Wikipedia

Wikipedia:Requests for undeletion/Archive 149

< Wikipedia:Requests for undeletion
Latest comment: 10 years ago by JohnCD in topic Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Feefo
Archive 145←Archive 147Archive 148Archive 149Archive 150Archive 151→Archive 155

Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Han Bangqing

Latest comment: 10 years ago2 comments2 people in discussion

I, 2620:0:1000:157D:E192:E07A:2D9A:6CB5, request the undeletion of this Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page as I intend to work on it. 2620:0:1000:157D:E192:E07A:2D9A:6CB5 (talk) 19:08, 19 August 2014 (UTC)

  •   Done - as an Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13, the page has been restored on request. Please edit the page to address the issues raised when it was declined, and re-submit it; "Articles for creation" is not for the indefinite hosting of material found to be unsuitable for inclusion in the encyclopedia. You will have to improve and submit this again if you want it considered. Graeme Bartlett (talk) 23:14, 19 August 2014 (UTC)

Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Parflange F37

Latest comment: 10 years ago2 comments2 people in discussion

I, Def81, request the undeletion of this Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page as I intend to work on it. Def81 (talk) 11:48, 20 August 2014 (UTC)

  Done - @Def81: as an Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13, the page has been restored on request. Please edit the page to address the issues raised when it was declined, and re-submit it; "Articles for creation" is not for the indefinite hosting of material found to be unsuitable for inclusion in the encyclopedia.--Fuhghettaboutit (talk) 12:19, 20 August 2014 (UTC)

ProMetic

Latest comment: 10 years ago5 comments3 people in discussion

Hi Alex, Hope you can help, a friend of a friend complained to me that their company ‘ProMetic’ keeps getting confused with ‘Prometric’. I said I could try and create a non-promotional listing for ‘ProMetic’ to help out. Prometric even comes up in google suggest when you type in ProMetric. I expect I went overboard with the amount of copy and a simple shortened version would be good. Please take my word that I am not looking to wiki as an advertising platform. Your suggestions to get approval for this listing would be very much appreciated. Thank you Marcos Richardson Marcosvr (talk) 15:54, 20 August 2014 (UTC)

Please post your request directly on User talk:Alexf. @Alexf:, reply here if you see this. I have no objection to userfying the article for improvement and then submitting it through WP:AFC, which is the appropriate venue for a user with a conflict of interest like this. ~Amatulić (talk) 16:39, 20 August 2014 (UTC)
(Although, I must add, someone else's poor choice of a company name shouldn't be Wikipedia's problem. ~Amatulić (talk) 16:41, 20 August 2014 (UTC))
Agree with Amatulić and have no objection on userfying as long as the editor does a proper job to make an article that sticks within the rules (or posts to AfC if needed. -- Alexf(talk) 16:51, 20 August 2014 (UTC)
@Marcosvr:   Userfied - the page has been restored to the userspace at User:Marcosvr/ProMetic. Work on it there, make certain that it complies with WP:CORP, and submit to Articles for Creation (there's a button at the top of the page for you to do this). ~Amatulić (talk) 18:28, 20 August 2014 (UTC)

David_Kirsch

Latest comment: 10 years ago2 comments2 people in discussion

This biographical article about a game developer was deleted swiftly and with only a single comment supporting the deletion. Based on the user page of the person who nominated it for deletion, that user (Vaypertrail) has several comments about making unconstructive edits on Valve Software related pages and their talk pages, and apparently nominated every single Valve employee's page for deletion regardless of their actual notability. David "Zoid" Kirsch is well known in the Quake and Dota 2 communities, and somewhat well known in the World of Warcraft community, having several in-game items named for him. He is also notable for having worked on the popular Metroid Prime series, and is at least as well known as most of the other game developers who have pages that have not be deleted for notability criteria. This page was nominated by someone with an obvious axe to grind or personal vendetta, who was not actually interested in upholding Wikipedia's guidelines and nominated it in bad faith. It should be restored, updated, and any problems with the reliability of its links addressed individually. Note that he has since legally changed his first name from David to Zoid. -68.204.229.19 (talk) 19:57, 20 August 2014 (UTC)

  Not done - this Requests for Undeletion process is only for articles that were deleted uncontroversially, and does not apply to articles deleted after a deletion discussion. Since the article you are here about was deleted after a discussion took place at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/David Kirsch, it cannot be undeleted through this process. However, if you believe that the outcome of the discussion did not reflect the consensus of the participants, or that significant new information has come to light since the article was deleted, you may contact the administrator who closed the discussion, user MBisanz (talk · contribs). After you do so, if your concerns are not addressed and you still seek undeletion, a request may be made at deletion review. ~Amatulić (talk) 21:36, 20 August 2014 (UTC)

Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Daniel Lopez-Paullada (photographer)

Latest comment: 10 years ago2 comments2 people in discussion

I, Danlopezphoto, request the undeletion of this Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page as I intend to work on it. Danlopezphoto (talk) 16:44, 20 August 2014 (UTC)

  Done - as an Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13, the page has been restored on request. Please edit the page to address the issues raised when it was declined, and re-submit it; "Articles for creation" is not for the indefinite hosting of material found to be unsuitable for inclusion in the encyclopedia. ~Amatulić (talk) 21:39, 20 August 2014 (UTC)
Latest comment: 10 years ago2 comments2 people in discussion

This page was a useful list of deaths related in some way to the game of chess, similar lists exist for other games, for example List of association footballers who died while playing and List of professional cyclists who died during a race, also the death related section of Video game addiction. -109.76.28.47 (talk) 23:15, 20 August 2014 (UTC)

  Not done - this Requests for Undeletion process is only for articles that were deleted uncontroversially, and does not apply to articles deleted after a deletion discussion. Since the article you are here about was deleted after a discussion took place at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/List of chess-related deaths, it cannot be undeleted through this process.

Normally I would advise you of other ways you might seek undeletion if certain conditions were met, but this article was already taken to deletion review, here where the deletion discussion was soguht to be overturned, but was endorsed..--Fuhghettaboutit (talk) 23:39, 20 August 2014 (UTC)

indfrnd

Latest comment: 10 years ago3 comments2 people in discussion

It is a social networking website started & it needs to be listed -Indfrnd anil (talk) 03:33, 21 August 2014 (UTC)

  • On a side note, please be aware that existing does not automatically mean that something is notable (WP:ITEXISTS) and all websites should have received enough coverage in reliable sources (WP:RS) to show that they pass notability guidelines per WP:WEB. I don't mean this to sound harsh, but we're not supposed to be a database of every website (regardless of type) that has been launched. (WP:INDISCRIMINATE) You still have to show how the website is notable by showing where newspapers, news stations, and the like have given Indfrnd coverage. Tokyogirl79 (｡◕‿◕｡) 03:43, 21 August 2014 (UTC)

Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Warming Up (Novel)

Latest comment: 10 years ago2 comments2 people in discussion

I, MrPips55, request the undeletion of this Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page as I intend to work on it. MrPips55 (talk) 02:59, 21 August 2014 (UTC)

Thank you.

Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Kate Richards

Latest comment: 10 years ago2 comments2 people in discussion

I, 116.240.134.38, request the undeletion of this Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page as I intend to work on it. 116.240.134.38 (talk) 06:49, 21 August 2014 (UTC)

  Done - as an Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13, the page has been restored on request. Please edit the page to address the issues raised when it was declined, and re-submit it; "Articles for creation" is not for the indefinite hosting of material found to be unsuitable for inclusion in the encyclopedia. §FreeRangeFrogcroak 07:16, 21 August 2014 (UTC)

Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Muïesis

Latest comment: 10 years ago3 comments3 people in discussion

(This user used the preload form for AFC undeletion, but did not specify the name of the AFC draft they would like undeleted. Consider checking their deleted contributions.) Jane Foster (talk) 14:42, 21 August 2014 (UTC)

I declined this one previously with a request to the user to please provide some minimal secondary coverage of the neologism, with no success. There is no chance as far as I can see that this would ever be accepted. §FreeRangeFrogcroak 17:09, 21 August 2014 (UTC)

Absolutely Fabulous Tours

Latest comment: 10 years ago2 comments2 people in discussion

There was a misunderstanding with the article I published about a small company located in Napa, California. This was the first article I have written and it is still a rough draft. I realize I need to put in more history, but this was the short-term basic information I got from sources such as The Way Back Machine (http://archive.org/web/), review websites, blogs, and the company website. I wasn't aware that it would be published that quick nor that it wasn't meeting the requirements. I tried to follow the outline from Burger King's page, but I knew it was unfinished work that I didn't mean to publish yet. Please allow me another chance to make amends to my mistake by implementing more content that makes it encyclopedia relevant. -Abfabulous (talk) 16:42, 21 August 2014 (UTC)

  Not done, and the account has been blocked as a username policy violation as well as for using Wikipedia for publicity purposes. ~Amatulić (talk) 20:07, 21 August 2014 (UTC)

Mix Master David

Latest comment: 10 years ago3 comments3 people in discussion

I followed the logic and rules for creating the biography article and it appears the page was deleted -Kandi1978 (talk) 16:41, 21 August 2014 (UTC)

  Not done. Those rules include writing in a neutral point of view rather than using promotional language, as well as ensuring the subject has significant coverage in independent reliable sources, in particular meeting WP:MUSICBIO criteria. If you have any association with the subject, you might want to try submitting the article through WP:AFC instead. ~Amatulić (talk) 19:59, 21 August 2014 (UTC)
(edit conflict) Also, it was a copyright violation, largely copied from his website at http://www.mixmasterdavid.com/artists/bio-2/, which explains the promotional tone. You must not copy material into Wikipedia, see WIkipedia:Copy-paste. Read WP:Your first article, and write in your own words, no glowing adjectives, just plain facts of what he has actually achieved, neutrally stated and cited to reliable sources. Use what other people say about him, not what he says about himself, and show how he meets the requirements of WP:MUSICBIO. JohnCD (talk) 20:10, 21 August 2014 (UTC)

Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Cardinal Peak Engineering

Latest comment: 10 years ago2 comments2 people in discussion

I, Aking1309, request the undeletion of this Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page as I intend to work on it. Aking1309 (talk) 17:20, 21 August 2014 (UTC)

  Done - as an Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13, the page has been restored on request. Please edit the page to address the issues raised when it was declined, and re-submit it; "Articles for creation" is not for the indefinite hosting of material found to be unsuitable for inclusion in the encyclopedia. ~Amatulić (talk) 20:10, 21 August 2014 (UTC)

Colorado Pride

Latest comment: 10 years ago2 comments2 people in discussion

Enter your reasoning here and then click the "Save page" button below -Ssanchez1978 (talk) 19:07, 21 August 2014 (UTC)

  Not done, nothing to do. The page isn't deleted, and nobody seems to have proposed it for deletion either. Even if someone did, this isn't the place to contest pending deletions. ~Amatulić (talk) 20:12, 21 August 2014 (UTC)

Fulmer Cup

Latest comment: 10 years ago3 comments2 people in discussion

Enter your reasoning here and then click the "Save page" button below -G8R8U2 (talk) 01:10, 22 August 2014 (UTC)

I have no clue why this page was deleted. The information contained on the page is significant for thousands of college football fans, even though there is a new site tabulating the results, so the link may not work. The page here is a historical record that gets updated once a year when the "award" is administered. It is still an active compilation. Apparently some Bot deleted the page; and I'm requesting the information and the page be restored. Thank you.

  • It looks like it went through a deletion discussion at AfD, meaning that it wasn't deleted by a bot. You can go through WP:DR if you want, but you will need to show that the award itself has received coverage in reliable sources. Existing or being useful aren't reasons in and of themselves to keep an article. (WP:ITEXISTS, WP:ITSUSEFUL, WP:ITSPOPULAR) Stuff like that can make it more likely that something will gain coverage in WP:RS, but it's not a guarantee. Tokyogirl79 (｡◕‿◕｡) 06:22, 22 August 2014 (UTC)

Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Tekmira Pharmaceuticals

Latest comment: 10 years ago3 comments2 people in discussion

I, Rich Farmbrough, request the undeletion of this Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page as I intend to work on it. All the best: Rich Farmbrough, 23:30, 21 August 2014 (UTC).
23:30, 21 August 2014 (UTC)

Thanks, this company is in the news with the Ebola outbreak, so a stub already exists. I will see what the best way forward is. All the best: Rich Farmbrough, 21:54, 24 August 2014 (UTC).

Embryonics Project (2)

Latest comment: 10 years ago4 comments4 people in discussion

It's exactly my point: the page was deleted specifically due to the reason of copyright infringement. The problem has been fixed, the page should logically be restored -128.178.116.11 (talk) 15:40, 13 August 2014 (UTC)

  Not done. Please respond in the section on this subject above. It is proposed to move it to Wikiversity. ~Amatulić (talk) 17:34, 13 August 2014 (UTC)
Your request for move to Wikiversity was denied, and your neutrality on this issue is highly questionable. I advise you remove yourself from this discussion, due to your bias.66.220.250.160 (talk) 12:50, 18 August 2014 (UTC)

Coming into this discussion as a non-administrator with no connection to the discussion, it seems clear to me that the anonymous user demanding that the article be restored to the main article space and refusing transwiki restoration, is the biased one. Please do answer the latest points on copyright violation referring to books that predate the article. --Slashme (talk) 06:30, 22 August 2014 (UTC)

Robotics Club,Pashchimanchal Campus

Latest comment: 10 years ago3 comments3 people in discussion

The Page is in Wikipedia to provide information about multi-college organisation in Nepal which is contributing in Technical development of students in Engineering Colleges of Nepal. You can also view the information about Robotics club in Institute of Engineering[IOE]'s "Institute of Engineering". Institute of Engineering.. Thanks for the concern you provide to this page. Thank you -Krishna418 (talk) 02:41, 22 August 2014 (UTC)

Krishna418, the article I deleted was about a club in a single college. To the best of my memory, we have never in the last 8 years considered such a club notable, so I do not see how I would accomplish anything useful if I undeleted it: the community would surely remove it. But if you really have good source for it being a multi-college national organization, why not write an article from that perspective with an appropriate title? I'm still not sure the consensus would be to keep it, but it would at least have a chance. If you'd like the text of the deleted article emailed to you as a start , let me know on my talk page--and make sure you have email enabled. DGG ( talk ) 08:10, 22 August 2014 (UTC)

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Rajesh_Bhatt

Latest comment: 10 years ago2 comments2 people in discussion

Enter your reasoning here and then click the "Save page" button below -183.82.229.106 (talk) 12:41, 22 August 2014 (UTC)

i'm Rajesh bhatt ... Film Director... i would like to create my wiki page you can check my personal website - www.rajeshbhatt.info

kindly restore the information

  •   Not done and will not be done I'm sorry, but not only was the material a copyright violation, but it was also wildly promotional. There's no way that we could restore that to the mainspace, as it would require a complete and total re-write in order to fit our neutrality policy (WP:NPOV). We also discourage people from making articles about themselves or things that they are involved in (ie, you editing an article for your own movie.) If you do want to create an article, I'd recommend that you make it via WP:AfC- the only thing is that you will still have to show notability by providing sources that are independent of you and in a reliable source. Tokyogirl79 (｡◕‿◕｡) 13:14, 22 August 2014 (UTC)

José Antunes Sobrinho

Latest comment: 10 years ago2 comments2 people in discussion

This person has notability and the sources will be improoved. This is not an ad. I'd like if this page was undeleted. Thank you. -Márcio Bertuol (talk) 12:05, 22 August 2014 (UTC)

  •   Not done The article uses phrases that are very promotional as far as Wikipedia is concerned. It was written as if it was a press release as opposed to a neutral article and would require a complete and total re-write in order to meet our NPOV policy. This is actually pretty understandable, since you are editing on behalf of a marketing (PR) company. Don't take this the wrong way, but you're used to writing things in a promotional manner because for most of your job it's not only acceptable but it's expected. It's just that on here, the tone needs to be very, very different in order to pass neutrality standards. Think of it this way: like in that old TV show, all we want is "just the facts". This doesn't mean that it has to be choppy, just that rather than playing up Antunes Sobrinho's talents with various phrases that come across as WP:PROMOTIONAL, WP:PUFFERY, or overly flowery (to Wikipedia) we would prefer a paragraph that reads like this:
"Shortly after graduating from the Institute for Hydraulic and Environmental Studies of Delft, Antunes Sobrinho began working for (insert company name here). In 1982 he began working for Engevix Engenharia SA and became its managing director in 1986. Antunes Sobrinho has worked on multiple hydro power projects in Brazil and has been involved in over 40.000 MW either in hydro or thermal power plants."
This condenses not only the bit about his graduation but also his early career. It's not that we don't want to be thorough, but it shouldn't be overly promotional either. Using phrases such as "major hydro power projects" and " From small to large projects Mr. Antunes has been involved in over 40.000 MW either in hydro or thermal power plants." comes across like you're trying to sell him- and that's not Wikipedia's purpose. Again, you work for a marketing company and I do acknowledge that you're used to writing in a promotional manner and not the style we do here, so I understand that it can be difficult. I had a big problem with NPOV writing when I first started editing, so I can only imagine what it'd be like from your perspective. Now that said, since you do have a conflict of interest I'd recommend that you not create any further copies in the mainspace. I'd personally recommend that you go through WP:AfC, our articles for creation process. This will allow you to work on a copy at your leisure. It won't be in the mainspace, but it will give you time to fix any issues and have the article approved by a non-involved editor, which will help allay concerns of COI. The only drawback is that this can take a while, but the benefit is that you will be able to fix any issues with the article if it's declined, whereas on the mainspace it would just be deleted. Tokyogirl79 (｡◕‿◕｡) 13:30, 22 August 2014 (UTC)

Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Ingloreusemodz

Latest comment: 10 years ago2 comments2 people in discussion

(This user used the preload form for AFC undeletion, but did not specify the name of the AFC draft they would like undeleted. Consider checking their deleted contributions.) 174.59.247.74 (talk) 12:37, 22 August 2014 (UTC)

  •   Not done I'm sorry, but the article is written in a fairly non-neutral, hero-worship tone and even if it was restored, you'd have to completely re-write it in order to have it pass guidelines for neutrality. There's also an issue of notability since the article didn't have any sourcing. He sounds interesting- anyone who tries to shut down child pornography sites is OK in my book- but right now it's just better if you just write a new copy of the article. Tokyogirl79 (｡◕‿◕｡) 13:33, 22 August 2014 (UTC)

Joseph Joseph

Latest comment: 10 years ago2 comments2 people in discussion

Joseph Joseph is a Multi-award-winning Kitchenware manufacturer based in the United Kingdom selling in over 100 countries worldwide - Press: [1],[2] Mentions:[3],[4],[5],[6] -141.0.59.138 (talk) 15:20, 22 August 2014 (UTC)

What are you going on about? The article isn't deleted, and doesn't seem to be proposed for deletion either. ~Amatulić (talk) 16:20, 22 August 2014 (UTC)

User:Sangonca/Workmen's Auto Insurance

Latest comment: 10 years ago2 comments2 people in discussion

I, Sangonca, request the undeletion of this Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page as I intend to work on it. Sangonca (talk) 13:52, 22 August 2014 (UTC)

I'd been taking this past few months to find more references to support the validity of the article. Today when I was going to work on it, the article got deleted. I appreciate if you give me the chance to work on it with the new information I found so that I can send it for review one last time.

Thanks!

@Sangonca:   Done - as an Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13, the page has been restored on request. Please edit the page to address the issues raised when it was declined, and re-submit it; "Articles for creation" is not for the indefinite hosting of material found to be unsuitable for inclusion in the encyclopedia. JohnCD (talk) 16:24, 22 August 2014 (UTC)

Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/FibroScan

Latest comment: 10 years ago3 comments3 people in discussion

I, Bananasinpj, request the undeletion of this Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page as I intend to work on it. Bananasinpj (talk) 14:21, 22 August 2014 (UTC)

  Not done And will not be done. That was nothing more than an advertisement the product. §FreeRangeFrogcroak 16:36, 22 August 2014 (UTC)
(edit conflict) @Bananasinpj:   Not done - this article is a copyright violation, substantially copied from the company website at www.knscanada.com, so cannot be restored. Even if a formal copyright release were made, this is far too promotional: copying a company's website is not the way to make an encyclopedia article. Wikipedia is not for advertising or promotion of any kind. JohnCD (talk) 16:41, 22 August 2014 (UTC)

Mr. Christiansen .jpg

Latest comment: 10 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

Trying to add this photo to 'Nordic Valley, Utah', this is a 'free' from copyright. It's an old family photo with permission to use by me and my family. I'm the daughter of Mr. Christiansen. Not sure why this is so hard to add to my entry about Nordic Valley. It's OK to use this photo of him. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Calirose (talk • contribs) 16:53, 22 August 2014‎

@Calirose: I guess the picture you mean is File:Mr. Christiansen, Nordic Valley.jpg. Unfortunately, we are not the people who make this difficult: it is the complicated law of copyright. Just saying "It's OK to use this photo" is not enough. The place to ask advice is Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. They will need to know things like: Who took the photograph? When? Has it ever been published? JohnCD (talk) 20:10, 22 August 2014 (UTC)

Go Rentals

Latest comment: 10 years ago2 comments2 people in discussion

I would like to view and revise the page as a stub -HollyQ (talk) 17:45, 22 August 2014 (UTC)

  Not done For now. I've asked the user to follow our COI guidelines and create a clear disclosure. Pending that this could be userified. Either way, going forward all article creations should go through AFC. §FreeRangeFrogcroak 20:39, 22 August 2014 (UTC)

Draft:David Lozeau

Latest comment: 10 years ago2 comments2 people in discussion

I, Poopa12, request the undeletion of this Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page as I intend to work on it. Poopa12 (talk) 00:27, 23 August 2014 (UTC)

  Done - as an Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13, the page has been restored on request. Please note that you never submitted the entry for review. When you are ready, you need to click the green notice in the template at the top of the page that says "Submit your draft when you are ready for it to be reviewed!" §FreeRangeFrogcroak 02:51, 23 August 2014 (UTC)

Undeletion or open Johncongo

Latest comment: 10 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

Can you help me undelete or open the article as i will like to create it properly

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Draft:Johncongo 11:26, 23 August 2014 (UTC) Latertinsna 11:26, 23 August 2014 (UTC)

  Not done This "article" has never been deleted. I have already provided you information on your talkpage so that you would not request undeletion of something that was not deleted. the panda ₯’ 11:37, 23 August 2014 (UTC)

It was a mistake i meant Johncongo and this is the draft https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Draft:Johncongo Johncongo is the same as Johncongo rapper it was created when Johncongo was unable to be created Pls help..i will like to create it and redirect Johncongo_(rapper) to Johncongo

The Nekci Menij Show

Latest comment: 10 years ago2 comments2 people in discussion

This page was about an online show I currently produce. I did not create or edit the page but I know it was properly referenced and reviewed by regular contributors. I do not know why it was deleted, or any reason that it should be, other than knowing that some individuals have recently unfairly reported other references to my work online. I would be happy to make any necessary changes myself to see the page reinstated. Thank you. -2.220.154.104 (talk) 23:24, 22 August 2014 (UTC)

  Not done. This article was deleted after a deletion discussion at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/The Nekci Menij Show, and articles deleted in that way are not restored here. If you consider that the close did not reflect the consensus of the discussion, or you have more information, you should first contact the administrator who closed the discussion, user Sandstein (talk). Then, if your concerns are not addressed, you may apply at WP:Deletion review. JohnCD (talk) 13:45, 23 August 2014 (UTC)

Xendan.org

Latest comment: 10 years ago2 comments2 people in discussion

I think this article should be created since it is about a #1 Kurdish website in Kurdistan -Hzr Kurdistani (talk) 08:48, 23 August 2014 (UTC)

@Hzr Kurdistani:   Userfied - the page has been restored to the userspace at User:Hzr Kurdistani/Xendan.org. You may work on improving the article's assertion of notability at its new location, but please contact Bbb23 (talk · contribs), the administrator who deleted the page, before moving it back to the article space. Please see the criteria for speedy deletion and the relevant notability guidelines - you need to show references to "significant coverage in reliable sources that are independent of the subject.". JohnCD (talk) 13:50, 23 August 2014 (UTC)

Khorasan Institute of Higher Education

Latest comment: 10 years ago3 comments3 people in discussion

Enter your reasoning here and then click the "Save page" button below -Eidiani (talk) 14:47, 23 August 2014 (UTC)

"Khorasan Institute of Higher Education" was established in 1994, as a response to he high demand for higher education in The Islamic Republic of Iran. Please see the below link.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_universities_in_Iran http://fa.wikipedia.org/wiki/%D9%85%D8%A4%D8%B3%D8%B3%D9%87_%D8%A2%D9%85%D9%88%D8%B2%D8%B4_%D8%B9%D8%A7%D9%84%DB%8C_%D8%AE%D8%B1%D8%A7%D8%B3%D8%A7%D9%86 www.khorasan.ac.ir

  Not done – Please contact User:FreeRangeFrog, the admin who deleted it as WP:CSD#G11. Usually you expected to give some evidence of notability; simply linking to the college's own website is not sufficient. Since the website seems to be in Farsi, this makes it difficult for editors who don't speak that language to assist you. If the Khorasan Institute has been mentioned in English-language publications that would help your case. EdJohnston (talk) 15:02, 23 August 2014 (UTC)
I don't have a problem with the recreation of this article, as with any article about a school. I don't doubt the institution is notable. The problem was that it was so blatantly promotional it was beyond repair at that point, so it makes no sense to undelete. An article about a school is not a brochure about the school, it's a series of sourced neutral facts about the school. I'd invite Eidiani to create a draft or use AFC and work on it that way instead of creating it directly. The Teahouse is also helpful for new editors. §FreeRangeFrogcroak 15:15, 23 August 2014 (UTC)

RKX HaXer (Security researcher)

Latest comment: 10 years ago2 comments2 people in discussion

This Page was about RKX HaXer security researcher from Pakistan and founded XSS in many sites also in google, born on 1999 february -Iameijazb (talk) 13:27, 23 August 2014 (UTC)

  Not done – Please contact User:NawlinWiki, the admin who deleted the article as WP:CSD#A7. Since you want to create an article on a pseudonym (not an actual person's name) you would need high quality evidence of their importance. Even in case of a pseudonym you'd need to satisfy WP:BLP – unsourced articles about persons are routinely deleted. The deleted article was unsourced since it did not link to any actual writings about this person. It falls way short of what would be expected here. EdJohnston (talk) 15:23, 23 August 2014 (UTC)

Johncongo

Latest comment: 10 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

I will like to create the article properly https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Draft:Johncongo -Latertinsna 13:00, 23 August 2014 (UTC) Latertinsna 13:13, 23 August 2014 (UTC)

  •   Not done and will not be done This already exists in the mainspace at Johncongo (rapper). However I do also want to note that the page was already previously deleted several times at Johncongo to the point where they had to protect it from re-creation. I also don't see where the current article really deals with a lot of the issues of notability, as most of the links are dead and the others don't even seem to mention him. I will probably bring this to AfD, to give you fair warning. If it is deleted, then I would like to formally ask that you stop trying to re-create this on Wikipedia. Tokyogirl79 (｡◕‿◕｡) 16:10, 23 August 2014 (UTC)

Lauren McLaughlin

Latest comment: 10 years ago2 comments2 people in discussion

Enter your reasoning here and then click the "Save page" button below -Karenhu (talk) 19:22, 23 August 2014 (UTC) Lauren McLaughlin page--I will remove the social media references, and the line about "autographed copies may be found at gotoelf.com"--will that resolve the problem? Prior to the addition of those items last week, there seemed to be no controversy about the page. Thank you, Karen Hunter

  •   Not done I'm sorry, but there are multiple issues here. First off, the promotional material goes beyond what you've mentioned above. The article is rife with various statements that come across as promotional and WP:PEACOCK in tone. At best, it's just wildly non-neutral and comes across as a fan page or the author's personal website. Please don't take that as me being harsh, it's just that the page would have to be re-written in order to fit our neutrality policy. A good example of one of the sentences that came across as promotional would be this one: "As Go To ELF! reached its second printing milestone, the ELF Book Project was launched, giving free copies of the book to prisons, shelters, hospices, mental health facilities, for people in recovery, and for anyone who wants to make positive changes in their lives." But there's an issue beyond that: I'm also not really seeing where she would ultimately pass our notability guidelines as a whole. I can't really find anything in a search to show that she or her work would pass WP:AUTHOR, which is a fairly strict guideline as a whole. You could try writing a new version at WP:AfC or at Draft:Lauren McLaughlin (by the by, articles should not be prefaced with Wikipedia:, as this is used for policy based pages), but I'm just worried about the lack of notability here. I saw coverage in WP:PRIMARY sources and in places Wikipedia wouldn't consider usable (blogs, merchant sites, etc), but not really in places where it'd be a reliable sources (newspaper articles about her or her work- ones that she has not written or worked for, etc). Tokyogirl79 (｡◕‿◕｡) 19:46, 23 August 2014 (UTC)

User:Kooroshict/Vegetarianism and philosophies

Latest comment: 10 years ago2 comments2 people in discussion

I, 178.131.19.210, request the undeletion of this Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page as I intend to work on it. 178.131.19.210 (talk) 20:36, 23 August 2014 (UTC)

PlantUML

Latest comment: 10 years ago3 comments2 people in discussion

Enter your reasoning here and then click the "Save page" button below -76.10.150.106 (talk) 21:49, 23 August 2014 (UTC)

I created Draft:PlantUML and I believe I have properly referenced at least three reliable sources (it's my first time creating a section, and I used the Wizard). A Google Scholar search for PlantUML turns up a lot these days. PlantUML should be restored, or merged/replaced with Draft:PlantUML. 76.10.150.106 (talk) 21:49, 23 August 2014 (UTC)

  Not done. Be patient; your draft has been submitted for review but, as explained in the box at the foot of it, there is a considerable queue. If it is accepted, it will be moved to the article space at PlantUML; if not, you will be given feedback. JohnCD (talk) 22:09, 23 August 2014 (UTC)

User:3371.NGO26/Action with Lao Children

Latest comment: 10 years ago3 comments3 people in discussion

I, 219.74.16.193, request the undeletion of this Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page as I intend to work on it. 219.74.16.193 (talk) 22:56, 23 August 2014 (UTC)

This doesnt appear to have been deleted just tagged for deletion. Also this is in a users name space so should really be edited by the userpage owner. Amortias (T)(C) 23:00, 23 August 2014 (UTC)
  Not done. There is no point undeleting this, because there is already a mainspace article Action with Lao Children. You are welcome to improve that. JohnCD (talk) 08:37, 24 August 2014 (UTC)

Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Chennai International Queer Film Festival

Latest comment: 10 years ago2 comments2 people in discussion

I, 117.193.186.202, request the undeletion of this Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page as I intend to work on it. 117.193.186.202 (talk) 01:08, 24 August 2014 (UTC)

  Done - as an Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13, the page has been restored on request. Please edit the page to address the issues raised when it was declined, and re-submit it; "Articles for creation" is not for the indefinite hosting of material found to be unsuitable for inclusion in the encyclopedia. JohnCD (talk) 08:43, 24 August 2014 (UTC)

Action_with_Lao_Children

Latest comment: 10 years ago3 comments3 people in discussion

Studying this topic and possible NGO collaboration opportunities -219.74.16.193 (talk) 03:59, 24 August 2014 (UTC)

This article has not been deleted, and is not proposed for deletion. You are welcome to improve it, if you have more information with reliable sources. JohnCD (talk) 08:41, 24 August 2014 (UTC)
  •   Not done It looks like they were referring to this userspace draft. The only problem is that the page doesn't contain any actual content at all- it's just the example page template. There's nothing to restore and as JohnCD said, you're welcome to help improve the pre-existing page on the subject. On a side note, if you were trying to use the draftspace as a potential study space, please be aware that this would somewhat be considered a misuse of Wikipedia as a webhost as we're not a place to host studywork or schoolwork, unless you're planning to use it to help improve the pre-existing article. Tokyogirl79 (｡◕‿◕｡) 13:50, 24 August 2014 (UTC)

Sanchit_Dang

Latest comment: 10 years ago3 comments3 people in discussion

Enter your reasoning here and then click the "Save page" button below -59.91.67.65 (talk) 14:56, 24 August 2014 (UTC)

  Not done With no reason provided, this "article" that was deleted 1.5 years ago will not be undeleted. Then again, even with a reason, it won't likely be good enough: WP:NMUSIC would apply, as would WP:BLP the panda ₯’ 15:08, 24 August 2014 (UTC)

Ivan Smolović

Latest comment: 10 years ago5 comments2 people in discussion

I wanna create new article under name of Ivan Smolović. He is Montenegrin football player who firmed contract for MFK Košice in Slovakian league -Cicimau (talk) 17:22, 24 August 2014 (UTC)

Page inder this name is blocked because is cteated on wrong way. Dear wikipedia please help me and unblock this name because i wanna create article under this name with good sources. Thank you. -Cicimau (talk) 17:33, 24 August 2014 (UTC)

  • On a side note, you could probably create a new version at WP:AfC and run it through that process. The only problem is that you will still need to show how he passes the notability guidelines now, but AfC will give you more time to work on proving that. Tokyogirl79 (｡◕‿◕｡) 17:42, 24 August 2014 (UTC)
  • @Cicimau: It looks like you did try to make a new copy in the article's talk page. Please do not do that, as it is considered to be generally inappopriate to try to get around the article's protection to do that. I've moved it to your userspace at User:Cicimau/Ivan Smolović and I've marked it as an AfC submission. Please work on improving what you've had so far and then run it through AfC. You can also request deletion review, but it'd probably be better to wait and do that after you finish working on the userspace article. Do not move it back to the mainspace article's talk page- run it through the proper channels instead. Tokyogirl79 (｡◕‿◕｡) 17:46, 24 August 2014 (UTC)

Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/John Bisaha

Latest comment: 10 years ago2 comments2 people in discussion

I, 76.219.200.105, request the undeletion of this Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page as I intend to work on it. 76.219.200.105 (talk) 21:28, 24 August 2014 (UTC)

  Done - as an Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13, the page has been restored on request. Please edit the page to address the issues raised when it was declined, and re-submit it; "Articles for creation" is not for the indefinite hosting of material found to be unsuitable for inclusion in the encyclopedia.. Note that the WP:Notability requirement is for references showing "significant coverage in reliable sources that are independent of the subject." His own website and his band's website are not enough. JohnCD (talk) 10:38, 25 August 2014 (UTC)

Sandip Goswami

Latest comment: 10 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

Thank you very much. But I am unable to understand clearly about " Notable ". Celebrities are notable! Who are trying to destroy our society, killing innocent ordinary people,controlling world economy and creating poverty. Ordinary people in the world are suffering. Here a poet like Sandip Goswami is fighting against the powerful abuses in the world. I believe that a true poet is in born Notable personality. They have sacrificed their life in favor of ordinary people without any demand. Please read the books of Sandip Goswami. Truly we want to touch your heart with love and respect. Here a page in Wikipedia is only a medium. We want only better tomorrow for people in the world. Please try to understand our mission with love and respect. Best wishes to you and your family.

  Note: The page was speedily-deleted under criterion A7. Pages deleted under that criterion are generally not undeleted because they require complete rewrites to be viable encyclopedia articles or because they violate our biographical or fair-use policies. We don't appreciate the proselytising, and we don't appreciate being used for propaganda or advertising of any sort. —Jeremy v^_^v Bori! 11:15, 25 August 2014 (UTC)

Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Harry Nagle

Latest comment: 10 years ago2 comments2 people in discussion

I, Harrynagle, request the undeletion of this Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page as I intend to work on it. This was worked on extensively then accidentally neglected by an assistant for the 6 months. Harry Nagle (talk) 06:09, 25 August 2014 (UTC)

  Done - as an Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13, the page has been restored on request. This page has never been submitted for review; please complete it and submit it as soon as convenient. "Articles for creation" is not for the indefinite hosting of material found to be unsuitable for inclusion in the encyclopedia.
Note that if it is to be accepted, the article will need references showing "significant coverage in reliable sources that are independent of the subject" to establish Wikipedia:Notability. You should also read Wikipedia:Autobiography and understand that if an article about you is accepted others can and will edit it, and you will not be able to insist on your preferred version. JohnCD (talk) 13:54, 25 August 2014 (UTC)

Ghuniya

Latest comment: 10 years ago2 comments2 people in discussion

Enter your reasoning here and then click the "Save page" button below -Raj Koyborto (talk) 05:30, 25 August 2014 (UTC)

  Not done. No reason given. User has also been indef blocked, therefore no action taken. ~Amatulić (talk) 23:24, 25 August 2014 (UTC)

Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Nuell Entertainment

Latest comment: 10 years ago2 comments2 people in discussion

I, Gnuell, request the undeletion of this Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page as I intend to work on it. Gnuell (talk) 22:10, 25 August 2014 (UTC)

  Declined. It was only two sentences and appeared to have a publicity purpose. You may create it again.
Also, please disclose your conflict of interest, since you seem to be writing in behalf of your company Nuell Entertainment. You agreed to such disclosure when you created an account here. See wmf:Terms of Use section 4. Is Gnuell your actual name? ~Amatulić (talk) 23:34, 25 August 2014 (UTC)

Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Mining Indaba (conference)

Latest comment: 10 years ago2 comments2 people in discussion

I, Tdasilva mine, request the undeletion of this Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page as I intend to work on it. Want to edit page with new/correct information to be submitted -Tdasilva mine (talk) 19:40, 25 August 2014 (UTC)

  Done - as an Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13, the page has been restored on request. Please edit the page to address the issues raised when it was declined, and re-submit it; "Articles for creation" is not for the indefinite hosting of material found to be unsuitable for inclusion in the encyclopedia. ~Amatulić (talk) 23:38, 25 August 2014 (UTC)

Daichi Shibata (footballer)

Latest comment: 10 years ago5 comments2 people in discussion

This article was deleted following Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Daichi Shibata (footballer). Now that he made a fully professional start a fortnight ago for Kataller Toyama against Montedio Yamagata in the J. League Division 2 as per [7] can it please be restored? I contacted the closing Admin User:slakr a week ago about this, but he is currently frolicking with chaos. -Nfitz (talk) 02:47, 25 August 2014 (UTC)

@Nfitz: can you help me find Shibata on that site? I don't see his name in the Toyama team here. JohnCD (talk) 10:33, 25 August 2014 (UTC)
@JohnCD:; you linked to the most recent match (August 24) where he didn't appear - here. I linked above to the August 10 match, where he (number 31) started - here's perhaps a better link in English from same site [8]. He also started on August 17 - [9]. Nfitz (talk) 14:18, 25 August 2014 (UTC)
OK,   Done. Please update the article and add the reference. JohnCD (talk) 15:04, 25 August 2014 (UTC)
Thanks - will do. Nfitz (talk) 02:06, 26 August 2014 (UTC)

Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/ChemPartner

Latest comment: 10 years ago2 comments2 people in discussion

(This user used the preload form for AFC undeletion, but did not specify the name of the AFC draft they would like undeleted. Consider checking their deleted contributions.) Zym27 (talk) 02:59, 26 August 2014 (UTC)

John Figarelli

Latest comment: 10 years ago2 comments2 people in discussion

No copyrighted material was submitted. Removed any copyrighted material. 1st time user. Thank you for understanding. -Johnfigwiki (talk) 03:47, 26 August 2014 (UTC)

  •   Not done the page was very promotional. It can be rewritten without words like passion, appreciation, lovely and terrific, and without including quotes. It is tough to write about yourself in a neutral way, and this is likely a WP:AUTO situation. Graeme Bartlett (talk) 05:21, 26 August 2014 (UTC)

Ebru_TV

Latest comment: 10 years ago2 comments2 people in discussion

Station is an important part of remaining FTA stations in the Ku Band, referenced in many FTA related wikipedia articles, as well as articles about notable TV series like Spooks and Doctor Who that they are currently airing. In addition the notability guidelines specificly state that TV stations that are actually broadcasting (not just streaming) are automaticly notable, so it should not have been deleted for the reason given - not meeting the general notability guidelines. The amount of references from other articles shows it is notable as well. -192.199.225.10 (talk) 06:52, 26 August 2014 (UTC)

  •   Not done - this Requests for Undeletion process is only for articles that were deleted uncontroversially, and does not apply to articles deleted after a deletion discussion. Since the article you are here about was deleted after a discussion took place at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Ebru TV, it cannot be undeleted through this process. However, if you believe that the outcome of the discussion did not reflect the consensus of the participants, or that significant new information has come to light since the article was deleted, you may contact the administrator who closed the discussion, user Cirt (talk · contribs). After you do so, if your concerns are not addressed and you still seek undeletion, a request may be made at deletion review. Tokyogirl79 (｡◕‿◕｡) 08:42, 26 August 2014 (UTC)

Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Mark Atkin

Latest comment: 10 years ago2 comments2 people in discussion

I, Ajnosonja, request the undeletion of this Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page as I intend to work on it. Ajnosonja (talk) 08:24, 26 August 2014 (UTC)

Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Feefo

Latest comment: 10 years ago2 comments2 people in discussion

Johndesmond (talk) 15:12, 26 August 2014 (UTC)

@Johndesmond:   Done - as an Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13, the page has been restored on request. Please edit the page to address the issues raised when it was declined, and re-submit it; "Articles for creation" is not for the indefinite hosting of material found to be unsuitable for inclusion in the encyclopedia. JohnCD (talk) 16:08, 26 August 2014 (UTC)
Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:Requests_for_undeletion/Archive_149&oldid=1142568686"