Toolbox |
---|
This peer review discussion is closed. |
I've listed this article for peer review because... GA attempt. The reception likely sucks, I didn't enjoy doing it ughhhhhhhhh. please look out for other things and typos things that are unclear and other suggestions of there are any
Thanks, Chchcheckit (talk) 12:44, 11 July 2023 (UTC)
Comments from Z1720
editComments after a quick skim:
- Suggest splitting up longer paragraphs for readability. Typically try to have each paragraph be between 4-6 sentences.
- The "Critical" section falls into the "X says Y" pattern and uses a lot of quotes. Consult WP:RECEPTION for ideas on how to summarise critiques and avoid this pattern.
Those are my only thoughts. Z1720 (talk) 21:33, 22 July 2023 (UTC)