Wikipedia

Wikipedia:Requests for undeletion/Archive 155

< Wikipedia:Requests for undeletion
Latest comment: 10 years ago by Graeme Bartlett in topic Section 4 (NYSPHSAA)
Archive 150←Archive 153Archive 154Archive 155Archive 156Archive 157→Archive 160

Anne shinelle bankien

Latest comment: 10 years ago2 comments2 people in discussion

As i havee studied about anne shinelle bankien and i came to know that she is the only one one with that name in the whole world and there are many reasons to get her an importance and let world know about her , as iam new to wikipedia i could not present the article very genuinely but i surely beleive that this article has a great importance to be presented and i will surely improve the page or article. and then click the "Save page" button below -Manish asb (talk) 16:22, 3 October 2014 (UTC)

  Not done - this page was deleted in accordance with criterion for speedy deletion A7. If you believe that this decision was made in error, or that significant new information has come to light since the deletion, please contact the administrator who carried out the deletion, user Alexf (talk · contribs). If you have already done so, your concerns can be taken to deletion review. ~Amatulić (talk) 17:51, 3 October 2014 (UTC)

File:James Georgopoulos, 2014.jpg

Latest comment: 10 years ago2 comments2 people in discussion

Permission for this file was granted through OTRS (#2014071210010678) under CC-BY-SA 3.0. -Anon126 (notify me of responses! / talk / contribs) 17:39, 3 October 2014 (UTC)

  Done, everything looks in order, file restored, permission info modified accordingly. Note that the file is still an orphan and will be deleted if not used soon. ~Amatulić (talk) 17:59, 3 October 2014 (UTC)

My userpage User:DuncanHill

Latest comment: 10 years ago4 comments3 people in discussion

Could a kindly admin please undelete my userpage? Thanks, DuncanHill (talk) 00:42, 3 October 2014 (UTC)

(Moved from ANI) NE Ent 00:53, 3 October 2014 (UTC)

@DuncanHill:   Done, page restored, but not sure why, because it was blank and I though you'd retired. ~Amatulić (talk) 17:28, 3 October 2014 (UTC)
Thank you. I may be going to restore it to a previous version. I was semi-retired, and I had it deleted because of the behaviour of another editor. DuncanHill (talk) 19:02, 3 October 2014 (UTC)

Freefall (webcomic)

Latest comment: 10 years ago5 comments3 people in discussion

One of the longest-running webcomics on the Internet, Freefall, has been deleted from Wikipedia twice over the years due to lack of notability. I'm placing this back into contention for undeletion one more time, using this as my justification:

"If you are not a fan of Freefall you ought to be. Alas, it really will involve some time because it is a serial story, and the current panels are shocking — that is, they have a total surprise that I do not think many readers saw coming...The story is well developed and very logically constructed. I’d like to see it win a Hugo. It’s really good." -- Dr. Jerry Pournelle, March 2, 2014, http://www.jerrypournelle.com/chaosmanor/forced-sale-of-crimea-learning-math-prince-igor-and-the-hearing-log-continues/

The original AfD discussion: Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Freefall (webcomic) -Modemac (talk) 12:11, 3 October 2014 (UTC)

@Modemac: For articles deleted via AFD, your first step toward restoration should always be to contact the administrator who closed the AFD and deleted the article, in this case Stifle. You may have a decent argument above to suggest that new information now justifies inclusion of the topic in Wikipedia. We won't overturn an AFD by request on this page unless Stifle agrees it's OK. ~Amatulić (talk) 17:47, 3 October 2014 (UTC)
Noted, I'll be contacting hiim. -- Modemac (talk) 19:31, 3 October 2014 (UTC)
You realise he has no contributions since mid-September, right? There should probably be a fallback in the process if the admin isn't available. Adam Cuerden (talk) 19:37, 3 October 2014 (UTC)
So, send him email or wait. Stifle has been known to be away for extended periods (see contribution history), and there is no deadline here. ~Amatulić (talk) 20:52, 3 October 2014 (UTC)

Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Pagemodo

Latest comment: 10 years ago2 comments2 people in discussion

(talk) 19:26, 3 October 2014 (UTC)

  Done - as an Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13, the page has been restored on request. Please edit the page to address the issues raised when it was declined, and re-submit it; "Articles for creation" is not for the indefinite hosting of material found to be unsuitable for inclusion in the encyclopedia.
That article is a long way from being accepted. It looks too much like an advertisement, has too many embedded external links instead of references, and doesn't show evidence of significant coverage by multiple independent reliable sources. ~Amatulić (talk) 20:57, 3 October 2014 (UTC)

User:Arlington row/sandbox

Latest comment: 10 years ago2 comments2 people in discussion

I, Arlington row, request the undeletion of this Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page as I intend to work on it. Arlington row (talk) 21:28, 3 October 2014 (UTC)

  Done - as an Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13, the page has been restored on request. Please edit the page to address the issues raised when it was declined, and re-submit it; "Articles for creation" is not for the indefinite hosting of material found to be unsuitable for inclusion in the encyclopedia. ~Amatulić (talk) 23:04, 3 October 2014 (UTC)

Televidenye Thedkunghat

Latest comment: 10 years ago3 comments2 people in discussion

Enter your reasoning here and then click the "Save page" button below -phineas flynn (talk) 07:22, 4 October 2014 (UTC)

  •   Not done This is currently up for deletion at AfD at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Televidenye Thedkunghat. You will need to go there to argue for inclusion. However, I do note that your username is a COI since it kind of insinuates that you are editing on behalf of an organization (Phinbella Micronation Television) so I am going to block that account name. You will have to either create a new account that represents you as a person or request an unblock with a new username. Also, since there is potential that this station is a hoax, you will need to show evidence that this TV service exists as well as to show notability. Tokyogirl79 (｡◕‿◕｡) 09:44, 4 October 2014 (UTC)

Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/False Production

Latest comment: 10 years ago2 comments2 people in discussion

I, Habatchii, request the undeletion of this Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page as I intend to work on it. Habatchii (talk) 05:14, 4 October 2014 (UTC)

  Done - as an Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13, the page has been restored on request. Please edit the page to address the issues raised when it was declined, and re-submit it; "Articles for creation" is not for the indefinite hosting of material found to be unsuitable for inclusion in the encyclopedia.--S Philbrick(Talk) 13:00, 4 October 2014 (UTC)

Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Experimental Sonic Machines

Latest comment: 10 years ago2 comments2 people in discussion

I, Peterkrollings, request the undeletion of this Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page as I intend to work on it. Peterkrollings (talk) 12:55, 4 October 2014 (UTC)

  Done - as an Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13, the page has been restored on request. Please edit the page to address the issues raised when it was declined, and re-submit it; "Articles for creation" is not for the indefinite hosting of material found to be unsuitable for inclusion in the encyclopedia.--S Philbrick(Talk) 13:02, 4 October 2014 (UTC)

Tony Sargeant page requests for undeletion

Latest comment: 10 years ago2 comments2 people in discussion

I wish to edit and resubmit this page as I believe it is worthy of a wiki entry and has the same if not more relevance to similar pages already in existence. such as 'Patricia Hendricks' -Nrp62 (talk) 11:55, 4 October 2014 (UTC)

jay sharda construction

Latest comment: 10 years ago2 comments2 people in discussion

it's give information to contact to their services -122.175.160.46 (talk) 10:00, 4 October 2014 (UTC)

  Not done - this article has not been restored because it does not appear to meet our guidelines for inclusion of articles about companies. In general, Wikipedia considers a topic to be notable if there exist multiple reliable sources of information on the topic, external to the subject itself. Articles concerning companies will be deleted on sight if they are considered to be unambiguous advertising or promotion, or if they do not contain a credible assertion of the significance of the subject. As per the request above, this reason is exactly what Wikipedia is not about the panda ₯’ 17:24, 4 October 2014 (UTC)

explosiv_skis

Latest comment: 10 years ago2 comments2 people in discussion

This is the official Explosif firmdescription from the company founder childrens. It was translated from the romanian and hungarian languages and therefore there was no reference. Only the official english website was added -Ferry sz (talk) 19:32, 4 October 2014 (UTC)

  Not done. It wasn't deleted for lack of sources (although that could have been a reason to delete it), it was deleted for being an advertisement. It doesn't matter that it was a translation. It is not acceptable for the English Wikipedia without a complete re-write. Also, it is best that people associated with the company refrain from writing about it on Wikipedia, in compliance with our WP:COI guideline. ~Amatulić (talk) 20:17, 4 October 2014 (UTC)

Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Move Commons (2)

Latest comment: 10 years ago2 comments2 people in discussion

I, Samer.hc, request the undeletion of this Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page as I intend to work on it. Samer.hc (talk) 14:09, 4 October 2014 (UTC)

  Done - as an Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13, the page has been restored on request. Please edit the page to address the issues raised when it was declined, and re-submit it; "Articles for creation" is not for the indefinite hosting of material found to be unsuitable for inclusion in the encyclopedia. ~Amatulić (talk) 20:19, 4 October 2014 (UTC)

File:Spinning under the Zilker Holiday Tree.JPG

Latest comment: 10 years ago2 comments2 people in discussion

This image along with "File:Zilker Holiday Tree.JPG" and "File:Standing under the Zilker Holiday Tree.jpg" were removed, because (according to my talk page) I had failed to provide enough information about their source. I took these pictures myself, and am willing to give Wikipedia permission to use it. I will just need help in how to get these pictures back in the article. Sorry it has taken me years to notice that further action was needed. I guess I had not logged into wikipedia with my user name for a while. -Matt Graham (talk) 02:52, 5 October 2014 (UTC)

"Permission for Wikipedia to use it" is not sufficient. You must either declare that the photo is in the public domain, or release it under an allowable free license. If you want it in the public domain, say so and I can restore it with that information. If you want to release it irrevocably under a free license like CC-by-SA or GFDL, you must send an email to permissions-en@wikimedia.org using WP:CONSENT as a template. If the image is published anywhere else, you must prove your identity as the photographer too. ~Amatulić (talk) 03:58, 5 October 2014 (UTC)

Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/AADS (IXP)

Latest comment: 10 years ago2 comments2 people in discussion

I, Rrostie, request the undeletion of this Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page as I intend to work on it. Rrostie (talk) 22:57, 4 October 2014 (UTC)

  Not done since this is claimed to be a copyright infringement of https://www.pch.net/peering/www.aads.net/MLPA.html it will not be restored. If you think it is not please explain why. Graeme Bartlett (talk) 11:39, 5 October 2014 (UTC)

Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Another Prayer at Jordan-Hare

Latest comment: 10 years ago2 comments2 people in discussion

Bozaira (talk) 15:24, 5 October 2014 (UTC)

  Done - as an Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13, the page has been restored on request. Please edit the page to address the issues raised when it was declined, and re-submit it; "Articles for creation" is not for the indefinite hosting of material found to be unsuitable for inclusion in the encyclopedia. ~Amatulić (talk) 16:09, 5 October 2014 (UTC)

Draft:Years & Years

Latest comment: 10 years ago3 comments2 people in discussion

The article was deleted for copyright infringement, when I in fact wrote the description on last.fm (it made sense to use the bio i'd written for Wikipedia). I think the problem therefore is that last.fm went live before the article was reviewed on Wikipedia. I am the author of the last.fm bio, meaning there is no copyright infringement. This being the case, is there any way that this can be undeleted? -Jamellis (talk) 13:47, 1 October 2014 (UTC)

  Not done @Jamellis: This was requested before, above, and the request was declined. There is no way copyrighted material can be restored unless the Wikimedia Foundation knows that the content is released under an acceptable free license. Yes, it was a copyright violation because it duplicated content from another website, and we can't rely on the word of some random user account claiming they own the copyright and therefore need no permission to reproduce the content here.
If you wrote it originally, you can write it again in different words.
Or, you can post a notice on the last.fm page that the content is public domain, or releasable under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 3.0 Unported license. ~Amatulić (talk) 22:25, 2 October 2014 (UTC)

OK - i've added a statement at the bottom of the last.fm page: http://www.last.fm/music/Years+&+Years/+wiki — Preceding unsigned comment added by Jamellis (talk • contribs) 09:50, 6 October 2014 (UTC)

The Black Doves BD

Latest comment: 10 years ago4 comments3 people in discussion

The Black Doves BD is a band of Bangladesh where some teenagers working.The have established the band with their hard work.So please solve my article about them to help them.I am new in here.So i can't make it.I already requested some editors to help me.But nobody helped me.So please help me to make our Band more well known.And sorry for my weakness on English.Please sir,help us. -Age0948 (talk) 15:08, 5 October 2014 (UTC)

Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/American Journal of Experimental and Clinical Research

Latest comment: 10 years ago3 comments3 people in discussion

Ajecr (talk) 12:50, 2 October 2014 (UTC)

@Ajecr: Change your username first, as has been requested of you on your talk page, a request that you have ignored. Organizations cannot have Wikipedia accounts. An account must represent only one person as an individual. You can specify "yourname at AJECR" for a new username if you wish to retain the connection with your organization. Go to WP:CHU/Simple to request the change. Then we can entertain your request to restore an article draft that has been repeatedly rejected already. Show us you're serious. ~Amatulić (talk) 22:06, 2 October 2014 (UTC)
@Ajecr: Please do not add more requests to the bottom of the page. Making more requests is unnecessary and you only need to ask once. If you want to draw more attention to your request, you can always ping one of the administrators that has previously responded to the request by writing {{ping|username}}. Also, I note that your username change has been rejected because it was already taken, so you will need to choose a new one. I'd recommend "Masad at AJECR", as it would pass our username guidelines and would likely not be already taken. Tokyogirl79 (｡◕‿◕｡) 10:03, 6 October 2014 (UTC)

Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Statistical Implicative Analysis

Latest comment: 10 years ago3 comments2 people in discussion

I, Carcariass, request the undeletion of this Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page as I intend to work on it. Carcariass (talk) 05:23, 6 October 2014 (UTC)

@Carcariass: On a side note, I've moved it to Draft:Statistical Implicative Analysis as the titles for AfC submissions has changed. Also, the page was a little on the technical side, so you will likely need to add in or re-write the content to include layman's terms. Tokyogirl79 (｡◕‿◕｡) 10:08, 6 October 2014 (UTC)

Salomée Trudel

Latest comment: 10 years ago3 comments2 people in discussion

I need to retrieve the material -HatchCloud (talk) 05:51, 6 October 2014 (UTC)

  • @HatchCloud: The article has multiple issues. The article doesn't really show how she merits an article, but most importantly the article was written in a very promotional manner, which is likely because it would be considered WP:COPYVIO from this site. Please understand that we cannot accept material that has been published elsewhere, regardless of whether or not it is in another language. Since the article was so closely paraphrased from the French source, there's not much we could give you from the English translation that isn't already in the French article and you'd still have to re-write the piece as a whole in order to meet our neutrality and copyright guidelines, so I'm not sure how much help that would be. I can e-mail you a copy of the English version, but we cannot restore it. If you want a copy, just reply here with {{ping|Tokyogirl79}} Tokyogirl79 (｡◕‿◕｡) 10:13, 6 October 2014 (UTC)

Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Green Star Media Ltd

Latest comment: 10 years ago2 comments2 people in discussion

I, Rugbyboy2, request the undeletion of this Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page as I intend to work on it. Rugbyboy2 (talk) 14:32, 6 October 2014 (UTC)

  Done - as an Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13, the page has been restored on request. Please edit the page to address the issues raised when it was declined, and re-submit it; "Articles for creation" is not for the indefinite hosting of material found to be unsuitable for inclusion in the encyclopedia.. GB fan 14:42, 6 October 2014 (UTC)

Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Radio Amateurs of Northern Vermont

Latest comment: 10 years ago3 comments3 people in discussion

I, W1sj, request the undeletion of this Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page as I intend to work on it. W1sj (talk) 05:16, 5 October 2014 (UTC)

Also, Wisj, as a local club, not even a statewide-organization, it is very unlikely to ever be able to show notability with references providing substantial coverage from third-party independent reliable sources, not press releases or mere announcements. DGG ( talk ) 14:49, 6 October 2014 (UTC)

Declan Cassidy

Latest comment: 10 years ago2 comments2 people in discussion

I was opening the Declan Cassidy page to update it and found it deleted. Cassidy is a multi award winning Irish film maker as can be verified here http://www.imdb.com/name/nm2641541/ Apologies for not updating more regularly. If the page is restored there are updates I wish to make to cover the film maker's activity over the past year or so. Thank you -Sharpejourno (talk) 16:15, 6 October 2014 (UTC)

  •   Done. I've restored the article and replaced the deletion tag. What it basically means is that an article on a living person has to have at least one reliable independent source or it will be deleted. Right now adding such a source is more important than updating the profile for newer films. Once a source has been added you may remove the tag yourself or ask someone else to do it (asking in this thread will work fine or you can leave a message on my talk page). I've also toned down some of the wording, as the old revisions were much too promotional for Wikipedia. We want to clearly and neutrally summarize the verifiable facts about a subject. If the article looks like it could just as easily be on the "about page" for their official website, it's probably too promotional. Protonk (talk) 16:32, 6 October 2014 (UTC)

CMP225

Latest comment: 10 years ago2 comments2 people in discussion

We had to create this for our class. This is a sample page. If it is deleted we will lose our grade. We edit it on wednesday to add content but i wanted at create a starter page so we can quickly access and edit it. -DennisCMP225 (talk) 18:42, 6 October 2014 (UTC)

  •   Done It's now at User:DennisCMP225/Cmp225. I'm not sure who suggested you write a sample page like that but if you want to edit something and not worry about how it looks or (mostly) what it covers you can always use your sandbox (see the link at the top of your page) or write on your user page. Protonk (talk) 18:47, 6 October 2014 (UTC)

Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Four Star Aviation

Latest comment: 10 years ago2 comments2 people in discussion

I, 2601:6:E00:6D0:90D2:AD5D:B8FA:31C5, request the undeletion of this Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page as I intend to work on it. 2601:6:E00:6D0:90D2:AD5D:B8FA:31C5 (talk) 18:18, 6 October 2014 (UTC)

  •   Done - as an Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13, the page has been restored on request. Please edit the page to address the issues raised when it was declined, and re-submit it; "Articles for creation" is not for the indefinite hosting of material found to be unsuitable for inclusion in the encyclopedia.
  • I will say that the declining reason was pretty accurate. The copy as it stands is pretty promotional. Protonk (talk) 18:50, 6 October 2014 (UTC)

Peter Leo

Latest comment: 10 years ago2 comments2 people in discussion

Peter Leo is a prominent emcee/singer. His information and accomplishments in the entertainment world should be included in Wikipedia. Please restore this page so it can be updated with more references. -24.163.112.51 (talk) 19:42, 6 October 2014 (UTC)

  Not done - this Requests for Undeletion process is only for articles that were deleted uncontroversially, and does not apply to articles deleted after a deletion discussion. Since the article you are here about was deleted after a discussion took place at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Peter Leo, it cannot be undeleted through this process. However, if you believe that the outcome of the discussion did not reflect the consensus of the participants, or that significant new information has come to light since the article was deleted, you may contact the administrator who closed the discussion. After you do so, if your concerns are not addressed and you still seek undeletion, a request may be made at deletion review. the panda ₯’ 19:53, 6 October 2014 (UTC)

Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Free Thought University

Latest comment: 10 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

I, 50.153.130.131, request the undeletion of this Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page as I intend to work on it. 50.153.130.131 (talk) 23:16, 6 October 2014 (UTC)

Free Thought University

Latest comment: 10 years ago2 comments2 people in discussion

I didn't work on the article properly. Now I want to correct mistakes and make this article to be according to the Wikipedia rules -50.153.130.131 (talk) 23:23, 6 October 2014 (UTC)

  Not done and will not be done because the page never existed. Please scroll up just a little bit to find the Articles for Creation page for the Free Thought University, which has been restored at your request. Nyttend (talk) 01:44, 7 October 2014 (UTC)

American Fashion Podcast

Latest comment: 10 years ago2 comments2 people in discussion

I'm not sure the reason stated for deletion of this page is accurate or fair. The reason stated was "unambiguous advertising," and "and would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become encyclopedic," but I don't think I was promoting anything, I just wanted to document the series and have a list of the guests all in one place. I copied the format almost exactly from The Nerdist Podcast page (The Nerdist Podcast), and I can't see any major difference in what I posted and how that is set up. American Fashion Podcast exists, it's has 20 episodes and adds more weekly, and it has three hosts... I really was not trying to promote the show, I just want a public record of its existence. -Fashiontechguru (talk) 23:49, 6 October 2014 (UTC)

  Not done. The template you used to set up the article is not relevant here. It is also not relevant what WP:OTHERSTUFF might exist on Wikipedia; each article stands or falls on its own merits independent of any other article. Your very own words "I just want a public record of its existence" indicate that the article existed only for publicity purposes. This was further indicated by the fact that no evidence of significant coverage by multiple reliable independent sources was provided (unlike The Nerdist Podcast which is well-sourced), only an iTunes link. ~Amatulić (talk) 03:51, 7 October 2014 (UTC)

2011 in Australian literature

Latest comment: 10 years ago3 comments2 people in discussion

I request the undeletion of this Wikipedia page deleted under CSD G13.

As a result of the deletion discussion, this page was merged into 2011 in literature in January 2014. As the creator of the pages 2003 in Australian literature...2010 in Australian literature I have now created a new version of the page that matches the level of information contained in the earlier pages. As such I would like to re-instate the 2011 page and de-merge it from 2011 in literature. Perry Middlemiss (talk) 04:57, 6 October 2014 (UTC)

  Not done Wikipedia talk:2011 in Australian Literature has never existed. Would you please check the links you've given? Ping me when you've corrected the links, and I'll come back to help. Nyttend (talk) 01:47, 7 October 2014 (UTC)

@Nyttend: I see the problem. I was asking for the Talk page to be undeleted when actually I meant the Article page "2011 in Australian literature". Revision history of that page can be found here: Talk:2011 in literature. Perry Middlemiss (talk) 22:06, 7 October 2014 (UTC)

Carl Goldberg Products

Latest comment: 10 years ago3 comments2 people in discussion

Notable and important company in the field of model aviation -50.130.143.219 (talk) 04:51, 7 October 2014 (UTC)

I agree.   Done - as a contested proposed deletion, the article has been restored on request. ~Amatulić (talk) 13:47, 7 October 2014 (UTC)
And now, unfortunately, it's been nominated for deletion at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Carl Goldberg Products. Too bad. I built many of Goldberg's kits as a kid. I suspect available coverage of this company existed pre-internet, though. ~Amatulić (talk) 22:19, 7 October 2014 (UTC)

MR.UNIVERSAL AMBASSADOR

Latest comment: 10 years ago4 comments2 people in discussion

Enter your reasoning here and then click the "Save page" button below -MR UNIVERSAL AMBASSADOR (talk) 05:45, 8 October 2014 (UTC) The purposeof articleis to tell viewer about new event that will be held by Youth Foundation in Indonesia

This article is very important to tell young generation about annual event that will be held by youth foundation in Indonesia, we do hope you restore it -MR UNIVERSAL AMBASSADOR (talk) 05:48, 8 October 2014 (UTC)

  • We don't restore A7 articles, but this article also had issues with promotion as well and could have been deleted under WP:G11. I'll be honest: it's very, very unlikely that this will ever be restored as it was originally written. What also doesn't help is that it doesn't seem like you've ever held an actual pageant so far. The existence of a company, organization, or event does not automatically mean that it passes notability guidelines as existence is not notability. I would suggest that you wait until the event is held and gains substantial coverage in independent and reliable sources. So far I don't really see where the pageant has truly received any in-depth coverage to show that it is ultimately notable enough for an entry. Tokyogirl79 (｡◕‿◕｡) 05:56, 8 October 2014 (UTC)

Film Cafe

Latest comment: 10 years ago2 comments2 people in discussion

Because Filmcafe is an film school in India which offers courses of

  • Acting
  • Directing
  • Cinematography
  • Editing
  • Writing
  • Producing

to the fresher who want to get into the Indian film industry. It is founded in 2013. so i do not think that this article must be deleted because it is an valid article. Thank you. -Amberkul (talk) 04:35, 8 October 2014 (UTC)

  •   Not done This article was deleted as WP:G11, unambiguous promotion. It would have to be substantially re-written in order to pass our neutrality guidelines. Even then, I don't really see where this school is ultimately notable enough to merit an entry. It exists (WP:ITEXISTS), but existing is not notability and we cannot keep an article simply because it would be useful (WP:ITSUSEFUL). You can re-write it, but you will have to show how the school has received coverage in independent and reliable sources. Tokyogirl79 (｡◕‿◕｡) 06:05, 8 October 2014 (UTC)

Patrick Hoban

Latest comment: 10 years ago2 comments2 people in discussion

It was originally deleted as "However, Patrick Hoban has still not received significant coverage or played in a fully pro league". Well he has now played two full seasons in the Irish league and has just won the Irish league cup. He was also named in the team of the year last year. These were referenced -The Irish Phantom (talk) 15:15, 7 October 2014 (UTC)

Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/陈国龙

Latest comment: 10 years ago3 comments2 people in discussion

I, Wkboy, request the undeletion of this Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page as I intend to work on it. Wkboy (talk) 03:33, 8 October 2014 (UTC)

Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Padmashree S.N.Swamy

Latest comment: 10 years ago2 comments2 people in discussion

I, 1.39.63.221, request the undeletion of this Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page as I intend to work on it. 1.39.63.221 (talk) 07:17, 8 October 2014 (UTC)

  Done - as an Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13, the page has been restored on request. Please edit the page to address the issues raised when it was declined, and re-submit it; "Articles for creation" is not for the indefinite hosting of material found to be unsuitable for inclusion in the encyclopedia. §FreeRangeFrogcroak 17:41, 8 October 2014 (UTC)

Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Mediareach Advertising Ltd.

Latest comment: 10 years ago2 comments2 people in discussion

Would like to edit the abandoned page according to the Wikipedia guideline -81.148.89.81 (talk) 15:27, 8 October 2014 (UTC)

  Done - as an Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13, the page has been restored on request. Please edit the page to address the issues raised when it was declined, and re-submit it; "Articles for creation" is not for the indefinite hosting of material found to be unsuitable for inclusion in the encyclopedia. §FreeRangeFrogcroak 18:04, 8 October 2014 (UTC)

Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Menyenya high school

Latest comment: 10 years ago3 comments2 people in discussion

I, 41.89.160.14, request the undeletion of this Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page as I intend to work on it. 41.89.160.14 (talk) 14:42, 8 October 2014 (UTC)

I, 41.89.160.14, request the undeletion of this Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page as I intend to work on it. 41.89.160.14 (talk) 14:44, 8 October 2014 (UTC)}} i would like to edit the work and bring it to acceptable state -41.89.160.14 (talk) 14:44, 8 October 2014 (UTC)

  Done - as an Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13, the page has been restored on request. Please edit the page to address the issues raised when it was declined, and re-submit it; "Articles for creation" is not for the indefinite hosting of material found to be unsuitable for inclusion in the encyclopedia. §FreeRangeFrogcroak 18:08, 8 October 2014 (UTC)

Wikipedia_talk:Articles_for_creation/_Ahmad_Ali_Barqi_Azmi

Latest comment: 10 years ago2 comments2 people in discussion

(This user used the preload form for AFC undeletion, but did not specify the name of the AFC draft they would like undeleted. Consider checking their deleted contributions.) Sarizvi (talk) 15:42, 8 October 2014 (UTC)

  Done - as an Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13, the page has been restored on request. Please edit the page to address the issues raised when it was declined, and re-submit it; "Articles for creation" is not for the indefinite hosting of material found to be unsuitable for inclusion in the encyclopedia. §FreeRangeFrogcroak 18:09, 8 October 2014 (UTC)

Servicetonic

Latest comment: 10 years ago2 comments2 people in discussion

I've found a table comparing Help Desk Software and there was a lack of information, just wanted to update it with a currant contributor "Save page" button below -Fruterman (talk) 14:18, 8 October 2014 (UTC)

@Fruterman:   Not done - this page was deleted in accordance with criterion for speedy deletion A7. If you believe that this decision was made in error, or that significant new information has come to light since the deletion, please contact the administrator who carried out the deletion. If you have already done so, your concerns can be taken to deletion review. It's a common mistake perhaps, but articles about companies must meet the inclusion guidelines and lists/comparisons generally only include entries for which Wikipedia already has an article. In any case, there's nothing there to restore - it was half a paragraph of unsourced information. If you want to create an article about the company, you should be using a draft or Articles for Creation. §FreeRangeFrogcroak 18:13, 8 October 2014 (UTC)

Thoughts of No Tomorrow

Latest comment: 10 years ago2 comments2 people in discussion

Reason A9 is wrong: this pages is related to the Avatar (Band) -145.226.158.81 (talk) 10:31, 8 October 2014 (UTC)

  Not done For now. The original deletion as A9 was appropriate, because the band article did not exist at that point (March 2009). The second deletion was because someone created and then blanked it. The original content is nothing more than a track listing, and while we have thousands of articles about albums that are nothing but track listings, they must meet the notability guidelines to begin with. If you provide a review or some other reliable source that could be used to establish notability, we can consider restoring it. §FreeRangeFrogcroak 18:18, 8 October 2014 (UTC)

Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/David Kastner

Latest comment: 10 years ago2 comments2 people in discussion

I, 99.250.146.8, request the undeletion of this Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page as I intend to work on it. 99.250.146.8 (talk) 10:45, 7 October 2014 (UTC)

  Done - as an Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13, the page has been restored on request. Please edit the page to address the issues raised when it was declined, and re-submit it; "Articles for creation" is not for the indefinite hosting of material found to be unsuitable for inclusion in the encyclopedia. §FreeRangeFrogcroak 18:21, 8 October 2014 (UTC)

Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Arnie Suntag

Latest comment: 10 years ago2 comments2 people in discussion

I, 68.98.217.146, request the undeletion of this Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page as I intend to work on it. 68.98.217.146 (talk) 04:59, 7 October 2014 (UTC)

  Done - as an Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13, the page has been restored on request. Please edit the page to address the issues raised when it was declined, and re-submit it; "Articles for creation" is not for the indefinite hosting of material found to be unsuitable for inclusion in the encyclopedia. §FreeRangeFrogcroak 18:22, 8 October 2014 (UTC)

Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/North Cascades Conservation Council

Latest comment: 10 years ago2 comments2 people in discussion

I, 97.113.12.116, request the undeletion of this Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page as I intend to work on it. 97.113.12.116 (talk) 22:50, 6 October 2014 (UTC)

  Done - as an Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13, the page has been restored on request. Please edit the page to address the issues raised when it was declined, and re-submit it; "Articles for creation" is not for the indefinite hosting of material found to be unsuitable for inclusion in the encyclopedia. §FreeRangeFrogcroak 18:24, 8 October 2014 (UTC)

Asif Kamawal

Latest comment: 10 years ago3 comments3 people in discussion

refrences and then click the "Save page" button below -Kamawal0008 (talk) 15:28, 6 October 2014 (UTC)

  Note: The page was speedily-deleted under criterion A7. Pages deleted under that criterion are generally not undeleted because they require complete rewrites to be viable encyclopedia articles or because they violate our biographical or fair-use policies. —Jeremy v^_^v Bori! 17:51, 6 October 2014 (UTC)
  Not done Deleted under a criteria that is not eligible for uncontroversial undeletion, and quite honestly the information there looked like a hoax. §FreeRangeFrogcroak 18:25, 8 October 2014 (UTC)

Circe Films

Latest comment: 10 years ago2 comments2 people in discussion

Hey there, I'm completely new to the Wikipedia editing; I tried to contact Alexf a long time, but I couldn't find the page where I could to talk to him... Originally this page was deleted because there was content of promotion of a company placed in the page, I think?

The first problem was that I first made a account that had the company's name CirceFilmsNL, I completely wasn't aware that such pages weren't allowed on Wikipedia, so I made another account; StienetteBosklopper. But then I realised that the name of the new account could also get linked to the company. That's why I made this account, so that I could edit the page on my own name and couldn't be linked with the company, is that illegal?

Back to the main subject; The reason that I want to make a page about this company is that I want to inform what this company is and what they do, not for promotional purposes. I was trying to contact you about how I could make the page to have no promotion in it, how should I formulate the sentences etc? Because I tried to look at other company pages and try to have that on my page.

I hope you will/can help me to get this page online again and hopefully help me to make this page a regular, non illegal one.

Thank you for your time!

Ilia -Ilia932 (talk) 17:11, 8 October 2014 (UTC)

  Not done Unless Jimfbleak (who deleted the article) and Alexf (who created the sockpuppet investigation that involves you) are somehow OK with it. You should go over this guideline very carefully in the meantime. §FreeRangeFrogcroak 18:31, 8 October 2014 (UTC)

Danielboyd

Latest comment: 10 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

New information which makes him more credible and notable. http://www.imdb.com/name/nm0006723/ https://www.facebook.com/DanielBoydAuthor 579,000 ghits when you search for "Daniel Boyd author" -14:32, 8 October 2014 (UTC)Eschaefer2 (talk)

  Not done Although the original AFD is quite old, WP:GHITS, self-published sources and Facebook likes are not indicative of notability. I'd suggest creating a draft and submitting it for review. §FreeRangeFrogcroak 18:37, 8 October 2014 (UTC)

Kim Beasley

Latest comment: 10 years ago2 comments2 people in discussion

We have been correcting errors and making changes, as some of them were made within the last 24 hours. We go in and fix the errors and someone goes behind us and reverses the changes. Kim Beasley's page is not to advertise her or her business. It was put up for people to see can read about her life, where she grew up, where she went to school, and where she has worked and who she has worked for. On top of the successes she has had throughout her career. Can we please get some assistance with this issue? Also can we undo the deletion of the page? Thanks. -Virtualassistexpert (talk) 19:06, 8 October 2014 (UTC)

  Not done The article was deleted after a discussion and thus it's not eligible for undeletion through here. You'll have to contact the deleting admin Black Kite. Before you do that, please clarify who "we" is. I do note Mcguire2014 (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log) and Kbeasley (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log) tag-teamed along with you on this article, and "Virtual Assist" is the name of a company that seems to engage in "social media strategy" or something like that. I might be wrong but I see no disclosure from any of you as required by our conflict of interest guidelines. That would be a good first step. §FreeRangeFrogcroak 19:39, 8 October 2014 (UTC)

europlus sialkot pvt ltd

Latest comment: 10 years ago2 comments2 people in discussion

please create my page and then click the "Save page" button below -Faizanwaqas (talk) 21:08, 8 October 2014 (UTC)

  Not done And won't ever be done. I just blocked your account for block evasion. §FreeRangeFrogcroak 00:54, 9 October 2014 (UTC)

Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Kaitlyn Fritz

Latest comment: 10 years ago3 comments2 people in discussion

I, Skinfarm, request the undeletion of this Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page as I intend to work on it. Skinfarm (talk) 02:34, 9 October 2014 (UTC)

Jan vydra

Latest comment: 10 years ago2 comments2 people in discussion

Enter your reasoning here and then click the "Save page" button below -Jvydra1982 (talk) 20:35, 8 October 2014 (UTC)

We noticed that our article was patrolled by the Wiki team and tagged for speedy deletion as it was about a person, the person that it was about is a young business man that was the Australian Young farmer of the year, noted in the Age news print in the top 100 most infulencial people in Melbourne, Victoria.

This person is bring a huge amount of positive change to a stagnant industry and we draft this article to give people further access to his biography. We posted this as a first entry and will be updating over the next 2 days.

We believe that this article is not only supported by credible references but the person is a person of interest and will continue to be a person of interest into the future. Wikipedia has a 1000s of personal bio's including some of Jan Vydra colleagues ; Rob Gell, Max Walker and many more.

Please untag consider untagging this article for deletion.

  •   Not done This isn't currently up for deletion at this point. It was up for an WP:A7 speedy (non-notable person) and while that has been declined by another editor, I would recommend editing the article for tone and adding more reliable sources. The article has a fairly promotional bent and could be speedied as spam. Even if it's not, it's still possible for others to seek deletion via WP:AfD. Tokyogirl79 (｡◕‿◕｡) 04:22, 9 October 2014 (UTC)

Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/1971 (documentary film)

Latest comment: 10 years ago4 comments2 people in discussion

(This user used the preload form for AFC undeletion, but did not specify the name of the AFC draft they would like undeleted. Consider checking their deleted contributions.) Dsvarga (talk) 19:56, 8 October 2014 (UTC)

  • @Dsvarga: On a side note, I do want to encourage you to re-write several parts of the article. Much of it appears to be very close copyvio of the IMDb page. Even if you have permission from the director to use the synopsis, I'd still recommend re-writing it in your own words. Also, I'd recommend looking for more and better sources. One of the sources doesn't really mention the documentary at all while at least one of the others only mentions it in passing. The other two pretty much say the same thing, so some might argue that this doesn't show a true depth of coverage. If you can find some reviews, that would help out immensely. Also, I've moved it to Draft:1971 (documentary film), as we now put AfC submissions under "Draft" headings. Tokyogirl79 (｡◕‿◕｡) 04:26, 9 October 2014 (UTC)

Section 4 (NYSPHSAA)

Latest comment: 10 years ago3 comments3 people in discussion

The article was received a Speedy. The deciding admin did not even leave a signature to tell us who done it. Two editors, myself and Prisencolinensinainciusol request its restoration. We would defend its notability aggressively in AfD. Hopefully it doesn't need to come to that. Now that I am aware of the situation I can make sure there are sufficient sources to display its notability, as I am currently doing on other equally notable, related sections of the NYSPHSAA. Trackinfo (talk) 07:29, 9 October 2014 (UTC)

  Note: The page was speedily-deleted under criterion A7. Pages deleted under that criterion are generally not undeleted because they require complete rewrites to be viable encyclopedia articles or because they violate our biographical or fair-use policies. According to the deletion log, it was RHaworth (talk · contribs) that deleted the page. An A7 is more a claim that the article did not express why the subject is notable rather than a claim it's not notable, and so A7s are not undeleted since such articles would generally need a fundamental rewrite to explain why the subject is notable. —Jeremy v^_^v Bori! 09:13, 9 October 2014 (UTC)
  • If you can supply two substantial, independent and reliable writings on the topic I will bring it back. The page said nothing important about the organisation, nor were there any references. Graeme Bartlett (talk) 09:53, 9 October 2014 (UTC)
Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:Requests_for_undeletion/Archive_155&oldid=1138663783"