Zygor

Notability of Vimage Media

A tag has been placed on Vimage Media requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done because the article, which appears to be about a real person, organization (band, club, company, etc.), or web content, does not indicate how or why the subject is notable: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, articles that do not indicate the subject's importance or significance may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable. If this is the first page that you have created, then you should read the guide to writing your first article.

If you think that you can assert the notability of the subject, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the article (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the article's talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the article meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would confirm the subject's notability under Wikipedia guidelines.

For guidelines on specific types of articles, you may want to check out our criteria for biographies, for web sites, for bands, or for companies. Feel free to leave a note on my talk page if you have any questions about this. decltype (talk) 12:26, 25 March 2009 (UTC)

In particular, you may want to read WP:CORP. If you have further questions, do not hesitate to ask. decltype (talk) 12:47, 25 March 2009 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Good Things Guy (August 21)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reasons left by DoubleGrazing were: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Good Things Guy and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
• If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

DoubleGrazing (talk) 14:11, 21 August 2024 (UTC)

Hello, Zygor! Having an article draft declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! DoubleGrazing (talk) 14:11, 21 August 2024 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Draft:Good Things Guy

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.

You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Draft:Good Things Guy, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G11 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page seems to be unambiguous advertising which only promotes a company, group, product, service, person, or point of view and would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become encyclopedic. Please read the guidelines on spam and Wikipedia:FAQ/Organizations for more information.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. DoubleGrazing (talk) 14:11, 21 August 2024 (UTC)

August 2024

Hello Zygor. The nature of your edits gives the impression you have an undisclosed financial stake in promoting a topic, but you have not complied with Wikipedia's mandatory paid editing disclosure requirements. Paid advocacy is a category of conflict of interest (COI) editing that involves being employed (or being compensated in any way) by a person, group, company or organization to promote their interests. Paid advocacy on Wikipedia must be disclosed even if you have not specifically been asked to edit Wikipedia. Undisclosed paid advocacy is prohibited by our policies on neutral point of view and what Wikipedia is not, and is an especially serious type of COI; the Wikimedia Foundation regards it as a "black hat" practice akin to black-hat search-engine optimization.

Paid advocates are strongly discouraged from direct article editing, and should instead propose changes on the talk page of the article in question if an article exists. If the article does not exist, paid advocates are strongly discouraged from attempting to write an article at all. At best, any proposed article creation should be submitted through the articles for creation process, rather than directly.

Regardless, if you are receiving or expect to receive compensation for your edits, broadly construed, you are required by the Wikimedia Terms of Use to disclose your employer, client and affiliation. You can post such a mandatory disclosure to your user page at User:Zygor. The template {{Paid}} can be used for this purpose – e.g. in the form: {{paid|user=Zygor|employer=InsertName|client=InsertName}}. If I am mistaken – you are not being directly or indirectly compensated for your edits – please state that in response to this message. Otherwise, please provide the required disclosure. In either case, do not edit further until you answer this message. Seraphimblade ^{Talk to me} 14:28, 21 August 2024 (UTC)

I am doing it for them as they are an NGO but no compensation as they had no time to put up the article. I don’t work for the organization either. Thank you for the feedback and appreciate your speedy reply. 102.182.46.57 (talk) 14:32, 21 August 2024 (UTC)

Hi. Can you please restore the draft? You completely deleted it? I have to redo the enture article? How can I redo this again? That took a long time. I also answered the question about compensation?? Please help. Zygor (talk) 15:45, 21 August 2024 (UTC)

It's obviously up to Seraphimblade whether he chooses to restore the draft or not, but just to say that it was deleted because it was entirely promotional, and promotion of any sort is not allowed on Wikipedia. So whether you get your draft back or write a new one, you should not resubmit a draft like that. Wikipedia articles are written by summarising, in a neutral and factual manner, what independent and reliable third parties have said about a subject and what makes it worthy of note. This was written very much from the perspective of the subject itself.

As for your earlier reply (well, I'm assuming it was you, although you weren't logged into your account?) when you say you're "doing it for them as they are an NGO", this implies you have some sort of a real-life relationship with this subject, which would constitute a conflict of interest even if no money or other rewards change hands. I will post a separate message here regarding managing your COI situation; please read and respond to it. Thank you. -- DoubleGrazing (talk) 15:58, 21 August 2024 (UTC)

To avoid COI, I volunteered to help write the article. I mean how else are people writing articles about companies? No one is writing articles, even if it's neutral or 3rd party with Wikipedia without some form of connection or relationship. There will ALWAYS be connected interests whether you're aware or not, and I'm being honest about it. So the COI rule is unfortunately too broad and not fully fair. I understand if applies to information being defamatory, disinformation or false (without links and citations). [Yes it was me earlier as Wikipedia doesn't login correctly via mobile]. So how else can I rewrite the article now? It's gone, it's not even in the drafts for me to redo to ensure compliance.

To ADD: The information provided was from news sources that spoke of "The Good Things Guy" as published by them.

The article in references connects to a prominent public figure as well as plenty of articles linking "Good Things Guy" already when I did a search on Wikipedia, e.g. Nightbirde - References The Good Things Guy [no. 56].

Your guidance is appreciated. Zygor (talk) 16:20, 21 August 2024 (UTC)

I'm confused, on one hand you suggest (if I understood you correctly) that everyone who writes an article has a COI of some sort; on the other, you seem to think you don't have one with regard to this subject?

COI is not a question of money or other benefit, or apply to "defamatory, disinformation or false" content. If you have a real-life relationship of any kind with the subject, you have a COI. If you've met with this person and spoken to them, if you know someone who is associated with them, if you've corresponded with them (as implied by you uploading those images, stating that they were "supplied by Brent Lindeque"), then you have a COI.

Obviously whether you have such a relationship, and what its precise nature may be, is only known to you, and therefore only you can decide whether you need to make a COI disclosure. My advice, FWIW, would be to err on the side of caution, and disclose a borderline COI, rather than not. -- DoubleGrazing (talk) 16:40, 21 August 2024 (UTC)

Oh let me clarify... I'm saying most articles will have a COI, INCLUDING me (especially company or organizationally related) as the ones that are on Wikipedia currently published have no statement of disclosure but I bet there is based on your statement "If you have a real-life relationship of any kind with the subject, you have a COI". There is no way to verify that. Companies have PAID TEAMS of experts to circumvent COI, especially 3rd party information that gets routinely pruned to avoid bad PR. I'm simply saying I'm being honest that I volunteered to help write up the articles as there are current references on Wikipedia on it. And yes I will disclose that I know the organization or person next time with the "Connected contributor template". Zygor (talk) 16:55, 21 August 2024 (UTC)

Managing a conflict of interest

Hello, Zygor. We welcome your contributions, but if you have an external relationship with the people, places or things you have written about on Wikipedia, you may have a conflict of interest (COI). Editors with a conflict of interest may be unduly influenced by their connection to the topic. See the conflict of interest guideline and FAQ for article subjects for more information. We ask that you:

• avoid editing or creating articles about yourself, your family, friends, colleagues, company, organization, clients, or competitors;
• propose changes on the talk pages of affected articles (you can use the {{edit COI}} template)—don't forget to give details of reliable sources supporting your suggestions;
• disclose your conflict of interest when discussing affected articles (see Wikipedia:Conflict of interest § How to disclose a COI);
• avoid linking to your organization's website in other articles (see Wikipedia:Spam § External link spamming);
• do your best to comply with Wikipedia's content policies.

In addition, you are required by the Wikimedia Foundation's terms of use to disclose your employer, client, and affiliation with respect to any contribution which forms all or part of work for which you receive, or expect to receive, compensation. See Wikipedia:Paid-contribution disclosure.

Also, editing for the purpose of advertising, publicizing, or promoting anyone or anything is not permitted. Thank you. DoubleGrazing (talk) 15:58, 21 August 2024 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Brent Lindeque (September 27)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Qcne was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Brent Lindeque and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
• If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Qcne (talk) 09:18, 27 September 2024 (UTC)