Wikipedia

Wikipedia:Requests for undeletion/Archive 124

< Wikipedia:Requests for undeletion
Latest comment: 10 years ago by Graeme Bartlett in topic Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Counterfire
Archive 120←Archive 122Archive 123Archive 124Archive 125Archive 126→Archive 130

Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/R S Mani

Latest comment: 10 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

I, Kansal15, request the undeletion of this Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page as I intend to work on it. kansal 15:53, 21 March 2014 (UTC)

  Done, the article is restored for you to continue working on it. ~Amatulić (talk) 20:20, 21 March 2014 (UTC)

NERA Economic Consulting

Latest comment: 10 years ago3 comments3 people in discussion

NERA Economic Consulting is generally considered the top economic consulting firm in the world. It has been ranked as the number 1 firm for economic consulting by Vault.com from 2009-2014 -205.156.160.129 (talk) 22:50, 20 March 2014 (UTC)

NOT DONE It was deleted only as WP:PROD, and could normally have been undeleted on request, but I consider it subject to speedy deletion as hopelessly promotional .
As for notability, I see from the article it is "one of the three entities of Oliver Wyman Group, which is a subsidiary of Marsh & McLennan Companies," It probably is notable , but it needs proof of this, but our usual method: references providing substantial coverage from 3rd party independent published reliable sources, print or online, but not blogs or press releases, or material derived from press releases. There were no such references: merely the ranking from a career intelligence web site, and its own wen page.
As for promotionalism , the article consists ofa paragraph of description mixed with puffery and unsupported adjectives of praise, a list of the routine services they offer, a list of offices, and a list of competitors. The first paragraph belongs nowhere unless rewritten from scratch, and the 2nd and 3rd belong only on their own website' the list of competitors is repeated in the lede & the text and really belongs as a category--the way it's used is as advertising that this firm is better than they are . Multiple efforts over time to clean up this article have failed, and the only practical course is to start over--by someone without COI. I think it's safe to assume any editor writing arrant puffery has a COI DGG ( talk ) 05:59, 21 March 2014 (UTC)
Note: article was re-created, and is currently under discussion at AFD. ~Amatulić (talk) 20:23, 21 March 2014 (UTC)

Template:Wrestling Pay-per-views

Latest comment: 10 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

Incorrectly deleted. Deleter cited similarity with two templates that had completely different uses. If the template isn't up to standard, can I at least have the original source back, so I can make improvements. Thanks! -Paradox295 (talk) 11:40, 22 March 2014 (UTC)

Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/David Ashby

Latest comment: 10 years ago3 comments3 people in discussion

I, Andreas Polo, request the undeletion of this Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page as I intend to work on it. Andreas Polo (talk) 12:29, 22 March 2014 (UTC) Enter your reasoning here and then click the "Save page" button below -Andreas Polo (talk) 12:30, 22 March 2014 (UTC) It was deleted uncontroversally, although it's content has become of public interest since it refers to a person who is becoming more prominent.

  Comment: I merged two requests here, there is indeed a deleted AFC submission and an established article in mainspace with the same title. Not sure if the AFC was about the same person. §FreeRangeFrogcroak 20:10, 22 March 2014 (UTC)
  Done. They are two different people (the existing one is a politician, and the AFC one is a football coach), so the articles will need disambiguation titles if they will eventually exist in article space. ~Amatulić (talk) 22:31, 22 March 2014 (UTC)

Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Care Groups (Community Health)

Latest comment: 10 years ago3 comments2 people in discussion

(This user used the preload form for AFC undeletion, but did not specify the name of the AFC draft they would like undeleted. Consider checking their deleted contributions.) 71.76.224.184 (talk) 16:29, 22 March 2014 (UTC)

  Please repair your request - we cannot process malformed requests. Please use the code {{subst:refund|pageName|reasoning}} (replacing pagename with the name of the page you wish to have restored and reasoning with the reason for your request). There is no deleted article or AfC draft called Care Groups (Community Health) which could be restored. If you created the page using another IP address or account name, let me know and I can search for it. EdJohnston (talk) 17:28, 22 March 2014 (UTC)
  Done – To avoid further deletion processes, please go ahead with your planned improvements to this draft. Thanks, EdJohnston (talk) 02:05, 23 March 2014 (UTC)

WT:Articles for creation/Denes Agay

Latest comment: 10 years ago3 comments2 people in discussion

I, Cecilieaux, request the undeletion of this Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page as I intend to work on it. Cecilieaux (talk) 14:50, 22 March 2014 (UTC)

You must be referring to Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/dagay. I see no objection to undoing the G13, but if the draft is restored it should be under a more suitable name such as Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Denes Agay. This composer appears notable. See his 2007 obituary in the LA Times. EdJohnston (talk) 17:15, 22 March 2014 (UTC)
  Done – I restored the draft article and moved it to WT:Articles for creation/Denes Agay. Please try to make at least one edit to the article in the next week or so to avoid the deletion happening again. Thanks, EdJohnston (talk) 02:13, 23 March 2014 (UTC)

Hypertext Application Language

Latest comment: 10 years ago9 comments7 people in discussion

The page describe a convention for API's XML/JSON documents and is an IETF draft. The promotional flagging is a false claim as the article was referencing the language specification and no mention of a company name was done on the article. Also a similar convention called JSON-LD exists in wikipedia and Drupal project switch from JSON-LD to HAL - - lyhana8 (Talk) 09:00, 19 March 2014 (UTC)

  Note: The page was speedily-deleted under criterion G11. Pages deleted under that criterion are generally not undeleted because they require complete rewrites to be viable encyclopedia articles or because they violate our biographical or fair-use policies. A page doesn't have to reference or mention a company to be promotional; glowing language and corporate buzzwords have no place in an article. See WP:Neutral point of view (parent policy) and WP:Other stuff exists. —Jeremy v^_^v Bori! 09:37, 19 March 2014 (UTC)
The article was a sales pitch addressing the user in the second person, telling them why they should implement HAL in "your API". It was nowhere near an encyclopedic article. QVVERTYVS (hm?) 10:15, 19 March 2014 (UTC)
  Not done "Adopting HAL will make your API explorable... will make your API easier to work with and therefore more attractive to client developers" - as Qwertyus says, that's a sales pitch, not an encyclopedia article. An article should be written from a WP:Neutral point of view, and also should show references to "significant coverage in reliable sources that are independent of the subject" to establish WP:Notability. JohnCD (talk) 10:46, 19 March 2014 (UTC)
My bad, being a work in progress I didn't expect a fast deletion. And yes I copy/paste content directly from the spec and didn't notice or remove the commercial tone. Again after such a short time I find it a bit harsh as I usually call to the community (via twitter) to help complete stubs I create and come back few days later to add info (e.g. ). So IMHO, a request for improvement or a stub banner would be a better compromise than a fast track deletion.
Is it possible to get access to the content of the article as it was before deletion so I can work on it ? — Preceding unsigned comment added by Lyhana8 (talk • contribs) 14:26, 19 March 2014 (UTC)
You "copy/paste content directly from the spec"? That's a copyright violation, and a reason for immediate deletion. The bulk of the article seems to be copied. If you want a copy, I suggest you start with your source material. ~Amatulić (talk) 15:40, 19 March 2014 (UTC)
What licensing info do I need to add to the site/spec to make the content viable for re-use on wikipedia? Mike Kelly 16:00, 19 March 2014 (UTC) — Preceding unsigned comment added by 109.231.193.164 (talk)
See WP:Donating copyrighted materials; but that is seldom worth doing because, as in this case, material written for other purposes usually has a promotional tone unsuitable for an encyclopedia. Wikipedia is not a noticeboard for companies to pin up copies of their product literature. JohnCD (talk) 18:31, 19 March 2014 (UTC)
IETF docs are released under a permissive license that might be compatible with the GFDL - but it's probably better to just paraphrase from them than to paste verbatim in any case. Especially if it's unclear if the draft falls under their license and sounds promotional to begin with. §FreeRangeFrogcroak 04:49, 21 March 2014 (UTC)
@JohnCD: Go slowly with the "pin up advertissement" point. Best practices do increase accessibility, so vocabulary will be positive, Lyhan8 is an Web Ergonomy Engineer, involved within GNU/Linux communities for years. Writing back abstract of relevant technologies/tools you meet is a good wikipedian behavior. It should be encouraged, not discarded. If shape is not perfect, help around, guide him to get a suitable work. Userfy the page is a polite and respectful middleground to manage a work in progress. Please send the last version of wiki-text to the user. Yug (talk) 06:57, 23 March 2014 (UTC)

Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/David Kaonohiokala Bray

Latest comment: 10 years ago2 comments2 people in discussion

I, Shieldwolf, request the undeletion of this Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page as I intend to work on it. RandNoel (talk) 06:46, 23 March 2014 (UTC)

  Not done - there is no need to undelete this AfC submission, because the article exists in the main encyclopedia at David Kaonohiokala Bray. JohnCD (talk) 10:55, 23 March 2014 (UTC)

User:Rockspeter60/Kwabufu

Latest comment: 10 years ago2 comments2 people in discussion

196.0.4.86 (talk) 10:16, 23 March 2014 (UTC)

  Not done. This is the English-language Wikipedia, and contributions must be in English. JohnCD (talk) 11:08, 23 March 2014 (UTC)

Veerendra Senar (3)

Latest comment: 10 years ago2 comments2 people in discussion

this article real person, biographical living person, i add realble source -183.87.209.214 (talk) 08:17, 23 March 2014 (UTC)

  Not done, see WP:REFUND#Veerendra Senar (2) above. JohnCD (talk) 11:11, 23 March 2014 (UTC)

Enzon Pharmaceuticals

Latest comment: 10 years ago2 comments2 people in discussion

This page is included in a student education project, and the course page is https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User:Uttsinghuajoint2014/Course_Page .Since it was deleted for Expired PROD, I sincerely request for undeletion, so I can improve it. Thanks a lot! -Kekoukele (talk) 14:51, 22 March 2014 (UTC)

  Done - as a contested proposed deletion, the article has been restored on request. I will notify user Kudpung (talk), who proposed it, and who may choose to nominate it at WP:Articles for deletion, which would start a debate lasting seven days, to which you would be welcome to contribute. JohnCD (talk) 11:56, 23 March 2014 (UTC)

Niraj Chag

Latest comment: 10 years ago2 comments2 people in discussion

page is accurate -86.27.244.186 (talk) 20:02, 22 March 2014 (UTC)

  Done - as a contested proposed deletion, the article has been restored on request. It may be accurate, but most of the references are to his own site: it needs references showing "significant coverage in reliable sources that are independent of the subject" to show how he meets WP:MUSICBIO. JohnCD (talk) 12:46, 23 March 2014 (UTC)

Tristan Jarry

Latest comment: 10 years ago2 comments2 people in discussion

Contest PROD. WHL First Team All-Star meets WP:NHOCKEY criteria #4. -Dolovis (talk) 05:08, 23 March 2014 (UTC)

  Done - as a contested proposed deletion, the article has been restored on request. I will notify user Djsasso (talk), who proposed it, and who may choose to nominate it at WP:Articles for deletion, which would start a debate lasting seven days, to which you would be welcome to contribute. JohnCD (talk) 14:41, 23 March 2014 (UTC)

Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/WarLess Dental Procedure

Latest comment: 10 years ago2 comments2 people in discussion

I, 84.235.50.245, request the undeletion of this Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page as I intend to work on it. 84.235.50.245 (talk) 05:10, 23 March 2014 (UTC)

  Done - as an Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13, the page has been restored on request. Please edit the page to address the issues raised when it was declined, and re-submit it; "Articles for creation" is not for the indefinite hosting of material found to be unsuitable for inclusion in the encyclopedia. JohnCD (talk) 14:55, 23 March 2014 (UTC)

The ReFeRe

Latest comment: 10 years ago3 comments3 people in discussion

I, 81.51.10.175, request the undeletion of this Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page as I intend to work on it. I dont understand why it is so difficult to publish "Te ReFeRe". It is the English translation of La_ReFeRe fr:La_ReFeRe. Thanks. A.F. <email redacted> -81.51.10.175 (talk) 07:15, 23 March 2014 (UTC)

  •   Comment: It may be "so difficult to publish" because the English Wikipedia has extremely strict notability guidelines, and someone's scale-model railroad project based on their own imaginary world is extremely far from those guidelines DP 12:53, 23 March 2014 (UTC)
  Done - as an Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13, the page has been restored on request. Please edit the page to address the issues raised when it was declined, and re-submit it; "Articles for creation" is not for the indefinite hosting of material found to be unsuitable for inclusion in the encyclopedia. As DP says, the notability requirement is for references showing "significant coverage in reliable sources that are independent of the subject". References to Wikipedia are not reliable, and the subject's website or articles and books by its creator are not independent. JohnCD (talk) 16:43, 23 March 2014 (UTC)

Hedgewars

Latest comment: 10 years ago4 comments2 people in discussion

I would like to export it to wikia:gaming. -Matthias M. (talk) 13:06, 23 March 2014 (UTC)

  Done - text emailed to you. I am not sure what needs to be done in this situation about CC-BY-SA attribution, but I have enquired and will let you know. JohnCD (talk) 14:53, 23 March 2014 (UTC)
Special:Export/Hedgewars with full revision would have been better than just a copy & paste of the wiki text, but this is okay I guess. Thanks Matthias M. (talk) 15:05, 23 March 2014 (UTC)
@Matthias M.: the answer to attribution is, append somehow a copy of the list of authors. I was going to email you a text copy of the article history. I can do Special:Export if you would prefer: if we export the history with all 200+ revisions, I guess that would deal with the attribution problem. Let me know. JohnCD (talk) 16:52, 23 March 2014 (UTC)

Principle 6 campaign

Latest comment: 10 years ago2 comments2 people in discussion

Notable topic, did have substantial edits by others (invalid G5) -ViperSnake151  Talk  17:15, 23 March 2014 (UTC)

  Not done. No, there were no substantial edits by others: the four edits by others were (a) removal of a template (promptly reverted), (b) a null edit to fix a redlink, (c) addition of a category and (d) addition of the G5 speedy tag. JohnCD (talk) 17:29, 23 March 2014 (UTC)

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/5pm

Latest comment: 10 years ago5 comments3 people in discussion

The article is about a legit product that is widely known in its domain and has been around for 6+ years. The article itself was 4-5 years old, with multiple contributors updating it. It looks like a targeted speedy deletion for no specific reason, as there are many products in the same area (project management) with less notoriety present on Wikipedia. If something in the article is not correct or has to be edited - that is a different subject, and the community can work on it. But speedy deletion is not a way to deal with old legit articles. -76.182.87.119 (talk) 16:26, 16 March 2014 (UTC)

  Note: The page was speedily-deleted under criterion G11. Pages deleted under that criterion are generally not undeleted because they require complete rewrites to be viable encyclopedia articles or because they violate our biographical or fair-use policies. A G11 speedy means that the article was clearly promotional and would need a total rewrite to be a viable Wikipedia article. Note that the existence of articles covering similar topics is not a valid reason for inclusion. —Jeremy v^_^v Bori! 18:44, 16 March 2014 (UTC)
That comment was unhelpful Jeremy. I have examined the article and it was not falling into the G11 category. Graeme Bartlett (talk) 10:14, 17 March 2014 (UTC)
You forget, Graeme, I don't have admin tools and thus can't see deleted revisions. My comment above is based off of whatever information I know or can reasonably surmise given the situation. —Jeremy v^_^v Bori! 21:43, 18 March 2014 (UTC)
  Done I have left the unbalanced tag but it was not spammy in tone. Do not turn it into an ad. Graeme Bartlett (talk) 20:07, 23 March 2014 (UTC)

FOSSASIA

Latest comment: 10 years ago2 comments2 people in discussion

Articled was deleted in 2010, a year after this conference began, due to "no evidence of notability". Since then, the conference has become a large-scale annual event, with some notable press coverage. -Yaron K. (talk) 19:04, 23 March 2014 (UTC)

Codendi (software)

Latest comment: 10 years ago2 comments2 people in discussion

Codendi is a popular project management tool and application lifecycle management tool, similar to redmine, collabnet etc. and as such IMHO requires its own page like others with identical function.

This is needed so that it can be included in the various comparison tables that exist to trade off such tools. Without the page, the tool cannot be compared with others.

I do not understand why this page was deleted and an identical tools like collabnet, redmine etc. were not. If I did understand I would fix it.

Further there is a page on the French wikipedia as https://fr.wikipedia.org/wiki/Codendi so why can we not have an english translation of that?

I have no affiliation with Codendi whatsoever. I am an expert in this field, and can provide my credentials on request. -Nrbray (talk) 19:24, 23 March 2014 (UTC)

  •   Done out of scope for A7, but there is still no claim of importance, and no multiple independent references to show notability. French Wikipedia does not count as a reliable source, and no help for notability. Graeme Bartlett (talk) 21:05, 23 March 2014 (UTC)

Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/El Eels

Latest comment: 10 years ago2 comments2 people in discussion

I, Thrillos21, request the undeletion of this Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page as I intend to work on it. Page will be edited and enhanced -Thrillos21 (talk) 21:39, 23 March 2014 (UTC)

  Done - as an Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13, the page has been restored on request. Please edit the page to address the issues raised when it was declined, and re-submit it; "Articles for creation" is not for the indefinite hosting of material found to be unsuitable for inclusion in the encyclopedia. JohnCD (talk) 11:17, 24 March 2014 (UTC)

Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Ella E. McBride

Latest comment: 10 years ago2 comments2 people in discussion

I, Djembayz, request the undeletion of this Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page as I intend to work on it. Djembayz (talk) 00:45, 24 March 2014 (UTC)

  Done - @Djembayz: as an Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13, the page has been restored on request. Please edit the page to address the issues raised when it was declined, and re-submit it; "Articles for creation" is not for the indefinite hosting of material found to be unsuitable for inclusion in the encyclopedia.--Fuhghettaboutit (talk) 12:17, 24 March 2014 (UTC)

Revista Living

Latest comment: 10 years ago2 comments2 people in discussion

Enter your reasoning here and then click the "Save page" button below -Eralda1111 (talk) 11:36, 24 March 2014 (UTC)

  Not done and will not be done. @Eralda1111: This was a blatant copyright violation of this website's content (and even if it wasn't, this would not be suitable content for restoration both as advertising material and as a page that was deleted on a basis where undeletion would not be uncontroversial).--Fuhghettaboutit (talk) 12:34, 24 March 2014 (UTC)

Adrian Newman (producer)

Latest comment: 10 years ago3 comments3 people in discussion

Enter your reasoning here and then click the "Save page" button below -144.136.172.64 (talk) 05:48, 22 March 2014 (UTC) It was deleted uncontroversally, although it's content has become of public interest since it refers to a person who is becoming more prominent.

  Done - as a contested proposed deletion, the article has been restored on request. I will notify user Bearian (talk), who proposed it, and who may choose to nominate it at WP:Articles for deletion, which would start a debate lasting seven days, to which you would be welcome to contribute. The PROD nomination said: "Producers are not automatically notable. They do not inherit notability from working with famous people." JohnCD (talk) 12:17, 23 March 2014 (UTC)
No problem, thanks for the courtesy! Bearian (talk) 14:12, 24 March 2014 (UTC)

Reema Debnath

Latest comment: 10 years ago2 comments2 people in discussion

The reasoning for deletion of this page is not appropriate. Both the sources "The Shillong Times" and "Mumbai Mirror" are major news publication group in India. An article published in these newspapers should not get deleted. -Debnathmallika (talk) 14:36, 24 March 2014 (UTC)

  Comment:: this article has not been deleted. Deletion is being discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Reema Debnath, and that is where you should comment, but read WP:NACTOR and WP:DISCUSSAFD first. JohnCD (talk) 14:55, 24 March 2014 (UTC)

tangemeenie

Latest comment: 10 years ago2 comments2 people in discussion

Tangemeenie's first album was distributed by a major music distributor, Allegro Music (cite: http://www.allegro-music.com/online_catalog.asp?sku_tag=AMW323), the group received significant amounts of college radio airplay and performed at notable events including the 2002 CMJ New Music Showcase; there are many entries for groups that accomplished less -72.236.65.232 (talk) 15:08, 24 March 2014 (UTC)

Question: Exactly what criteria in WP:BAND does this band meet? It isn't worth restoring if it wouldn't survive WP:AFD. ~Amatulić (talk) 18:50, 24 March 2014 (UTC)

Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Borriello Brothers Real New York Pizza

Latest comment: 10 years ago2 comments2 people in discussion

I, 2601:1:9700:4B3:34C9:C4D0:C2C:662A, request the undeletion of this Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page as I intend to work on it. There are more details to be entered on the page to be resubmitted for approval 2601:1:9700:4B3:34C9:C4D0:C2C:662A (talk) 01:37, 24 March 2014 (UTC)

  Done. Restored so you can continue to work on it. Good luck. ~Amatulić (talk) 18:52, 24 March 2014 (UTC)

Beach Bunny Swimwear

Latest comment: 10 years ago3 comments3 people in discussion

Please restore the page so it can go through a full AfD ---evrik (talk) 15:40, 24 March 2014 (UTC)

  Not done. From the instructions at the head of this page: "If you feel an administrator has erred... in applying a speedy deletion criterion, please contact them directly. If you discuss but are unable to resolve the issue on their talk page, it should be raised at Wikipedia:Deletion review, rather than here." Ask Cindamuse (talk). JohnCD (talk) 17:19, 24 March 2014 (UTC)
To clarify what JohnCD said above, A7 speedy deletions cannot be overturned here. —Jeremy v^_^v Bori! 19:23, 24 March 2014 (UTC)

Thomas H. Keating

Latest comment: 10 years ago2 comments2 people in discussion

There is no clear way to contact Edgar the admin. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Carrboro (talk • contribs) 01:40, 25 March 2014 (UTC)

@Carrboro, Edgar181, Katrinamoris2014: Sure there is. The most direct way is to post to his talk page. Every user has a talk page just like you do, and you've probably noticed that when someone posts there you get a big honking orange light at the top of the page telling you that occurred; Edgar would get the same thing if you posted to his. But you don't need to because I have pinged him at the beginning of this post, just as I've pinged you (which should result in a red notification right next to your name at the top of the page, to draw you here). Anyway, the article was deleted for lack of content and it did technically meet that criterion, although the article was hastily tagged and should not have been. Nevertheless, there is nothing to restore here as the entire content of the article consisted of one external link. But it does looks like a worthy topic as there seems to be plenty of reliable sources from which a verifiable article could be written. So, what I suggest is that you create the article in a sandbox in your user space. I suggest at User:Carrboro/Thomas H. Keating. You have much greater latitude to work on such an article at your leisure while it is in a sandbox. When you are ready, you can submit it for review at Articles for Creation by placing at the top {{subst:submit}}. I suggest before doing any of that you take a tour through the Wikipedia:Tutorial. Best regards--Fuhghettaboutit (talk) 04:30, 25 March 2014 (UTC)

Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Swami Shree Haridas Ji

Latest comment: 10 years ago3 comments2 people in discussion

I, Aashishji, request the undeletion of this Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page as I intend to work on it. Aashishji (talk) 11:35, 25 March 2014 (UTC)

  Not done. This is as close to pure promotion as I've ever seen. As such it would be properly deleted under section g11 of the criteria for speedy deletion as blatant advertising, even as a draft where we give more leeway for development. As a side note, I cannot check because the page is returning an error but a search indicates it may by a copyright violation of the text at the facebook page on this individual, though it could be backwards copying.--Fuhghettaboutit (talk) 12:35, 25 March 2014 (UTC)
Ah, I see you cited the facebook, making it fairly clear it came first. Please note that you may not copy and paste previously written material (except for short quotes, inside of quotation marks) and this would have also been subject to deletion as a copyright violation under section g12 of the criteria for speedy deletion.--Fuhghettaboutit (talk) 13:15, 25 March 2014 (UTC)

Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/The Reporter and The Girl

Latest comment: 10 years ago2 comments2 people in discussion

I, Reporterandthegirl, request the undeletion of this Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page as I intend to work on it. Reporterandthegirl (talk) 22:52, 23 March 2014 (UTC)

  Done - as an Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13, the page has been restored on request. Please edit the page to address the issues raised when it was declined, and re-submit it; "Articles for creation" is not for the indefinite hosting of material found to be unsuitable for inclusion in the encyclopedia. JohnCD (talk) 18:01, 25 March 2014 (UTC)

Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/SoRave.com

Latest comment: 10 years ago2 comments2 people in discussion

72.239.83.7 (talk) 12:48, 24 March 2014 (UTC)

  Done - as an Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13, the page has been restored on request. Please edit the page to address the issues raised when it was declined, and re-submit it; "Articles for creation" is not for the indefinite hosting of material found to be unsuitable for inclusion in the encyclopedia. JohnCD (talk) 18:03, 25 March 2014 (UTC)

Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Triqueta

Latest comment: 10 years ago2 comments2 people in discussion

I, StuartGP, request the undeletion of this Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page as I intend to work on it. StuartGP (talk) 16:07, 24 March 2014 (UTC)

  Done - as an Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13, the page has been restored on request. Please edit the page to address the issues raised when it was declined, and re-submit it; "Articles for creation" is not for the indefinite hosting of material found to be unsuitable for inclusion in the encyclopedia. JohnCD (talk) 18:24, 25 March 2014 (UTC)

Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Washington State Pharmacy Association

Latest comment: 10 years ago2 comments2 people in discussion

I, SteveDErickson, request the undeletion of this Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page as I intend to work on it. SteveDErickson (talk) 20:33, 24 March 2014 (UTC)

  Done - as an Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13, the page has been restored on request. Please edit the page to address the issues raised when it was declined, and re-submit it; "Articles for creation" is not for the indefinite hosting of material found to be unsuitable for inclusion in the encyclopedia. JohnCD (talk) 18:27, 25 March 2014 (UTC)

Shorenstein Center on Media, Politics and Public Policy

Latest comment: 10 years ago3 comments3 people in discussion

Enter your reasoning here and then click the "Save page" button below -Leightonwalter (talk) 01:35, 25 March 2014 (UTC)

I created the page Shorenstein Center on Media, Politics and Public Policy to reflect the new name of the Joan Shorenstein Center on the Press, Politics and Public Policy. The center changed its name earlier this year (2014), and I created the new page based on the old one, moved over the content, and put in a referral tag. While my process for doing the name change was perhaps not ideal, the tagging of the new page for "speedy deletion" was completely inappropriate. The Shorenstein Center is *not* a commercial enterprise, and under its old name was in Wikipedia for many years. The Shorenstein Center is a nonprofit, educational institution that has been part of Harvard University and the Harvard Kennedy School since 1986. It is the foremost center for discussions of the media, press and politics in the United States, and hosts some of the most important figures in politics, academia, and journalism in the world -- current Senator Al Franken is a former fellow, for example. It is the very essence of significant and very much deserves to be in Wikipedia. Thanks in advance for your consideration. I would appreciate this page being restored as soon as possible.

Please note that the Joan Shorenstein Center on the Press, Politics and Public Policy should be restored as well. It should refer visitors to the center's new page.

If you wish to change the name of a page, then use the "Move" command at the top of the article. Do not cut and paste the contents into a new article. See Wikipedia:Moving a page for details. I've restored the original article. If you feel the name should be changed, please follow the instructions on that page and feel free to ask me if you need assistance. Gamaliel (talk) 03:55, 25 March 2014 (UTC)

Many thanks. I appreciate your assistance. I tried for some time to figure out the "move" instructions, but wasn't able to. I will look at them again.

All seems to be sorted out. JohnCD (talk) 18:29, 25 March 2014 (UTC)

ShopYourWay

Latest comment: 10 years ago3 comments2 people in discussion

Article was under construction. The subject is indeed significant enough for Wikipedia, as far as press exposure and number of registered users go. If not undelete it, please send me the deleted content. -Seithat (talk) 21:32, 24 March 2014 (UTC)

  Userfied - the page has been restored to the userspace at User:Seithat/ShopYourWay. You may work on improving the article's assertion of notability at its new location, but please contact RHaworth (talk · contribs), the administrator who deleted the page, before moving it back to the article space. Please see the criteria for speedy deletion and the relevant notability guidelines - articles that are not in compliance will be deleted. Raed WP:Your first article for advice. JohnCD (talk) 18:20, 25 March 2014 (UTC)
Thanks! Seithat (talk) 19:21, 25 March 2014 (UTC)

Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Erick Rono

Latest comment: 10 years ago2 comments2 people in discussion

I, Erono, request the undeletion of this Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page as I intend to work on it. Erono (talk) 12:27, 25 March 2014 (UTC)

Erick Rono is currently the Chief Accountant of Agriflora Kenya Limited

Have you read Wikipedia:Autobiographies? Did you know that you shouldn't be writing articles about yourself? The article you wrote about yourself looks quite promotional and fails to establish notability as defined by Wikipedia:Notability and Wikipedia:Notability (people). ~Amatulić (talk) 21:07, 25 March 2014 (UTC)

Haute Tanning

Latest comment: 10 years ago2 comments2 people in discussion

I had just started the page and need more time to gather more information. It was not finished yet. — Preceding unsigned comment added by MLeeS19 (talk • contribs) 13:29, 25 March 2014 (UTC)

  Not done. Then start it at Wikipedia:Articles for creation. Since it was deleted in accordance with WP:CSD#A7 it doesn't qualify for undeletion by request. Besides, it isn't worth restoring. What you wrote is just one line with unacceptable references to Facebook and the company's own web site. Please read WP:CORP carefully to understand the inclusion criteria for companies, and if you think the company is notable for inclusion in Wikipedia, submit your article through Wikipedia:Articles for creation. ~Amatulić (talk) 21:11, 25 March 2014 (UTC)

RGB Networks

Latest comment: 10 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

We request the restoration of the RGB Networks page (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/RGB_Networks). The editor "Y" has deleted this page 3 times, each time we have revised the page but received no other comment as to the rationale other than a category. Twice Y deleted the page for "unambiguous advertising or promotion," but we dispute this claim. RGB Networks is a company that is a very important player in broadcast technology. All information on that page, with the exception of the investors and locations of offices, had specific citations from major industry or business news publications; it referred to the Wikipedia pages of all relevant technologies; it referred to the Wikipedia pages of competitors (in one instance when the competitor did not have a page, it referred to the competitor's website directly). The tone of the copy was very non-promotional, particularly when contrasted to each of the competitors' Wikipedia pages to which this page linked. If this page does not conform to Wikipedia content politices, we would like to understand what specific text is in question so that we can amend it and bring the page into compliance. It is patently unfair to exclude one player -- the one with the biggest market share -- in an industry, yet allow all its competitors to have pages. I hope you will help us in fixing problems so that we can bring our page into compliance. -John Sidline 16:48, 25 March 2014 (UTC)

  Not done... and yet, you created the article solely for publicity purposes. Wikipedia is not a publicity channel, and should never be used as such. Because you have a conflict of interest (read and understand WP:COI carefully, please), you are hardly in any position to dispute that its purpose was promotional, regardless of its tone. This isn't about fairness, it's about behavior.
Because you have a conflict of interest, your best approach is to submit your article through the Wikipedia:Articles for creation process, and be sure you disclose your conflict of interest on your user page. ~Amatulić (talk) 21:19, 25 March 2014 (UTC)

Pharmaceutical Association Of Mauritius

Latest comment: 10 years ago2 comments2 people in discussion

the Pharmaceutical Association of Mauritius is listed as all other pharmacy associations in the list of Pharmacy Association of Wikipedia and being myself the vice president of the association I created this page to describe the association as all other pharmacy associations do, however I wanted to add the logo of the association but could not achieve this -Alshera (talk) 19:56, 25 March 2014 (UTC)

  Not done. Because the article was deleted in accordance with WP:CSD#A7, it cannot be restored by request here. Furthermore, because you have a clear conflict of interest (see WP:COI and read it carefully), your best approach is to submit your article through the Wikipedia:Articles for creation process where it can be reviewed by a neutral reviewer more familiar with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines, for suitability in Wikipedia. ~Amatulić (talk) 21:39, 25 March 2014 (UTC)

Bhumihar Brahmin

Latest comment: 10 years ago2 comments2 people in discussion

A group of Shudra( A social classes, of India, traditionally labourers, cleaners, maids etc) are trying to delete Bhumihar Brahmin (A social classes, of India, highest spiritual knowledge) article, just because in past indian history bhumihar brahmin abused Shudra's. Thats why in current day, shudra wants to take revenge from them -192.8.193.101 (talk) 06:58, 26 March 2014 (UTC)

  This page has not yet been deleted. Please visit the page to find out how to object to the deletion request. --Mdann52talk to me! 08:20, 26 March 2014 (UTC)

Lokesh Bharani M N

Latest comment: 10 years ago2 comments2 people in discussion

Enter your reasoning here and then click the "Save page" button below -Bharani12 (talk) 06:52, 26 March 2014 (UTC)

  This page has not yet been deleted. Please visit the page to find out how to object to the deletion request. (non-admin closure) --Mdann52talk to me! 08:25, 26 March 2014 (UTC)

Zayo Group

Latest comment: 10 years ago2 comments2 people in discussion

This is not an advertisement. This is to provide information about a company, not intended for advertising or promotional purposes. This was mistakenly deleted. — Preceding unsigned comment added by ChristinaIpavec (talk • contribs) 22:16, 25 March 2014 (UTC)

  Not done. The deleting administrator, Jimfbleak (talk), has "userfied" it to User:ChristinaIpavec/sandbox for you to work on. Check with him before restoring it to the main encyclopedia. As you wrote "we are a business...", you should read the Wikipedia:Plain and simple conflict of interest guide. JohnCD (talk) 11:28, 26 March 2014 (UTC)

Koji Oishi

Latest comment: 10 years ago2 comments2 people in discussion

It was deleted because the fighter did not meet WP:NMMA but ONE FC was recently voted into the list of top tier promotions by consensus meaning that as of now Oishi has fought for the highest title of a top tier MMA organization and fought at least three (3) fights for top tier MMA organizations so he now meets enough of the WP:NMMA criteria to have his own page. -Sadoka74 (talk) 10:56, 26 March 2014 (UTC)

  Not done - this Requests for Undeletion process is only for articles that were deleted uncontroversially, and does not apply to articles deleted after a deletion discussion. Since the article you are here about was deleted after a discussion took place at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Koji Oishi (2nd nomination), it cannot be undeleted through this process. However, if you believe that the outcome of the discussion did not reflect the consensus of the participants, or that significant new information has come to light since the article was deleted, you may contact the administrator who closed the discussion, user The Bushranger (talk · contribs). After you do so, if your concerns are not addressed and you still seek undeletion, a request may be made at deletion review. JohnCD (talk) 11:37, 26 March 2014 (UTC)

Jesse Brown (radio host)

Latest comment: 10 years ago2 comments2 people in discussion

Page in progress, and just because it references a Canadian Cultural item it gets deleted in <24 hrs. bah. PS Ruby Tuesday(or whatever is VERY unhelpful to other Wikipedians. I just cannot understand that if this is intended as an encyclopedia of encyclopedias, why then is the en wikipedia so US biased. (end rant). -Richard416282 (talk) 09:29, 26 March 2014 (UTC)

  Not done. @Richard416282, Tokyogirl79: Even a rant can be effective if it makes persuasive points. You have said not one thing that even arguably addresses the basis for the deletion. We do not keep placeholders for content to be written in the future. Your idea that this is the result of some U.S. bias is wholly in your mind. It's simple. Write a good article, on a notable subject, citing to reliable sources, with actual content, it'll be kept. Also, you can start a draft of an article as a sandpage in your userspace (e.g., at User:Richard416282/Jesse Brown (radio host)), and work on it at your leisure, until you're ready to go live. That's appropriate. Creating live entries in the mainspace with "something will be here" is not.--Fuhghettaboutit (talk) 11:45, 26 March 2014 (UTC)

Chessie (band)

Latest comment: 10 years ago2 comments2 people in discussion

A7'ed awful quickly yesterday. This band had multiple releases on Plug Research, which passes WP:MUSIC, and there's coverage, to boot (e.g. here, here, here). Requesting restoration of deleted article; I'll add any of what I said here that wasn't already in the article. -Chubbles (talk) 04:18, 26 March 2014 (UTC)

  Done. I deleted the article. After that, administrator Paul Erik (talk · contribs) left a note on my talk page proposing restoration for the purpose of adding more references, believing that the article would meet WP:GNG. Chubbles is also a trusted long-standing editor. I have no objection to making a WP:IAR exception to the A7 rule on this page. ~Amatulić (talk) 15:04, 26 March 2014 (UTC)

Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Warl0ck Gam3z

Latest comment: 10 years ago2 comments2 people in discussion

I, C0d3ph4anat!c, request the undeletion of this Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page as I intend to work on it. C0d3ph4anat!c (talk) 12:35, 25 March 2014 (UTC)

  Done - as an Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13, the page has been restored on request. Please edit the page to address the issues raised when it was declined, and re-submit it; "Articles for creation" is not for the indefinite hosting of material found to be unsuitable for inclusion in the encyclopedia.. Read WP:Your first article for advice, and note that references showing "significant coverage in reliable sources that are independent of the subject" are necessary to establish Wikipedia:Notability. JohnCD (talk) 15:20, 26 March 2014 (UTC)

Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Langdon Eudel Homer

Latest comment: 10 years ago2 comments2 people in discussion

207.86.122.38 (talk) 01:01, 26 March 2014 (UTC)

  Done - as an Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13, the page has been restored on request. Please edit the page to address the issues raised when it was declined, and re-submit it; "Articles for creation" is not for the indefinite hosting of material found to be unsuitable for inclusion in the encyclopedia. I am afraid this is not likely to be acceptable - see WP:MILPEOPLE for Wikipedia's notability standard for articles like this. JohnCD (talk) 15:27, 26 March 2014 (UTC)

Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/HooplaHa - Life with a Smile

Latest comment: 10 years ago2 comments2 people in discussion

I, HooplaHa, request the undeletion of this Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page as I intend to work on it. HooplaHa (talk) 15:44, 26 March 2014 (UTC)

  Not done. Restoring purely promotional hype like this has no benefit to the Wikipedia project. Also, this user has been indef blocked as a spamusername. ~Amatulić (talk) 16:14, 26 March 2014 (UTC)

File:Cathy Luchetti author West.jpg

Latest comment: 10 years ago3 comments2 people in discussion

Permission received via OTRS (Ticket:2014013010015408) ---Mdann52talk to me! 08:16, 26 March 2014 (UTC)

  Not done — yet. I have looked at the OTRS ticket, and I find the due diligence to establish identity lacking, particularly for this image. There are three problems with that ticket: (a) a gmail address does not establish identity; (b) the subject of the photo generally does not own the copyright; and (c) a proof of transfer of copyright from the photographer, or a letter identifiably from the photographer has not been received. ~Amatulić (talk) 15:27, 26 March 2014 (UTC)
File was re-uploaded anyway, and a new OTRS ticket created Ticket:2014032110000401, which has the same problems. I have replied with a request for the sender to address these issues. ~Amatulić (talk) 16:39, 26 March 2014 (UTC)

Patrick McKeown

Latest comment: 10 years ago2 comments2 people in discussion

Notable Buteyko method practitioner (Western school, Ireland), researcher in the field of alternative physical therapy, author of several bestsellers on Buteyko breathing techniques. Books translated to other languages. The sources are about the subject of the article and his research and further development of Buteyko asthma treatment techniques + the books. There is a patent war between Western and 2 Russian schools for the rights to practice Buteyko method, therefore somebody keeps constantly deleting the article and any info about the Western school practitioners. Only one out of 3 schools is currently represented in wikipedia, and 2 other schools are claiming that the Moscow school (represented) is the fake one, which is probably the truth (looks like if you dig deeper into the sources). -sobaka_kachalova 12:26, 26 March 2014 (UTC)

  Done. Already restored by JohnCD (talk · contribs). ~Amatulić (talk) 14:56, 26 March 2014 (UTC)
  • Thank you. I will try to improve it, so they would have less chances.--sobaka_kachalova 17:40, 26 March 2014 (UTC) — Preceding unsigned comment added by SobakaKachalova (talk • contribs)

Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Odyssea - Be a hero

Latest comment: 10 years ago2 comments2 people in discussion

I, Tirooriroo, request the undeletion of this Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page as I intend to work on it. Working really hard, lack of time to finish the article. I wish I was warned earlier. Tirooriroo (talk) 00:08, 27 March 2014 (UTC)

  Not done. @Tirooriroo: This was a blatant copyright violation, copying and pasting the text from here.--Fuhghettaboutit (talk) 00:38, 27 March 2014 (UTC)

Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Rafael Martinez

Latest comment: 10 years ago2 comments2 people in discussion

I think I have to work more on the documentation and I will dedicate time to it -Gabriel0317 (talk) 22:59, 26 March 2014 (UTC)

  Done - @Gabriel0317: as an Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13, the page has been restored on request. Please edit the page to address the issues raised when it was declined, and re-submit it; "Articles for creation" is not for the indefinite hosting of material found to be unsuitable for inclusion in the encyclopedia.--Fuhghettaboutit (talk) 00:41, 27 March 2014 (UTC)

Legacy Building Solutions

Latest comment: 10 years ago2 comments2 people in discussion

I apologize that this page looked like advertisement. This business page wasn't any sort of advertisement or trying to just earn recognition from being on Wikipedia, this business is highly recognized in the Fabric building world. It's the Apple for fabric structures. I will edit and change parts if there are lines that seem too promotional but there are many businesses on Wikipedia without any references at all, yet they are still a part of Wikipedia. Legacy Business Solutions had many references, including new stories and mentioned in New York's business market due to all of their buildings for them. I would deeply appreciate it if you please reconsidered on this business page. Thank you. -Mandirenfroe (talk) 01:17, 27 March 2014 (UTC)

  Userfied - the page has been restored to the userspace at user:Mandirenfroe/sandbox. Acroterion (talk) 02:32, 27 March 2014 (UTC)

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia_talk:Articles_for_creation/Tribeca_Grand_Hotel

Latest comment: 10 years ago2 comments2 people in discussion

page was being edited with new references, and less advertising verbiage per feedback -LECR (talk) 04:02, 27 March 2014 (UTC)

  Done - @LECR: as an Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13, the page has been restored on request. Please edit the page to address the issues raised when it was declined, and re-submit it; "Articles for creation" is not for the indefinite hosting of material found to be unsuitable for inclusion in the encyclopedia.--Fuhghettaboutit (talk) 04:17, 27 March 2014 (UTC)

Heman1982

Latest comment: 10 years ago2 comments2 people in discussion

I think its very harsh decision taken to delete my page. As it was my first try atleast provide me where I am wrong. In that page no self promotion is there. As I seen many profile they written their achievements. Waiting for your reply -Heman1982 (talk) 05:22, 27 March 2014 (UTC)

  •   Not done You used your personal userpage to create an article about a wholly non-notable company. Wikipedia is not about profiles - that's the job of LinkedIn and Facebook. It's also entirely promotional, using phrases for "Lucky for WEB Promotz" (by the way, becoming a Google Certified Partner is not big deal). Wikipedia is not an indiscriminate list of companies that exist; it's an encyclopedia of notable topics DP 08:47, 27 March 2014 (UTC)

Google

Latest comment: 10 years ago3 comments3 people in discussion

Enter your reasoning here and then click the "Save page" button below -123.63.216.67 (talk) 04:33, 27 March 2014 (UTC) Images are not showing.

This page is not for technical issues with Wikipedia. Post at WP:Help desk instead. —Jeremy v^_^v Bori! 05:17, 27 March 2014 (UTC)

Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Tim & Puma Mimi

Latest comment: 10 years ago2 comments2 people in discussion

I, 77.58.37.224, request the undeletion of this Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page as I intend to work on it. 77.58.37.224 (talk) 08:41, 27 March 2014 (UTC)

Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Prem Singh Negi

Latest comment: 10 years ago2 comments2 people in discussion

I, Laghav, request the undeletion of this Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page as I intend to work on it. Laghav (talk) 02:07, 27 March 2014 (UTC)

  •   Done - as an Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13, the page has been restored on request. Please edit the page to address the issues raised when it was declined, and re-submit it; "Articles for creation" is not for the indefinite hosting of material found to be unsuitable for inclusion in the encyclopedia. DP 09:07, 27 March 2014 (UTC)

Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Counterfire

Latest comment: 10 years ago2 comments2 people in discussion

I, Tedcorred, request the undeletion of this Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page as I intend to work on it. Tedcorred (talk) 18:04, 26 March 2014 (UTC)

Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:Requests_for_undeletion/Archive_124&oldid=1138663627"