Wikipedia:Requests for undeletion/Archive 101

Archive 95

←

Archive 99

Archive 100

Archive 101

Archive 102

Archive 103

→

Archive 105

Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/MANTA Mui Ne: Development of new national sport of Sailing for Vietnam

• Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/MANTA Mui Ne: Development of new national sport of Sailing for Vietnam · ( logs | links | watch ) · [revisions]

I, MANTA Mui Ne, request the undeletion of this Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please userfy or restore as appropriate. MANTA Mui Ne (talk) 03:21, 10 September 2013 (UTC)

Dear HasteurBot,

Apologies, i let this article expire. If you can resurrect it, i shall review and consider rewriting it soonest, especially as i believe there was a conflict of interest issue i first had to understand/resolve (and i do not remember the exact article).

There were some other issues which distracted me,

(a) a land-grab mudslide issue: https://vimeo.com/72533622 password: manta

(b) national sailing development (probono) duties which included an intensive International Olympic Committee scholarship course to draw the national sailing plan (with kiteboarding, windsurfing, dinghy and keelboat sailing), while the sail-trained fishermen ran the sailing school to international standards of sailing and safety.

Thanks for your time on this.

Please let me know if you have any questions on Vietnam's sailing.

Best wishes, Julia MANTA Mui Ne (talk) 03:21, 10 September 2013 (UTC)MANTA Mui Ne

• Done - as an Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13, the page has been restored on request. Please edit the page to address the issues raised when it was declined, and re-submit it; "Articles for creation" is not for the indefinite hosting of material found to be unsuitable for inclusion in the encyclopedia. Graeme Bartlett (talk) 09:55, 10 September 2013 (UTC)

Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Mohamed Mouldi Kefi

• Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Mohamed Mouldi Kefi · ( logs | links | watch ) · [revisions]

I, 15.203.169.123, request the undeletion of this Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please userfy or restore as appropriate. 15.203.169.123 (talk) 06:17, 10 September 2013 (UTC)

• Done Graeme Bartlett (talk) 09:05, 10 September 2013 (UTC)

...but deleted as the article already exists in main space at Mouldi Kefi, see below. JohnCD (talk) 16:34, 10 September 2013 (UTC)

Mohamed Mouldi Kefi

• Mohamed Mouldi Kefi · ( talk | logs | history | links | watch ) · [revisions]

public figure (Foreign Minister of Tunisia) -15.203.169.107 (talk) 06:20, 10 September 2013 (UTC)

• Not done - a deleted page with this name does not appear to exist. Graeme Bartlett (talk) 09:07, 10 September 2013 (UTC)

• There was an article about him at Mouldi Kefi. I have  Done a redirect to it from Mohamed Mouldi Kefi. JohnCD (talk) 10:48, 10 September 2013 (UTC)

Two balls and a wall

• Two balls and a wall · ( talk | logs | links | watch | afd ) · [revisions]

reasoning -203.97.96.27 (talk) 10:31, 10 September 2013 (UTC)

Done - as a contested proposed deletion, the article has been restored on request. I will notify user Swpb (talk), who proposed it, and who may choose to nominate it at WP:Articles for deletion, which would start a debate lasting seven days, to which you would be welcome to contribute. The article needs references to verify what it says and establish WP:Notability. JohnCD (talk) 10:43, 10 September 2013 (UTC)

AfD'd. —Swpb^{talk•contribs} 14:01, 10 September 2013 (UTC)

Siegfried Hall (University of Notre Dame)

• Siegfried Hall (University of Notre Dame) · ( talk | logs | history | links | watch | afd ) · [revisions]

The article was deleted for "a lack of sources and notability". It is my understanding that the article was sufficiently sourced and notability had been established. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 66.254.242.180 (talk) 13:10, 10 September 2013 (UTC)

Done - as a contested proposed deletion, the article has been restored on request. To establish notability, the article needs more references to "significant coverage in reliable sources that are independent of the subject", i.e. from outside the University. See WP:Notability (summary) and Wikipedia:College and university article guidelines. JohnCD (talk) 16:22, 10 September 2013 (UTC)

Louis Armstrong discography

• Louis Armstrong discography · ( talk | logs | history | links | watch ) · [revisions]

I feel that with a large number of albums, it would be of use to have a list of them. The old page was badly made but i would happily remake it as i have all the information needed to so. -95.147.121.50 (talk) 14:15, 10 September 2013 (UTC)

 Done - what was there was a redirect, which was deleted at this RfD specifically to encourage production of an article. You can see in the history that there was initially an attempt at an article, but it was scrappy and unsourced, and I don't think it will be much help to you. JohnCD (talk) 15:44, 10 September 2013 (UTC)

Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/GSCopyPro

• Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/GSCopyPro · ( logs | links | watch ) · [revisions]

We are in the process of getting up the page article that was written by TechNet from MS to confirm support gscopypro. we should see it online in the next 30 days we are told. please restore it so we can submit it for approval once that article is produced. -71.178.35.37 (talk) 16:17, 10 September 2013 (UTC)

Done - as an Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13, the page has been restored on request. Please edit the page to address the issues raised when it was declined, and re-submit it; "Articles for creation" is not for the indefinite hosting of material found to be unsuitable for inclusion in the encyclopedia. JohnCD (talk) 16:25, 10 September 2013 (UTC)

Free RPG Day

• Free RPG Day · ( talk | logs | history | links | watch ) · [revisions]

REASONING 1.The speedy deletion criteria cited in the speedy deletion notice was that it "appeared to be about a club." This is not correct; Free RPG Day is not a club. 2. Free RPG Day is more properly categorized as an ongoing special even such as International Museum Day, Free Comic Book Day, Comic-Con or Gen Con, or a social movement such as the Occupy movement. 3. The article was speedily deleted without discussion or a chance to respond. 4.Free RPG Day is similar to Free Comic Book Day, and that page was not deleted. 5. It is possible that the Free Comic Book Day article and the Free RPG Day article could be merged, but it might be more confusing that way. 6. If the notability of Free Comic Book Day is under dispute, then it should be the subject of discussion and NOT speedy deletion. 7. If more reasons are needed, please let me know. 8. If the article needs more or better citations, fixes, editing for language, a rewrite, and update, or some other fix, the answer is not speedy deletion. 9. If the nature of Free RPG Day is unclear from the article, I or someone else should fix that, but I can't fix an article that is gone and I'd rather not start again from scratch. 10. I JUST GOT the notice of proposed speedy deletion today. It seems a bit disingenuous to put something in speedy deletion when a very similar page (Free Comic Book Day) should have been obvious as a sister event. Also, I don't know how it "appears to be a club." 11. When I created the article, I tried to figure out a place to put it as a sub-article. However, there really isn't a place that I could identify as a proper main article because it is not really a subsidiary of Free Comic Book Day, although there are some crossover participants. 12. The article will be helpful to any person seeking information for a school report, as a fan, as a journalist, or as a current or potential participant in Free RPG Day, which is an international event. --Vampyrecat (talk) 16:42, 10 September 2013 (UTC) -Vampyrecat (talk) 16:42, 10 September 2013 (UTC)

P.S. If you follow this link to my user page, you will find citations that I found today and plan to add to the article. This will update the article. More importantly, these links and the accompanying text will help improve the scope and clarity of the article by explaining Free RPG Day more comprehensively. --Vampyrecat (talk) 18:12, 10 September 2013 (UTC)

Userfied - the page has been restored to the userspace at User:Vampyrecat/Free RPG Day. You may work on improving the article's assertion of notability at its new location, but please contact RHaworth (talk · contribs), the administrator who deleted the page, before moving it back to the article space. Please see the criteria for speedy deletion and the relevant notability guidelines - articles that are not in compliance will be deleted. JohnCD (talk) 20:00, 10 September 2013 (UTC)

Bureau des Avocats Internationaux

• Bureau des Avocats Internationaux · ( talk | logs | links | watch | afd ) · [revisions]

there was no discussion on the deletion, the issue regarding legitimacy of the law office can be easily addressed, for example the Head Manager of the Office, Mario Joseph, has been awarded for his work as a Lawyer through this organization which was cited on the original page -129.74.237.111 (talk) 17:35, 10 September 2013 (UTC)

Done - as a contested proposed deletion, the article has been restored on request. I will notify user Thargor Orlando (talk), who proposed it, and who may choose to nominate it at WP:Articles for deletion, which would start a debate lasting seven days, to which you would be welcome to contribute. The issue is not legitimacy but Wikipedia's inclusion criterion of WP:Notability, which requires references showing significant coverage in reliable, independent secondary sources. JohnCD (talk) 19:43, 10 September 2013 (UTC)

Chronolabs

• Chronolabs · ( talk | logs | links | watch ) · [revisions]

reasoning -Mynamesnot (talk) 18:45, 10 September 2013 (UTC)

I am still in the processes of adjusting this page.. For example if someone could tell me what needs to be changed, I really want to have my page here for this cooperative as it is run by one the Founders of the Modern Internet.. You can see his twitter http://twitter.com/negativitygear

I have had continual problems updating another page I created when you first started back around 2004 called 'doof' the operators are to swift and ungreweling.

Not done - this article has not been restored because it does not appear to meet our guidelines for inclusion of articles about companies. In general, Wikipedia considers a topic to be notable if there exist multiple reliable sources of information on the topic, external to the subject itself. Articles concerning companies will be deleted on sight if they are considered to be unambiguous advertising or promotion, or if they do not contain a credible assertion of the significance of the subject.

That was nothing like an encyclopedia article. It was an advertisement, written in the first person: "Being a co-op allows us to offer you a wide range of options... We firmly believe that family is a priority... " full of promotional fluff: "the very best in Open Source web and portal development... skilled team of translators, graphic designers and programmers to develop you a fantastic web portal... " and listing your charges.

Or maybe it was a joke? "Total assets: AUD$ 7.6 undecillion (2013)" That alone qualifies it for speedy deletion as a blatant hoax. Pull the other one, and try Myspace. JohnCD (talk) 19:32, 10 September 2013 (UTC)

Simon Antony Roberts

• Simon Antony Roberts · ( talk | logs | links | watch ) · [revisions]

reasoning -Mynamesnot (talk) 18:48, 10 September 2013 (UTC)

This is one of the founder of the internet... I am creating a profile after reviewing and doing a biograph with him.. As a child he was involved via UseNet in designing and standarising IPv4 and in 2005 help standarise again IPv6 on comp.protocol.. It is a component of the page on his business Chronolabs

Not done - this article has not been restored because it does not appear to meet our guidelines for inclusion of articles about people. In general, Wikipedia considers a topic to be notable if there exist multiple reliable sources of information on the topic, external to the subject itself. Articles concerning people will be deleted on sight if they are considered to be unambiguous advertising or promotion, or if they do not contain a credible assertion of the significance of the subject.

That was also nothing like an encyclopedia article, starting as a detailed biography about his music teacher and his Commodore Vic20, then a part about IP protocols (he invented them at age 13 but they were plagiarised from him?) and wandering into first-person reflections on this and that. Wikipedia is not a blog, or a place to publish reminiscences. Check out Wikipedia:Verifiability: "any material challenged or likely to be challenged must be attributed to a reliable, published source". JohnCD (talk) 20:18, 10 September 2013 (UTC)

Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Reverse Osmosis Antiscalant

• Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Reverse Osmosis Antiscalant · ( logs | links | watch ) · [revisions]

66.35.153.130 (talk) 20:07, 10 September 2013 (UTC)

Done - as an Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13, the page has been restored on request. Please edit the page to address the issues raised when it was declined, and re-submit it; "Articles for creation" is not for the indefinite hosting of material found to be unsuitable for inclusion in the encyclopedia. Monty₈₄₅ 20:15, 10 September 2013 (UTC)

File:Dunn's yellow rose design.jpg

• File:Dunn's yellow rose design.jpg · ( talk | logs | links | watch ) · [revisions]

Speaking as an OTRS agent, the copyright holders have provided a sufficient statement to freely relicense their work at VRTS ticket # 2013081710003051 for use here. I request the above image be restored along with the following:

• File:Dunn's rose design, two colors.jpg
• File:Dunn's cactus design.jpg
• File:Dunn's stitching closeup.jpg
• File:Charlie Dunn 1977.jpg
• File:Dunn's flax threads.jpg
• File:Dunn's mirror image text.jpg
• File:Lee Miller, Charlie Dunn, Don Counts.jpg
• File:Charlie Dunn making boots.jpg -I, JethroBT ^{drop me a line} 17:38, 10 September 2013 (UTC)

All  Done except the third in the list, which has never existed at that title, or any of half a dozen variations I tried. All that I have done is remove the di-no-permission tags, and write "OTRS ticket 2013081710003051" in the "Permission" line. If more than that is required, please do it, or explain to the requester how to do it. JohnCD (talk) 22:08, 10 September 2013 (UTC)

Thanks! I believe the issue for the third file is related to a misspelling. The image is here: File:Dunn's_stictching_closeup.jpg. I can move this file to the correct spelling after it has been restored. I, JethroBT ^{drop me a line} 22:22, 10 September 2013 (UTC)

 Done, and moved. That's one variation I didn't try! JohnCD (talk) 08:24, 11 September 2013 (UTC)

Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Extended PLM

• Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Extended PLM · ( logs | links | watch ) · [revisions]

I, Phmedia, request the undeletion of this Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please userfy or restore as appropriate. Not clear why this page was deleted. there is an existing entry about PLM which discusses what PLM is etc. This is a similar article, except it talks about a broader process called Extended PLM which applies specifically to retail. Please advise on how I can complete this article to Wikipedia standards. -Phmedia (talk) 07:17, 11 September 2013 (UTC)

Done - as an Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13, the page has been restored on request. Please edit the page to address the issues raised when it was declined, and re-submit it; "Articles for creation" is not for the indefinite hosting of material found to be unsuitable for inclusion in the encyclopedia.

The first version you submitted was declined because it had no content; then you added content, but you never clicked the "Re-submit" button, so it has just been sitting there. However, it needs more work before it could be accepted, particularly more references to significant coverage in reliable, independent secondary sources to show that the term is in general use and establish Wikipedia:Notability. If it is just a proprietary term invented by Core Solutions, it would not be acceptable - see WP:Wikipedia is not a dictionary#Neologisms. JohnCD (talk) 08:54, 11 September 2013 (UTC)

Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Andrew Campbell Shipbuilder and Farmer

• Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Andrew Campbell Shipbuilder and Farmer · ( logs | links | watch ) · [revisions]

I, 121.73.241.250, request the undeletion of this Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please userfy or restore as appropriate. 121.73.241.250 (talk) 09:17, 11 September 2013 (UTC)

I thought that my submission had already been deleted hence the reason why I have not responded. I really do not understand what you wnat me to do in relation to the article. What is wrong with it ? Some easy to understand guidance would be appreciated. Regards, Lindsay campbell

• Done - as an Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13, the page has been restored on request. Please edit the page to address the issues raised when it was declined, and re-submit it; "Articles for creation" is not for the indefinite hosting of material found to be unsuitable for inclusion in the encyclopedia. Hi Lindsay campbell, to get your article accepted I can make these suggestions. There are some vague sources, but most are too generic to use. For example "New Zealand Electoral Roll" should have a year and possibly a page number or section (eg electorate) so that someone could confirm. "Seaman’s records" is extremely vague. Family anecdotes are not usable here as they are not published, and so count as not verifyable. Also we need to tell which facts came from which source. Graeme Bartlett (talk) 09:58, 11 September 2013 (UTC)

Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Idrissa Camara

• Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Idrissa Camara · ( logs | links | watch ) · [revisions]

Khadyetou (talk) 10:28, 11 September 2013 (UTC)

Done - as an Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13, the page has been restored on request. Please edit the page to address the issues raised when it was declined, and re-submit it; "Articles for creation" is not for the indefinite hosting of material found to be unsuitable for inclusion in the encyclopedia. JohnCD (talk) 11:03, 11 September 2013 (UTC)

Creating Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/X1

• Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/X1 · ( logs | history | links | watch ) · [revisions]

I believe this article was originally insufficiently supported by other documentation. As well as more on-line references, several international, respected, physical magazines now have articles that I can add as citations/references. So I would like to update and re-submit this article.

Thanks!! Martin Dixon (talk) 10:54, 11 September 2013 (UTC)

• Done - as an Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13, the page has been restored on request. Please edit the page to address the issues raised when it was declined, and re-submit it; "Articles for creation" is not for the indefinite hosting of material found to be unsuitable for inclusion in the encyclopedia. Graeme Bartlett (talk) 12:16, 11 September 2013 (UTC)

Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Keith Richards' 1953 Fender Telecaster "Micawber"

• Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Keith Richards' 1953 Fender Telecaster "Micawber" · ( logs | links | watch ) · [revisions]

I, UOJComm, request the undeletion of this Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please userfy or restore as appropriate. UOJComm (talk) 18:27, 11 September 2013 (UTC)

• Done - as an Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13, the page has been restored on request. Please edit the page to address the issues raised when it was declined, and re-submit it; "Articles for creation" is not for the indefinite hosting of material found to be unsuitable for inclusion in the encyclopedia. Graeme Bartlett (talk) 21:03, 11 September 2013 (UTC)

BillFloat Inc

• BillFloat Inc · ( talk | logs | links | watch ) · [revisions]

I, DeBellis, request the undeletion of this Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please userfy or restore as appropriate. I will have another go at finding the references needed. -Ddebellis1 (talk) 19:52, 11 September 2013 (UTC)

• You will actually be wanting BillFloat, Inc · ( talk | logs | links | watch ) · [revisions] deleted by criterion A7 no claim of importance. Is there a reason this page should be in the encyclopedia? Graeme Bartlett (talk) 21:02, 11 September 2013 (UTC)

Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/G. DaPonte

• Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/G. DaPonte · ( logs | links | watch ) · [revisions]

Hello, I'm seeking the content of the original G. DaPonte entery? I wish to add additional content to update and resubmit.

Thank you! Dimgalaxy (talk) 22:03, 11 September 2013 (UTC)

Done - as an Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13, the page has been restored on request. Please edit the page to address the issues raised when it was declined, and re-submit it; "Articles for creation" is not for the indefinite hosting of material found to be unsuitable for inclusion in the encyclopedia. Check out WP:Your first article and WP:Notability (music). JohnCD (talk) 08:48, 12 September 2013 (UTC)

Aboobacker Amani

• Aboobacker Amani · ( talk | logs | links | watch ) · [revisions]

reasoning -Theamani (talk) 00:22, 12 September 2013 (UTC)

Not done - this article has not been restored because it does not appear to meet our guidelines for inclusion of articles about people. In general, Wikipedia considers a topic to be notable if there exist multiple reliable sources of information on the topic, external to the subject itself. Articles concerning people will be deleted on sight if they are considered to be unambiguous advertising or promotion, or if they do not contain a credible assertion of the significance of the subject. If you are Aboobacker Amani, please understand that Wikipedia is not a place for people to write about themselves or post their CVs - see Wikipedia is not about YOU and Wikipedia:Autobiography. JohnCD (talk) 08:53, 12 September 2013 (UTC)

Mohammed Fahad Al Harthi

• Mohammed Fahad Al Harthi · ( talk | logs | links | watch ) · [revisions]

it is a good profile one and can be improved to reflect Wikipedia standards -Maisa Khudair (talk) 08:20, 12 September 2013 (UTC)

 Question: - what was the exact title of the deleted article? There has never been an article at Mohammed Fahad Al Harthi, and I have tried all the variations I can think of. If you do not know the exact title, do you know the username of the account that created the article? JohnCD (talk) 08:42, 12 September 2013 (UTC)

Miss Anne

• Miss Anne · ( talk | logs | history | links | watch ) · [revisions]

reasoning -Agalus (talk) 13:36, 12 September 2013 (UTC) While wikipedia is not a dictionary, it does provide context of culturally and socially relevant terms that may not be understood by the lay reader. In academia and certainly in literature, Miss Anne is a term that is loaded with historical relevance. It's a very specific expression used to refer to a group of women in a particular, unusual context.

Done - as a contested proposed deletion, the article has been restored on request; but I have replaced it by a redirect to the existing article Miss Ann, which is about the same subject, and I suggest you add any new information to that. From a Google search, "Miss Ann" returns slightly more hits that "Miss Anne", so is probably the better title for the article. JohnCD (talk) 14:37, 12 September 2013 (UTC)

Note: the previous content of Miss Anne is still there in the history. JohnCD (talk) 20:33, 12 September 2013 (UTC)

Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/WikiArguments

• Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/WikiArguments · ( logs | links | watch ) · [revisions]

I, 66.189.88.60, request the undeletion of this Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please userfy or restore as appropriate. 66.189.88.60 (talk) 14:53, 12 September 2013 (UTC)

Done - as an Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13, the page has been restored on request. Please edit the page to address the issues raised when it was declined, and re-submit it; "Articles for creation" is not for the indefinite hosting of material found to be unsuitable for inclusion in the encyclopedia. JohnCD (talk) 20:26, 12 September 2013 (UTC)

senthilss74

• [[:]] · ( [[|talk]] | logs | links | watch | afd | mfd ) · [revisions]

(This user used the preload form for AFC undeletion, but did not specify the name of the AFC draft they would like undeleted. Consider checking their deleted contributions.) senthilss74 17:37, 12 September 2013 (UTC)

You have had these two deleted. Do you want either restored?

• Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/April 27 · ( logs | links | watch ) · [revisions]
• Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/SS74 · ( logs | links | watch ) · [revisions]
  • Graeme Bartlett (talk) 21:25, 12 September 2013 (UTC)

King Kong Cone

• King Kong Cone · ( talk | logs | links | watch ) · [revisions]

I just want to retrieve the document so I can save it or screenshot it and show it to my teacher. Please undelete this article so I can at least save it, I need it for school. -GMPmovies (talk) 00:58, 13 September 2013 (UTC)

Not done - this is not an appropriate topic for inclusion on Wikipedia. Please see Wikipedia's notability guidelines. Wikipedia does not accept articles which consist of original research, or which lack any reliable sources of information. I don't see how restoration of the article will benefit the Wikipedia project. Wikipedia is not a public storage space for personal homework assignments. You had ample opportunity to save the article yourself instead of removing the speedy deletion template. ~Amatulić (talk) 01:37, 13 September 2013 (UTC)

Sphero

• Sphero · ( talk | logs | history | links | watch ) · [revisions]

The information on that page was correct and is from reliable sources. The page was made by a banned user (Which rule G5 states that banned users can't make pages), but the page is made correctly. So, there was no need to delete it. -Pikachu4170 (talk) 23:41, 12 September 2013 (UTC)

• Comment: The "correctness" of the page is not relevant. The banned user in question is one of several hundred socks of the case documented in Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Morning277. I deleted and protected the article from being recreated (since it was created multiple times), so I won't take action on this one, but just wanted to provide the context. WP:CSD#G5 is there for a reason. ~Amatulić (talk) 01:32, 13 September 2013 (UTC)

I think the team at Orbotix (The company behind Sphero) is not gonna like it when they realize the page is gone... If you still don't want to restore it, at least save it on some Sandbox kind of page just for me... Pikachu4170 (talk) 01:49, 13 September 2013 (UTC)

Not done and will not be done. If they don't like it, they can ask for their money back, and perhaps the word will get around that Wikipedia doesn't take paid editing. Morning277 is an industrial-grade spammer, deliberately operating below the radar by starting a new sock account for each client - over 300 identified so far. If we keep his "good" articles, the ban is completely ineffective, he can just go on starting new socks and throwing in his paid-for articles to see which will stick. The only way to put him out of business is to see that all his paying clients find their articles deleted. That's why the policy is WP:BAN#Bans apply to all editing, good or bad. If we let him go on, we might just as well take paid ads and collect the money ourselves. JohnCD (talk) 08:09, 13 September 2013 (UTC)

Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Lars Rüetschi

• Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Lars Rüetschi · ( logs | links | watch ) · [revisions]

178.195.5.218 (talk) 09:17, 13 September 2013 (UTC)

Done - as an Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13, the page has been restored on request. Please edit the page to address the issues raised when it was declined, and re-submit it; "Articles for creation" is not for the indefinite hosting of material found to be unsuitable for inclusion in the encyclopedia. There is a list of references, but many are deadlinks, or unreliable sources like Youtube, or do not mention him. See WP:Notability (summary) for the sort of references required. JohnCD (talk) 10:32, 13 September 2013 (UTC)

Phase Eight

• Phase Eight · ( talk | logs | history | links | watch ) · [revisions]

I had tried to write a potted history for Phase Eight. With a bit of knowledge of the company i have picked up from other sources. I could see the company referenced on a page for Long Tall Sally and wanted to make sure it linked to the company info, as the page didn't exist. The speedy deletion tag was placed on the article and within seconds it had been deleted! I did not have a chance to contest. It is not writen as an advertisment, it was meant to be knowledge of who the company is. I am happy to have it amended if it sounds like an advert but i don't feel it should have been deleted without the chance to amend. -concrete-cabbage (talk) 11:39, 13 September 2013 (UTC)

 Done See User:Hannah.crawford/Phase Eight--SPhilbrick(Talk) 12:00, 13 September 2013 (UTC)

Make A Film Foundation

• Make A Film Foundation · ( talk | logs | history | links | watch ) · [revisions]

Hello! I am working to create and continue editing the Make A Film Foundation article. It was deleted today. Please help if you can. It would be greatly appreciated!

Thanks! DivaKavis — Preceding unsigned comment added by DivaKavis (talk • contribs) 02:24, 13 September 2013 (UTC)

I have moved this request down, because new entries are normally posted at the bottom of discussion pages, and a new entry posted at the top is likely to be overlooked.

Not done. The article was deleted from the main encyclopedia because it reads more like a press release than an encyclopedia article, and because, being connected with the Foundation, you have from Wikipedia's point of view a WP:Conflict of interest, and so should not be posting articles about it directly. Wikipedia is not a "notice-board" site like Myspace or Facebook for people or organizations to talk about themselves. Please read the Wikipedia:Plain and simple conflict of interest guide and Wikipedia is not here to tell the world about your noble cause.

The article is still available for you to work on at Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Make A Film Foundation. Submission via Articles for creation will ensure that the article is checked by an uninvolved user, who will either accept it or give you feedback. JohnCD (talk) 14:06, 13 September 2013 (UTC)

Talk:IPhone 3G S

• IPhone 3G S · ( talk | logs | history | links | watch ) · [revisions]

Deleted under no-longer-valid part of CSD. Also apparently contains important merger discussion. -Marcus Qwertyus (talk) 17:55, 13 September 2013 (UTC)

 Done. JohnCD (talk) 18:03, 13 September 2013 (UTC)

Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Oxford Hawks Hockey Club

• Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Oxford Hawks Hockey Club · ( logs | links | watch ) · [revisions]

I, 80.6.81.154, request the undeletion of this Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please userfy or restore as appropriate. Work in Progress - need more time to complete. 80.6.81.154 (talk) 22:23, 13 September 2013 (UTC)

Done - as an Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13, the page has been restored on request. Please edit the page to address the issues raised when it was declined, and re-submit it; "Articles for creation" is not for the indefinite hosting of material found to be unsuitable for inclusion in the encyclopedia. - this has not been touched for over two years. JohnCD (talk) 11:27, 14 September 2013 (UTC)

Pyramid (card game)

• Pyramid (card game) · ( talk | logs | history | links | watch | afd ) · [revisions]

The article is an educational source of information for people who study gaming, card games, game theory, card game history, etc. -68.210.9.117 (talk) 03:48, 14 September 2013 (UTC) The article was deleted based on the claim that it was a 'Non-notable derivative game based on a TV series' which, by the way, it was not 'based on a TV series' at all but rather was used in the series and therefore taken from the series, not based on it. The game itself is still widely available for purchase on the internet and available in 2 different variations that I know of.

Done - as a contested proposed deletion, the article has been restored on request. I will notify user Ckatz (talk), who proposed it, and who may choose to nominate it at WP:Articles for deletion, which would start a debate lasting seven days, to which you would be welcome to contribute. The article needs better references, both to verify what it says and to show the significant coverage in reliable, independent secondary sources necessary to establish notability. JohnCD (talk) 11:37, 14 September 2013 (UTC)

Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Dean Williams "Welsh Road Warrior" (Boxer)

• Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Dean Williams "Welsh Road Warrior" (Boxer) · ( logs | links | watch ) · [revisions]

<text of article removed>— Preceding unsigned comment added by 108.50.0.80 (talk) 04:52, 14 September 2013 (UTC)

 Done: this has not been deleted, but you never submitted it for review, so it has just been sitting there. There was a glitch which meant that the text did not show, but I have fixed that. When you are ready, click the green "Submit your draft " button; but first, you need to add references to reliable, published sources to verify what the article says. Click "show" beside "How to improve your article" in the box at the top for links to useful advice. JohnCD (talk) 11:22, 14 September 2013 (UTC)

lovetone

• Lovetone · ( talk | logs | history | links | watch | afd ) · [revisions]

Guitar effects pedal manufacturer, now defunct, with previously sold pedals becoming very expensive and high prices demanded in the boutique and second-hand market. Original article deleted due to lack of references. -158.28.225.226 (talk) 02:56, 15 September 2013 (UTC)

•  Done Graeme Bartlett (talk) 10:45, 15 September 2013 (UTC)

Where is the debate about restoring this article?Tomintoul (talk) 14:24, 15 September 2013 (UTC)

An article deleted by WP:PROD is automatically restored on request, see WP:DEL#Proposed deletion; no debate is required. You are welcome to start one by nominating it at WP:Articles for deletion. JohnCD (talk) 15:29, 15 September 2013 (UTC)

Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/The Hornyfrogs

• Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/The Hornyfrogs · ( logs | links | watch ) · [revisions]

Jlmqc (talk) 03:24, 15 September 2013 (UTC)

• This page has not yet been deleted. Please visit the page to find out how to object to the deletion request. To avoid deletion please improve the page. Graeme Bartlett (talk) 10:47, 15 September 2013 (UTC)

Muhammed_feroz

• Muhammed Feroz · ( talk | logs | links | watch ) · [revisions]

reasoning -Muhammedferoz (talk) 11:11, 15 September 2013 (UTC)

 Not done. Wikipedia is not a place for people to write about themselves. JohnCD (talk) 15:33, 15 September 2013 (UTC)

Harvin Kumar Sunnia

• Harvin Kumar Sunnia · ( talk | logs | links | watch ) · [revisions]

reasoning -Nhks9 (talk) 17:26, 15 September 2013 (UTC) I will make it better explanation

• Not done - this article has not been restored because it does not appear to meet our guidelines for inclusion of articles about people. In general, Wikipedia considers a topic to be notable if there exist multiple reliable sources of information on the topic, external to the subject itself. Articles concerning people will be deleted on sight if they are considered to be unambiguous advertising or promotion, or if they do not contain a credible assertion of the significance of the subject. Graeme Bartlett (talk) 21:19, 15 September 2013 (UTC)

dr vipin brar

• Dr vipin brar · ( talk | logs | links | watch ) · [revisions]

Hello, Thanks for review but i did read the guidelines and rules before submitting this article, this is not about me and all data is verifiable by proper authenticated documents and media like newspaper cuttings which i can forward you. This page is made as a tribute to Dr. Vipin Brar who revolutionized the doctor's profession and his visionary leadership has helped recruiting thousands of doctors by Government in Punjab. In my view, he saved many lives and does deserve some credit.

In Punjab He's a big personality. This page is in no way a autobiography or advertisement and instead do serve as a report of historical event that took place in Punjab. -Coolvipcandy (talk) 18:32, 15 September 2013 (UTC)

It was deleted as promotional. I think this tone can be corrected though. The references to newspapers are a bit vague however. Do you have the newspaper name, and dates published and page numbers too? Or a link to the web page? I would suggest that you work in a sandbox at User:Coolvipcandy/Vipin Brar. If you can agree to this I can put your old article there. Graeme Bartlett (talk) 20:49, 15 September 2013 (UTC)

Matt Strevens

• Matt Strevens · ( talk | logs | links | watch ) · [revisions]

Deleted under PROD rulings. I believe it was unfairly deleted and therefore object to its deletion -92.0.219.21 (talk) 19:51, 15 September 2013 (UTC)

• Done however references will have to be added soon to avoid being deleted again. Graeme Bartlett (talk) 21:13, 15 September 2013 (UTC)

Nava Certus

• Nava_Certus · ( talk | logs | links | watch ) · [revisions]

The page was tagged as G11, however, Wikipedia's own policy states: "Note: An article about a company or a product which describes its subject from a neutral point of view does not qualify for this criterion. This article was written from a neutral perspective. Ample references and information was provided to back up any claims." -MkhitarSparapet (talk) 01:52, 15 September 2013 (UTC)

I'll have to disagree - once the advertisement article started to talk about "Capabilities" (about 1/3 of the overall text), it entered into the realm of "unambiguous promotion". As I see not suggestion of notability. Two of your "refs" are back to the company itself, and the other 2 ref's are not at all related to the company - one merely is a Gartner article that lists cloud providers, not companies providing solutions ES&L 10:18, 16 September 2013 (UTC)

IHC Sealing Solutions

• IHC Sealing Solutions · ( talk | logs | links | watch ) · [revisions]

reasoning -Melvin seals (talk) 08:57, 16 September 2013 (UTC)

After consult of Dewritech I added notable sources and also used historical information out our history book.

Best regards, Melvin seals

• Hi, we need to have independent sources here. The rename story looks to be some kind of press release, and I cannot tell what is in the book, but it does look substantial. Can you find another independent reference? Graeme Bartlett (talk) 10:52, 16 September 2013 (UTC)

Carnavon Castle

• Carnavon Castle · ( talk | logs | history | links | watch ) · [revisions]

reasoning -Jb1944 (talk) 09:22, 16 September 2013 (UTC)

Do you mean Caernarfon Castle? I've created the above as a redirect. --Rob Sinden (talk) 10:46, 16 September 2013 (UTC)

Arjun (Feroz Khan)

• [[:]] · ( [[|talk]] | logs | links | watch | afd | mfd ) · [revisions]

(This user used the preload form for AFC undeletion, but did not specify the name of the AFC draft they would like undeleted. Consider checking their deleted contributions.) Rahulrajmehra (talk) 10:52, 16 September 2013 (UTC)

• Done - as an Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13, the page has been restored on request. Please edit the page to address the issues raised when it was declined, and re-submit it; "Articles for creation" is not for the indefinite hosting of material found to be unsuitable for inclusion in the encyclopedia. is this the same person as Feroz Khan? You will need references to support your page. Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Arjun (Feroz Khan) Graeme Bartlett (talk) 11:17, 16 September 2013 (UTC)

Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/McNaughton Incorporated

• Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/McNaughton Incorporated · ( logs | links | watch ) · [revisions]

I, Tjsusan, request the undeletion of this Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please userfy or restore as appropriate. McNaughton Incorporated is a company that manufactures consumer products for the home and garden. The company was founded in 1985 by Patrick McNaughton and Jamie McNaughton. Tjsusan (talk) 14:59, 16 September 2013 (UTC)

Done - as an Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13, the page has been restored on request. Please edit the page to address the issues raised when it was declined, and re-submit it; "Articles for creation" is not for the indefinite hosting of material found to be unsuitable for inclusion in the encyclopedia. JohnCD (talk) 18:41, 16 September 2013 (UTC)

Phineas and Ferb: Summer Belongs to You!

• Summer belongs to you · ( talk | logs | links | watch ) · [revisions]

It is a special episode of the show Phineas and Ferb it's notable -19:21, 16 September 2013 (UTC)98.169.63.91 (talk)

Not done - a deleted page with this name does not appear to exist. This is actually at Summer Belongs To You but is just a redirect. If you go to https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Summer_Belongs_To_You&redirect=no you can then edit this to create an article. Graeme Bartlett (talk) 20:59, 16 September 2013 (UTC)

 Comment: - Phineas and Ferb: Summer Belongs To You! was redirected after Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Phineas and Ferb: Summer Belongs To You! (2nd nomination) and protected after people edit-warred to restore it; so you should check with the closing admin, Jujutacular (talk), before making this an article again. JohnCD (talk) 22:16, 16 September 2013 (UTC)

Lana Buchyk

• Lana buchyk · ( talk | logs | links | watch ) · [revisions]

I now have reliable sources to insert in the article -Atevs3 (talk) 22:34, 16 September 2013 (UTC)

 Not done. Lana buchyk was a copyright violation from http://lanabuchyk.com/?page_id=69, so cannot be restored - see WP:Copy-paste. In any case, it was in a far too promotional and unencyclopedic style: "Due to her charisma and extroverted personality, new opportunities soon flooded in... " etc. You will have to write in your own words, and take care to use a neutral point of view - no opinions, no glowing adjectives, just plain facts of what she has achieved, cited to reliable sources. Read WP:Your first article for advice. JohnCD (talk) 10:12, 17 September 2013 (UTC)

Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Hot Dry Rock (HDR) Geothermal Energy

• Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Hot Dry Rock (HDR) Geothermal Energy · ( logs | links | watch ) · [revisions]

Duchane (talk) 22:48, 16 September 2013 (UTC)

Done - as an Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13, the page has been restored on request. Please edit the page to address the issues raised when it was declined, and re-submit it; "Articles for creation" is not for the indefinite hosting of material found to be unsuitable for inclusion in the encyclopedia.. A glitch in the coding (references need to be closed with "</ref>" not "<ref>") meant that only the first sentence was visible; that is probably why the submission was declined. I have sorted that out; suggest you check it over and re-submit. JohnCD (talk) 10:33, 17 September 2013 (UTC)

Bardel Entertainment

• Bardel Entertainment · ( talk | logs | history | links | watch ) · [revisions]

This page was first deleted through WP:PROD and subsequently through WP:CSD. I would like all of the revisions of this page (that is, from all three deletions) to be restored. I attempted to discuss this with the deleting administrator of the most recent revision, but the administrator in question simply ignored my request to explain the refusal to restore. Note that I am willing to edit the article to address the concerns brought up, but I would like as much material to work with as possible. -Dogmaticeclectic (talk) 07:34, 17 September 2013 (UTC)

 Done, partly. I have omitted a number of revisions from the second creation which were copyright violations from the company's website http://www.bardel.ca/company. I made a fearful hash of the partial restore (not enough coffee) but have finally got it right. As this title was salted by Bbb23 (talk), I have userfied it for you to User:Dogmaticeclectic/Bardel Entertainment. I restored the protection on the original title, and you should check with Bbb23 for permission to post your new version. JohnCD (talk) 11:10, 17 September 2013 (UTC)

There is absolutely no reasonable justification whatsoever for the create protection, and I would therefore ask that you remove it immediately. Dogmaticeclectic (talk) 11:40, 17 September 2013 (UTC)

No, I will not overturn Bbb23's protection. Show him your draft and ask him. Failing that, you know the way to DRV. JohnCD (talk) 21:11, 17 September 2013 (UTC)

WATG Designing Destinations - Wimberly Allison Tong & Goo

• PageName · ( talk | logs | links | watch ) · [revisions]

reasoning -Andreawestrich (talk) 21:12, 17 September 2013 (UTC)

• Not done Since you provided no reason I have not restored it. But instead there is already an article that you can edit at George J. Wimberly that covers this topic. Graeme Bartlett (talk) 10:25, 18 September 2013 (UTC)

Triopoly (board game)

• PageName · ( talk | logs | links | watch ) · [revisions]

reasoning -72.67.21.191 (talk) 01:12, 18 September 2013 (UTC) There is no reason I can see to have deleted such page. Things do not need to be very notable to be mentioned here, and I can find plenty of third-party sources by googling the name. Being down on the list of Amazon sales is no reason to delete its Wiki page.

• Done - as a contested proposed deletion, the article has been restored on request. Graeme Bartlett (talk) 10:31, 18 September 2013 (UTC)

Meriton Group

• PageName · ( talk | logs | links | watch ) · [revisions]

reasoning -Mikihendler (talk) 02:41, 18 September 2013 (UTC)

Meriton Group

I would like to get access to my initial information i wrote just for personal use.

• Not done as this was an advertisement. If you want a copy please contact me by wikipedia email Special:EmailUser/Graeme_Bartlett and I will return you a copy. Graeme Bartlett (talk) 10:06, 18 September 2013 (UTC)

Michele Wallace Campanelli

Michele Wallace Campanelli is an American writer. Her works include: Hero of Her Heart, Margarita, Keeper of the Shroud, Black Widow, Bigfoot Monster of the Ice. She has been published multiple times by Whiskey Creek Press and Chicken Soup for the Soul series.

Michele Wallace Campanelli is an American writer. Her works include: Hero of Her Heart, Margarita, Keeper of the Shroud, Black Widow, Bigfoot Monster of the Ice. She has been published multiple times by Whiskey Creek Press and Chicken Soup for the Soul series. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 97.102.67.167 (talk) 03:35, 18 September 2013 (UTC)

• For this we will need to have a proper deletion review. In my opinion A7 does not apply, however the references do not prove anything. What we need are the actual newspaper pages and magazine articles about the person, not repetitions of things that they did not totally write. If you are in fact Michele Wallace Campanelli be aware it is best to let someone else write about you. Graeme Bartlett (talk) 10:18, 18 September 2013 (UTC)

M.O.R.A. - more of radical architecture

• M.O.R.A. - more of radical architecture · ( talk | logs | links | watch ) · [revisions]

relevant because it is a project by Christian Borngräber, producer and composer, collaborations with Conrad Schnitzler, Ernstalbrecht Stiebler and Ulrich Hornberg, producer and publisher of artists like Ofra Haza, Howard Jones, Richard Strange etc. -93.219.12.26 (talk) 11:02, 18 September 2013 (UTC)

User:Mervyn52/sandbox

• User:Mervyn52/sandbox · ( talk | logs | links | watch ) · [revisions]

I, Mervyn52, request the undeletion of this Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please userfy or restore as appropriate. Mervyn52 (talk) 15:45, 18 September 2013 (UTC)

• Done - as an Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13, the page has been restored on request. Please edit the page to address the issues raised when it was declined, and re-submit it; "Articles for creation" is not for the indefinite hosting of material found to be unsuitable for inclusion in the encyclopedia. Graeme Bartlett (talk) 21:29, 18 September 2013 (UTC)

irish haggis

• PageName · ( talk | logs | links | watch ) · [revisions]

reasoning -Mervyn52 (talk) 15:46, 18 September 2013 (UTC)

• Not done - a deleted page with this name does not appear to exist. you have been editing Wild haggis but never an article called Irish haggis. Graeme Bartlett (talk) 21:37, 18 September 2013 (UTC)

Bruce Replogle

• Bruce Replogle · ( talk | logs | links | watch | afd ) · [revisions]

I, 108.29.153.135, request the undeletion of this Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please userfy or restore as appropriate. 108.29.153.135 (talk) 01:13, 19 September 2013 (UTC)

• Done - as a contested proposed deletion, the article has been restored on request. Graeme Bartlett (talk) 08:57, 19 September 2013 (UTC)

Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Yukio Utada

• Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Yukio Utada · ( logs | links | watch ) · [revisions]

I, Esm0070, request the undeletion of this Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please userfy or restore as appropriate. Esm0070 (talk) 01:53, 19 September 2013 (UTC)

• Done - as an Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13, the page has been restored on request. Please edit the page to address the issues raised when it was declined, and re-submit it; "Articles for creation" is not for the indefinite hosting of material found to be unsuitable for inclusion in the encyclopedia. Graeme Bartlett (talk) 08:49, 19 September 2013 (UTC)

Yukio Utada

• Yukio Utada · ( talk | logs | links | watch ) · [revisions]

This article was originally declined because of a claim that the sources were not verified, yet Yukio Utada is indeed a well known aikido instructor with rank given by the Yoshinkan style, which any simple google search could verify. I would like to figure out precisely what more needs to be done to the article to make sure it satisfies Wikipedia standards -Esm0070 (talk) 01:58, 19 September 2013 (UTC)

• If you can come up with two independent reliable substantial references I will consider undeleting. YouTube is not reliable and the association founded by the person is not independent, so let me know if there are such sources. Graeme Bartlett (talk) 08:52, 19 September 2013 (UTC)

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Municipalities_of_Bangladesh

• Municipalities of Bangladesh · ( talk | logs | history | links | watch ) · [revisions]

a very important national info wiki talking elaborately on Municipalities of Bangladesh, vital info about the top municipilities (pouroshovas) are not accessible thru this wiki.. KINDLY URGENTLY BRING THE BACKUP. -3gneoz (talk) 10:34, 19 September 2013 (UTC)

• Not done - a deleted page with this name does not appear to exist. But you can start such an article if you wish. There is an existing category at Category:Municipalities of Bangladesh, but there does not seem to be many entries there yet. I read there are 310 of them. Graeme Bartlett (talk) 10:56, 19 September 2013 (UTC)

Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Khopadi

• Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Khopadi · ( logs | history | links | watch ) · [revisions]

I, Mahesh darade1, request the undeletion of this Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please userfy or restore as appropriate. Mahesh darade1 (talk) 12:26, 19 September 2013 (UTC)

Done - as an Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13, the page has been restored on request. Please edit the page to address the issues raised when it was declined, and re-submit it; "Articles for creation" is not for the indefinite hosting of material found to be unsuitable for inclusion in the encyclopedia.. What this needs is references to confirm what it says. Check out the Wikipedia:Verifiability policy: "any material challenged or likely to be challenged must be attributed to a reliable, published source." JohnCD (talk) 17:50, 19 September 2013 (UTC)

Scott Cullather

• Scott Cullather · ( talk | logs | links | watch | afd ) · [revisions]

reasoning -Baratta0810 (talk) 19:06, 19 September 2013 (UTC) I, Baratta0810, request the undeletion of this article deleted under CSD G4. I don't have access to the original article, so I am unsure of its contents and my version would have to be substantially different. My article followed the guidelines for reliable sources and was not unambiguously promotional like the previous version. Please userfy or restore as appropriate.

• (Non-administrator comment) User has also recreated InVNT, which I just marked for G4. The previous creator (not sure if this is the same person with a different account) admitted at one point to being a PR rep. §FreeRangeFrog^croak 19:26, 19 September 2013 (UTC)

 Not done per WP:CSD#G5. This user also admits being a hired contractor "posting articles according to someone else's instructions" and in view of the subjects chosen this is clearly yet another of the banned Morning277 large-scale spamming group. JohnCD (talk) 21:31, 19 September 2013 (UTC)

Jessica Northey

• Jessica Northey · ( talk | logs | links | watch | afd | afd2 ) · [revisions]

This article was originally deleted because an editor said it didn't fit the guidelines for inclusion on Wikipedia. It was re-created adding multiple national citations and substantiation for why it should be included - and its conformity with Wiki rules for inclusion. Several national magazines and publications authenticated the content and were cited in the re-created article. This person is a significant figure in the emerging digital media and social media genre. All citations were national in scope. I respectfully ask that it be re-instated -SweetSocial (talk) 04:05, 20 September 2013 (UTC)

• Not done - this Requests for Undeletion process is only for articles that were deleted uncontroversially, and does not apply to articles deleted after a deletion discussion. Since the article you are here about was deleted after a discussion took place at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Jessica Northey, it cannot be undeleted through this process. However, if you believe that the outcome of the discussion did not reflect the consensus of the participants, or that significant new information has come to light since the article was deleted, you may contact the administrator who closed the discussion, user J04n (talk · contribs). After you do so, if your concerns are not addressed and you still seek undeletion, a request may be made at deletion review.

Church on the Living Edge

• Church on the Living Edge · ( talk | logs | links | watch ) · [revisions]

I was creating this page with consent of the church administrator, I was in the process of creating the page when it had gotten deleted for a reason that was not necessary. I would like to have it un-deleted or limited to access by only me until I complete it. PLease help me and i will make sure the page is done under the Wikipedia Guidelines and copyright rules.

Kind Regards, Jkm2900 -Jkm2900 (talk) 22:12, 14 September 2013 (UTC)

Not done I don't know what you mean by "a reason that was not necessary", but the article violated at least two Wikipedia policies, and at least one guideline. Apart from anything else, it was unambiguous promotion from start to finish. Wikipedia is not a medium for any organisations, including churches, to publish pages telling the world how wonderful they are. As for limiting access to one user, that is not possible, and completely contrary to the whole spirit of Wikipedia: anything you write is free to be edited by any other Wikipedia editor. JamesBWatson (talk) 12:16, 20 September 2013 (UTC)

Andrew James Allen

• Andrew James Allen · ( talk | logs | links | watch | afd ) · [revisions]

This is Andrew James Allen and the page that was created on my behalf was totally correct and I was happy with it and would like it to be restored please. Thank you. reasoning -Racer77 (talk) 19:25, 19 September 2013 (UTC)

• Done - as a contested proposed deletion, the article has been restored on request. Graeme Bartlett (talk) 12:00, 20 September 2013 (UTC)