Wikipedia:Good article reassessment/Pennsylvania Turnpike/1

The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.


Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · WatchWatch article reassessment pageMost recent review
Result: Delisted. Charlotte (Queen of Heartstalk) 18:34, 15 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Article has gotten out of hand since 2012 promotion.

  • WP:TOOBIG concerns, article is 227,901 bytes and needs some trimming.
  • Lots of cases where several sentences in a row begin with "In (year), blah blah happened." over and over, so a copy edit is needed.
  • "Service Plaza" sub-header has several one-sentence paragraphs and excessive detail, along with more cases of several sentences in a row beginning with "In (year)".
  • Had an "in popular culture" section of trivial tangential name-drops, which I snipped out.
  • External links seem excessive.
  • PA Highways site tagged as unreliable self-published source.

Ten Pound Hammer(What did I screw up now?) 01:20, 7 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

How else are you supposed to write a history section for a road article? They typically announce things at a specific date, even if they had planned to do it a long time before. Same with the service plaza section. Cfeddse (talk) 03:07, 10 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
You vary the sentence structure and length. When literally every sentence begins with "In (year)..." it's boring and clunky and doesn't flow well. It's a basic rule of writing. Ten Pound Hammer(What did I screw up now?) 03:10, 10 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.