting copyright permission for how you may obtain it. You might want to look at Wikipedia's copyright policy for more details, or ask a question here.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Majora (talk) 04:32, 5 January 2018 (UTC)Reply

edit

  Hello Zayyam123, and welcome to Wikipedia. While we appreciate your contributions to Wikipedia, there are certain things you must keep in mind about using information from sources to avoid copyright and plagiarism issues here.

  • You can only copy/translate a small amount of a source, and you must mark what you take as a direct quotation with double quotation marks (") and cite the source using an inline citation. You can read about this at Wikipedia:Non-free content in the sections on "text". See also Help:Referencing for beginners, for how to cite sources here.
  • Aside from limited quotation, you must put all information in your own words and structure, in proper paraphrase. Following the source's words too closely can create copyright problems, so it is not permitted here; see Wikipedia:Close paraphrasing. (There is a college-level introduction to paraphrase, with examples, hosted by the Online Writing Lab of Purdue.) Even when using your own words, you are still, however, asked to cite your sources to verify the information and to demonstrate that the content is not original research.
  • Our primary policy on using copyrighted content is Wikipedia:Copyrights. You may also want to review Wikipedia:Copy-paste.
  • If you own the copyright to the source you want to copy or are a legally designated agent, you may be able to license that text so that we can publish it here. Understand, though, that unlike many other sites, where a person can license their content for use there and retain non-free ownership, that is not possible at Wikipedia. Rather, the release of content must be irrevocable, to the world, into the public domain (PD) or under a suitably-free and compatible copyright license. Such a release must be done in a verifiable manner, so that the authority of the person purporting to release the copyright is evidenced. See Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials.
  • In very rare cases (that is, for sources that are PD or compatibly licensed) it may be possible to include greater portions of a source text. However, please seek help at Wikipedia:Media copyright questions, the help desk or the Teahouse before adding such content to the article. 99.9% of sources may not be added in this way, so it is necessary to seek confirmation first. If you do confirm that a source is public domain or compatibly licensed, you will still need to provide full attribution; see Wikipedia:Plagiarism for the steps you need to follow.
  • Also note that Wikipedia articles may not be copied or translated without attribution. If you want to copy or translate from another Wikipedia project or article, you must follow the copyright attribution steps in Wikipedia:Translation#How to translate. See also Wikipedia:Copying within Wikipedia.

It's very important that contributors understand and follow these practices, as policy requires that people who persistently do not must be blocked from editing. If you have any questions about this, you are welcome to leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you.  samee  talk 06:33, 17 February 2018 (UTC)Reply

Your submission at Articles for creation: Zaid Ali (February 19)

edit
 
Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by 78.26 was:  The comment the reviewer left was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.
78.26 (spin me / revolutions) 20:42, 19 February 2018 (UTC)Reply

Invitation to WikiProject Pakistan

edit
Welcome!

Hi, and welcome to Wikipedia. I'm from WikiProject Pakistan. We're a group of editors working to improve Wikipedia's coverage of Pakistan.

There are a variety of interesting things to do within the project; you're free to participate however much — or little — you like:

If you have any questions, please don't hesitate to ask me or at the Wikiproject Pakistan noticeboard, and we'll be happy to help you. Again, welcome! We look forward to seeing you around!

Thanks

edit

Thanks for telling me about WikiProject Pakistan. I am now a member and will try to help the project to improve articles related to Pakistan. --Zayyam123 (talk) 07:50, 1 March 2018 (UTC)Reply

Your submission at Articles for creation: Zaid Ali (March 5)

edit
 
Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Heliosxeros was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.
EROS message 09:02, 5 March 2018 (UTC)Reply

March 2018

edit

  Please do not add original research or novel syntheses of published material to articles as you apparently did to Indo-Pakistani War of 1971. Please cite a reliable source for all of your contributions. Thank you. —MBL talk 07:17, 6 March 2018 (UTC)Reply

Note

edit
This message contains important information about an administrative situation on Wikipedia. It does not imply any misconduct regarding your own contributions to date.

Please carefully read this information:

The Arbitration Committee has authorised discretionary sanctions to be used for pages regarding India, Pakistan, and Afghanistan, a topic which you have edited. The Committee's decision is here.

Discretionary sanctions is a system of conduct regulation designed to minimize disruption to controversial topics. This means uninvolved administrators can impose sanctions for edits relating to the topic that do not adhere to the purpose of Wikipedia, our standards of behavior, or relevant policies. Administrators may impose sanctions such as editing restrictions, bans, or blocks. This message is to notify you that sanctions are authorised for the topic you are editing. Before continuing to edit this topic, please familiarise yourself with the discretionary sanctions system. Don't hesitate to contact me or another editor if you have any questions.

MBL talk 07:18, 6 March 2018 (UTC)Reply

Pashto

edit

Zayyam, I need to leave a message for someone on Wikimedia Commons who seems to only speak Pashto, and I'm not confident in the quality of Google Translate. Could you help? Thank you in advance. DS (talk) 03:52, 23 April 2018 (UTC)Reply

The message for commons:User talk:فضل الرحمن فيضون is: "For legal reasons, the photos you are submitting are not acceptable. Copyright is complicated, and pictures that you just find on websites are almost never okay. Even if they are of important people. We had to delete them. Sorry. Please don't upload more." Thank you, Zayyam. DS (talk) 17:51, 24 April 2018 (UTC)Reply

Your draft article, Draft:Zaid Ali

edit
 

Hello, Zayyam123. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Zaid Ali".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply edit the submission and remove the {{db-afc}}, {{db-draft}}, or {{db-g13}} code.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Sam Sailor 17:14, 7 September 2018 (UTC)Reply

Hey there, Zayyam!

edit

Hi there. I hope you're doing well. I just wanted to ask you if you have ever lived in Okara... if yes, please do shoot me a reply! Thanks. 39.40.116.244 (talk) 18:35, 3 May 2023 (UTC)Reply