Wikipedia:Requests for undeletion/Archive 116

Archive 110

←

Archive 114

Archive 115

Archive 116

Archive 117

Archive 118

→

Archive 120

Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/The Institute of Export

• Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/The Institute of Export · ( logs | links | watch ) · [revisions]

I, Ies1602, request the undeletion of this Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please userfy or restore as appropriate. Ies1602 (talk) 12:46, 28 January 2014 (UTC)

Done - as an Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13, the page has been restored on request. Please edit the page to address the issues raised when it was declined, and re-submit it; "Articles for creation" is not for the indefinite hosting of material found to be unsuitable for inclusion in the encyclopedia. JohnCD (talk) 20:08, 28 January 2014 (UTC)

Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Brio Singers

• Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Brio Singers · ( logs | links | watch ) · [revisions]

I, 203.80.251.33, request the undeletion of this Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please userfy or restore as appropriate. 203.80.251.33 (talk) 10:22, 28 January 2014 (UTC)

Done - as an Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13, the page has been restored on request. Please edit the page to address the issues raised when it was declined, and re-submit it; "Articles for creation" is not for the indefinite hosting of material found to be unsuitable for inclusion in the encyclopedia.. Check out WP:MUSICBIO for Wikipedia's notability standard for articles about musical performers. Also check out WP:PEACOCK: Wikipedia is not for any kind of promotion, and fluff like "a vibrant and unique journey of musical experience" will not be accepted. JohnCD (talk) 20:17, 28 January 2014 (UTC)

Sandip Goswami, again

Honorable Sir , I am a fan of Poet Sandip Goswami. I am not a relative of Mr. Goswami. Poet Sandip Goswami lives at a small towm Nabadwip which was ancient capital of undivided Bengal. So he is out of lime light. I created a page about Sandip Goswami in facebook. [1] and distributing his great Bengali poems , articles , Inflaming ( philosophy ). Some great magazines in Facebook are shearing poems of Poet Sandip Goswami. About 5,00,000 Bengali people in the world are reading his creation through Facebook with love and respect. I am trying to do my best. Unfortunately Wikipedia does not understand to the value of Sandip Goswami . Poet Sandip Goswami is a silent person and dislikes every advertisement and believes on every great creation in the world. He got Dipendra memorial award by Dipendra Natya academy at Nabadwip . Please try to understand him with love and respect. Earnestly hope that you will give a chance to the supporters of Poet Sandip Goswami. We want true judgement from Wikipedia. Yours faithfully. Sagnik Goswami, Krishnagar, Nadia, West Bengal, India

• Page name goes here · ( talk | logs | links | watch ) · [revisions]

Enter your reasoning here and then click the "Save page" button below -Sagnik Goswami (talk) 15:16, 28 January 2014 (UTC) Reference :

 Not done. The answer is the same as before. See also advice at User talk:JohnCD#Sandip Goswami. JohnCD (talk) 23:29, 28 January 2014 (UTC)

Armand_Navabi

• Armand_Navabi · ( talk | logs | links | watch | afd | afd2 ) · [revisions]

Enter your reasoning here and then click the "Save page" button below -Nmz787 (talk) 22:03, 28 January 2014 (UTC)

Google searches turn up the Wikipedia page as the first hit, which would have been relevant to me if it hadn't been deleted. Luckily the Internet Archive had it, so it wasn't lost to the world, for now. I'd like to see this music-culture reference returned. https://web.archive.org/web/20130401120941/http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Armand_Navabi

I don't see how this meets criteria for undeletion. LibStar (talk) 23:14, 28 January 2014 (UTC)

Not done - this Requests for Undeletion process is only for articles that were deleted uncontroversially, and does not apply to articles deleted after a deletion discussion. Since the article you are here about was deleted after a discussion took place at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Armand Navabi (2nd nomination), it cannot be undeleted through this process. However, if you believe that the outcome of the discussion did not reflect the consensus of the participants, or that significant new information has come to light since the article was deleted, you may contact the administrator who closed the discussion, user Stifle (talk · contribs). After you do so, if your concerns are not addressed and you still seek undeletion, a request may be made at deletion review. JohnCD (talk) 23:32, 28 January 2014 (UTC)

Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Fawad Khan

• Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Fawad Khan · ( logs | links | watch ) · [revisions]

I, 63.170.11.251, request the undeletion of this Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please userfy or restore as appropriate. 63.170.11.251 (talk) 00:48, 29 January 2014 (UTC)

 Not done as it appears to have been a copyright violation of this pdf document--Fuhghettaboutit (talk) 02:54, 29 January 2014 (UTC)

Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Jason Brown- Author

• Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Jason Brown- Author · ( logs | links | watch ) · [revisions]

68.11.28.208 (talk) 07:34, 29 January 2014 (UTC)

Done - as an Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13, the page has been restored on request. Please edit the page to address the issues raised when it was declined, and re-submit it; "Articles for creation" is not for the indefinite hosting of material found to be unsuitable for inclusion in the encyclopedia. JohnCD (talk) 10:27, 29 January 2014 (UTC)

Pt. Dr.Parag choudhari

• Pt. Dr.Parag choudhari · ( talk | logs | links | watch ) · [revisions]

He is a renowned Indian Classical vocalist.please to know thair talent to people.i made this page please undelete a page -Gaju805503 (talk) 07:44, 29 January 2014 (UTC)

 Not done. This was deleted as an unambiguous advertising or promotion, because it was much too promotional in tone, reading like a PR piece rather than an encyclopedia article, which requires a neutral point of view. I will give some advice on your talk page soon; start by reading WP:Your first article and WP:PEACOCK. JohnCD (talk) 13:50, 29 January 2014 (UTC)

Nihar Saraswala

• Nihar Saraswala · ( talk | logs | links | watch ) · [revisions]

Nihar Saraswala, 35, is a young multifaceted personality, an innovator and an influential social media enthusiast from Gujarat, India.

Nihar belongs to a very simple and humble family. Born in the year 1978 to a journalist Late Shri Subhash Saraswala and housewife Nirupa Saraswala, Nihar always had a big dream for his country and now keenly wants to play a bigger role in leading India’s path to be the Superpower through the positive use of Social Media in creating mass awareness for the country and ultimately a better society. After his schooling in St. Xavier’s High School, he pursued his Bachelor of Science degree from P.T.Sarvajanik College of Science, Surat and also did the Diploma in Computer Application as well as Diploma in Import Export Management as a part of further studies. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Nihar4India (talk • contribs) 17:04, 29 January 2014 (UTC)

Not done. This was copied from nihar4india.com. Wikipedia cannot accept material copied from other sites without a formal copyright release; but this material would in any case be unacceptable. Wikipedia is not a social-networking site like LinkedIn or Facebook for people to write about themselves or post copies of their CVs; it is a project to build an encyclopedia, so it is selective about subjects for articles, see also WP:Notability (people), and writing about oneself is strongly discouraged, for reasons explained at WP:Autobiography and WP:Conflict of interest. JohnCD (talk) 20:43, 29 January 2014 (UTC)

Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Lisa Rosowsky

• Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Lisa Rosowsky · ( logs | links | watch ) · [revisions]

I, MArcBB, request the undeletion of this Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please userfy or restore as appropriate. MArcBB (talk) 18:27, 29 January 2014 (UTC)

Done - as an Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13, the page has been restored on request. Please edit the page to address the issues raised when it was declined, and re-submit it; "Articles for creation" is not for the indefinite hosting of material found to be unsuitable for inclusion in the encyclopedia. JohnCD (talk) 20:46, 29 January 2014 (UTC)

Sharon Corder

• Sharon Corder · ( talk | logs | history | links | watch ) · [revisions]

The person is notable and additional references are now available to bolster the article -Kgligorijevic (talk) 12:36, 29 January 2014 (UTC)

Userfied - the page has been restored to the userspace at User:Kgligorijevic/Sharon Corder. You may work on improving the article's assertion of notability at its new location, but please contact Alexf (talk · contribs), the administrator who deleted the page, before moving it back to the article space. Please see the criteria for speedy deletion and the relevant notability guidelines - articles that are not in compliance will be deleted. JohnCD (talk) 21:33, 29 January 2014 (UTC)

Abdulrahman Farhane

• Abdulrahman Farhane · ( talk | logs | links | watch ) · [revisions]

My good friend User:Sherurcij started this article. He isn't active to see when other contributors have concerns over older contributions he has made. So he can't see whether that older material can be brought into compliance with our current stricter inclusion standards. I am going to request userification to User:Geo Swan/Abdulrahman Farhane. If I don't think it is worth trying to fix, within a week, I'll place a {{db-u1}} on it. Geo Swan (talk) 21:12, 29 January 2014 (UTC) -Geo Swan (talk) 21:12, 29 January 2014 (UTC)

 Done. This was a PROD deletion, so it could go straight back to the mainspace; but it would probably be taken to AfD and I doubt it would survive in its present form. JohnCD (talk) 21:47, 29 January 2014 (UTC)

Shafig bin Laden

• Shafig bin Laden · ( talk | logs | history | links | watch | afd ) · [revisions]

My good friend User:Sherurcij started this article. He isn't active to see if he can bring into compliance older articles he started, that have triggered someone's concern that they no longer meet our current, stricter inclusion criteria. If this article had significant meaningful content, and references, then it probably should not have been deleted, that meaningful content should have been merged into another article, probably Bin Laden family, Carlyle Group.

I am going to request userification. If I find any content worth merging into another article I will (1) merge it; (2) move the userified article back to article space; (3) changeit to a redirect to the article where the content was moved. This will make the contribution handy in the event new events occur that boost the notability of Shafig bin Laden, and someone decides he then merits a standalone article.

If I don't find content worth merging within a week I will place a {{db-u1}} on it. Geo Swan (talk) 21:24, 29 January 2014 (UTC) -Geo Swan (talk) 21:24, 29 January 2014 (UTC)

 Not done. This was deleted at WP:Articles for deletion/Shafig bin Laden, so you should ask the closing admin, Mark Arsten (talk), if you want it userfied. JohnCD (talk) 21:49, 29 January 2014 (UTC)

Abdel Hadi al-Tunsi

• Abdel Hadi al-Tunsi · ( talk | logs | links | watch | afd | afd2 ) · [revisions]

My good friend User:Sherurcij started this article. He isn't active to see when other contributors have concerns over older contributions he has made. So he can't see whether that older material can be brought into compliance with our current stricter inclusion standards. I am going to request userification. If I don't think it is worth trying to fix, within a week, I'll place a {{db-u1}} on it. Geo Swan (talk) 21:38, 29 January 2014 (UTC) -Geo Swan (talk) 21:38, 29 January 2014 (UTC)

 Not done - deleted at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Abdel Hadi al-Tunsi (2nd nomination), so ask Kudpung (talk). JohnCD (talk) 21:52, 29 January 2014 (UTC)

Jamil Qasim Saeed Mohammed

• Jamil Qasim Saeed Mohammed · ( talk | logs | links | watch ) · [revisions]

My good friend User:Sherurcij started this article. He isn't active to see when other contributors have concerns over older contributions he has made. So he can't see whether that older material can be brought into compliance with our current stricter inclusion standards. I am going to request userification. If I don't think it is worth trying to fix, within a week, I'll place a {{db-u1}} on it. Geo Swan (talk) 21:31, 29 January 2014 (UTC) -Geo Swan (talk) 21:31, 29 January 2014 (UTC)

 Done to User:Geo Swan/Jamil Qasim Saeed Mohammed. The article as it appears has been gutted. There is some content in the history, but very little - a single sentence with a single source. Please do not move this back to the mainspace without the agreement of the deleting admin, Anthony Bradbury (talk). JohnCD (talk) 22:02, 29 January 2014 (UTC)

Al-Bashir Al-Faqih

• Al-Bashir Al-Faqih · ( talk | logs | history | links | watch ) · [revisions]

My good friend User:Sherurcij started this article. He isn't active to see when other contributors have concerns over older contributions he has made. So he can't see whether that older material can be brought into compliance with our current stricter inclusion standards. I am going to request userification. If I don't think it is worth trying to fix, within a week, I'll place a {{db-u1}} on it. Geo Swan (talk) 21:36, 29 January 2014 (UTC) -Geo Swan (talk) 21:36, 29 January 2014 (UTC)

 Done to User:Geo Swan/Al-Bashir Al-Faqih. Another PROD, so could go back to mainspace, but would not survive AfD. The only source link doesn't show anything relevant. JohnCD (talk) 22:10, 29 January 2014 (UTC)

Ashley Kirilow

• Ashley Kirilow · ( talk | logs | history | links | watch | afd ) · [revisions]

The original article on Ashley Kirilow was deleted after Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Ashley Kirilow. I worked on a userspace draft after the article was deleted -- one with a distinct history from the original deleted version.

Subsequently, a related article Change for the Cure, started by someone else, was nominated for deletion. The decision was made at that afd that the userspace draft Ashley Kirilow should be moved to article space, and Change for the Cure should redirect to it.

On User talk:Fetchcomms I requested the old history be grafted on to the new article. Fetchcomms seems to be on a wikibreak, so I am requesting the history merge here. I figure since the restoration to article space was a decision made at an afd, the restoration of the revision history of the original article can be regarded as uncontroversial. Geo Swan (talk) 16:02, 29 January 2014 (UTC) -Geo Swan (talk) 16:02, 29 January 2014 (UTC)

 Done. Histories merged. JohnCD (talk) 22:18, 29 January 2014 (UTC)

PlayEnable

• Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/PlayEnable · ( logs | links | watch ) · [revisions]

AbhiG123 (talk) 19:17, 29 January 2014 (UTC)

Done - as an Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13, the page has been restored on request. Please edit the page to address the issues raised when it was declined, and re-submit it; "Articles for creation" is not for the indefinite hosting of material found to be unsuitable for inclusion in the encyclopedia. Read WP:Your first article and WP:Notability (organizations and companies) for advice. JohnCD (talk) 22:30, 29 January 2014 (UTC)

Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/TidalsenseDemo

• Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/TidalsenseDemo · ( logs | links | watch ) · [revisions]

I, PedMayRub, request the undeletion of this Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please userfy or restore as appropriate. PedMayRub (talk) 18:57, 29 January 2014 (UTC)

Done - as an Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13, the page has been restored on request. Please edit the page to address the issues raised when it was declined, and re-submit it; "Articles for creation" is not for the indefinite hosting of material found to be unsuitable for inclusion in the encyclopedia.. Read WP:Your first article for advice, and note the need for references to significant coverage in reliable, independent secondary sources to establish WP:Notability. JohnCD (talk) 22:37, 29 January 2014 (UTC)

Los Angeles Post-Examiner

• Los Angeles Post-Examiner · ( talk | logs | links | watch ) · [revisions]

With a few edits, the significance of the newspaper will be demonstrated through multiple outside sources. I would have done this had I been aware article had been PRODded. -Perfect Orange Sphere (talk) 05:45, 25 January 2014 (UTC)

• this was not a prod but a speedy delete. I believe A7 does not apply to newspapers so you can ask user talk:bbb23 to restore. Graeme Bartlett (talk) 09:30, 25 January 2014 (UTC)

• I can't imagine a newspaper not being a company and subject to A7. I did WP:USERFY the article, though, at the author's request.--Bbb23 (talk) 01:09, 30 January 2014 (UTC)

war room inc

• War Room Inc · ( talk | logs | links | watch ) · [revisions]

Hello There,

I'm writing you as I have been told from Wikipedia that the name War Room Inc is blocked and that an email is needed to be sent to the person who blocked the name.

The reason I'm seeking for further help is I would like to write an article/description on War Room Inc. I had the opportunity to see their work showcased at an event I attended and they are a growing Video Marketing agency in Vancouver, BC. When I went to search more about them, I found no information on Wikipedia describing them and I feel it is important. Not only do they have outstanding work, they are on the leading edge of Video Marketing and I think it should be shared.

I appreciate that you probably receive a ton of emails like this, so thank you for your time to read mine. I would like to ask how I can submit an article on them with out being blocked once again.

Thank you for your time and I look forward to your reply.

Sincerely, Charles— Preceding unsigned comment added by 24.85.253.253 (talk) 00:24, 30 January 2014 (UTC)

• Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/War Room Inc · ( logs | links | watch ) · [revisions]

Not done The AfC submission was deleted as blatant spam; if the company is notable enough to warrant an article, it's probably best to start from scratch using independent sources.

In a separate but related issue, War Room Inc (talk · contribs) was blocked for a spam user name. If the IP wants to continue editing but from a new account, that needs handled at WP:CHU. —C.Fred (talk) 04:03, 30 January 2014 (UTC)

Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Richard E. Pruden

• Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Richard E. Pruden · ( logs | links | watch ) · [revisions]

Information has changed. I would like to finish the page and re-submit for approval. Thank you. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Rpruden (talk • contribs) 06:07, 30 January 2014 (UTC)

Done - as an Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13, the page has been restored on request. Before you put much effort into this, though, be aware that (a) Wikipedia is not a place like LinkedIn or Facebook for people to write about themselves, Wikipedia:Autobiography is strongly discouraged; and (b) it is quite selective about article subjects: references to significant coverage in reliable, independent secondary sources are required to establish WP:Notability, see also WP:ENTERTAINER. JohnCD (talk) 10:33, 30 January 2014 (UTC)

Jatt Dizzle

• Jett Dizzle · ( talk | logs | links | watch ) · [revisions]

Hello I created my page so people can know about my music and creations.I want my Name to be out there. So if anyone ever needs me then can just wiki me. And I can help them out if needed. Thanks for taking your time in reading this.--— Preceding unsigned comment added by Hetva23 (talk • contribs) 03:43, 30 January 2014 (UTC)

Not done - a deleted page with this name does not appear to exist. —C.Fred (talk) 03:54, 30 January 2014 (UTC)

Hey Hetva23. Wikipedia is not for advertising or promotion of topics, or for topics that the world at large hasn't taken note of by treating that topics with significant coverage in reliable sources. There are lots of other places on the Internet that you can get your name out there but an encyclopedia isn't one of them. <@C.Fred: The article was at the title in the headline here, which is spelled differently than the link in the text; I know, I know, I searched a bunch of things too before noticing that>--Fuhghettaboutit (talk) 04:03, 30 January 2014 (UTC)

• Jatt Dizzle · ( talk | logs | links | watch ) · [revisions]

It didn't help that the article on Jatt Dizzle was created by Nitajp (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log), which is not the same account that filed the undelete request. It looks like Nitajp has a conflict of interest with the subject, just as Hetva23 admitted above. —C.Fred (talk) 04:12, 30 January 2014 (UTC)

 Not done. I don't think it matters that the requester is not the article author; but as Fuhgettabout it says, Wikipedia is not here to help new artists "get their name out there" and I see no indication that this is anywhere near the notability standard of WP:MUSICBIO. JohnCD (talk) 10:43, 30 January 2014 (UTC)

Reflux, IIT Guwahati

• Reflux, IIT Guwahati · ( talk | logs | links | watch ) · [revisions]

Enter your This page should not be speedily deleted because Reflux,IIT Guwahati is the annual Chemical Engineering festival organised by Chemical Engineering Department of Indian Institute of Technology Guwahati. It aims to involve the students of the Chemical Engineering and also from closely related fields of Mechanical Engineering, Chemistry and Biotechnology. Reflux which is a unique of its kind welcomes everyone envisaging various learning events and competition and promoting a spirit of Chemical Engineering here and then click the "Save page" button below -Amitc.iitg (talk) 12:51, 30 January 2014 (UTC)

This page has not yet been deleted. Please visit the page to find out how to object to the deletion request. JamesBWatson (talk) 13:04, 30 January 2014 (UTC)

Template:Eventualist

• Template:Eventualist · ( talk | logs | history | links | watch ) · [revisions]

Deleter maintains after questioning that this was a blank template. I maintain it was not, and (s)he was "too quick on the button". I made a mistake myself of writing "test" in the edit summary. The template is based upon {{troutme}} template:troutme (for example see top right of the page) and is intended for placement out of the way on userpages, next to the usual icons. This was the first time after much content creation that I have tried to add to the "Wikipedia culture". Please look at the template and my edit history before deciding whether this template is worthy of undeletion or not. Thank you for your time... I apologize about the triviality of this request, but please understand how important this was to me as my first addition to the culture, and how talk page templating can feel when you're giving it our all. Thank you. -PhnomPencil (talk) 08:52, 30 January 2014 (UTC)

 Done Admin at discussion on talk page advised he did not oppose undeletion.--Fuhghettaboutit (talk) 13:58, 30 January 2014 (UTC)

Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Soka Afrika

• Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Soka Afrika · ( logs | history | links | watch ) · [revisions]

I, Anne Delong, request the undeletion of this Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please userfy or restore as appropriate. I tried to add some references, but the article was deleted in the middle of the process. —Anne Delong (talk) 14:08, 30 January 2014 (UTC)

Hey Anne!  Done.--Fuhghettaboutit (talk) 14:24, 30 January 2014 (UTC)

Anna Camner

• Anna Camner · ( talk | logs | history | links | watch | afd ) · [revisions]

Enter your reasoning here and then click the "Save page" button below -Ingrid Wadelius (talk) 13:33, 30 January 2014 (UTC)

Why?

 Comment:: this article has not been deleted. JohnCD (talk) 15:45, 30 January 2014 (UTC)

CEDIA

• CEDIA · ( talk | logs | history | links | watch ) · [revisions]

Material was not copyright violation. It came from the CEDIA websites at www.cedia.org and www.cedia.net. The Custom Electronic Design and Installation Association is a real trade organization that owns the rights to the acronym CEDIA and all of the content placed on the CEDIA websites. -Havronsm (talk) 15:33, 30 January 2014 (UTC)

 Not done. Yes, and those websites are labelled "© 2012 Custom Electronic Design & Installation Association... This publication, or parts thereof, may not be reproduced in any form without permission from the Custom Electronic Design & Installation Association." Even without that notice, Wikipedia cannot accept copied material without a formal copyright release; publication under our CC-BY-SA license gives any reader the right to copy, modify and re-use for any purpose including commercial, and it is essential that the actual copyright holder understands and agrees to that. Assertion of permission to reproduce by someone on the end of a wire is not enough.

The way to give permission is described at WP:DCM, but that is academic because material written for other purposes is seldom suitable: Wikipedia is not a place for companies or organizations to tell the world about themselves or post copies of their own promotional literature. There are plenty of sites like Myspace and Facebook for that, but Wikipedia is different, a project to build an independent, neutral encyclopedia, so it is selective about article subjects, requiring references to significant coverage in reliable, independent secondary sources to establish Wikipedia:Notability, and people are discouraged from writing about themselves or their own organizations, because of the conflict of interest involved. If you work for CEDIA, please read the WP:Plain and simple conflict of interest guide. JohnCD (talk) 16:43, 30 January 2014 (UTC)

Caratheodory-π solution

• Caratheodory-π solution · ( talk | logs | history | links | watch ) · [revisions]

Enter your reasoning here and then click the "Save page" button below -Mary Suby (talk) 17:07, 30 January 2014 (UTC) The topic is not an advertizement as claimed; it has been published in several peer-reviewed journal articles and practically validated by several researchers in laboratory settings as described in the Wikipedia article.

Done - as a contested proposed deletion, the article has been restored on request. I will notify the anonymous user 91.89.76.208 (talk · contribs · WHOIS), who proposed it, and who may choose to nominate it at WP:Articles for deletion, which would start a debate lasting seven days, to which you would be welcome to contribute. JohnCD (talk) 17:21, 30 January 2014 (UTC)

war room inc, again

• War Room Inc · ( talk | logs | links | watch ) · [revisions]

Hello There,

I'm writing you again ,sorry for the inconvenience I had to create a new account as I lost my passwords, I am fairly new to wikipedia.

I have been told from Wikipedia that the name War Room Inc is blocked and that an email is needed to be sent to the person who blocked the name.

The reason I'm seeking for further help is I would like to write an article/description on War Room Inc. I had the opportunity to see their work showcased at an event I attended and they are a growing Video Marketing agency in Vancouver, BC. When I went to search more about them, I found no information on Wikipedia describing them and I feel it is important. Not only do they have outstanding work, they are on the leading edge of Video Marketing and I think it should be shared.

I appreciate that you probably receive a ton of emails like this, so thank you for your time to read mine. I would like to ask how I can submit an article on them with out being blocked once again.

Thank you for your time and I look forward to your reply.

Sincerely, Charles — Preceding unsigned comment added by Charles MayhemBC1 (talk • contribs) 17:31, 30 January 2014 (UTC)

 Not done: this has already been answered once, about ten items above this. To repeat: the deleted article was much too promotional, and you would do best to start from a clean sheet. If you are the same person as User:War Room Inc, your account is blocked as a promotional username, and you need to request an unblock on the talk page of that account, as explained in the block notice. If you are not the same person, but are connected with War Room Inc, read the Wikipedia:Plain and simple conflict of interest guide. In any case, as a new user you would be well advised to use the WP:Articles for creation process. Read WP:Your first article before you start, and note that (a) if your article tries to "sell" the company it will not be accepted, and (b) you will need to provide references to significant coverage in reliable, independent secondary sources to establish Wikipedia:Notability. JohnCD (talk) 17:54, 30 January 2014 (UTC)

Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Hal Movius

• Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Hal Movius · ( logs | links | watch ) · [revisions]

I, NikolaySandev, request the undeletion of this Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please userfy or restore as appropriate. NikolaySandev (talk) 16:29, 30 January 2014 (UTC)

Done (by another admin User:JohnCD). Bearian (talk) 18:01, 30 January 2014 (UTC)

 Comment: an article on this subject was previously deleted after Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Hal Movius, so I have added a comment to the AfC draft suggesting that before acceptance it should be checked with the closing admin of that AfD. JohnCD (talk) 18:06, 30 January 2014 (UTC)

Integrated Nano- Science and Commodity Exchange

Integrated Nano-Science and Commodity Exchange

Article was deleted under the reasons 1. no indication of importance 2. unambiguous advertising or promotion.

I understand that the article was a deleted 20-12-2010 so alot of time has passed since the page was published and there have been some important updates in this field since that time ( hence adding to a more exciting article). Although the article is about a business, please be clear it was by no meant to be an advertising or promotion ploy but to act as an information system to inform about progression in NanoMaterials and how they are being managed. I would love the oppurtunity to review what was initally submitted and to give a my best shot at editing it fro review again.

and/or have some good advice from one of the adminitrators.

I look forward to being involved here.

Thanks for all the work

Regards Louise Colohan Ireland — Preceding unsigned comment added by LOUISE COLOHAN (talk • contribs) 14:46, 30 January 2014 (UTC)

 Question: what was the exact title of the page you mean? Capitalization is important. We have never had an article at Integrated Nano-Science and Commodity Exchange or Integrated Nano-science and Commodity Exchange or Integrated nano-science and commodity exchange or any of the other variations I have tried. JohnCD (talk) 16:09, 30 January 2014 (UTC)

Hi Louise. Integrated Nano-Science Commodity Exchange was deleted as a patent copyright infringement and thus cannot be undeleted. It was also highly unsuitable content, being written like an advertisement (regardless of whether that was anyone's intent). If at all, this would have to be started from scratch. Can I ask you to please read WP:COI and WP:CORP. If you are determined to go ahead, I suggest you write the article by starting here, and be sure to cite to reliable sources in any draft submitted.--Fuhghettaboutit (talk) 20:29, 30 January 2014 (UTC)

Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Zeke Durden

• Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Zeke Durden · ( logs | links | watch ) · [revisions]

I, Rockfeather, request the undeletion of this Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please userfy or restore as appropriate. Rockfeather (talk) 21:27, 30 January 2014 (UTC)

 Done – @Rockfeather: That page was userfied to User:Rockfeather/Zeke by User:Peridon a few hours ago.--Fuhghettaboutit (talk) 23:09, 30 January 2014 (UTC)

Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Dentists On The Rise Association - DOTRA

• Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Dentists On The Rise Association - DOTRA · ( logs | links | watch ) · [revisions]

I, Maroush22, request the undeletion of this Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please userfy or restore as appropriate. Maroush22 (talk) 19:51, 30 January 2014 (UTC)

Done - as an Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13, the page has been restored on request. Please edit the page to address the issues raised when it was declined, and re-submit it; "Articles for creation" is not for the indefinite hosting of material found to be unsuitable for inclusion in the encyclopedia. JohnCD (talk) 23:16, 30 January 2014 (UTC)

Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Convection Enhanced Delivery

• Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Convection Enhanced Delivery · ( logs | links | watch ) · [revisions]

I, Anne Delong, request the undeletion of this Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please userfy or restore as appropriate. Editors at Wikiproject Medicine would like to check it out. —Anne Delong (talk) 21:46, 30 January 2014 (UTC)

@Anne Delong:  Done. JohnCD (talk) 23:14, 30 January 2014 (UTC)

(e/c)  Not done – @Anne Delong: I'm sorry Anne (and to others who wanted to see it) but that appears to have been a blatant copyright violation of the article abstracted here. I was working on this at the same time as John; following the edit conflict I deleted it.--Fuhghettaboutit (talk) 23:20, 30 January 2014 (UTC)

• (Self-trout) - in retrospect, what with two fairly technical paras and no real lead-in, I should have suspected that and checked. Thanks, Fuhghettaboutit. JohnCD (talk) 23:26, 30 January 2014 (UTC)

--Fuhghettaboutit (talk) 23:29, 30 January 2014 (UTC)

Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Transoft Solutions Inc

• Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Transoft Solutions Inc · ( logs | links | watch ) · [revisions]

I, Cjohnstransoft, request the undeletion of this Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please userfy or restore as appropriate. Cjohnstransoft (talk) 23:35, 30 January 2014 (UTC)

 Not done That draft article was actually not yet deleted at the time your posted your undeletion request and this page is only articles that have already been deleted. However, it is deleted now as it was a blatant copyright infringement of [1] and [2]. Given the conflict of interest that I take from your username, if you own the copyright to that text please note that even if it was suitable for the content of an article (which it was not, as it was promotional text), we could not use it by permission for our use but would require the copyright to be released by a verifiable method.--Fuhghettaboutit (talk) 23:48, 30 January 2014 (UTC)

Nuovo Tea

• Nuovo Tea · ( talk | logs | links | watch ) · [revisions]

The article specifies what the company is by going into some detail of the tea industry. It is a simple article describing a company that operates in the United States. It is not a promotional tool, but merely a representation of what type of company Nuovo Tea is. Please tell me what I must change so that it doesn't get deleted again, thank you! -TeaInfoGuy (talk) 00:20, 31 January 2014 (UTC)

 Not done Hi Teainfoguy. First, the article was a blatant copyright violation of [3] and so it cannot be undeleted, nor recreated with that content. As I said also in the post above, "given the conflict of interest that I take from your username, if you own the copyright to that text please note that even if it was suitable for the content of an article (which it was not, as it was promotional text), we could not use it by permission for our use but would require the copyright to be released by a verifiable method".

Second, the article could not have read as more promotional – it was a poster child for promotion, which is no surprise since it was copied and pasted from the front page of the company's own website. This is an encyclopedia. Encyclopedia articles don't speak at the reader in the first person and say things like "brew a cup of Tea that is not only delicious to your taste buds but also great for your body. Our vision began with a simple concept, to bring the perfect cup of Tea to the masses." This as corporate ad-speak, hawking a product it is proclaiming to be great. An encyclopedia article tells just the verifiable facts, speaks from a neutral point of view and does not try to pump up a topic through opinion-laden proclamations lauding the topic.--Fuhghettaboutit (talk) 00:50, 31 January 2014 (UTC)

I see that the OP re-created the article as Nuovo tea instead of Nuovo Tea, and again it has been speedily deleted (twice). --David Biddulph (talk) 00:58, 31 January 2014 (UTC)

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Alliance_LARP

• Alliance LARP · ( talk | logs | links | watch | afd ) · [revisions]

There has been an over decade long feud between the owners of NERO International and Alliance LARP. The feud is almost entirely one-directional, with NERO owners attacking Alliance LARP in various ways through cyberspace. The most common attacks are attempting to get the webpages of Alliance LARP deleted and attempting to snipe website names before Alliance can get them (the last attempt to do this failed because the owner of NERO International misspelled the name and sniped the wrong website). This deletion request was almost certainly a furthering of that feud. Alliance LARP is an international organization that currently has 17 chapters (http://alliancelarp.com/) and multiple online communities (http://alliancelarp.com/forum/). The owner of the LARP, Michael Ventrella, has been published in Dragon Magazine, is regularly invited as a guest to multiple conventions a year, and has published two full novels. Both he and his organization definitely fulfill the notability requirements for Wikipedia (which was the given reason for the page being deleted). -67.186.29.148 (talk) 22:57, 30 January 2014 (UTC) Also, as further evidence of relevance, this LARP was featured on an episode of G4 Underground, http://www.g4tv.com/videos/37846/g4-underground-larping-sunday-9pm-et/ — Preceding unsigned comment added by 67.186.29.148 (talk) 23:46, 30 January 2014 (UTC)

@Aoidh: The allegation of persecution as the origin of the proposed deletion is so vanishingly unlikely (asserted without any analysis of how that proposed deletion came about) that it's almost a moral certainty you're incorrect. The user who prodded the article is an experienced Wikipedia editor who proposes deletion citing to our inclusion guidelines and has done so on numerous unrelated topics such that the fact that he prodded this one is wholly unremarkable. You should be more careful before throwing out accusations that don't stand up to scrutiny. Meanwhile, all you needed to do to have this undeleted, since it was deleted uncontroversially through prod, was to ask since prods are also uncontroversially undeleted (I feel reluctance to accede to your request because of your accusations, when it would have been pro forma to do so in their absence). I'll do so anyway but note that the fact it was undeleted does not mean it might not be deleted on the merits after a deletion discussion.--Fuhghettaboutit (talk) 01:27, 31 January 2014 (UTC)

NIAMA-REISSER Technology

• NIAMA-REISSER Technology · ( talk | logs | links | watch ) · [revisions]

The article complies after having been edited. User/Admin Trivialist -Alreim (talk) 03:39, 31 January 2014 (UTC)

(Non-administrator comment) The article in its current incarnation has not been deleted, although it qualifies for a G11 at this time. It was moved to Niama-Reisser, where it was deleted as G11 yesterday. §FreeRangeFrog^croak 04:11, 31 January 2014 (UTC)

Collapsed argument from user

I contacted Trivialist today after having deleted the article, which I just now re-uploaded after minor changes. His reason: "several ...". I believe he did not even read the article, nor did he look at the references. My article was already undeleted once before. All this back and forth has given this topic/article NIAMA-REISSER Technology a bad stinge, so that anybody thinks they can deleted right away. There is no advertisement in this article. It is factual content, boiled down to the functionality. I have researched their products extensively. I have edited everything to meet the guidelines. In terms of notability: The COLUMBUS DISPATCH, Channel ABC6 and Channel Fox 28, Coshocton Tribune, Diesel Power Magazine, Ansys, Inc. Fortune 500.. all reported about their products and company. These articles and references have nothing to do with the company. I have listed several other articles like the ECOMOTOR, HUETTLIN, Felix Wankel....that all match mine in style, context and subject. There should not be a problem. Please make sure that the newly uploaded article does not get deleted again. Thanks,Alreim

Kamrul Ahsan

• Kamrul Ahsan · ( talk | logs | history | links | watch ) · [revisions]

69.158.169.239 (talk) 05:48, 31 January 2014 (UTC)

 Comment:: the article Kamrul Ahsan has not been deleted. JohnCD (talk) 09:26, 31 January 2014 (UTC)

Michael the Maven

• Michael the Maven · ( talk | logs | links | watch | afd ) · [revisions]

Enter your reasoning here and then click the "Save page" button below -50.160.103.44 (talk) 05:20, 31 January 2014 (UTC)

This page was very helpful to me in learning about Michael the Maven. I was very surprised at the deletion. I have no vested interest in his notoriety, but found him when searching for online photography courses via youtube. Whomever deleted it stated it was promotional in nature and lacked evidence of notability. Whomever deleted this page should not be editing. I found his products with many great reviews on Amazon, he has a highly publicized presence in photography magazines, has thousands of followers on facebook, etc. He also has a youtube channel that is highly visited. I wanted to tell someone about him and his photography courses but when I googled and clicked on this and it wasn't there, I was miffed. Some idiot is editing for wikipedia when they shouldn't be. There are the most lame, obscure entries... but someone who's products are highly recommended on Amazon gets their page removed? Really? You're better than that, wikipedia.

Done - as a contested proposed deletion, the article has been restored on request. I will notify user Deb (talk), who proposed it, and who may choose to nominate it at WP:Articles for deletion, which would start a debate lasting seven days, to which you would be welcome to contribute. It will help if you can find references to significant comment about him in reliable, independent secondary sources - most of the references are to his own sites or do not mention him. JohnCD (talk) 10:12, 31 January 2014 (UTC)

Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Networking Strategist (2)

• Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Networking Strategist (2) · ( logs | links | watch ) · [revisions]

I, TLBurriss, request the undeletion of this Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please userfy or restore as appropriate. Teddy Burriss 01:16, 31 January 2014 (UTC)

Done - as an Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13, the page has been restored on request. Please edit the page to address the issues raised when it was declined, and re-submit it; "Articles for creation" is not for the indefinite hosting of material found to be unsuitable for inclusion in the encyclopedia. JohnCD (talk) 10:18, 31 January 2014 (UTC)

4th Battalion, 319th Field Artillery Regiment

• 4th Battalion, 319th Field Artillery Regiment · ( talk | logs | history | links | watch ) · [revisions]

I wrote the article today- it parallels articles on the other 3 battalions in the regiment. Someone else redirected it to the regimental article 319th Field Artillery Regiment. Please return the work that was done. -82redleg (talk) 06:18, 31 January 2014 (UTC)

 Done. This was not actually a deletion. Your series of edits included adding a link to Facebook. Those are normally discouraged, and there is a "bot", an automatic system, which is set to revert edits that introduce them; but in this case I think the link is allowable under the WP:ELOFFICIAL exception, so I have undone XLinkBot's reversion. JohnCD (talk) 10:33, 31 January 2014 (UTC)

Niharika Ray Baral

• Niharika ray baral · ( talk | logs | links | watch ) · [revisions]

It is an attempt to provide Odia literature lovers small information about modern Odia writers. I intend to create such small pages for a number of Odia writers and link them to the List of Odia writers page on wiki -Deepak Ranjan Patra (talk) 06:36, 31 January 2014 (UTC) Deepak Ranjan Patra (talk) 06:36, 31 January 2014 (UTC)

Comment from deleting admin: Wikipedia doesn't have articles for the purpose of providing a small population of enthusiasts with information about non-notable authors. An author must meet the criteria spelled out in WP:NOTABILITY and WP:AUTHOR before meriting an article on Wikipedia. If you think the subject merits an article, please work on a draft article in your own sandbox instead of main article space. ~Amatulić (talk) 08:32, 31 January 2014 (UTC)

 Not done. Please read the links Amatulic gives above, and also WP:Verifiability: "any material challenged or likely to be challenged must be attributed to a reliable, published source" and WP:No original research. It is good to publish information about little-known writers, but Wikipedia is not the place to do it, unless there is already significant coverage in reliable, independent, published secondary sources which can be summarised to make the article. Sources do not have to be in English, and they do not have to be on-line, but they must have been published so that they could be checked, they must be independent of the subject, and they must be reliable, i.e. from a source with editorial control, not blogs, fan-sites, Facebook etc. JohnCD (talk) 11:03, 31 January 2014 (UTC)

Mr. Lucci

• Mr. Lucci · ( talk | logs | history | links | watch ) · [revisions]

Mr. Lucci is of relevance because of the historical contributions he has made and still continues to make in the music industry. I gave verifiable links from Billboard, Amazon, allmusic and others. Nothing violated any copyrights and there was no promotion of things to come. If anything was questinable it would have been the film section, and that was do to non cite info at that very moment. But if thats your concern then I can delete that part. Thanks you It was originally deleted for promotion and irrelevance.— Preceding unsigned comment added by CandaceCollinsConnect (talk • contribs) 21:57, 30 January 2014 (UTC)

Y userfied to User:CandaceCollinsConnect/Mr. Lucci by Alexf. JohnCD (talk) 15:53, 31 January 2014 (UTC)

Charter Global

• Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Charter Global · ( logs | links | watch ) · [revisions]

49.206.238.64 (talk) 16:36, 31 January 2014 (UTC)

 Not done - this was a copyright violation, copied from the company's website and LinkedIn entry. Wikipedia cannot accept copied material without a formal copyright release, but in any case this material was quite unacceptable - an advertisement, not an encyclopedia article. Wikipedia is not a notice-board for companies to pin up copies of their promotional literature. JohnCD (talk) 17:49, 31 January 2014 (UTC)

Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Destined for Oblivion: As Nature Intended

• Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Destined for Oblivion: As Nature Intended · ( logs | links | watch ) · [revisions]

I, Lunar2155, request the undeletion of this Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please userfy or restore as appropriate. Newbie at editing in this site; haven't gone online for quite some time and would like to edit the article to meet Wikipedia quality standards Lunar2155 (talk) 18:05, 31 January 2014 (UTC)

Done - as an Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13, the page has been restored on request. Please edit the page to address the issues raised when it was declined, and re-submit it; "Articles for creation" is not for the indefinite hosting of material found to be unsuitable for inclusion in the encyclopedia. For advice, read WP:Your first article, WP:Notability (books), WP:NOTPLOT, WP:WAF. JohnCD (talk) 18:35, 31 January 2014 (UTC)

Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/North County Property Group

• Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/North County Property Group · ( logs | links | watch ) · [revisions]

Bobpreston2012 (talk) 17:21, 31 January 2014 (UTC)

Done - as an Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13, the page has been restored on request. Please edit the page to address the issues raised when it was declined, and re-submit it; "Articles for creation" is not for the indefinite hosting of material found to be unsuitable for inclusion in the encyclopedia. JohnCD (talk) 18:37, 31 January 2014 (UTC)

Jay Parpworth

• Jay Parpworth · ( talk | logs | links | watch ) · [revisions]

Enter your reasoning here and then click the "Save page" button below -Chloemimo (talk) 14:16, 31 January 2014 (UTC)

Not done - this article has not been restored because it does not appear to meet our guidelines for inclusion of articles about people. In general, Wikipedia considers a topic to be notable if there exist multiple reliable sources of information on the topic, external to the subject itself. Articles concerning people will be deleted on sight if they are considered to be unambiguous advertising or promotion, or if they do not contain a credible assertion of the significance of the subject. JohnCD (talk) 18:40, 31 January 2014 (UTC)

Russell Johnston (disambiguation)

• Russell Johnston (disambiguation) · ( talk | logs | history | links | watch ) · [revisions]

One administrator deleted it as mere dabpage with two entries. Then another administrator re-created it with more entries. Prior deleted revisions should still exist. -George Ho (talk) 01:23, 1 February 2014 (UTC)

• Done Graeme Bartlett (talk) 05:36, 1 February 2014 (UTC)

Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/The Dyad System

• Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/The Dyad System · ( logs | links | watch ) · [revisions]

I, Alnstern, request the undeletion of this Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please userfy or restore as appropriate. Alnstern (talk) 20:49, 31 January 2014 (UTC)

• Done - as an Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13, the page has been restored on request. Please edit the page to address the issues raised when it was declined, and re-submit it; "Articles for creation" is not for the indefinite hosting of material found to be unsuitable for inclusion in the encyclopedia. Graeme Bartlett (talk) 05:48, 1 February 2014 (UTC)

Alblessed Institute International

• Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Alblessed Institute International · ( logs | links | watch ) · [revisions]

I, 197.221.243.157, request the undeletion of this Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please userfy or restore as appropriate. 197.221.243.157 (talk) 20:52, 31 January 2014 (UTC)

• Done - as an Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13, the page has been restored on request. Please edit the page to address the issues raised when it was declined, and re-submit it; "Articles for creation" is not for the indefinite hosting of material found to be unsuitable for inclusion in the encyclopedia. You will need to find sources to get this as an article. Graeme Bartlett (talk) 05:51, 1 February 2014 (UTC)

American Conference on Diversity

• American Conference on Diversity · ( talk | logs | links | watch | afd ) · [revisions]

The organization is a reputable company with 65 years of work with corporate clients, institutions of higher education, and schools and other clients throughout the state of New Jersey. (It was formerly known as NCCJ-NJ, part of the National Conference for Community and Justice, founded in 1927)

It has been referenced by independent sources, including:

<Long list of references removed - it is not necessary to list them here when requesting PROD undeletion.>

— Preceding unsigned comment added by Tuber990 (talk • contribs) 08:06, 1 February 2014 (UTC)

Done - as a contested proposed deletion, the article has been restored on request. I will notify user JzG (talk), who proposed it, and who may choose to nominate it at WP:Articles for deletion, which would start a debate lasting seven days, to which you would be welcome to contribute. JohnCD (talk) 09:27, 1 February 2014 (UTC)

The Welsh Quilt Centre

• Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/The Welsh Quilt Centre · ( logs | links | watch ) · [revisions]

195.2.132.108 (talk) 07:31, 1 February 2014 (UTC)

Done - as an Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13, the page has been restored on request. Please edit the page to address the issues raised when it was declined, and re-submit it; "Articles for creation" is not for the indefinite hosting of material found to be unsuitable for inclusion in the encyclopedia.. Read WP:Your first article for advice, and note the need for references to significant coverage in reliable, independent secondary sources to establish Wikipedia:Notability. JohnCD (talk) 09:41, 1 February 2014 (UTC)

Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Scrumwise

• Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Scrumwise · ( logs | links | watch ) · [revisions]

I, Esben Krag Hansen, request the undeletion of this Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please userfy or restore as appropriate. Esben Krag Hansen (talk) 13:36, 1 February 2014 (UTC)

• Done - as an Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13, the page has been restored on request. Please edit the page to address the issues raised when it was declined, and re-submit it; "Articles for creation" is not for the indefinite hosting of material found to be unsuitable for inclusion in the encyclopedia. DP 13:41, 1 February 2014 (UTC)

WIML Wojskowy Instytut Medycyny Lotniczej (Military Institute for Aviation Medicine)

89.74.141.105 (talk) 18:46, 1 February 2014 (UTC)

 Question: please give the exact title of the page you mean. I have tried the title above, and many variations, but I have not found it. Capitalization is significant, and so are special characters like Ś. If you have a page with a reference to it, it would be best to copy and paste from there. JohnCD (talk) 21:25, 1 February 2014 (UTC)

File:T-Com Prva HNL.png

• File:T-Com Prva HNL.png · ( talk | logs | links | watch ) · [revisions]

I uploading logos on the site of the seasons of the league -Jolicnikola (talk) 14:16, 1 February 2014 (UTC)

 Done. Please add the necessary FUR (see Wikipedia:Non-free use rationale guideline) or it may be deleted again. JohnCD (talk) 21:33, 1 February 2014 (UTC)

DroidMsg

• DroidMsg · ( talk | logs | links | watch | afd ) · [revisions]

This page shouldn't be deleted because it is a free dating site. -Mikeme356 (talk) 05:01, 2 February 2014 (UTC)

Done - as a contested proposed deletion, the article has been restored on request. I will notify user JamesBWatson (talk), who proposed it, and who may choose to nominate it at WP:Articles for deletion, which would start a debate lasting seven days, to which you would be welcome to contribute. Just being a free dating site is not enough to have a Wikipedia article: it needs references showing significant coverage in reliable, independent secondary sources to establish Wikipedia:Notability. JohnCD (talk) 10:43, 2 February 2014 (UTC)

Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Connecticut Valley Arms (CVA)

• Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Connecticut Valley Arms (CVA) · ( logs | links | watch ) · [revisions]

I, Simontheyellowcat, request the undeletion of this Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please userfy or restore as appropriate. Simontheyellowcat (talk) 16:06, 1 February 2014 (UTC)

Done - as an Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13, the page has been restored on request. Please edit the page to address the issues raised when it was declined, and re-submit it; "Articles for creation" is not for the indefinite hosting of material found to be unsuitable for inclusion in the encyclopedia. JohnCD (talk) 10:50, 2 February 2014 (UTC)

Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Qeuyl

• Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Qeuyl · ( logs | links | watch ) · [revisions]

I, Fnf1044, request the undeletion of this Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please userfy or restore as appropriate. Fnf1044 (talk) 16:42, 1 February 2014 (UTC)

Done - as an Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13, the page has been restored on request. Please edit the page to address the issues raised when it was declined, and re-submit it; "Articles for creation" is not for the indefinite hosting of material found to be unsuitable for inclusion in the encyclopedia. See WP:Your first article for general advice, and WP:MUSICBIO for the notability standard for musical performers. JohnCD (talk) 10:56, 2 February 2014 (UTC)