Wikipedia:Featured picture candidates/Dominostein
Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes. Voting period ends on 5 Mar 2014 at 00:28:42 (UTC)
- Reason
- High resolution and quality, good shot of the snack. Makes me hungry.
- Articles in which this image appears
- Dominostein +1
- FP category for this image
- Wikipedia:Featured pictures/Food and drink
- Creator
- Alchemist-hp
- Support as nominator -- — Crisco 1492 (talk) 00:28, 23 February 2014 (UTC)
- Support Yummy! I love food!--Theparties (talk) 10:00, 23 February 2014 (UTC)
- Support Gotta run to the supermarket... --Ebertakis (talk) 14:10, 23 February 2014 (UTC)
- Support 'Licking the screen' --///EuroCarGT 03:30, 24 February 2014 (UTC)
- Support per everyone above.--Godot13 (talk) 04:52, 24 February 2014 (UTC)
- Support I can't resist. Jee 12:26, 24 February 2014 (UTC)
- Support nice picture, makes you want some. It's too bad I don't think I've ever seen them here in the US. I have a small question, can this picture be licensed under NC-ND on commons? (in addition to GFDL-1.2) --CyberXRef☎ 06:37, 26 February 2014 (UTC)
- Short answer: yes, under current policy. Long answer: It's hotly debated. See this. — Crisco 1492 (talk) 07:05, 26 February 2014 (UTC)
- Thank you, that was very informative. --CyberXRef☎ 05:50, 27 February 2014 (UTC)
- Oppose. Not freely licensed. I just ordered a box of them so I can shoot a better photo and release it under a legitimately free license. If you guys will give me a week, I'll offer an alternative (assuming they survive shipping). Kaldari (talk) 08:18, 28 February 2014 (UTC)
- I dread to rehash that lengthy discussion on Commons, but I note in protest (although I understand your position) that the English Wikipedia does not have any policies banning images with this license from FAC. — Crisco 1492 (talk) 08:34, 28 February 2014 (UTC)
- That is true, but in my view it is a loophole. The use of such licensing has long been deprecated on the en and de wikis. I'm surprised it's still allowed on Commons. Regardless, since I can't practically use this image anywhere besides Wikipedia without violating the licensing terms, I can't in good faith consider it one of our best works. I know this is a contentious opinion, and not strictly covered by the FPC criteria, but in this case I would prefer to ignore all rules :) If that means my opinion is disregarded, so be it. Kaldari (talk) 18:33, 28 February 2014 (UTC)
- I really support that opinion; this is really an unbelievable loophole. (However, since I already voted, I am not going to change it) --CyberXRef☎ 03:18, 1 March 2014 (UTC)
- Received the Dominosteins! Expect an alt soon! Kaldari (talk) 22:46, 4 March 2014 (UTC)
- I really support that opinion; this is really an unbelievable loophole. (However, since I already voted, I am not going to change it) --CyberXRef☎ 03:18, 1 March 2014 (UTC)
- That is true, but in my view it is a loophole. The use of such licensing has long been deprecated on the en and de wikis. I'm surprised it's still allowed on Commons. Regardless, since I can't practically use this image anywhere besides Wikipedia without violating the licensing terms, I can't in good faith consider it one of our best works. I know this is a contentious opinion, and not strictly covered by the FPC criteria, but in this case I would prefer to ignore all rules :) If that means my opinion is disregarded, so be it. Kaldari (talk) 18:33, 28 February 2014 (UTC)
- I dread to rehash that lengthy discussion on Commons, but I note in protest (although I understand your position) that the English Wikipedia does not have any policies banning images with this license from FAC. — Crisco 1492 (talk) 08:34, 28 February 2014 (UTC)
Promoted File:Dominostein edelherb.jpg --Armbrust The Homunculus 00:46, 5 March 2014 (UTC)