Wikipedia:Requests for undeletion/Archive 104
 | This is an archive of past discussions on Wikipedia:Requests for undeletion. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current main page. |
| Archive 100 | ← | Archive 102 | Archive 103 | Archive 104 | Archive 105 | Archive 106 | → | Archive 110 |
Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Josue Joseph
- Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Josue Joseph · ( logs | links | watch ) · [revisions]
Meriseph (talk) 03:35, 13 October 2013 (UTC)
Comment: - this has not been deleted, and you are welcome to edit it and re-submit. What it needs is references to significant coverage in reliable, independent secondary sources to establish WP:Notability.
- Tip: to make a link to another article, you don't need to repeat the word, e.g.
[[Connecticut Connecticut]], just[[Connecticut]]is enough, producing a link like Connecticut. See WP:Wikilink for details, but also read WP:Overlink - don't overdo it. JohnCD (talk) 13:31, 13 October 2013 (UTC)
File:Scott Warner with original Cyclone prototype.jpg
- File:Scott Warner with original Cyclone prototype.jpg · ( talk | logs | links | watch ) · [revisions]
OTRS ticket 2013091210011095 -Fæ (talk) 07:45, 13 October 2013 (UTC)
Done. JohnCD (talk) 12:52, 13 October 2013 (UTC)
Dave Considine
The article was deleted through PROD and would like to request that it be undeleted, I believe he is more than notable and I would like to update the page with accurate up to date information, links ect. One can find references page after page on the net about religious demonologist (Dave Considine) by googling you can find dozens of articles about him, his work and research, book / magazine interviews and radio interviews of him, feature film & multiple documentary film work ect. Thank you -64.252.133.118 (talk) 23:25, 13 October 2013 (UTC)
- Done - as a contested proposed deletion, the article has been restored on request. I will notify user GiantSnowman (talk), who proposed it, and who may choose to nominate it at WP:Articles for deletion, which would start a debate lasting seven days, to which you would be welcome to contribute. JohnCD (talk) 10:11, 14 October 2013 (UTC)
file:Msnbclogo2008.svg
Is this image free enough to be in Commons? NBC logo is considered free to use and sell with trademark legislations. -George Ho (talk) 00:33, 14 October 2013 (UTC)
Not done We do not have to restore this yet because it is still on commons as File:MSNBC 2008 logo.svg Graeme Bartlett (talk) 10:20, 14 October 2013 (UTC)
Ayaan Chawla
I wanted to create Ayaan Chawla article and I have discussed with Mark Arsten who deleted this Ayaan Chawla article and wanted me to add this request. Reply As Soon As Possible. AdamCharles89 (talk) 03:07, 14 October 2013 (UTC) -AdamCharles89 (talk) 03:07, 14 October 2013 (UTC)
- No, I suggest you post to WP:DRV, which is a different board. Mark Arsten (talk) 03:09, 14 October 2013 (UTC)
- Not done. This page is only for restoring uncontroversial deletions. As the article was deleted after Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Ayaan Chawla, it will not be restored here. You have taken the correct first step by approaching Mark Arsten, the closing administrator; as he told you, the next step is WP:Deletion review. JohnCD (talk) 10:31, 14 October 2013 (UTC)
Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Centre for Bioinformatics - Pondicherry University
- Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Centre for Bioinformatics - Pondicherry University · ( logs | links | watch ) · [revisions]
I, Itmalan, request the undeletion of this Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please userfy or restore as appropriate. Itmalan (talk) 08:45, 14 October 2013 (UTC)
- Done - as an Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13, the page has been restored on request. Please edit the page to address the issues raised when it was declined, and re-submit it; "Articles for creation" is not for the indefinite hosting of material found to be unsuitable for inclusion in the encyclopedia.. Read WP:Your first article, and note the need for references showing significant coverage in reliable, independent secondary sources to establish WP:Notability. See also WP:College and university article guidelines#Faculties and academic colleges. JohnCD (talk) 10:21, 14 October 2013 (UTC)
Wikipedia:Articles for creation/Les Brown (Actor)
Just Want A Quick Appeal
Noticed this deleted and went through the routine motions described therin. The person is also The EQ Alert Guy and recently did a radio show, however all totaled may still not qualify for a Wikipedia page. Thank-You!!!Lesbrown99 (talk) 00:49, 7 October 2013 (UTC)
(This user used the preload form for AFC undeletion, but did not specify the name of the AFC draft they would like undeleted. Consider checking their deleted contributions.) Lesbrown99 (talk) 00:42, 7 October 2013 (UTC)
- Done - as an Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13, the page has been restored on request. Please edit the page to address the issues raised when it was declined, and re-submit it; "Articles for creation" is not for the indefinite hosting of material found to be unsuitable for inclusion in the encyclopedia. Graeme Bartlett (talk) 08:04, 7 October 2013 (UTC)
Thank-You!!! (Delete This Entry???)
With all the work now completed on this request, it seems this entire entry COULD NOW BE DELETED. If anyone else who was involved in this matter or an Administrator would like. . . please make this whole convo go away. Thank-You!!! Lesbrown99 (talk) 04:13, 16 October 2013 (UTC)
Naqvi Orientation, again
reasoning -Nannadeem (talk) 21:43, 14 October 2013 (UTC)
this info is very help full and it needs to be modernized this content should stay and should not be deleted this will be help full for others also and for those who wanna do researching on shia muslims -Baqar ul hasan (talk) 08:11, 15 October 2013 (UTC)
This page has not yet been deleted. However, since it is clear that you wish to contest the proposed deletion, I have nominated it at WP:Articles for deletion/Naqvi Orientation. That will start a debate, normally lasting seven days, to which you are welcome to contribute, but please read WP:DISCUSSAFD first. JohnCD (talk) 09:37, 15 October 2013 (UTC)
Paris Lees
Article was deleted due to WP:A1 (insufficient context to identify article subject). I suspect it was talking about this Paris Lees, about whom I'm planning on writing an article. I'd like the article userfied so I can double-check it's about the same person, fix it up, then move it into article space. -—me_and 11:56, 15 October 2013 (UTC)
- Not Done. There was NO content here beyond the title and the boilerplate from the article creation wizard. There is nothing at all worth restoring. The creator apparently started the creation wizard, entered the title, and clicked save without entering any further information. DES (talk) 12:59, 15 October 2013 (UTC)
- Okay, thank you for checking! —me_and 13:59, 15 October 2013 (UTC)
File:Varga_Promo_2012.jpg
OTRS 2013092210007036 raised with an offer to release copyright - I would like to see the image page for additional verification before confirming. This does not preclude speedy deleting if verification fails or if unsuitable for other (non-copyright) reasons. -Fæ (talk) 13:25, 15 October 2013 (UTC)
- Done. I have reset the clock on the di-no-permission tag. You can replace it with the OTRS permission or leave it to expire, as you choose. JohnCD (talk) 19:03, 15 October 2013 (UTC)
- Thanks, sorted. --Fæ (talk) 21:31, 15 October 2013 (UTC)
Wikipedia:Articles for creation/Pacific Economics Group Research LLC
- Wikipedia:Articles for creation/Pacific Economics Group Research LLC · ( talk | logs | links | watch ) · [revisions]
99.126.180.21 (talk) 16:33, 15 October 2013 (UTC)
- Done - as an Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13, the page has been restored on request. Please edit the page to address the issues raised when it was declined, and re-submit it; "Articles for creation" is not for the indefinite hosting of material found to be unsuitable for inclusion in the encyclopedia. JohnCD (talk) 19:11, 15 October 2013 (UTC)
(no title given)
(This user used the preload form for AFC undeletion, but did not specify the name of the AFC draft they would like undeleted. Consider checking their deleted contributions.) 46.23.50.3 (talk) 16:50, 15 October 2013 (UTC)
Question: IP user, you have no deleted contributions from this IP address. Please give the name of the page you want undeleted. JohnCD (talk) 18:58, 15 October 2013 (UTC)
- Not done - Not done as there has been no response. ES&L 21:29, 18 October 2013 (UTC)
User:Targaryen
Please restore my userpage and all other pages I had U1'd that were deleted on 6 June 2013 by Ronhjones. Thank you in advance! -Targaryenspeak or forever remain silent 23:10, 15 October 2013 (UTC)
- Done but being lazy I did not restore the revision where you requested deletion, to save the effort of editting each one to remove it. Graeme Bartlett (talk) 07:49, 16 October 2013 (UTC)
User:AndrewPierre
i don't have any intention of promoting certain party. I was assigned by my lecturer to create a wiki page about an agency. if the content turned to be too "promoting", i am really sorry. however, i follow the format from several similar page which turn out to be fine. I will try to make another one, and if it still contain promotional content please leave it, at least until my lecturer grade it, after that I'll delete it my self. aside from that, can somebody please tell me where did i go wrong? and if possible could I retrieve the content. it would means a lot to me if someone can help me. -AndrewPierre (talk) 14:29, 16 October 2013 (UTC)
- That isn't how it works. If a page has been deleted as G11 (blatant advertising) then it would need a fundamental rewrite to be acceptable. Also, only admins can delete pages.
As an aside, have you read WP:Neutral point of view, or really any Wikipedia policies? —Jeremy v^_^v Bori! 17:32, 16 October 2013 (UTC)- Not done. Promotional material is not restored, and your user page is not the best place to write draft articles. I can email you the text if you enable email (click "Preferences" at the top of the page and look at the bottom of the "User profile" tab). Read WP:Your first article; more advice on your talk page tomorrow, wait till you read that before trying again. JohnCD (talk) 22:12, 16 October 2013 (UTC)
Alison Edmond
Article was deleted by persons with absolutely no knowledge or understanding of the business that said page is relevant to, and deletion supported by people of similar lacking stature. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Alison Edmond (talk • contribs) 01:55, 17 October 2013 (UTC)
- Not done - this Requests for Undeletion process is only for articles that were deleted uncontroversially, and does not apply to articles deleted after a deletion discussion. Since the article you are here about was deleted after a discussion took place at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Alison Edmond, it cannot be undeleted through this process. However, if you believe that the outcome of the discussion did not reflect the consensus of the participants, or that significant new information has come to light since the article was deleted, you may contact the administrator who closed the discussion, user Spinningspark (talk · contribs). After you do so, if your concerns are not addressed and you still seek undeletion, a request may be made at deletion review.
- "Stature" in the world of fashion is not required to assess whether there is evidence of significant coverage in reliable, independent secondary sources, which is the question here; your case will be better served by providing such evidence than by attacking other users. I know that you did not write this article yourself, but please also read WP:PSCOI. JohnCD (talk) 10:11, 17 October 2013 (UTC)
Dialog i35
It is not an advertising or promotion -Chamath237 (talk) 15:47, 17 October 2013 (UTC)
- Not done It looks promotional to me. Also, looking at the editing history of the creator of the article and of the person who filed this request, it looks as though promotion was the intended purpose too. JamesBWatson (talk) 11:09, 18 October 2013 (UTC)
Michelle Hurst
Deleted by JDDUS with the reason of "Only one notable role, and it's a very recent one. Article contains no useful information." My reasons for making the stub:
- There are several other WP articles pointing to this actor.
- She has a very prominent role on an extremely well-received current television show as well as a long career of smaller television roles. http://www.imdb.com/name/nm0403630/?ref_=nv_sr_1
- She also had a starring role in a movie that received many awards - http://www.imdb.com/title/tt0423169/?ref_=nm_flmg_act_10 - as well as other movie roles.
- Clear by just a little Google searching that the actor has a career on the stage.
- I understand there wasn't much useful on the article but isn't that what stubs are for? -Trick (talk) 17:22, 17 October 2013 (UTC)
- Done Normally, an article deleted following a PROD is automatically restored on request, so you didn't need to put s much work into explaining your reason. JamesBWatson (talk)
dutchhousedynasty
it´s a new music act -Maszkovic (talk) 06:28, 18 October 2013 (UTC)
- Not done The article was deleted because it did not give any indication of importance or significance of its subject, and "it´s a new music act" doesn't either. Also, the article was an unambiguous advertisement, and Wikipedia is not a free advertising service. JamesBWatson (talk) 11:35, 18 October 2013 (UTC)
FTN World
FTN World is not a organisation or company, it is a movement for nature and humanity -Hurdson40 (talk) 07:44, 18 October 2013 (UTC)
- Not done The article looks to be about a group of students with no particular claim of importance. If you can find two or more independent references that would be a good start. Graeme Bartlett (talk) 10:41, 18 October 2013 (UTC)
Joju George
I want to provide the more reference links in the article and would want to work on this thereby improving the article. Please suggest on how to get a copy of the article to work on. I would also like the page to be reviewed so that the page doesn't get deleted again. Requesting the admin to restore the page in the wiki -Prardhana (talk) 09:04, 18 October 2013 (UTC) Prardhana (talk) 09:04, 18 October 2013 (UTC)
- Not done Since this was deleted at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Joju George, it would be controversial to have it back as an article. However you could ask for a sandbox userfication so that you can work on it in your own user page. You will have to find reliable independent substantial coverage. Graeme Bartlett (talk) 10:31, 18 October 2013 (UTC)
Animal Instincts (book)
I have no idea why somebody deleted this page! It is so unfair and vague! This was good page. At least somebody could edit it. Why was it so necessary to delete it? I can edit it if it is important. Please undelete it! -Pager1989 (talk) 10:22, 18 October 2013 (UTC)
- Well if it was a book on paper it could not have been deleted under criterion A7. There was no claim of importance in it, that was why it was deleted. If you do have a claim of importance with references, you can recreate it. Graeme Bartlett (talk) 10:37, 18 October 2013 (UTC)
369 Micro Systems
Lost user name and password -Shraddha Kolbekar (talk) 14:38, 18 October 2013 (UTC)
- Comment:: this has not yet been deleted, but is liable for deletion because it has not been touched for over six months. If you now edit it, that will avoid immediate deletion; however, you are encouraged to edit it to address the issues raised when it was declined, and re-submit it; "Articles for creation" is not for the indefinite hosting of material found to be unsuitable for inclusion in the encyclopedia. What it needs is references showing significant coverage in reliable, independent secondary sources to establish WP:Notability. JohnCD (talk) 21:54, 18 October 2013 (UTC)
Sourabh Sharma
We at NDTV truly respects wikipedia's policies and laws.NDTV is a media channel of india and this account belongs to NDTV whatever information which are included in two articles 1.Sourabh Sharma and 2.Citizens Unity Of India both are notable from our side Ndtv is not able to understand that why news coverage is important for any political leader to be included in wikipedia even if a media channel is writing the article by its own.NDTV hopes that you understand our concern. -Ndtv11 (talk) 16:24, 18 October 2013 (UTC)
- This page has not yet been deleted. Please see Proposed deletion of biographies of living people for the instructions for responding to a proposed deletion of a biography of a living person. ES&L 21:26, 18 October 2013 (UTC)
File:Bulkin_Bert_with_CORONA_recovery_hook_about_1960.jpg
- File:Bulkin_Bert_with_CORONA_recovery_hook_about_1960.jpg · ( talk | logs | links | watch ) · [revisions]
Requesting undeletion of the file per permissions and appropriate licensing provided by the copyright holder. Information related to this request can be found at VRTS ticket # 2013051910005195. -I, JethroBT drop me a line 21:18, 18 October 2013 (UTC)
- Done. JohnCD (talk) 21:44, 18 October 2013 (UTC)
Template:Nikon MILC cameras
I request the undeletion of this template, which was speedy deleted today on the grounds of not having any transclusions. Actually, there is a thread at Template_talk:Nikon_DSLR_cameras#Formatting where we were discussing various options how to keep the ever growing camera templates manageable and several people supported to split the MILC cameras out of the DSLR template, not only to make room but also because MILCs are no DSLRs. There was no consensus to put the MILCs into the DSLR template, therefore this template was created in preparation of splitting the MILCs out of the other template. It wasn't included in the various camera articles yet as the discussion was not completely finished. -Matthiaspaul (talk) 00:09, 19 October 2013 (UTC)
Wikipedia_talk:Articles_for_creation/Kim_Carpenter
(This user used the preload form for AFC undeletion, but did not specify the name of the AFC draft they would like undeleted. Consider checking their deleted contributions.) Beatnut88 (talk) 01:19, 19 October 2013 (UTC)
- Done - as an Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13, the page has been restored on request. Please edit the page to address the issues raised when it was declined, and re-submit it; "Articles for creation" is not for the indefinite hosting of material found to be unsuitable for inclusion in the encyclopedia. Graeme Bartlett (talk) 07:22, 19 October 2013 (UTC)
Logan Grove
I don't remember previous drafts of this being "advertising". Grove has had several roles and seems to meet WP:NACTOR. -Ten Pound Hammer • (What did I screw up now?) 17:29, 19 October 2013 (UTC)
- Done The article was deleted by PROD, and then a new version was created, and speedily deleted as promotional. The latest version certainly was promotional, but the PRODDed version wasn't. From what you say, it is clear that it is the earlier version you have in mind, so effectively this is a belated contesting of the PROD, and i have restorde that version, but left the latest, promotional, version deleted. JamesBWatson (talk) 18:03, 19 October 2013 (UTC)
File:Aaroh.jpg
OTRS 2013092510018322 raised with an offer to release copyright - I would like to see the image page for additional verification before confirming. This does not preclude speedy deleting if verification fails or if unsuitable for other (non-copyright) reasons. -Fæ (talk) 22:07, 19 October 2013 (UTC)
-
- Thanks. The FUR is not appropriate, so this is under email correspondence to explain the alternative full release that would be required and this will not get an OTRS ticket unless that happens. --Fæ (talk) 23:55, 19 October 2013 (UTC)
Furrzy
reasoning -Nellbellee (talk) 22:11, 19 October 2013 (UTC) Reason: I have invented Furrzy and would appreciate the same respect others receive.
No one else has a copyright on my Furrzy.
You have my information and may verify this through contacting me.
The reason why it was deleted is because a deleting monitor wanted to delete it because he felt my article was too short. I planned on spending more time on it little by little, including photos, because I am disabled and can only do so much at a time.
Thank you.
- Not done the complete text you wrote was: "Furrzy is a furry and fuzzy little critter. More to come, including photos." If you can find some independent references to support this topic and explain what it really is about then you can recreate this yourself. However if you invented this yourself, then the chances are that no one else has written about it, and the topic is not suitable for Wikipedia. Graeme Bartlett (talk) 22:24, 19 October 2013 (UTC)
PandaHund
It took me a long time to write the article, I just want the text back so I can use it in sandbox mode -ToTheDisco24 (talk) 19:30, 20 October 2013 (UTC)
- Not done. Hoax/joke material like that doesn't belong anywhere on Wikipedia. You could try one of the sites listed under "Comedy site" at Wikipedia:Alternative outlets. I will email you the text if you enable email on your account: to do that, click on "Preferences" at the top of the page, and at the bottom of the "User profile" tab fill in your email address (which will not be visible to anyone) and check the box marked "Enable email from other users. JohnCD (talk) 19:41, 20 October 2013 (UTC)
I have now enabled my email, If you could send me the text I'd be eternally grateful. — Preceding unsigned comment added by ToTheDisco24 (talk • contribs) 19:58, 20 October 2013 (UTC)
- Done. JohnCD (talk) 20:09, 20 October 2013 (UTC)
Olympus VR-340
Valid article on a camera with a nonsensical delete reason. -149.254.51.192 (talk) 11:04, 20 October 2013 (UTC)
- Not done there was only one sentence in this anyway, and an infobox. If you are not the blocked user you are free to recreate this with your own text. Graeme Bartlett (talk) 10:51, 21 October 2013 (UTC)
Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Carlos Katz
I, Lermanico, request the undeletion of this Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please userfy or restore as appropriate. Lermanico (talk) 21:35, 20 October 2013 (UTC)
- Done - as an Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13, the page has been restored on request. Please edit the page to address the issues raised when it was declined, and re-submit it; "Articles for creation" is not for the indefinite hosting of material found to be unsuitable for inclusion in the encyclopedia. JohnCD (talk) 10:29, 21 October 2013 (UTC)
File:Dollysodsflagspruce.jpg
This file was deleted because I didn't specify who created the content. The picture in question was created by me. -Squashpup (talk) 00:55, 21 October 2013 (UTC)
Mohammed Rashaad
I was unaware that I am violating the rules by moving my article from User:Rashaadvf to Mohammed Rashaad. I assure Wikipedia that this may not happen again -Mohammed Rashaad 07:12, 21 October 2013 (UTC)
- Not done - I have explained on your talk page. JohnCD (talk) 10:25, 21 October 2013 (UTC)
Wikilive
I want to write an article about my wiki project on wikipedia, but one of your admins deleted it because he called it "advertising". I wrote the article academically. The article didn't even last 24 hrs. I don't think "advertising" was an accurate reason for my article's deletion when it wasn't even filled out entirely and I didn't even put a logo in my article. Why do Coca Cola and Chris Brown get their own Wikipedia article but my article gets deleted for advertising? I thought wikipedia was all about being the "good dictator". Can't you be a little more flexible on an open source project? -Hdg89 (talk) 12:59, 21 October 2013 (UTC)
- (Non-administrator comment) If you intend to tell about your contributions and activities on Wikipedia, your userpage should suffice. There is no need for a separate article to do so. If this article is about a wiki you've created, it may not be notable yet. Also see WP:OTHERCRAPEXISTS. hmssolent\You rang? ship's log 13:06, 21 October 2013 (UTC)
- Not done. Although we don't explain it as well as we should to new users, Wikipedia is not a place for people to tell the world about themselves or their own projects. Coca Cola and Chris Brown have articles because they are notable subjects, i.e. many people have written about them in independent, reliable sources; but they did not write those articles themselves, other people thought they were interesting enough to write about, see for instance this article history. Your new website would not qualify for an article until it had been the subject of significant coverage in reliable, independent secondary sources, and even then you should leave it to someone uninvolved to write it. Incidentally, there is another "Wikilive", see 1, 2. JohnCD (talk) 20:20, 21 October 2013 (UTC)
Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/RahulEaswar
- Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/RahulEaswar · ( logs | links | watch ) · [revisions]
I, 122.174.196.120, request the undeletion of this Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please userfy or restore as appropriate. 122.174.196.120 (talk) 15:12, 21 October 2013 (UTC)
- Not done because the article already exists at Rahul Easwar. JohnCD (talk) 17:41, 21 October 2013 (UTC)
Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/ThoughtsAcademy
I, 122.174.196.120, request the undeletion of this Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please userfy or restore as appropriate. 122.174.196.120 (talk) 15:12, 21 October 2013 (UTC)
- Not done. Thoughts Academy was not an Articles for Creation submission, it was posted directly as an article, and speedy-deleted as an advertisement. This article has not been restored because it does not appear to meet our guidelines for inclusion of articles about companies. In general, Wikipedia considers a topic to be notable if there exist multiple reliable sources of information on the topic, external to the subject itself. Articles concerning companies will be deleted on sight if they are considered to be unambiguous advertising or promotion, or if they do not contain a credible assertion of the significance of the subject. JohnCD (talk) 17:23, 21 October 2013 (UTC)
Wikipedia_talk:Articles_for_creation/Quartet_Records
I, Tharpdevenport, request the undeletion of this Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please userfy or restore as appropriate. Tharpdevenport (talk) 15:27, 21 October 2013 (UTC)
- Done - as an Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13, the page has been restored on request. Please edit the page to address the issues raised when it was declined, and re-submit it; "Articles for creation" is not for the indefinite hosting of material found to be unsuitable for inclusion in the encyclopedia. JohnCD (talk) 17:20, 21 October 2013 (UTC)
Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Dermalogica
76.201.107.158 (talk) 22:20, 21 October 2013 (UTC)
- Done - as an Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13, the page has been restored on request. Please edit the page to address the issues raised when it was declined, and re-submit it; "Articles for creation" is not for the indefinite hosting of material found to be unsuitable for inclusion in the encyclopedia. JohnCD (talk) 08:24, 22 October 2013 (UTC)
Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/FIX-A-TAP Australia
I now have further information to contribute to the page -Fixatap (talk) 01:37, 22 October 2013 (UTC)
- Done - as an Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13, the page has been restored on request. Please edit the page to address the issues raised when it was declined, and re-submit it; "Articles for creation" is not for the indefinite hosting of material found to be unsuitable for inclusion in the encyclopedia. You will need a new, individual account, as company accounts are not permitted, and should read the WIkipedia:Plain and simple conflict of interest guide. JohnCD (talk) 08:31, 22 October 2013 (UTC)
V Star Creations Pvt Ltd
Article content is completely defines about V Star Creations Company ,founders and the products .V Star Creations is very much popular in South India and its business spread over India and Middle East, also it is the sister concern of V Guard Industries.I felt article related to this much reputed organisation in wikipedia is very much necessary.The contents in the article taken from its own website and other 2 article sites that I mentioned in the reference section of the article. I hope deletion happened as of misread, I kindly request you to please recheck the article and approve the article about V Star Creations. -Jimmywendells12 (talk) 05:07, 22 October 2013 (UTC)
- Not done and will not be done. That was hopelessly promotional, a blatant advertisement written to "sell" the company. That is not what an encyclopedia is for: anything like that is deleted from Wikipedia at sight. JohnCD (talk) 10:04, 22 October 2013 (UTC)
CML Microcircuits
I wish to read the article and do not agree with reason for deletion -109.157.241.130 (talk) 06:59, 22 October 2013 (UTC)
- Done - as a contested proposed deletion, the article has been restored on request. I will notify user Alan Liefting (talk), who proposed it, and who may choose to nominate it at WP:Articles for deletion, which would start a debate lasting seven days, to which you would be welcome to contribute. JohnCD (talk) 09:23, 22 October 2013 (UTC)
Wild Games Studio
Speedy deletion as a non-notable company in 2010. But recently this company has generated significant negative buzz ([1], [2], [3]). and may now pass WP:GNG. As such, this article should be restored, with the refs I provided here added; if there are still doubts about notability, a proper WP:AFD should be started. -Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| reply here 07:57, 22 October 2013 (UTC)
- Done - there's not much there, but I have userfied it to User:Piotrus/Wild Games Studio. Consider checking with the deleting admin Airplaneman (talk) whether he thinks your improved version should go to AfD. JohnCD (talk) 09:53, 22 October 2013 (UTC)
Titanik Gallery
The reason why i wish for this page to be undeleted is that even though it has been written by the gallery assistant, we are a non-profit organisation and we do not consider the wikipedia page to be advertising in no way what so ever. We consider the page to be a source of information for future residence artists or tourists visiting the city of Turku. As said, we are a NON-PROFIT organisation so we will not gain ANY financial advantage from having this page on wikipedia. It is purely there for informatic reasons. -Tgassari (talk) 10:11, 22 October 2013 (UTC)
- Done I restored this and moved it to User:Tgassari/Titanik Gallery. It is at least somewhat promotional as it stands. Before trying to take this live again, you need to rewrite this as a neutral account. Promotion need not be of a commercial or for-profit enterprise, it can be of any organization or concept. Even more important, this page needs citations from independent reliable sources to demonstrate its notability. This means sources that are not affiliated with the project. It also means not blog posts or the like, but published accounts. DES (talk) 19:46, 23 October 2013 (UTC)
Phillips Law Offices
Article substantiation is underway, e.g. published references, resources from Illinois Trial Lawyers Association (which managing partner is currently President of and arguing against "lawsuit abuse." -Lukelagis (talk) 14:28, 22 October 2013 (UTC)
- Userfied - the page has been restored to the userspace at User:Lukelagis/Phillips Law Offices. You may work on improving the article's assertion of notability at its new location, but please contact Peridon (talk · contribs), the administrator who deleted the page, before moving it back to the article space. Please see the criteria for speedy deletion and the relevant notability guidelines - articles that are not in compliance will be deleted. What is required is reference showing significant coverage in reliable, independent secondary sources. I would advise truncating or omitting the enormous list of practice areas, which makes it look like an advertisement. If you are connected with the firm, please read the WP:Plain and simple conflict of interest guide. JohnCD (talk) 10:39, 26 October 2013 (UTC)
Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/New Words Bookstore
I, Henloe, request the undeletion of this Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please userfy or restore as appropriate. Henloe (talk) 16:03, 22 October 2013 (UTC)
- Done Please edit and submit is a reasonably prompt manner. Happy editing. DES (talk) 18:18, 23 October 2013 (UTC)
- See User:Henloe/sandbox for where it ended up. Graeme Bartlett (talk) 11:17, 24 October 2013 (UTC)
International Medical Student's Congress in Novi Sad (IMSCNS)
- Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/International Medical Student's Congress in Novi Sad (IMSCNS) · ( logs | links | watch ) · [revisions]
I, Acilimelf, request the undeletion of this Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please userfy or restore as appropriate. Acilimelf (talk) 18:48, 23 October 2013 (UTC)
- Not done. This cannot be restored because it was a copyright violation from the Congress website. Even if a formal copyright release were made, Wikipedia is an encyclopedia, not a notice-board for copies of all the details of registration, deadlines etc. You are welcome to write an article about the Congress, if you can provide references showing significant coverage in reliable, independent secondary sources to establish WP:Notability, but it should be written for the general reader, not for the participants. JohnCD (talk) 10:57, 26 October 2013 (UTC)
Medical Family Therapy
- Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Medical Family Therapy · ( logs | links | watch ) · [revisions]
forgot about it but will add content in next two weeks -76.94.175.192 (talk) 00:28, 24 October 2013 (UTC)
- Not done - there is nothing to restore, what was posted in February 2012 was a blank page. You are welcome to submit something: when you are ready, read WP:Your first article, and try using the WP:Article wizard to guide you through the process. JohnCD (talk) 09:39, 26 October 2013 (UTC)
Kath Eats Real Food
to further explain the notability of the subject. It was speedy deleted initially because someone else had begun the article but failed to indicated the notability of the blog (which has been cited in several national publications and magazines) and the blogger (who has contributed to several national publications). I included a handful of those references, but I guess not enough to establish notability. There are several other sources I can add to the entry to improve the notability as well as some clarifying details. -Tyler (talk) 02:31, 24 October 2013 (UTC)
Archive manager
reasoning -Gasparovicm (talk) 09:20, 24 October 2013 (UTC) I don't know why that stub article was deleted. I would like to expand article about Metalogix Archive manager to be comparable with article https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Symantec_Enterprise_Vault. If article about Metalogix Archive manager was deleted, why article about Symantec Enterprise Vault was not deleted ?
Pan Pantziarka
Pan Pantziarka is now working in the field of Li Fraumeni Syndrome research and advocacy, including proposing a new hypothesis on this rare disease (for example: http://www.oncologynews.biz/pdf/20%20ONJA13/ONJA13_Web.pdf#page=12) Note that there's also a link here to the George Pantziarka TP53 Trust (http://www.tp53.co.uk), which is one of the few public organisations devoted to Li Fraumeni Syndrome. There is also a PubMed paper on research in this area by Pan Pantziarka (http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/?term=pantziarka). If the article is undeleted it should be updated to reflect this.
-195.171.96.100 (talk) 09:24, 24 October 2013 (UTC)
Pan Pantziarka is mentioned in several other articles on wikipedia, which suggests that there is a certain notability here. Also, Googling Pan Pantziarka throws up thousands of results, again suggesting a degree of notability. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 86.31.95.143 (talk) 06:41, 25 October 2013 (UTC)
- Done - as a contested proposed deletion, the article has been restored on request. I will notify user GiantSnowman (talk), who proposed it, and who may choose to nominate it at WP:Articles for deletion, which would start a debate lasting seven days, to which you would be welcome to contribute. JohnCD (talk) 09:28, 26 October 2013 (UTC)
- Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Karmni Grima · ( logs | links | watch ) · [revisions]
reasoning -Mewga (talk) 19:17, 24 October 2013 (UTC)
- Not done: the notice you got was about an Articles for Creation submission back in 2010, but you need not worry about that, because since then the article Karmni Grima has been created, and you have been working on it. Any questions or problems about the content of the article should be discussed on its talk page. The image you tried to add did not show because you used small "g" rather than "G" in the title - capitalisation is important. I have fixed that. JohnCD (talk) 09:48, 26 October 2013 (UTC)
Seek: Finding Your True Calling
The page was not promotional. It is about a useful page for guiding students in choosing their career -Kamalika1912 (talk) 19:51, 24 October 2013 (UTC)
- Not done Wikipedia is not a How To guide ES&L 10:49, 26 October 2013 (UTC)
The Australian Jazz Quartet/Quintet
- Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/The Australian Jazz Quartet/Quintet · ( logs | history | links | watch ) · [revisions]
Jwbeauch (talk) 04:51, 25 October 2013 (UTC) The Australian Jazz Quartet/Quintet
- Done - as an Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13, the page has been restored on request. Please edit the page to address the issues raised when it was declined, and re-submit it; "Articles for creation" is not for the indefinite hosting of material found to be unsuitable for inclusion in the encyclopedia. JohnCD (talk) 09:22, 26 October 2013 (UTC)
Cure Alzheimer's Fund
This page was deleted in February 2012, by a user who appears to be no longer active (Fastily), for the following reason - G11: Unambiguous advertising or promotion. I would like to create a new Cure Alzheimer's Fund page that complies with Wikipedia guidelines, and it would be useful to see the content of the deleted page so I can avoid repeating the errors that got the page deleted in the first place. I'd be happy to just have this text emailed to me. I'm a new user and not familiar with the editing process, so any advice would be much appreciated. -Madels01 (talk) 15:57, 25 October 2013 (UTC)
Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Westcon Group, Inc.
I, 209.205.23.114, request the undeletion of this Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please userfy or restore as appropriate. 209.205.23.114 (talk) 16:14, 25 October 2013 (UTC)
We plan to edit the page.
- Done - as an Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13, the page has been restored on request. Please edit the page to address the issues raised when it was declined, and re-submit it; "Articles for creation" is not for the indefinite hosting of material found to be unsuitable for inclusion in the encyclopedia. Read WP:Your first article and note that you need to give references to significant coverage in reliable, independent secondary sources to establish WP:Notability. JohnCD (talk) 09:14, 26 October 2013 (UTC)
Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Francisco "Pancho" Tomaselli
- Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Francisco "Pancho" Tomaselli · ( logs | links | watch ) · [revisions]
I, Peaceannlove, request the undeletion of this Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please userfy or restore as appropriate. Peaceannlove (talk) 22:09, 25 October 2013 (UTC)
- Done - as an Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13, the page has been restored on request. Please edit the page to address the issues raised when it was declined, and re-submit it; "Articles for creation" is not for the indefinite hosting of material found to be unsuitable for inclusion in the encyclopedia. Check out WP:Your first article for general advice, and WP:MUSICBIO for the WP:Notability standard for musicians. JohnCD (talk) 09:20, 26 October 2013 (UTC)
The International Research Forums on Statistical Reasoning, Thinking, and Literacy
- The International Research Forums on Statistical Reasoning, Thinking, and Literacy · ( talk | logs | links | watch ) · [revisions]
The article was deleted under WP:CSD#A7; I would like to recreate it and believe I can establish credible indication of importance (and eventually notability) for the topic. I would like the prior text of the article to see if anything is usable from the previous version. -Statisfactions (talk) 07:46, 26 October 2013 (UTC)
- Done - I have userfied the article for you to User:Statisfactions/The International Research Forums on Statistical Reasoning, Thinking, and Literacy where you can work on it. Check with the deleting admin, RHaworth (talk), before moving it backk to the main space. JohnCD (talk) 09:59, 26 October 2013 (UTC)
RENT MY VACATION HOME USA
reasoning -Drjonesesq (talk) 11:37, 26 October 2013 (UTC) The article entitled rent my vacation home USA was wrongly deleted. I have researched the history of this article and found that originally the references used were tied to public relations articles. Since then extensive research was done that found several books that support the article that was published. Without any research and without any further ado or discussion the article was deleted and the new information and references were not even discussed or look At because of the speedy deletion . I went to the help room and tried to discuss the matter to explain that this is an entirely different article with totally different references. Within five minutes the entire article was deleted without discussion without looking into their new references. Please restore the work that I have done as there is no reason whatsoever that this article would be deleted. Furthermore the article being deleted this way with unchecked references smacks of other motives that could be in place. We have to ask ourselves why did this happen and how does this improve Wikipedia? It does not improve Wikipedia and it should not have happened the references are from established books and the company written about is the largest vacation rental network in the United States. Please restore without further ado or litigation the work that was done.
- Not done - this article has not been restored because it does not appear to meet our guidelines for inclusion of articles about companies. In general, Wikipedia considers a topic to be notable if there exist multiple reliable sources of information on the topic, external to the subject itself. Articles concerning companies will be deleted on sight if they are considered to be unambiguous advertising or promotion, or if they do not contain a credible assertion of the significance of the subject. ES&L 11:49, 26 October 2013 (UTC)
Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Gangster Politics
I, 2607:FA48:6D2C:2620:F112:574E:38A2:47F, request the undeletion of this Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please userfy or restore as appropriate. I'd like to improve and add to the content so that the page meets minimum standards for a band page. 2607:FA48:6D2C:2620:F112:574E:38A2:47F (talk) 14:42, 26 October 2013 (UTC)
- Done - as an Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13, the page has been restored on request. Please edit the page to address the issues raised when it was declined, and re-submit it; "Articles for creation" is not for the indefinite hosting of material found to be unsuitable for inclusion in the encyclopedia.. JohnCD (talk) 15:09, 26 October 2013 (UTC)
Castlestone Management
The page's content has not been finished when it was uploaded which meant that the majority of citations to outline the page's significance has not been included. Once the correct content goes live with the appropriate citations and notable mentions, the page will comply with the A7 for which it was deleted. -Ormwikibot (talk) 15:21, 24 October 2013 (UTC)
- Comment:: when your username change has been actioned, I will "userfy" this for you - move it into a sub-page in your user space for you to work on. JohnCD (talk) 15:17, 26 October 2013 (UTC)
- Userfied - the page has been restored to the userspace at User:ORMOliver/Castlestone Management. You may work on improving the article's assertion of notability at its new location, but please contact DGG (talk · contribs), the administrator who deleted the page, before moving it back to the article space. Please see the criteria for speedy deletion and the relevant notability guidelines - articles that are not in compliance will be deleted. JohnCD (talk) 21:45, 26 October 2013 (UTC)
George Toma
The article was recreated with notable sources in July 2012 as a stub. However I wanted to recreate the article but was not able to find such sources before then also having a big Red Flag of the Speedy Deletion of the previous article in 2008. The Speedy Deletion took place at 18:11, 28 May 2008 by AuburnPilot for the reason: (CSD A7 (Bio): Biographical article that does not assert significance). However some things took place since 2008 that has added to his notability including being imducted into the NFL Hall of Fame and being inducted into the Kansas City Royals Hall of Fame (the article was recreated at the time of the Royals HoF announcement.) What I am requesting is that the prevoiusly deleted edit history of the article to be restored so I can legally use them per the GFDL and CC-BY-SA 3.0 License to improve the article about George Toma and find sources of those deleted edits. -Sawblade5 (talk to me | my wiki life) 18:44, 26 October 2013 (UTC)
- Also if there was any free images of him in the previously article that was deleted as a result os the Speedy of the Previous Article that was deleted due to it being Orphaned please restore! Sawblade5 (talk to me | my wiki life) 19:02, 26 October 2013 (UTC)
- Done - I have merged the histories, so you can see the previous version, but I am afraid you will not find it much help. There were no images. JohnCD (talk) 21:35, 26 October 2013 (UTC)
File:HD-DVD.svg
This image is too simple to be copyrighted. There are still prior revisions. -George Ho (talk) 19:41, 19 October 2013 (UTC)
- What exactly do you want undeleted? The file has not been deleted, and the three deleted revisions do not differ significantly from the present version: indeed, two of them do not differ at all, as far as I can see. JamesBWatson (talk)
- In other words, prior revisions have the same resolution? --George Ho (talk) 06:14, 20 October 2013 (UTC)
- Yes edition 1 and 3 are the same, 2 has different whitespace due to cropping. Graeme Bartlett (talk) 20:06, 22 October 2013 (UTC)
- In other words, prior revisions have the same resolution? --George Ho (talk) 06:14, 20 October 2013 (UTC)
- Not done JamesBWatson (talk) 12:18, 1 November 2013 (UTC)
Full-size Ford (1969-1978)
Was created as a counterpart to 1960 Ford and 1957 Ford, as well as Ford Panther platform; it was intended to be linked into Full-size Ford. Article was nominated for speedy deletion because it had no page history, but that happened very shortly after the article creation (so there would naturally be none). -SteveCof00 07:37, 21 October 2013 (UTC)
- Comment: Not sure how any of those are appropriate forks of the main articles ... I can't see any reason or consensus discussion to bread full-sized ford into groupings of years like that ES&L 10:40, 21 October 2013 (UTC)
- Not done The article was deleted because it substantially duplicates content in an existing article, and that is true. The other articles you mention may or may not suffer from the same problem, but that is irrelevant to consideration of this one. JamesBWatson (talk) 12:22, 1 November 2013 (UTC)
reasoning -Ashishukla1992 (talk) 16:54, 21 October 2013 (UTC) sir, I think this page is useful for hindi literature readers. He is one of the growing hindi authors. so, please don't delete it. waiting for your response. Regards Ashi shukla
- Comment:: the article Bhagwant Anmol has not been deleted. Deletion is being discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Bhagwant Anmol, and that is where you should comment. Before you do, read WP:DISCUSSAFD. The question is whether he meets the Wikipedia:Notability standard, which requires showing evidence of significant coverage in reliable, independent secondary sources. JohnCD (talk) 17:11, 21 October 2013 (UTC)
- Not done The article now has been deleted, as a result of a perfectly valid deletion discussion at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Bhagwant Anmol. This is not the place to ask for a review of such a deletion discussion outcome. You could try deletion review, but my advice is that doing so would be a waste of time, as the deletion discussion was conducted perfectly properly, and the closure was fully in line with consensus at the discussion. JamesBWatson (talk) 12:31, 1 November 2013 (UTC)
ZS Associates
I am an employee of a company called Sikich LLP. We work on behalf of ZS Associates,and are trying to understand what violations occurred when the ZS Associates page was deleted. It appears the ZS Associates page was deleted in 2009 and again in 2013. We are currently deciding if we would like to resurrect the deleted page, or submit a new page for review altogether. At this time, we are requesting to view archived content from both the 2009 and 2013 deleted pages. Please send these archived pages to the email address associated with my account. Thank you!- Sarp14 -99.43.123.185 (talk) 20:07, 23 October 2013 (UTC)
- Not done There is no email account associated with Sarp14, so unless you mean some other account, that is not possible. However, you clearly have a conflict of interest in writing about this company, anyway. Wikipedia is not a free advertising service, and does not exist to host pages written "on behalf" of businesses to promote their desired image. JamesBWatson (talk) 12:37, 1 November 2013 (UTC)
File:NBC logo 2011.png
This image is no longer copyrighted; rather Commons found NBC logos ineligible for copyright. -George Ho (talk) 04:51, 24 October 2013 (UTC)
- Are there any revisions with higher resolution? --George Ho (talk) 05:57, 28 October 2013 (UTC)
- Yes, I reverted to one. — Jeff G. ツ (talk) 07:35, 3 November 2013 (UTC)
Internet commentator
Someone requested to delete the redirect page Internet commentator, at that time this page is redirecting to 50 Cent Party. His reason was something like "50 Cent Party is simply just an example of an internet commentator, 'internet commentator' should be written with a worldwide view point", this reason is pretty good, I actually agree with that, thus I completely rewrote the page, making it a disambiguation page, where readers could choose to go to Internet pundit, Internet critic, Internet sports commentator, Internet commentator, or 50 Cent Party (officially called "Internet commentator" by Chinese authority). However, I forgot to go to Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2013 October 18#Internet commentator to discuss. All guys there seem not to be aware of my rewrite, and it was eventually deleted. This is a valid search term, it has several valid meanings which can be link to several articles, it can be and should be a disambiguation page, please restore it. Thank you. -Tomchen1989 (talk) 12:21, 26 October 2013 (UTC)
- Done since it was not a redirect it should have been out of scope for RFD. Graeme Bartlett (talk) 09:49, 27 October 2013 (UTC)
National Center for Missing & Exploited Children, Pakistan
reasoning -39.45.192.70 (talk) 08:25, 27 October 2013 (UTC)
- Not done the article was written from somebody from the organisation, and thus had the wrong point of view, and was trying to make the organisation sound great. Instead you are welcome to write a non-promotional article on the topic, hopefully based on what others have written about it. Graeme Bartlett (talk) 09:53, 27 October 2013 (UTC)
Talk:Song of General Kim Il-sung
The article was undeleted, so the talk page, which was deleted per WP:CSD#G8, should also be restored. -Stefan2 (talk) 23:09, 27 October 2013 (UTC)
- Done – Valid reasoning as per #G8 on page dependency, as pointed out by Stefan. —Menchi (talk) 03:56, 28 October 2013 (UTC)
Public Sector Marketing
My article has been erased because of a copyright's problem. I asked to put the text under the free license "Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 3.0 Unported" by writing an email at <permissions-commons@wikimedia.org>. But nobody cant see the text, because it has been erased. I've been told that I need to request an undeletion here. The permission is stored in OTRS ticket number 2013102110004136. Thanks. -MCidheap (talk) 07:52, 28 October 2013 (UTC)
Westside Barbell
Increased notability since original deletion -75.180.29.69 (talk) 13:19, 28 October 2013 (UTC)
The article on the Westside Barbell club was deleted in 2006 due to non-notability. Since then, the profile of this club and its founder Louie Simmons have considerably increased. Westside Barbell continues to be relevant in top-level powerlifting[1-2] and Louie Simmons' club is now cited as an important influence on other sports, including football,[3] boxing[4] and CrossFit. Wikipedia has several red links to Westside Barbell or Louie Simmons, such as in the bench press and good-morning articles and in the CrossFit article cited above, and an underdeveloped page on the Conjugate method citing Simmons and Westside. A Westside Barbell article could collect the information on 'Westside' methods (conjugate, bands/chains, special exercises and so on) and describe how these have been applied in powerlifting and other sports. Thank you for considering this request. 75.180.29.69 (talk) 13:19, 28 October 2013 (UTC)
- [1] http://www.menshealth.com/fitness/powerlifting-1/page/2
- [2] http://www.columbusalive.com/content/stories/2012/02/30/the-arnold-a-day-in-the-life-of-powerlifter-brandon-lilly.html
- [3] http://www.shakinthesouthland.com/2012/1/26/2707898/on-clemsons-s-c-program-and-our-problems-with-batson
- [4] http://www.columbusalive.com/content/stories/2012/12/13/qa-with-boxing-coach-rob-pilger.html
- 75.180.29.69 (talk) 13:24, 28 October 2013 (UTC)
- Done - as a contested proposed deletion, the article has been restored on request. Note that Westside Barbell was a redirect to Louie Simmons, which was prod deleted, so I have restored both. Please add the new evidence of notability. Graeme Bartlett (talk) 20:16, 28 October 2013 (UTC)
Rupali_Krishnarao
this page has been created for her fans -Rupali Krishnarao (talk) 17:24, 28 October 2013 (UTC)
Christian Economy
I have gathered some reliable data on subject and now can make my article more scientific -95.221.26.244 (talk) 19:23, 29 October 2013 (UTC)
- Done - as a contested proposed deletion, the article has been restored on request. I will notify user StAnselm (talk), who proposed it, and who may choose to nominate it at WP:Articles for deletion, which would start a debate lasting seven days, to which you would be welcome to contribute. JohnCD (talk) 12:30, 30 October 2013 (UTC)
Little Caprice
reasoning -Techgeek1992 (talk) 23:55, 29 October 2013 (UTC)
There are MANY smaller less important pages on Wiki. This should have been kept, as it would have been expanded very quickly. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Techgeek1992 (talk • contribs) 23:57, 29 October 2013 (UTC)
- Not done - there was nothing there worth restoring - it only said she was a porn actress and gave her d.o.b., real name and website. If you want to take the time to write a real article about her, either use th WP:Article Wizard to guide you, or click on Help:Userspace draft and fill in the title, which will set up a draft page for you to work on. Read WP:Your first article, and make sure to give references to significant coverage in reliable, independent secondary sources to establish WP:Notability. For other pages, see WP:OTHERSTUFFEXISTS. JohnCD (talk) 10:48, 31 October 2013 (UTC)
Y Window System
A few days ago I discovered that the page Y Window System was deleted in the PROD just becuase he thought that it was a uselless article about a project that was abanend after it was created. While this might be his opion DGG should be flaged if not banned for such an offensive act to open source. Just because not many people use some thing does not mean he has the right to wipe it off the face of the internet! When people need to find out about a topic where do they go for an unbiast source, Wikipida and yet you let people go around censoring information that they don't like. If you also noticed this person only vandalized the Engilsh version of Wikipida and while there is copys in other laungerages people should not be forced to use google translate. -173.23.116.115 (talk) 00:44, 30 October 2013 (UTC)
- Done - as a contested proposed deletion, the article has been restored on request. I will notify user Psychonaut (talk), who proposed it, and who may choose to nominate it at WP:Articles for deletion, which would start a debate lasting seven days, to which you would be welcome to contribute. What the article needs, if it is to be kept, is references showing significant coverage in reliable, independent secondary sources to establish Wikipedia:Notability. JohnCD (talk) 10:46, 30 October 2013 (UTC)
Ape is a Punished Man
reasoning -Nannadeem (talk) 02:52, 30 October 2013 (UTC)
- Not done. This page is only for uncontroversial deletions; as the article was deleted after a deletion discussion at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Ape is a Punished Man, it will not be restored here. You should first approach the administrator who closed the discussion, user Edgar181 (talk); then, if your concerns are not addressed, you may apply at WP:Deletion review. However, in view of the unanimous agreement at this AfD, and also at your previous AfD and DRV, I suggest it is time for you to accept that Wikipedia is not a suitable place for you to publish your writings, and look for an alternative outlet. JohnCD (talk) 11:08, 30 October 2013 (UTC)
Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/alcohol-infused whipped cream
- Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/alcohol-infused whipped cream · ( logs | history | links | watch ) · [revisions]
I, Rybec, request the undeletion of this Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please userfy or restore as appropriate. —rybec 07:06, 30 October 2013 (UTC)
- Done - as an Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13, the page has been restored on request. Please edit the page to address the issues raised when it was declined, and re-submit it; "Articles for creation" is not for the indefinite hosting of material found to be unsuitable for inclusion in the encyclopedia. JohnCD (talk) 10:52, 30 October 2013 (UTC)
Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/The Original 13th Amendment
- Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/The Original 13th Amendment · ( logs | links | watch ) · [revisions]
I, GLOOG1, request the undeletion of this Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please userfy or restore as appropriate. Update & revise as needed -GLOOG1 (talk) 12:15, 30 October 2013 (UTC)
- Done - as an Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13, the page has been restored on request. Please edit the page to address the issues raised when it was declined, and re-submit it; "Articles for creation" is not for the indefinite hosting of material found to be unsuitable for inclusion in the encyclopedia. JohnCD (talk) 12:37, 30 October 2013 (UTC)
Sunil Nambiar
reasoning -Bhaveshbarot1107 (talk) 12:47, 30 October 2013 (UTC)
I want an article about this person. or at least you guys make one about him. I want it on wiki such a nice article
- Not done - this article has not been restored because it does not appear to meet our guidelines for inclusion of articles about people. In general, Wikipedia considers a topic to be notable if there exist multiple reliable sources of information on the topic, external to the subject itself. Articles concerning people will be deleted on sight if they are considered to be unambiguous advertising or promotion, or if they do not contain a credible assertion of the significance of the subject. JohnCD (talk) 12:08, 31 October 2013 (UTC)
Mohammad Akram Ansari
This page content the facts about the Ansari community and its leader who is really working for the social and economical welfare of this community. This time Momin Ansar Sabha is present in more than 70 city of Uttar Pradesh and more than 7 States in all over the India. Momin Ansar Sabha organize Annual meetings at Lucknow and its news published in all news papers and broadcast of news channels. It is a registered organisation and its founder is totally non political and he is actually working for the real welfare of Backward class. All the government departments related to Backward society know him very well. His works are appreciating. His acts can be verified online and offline both. If you need any proof you can log on his website: www.mominansarsabha.org or facebook account mominansarsabha or you can asked me to provide you proof from the media side. I humble request you to kindly not remove this page because in future this page will help to the scholar to know and learn more about Ansari community and its working and about its founder. I will keep on update this page with reliable references. -Atifshaan (talk) 13:26, 30 October 2013 (UTC)
- Not done. This page cannot be restored, because it was a copyright violation from http://mominansarsabha.org. Wikipedia cannot accept material copied from other sites - see WP:Copy-paste - unless a formal copyright release is made; and there would be no point doing that, because this text is written to promote, and Wikipedia is not a notice-board for copies of organizations' own promotional literature - it is not for promotion of any kind, even of good causes. If you want to write a neutral encyclopedia article on this subject, read WP:Your first article, write in your own words, and note that you will need to give references to significant coverage in reliable, independent secondary sources to establish WP:Notability. JohnCD (talk) 21:16, 30 October 2013 (UTC)
Mansions of Madness
subject is notable, article merely needs work. -86.144.206.98 (talk) 17:02, 30 October 2013 (UTC)
- Article was deleted at the end of an expired PROD. I'm quite willing to work on the article and make sure it doesn't fail Wiki's notability guideline again. 86.144.206.98 (talk)
- Done - as a contested proposed deletion, the article has been restored on request. I will notify user FreeRangeFrog (talk), who proposed it, and who may choose to nominate it at WP:Articles for deletion, which would start a debate lasting seven days, to which you would be welcome to contribute. JohnCD (talk) 21:01, 30 October 2013 (UTC)
- Thank you. 86.144.206.98 (talk) —Preceding undated comment added 01:02, 31 October 2013 (UTC)
Moothurai
Moothurai was written by avvaiyar in the year 5 BC or ^ BC, and it is inappropriate to delete the page -117.193.18.151 (talk) 21:12, 30 October 2013 (UTC)
- Done - as a contested proposed deletion, the article has been restored on request. I will notify user R'n'B (talk), who proposed it, and who may choose to nominate it at WP:Articles for deletion, which would start a debate lasting seven days, to which you would be welcome to contribute. JohnCD (talk) 12:01, 31 October 2013 (UTC)
United Visual Artists
Award winning firm. Plenty of coverage in reliable independent sources. Links provided at the bottom of my talk page -Candleabracadabra (talk) 06:34, 31 October 2013 (UTC)
- I am happy to work on it in my userspace. Thanks. Candleabracadabra (talk) 06:44, 31 October 2013 (UTC)
- Done WormTT(talk) 08:40, 31 October 2013 (UTC)
Haakon Faste
this article was about a person who was a visiting assistant professor in 2010, not famous enough to warrant a wikipedia page. Since then he has served as Assistant Professor at Carnegie Mellon University, and now at the California College of the Arts in San Francisco, and is becoming a quickly rising star in the interaction design community. -162.225.150.79 (talk) 14:48, 31 October 2013 (UTC)
- Done - as a contested proposed deletion, the article has been restored on request. I will notify user Ukexpat (talk), who proposed it, and who may choose to nominate it at WP:Articles for deletion, which would start a debate lasting seven days, to which you would be welcome to contribute. Please add any references that will help show how he meets the notability standard of WP:PROF. I hope "quickly rising star" does not mean that you will rely on the argument that he is "up and coming". JohnCD (talk) 18:11, 31 October 2013 (UTC)
Lal Bahadur Shastri Institute of Management & Technology
- Lal Bahadur Shastri Institute of Management & Technology · ( talk | logs | links | watch ) · [revisions]
The article is about Educational Institute, which is listed in top 50 business management schools. I can say that deletion action by Jimfbleak with reason " G11: Unambiguous advertising or promotion" is not right at all. Article is deleted same day. I request to other administrators please review this article and kindly restore the page. -GKCH (talk) 16:23, 31 October 2013 (UTC)
- I request to administrators, please review this deleted article.GKCH (talk) 04:08, 2 November 2013 (UTC)
- I have "userfied" it to User:Gokulchandola/Lal Bahadur Shastri Institute of Management & Technology for you to work on. Advice on your talk page. JohnCD (talk) 21:45, 3 November 2013 (UTC)
- I request to administrators, please review this deleted article.GKCH (talk) 04:08, 2 November 2013 (UTC)
An Cumann Gaelach, TCD
This article was written for the purposes of informing the world about the Cumann Gaelach Irish Society of Trinity College Dublin. Many societies in Trinty have similar wikipedia pages. There should be no reason as to why this page was deleted in the first place. It stated factual information only about founder members and its purpose in the college. If indeed there is any content within the article that is deemed inappropriate by Wikipedia administrators I will be happy to edit such content out of the article. -Feezleweezle (talk) 16:29, 31 October 2013 (UTC)
- Not done. Wikipedia's inclusion criterion is called Wikipedia:Notability and is not a matter of opinion but has to be demonstrated by showing "significant coverage in reliable sources that are independent of the subject." Experience shows (see WP:BRANCH) that local chapters of national organizations are very seldom able to demonstrate notability in their own right, so that they are better covered by a mention in the main article.
- Most of the content of the deleted article was detailed lists of every committee member for the last seven years. That might possibly be of interest to the members themselves, or even to other members of the college, but it is of no conceivable interest to the general reader of a global encyclopedia. It is material for your own website. Wikipedia is not a notice-board for organizations, or people, to "inform the world" about themselves.
- Before you tell me about other similar articles, read WP:OTHERSTUFFEXISTS. Unsuitable articles slip through, but that is not a reason for admitting more. JohnCD (talk) 17:41, 31 October 2013 (UTC)
- Since Feezleweezle is offering to work on improving the article, maybe it can be userfied and moved to a subpage of their account. After all, the problem you cite is that it's not notable but if legitimate sources can be found, it could always be resubmitted. A better article is the goal, right? Liz Read! Talk! 21:23, 31 October 2013 (UTC)
- Not done and will not be done No, a better article is not the goal. That would be the goal in the case of a poorly written article on a suitable subject, but not in the case of a purely promotional article on an unsuitable subject. Apart from the fact that the subject is a completely non-notable student society, there is the fact that the article was purely promotional. (The request even says so: we are told that the article existed "for the purposes of informing the world about" the society.) This sort of article belongs on the society's own web site, if it has one, and somewhere like facebook if it hasn't, not in an encyclopaedia. JamesBWatson (talk) 11:25, 1 November 2013 (UTC)
Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Ronnie Woo
I, Pressreleasesr, request the undeletion of this Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please userfy or restore as appropriate. Pressreleasesr (talk) 17:36, 31 October 2013 (UTC)
- Done - as an Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13, the page has been restored on request. This page has never been submitted for review, but would not be acceptable in its present form. Read WP:Your first article, and note particularly the need for references to significant coverage in reliable, independent secondary sources to establish WP:Notability. Please develop the article and submit it as soon as convenient: "Articles for creation" is not for the indefinite hosting of material found to be unsuitable for inclusion in the encyclopedia. JohnCD (talk) 22:55, 31 October 2013 (UTC)
Inga Neverauskaite Fitness Pro.jpg
This jpeg belongs to Inga Neverauskaite and is being used on a page created for her. It is credited properly in the description. -GlennDWilson (talk) 19:40, 31 October 2013 (UTC) This jpeg belongs to Inga Neverauskaite and is being used on a page created for her. It is credited properly in the description.
- Not done. We cannot help you here, because the file was deleted from Commons, a separate organization, as a copyright violation - see this edit You will have to ask there - start with the deleting Commons admin, whose talk page there is at Commons:User talk:High Contrast. Just being credited properly is not enough - the actual copyright holder will need to make a formal release under a free license - see Commons:OTRS. JohnCD (talk) 21:34, 31 October 2013 (UTC)
izumi tabata
request to view article -91.186.225.66 (talk) 20:19, 31 October 2013 (UTC)
- The whole text of the article was
"Izumi Tabata is a professor at the College of Sport and Health Science at Ritsumeikan University best known for developing and researching a method of high-intensity interval training known as the Tabata Method (called the "IE1 protocol" by Tabata)."
- plus a link to his profile page. JohnCD (talk) 22:51, 31 October 2013 (UTC)
- I hope this is not out of place, but Tabata and his method are demonstrably notable: his article on the Tabata method is highly cited (assessed using Google Scholar) and the method itself has been discussed in mainstream media ([4]) and in articles and books about sports training (examples: [5] [6]). On the other hand, Tabata's method is already mentioned in the HIIT article. But it seems to me he is notable enough for a separate article. If you judge this to be the case, I can fill out the article with text and citations to show notability. Thank you. 75.180.29.69 (talk) 01:58, 1 November 2013 (UTC)
Yes please, that would be wonderful if you could kindly fill out the article with text and citations. Thanks so much. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 46.248.221.254 (talk) 10:33, 1 November 2013 (UTC)
- Not done There is actually no request for undeletion here, just a request to know what it said, which has been dealt with. As for the follow up remarks, if the subject satisfies Wikipedia's notability guidelines, particularly the general notability guideline and the guideline on notability of people then there is nothing to stop a new article about him from being written. JamesBWatson (talk) 12:10, 1 November 2013 (UTC)
- I appreciate the clarification. 75.180.29.69 (talk) 12:40, 1 November 2013 (UTC)
Chi Alpha Nu
Chi Alpha Nu is a valid organization (founded in 1927) on the Muskingum University campus. The reason it was deleted is not clear (just says PROD). -152.228.130.195 (talk) 21:32, 31 October 2013 (UTC)
- Not done ... or, to be more precise, restored following your contesting of the PROD, but immediately deleted again for different reasons. For what it's worth, the PROD reason, which for some reason was not recorded in the deletion log, was "Non-notable single chapter-college club; only source is facebook page; totally fails WP:N and WP:ORG". However, the article clearly qualified for speedy deletion under crtiteria A7 and G11. As a purely promotional article, it is not suitable for undeletion. JamesBWatson (talk) 11:37, 1 November 2013 (UTC)
Jaime Gomez Arellano
reasoning -86.160.237.94 (talk) 00:05, 1 November 2013 (UTC)
Reasons are simple:
http://www.recordproduction.com/record-producer-features/jaime-gomez-arellano.htm
http://www.deafsparrow.com/jaime-gomez-arellano-interview-2011.html
http://www.audioprointernational.com/news/read/ssl-aws948-desk-arrives-at-orgone-studios/05583
http://www.discogs.com/artist/Jaime+Gomez+Arellano
This guy has worked with some very important bands. The page deletion was back in 2008, have a look at his work.
Thank you
- For this I suggest that you recreate it with the references. The old version had no references. We can restore the history if you have something that will survive. Graeme Bartlett (talk) 02:04, 2 November 2013 (UTC)
David Z
Note: Currently, David Z is a redirect to David Z (disambiguation).
I'm posting this request to revert the contents of David Z to a previous version that was deleted by an administrator without moving the article to another location. From what it looks like, the previous version of David Z was supposed to be moved to David Z (rock musician) as part of a page move discussion, but it looks like an administrator accidentally deleted David Z instead of moving it, then deleting the redirect that was left over on David Z to free the article name for the move request. Even though I am involved in the previously mentioned move discussion, since that the move discussion has not been closed, I tried to make sure that all related articles and redirects remained where they were until the discussion is closed. Unfortunately, before I realized that the entire article was accidentally deleted, I messed up big time and moved David Z (disambiguation) on top of David Z (I have since reversed this move); due to this, I cannot find the name of the administrator who deleted the previous version of David Z. In a nutshell, this request is to delete the current version of David Z (the redirect), and restore the version of David Z that existed before I carelessly moved David Z (disambiguation) on top of it. -Steel1943 (talk) 02:59, 1 November 2013 (UTC)
Note: I hope this is the right venue for this request. Given the situation, it was the one that made sense to me since a version of the article needs to be undeleted. Steel1943 (talk) 03:31, 1 November 2013 (UTC)
- Not done There is actually nothing to undelete. The original article David Z was moved to David Zablidowsky on 26 October 2013 by Geo Swan, before the move discussion was started. David Zablidowsky was then turned into a redirect to ZO2. All that was left at David Z was a redirect to ZO2, and that was what was overwritten when you moved David Z (disambiguation). There was also a record in the history of David Z of an earlier redirect to David Zablidowsky, but absolutely no article content has been deleted at all: only redirects. JamesBWatson (talk) 10:54, 1 November 2013 (UTC)
- Thanks for finding David Zablidowsky: that was the missing piece of the puzzle! Given the situation, I did not know of it's existence! Steel1943 (talk) 15:14, 1 November 2013 (UTC)
Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Roma Armbrust (environmentalist)
- Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Roma Armbrust (environmentalist) · ( logs | links | watch ) · [revisions]
I, Kcgold, request the undeletion of this Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please userfy or restore as appropriate. Kcgold (talk) 03:21, 1 November 2013 (UTC)
- Done - as an Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13, the page has been restored on request. This page has never been submitted for review: please develop it (read WP:Your first article for advice) and submit it as soon as convenient: "Articles for creation" is not for the indefinite hosting of material found to be unsuitable for inclusion in the encyclopedia. JohnCD (talk) 14:25, 1 November 2013 (UTC)
en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wnextlike
reasoning -WNextLike (talk) 10:07, 1 November 2013 (UTC)
1 = en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wnextlike 2 = I am the owner of WNextLike and would like to know why my page being deleted.
- Not done and will not be done You just tried to advertise your site without any attempt at encyclopaedic content Jimfbleak - talk to me? 11:40, 1 November 2013 (UTC)
Madhurima Tuli
Article was speedily deleted, but sources such as this one and this one indicate she has had at least one starring role and has played significant parts in television and cinema features. I think at the very least a deletion discussion is warranted based on these strong assertions of notability. Thanks for your kind consideration. Candleabracadabra (talk) 13:47, 1 November 2013 (UTC)
- Not done, because there has never been an actual article about her. What was created on 21 Oct and deleted per A7 the same day was simply a redirect to Kasturi (TV series). So, if you think there is enough for a viable article, go ahead and write one. JohnCD (talk) 14:43, 1 November 2013 (UTC)
- Hmmmm. Okay. Thanks. Candleabracadabra (talk) 15:53, 1 November 2013 (UTC)
Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Blair Lewis
- Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Blair Lewis · ( logs | links | watch ) · [revisions]
I, 206.217.98.250, request the undeletion of this Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please userfy or restore as appropriate. 206.217.98.250 (talk) 16:44, 1 November 2013 (UTC)
- Done - as an Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13, the page has been restored on request. This page has never been submitted for review: please develop it (read WP:Your first article for advice) and submit it as soon as convenient: "Articles for creation" is not for the indefinite hosting of material found to be unsuitable for inclusion in the encyclopedia. JohnCD (talk) 17:51, 1 November 2013 (UTC)
Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/David Marks (politician)
- Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/David Marks (politician) · ( logs | links | watch ) · [revisions]
I, 167.102.138.245, request the undeletion of this Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. David Marks is a politician from Baltimore County. This page is an attempt to document his tenure in community service. Please userfy or restore as appropriate. 167.102.138.245 (talk) 17:49, 1 November 2013 (UTC)
- Done - as an Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13, the page has been restored on request. Please edit the page to address the issues raised when it was declined, and re-submit it; "Articles for creation" is not for the indefinite hosting of material found to be unsuitable for inclusion in the encyclopedia. JohnCD (talk) 18:01, 1 November 2013 (UTC)
Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/International Learning Group School, Pristina, Kosovo
- Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/International Learning Group School, Pristina, Kosovo · ( logs | links | watch ) · [revisions]
I, 46.99.57.18, request the undeletion of this Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please userfy or restore as appropriate. I am working on this article. 46.99.57.18 (talk) 06:55, 2 November 2013 (UTC)
- Done - as an Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13, the page has been restored on request. The page was deleted because it had not been touched for over a year: please edit it to address the issues raised when it was declined, and re-submit it; "Articles for creation" is not for the indefinite hosting of material found to be unsuitable for inclusion in the encyclopedia. JohnCD (talk) 20:03, 2 November 2013 (UTC)
Estimation statistics
Page was not a duplication as proposed in the nomination for deletion. I would like to add that estimation statistics is an important subfield of statistics, the details of which are not covered by the estimation theory article that it now re-directs to or any other other wikipedia page completely, the issues are only touched upon in the effect size and meta-analysis pages. The estimation statistics page was substantiated by more than a dozen references to authoritative textbooks and landmark articles in the field of biomedical statistics. -Upisaida (talk) 05:37, 25 October 2013 (UTC)
- Done I see no good reason for having two articles on this topic, rather than merging the content into one. However, I have reversed the deletion because I do not think that the cited speedy deletion criterion was valid. Criterion A10 is "Recently created article that duplicates an existing topic", and I cannot regard an article nearly five months old as "recently created". JamesBWatson (talk) 12:50, 1 November 2013 (UTC)
Thank you. I have now edited the page to delineate between estimation theory (a branch of signal processing) and estimation statistics (a branch of frequentist statistics widely used in medical research).-Upisaida (talk) 08:27, 7 November 2013