Wikipedia:Featured list candidates/96th Academy Awards/archive2

The following is an archived discussion of a featured list nomination. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the article's talk page or in Wikipedia talk:Featured list candidates. No further edits should be made to this page.

The list was promoted by Hey man im josh via FACBot (talk) 00:25, 31 August 2024 (UTC) [1].[reply]

96th Academy Awards

Nominator(s): Birdienest81talk 08:56, 29 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I am nominating the 2024 Oscars for featured list because we believe it has great potential to become a Featured List. I followed how the 1929, 1979, 1980, 1981, 1982, 1984, 1986, 1987, 1988, 1989, 1990, 1991, 1992, 1993, 1994, 1995, 1996, 1997, 1998, 1999, 2000, 2001, 2002, 2003, 2004, 2005, 2006, 2007, 2008, 2009, 2010, 2011, 2012, 2013, 2014, 2015, 2016, 2017, 2018, 2019, 2020, 2021, 2022, and 2023 ceremonies were written. Please note that this list has been greatly rewritten since the first unsuccessful nomination to format it similar to the other Oscar ceremony pages that were promoted to featured list status. Birdienest81talk 08:56, 29 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Comments

"Raj and Hamish have been incredible Oscars collaborators" - Hamish hasn't been mentioned in the body so clarify here who he is
"Comedian and journalist Amelia Dimoldenberg served as a social media and red carpet correspondent where she interviewed nominees at events including the Oscars nominees lunch and hosted" - "where" doesn't really work after the bit before so I suggest "Comedian and journalist Amelia Dimoldenberg served as a social media and red carpet correspondent, interviewing nominees at events including the Oscars nominees lunch and hosting"
"In September 2020, the Academy announced that starting with the 96th awards, all films" => "In September 2020, the Academy announced that, starting with the 96th awards, all films"
"which involves creative heads in an films production" => "which involves creative heads in a film's production"
"In addition, Academy FAQs stated that British films that have complied with the British Film Institute's inclusion and diversity standards will also be deemed" => "In addition, Academy FAQs stated that British films that have complied with the British Film Institute's inclusion and diversity standards would also be deemed"
"Furthermore with its win for Best Picture, Oppenheimer became" => "Furthermore, with its win for Best Picture, Oppenheimer became"
That's what I got :-) -- ChrisTheDude (talk) 07:24, 30 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

@ChrisTheDude: Done -- I have read your comments and have made the suggested changes as noted in your feedback.

--Birdienest81talk 08:15, 30 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Support -- ChrisTheDude (talk) 08:30, 30 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hey man im josh

Source review: Passed

Reliable enough for the information being cited
Consistent date formatting
Consistent and proper reference formatting
Appropriate wikilinks where applicable
Spot checks on sources match what they are being cited for

Feedback:

Ref 3 – Needs a date
Ref 31 – Add Associated Press as the agency

That's all I've got, good stuff. Ping me when the above has been addressed. Hey man im josh (talk) 17:45, 7 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

@Hey man im josh: Done -- I've made the corrections based on your comments.

--Birdienest81talk 08:34, 8 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Support. I really struggled to critique anything, this is very well sourced. Hey man im josh (talk) 18:09, 8 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Sgubaldo

Does Ref. 23 have a url or something that can be linked?

Unfortunately, there is no URL or webpage that links to the description/rationale as to why said person is receiving the award. The description is currently based on the Oscars official ceremony program pamphlet of which copies were once sold at the Academy Museum Store's website (see here) but have been since sold out.

Add an archive link for Ref. 22?

Done: Added archive link

Italicise "In Memoriam" (to this ==> In Memoriam) in the section heading and the first sentence ("The "In Memoriam" tribute, which featured....")? I'm not familiar with these lists, but that's how I've seen it displayed in the other FLs you've listed.

Hmmm, I'm not very sure about this. According to Joeyconnick, non-English language words in this context should have quotation marks rather than be italicized. I don't remember the exact policy based on the Manual of Style, but he does.
"In memoriam" is Anglicized (as in, it's not considered a foreign phrase as it appears in English-language dictionaries as a loanword or I guess loanphrase in this case) per MOS:FOREIGNITALIC. So it's not italicized as a foreign phrase. As a minor work (i.e. part of/a segment of a TV show/special/program), it is rendered in quotations per MOS:MINORWORK. Hope that helps. —Joeyconnick (talk) 03:44, 16 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Could Ref. 25 be moved into Ref. 24?

Done

In response, Kapoor and Mullan released a statement saying, "As a Canadian boy of South Asian descent and a girl from London who grew up watching the Oscars, dreaming of being part of it, this is a 'pinch me' moment!” said Kapoor and Mullan. “This has been an exceptional year for the movies, and it's an absolute privilege to be leading the team celebrating the global film industry and the astounding talents that bring these cinematic stories to life. We're dedicated to making it a remarkable celebration for all." ==> You might need to remove 'said Kapoor and Mullan'.

Done: Removed phrase since it is implied Kapoor and Mullan said the quote at the beginning, and therefore, it is redundant to mention them again.

Sgubaldo (talk) 17:25, 11 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

@Sgubaldo: I've read your comments and have made to respective corrections to them or have responded to them.

--Birdienest81talk 20:59, 15 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I'll wait for Joeyconnick's response on the quotation marks vs italics issue, and then I can support. Sgubaldo (talk) 21:06, 15 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Support, but perhaps go back through the various ceremony pages and retroactively fix the quotations/italics issue. Sgubaldo (talk) 10:51, 16 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Closing note: This candidate has been promoted, but there may be a delay in bot processing of the close. Please see WP:FLC/ar, and leave the {{featured list candidates}} template in place on the talk page until the bot goes through. Hey man im josh (talk) 16:41, 30 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive. Please do not modify it. No further edits should be made to this page.