Wikipedia:Requests for undeletion/Archive 102
 | This is an archive of past discussions about Wikipedia:Requests for undeletion. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current main page. |
| Archive 95 | ← | Archive 100 | Archive 101 | Archive 102 | Archive 103 | Archive 104 | Archive 105 |
Rose Schaefer
This page was deleted under the speedy deletion procedures since it was not fully completed. The page did not feature the articles about Rose and did not have enough time for the Jeopardy! fan community to contribute. This page should at least have 1 week for other contributors to add pictures, details, links, and references to the page. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Nvielmette (talk • contribs) 20:42, 19 September 2013 (UTC)
- Did you ask User talk:Anthony Bradbury to reconsider the deletion? Graeme Bartlett (talk) 12:04, 20 September 2013 (UTC)
Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/California Proposition 226 (1998)
- Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/California Proposition 226 (1998) · ( logs | links | watch ) · [revisions]
edit and resubmittal -Forrman67 (talk) 22:22, 19 September 2013 (UTC)
Done - as an Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13, the page has been restored on request. Please edit the page to address the issues raised when it was declined, and re-submit it; "Articles for creation" is not for the indefinite hosting of material found to be unsuitable for inclusion in the encyclopedia. JohnCD (talk) 09:16, 20 September 2013 (UTC)
Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Washington Area Secular Humanists
- Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Washington Area Secular Humanists · ( logs | links | watch ) · [revisions]
I, PhillipCK1, request the undeletion of this Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please userfy or restore as appropriate. PhillipCK1 (talk) 23:36, 19 September 2013 (UTC)
- Done - as an Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13, the page has been restored on request. Please edit the page to address the issues raised when it was declined, and re-submit it; "Articles for creation" is not for the indefinite hosting of material found to be unsuitable for inclusion in the encyclopedia. JohnCD (talk) 09:34, 20 September 2013 (UTC)
Felicks Book
Its the fastest growing most popular website at college campuses. -Felicks1993 (talk) 01:08, 20 September 2013 (UTC)
Not done - this article has not been restored because it does not appear to meet our guidelines for inclusion of articles about websites. In general, Wikipedia considers a topic to be notable if there exist multiple reliable sources of information on the topic, external to the subject itself. Articles concerning companies will be deleted on sight if they are considered to be unambiguous advertising or promotion, or if they do not contain a credible assertion of the significance of the subject. Please read Wikipedia:Conflict of interest and, in regard to "fastest growing", see XKCD. JohnCD (talk) 09:31, 20 September 2013 (UTC)
Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Goliath Technologies
I, Vtmhealy, request the undeletion of this Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please userfy or restore as appropriate. Would like to rewrite for submissionVtmhealy (talk) 02:13, 20 September 2013 (UTC)
- Done - as an Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13, the page has been restored on request. Please edit the page and submit it when ready; "Articles for creation" is not for the indefinite hosting of material found to be unsuitable for inclusion in the encyclopedia. JohnCD (talk) 09:11, 20 September 2013 (UTC)
Karim Vessal
He is a well known person in the field of radiology in Iran and the founding editor of the first medical journal in Iran this article was going to be expanded within few days}}. -HabibzadehParham (talk) 05:07, 20 September 2013 (UTC)
- Userfied - the page has been restored to the userspace at User:HabibzadehParham/Karim Vessal. You may work on improving the article's assertion of notability at its new location, but please contact Bbb23 (talk · contribs), the administrator who deleted the page, before moving it back to the article space. Please see the criteria for speedy deletion and the relevant notability guidelines WP:N, WP:BIO, WP:PROF - articles that are not in compliance will be deleted. JohnCD (talk) 09:57, 20 September 2013 (UTC)
Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Dodmoor House
I, 81.178.135.21, request the undeletion of this Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please userfy or restore as appropriate. 81.178.135.21 (talk) 08:30, 20 September 2013 (UTC)
- Not done. On inspection, this was an advertisement, posted by user Dodmoorhouse (talk). Wikipedia is not for advertising or promotion. JohnCD (talk) 09:44, 20 September 2013 (UTC)
Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Brighton Gay Men's Chorus
- Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Brighton Gay Men's Chorus · ( logs | links | watch ) · [revisions]
46.65.53.252 (talk) 08:33, 20 September 2013 (UTC)
- Not done - this was substantially a copy of the group's website, and so cannot be restored for copyright reasons. It would not be worth making a formal copyright release, because it was also too promotional in tone for an encyclopedia article, which requires a neutral point of view. Read WP:Your first article and make another draft in your own words, making sure you have the references to significant coverage in reliable, independent secondary sources necessary to establish notability. JohnCD (talk) 10:25, 20 September 2013 (UTC)
Luc Vandevelde
<extended text removed> - — Preceding unsigned comment added by ChangeCapital (talk • contribs) 09:55, 20 September 2013
- Not done. This is not the place to write a new article. The previous version will not be restored, because it was a copyright violation from http://www.famousbelgians.net/lucvandevelde.htm. If you wish to write a new article in your own words, you are welcome; advice on your talk page soon. JohnCD (talk) 10:04, 20 September 2013 (UTC)
the house on the lake
reasoning -81.154.184.196 (talk) 11:41, 20 September 2013 (UTC) currently running at the Melbourne fringe festival. A midnight dreary, with Stefan Taylor. An audio preview can be found here.
- This page has not yet been deleted. Please see WP:PROD for the instructions for responding to a proposed deletion. see The house on the lake Graeme Bartlett (talk) 11:53, 20 September 2013 (UTC)
Pingu (series 1)
It was deleted for no apparent reason by GiantSnowman -Visokor (talk) 17:26, 20 September 2013 (UTC)
- Not done. This was deleted by PROD, the reason given being "No references whatsoever. I can't establish notability"; but it cannot be restored because it is a blatant copyright violation from http://www.ovguide.com/tv_season/pingu-season-1-75669#. JohnCD (talk) 19:49, 20 September 2013 (UTC)
Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Folkvang
- Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Folkvang · ( logs | links | watch ) · [revisions]
I, Coldnorthernblood, request the undeletion of this Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please userfy or restore as appropriate. Coldnorthernblood (talk) 22:09, 20 September 2013 (UTC)
- Done - as an Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13, the page has been restored on request. Please edit the page to address the issues raised when it was declined, and re-submit it; "Articles for creation" is not for the indefinite hosting of material found to be unsuitable for inclusion in the encyclopedia. Graeme Bartlett (talk) 22:28, 20 September 2013 (UTC)
File:Earth Girls Are Easy.jpg
It should be added again in Earth Girls Are Easy. -George Ho (talk) 04:58, 21 September 2013 (UTC)
Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Joss-Ink
- Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Joss-Ink · ( logs | links | watch ) · [revisions]
I, 212.183.128.248, request the undeletion of this Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please userfy or restore as appropriate. 212.183.128.248 (talk) 22:54, 20 September 2013 (UTC)
- I think I will leave this deleted. Not much chance of this becoming an article. Graeme Bartlett (talk) 07:12, 21 September 2013 (UTC)
Net4 is Notable company.
Yesterday, I created Net4 page. User:Virgininfatuation has tagged for deletion and suggest "that the article shouldn't be deleted and want more time to work on it, you can contest this deletion", I totally agree. But within 15 minute User:Jimfbleak deleted this page, all this happen within 5 hours. This is a panic action by User:Jimfbleak, which is unfortunate. Net4 is a company, founded in year 1985 and was no. 1 position as ISP, Domain registration and Web hosting many years. Company is still no. 1 in Hosting in India. I think this is not promotion and may need some time to add information about company. -GKCH (talk) 04:28, 21 September 2013 (UTC)
- Done I have overturned the speedy delete, as this was not advertising at all. Graeme Bartlett (talk) 06:42, 21 September 2013 (UTC)
paladi veera bhanu prakash
need people to know about the person paladi veera bhanu prakash -Pvbp2702 (talk) 12:12, 21 September 2013 (UTC)
- Not done - this article has not been restored because it does not appear to meet our guidelines for inclusion of articles about people. In general, Wikipedia considers a topic to be notable if there exist multiple reliable sources of information on the topic, external to the subject itself. Articles concerning people will be deleted on sight if they are considered to be unambiguous advertising or promotion, or if they do not contain a credible assertion of the significance of the subject. However you can create a page about yourself at User:Pvbp2702 Graeme Bartlett (talk) 13:19, 21 September 2013 (UTC)
Asian Peach Day
This article was written and supposedly taken down by the user. I was given an Assignment from my Current School to try and get a copy of this page. If it is possible i could get a copy or have the page undeleted, That would be wonderful. Also, I Am not entirely sure of the title of the page. I may be "Asian Peach Day" or something alongs those lines. Thank You. -68.147.53.102 (talk) 17:26, 21 September 2013 (UTC)
- Not done because I can't find the page in question. Thank you for saying that you weren't sure about the title, because I knew that I should look for alternate names. Unfortunately, I can't find anything that's at all similar, so I will not be able to help you. If you find or remember the page title in the future, please come back and ask again. Nyttend (talk) 18:39, 21 September 2013 (UTC)
lars rüetschi
reasoning -178.194.107.232 (talk) 20:14, 21 September 2013 (UTC) http://www.music-chart.info/Switzerland/archive/genre/2/Blues/2013/08/10#21
(Non-administrator comment)There's a deletion log for Lars Rüetschi, but it indicates there was only a redirect there (I don't know whether it led to anything useful. Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Lars Rüetschi has been restored, but hasn't been approved as an article because better sources are needed. Peter James (talk) 22:04, 21 September 2013 (UTC)
- Not done - a deleted page with this name does not appear to exist. the reason as almost identified by Peter James is that the page was moved to Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Lars Rüetschi. So you can work on improving that page instead. Graeme Bartlett (talk) 22:48, 21 September 2013 (UTC)
Wikipedia:Articles for creation/List of startups in Portland, Oregon page
- Wikipedia:Articles for creation/List of startups in Portland, Oregon page · ( talk | logs | links | watch ) · [revisions]
I, Hobsonlane, request the undeletion of this Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please userfy or restore as appropriate. Hobsonlane (talk) 21:15, 21 September 2013 (UTC)
- Done - as an Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13, the page has been restored on request. Please edit the page to address the issues raised when it was declined, and re-submit it; "Articles for creation" is not for the indefinite hosting of material found to be unsuitable for inclusion in the encyclopedia. see Wikipedia:Articles for creation/List of startups in Portland, Oregon Graeme Bartlett (talk) 05:33, 22 September 2013 (UTC)
Midual
Company still exists, based in the city of Angers (France),official name is RDMO, bike is still in development -88.74.141.162 (talk) 23:08, 21 September 2013 (UTC)
- Done - as a contested proposed deletion, the article has been restored on request. Graeme Bartlett (talk) 05:43, 22 September 2013 (UTC)
Poeta Callejero
They can not erase on article, because I write an article for a singer -Ottonielblanco119 (talk) 15:19, 21 September 2013 (UTC)
- Note that the above user (Ottonielblanco119) has been indefinitely blocked as a sockpuppet of a user (Ottoniel Blanco) who was indefinitely blocked in February 2013 for inappropriate article creation and other violations. Consider his comment above accordingly. — Richwales (no relation to Jimbo) 16:09, 21 September 2013 (UTC)
- Deleted per G5. Creations by banned or blocked users. Dougweller (talk) 16:52, 21 September 2013 (UTC)
- Not done Graeme Bartlett (talk) 11:09, 22 September 2013 (UTC)
- Deleted per G5. Creations by banned or blocked users. Dougweller (talk) 16:52, 21 September 2013 (UTC)
Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Steel Wars, Full Armor Combat competition
- Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Steel Wars, Full Armor Combat competition · ( logs | links | watch ) · [revisions]
Request the undeletion of this Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please userfy or restore as appropriate. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 108.5.233.115 (talk) 23:27, 21 September 2013 (UTC)
- Done - as an Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13, the page has been restored on request. Please edit the page to address the issues raised when it was declined, and re-submit it; "Articles for creation" is not for the indefinite hosting of material found to be unsuitable for inclusion in the encyclopedia. Graeme Bartlett (talk) 05:36, 22 September 2013 (UTC)
- I did not know I had to update the page every six months. I am sorry. -108.5.233.115 (talk) 23:30, 21 September 2013 (UTC)
- Not update every 6 months, but make pogress towards being accepted as an article. Hasteur (talk) 00:24, 23 September 2013 (UTC)
- I did not know I had to update the page every six months. I am sorry. -108.5.233.115 (talk) 23:30, 21 September 2013 (UTC)
Pisi Linux
Accept the need for improvements and ask that the article be undeleted to enable editing. -86.29.131.84 (talk) 19:29, 22 September 2013 (UTC)
Shanye Skov
reasoning -Matabs2000 (talk) 23:08, 21 September 2013 (UTC)
- Not done - this article has not been restored because it does not appear to meet our guidelines for inclusion of articles about people. In general, Wikipedia considers a topic to be notable if there exist multiple reliable sources of information on the topic, external to the subject itself. Articles concerning people will be deleted on sight if they are considered to be unambiguous advertising or promotion, or if they do not contain a credible assertion of the significance of the subject. Actually was in Shanye skov with caps error. Graeme Bartlett (talk) 11:21, 23 September 2013 (UTC)
Vrishanana yogini
reasoning -117.239.184.218 (talk) 13:51, 22 September 2013 (UTC)
- Not done - a deleted page with this name does not appear to exist. nor with caps. Graeme Bartlett (talk) 11:50, 23 September 2013 (UTC)
Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Bay Area Women's and Children's Center
- Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Bay Area Women's and Children's Center · ( logs | links | watch ) · [revisions]
I, 4bawcc, request the undeletion of this Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please userfy or restore as appropriate. 4bawcc (talk) 22:40, 22 September 2013 (UTC)
Comment:Before restoration, please observe that user's name could be construed as a role/COI based accont as "For Bay Area Women's and Children's Center). Hasteur (talk) 00:21, 23 September 2013 (UTC)
- 4bawcc please change your user name as users here have to represent people not organisations. Done - as an Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13, the page has been restored on request. Please edit the page to address the issues raised when it was declined, and re-submit it; "Articles for creation" is not for the indefinite hosting of material found to be unsuitable for inclusion in the encyclopedia. Graeme Bartlett (talk) 10:52, 23 September 2013 (UTC)
- 4bawcc please change your user name as users here have to represent people not organisations.
Bay Area Women's and Children's Center (BAWCC)
I just received updates from the BAWCC for the article. I'm sorry that it has taken so long. Thanks in advance. -4bawcc (talk) 22:46, 22 September 2013 (UTC)
- Comment:Before restoration, please observe that user's name could be construed as a role/COI based accont as "For Bay Area Women's and Children's Center) Hasteur (talk) 00:23, 23 September 2013 (UTC)
- Not done - a deleted page with this name does not appear to exist. Graeme Bartlett (talk) 10:00, 23 September 2013 (UTC)
Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Finite Congruence Lattice Problem
- Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Finite Congruence Lattice Problem · ( logs | links | watch ) · [revisions]
I, 98.25.165.203, request the undeletion of this Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please userfy or restore as appropriate. 98.25.165.203 (talk) 00:02, 23 September 2013 (UTC)
- Done - as an Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13, the page has been restored on request. Please edit the page to address the issues raised when it was declined, and re-submit it; "Articles for creation" is not for the indefinite hosting of material found to be unsuitable for inclusion in the encyclopedia. Graeme Bartlett (talk) 09:58, 23 September 2013 (UTC)
Ventimeglia
{{subst:refund|1= pageName |2=reasoning
The "Ventimeglia" is a customized Starbucks order defined by a very popular Youtube Celebrity. Many viewers like to know and have a place to refer to regarding it's contents, in order to get one of their own at Starbucks. There are no other applicably valid websites that have official documentation for the fans of the celebrity. Please undo the deletion of this article, as it is a notable subject of interest. Information will and can be added to the page upon it's return.
Thank you.
- Not done looks totally non notable to me, I could find no reliable web sites at all. Graeme Bartlett (talk) 10:37, 23 September 2013 (UTC)
The Church and Internet
This is now a redirect. Perhaps recover deleted history logs? -George Ho (talk) 06:29, 23 September 2013 (UTC)
- Not done there was no significant content, you have already typed the entire content of the article in this request. Graeme Bartlett (talk) 10:02, 23 September 2013 (UTC)
Creating Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Concentration (psychology)
- Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Concentration (psychology) · ( logs | links | watch ) · [revisions]
(This user used the preload form for AFC undeletion, but did not specify the name of the AFC draft they would like undeleted. Consider checking their deleted contributions.) Samwass (talk) 10:17, 23 September 2013 (UTC)
- Done - as an Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13, the page has been restored on request. Please edit the page to address the issues raised when it was declined, and re-submit it; "Articles for creation" is not for the indefinite hosting of material found to be unsuitable for inclusion in the encyclopedia. Graeme Bartlett (talk) 10:45, 23 September 2013 (UTC)
Dan Forden
Deleted via WP:PROD due to alleged lack of notability, however, composer has done many scores for videogames, including scores for Mortal Kombat. -—Locke Cole • t • c 10:42, 23 September 2013 (UTC)
- Done - as a contested proposed deletion, the article has been restored on request. Graeme Bartlett (talk) 10:46, 23 September 2013 (UTC)
- Thank you, could you also restore the deleted talk page history? —Locke Cole • t • c 10:59, 23 September 2013 (UTC)
File:Storyofmenstruationtitle.jpg, File:Story of menstruation 2.jpg
See below -TJRC (talk) 20:00, 23 September 2013 (UTC)
See below -TJRC (talk) 20:00, 23 September 2013 (UTC)
These two files were believed to be in the public domain, and were therefore transwikied to Commons and deleted here in 2011. The public domain conclusion was premised on the fact that the film was published pre-1964 and the assertion that its copyright was never renewed. However, in June 2013, an IP editor noted that the copyright had in fact been renewed, and the film was not in the public domain: [1]. Although this edit was unsourced, and I was initially skeptical (in fact, I initially reverted it as unsourced), I have followed up and confirmed that it was renewed; see renewal registration no. R564909, Dec. 3, 1973, recorded in Catalog of copyright entries. Ser.3 pt.12–13 v.24–27 1970–1973 Motion Pictures. U.S. Copyright Office. 1973. p. 118.
Because of the renewal, the film and its screenshots are not public domain, and will need to be deleted from Commons. However, they certainly are allowable as fair use, so I'd like them to be restored here before I move to delete from Commons, to retain their origin and history, as required by the applicable CC or GFDL license and to avoid the article The Story of Menstruation being messed up. TJRC (talk) 20:00, 23 September 2013 (UTC)
- Done both. Pleae update their licensing status on the description-pages. DMacks (talk) 20:26, 23 September 2013 (UTC)
Template:Andy Griffith
Please restore article deleted at this location to my user space -Jax 0677 (talk) 00:03, 22 September 2013 (UTC)
- Userfied - the page has been restored to the userspace at User:Jax 0677/Template:Andy Griffith. King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 00:25, 25 September 2013 (UTC)
plate heat exchanger
reasoning -59.95.14.32 (talk) 12:23, 23 September 2013 (UTC)
- Not done Article has not been deleted (though this IP had blanked its content and it was promptly restored by another editor). DMacks (talk) 13:53, 24 September 2013 (UTC)
Maarouf Mawloud
it is really not logical why the page is deleting many times since that guy has the opportunity to have his name on wikipedia cause he is the younger journalist in fiba world cup and he is one of the famous young journalist in lebanon add on he is a technical staff in First basketball division team and i provided you with references so it is not logical a page for a famous journalist has been deleted -Lebanonsports (talk) 16:50, 23 September 2013 (UTC)
- Not done - this article has not been restored because it does not appear to meet our guidelines for inclusion of articles about people. In general, Wikipedia considers a topic to be notable if there exist multiple reliable sources of information on the topic, external to the subject itself. Articles concerning people will be deleted on sight if they are considered to be unambiguous advertising or promotion, or if they do not contain a credible assertion of the significance of the subject. DMacks (talk) 13:56, 24 September 2013 (UTC)
Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Janna McMahan
- Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Janna McMahan · ( logs | history | links | watch ) · [revisions]
I, Dbloom803, request the undeletion of this Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please userfy or restore as appropriate. Dbloom803 (talk) 19:35, 23 September 2013 (UTC)
- Userfied - the page has been restored to the userspace at user:Dbloom803/Janna McMahan. DMacks (talk) 14:01, 24 September 2013 (UTC)
Ivan Telegin
Please restore edit history of this recently recreated article. -Dolovis (talk) 17:43, 24 September 2013 (UTC)
- Done King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 00:28, 25 September 2013 (UTC)
Orange County Waves (WPSL)
I came to start this article then saw it was deleted under G7 in January 2012. I wasn't the original author but I want to make it again (it meets all relevant notability guidelines etc.) Please could it be restored or sent to my userspace for me to improve it first? Thank you in advance. Clavdia chauchat (talk) 20:27, 24 September 2013 (UTC) -Clavdia chauchat (talk) 20:27, 24 September 2013 (UTC)
- Hi Clavdia. I have userfied the article to User:Clavdia chauchat/Orange County Waves and made some tweaks. Remember to remove the nowiki tags around the categories I added before you move the page to the mainspace. Also, note that the title should not have "(WPSL)" in it. Best regards--Fuhghettaboutit (talk) 00:23, 25 September 2013 (UTC)
Modelo causal de Rubin
Es una traducción al español de la página Rubin causal model -LKs (talk) 21:24, 24 September 2013 (UTC)
- Not done This is the English Wikipedia. If you want to translate this article into Spanish, that belongs at the Spanish Wikipedia, which is a separate website. Also note that you must provide copyright attribution to the source of your translation. The way to do this (at the Spanish Wikipedia, which I linked) is to provide in the edit summary a note such as "Translating article from the English Wikipedia at [[:en:Rubin causal model]]". I will place a machine translation of this message below. Best regards--Fuhghettaboutit (talk) 00:52, 25 September 2013 (UTC)
- No realizado. Esta es la Wikipedia en Inglés. Si quieres traducir este artículo en español, que pertenece a la Wikipedia Español, es un sitio web independiente que. También tenga en cuenta que debe proporcionar la atribución de derechos de autor a la fuente de su traducción. La manera de hacer esto (en la Wikipedia española, que he vinculado) es proporcionar en el edit summary una nota como "artículo Traducir de la Wikipedia en Inglés [[:en:Rubin causal model]]". Saludos--Fuhghettaboutit (talk) 00:52, 25 September 2013 (UTC)
- I have created the page for you at https://es.wikipedia.org/wiki/Modelo_causal_de_Rubin Graeme Bartlett (talk) 05:51, 25 September 2013 (UTC)
- No realizado. Esta es la Wikipedia en Inglés. Si quieres traducir este artículo en español, que pertenece a la Wikipedia Español, es un sitio web independiente que. También tenga en cuenta que debe proporcionar la atribución de derechos de autor a la fuente de su traducción. La manera de hacer esto (en la Wikipedia española, que he vinculado) es proporcionar en el edit summary una nota como "artículo Traducir de la Wikipedia en Inglés [[:en:Rubin causal model]]". Saludos--Fuhghettaboutit (talk) 00:52, 25 September 2013 (UTC)
Template:Db-g13/sandbox
Was erroneously deleted as CSD:G7 which was never requested. -Technical 13 (talk) 22:53, 24 September 2013 (UTC)
- Done King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 00:34, 25 September 2013 (UTC)
Template:Db-g13/testcases
Was erroneously deleted as CSD:G7 which was never requested. -Technical 13 (talk) 22:53, 24 September 2013 (UTC)
- Done King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 00:34, 25 September 2013 (UTC)
File:1920 census Bolton.jpg
image was deleted but is used as a reference in an article, deleter only looked to see if image was displayed and did not check if it was used as a reference -Richard Arthur Norton (1958- ) (talk) 00:08, 25 September 2013 (UTC)
-2013-09-25T00:08:00.000Z-File:1920_census_Bolton.jpg){kind=link}
Enso Care
I could edit the article created to make it more Encyclopedia - befitting which may have come across as promotion as written previously. The reason given was that it was written in an improper manner. Would request you to evaluate the content first and see if it is befitting Wikipedia's criteria for importance -India2685 (talk) 01:18, 25 September 2013 (UTC)
- Not done Much too promotional to have back, but you can add neutral content to Enso Group. I have converted this to a redirect. Graeme Bartlett (talk) 05:58, 25 September 2013 (UTC)
Request for undeletion (NAI LAC)
I wish thosew who know zero about an author would mind their own business. "Overland to the Islands" is a volume of poetry by Denise Levertov, and is properly listed under Primary Works, which is what it is.
Have the courtesy -- the good sense -- to communicate with those who know what htey're doing befor acting precipitously as if a know-it-all. In short: mind your own business.
JNagarya — Preceding unsigned comment added by JNagarya (talk • contribs) 09:21, 30 September 2013 (UTC)
zarsoo enterprises
reasoning There is nothing promotional or advertisement in the content. Last content seem promotional, no problem but doesn't seem now!-Surajx4u1 (talk) 19:56, 21 September 2013 (UTC)
- Fixed formatting --Mdann52talk to me! 18:23, 28 September 2013 (UTC)
Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/YPA Streetball
I, 24.4.209.239, request the undeletion of this Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please userfy or restore as appropriate. 24.4.209.239 (talk) 23:38, 24 September 2013 (UTC)
- Done - as an Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13, the page has been restored on request. Please edit the page to address the issues raised when it was declined, and re-submit it; "Articles for creation" is not for the indefinite hosting of material found to be unsuitable for inclusion in the encyclopedia. JohnCD (talk) 13:20, 25 September 2013 (UTC)
Andy LoCascio
Subject is in fact notable and entire article is factual. Additional citations could easily be added. Subject is the host and founder of one of longest running fishing TV shows in the USA (neangling.com). Subject is the founder of Sound Strategies (soundst.com) creators of the new scotusblog.com domain which is the first web site to receive a Peabody Award and a leading development and SEO firm in NY. No reply was recieved from user Legoktm regasrdnig this deletion. -Locascioa (talk) 23:51, 24 September 2013 (UTC)
- Done - as a contested proposed deletion, the article has been restored on request. I will notify user Trivialist (talk), who proposed it, and who may choose to nominate it at WP:Articles for deletion, which would start a debate lasting seven days, to which you would be welcome to contribute; but before doing so, please read the Wikipedia:Plain and simple conflict of interest guide. JohnCD (talk) 13:27, 25 September 2013 (UTC)
Vaibhav Maloo
Circumstances evolving around him have changed and he has been in constant limelight and is second in command ( Managing Director, as of 2013 )of a USD 7 billion group. He is chairman of the largest PPP in healthcare in India and is an alumnus of Oxford, Carnegie Mellon and Cambridge. He is the legal heir to this gigantic empire and is more noteworthy than Vanisha Mittal, Siddharth Mallya and Reddy who have been given space on this credible, reliable and complete website, that is, Wikipedia. He has had over 200 press releases in this year alone and has over 50000 twitter followers and 2000 likes on his fan page on facebook. because we tried to create his page several times and there may have been incidents of sabotage, his page has been blocked for creation, please advise whether he fits wikipedia's criteria for undeletion and whether I should bother creating a page for him -India2685 (talk) 01:22, 25 September 2013 (UTC)
- Comment: Normally in cases like this, you create a draft, that is sourced, etc. You then approach the last deleting admin - or the admin who protected it and see if it's now acceptable ES&L 10:01, 25 September 2013 (UTC)
Ramin Cabbarli
reasoning -Ram5ninc (talk) 09:46, 25 September 2013 (UTC)
- Not done - this page was deleted in accordance with criterion for speedy deletion A7. If you believe that this decision was made in error, or that significant new information has come to light since the deletion, please contact the administrator who carried out the deletion, user Peridon (talk · contribs). If you have already done so, your concerns can be taken to deletion review.--Fuhghettaboutit (talk) 12:20, 25 September 2013 (UTC)
RaminDreamerWorks
reasoning -Ram5ninc (talk) 09:47, 25 September 2013 (UTC)
- Not done - this page was deleted in accordance with criterion for speedy deletion A7 (and at other times under WP:CSD#G11 and others. If you believe that this decision was made in error, or that significant new information has come to light since the deletion, please contact the administrator who carried out the deletion. If you have already done so, your concerns can be taken to deletion review.--Fuhghettaboutit (talk) 12:21, 25 September 2013 (UTC)
Michael Kemp
- Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Michael Kemp · ( logs | links | watch ) · [revisions]
I, Kysa Kemp, request the undeletion of this Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please userfy or restore as appropriate. Michael has since published several choral magazine articles, conducted choral workshops and has two more books soon to be published in the field of amateur choirs, the aging voice and motivating choral directors. -Kysa Kemp (talk) 00:41, 26 September 2013 (UTC)
- Done - as an Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13, the page has been restored on request. Please edit the page to address the issues raised when it was declined, and re-submit it; "Articles for creation" is not for the indefinite hosting of material found to be unsuitable for inclusion in the encyclopedia.. JohnCD (talk) 10:22, 26 September 2013 (UTC)
Nina Rosenwald
article was deleted after a stale PROD. I've improved it and believe NR is notable. Let's at least go through AfD. -72.66.30.115 (talk) 00:46, 26 September 2013 (UTC)
Please ignore this request. I submitted my refurbished article through the article creation process and thought it would take longer to be approved. --72.66.30.115 (talk) 00:50, 26 September 2013 (UTC)
- Comment:: Good. I have restored the history of the deleted version so that its authors get credit for their contributions. JohnCD (talk) 10:27, 26 September 2013 (UTC)
- Thank you for doing that, JohnCD; I appreciate it. The edit history is important, for the reason you cite. --72.66.30.115 (talk) 22:11, 26 September 2013 (UTC)
Vickiel Vaughn
everything written in the article was cited and accurate -68.51.48.146 (talk) 06:42, 26 September 2013 (UTC)
- Done - as a contested proposed deletion, the article has been restored on request. However, be warned: it appears that you are trying to use this page to attack the subject. The fact that something can be referenced does not necessarily mean that it should be included in an encyclopedia article. The information you want to insert has now been removed three times by other editors. If there is a dispute over content, it must be settled by discussion on the article talk page - read WP:BOLD, revert, discuss cycle. If you insert this information again, without having obtained a WP:Consensus to do so by discussion on the talk page, you may be blocked for edit-warring. JohnCD (talk) 21:31, 26 September 2013 (UTC)
Visitors and residents
"no evidence that it meets the notability criteria for neologisms". However, I would like to see this information on a page, as I believe it is useful for discussions of Internet use. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 188.76.76.103 (talk) 06:51, 26 September 2013 (UTC)
- Done - as a contested proposed deletion, the article has been restored on request. I will notify user RHaworth (talk), who proposed it, and who may choose to nominate it at WP:Articles for deletion, which would start a debate lasting seven days, to which you would be welcome to contribute. Check out WP:NEO. JohnCD (talk) 11:27, 27 September 2013 (UTC)
Gligor Paul
reasoning -Paul4you27 (talk) 08:17, 26 September 2013 (UTC)
- Not done - this article has not been restored because it does not appear to meet our guidelines for inclusion of articles about people. In general, Wikipedia considers a topic to be notable if there exist multiple reliable sources of information on the topic, external to the subject itself. Articles concerning people will be deleted on sight if they are considered to be unambiguous advertising or promotion, or if they do not contain a credible assertion of the significance of the subject.
- Wikipedia is not a place for people to write about themselves; also, you should read Wikipedia:Guidance for younger editors. JohnCD (talk) 11:34, 27 September 2013 (UTC)
Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Guy Saville
- Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Guy Saville · ( logs | links | watch ) · [revisions]
I, 86.142.58.206, request the undeletion of this Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please userfy or restore as appropriate. 86.142.58.206 (talk) 12:47, 26 September 2013 (UTC)
- Done - as an Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13, the page has been restored on request. Please edit the page to address the issues raised when it was declined, and re-submit it; "Articles for creation" is not for the indefinite hosting of material found to be unsuitable for inclusion in the encyclopedia. JohnCD (talk) 21:15, 26 September 2013 (UTC)
ECE ROCKERSSSSS
BEthanesh — Preceding unsigned comment added by Bethanesh (talk • contribs) 12:58, 26 September 2013 (UTC)
- Not done. Sorry, but restoring this would be a waste of your time and ours. You wrote: "Hi Viewers .... This gonna to be alumini site", and it just contained a list of the students in your class; but Wikipedia is not a web-host for that kind of thing. You want a social-networing site - try Myspace or Facebook. JohnCD (talk) 21:10, 26 September 2013 (UTC)
Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Nemesis
I, 79.40.53.5, request the undeletion of this Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please userfy or restore as appropriate.
Dear Admin,
the above mentioned page has been deleted because I didn't edit it for 180 days.
I would very much like to edit and finalize the page and then submit it. It would be great if you could undelete the page. Thanks! Lilly333 — Preceding unsigned comment added by 79.40.53.5 (talk) 17:11, 26 September 2013 (UTC) 79.40.53.5 (talk) 17:08, 26 September 2013 (UTC)
- Done - as an Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13, the page has been restored on request. Please edit the page and submit it as soon as convenient; "Articles for creation" is not for the indefinite hosting of material. JohnCD (talk) 22:05, 26 September 2013 (UTC)
Feathercoin
Consensus unmet -WSF (talk) 17:13, 26 September 2013 (UTC)
It is believed many people who contributed to this article were either unaware of the deletion process or unable to participate. It is suggested to restore the article for a further debate and improvement. Otherwise please move it to my user space as I'm the original author. WSF (talk) 17:13, 26 September 2013 (UTC)
- Not done - as this was deleted after the deletion discussion at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Feathercoin, it will not be restored here. You should approach the administrator who closed the discussion, user Mark Arsten (talk), and ask him to userfy the page for you; failing that, you may apply at WP:Deletion review. JohnCD (talk) 22:14, 26 September 2013 (UTC)
Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/David Lee Ziegler, Ph.D.
- Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/David Lee Ziegler, Ph.D. · ( logs | links | watch ) · [revisions]
I, SpesCuratio, request the undeletion of this Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please userfy or restore as appropriate. SpesCuratio (talk) 17:57, 26 September 2013 (UTC)
- Done - as an Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13, the page has been restored on request. Please edit the page to address the issues raised when it was declined, and re-submit it; "Articles for creation" is not for the indefinite hosting of material found to be unsuitable for inclusion in the encyclopedia. JohnCD (talk) 08:45, 27 September 2013 (UTC)
Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/David Rankin (1925-1910), America's "Corn King"
- Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/David Rankin (1925-1910), America's "Corn King" · ( logs | links | watch ) · [revisions]
Have been busy but would like to edit the page to bring it into Wiki conformance. We have citations for all things questioned by the editor. Have citations questioned by editor. Just busy with work. Would like to resubmit for consideration. Please restore. 128.29.43.1 (talk) 19:10, 26 September 2013 (UTC)
- Done - as an Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13, the page has been restored on request. Please edit the page to address the issues raised when it was declined, and re-submit it; "Articles for creation" is not for the indefinite hosting of material found to be unsuitable for inclusion in the encyclopedia. JohnCD (talk) 08:49, 27 September 2013 (UTC)
Greater_Talent_Network
Greater Talent Network is a world-leading speakers bureau company based in New York City and has been such since it's foundation in 1982. There have been several articles created (several more which are not on the internet as they were written prior to articles being stored on the internet) and I can take pictures of these and provide them for proof. We are not advertising. we would like to simply continue to broaden our digital footprint by educating others on our company. There are other companies just like Greater Talent network with active wikipedia pages. Please pin-point exactly where it is unambiguously advertising or promoting our site, where there is no direct online source provided so this can be fixed and placed back up on wikipedia. We apparently been having this problem since 2005 and would like it resolved. Thank you, Lauren Digital Marketing Project Manager of Greater Talent Network, Inc. -LaurenLaFranca (talk) 00:16, 27 September 2013 (UTC)
- Not done. The reason you are having this problem, and the reason articles about GTN have now been deleted seven times, is that although you say "We are not advertising", you are in fact trying to use Wikipedia to promote your company, and that is not what an encyclopedia is for. You are paid to tell the story the company wants to tell the world about itself, but Wikipedia is extremely resistant to being used in that way.
- If you really cannot see that "world-leading... a perennial leader... the world’s most dynamic speakers... One of the world's premier speakers bureaus... the most interesting and inspiring stories... " is promotional PR-speak, then you are too close to your subject to be able to write about it from the neutral point of view that Wikipedia requires. This sort of thing is the reason why Wikipedia strongly discourages editing by anyone with a WP:Conflict of interest such as your position gives you.
- We would prefer that you wait until someone not connected with or paid by the company thinks it interesting enough to write about, but if you want to proceed you should start by reading the Wikipedia:Plain and simple conflict of interest guide and then start with a clean sheet and write a draft article in your user space for an uninvolved editor to check. I will give advice on your user talk page in a day or so. JohnCD (talk) 11:03, 27 September 2013 (UTC)
Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Second CRM
- Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Second CRM · ( logs | links | watch ) · [revisions]
I, Aisyah07, request the undeletion of this Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please userfy or restore as appropriate. Second CRM 06:46, 27 September 2013 (UTC) — Preceding unsigned comment added by Aisyah07 (talk • contribs) 06:46, 27 September 2013
- Comment:: this has not yet been deleted, and if you now make any edit that will prevent immediate deletion; but as soon as convenient you should edit the page to address the issues raised when it was declined, and re-submit it; "Articles for creation" is not for the indefinite hosting of material found to be unsuitable for inclusion in the encyclopedia. JohnCD (talk) 11:16, 27 September 2013 (UTC)
Harsha Chemudu
It was deleted as the admin felt it not so important but the thing is i have created an article about Harsha Chemudu who has got around 10000 likes on fb and is very famous from his Short Film "The Viva" Which has got more than 3 million views on youtube and which was popular in youtube India for 2 Weeks -Eshwarsachin (talk) 08:16, 27 September 2013 (UTC) A small correction , Harsha Chemudu is film actor his page that eshwarasachin mentioned has over 50000 followers and he has been interviewed by many telugu channels including TV9.
Cathy Pill
reasoning -Joannalieber (talk) 13:35, 27 September 2013 (UTC)
Dear Deb,
This is Joanna Lieber
I was going to add sources to the Article but you deleted it,
Please let me further work on the article
Thank you
Joanna Lieber
- Comment:: I see that you have re-created it, but note the deletion log for your first version: it was deleted not for lack of references (you would have been given ten days to fix that) but as a blatant advertisement requiring speedy deletion. I have removed the single most promotional paragraph from your new version, but if it is to be kept it still needs work to make it less like a press release in tone: beware of "peacock terms" like "prestigious" and "inspirational", and be aware of Wikipedia's policies WP:Neutral point of view and WP:Verifiability. JohnCD (talk) 20:13, 27 September 2013 (UTC)
Wikipedia_talk:Articles_for_creation/Maggie_Flanigan
unfinished -Ambeddo10 (talk) 15:29, 27 September 2013 (UTC)
- Question: Any particular reason you abandoned the unfinished work for over 2 years, waited over 30 days after being notified that your work was in danger of deletion, let the page be deleted, and now you are petitioning to continue work? Hasteur (talk) 17:07, 27 September 2013 (UTC)
Kylie Rae Harris
This article was deleted because of the alleged insignificance of this particular musical artist, but that is false. Kylie Rae Harris is featured in a nationally syndicated television show: Troubadour, TX, and is referenced frequently in that Wiki article. Kylie's latest release was also featured on the front page of Itunes, which is far from "insignificance". -Sgrod91 (talk) 19:30, 27 September 2013 (UTC)
- (Non-administrator comment) Not done - this page was deleted in accordance with criterion for speedy deletion A7. If you believe that this decision was made in error, or that significant new information has come to light since the deletion, please contact the administrator who carried out the deletion, user GB fan (talk · contribs). If you have already done so, your concerns can be taken to deletion review.
Daniel Pappoe
Player has played in a fully professional game for his club and now meets the criteria to have an article. -TheBigJagielka (talk) 20:45, 27 September 2013 (UTC)
- (Non-administrator comment) Not done - this Requests for Undeletion process is only for articles that were deleted uncontroversially, and does not apply to articles deleted after a deletion discussion. Since the article you are here about was deleted after a discussion took place at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Daniel Pappoe (2nd nomination), it cannot be undeleted through this process. However, if you believe that the outcome of the discussion did not reflect the consensus of the participants, or that significant new information has come to light since the article was deleted, you may contact the administrator who closed the discussion, user postdlf (talk · contribs). After you do so, if your concerns are not addressed and you still seek undeletion, a request may be made at deletion review. --Mdann52talk to me! 18:20, 28 September 2013 (UTC)
Minto pyramid principle
I am a business student and wanted to get some information about Minto pyramid principle, but this page does't exited on wikipedia. After checking furthur, I came to know that this page was deleted due to notability causes. Please restore it, since it is a notable subject.Editlets (talk) 12:46, 28 September 2013 (UTC)
.:*
Done Graeme Bartlett (talk) 19:56, 28 September 2013 (UTC)
Suiside Inferno
New hip hop and rap artist bio was deleted and is a well know person -Suiside Inferno 01:04, 29 September 2013 (UTC)
- Not done - this article has not been restored because it does not appear to meet our guidelines for inclusion of articles about music. In general, Wikipedia considers a topic to be notable if there exist multiple reliable sources of information on the topic, external to the subject itself. Articles concerning musicians or music groups will be deleted on sight if they are considered to be unambiguous advertising or promotion, or if they do not contain a credible assertion of the significance of the subject.
- This particular subject does not appear to meet any of the inclusion criteria specified in WP:MUSICBIO. The discography appears to be self-published and the article contained no references, just links to facebook pages. ~Amatulić (talk) 12:42, 29 September 2013 (UTC)
Wikipedia_talk:Articles_for_creation/Joss-Ink
- Wikipedia_talk:Articles_for_creation/Joss-Ink · ( logs | links | watch ) · [revisions]
I, 212.183.128.133, request the undeletion of this Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please userfy or restore as appropriate. 212.183.128.133 (talk) 02:22, 29 September 2013 (UTC)
- Done. Please continue to improve the submission, otherwise it will be deleted again. ~Amatulić (talk) 12:44, 29 September 2013 (UTC)
Mythological objects in Hindu mythology
Matthew Thompson talk to me bro! expressed it is useful article -శ్రీధర్ బాబు (talk) 05:08, 29 September 2013 (UTC)
- Done. Looks to me like it was tagged for WP:CSD#G7 only after you tried to restore if after blanking. ~Amatulić (talk) 12:27, 29 September 2013 (UTC)
Estonian tatars
Estonian Tatars · ( talk | logs | links | watch ) · [revisions]
This article is totally related to demographics of a particular community in Estonia. It does't violate any Wikipedia policies. The only reason for its deletion was that it was created by a sock of some blocked editor. Please restore this article since there is no statement related to vandalism in it. Its totally demographic entity.Olifins (talk) 11:10, 29 September 2013 (UTC) -Olifins (talk) 11:10, 29 September 2013 (UTC)
- Not done. We have WP:CSD#G5 for a reason. Creation by a sockpuppet is a violation of policy. Furthermore, the article was very short, citing only one reference. ~Amatulić (talk) 12:22, 29 September 2013 (UTC)
Zoran Stratev
managing national team -Jolicnikola (talk) 11:27, 29 September 2013 (UTC)
- Done - as a contested proposed deletion, the article has been restored on request. I will notify user Sir Sputnik (talk), who proposed it, and who may choose to nominate it at WP:Articles for deletion, which would start a debate lasting seven days, to which you would be welcome to contribute. Please update the article with a reference to show why he is notable; his Soccerway profile linked from the article does not show any employment after 2011. JohnCD (talk) 20:10, 29 September 2013 (UTC)
Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/T.V. John Langworthy
I, 188.29.6.12, request the undeletion of this Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please userfy or restore as appropriate. 188.29.6.12 (talk) 14:51, 29 September 2013 (UTC)
- Done - as an Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13, the page has been restored on request. Please edit the page to address the issues raised when it was declined, and re-submit it; "Articles for creation" is not for the indefinite hosting of material found to be unsuitable for inclusion in the encyclopedia. JohnCD (talk) 19:59, 29 September 2013 (UTC)