Wikipedia

Wikipedia:Requests for undeletion/Archive 156

< Wikipedia:Requests for undeletion
Latest comment: 10 years ago by Amatulic in topic Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Dornacilla Drysdale (Peck)
Archive 150←Archive 154Archive 155Archive 156Archive 157Archive 158→Archive 160

Draft:Zenon Software

Latest comment: 10 years ago2 comments2 people in discussion

In attempting to secure OTRS permission (#2014091510008896, I have been informed that the page that was said to have been copied was actually copied from Freebase, which in turn was taken from Wikipedia (back when the article was in mainspace). If this is true, then it's a clear case of {{backwardscopy}}. -Anon126 (notify me of responses! / talk / contribs) 16:32, 8 October 2014 (UTC)

Creating Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Ensequence

Latest comment: 10 years ago3 comments3 people in discussion

The Company I work for, Ensequence, has been around for greater than 10 years. I'm not sure as to why the page is deleted but I'm trying to reinforced our Wikipedia presence now -50.201.77.2 (talk) 18:07, 6 October 2014 (UTC)

What edits would you make to ensure the article gets accepted? Articles for creation is not for the indefinite housing of material unsuitable for an encyclopedia. —Jeremy v^_^v Bori! 18:16, 6 October 2014 (UTC)
Jeremy - G13 deletes can be restored one time with no questions asked, so no need for you to give 50.201.77.2 a hard time here. Graeme Bartlett (talk)

Carrapide.com

Latest comment: 10 years ago2 comments2 people in discussion

This article is about one of the most popular website of Senegal, who revolutionnized the web in that country, opening to new opportunities and legalizing a whole industy of Senegalese film distribution -Assane101 (talk) 12:56, 9 October 2014 (UTC)

  Not done - this page was deleted in accordance with criterion for speedy deletion A7. If you believe that this decision was made in error, or that significant new information has come to light since the deletion, please contact the administrator who carried out the deletion. If you have already done so, your concerns can be taken to deletion review. ~Amatulić (talk) 14:32, 9 October 2014 (UTC)

The Rest (band)

Latest comment: 10 years ago2 comments2 people in discussion

The Rest (band) · ( talk | logs | links | watch ) · [revisions] Template added for Ianmj. Protonk (talk) 14:42, 9 October 2014 (UTC)

  Not done - this page was deleted in accordance with criterion for speedy deletion A7. If you believe that this decision was made in error, or that significant new information has come to light since the deletion, please contact the administrator who carried out the deletion, user Malik Shabazz (talk · contribs). If you have already done so, your concerns can be taken to deletion review. ~Amatulić (talk) 14:47, 9 October 2014 (UTC)

pankaj ajrawer

Latest comment: 10 years ago3 comments3 people in discussion

This is very important for me because my microsoft verified certification link with this and helpfull for me for related to my job and work -Pandit pankaj (talk) 15:06, 9 October 2014 (UTC)

(Non-administrator comment) Based on requestor's talk page, probably actually referring to Pankaj sharma haryana which was deleted per CSD A7 and G11. --Finngall talk 15:32, 9 October 2014 (UTC)
  Not done. No page by the requested name has ever existed, and the article Pankaj sharma haryana is ineligible for restoration by request because it was deleted in accordance with WP:CSD#A7 and WP:CSD#G11. Also, the requester has not provided a valid rationale for restoration; any personal benefit from the existence of this article is emphatically not an argument for restoration. ~Amatulić (talk) 17:56, 9 October 2014 (UTC)

Joseph W. Belluck

Latest comment: 10 years ago2 comments2 people in discussion

I, Rcpadgett, request the undeletion of this Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page as I intend to work on it. Rcpadgett (talk) 16:39, 9 October 2014 (UTC)

  Done - as an Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13, the page has been restored on request. Please edit the page to address the issues raised when it was declined, and re-submit it; "Articles for creation" is not for the indefinite hosting of material found to be unsuitable for inclusion in the encyclopedia. ~Amatulić (talk) 17:58, 9 October 2014 (UTC)

Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Dynasty (Hip Hop Artist)

Latest comment: 10 years ago2 comments2 people in discussion

I, Dreampusher, request the undeletion of this Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page as I intend to work on it. Dreampusher (talk) 16:50, 9 October 2014 (UTC)

Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/The Last Year

Latest comment: 10 years ago2 comments2 people in discussion

I, Unitednut, request the undeletion of this Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page as I intend to work on it. Unitednut (talk) 17:02, 9 October 2014 (UTC)


I would like to have it restored since the band will be relasing new material shortly and I plan to edit re-submit the entry

பெங்களூர் சிட்டி - எர்ணாகுளம் இன்டர்சிட்டி எக்ஸ்பிரஸ் - Restore request

Latest comment: 10 years ago4 comments4 people in discussion

Hi, This is the Tamil version of the page Bangalore City - Ernakulam Intercity Express. But I don't know how to make other language versions of a English page. I think because of default assignment of this page as English, this was detected as duplicate. So I request you to restore this page as Tamil version of Bangalore City - Ernakulam Intercity Express page and link these two pages. -Karthik (talk) 08:07, 9 October 2014 (UTC)

Admins at English Wikipedia have absolutely no powers over pages on other projects (in this case, ta.wp), and if the page requested was made here, we do not restore non-English articles. If the former, please request undeletion at whatever the relevant noticeboard is at ta.wp (likely the WP:Administrators' noticeboard equivalent) or, if that page sees little activity, at meta; if the latter, sorry. —Jeremy v^_^v Bori! 09:07, 9 October 2014 (UTC)
  Done It was deleted off English Wikipedia, but is not suitable for English. But I have copied the content to this page Please improve the page there. Graeme Bartlett (talk) 09:48, 9 October 2014 (UTC)
FYI, @Graeme Bartlett, I formatted that link so the page won't scroll horizontally. Protonk (talk) 22:51, 9 October 2014 (UTC)

Mesut Kurtis

Latest comment: 10 years ago6 comments4 people in discussion

The deleted page is Mesut Kurtis. He is a Macedonian of Turkish origins singer who has three music albums and sings in Arabic, English, and Turkish. He has a Wiki page in Arabic and Turkish and he has 798,000 results on google (in English only). His albums are being sold on itunes and Amazon.com, and he is giving concerts in France and UK in October 2014. Last music clip was featuring artist Maher Zain. Why is his page prevented from creation again then?

Please note that the administrator who protected the page on wiki is no longer available here. -Halslomy (talk) 13:36, 9 October 2014 (UTC)

@Halslomy: The page was prevented from recreation because it was deleted as a result of a deletion discussion (see Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Mesut Kurtis), and recreated multiple times after that, and one of the recreations included copyright infringement. The page was protected from recreation to prevent further similar disruption.
I'm willing to grant that this person has attained notability since the deletion of the article in 2008. Would you please explain exactly what criteria in WP:MUSICBIO is met by this artist?
The deleted article was unsourced, only 6 sentences long, and contained promotional fluff, It would be subject to speedy deletion in that form. It would be best to start it from scratch. I can unprotect the page if you're willing to write the article, but I do not see a need to restore the deleted version. ~Amatulić (talk) 14:44, 9 October 2014 (UTC)
  •   Not done, yet. It was protected because the article was restored multiple times (once as a copyright violation). Can you point me to a few sources which cover the subject in sufficient depth? It doesn't matter if they're not in english just so long as they're reliable and independent from the subject (e.g. a biographical article or an article which covers the singer and not just their albums. If we can get some sources together I don't have a problem removing the protection or potentially restoring the page. Protonk (talk) 14:45, 9 October 2014 (UTC)
    As I stated above, I don't object to unprotecting the page if it can be demonstrated that the artist now meets WP:MUSICBIO, but the deleted versions are unsourced G11 material and should not be restored. ~Amatulić (talk) 14:49, 9 October 2014 (UTC)
    Well sure. I'm not an idiot. :) Were I to restore the page I'd just leave those revisions deleted. Protonk (talk) 14:52, 9 October 2014 (UTC)
Hello all, I'm the admin who deleted the copyvio iteration of the page. I have no opinion or knowledge one way or the other on Mesur Kurtis, just noting that my deletion was simply procedural. Best, faithless (speak) 22:52, 9 October 2014 (UTC)

Shloime Gertner

Latest comment: 10 years ago4 comments2 people in discussion

The page was deleted in March 2010 because it did not explain the subject's notability. I have written a new article with reliable sourcing and verification of notability. Yoninah (talk) 22:46, 9 October 2014 (UTC) -Yoninah (talk) 22:46, 9 October 2014 (UTC)

@Yoninah: I have removed the create protection to make way for you to recreate the article but I have not restored the article in its previous state lest it be speedily deleted again. Once you have recreated it, ping me and I can restore the contribution history. ~Amatulić (talk) 23:30, 9 October 2014 (UTC)
  Done, new article looks good, prior deleted history restored. ~Amatulić (talk) 00:07, 10 October 2014 (UTC)
Thanks! Yoninah (talk) 00:42, 10 October 2014 (UTC)

Movim

Latest comment: 10 years ago2 comments2 people in discussion

Movim is an important XMPP based upcoming decentralised social networks. Links are being added as references to its wiki page as data on it increases on the net. Having it's wiki page undeleted would be very helpful, thanks -Vanya (talk) 05:34, 10 October 2014 (UTC)

Norma Foster

Latest comment: 10 years ago2 comments2 people in discussion

I have just started to write this and it is a draft. I moved it to the sandbox "Save page" button below -Wadokata (talk) 19:35, 10 October 2014 (UTC)

  Note: The page isn't deleted, therefore there's no reason to undelete it. Please follow the instructions on the deletion tag in order to contest (if a speedy deletion or prod/stickyprod) or argue against (if a deletion debate) deletion. Please note that stickyprods cannot be undeleted here unless you provide a source. I will confirm that the article is at User:Wadokata/sandbox, but it still is absent sources. —Jeremy v^_^v Bori! 22:42, 10 October 2014 (UTC)

Grabcart.com

Latest comment: 10 years ago2 comments2 people in discussion

I have read your policy and understand it. The content I posted was not an advertisement but just information about the website. We would like to know why it was removed and request for it to be posted back up please. -Jennytomkins (talk) 23:14, 10 October 2014 (UTC)

  Not done. "Just information about the website" means that the article existed for publicity purposes, which is prohibited. Also subjective wording like "wide selection" are certainly promotional. In addition, there was no evidence that the company is notable enough to meet WP:CORP criteria for inclusion, because the article cited zero independent reliable sources whatsoever, making it eligible for speedy deletion in accordance with WP:CSD#A7.
Furthermore, your use of "we" implies that you have a conflict of interest that you have not disclosed, as you agreed to do when you agreed to the Terms of Service when registering your account. Please read WP:COI and abide by it. You may try to submit your article again using the process described at Wikipedia:Articles for creation. But it will not be restored to main article space. ~Amatulić (talk) 23:39, 10 October 2014 (UTC)

Arise (musician)

Latest comment: 10 years ago2 comments2 people in discussion

The article was currently being worked on to meet Wikipedia's expectations. New sources were added and the biography was edited and polished. Please, please restore the page of this exceptional young talent so that I may work on it. Many thanks. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 174.111.86.178 (talk) 00:45, 11 October 2014 (UTC)

  Not done - this Requests for Undeletion process is only for articles that were deleted uncontroversially, and does not apply to articles deleted after a deletion discussion. Since the article you are here about was deleted after a discussion took place at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Arise (musician), it cannot be undeleted through this process. However, if you believe that the outcome of the discussion did not reflect the consensus of the participants, or that significant new information has come to light since the article was deleted, you may contact the administrator who closed the discussion, user Deor (talk · contribs). After you do so, if your concerns are not addressed and you still seek undeletion, a request may be made at deletion review. ~Amatulić (talk) 02:47, 11 October 2014 (UTC)

Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Akash Rajpal

Latest comment: 10 years ago2 comments2 people in discussion

I, Akneal, request the undeletion of this Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page as I intend to work on it. Akneal (talk) 11:10, 10 October 2014 (UTC)

  Done - as an Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13, the page has been restored on request. Please edit the page to address the issues raised when it was declined, and re-submit it; "Articles for creation" is not for the indefinite hosting of material found to be unsuitable for inclusion in the encyclopedia. ~Amatulić (talk) 03:54, 11 October 2014 (UTC)

Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/John Ferry

Latest comment: 10 years ago2 comments2 people in discussion

I, Jill Haigh, request the undeletion of this Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page as I intend to work on it. Jill Haigh (talk) 15:51, 10 October 2014 (UTC)

  Done - as an Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13, the page has been restored on request. Please edit the page to address the issues raised when it was declined, and re-submit it; "Articles for creation" is not for the indefinite hosting of material found to be unsuitable for inclusion in the encyclopedia. ~Amatulić (talk) 03:56, 11 October 2014 (UTC)

User:Jean Po/sandbox2

Latest comment: 10 years ago3 comments2 people in discussion

I, Jean Po, request the undeletion of this Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page as I intend to work on it. Jean Po (talk) 16:59, 10 October 2014 (UTC)


I would like to get the history of this page back.

--Jean Po (talk) 16:59, 10 October 2014 (UTC)

  Done - as an Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13, the page has been restored on request. Please edit the page to address the issues raised when it was declined, and re-submit it; "Articles for creation" is not for the indefinite hosting of material found to be unsuitable for inclusion in the encyclopedia. ~Amatulić (talk) 03:58, 11 October 2014 (UTC)

Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Losing Joe's Place (novel)

Latest comment: 10 years ago5 comments2 people in discussion

I forgot about the article but I believe that it did indeed have merit because most of the other books by the same person have been articled on Wikipedia, which is the free encyclopedia about EVERYTHING, and this award winning book has not yet been. -208.99.128.46 (talk) 00:09, 11 October 2014 (UTC)

  • On a side note, I do want to caution you about a few things. First off, the existence of other articles on Wikipedia (WP:OTHERSTUFFEXISTS) does not automatically mean that all books pass notability guidelines. There have actually been a few AfDs recently for some of Korman's other books, so the argument that because Korman's other books have pages doesn't really hold water. Also, I note that you included a link to Goodreads in the reception section. Please understand that Goodreads is not usable as a reliable source and any reviews on that site should not be placed anywhere in an article. Basically, the site is considered to be a social media site for books and because anyone can sign up and review, it's not usable as a reliable source because it's ultimately self-published. The Wordpress blog review falls under the same lines, as did the Allreaders review. Also, please be aware that the publisher link is considered a WP:PRIMARY source and cannot give notability. Other than that, you do need to state what award the book has won. Not all awards are considered equal and while some awards can give absolute notability (meaning we keep on that basis alone, like a Caldecott Medal) other awards can only give partial notability (akin to a review in a reliable source) while most others give no notability at all. I'm assuming that the award mentioned is the YALSA listing, which can give some notability but not absolute notability. Tokyogirl79 (｡◕‿◕｡) 03:59, 11 October 2014 (UTC)
  • Also, the TeenInk review isn't usable either. If they're published in their magazine we can use them since they do have some editorial oversight, but other than that the site is pretty much one where anyone can submit a review. We can't guarantee that every review and article on that site is edited due to the amount that they publish, but from what I've seen it appears that the ones that are published in their magazine are so we can use those. I used to use the site as a RS myself, but I've had people raise some serious questions about the editorial guidelines on that site so I've stopped using them as a whole. Tokyogirl79 (｡◕‿◕｡) 04:02, 11 October 2014 (UTC)
  • I've done some general cleaning and so far it's pretty weak. I couldn't really find that much out there to show notability, so you will still have to dig pretty heavily for sources. If you can find the link to the SLJ's review then that would help, as the link in the article went to the Horn Book Guide. They're owned by the same people, but they're not considered the same publication when it comes to what they review and so on. I've also moved this to Draft:Losing Joe's Place to fit our new AfC name conventions. Tokyogirl79 (｡◕‿◕｡) 04:29, 11 October 2014 (UTC)

Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Karina Ivanova

Latest comment: 10 years ago2 comments2 people in discussion

I, 107.211.104.44, request the undeletion of this Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page as I intend to work on it. 107.211.104.44 (talk) 09:54, 11 October 2014 (UTC)

Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Cem Sertoglu

Latest comment: 10 years ago2 comments2 people in discussion

I, VCanalyst, request the undeletion of this Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page as I intend to work on it. VCanalyst (talk) 17:00, 11 October 2014 (UTC) wouldlike to get the page back for editing

Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/RadView Software

Latest comment: 10 years ago2 comments2 people in discussion

I, AAriel42, request the undeletion of this Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page as I intend to work on it. AAriel42 (talk) 08:59, 12 October 2014 (UTC)


We'd like to improve the article and provide more reliable references. thanks.

  •   Done - as an Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13, the page has been restored on request. Please edit the page to address the issues raised when it was declined, and re-submit it; "Articles for creation" is not for the indefinite hosting of material found to be unsuitable for inclusion in the encyclopedia. Your user id should represent one person. Do not let other use your logon, They can register themselves instead of using your account. Graeme Bartlett (talk) 09:34, 12 October 2014 (UTC)

Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/RadView Software

Latest comment: 10 years ago2 comments2 people in discussion

I, AAriel42, request the undeletion of this Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page as I intend to work on it. AAriel42 (talk) 10:05, 12 October 2014 (UTC)

@AAriel42: already   Done half an hour ago, see above. JohnCD (talk) 10:16, 12 October 2014 (UTC)

Princess Marie Luise Charlotte of Hesse-Kassel

Latest comment: 10 years ago3 comments3 people in discussion

Princess Marie Luise Charlotte of Hesse-Kassel, (German: Marie Luise Charlotte, Prinzessin von Hessen-Kassel) (9 May 1814, in Copenhagen, Kingdom of Denmark – 28 July 1895, at Schloss Hohenburg in Lenggries, Kingdom of Bavaria) was a member of the House of Hesse-Kassel by birth. Through her marriage to Prince Frederick Augustus of Anhalt-Dessau, Marie Luise Charlotte was also a member of the House of Ascania and a Princess of Anhalt-Dessau. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Afriallifuld2550 (talk • contribs) 12:10, 10 October 2014‎ (UTC)

Comment: The requestor didn't link to the article in question, but I guess that it refers to Landgravine Marie Louise Charlotte of Hesse-Kassel, Landgravine Marie Luise Charlotte of Hesse-Kassel, and hence to Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Princess Marie Luise Charlotte of Hesse-Kassel (which the OP tried to blank), and to Princess Marie Luise Charlotte of Hesse-Kassel (recently re-created after deletion). --David Biddulph (talk) 12:25, 10 October 2014 (UTC)
Article is now at Draft:Princess Marie Luise Charlotte of Hesse-Kassel. JohnCD (talk) 15:26, 12 October 2014 (UTC)

Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Kevin L. Walker

Latest comment: 10 years ago2 comments2 people in discussion

(This user used the preload form for AFC undeletion, but did not specify the name of the AFC draft they would like undeleted. Consider checking their deleted contributions.) Milesyarbra (talk) 17:03, 12 October 2014 (UTC)

Around (disambiguation)

Latest comment: 10 years ago2 comments2 people in discussion

This was probably a redirect to the Around disambiguation page, but was deleted when that was redirected to an article; a valid disambiguation page now exists for it to redirect to. -86.130.209.39 (talk) 19:59, 12 October 2014 (UTC)

Fred Cheng

Latest comment: 10 years ago2 comments2 people in discussion

Enter your reasoning here and then click the "Save page" button below -Hiddenemotions (talk) 02:12, 13 October 2014 (UTC)

I don't see a reason for why it was being deleted. The reason given was that " I am closing this because no more discussion seems to be forthcoming" That does not make sense because there is constant new information for this Hong Kong singer and actor and updating his music career and tv shows.

  Done. The closing admin deemed the deletion equivalent to a WP:PROD deletion, meaning it can be restored on request. ~Amatulić (talk) 03:10, 13 October 2014 (UTC)

Elie Khouri

Latest comment: 10 years ago2 comments2 people in discussion

I, Csamer, request the undeletion of this Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page as I intend to work on it. I'd like to contribute more links and content to the subject -Csamer (talk) 12:00, 13 October 2014 (UTC)

  Done - as an Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13, the page has been restored on request. Please edit the page to address the issues raised when it was declined, and re-submit it; "Articles for creation" is not for the indefinite hosting of material found to be unsuitable for inclusion in the encyclopedia. JohnCD (talk) 14:29, 13 October 2014 (UTC)

File:Highlands School main entrance.JPG

Latest comment: 10 years ago2 comments2 people in discussion

Enter your reasoning here and then click the "Save page" button below -Vhk10 (talk) 12:49, 13 October 2014 (UTC) I am the copyright owner of the image and can edit its licensing status if it is restored.

@Vhk10:   Not done - there is already File:Highlands School, Tilehurst, main entrance.jpg which seems to be the same image, but the right way up; do you need both? JohnCD (talk) 14:43, 13 October 2014 (UTC)

Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Nathan S. Bell

Latest comment: 10 years ago2 comments2 people in discussion

I, Smitty48823, request the undeletion of this Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page as I intend to work on it. Smitty48823 (talk) 14:06, 13 October 2014 (UTC)

@Smitty48823:   Done - as an Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13, the page has been restored on request. Please edit the page to address the issues raised when it was declined, and re-submit it; "Articles for creation" is not for the indefinite hosting of material found to be unsuitable for inclusion in the encyclopedia. JohnCD (talk) 14:57, 13 October 2014 (UTC)

Draft:Alfred Buxton

Latest comment: 10 years ago2 comments2 people in discussion

I, Zohre6, request the undeletion of this Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page as I intend to work on it. Zohre6 (talk) 14:31, 13 October 2014 (UTC)

@Zohre6:   Done - as an Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13, the page has been restored on request. Please edit the page to address the issues raised when it was declined, and re-submit it; "Articles for creation" is not for the indefinite hosting of material found to be unsuitable for inclusion in the encyclopedia. JohnCD (talk) 15:00, 13 October 2014 (UTC)

Haji Springer (Musician)

Latest comment: 10 years ago2 comments2 people in discussion

This article is based on true information and enough sources. Wikipedia don't cares. You just delete every page without any reason its like wasting time on Wikipedia when you delete articles i want my article back please. -175.110.114.141 (talk) 16:43, 13 October 2014 (UTC)

  Not done - this Requests for Undeletion process is only for articles that were deleted uncontroversially, and does not apply to articles deleted after a deletion discussion. Since the article you are here about was deleted after a discussion took place at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Haji Springer, it cannot be undeleted through this process. However, if you believe that the outcome of the discussion did not reflect the consensus of the participants, or that significant new information has come to light since the article was deleted, you may contact the administrator who closed the discussion, user Ron Ritzman (talk · contribs). After you do so, if your concerns are not addressed and you still seek undeletion, a request may be made at deletion review. ~Amatulić (talk) 17:53, 13 October 2014 (UTC)

Luiz Gohara

Latest comment: 10 years ago2 comments2 people in discussion

Deleted by admin without discussion om whether the article was notable or not. -Yankees10 21:47, 13 October 2014 (UTC)

Norlan Brequillo

Latest comment: 10 years ago2 comments2 people in discussion

I'm sorry for posting my details i will fix it -Norlan245 (talk) 11:07, 14 October 2014 (UTC)

  Not done and will not be done. Wikipedia is not a place for people to write about themselves. Please read Wikipedia:Guidance for younger editors. More advice on your talk page. JohnCD (talk) 14:06, 14 October 2014 (UTC)

Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Contingent Network Services

Latest comment: 10 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

I, 66.195.135.152, request the undeletion of this Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page as I intend to work on it. 66.195.135.152 (talk) 17:03, 14 October 2014 (UTC)

ted the slug

Latest comment: 10 years ago2 comments2 people in discussion

ted the slug is a fictional character of which was in a recent play, the slug hound, i have referenced this page in the brochur "Save page" button below -The mighty jimbat (talk) 10:56, 14 October 2014 (UTC)

  Not done. The article will not be restored, as it adds no value to the Wikipedia project. It was deleted as vandalism. Please see Wikipedia:Golden rule to get a better understanding of what is required in an encyclopedia article. ~Amatulić (talk) 17:04, 14 October 2014 (UTC)

Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Tieto TRIP

Latest comment: 10 years ago2 comments2 people in discussion

I, VAV100, request the undeletion of this Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page as I intend to work on it. VAV100 (talk) 11:30, 14 October 2014 (UTC)

  Done - as an Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13, the page has been restored on request. Please edit the page to address the issues raised when it was declined, and re-submit it; "Articles for creation" is not for the indefinite hosting of material found to be unsuitable for inclusion in the encyclopedia. JohnCD (talk) 18:19, 14 October 2014 (UTC)

Anti Tank Guitar

Latest comment: 10 years ago10 comments4 people in discussion

It was a soft delete that lacked discussion. The article facilitated all aspect necessary for notoriety, including: unique musical invention used on many albums released by record labels and contain footnotes to articles. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Eric Tose Brian (talk • contribs) 20:10, 14 October 2014 (UTC)

That isn't how we determine notability. We require multiple references from reliable sources that discuss the subject in depth, are not tied to the subject in any way, and which have editorial oversight. —Jeremy v^_^v Bori! 20:16, 14 October 2014 (UTC)

It Was totally notable for many years on Wiki and now it's not? How does that happen? — Preceding unsigned comment added by Eric Tose Brian (talk • contribs) 20:23, 14 October 2014 (UTC)

Given the presence of the successful AfD and the fact that the sole !vote states the sources they found for it were wanting, calling it "totally notable" is a stretch. The reality is that there's only about 1000 active admins to curate 5,000,000+ articles. —Jeremy v^_^v Bori! 20:33, 14 October 2014 (UTC)

What sources were not credible? To which ones do you refer? There were several. And how is a source a stretch? Isn't "stretch" subjective term? I mean you said, "discuss the subject in depth" what does that entail specifically? — Preceding unsigned comment added by Eric Tose Brian (talk • contribs) 20:40, 14 October 2014 (UTC)

A source is considered reliable if it meets all of the following criteria: (1) It isn't from the subject or a company that owns the subject (if not a person or group), (2) it's not from someone who has a financial, professional/business, or social connection to the subject, (3) it spends at least a paragraph, preferably much more, talking about what the subject is, (4) it has editorial oversight, i.e. an editorial board that fact-checks.
As I'm not an administrator myself (I would have actioned this request if I were) I have no way of knowing what the sources are or their reliability. You would have to ask the !voter (Joe Decker (talk · contribs)) themselves. —Jeremy v^_^v Bori! 20:47, 14 October 2014 (UTC)
(edit conflict) The sources were ISBN 9780946719952 and http://www.sonic-boom.com/review/lab.report-1.html (which has apparently changed over the years so it doesn't mention the subject). The book looks like an autobiography of Chris Connelly but I don't have a preview so I can't tell much else. IMO there's not much indication that the subject is notable, but I haven't done a thorough search. Protonk (talk) 20:53, 14 October 2014 (UTC)

What are we to do? I don’t understand how you can delete it without researching the Connely book where it is discussed. Also you are saying that it is not longer a part of history because the web sources have changed? How much of the world will be lost because of this? This instrument was notable 25 years ago. Yes many of the websites that referred to it are gone. So is it no longer notable?

The New York times maybe a short mention but it was mentioned because it was notable.

http://www.nytimes.com/1992/12/21/arts/review-rock-music-of-the-1990-s-served-60-s-style.html

Was the Sonic Boom review still not enough? You said it doesn't mention it but it does!!!


http://www.sonic-boom.com/review/lab.report-1.html

Other mentions.

http://en.academic.ru/dic.nsf/enwiki/10529470 http://www.intelligentmachinery.net/?page_id=133 http://israblog.nana10.co.il/blogread.asp?blog=590110&blogcode=10303129 http://lensrecords.bandcamp.com/album/mantras http://apexarmouries.bigcartel.com/product/lab-report-classical-atmospheres-self-released http://www.chaindlk.com/reviews/?id=5119 http://en.academic.ru/dic.nsf/enwiki/10384778 http://ghostboxradio.blogspot.com/2014/09/lab-report-terminal-released-1995-lab.html http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Mwz_9zq5Wjw http://www.allacronyms.com/A.T.G./Anti_Tank_Guitar http://acronymsandslang.com/acronym_image/1767/d6802382bcc6f941eff3cb7e7255e043.jpg http://www.thefullwiki.org/Anti_Tank_Guitar

I understand you can’t refer to his sites but… http://matthewschultz.wix.com/antitankguitar#!instruments/cjg9 http://www.mattschultz.com/ http://www.labreport.com/ Eric Tose Brian (talk) 23:48, 14 October 2014 (UTC) Thanks for the info! I appreciate your time. Eric Tose Brian (talk) 20:50, 14 October 2014 (UTC) I still think it's a valid article. Eric Tose Brian (talk) 20:52, 14 October 2014 (UTC)

Also..if you Google Anti Tank Guitar you actually can see a sandbox by Rudolph Steiner who built a page on Wiki for the instrument. THAT'S how many people have searched the Instrument. Eric Tose Brian (talk) 23:55, 14 October 2014 (UTC)

  Done. The AFD closed as a WP:SOFTDELETE, meaning it's not much different than a WP:PROD, therefore it's the type of thing that can be restored on request. However, it needs to be improved or it will likely get deleted again. ~Amatulić (talk) 02:22, 15 October 2014 (UTC)

User:JuvonTaylor

Latest comment: 10 years ago3 comments3 people in discussion

I am Juvon Taylor, and I'm a singer songwriter from Toronto, ON .. listen here www.soundcloud.com/juvontaylor or www.youtube.com/jayteeus, My page should not be deleted. I am very angry about this, I am a real person. "Save page" button below -JuvonTaylor (talk) 20:27, 14 October 2014 (UTC)

  Note: The page was speedily-deleted under criterion G11. Pages deleted under that criterion are generally not undeleted because they require complete rewrites to be viable encyclopedia articles or because they violate our biographical or fair-use policies. We don't permit ANYONE to use Wikipedia for advertisement, and we routinely block accounts that have a pretty severe conflict of interest. —Jeremy v^_^v Bori! 20:36, 14 October 2014 (UTC)
  Not done. Wikipedia is not a social-networking site like Facebook or LinkedIn for people to write about themselves - see Wikipedia is not about YOU. The use of Wikipedia user pages is explained at WP:NOTWEBHOST:

"Wikipedians have their own user pages, but they should be used primarily to present information relevant to working on the encyclopedia. Limited biographical information is allowed, but user pages should not function as personal webpages or be repositories for large amounts of material that is irrelevant to collaborating on Wikipedia. If you are looking to make a personal webpage or blog or to post your résumé, please make use of one of the many free providers on the Internet or any hosting included with your Internet account."

JohnCD (talk) 09:38, 15 October 2014 (UTC)

Masuda Moyeen (মাসউদা মঈন), a writer with only primary education.

Latest comment: 10 years ago2 comments2 people in discussion

Enter your reasoning here and then click the "Save page" button below -119.148.6.206 (talk) 08:38, 15 October 2014 (UTC)

  Done - as an Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13, the page has been restored on request. Please edit the page to address the issues raised when it was declined, and re-submit it; "Articles for creation" is not for the indefinite hosting of material found to be unsuitable for inclusion in the encyclopedia.. Read WP:Your first article for advice and note the need for references to reliable sources such as newspaper reviews - the subject's Facebook page is not enough. Non-English passages need to be translated. JohnCD (talk) 09:48, 15 October 2014 (UTC)

Wahid Kassana

Latest comment: 10 years ago2 comments2 people in discussion

hey! There i am not write wrong information so please don't delete my page -Gree123 (talk) 16:37, 15 October 2014 (UTC)

  Not done. The article isn't deleted (yet), but if it is, the reason for deletion (WP:CSD#A7) would make it ineligible for restoration by request on this page. You would have to talk to the deleting administrator. ~Amatulić (talk) 16:50, 15 October 2014 (UTC)

Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Mitochondrial gene replacement

Latest comment: 10 years ago2 comments2 people in discussion

I, Sotaj, request the undeletion of this Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page as I intend to work on it. Sotaj (talk) 16:09, 15 October 2014 (UTC)

  Done - as an Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13, the page has been restored on request. Please edit the page to address the issues raised when it was declined, and re-submit it; "Articles for creation" is not for the indefinite hosting of material found to be unsuitable for inclusion in the encyclopedia. ~Amatulić (talk) 17:07, 15 October 2014 (UTC)

Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Eco-Leadership

Latest comment: 10 years ago3 comments2 people in discussion

I, Agratia, request the undeletion of this Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page as I intend to work on it. Agratia (talk) 11:02, 15 October 2014 (UTC)

The page has been deleted, because the submission hasn't been edited for over 6 month. I am now ready to edit it according to the requirements. Thank you -Agratia (talk) 11:08, 15 October 2014 (UTC)

  Done - as an Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13, the page has been restored on request. Please edit the page to address the issues raised when it was declined, and re-submit it; "Articles for creation" is not for the indefinite hosting of material found to be unsuitable for inclusion in the encyclopedia. ~Amatulić (talk) 17:08, 15 October 2014 (UTC)

Communist Voice Organization

Latest comment: 10 years ago2 comments2 people in discussion

This page was deleted by user Rjd0060 with three reasons given: No notability, No citations, and Nothing verifiable. The second two reasons are correctable with editing and therefore are not reason for deletion. As for notability: Within the ecosystem of left groupings in the United States the Communist Voice Organization is one of several communist trends which originated during the 1960's, developed under a series of different names, and which continues to exist today. Communist Voice Organization has existed in its current form since 1996, or 18 years. The Communist Voice Organization is alone in its theoretical opposition to Stalin, Mao and Trotsky, while supporting Marx and Lenin. As a result, the Communist Voice Organization takes unique stands on many political questions, and has amassed a large body of theoretical material on their website applying this theoretical position to numerous political issues which arose during the last 18 years, as well as numerous historical questions such as how to understand the development and fall of the former Soviet Union. For these reasons, a page on this organization is useful for researchers studying the United States left ecosystem today. Furthermore, a Google search reveals that 37 other Wikipedia articles reference the organization, and a Google search that is not limited to Wikipedia, but which excludes the Communist Voice Organization's own website: -site:communist voice.org "communist voice organization" results in 56,000 hits. -Ejrd1993 (talk) 17:23, 15 October 2014 (UTC)

@Ejrd1993: I think you misunderstand what "notability" means. It doesn't mean unique. It doesn't have anything to do with the material they've amassed. In Wikipedia terms, Wikipedia:Notability (and for organizations in particular, WP:CORP) means that the organization has received significant coverage (not trivial mentions or directory listings) in reliable sources (not blogs or press releases) that are independent (not associated with) the organization. If you cannot address these concerns, the article will likely be deleted again. For the time being, I have restored it as an expired WP:PROD ~Amatulić (talk) 20:24, 15 October 2014 (UTC)

Draft:New Zealand Field Archery Association

Latest comment: 10 years ago2 comments2 people in discussion

I, 49.224.80.6, request the undeletion of this Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page as I intend to work on it. 49.224.80.6 (talk) 18:45, 15 October 2014 (UTC)

  •   Done - as an Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13, the page has been restored on request. Please edit the page to address the issues raised when it was declined, and re-submit it; "Articles for creation" is not for the indefinite hosting of material found to be unsuitable for inclusion in the encyclopedia. --S Philbrick(Talk) 21:01, 15 October 2014 (UTC)

Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Gabriel Baritulem Pidomson

Latest comment: 10 years ago2 comments2 people in discussion

I, Pastoruzor, request the undeletion of this Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page as I intend to work on it. Pastoruzor (talk) 20:35, 15 October 2014 (UTC)

  •   Done - as an Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13, the page has been restored on request. Please edit the page to address the issues raised when it was declined, and re-submit it; "Articles for creation" is not for the indefinite hosting of material found to be unsuitable for inclusion in the encyclopedia. --S Philbrick(Talk) 21:03, 15 October 2014 (UTC)

User:Peppur/sandbox

Latest comment: 10 years ago2 comments2 people in discussion

I, Peppur, request the undeletion of this Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page as I intend to work on it. Peppur (talk) 18:33, 15 October 2014 (UTC)


Hello,

I've gotten assistance and I'm ready to update the errors I have with my references and would like to complete the page.

Thank you!

Peppur Chambers Brown Betties

  •   Done - as an Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13, the page has been restored on request. Please edit the page to address the issues raised when it was declined, and re-submit it; "Articles for creation" is not for the indefinite hosting of material found to be unsuitable for inclusion in the encyclopedia. --S Philbrick(Talk) 21:44, 15 October 2014 (UTC)

User:Bruno vandevelde/Victor gilsoul

Latest comment: 10 years ago3 comments2 people in discussion

I, Bruno vandevelde, request the undeletion of this Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page as I intend to work on it. Bruno vandevelde (talk) 07:37, 16 October 2014 (UTC)

I've moved the submission to Draft:Victor Gilsoul, as we've changed how we name our draft submissions. Tokyogirl79 (｡◕‿◕｡) 08:56, 16 October 2014 (UTC)

Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Wavemill

Latest comment: 10 years ago3 comments2 people in discussion

I, VDNavarro, request the undeletion of this Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page as I intend to work on it. VDNavarro (talk) 08:04, 16 October 2014 (UTC) I, VDNavarro, request the undeletion of this Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page as I intend to work on it. VDNavarro (talk) 08:04, 16 October 2014 (UTC)

@VDNavarro: I almost didn't restore it due to the very promotional tone in the article, but this does seem like it could be notable. I'd recommend re-writing portions of it substantially before resubmitting this. I've also moved it to Draft:Wavemill per our draft naming conventions. Tokyogirl79 (｡◕‿◕｡) 08:59, 16 October 2014 (UTC)

abdchaudhary

Latest comment: 10 years ago2 comments2 people in discussion

I, Abdchaudhary, request the undeletion of this Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page as I intend to work on it. Abdchaudhary (talk) 11:48, 16 October 2014 (UTC)

  Not done @Abdchaudhary: There has never been any page at that title. Looking at your deleted contributions, did you mean User:Abdchaudhary/sandbox? If so, there's nothing to restore there. The only "content" you ever added to that page was a section header i.e., the sole content was "== Maulana Hamidullah Chaudhary ==" If you want to create a page about that individual (though the fact that the surname is the same as yours makes me think you have a conflict of interest and shouldn't be creating such a page at all) there's no need to restore a blank sandbox. It can just be created anew, this time with actual content.--Fuhghettaboutit (talk) 12:27, 16 October 2014 (UTC)

Iraq News

Latest comment: 10 years ago2 comments2 people in discussion

Enter your reasoning here and then click the "Save page" button below -Jwj335 (talk) 14:13, 16 October 2014 (UTC)

Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Captain Brock: Space Badger

Latest comment: 10 years ago2 comments2 people in discussion

I, Derrin Tanser, request the undeletion of this Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page as I intend to work on it. Derrin Tanser (talk) 15:39, 16 October 2014 (UTC)


We now have references to add. I would like to edit before re submission. I am not able to see the original article, please could you forward this to me.

  •   Done - as an Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13, the page has been restored on request. Please edit the page to address the issues raised when it was declined, and re-submit it; "Articles for creation" is not for the indefinite hosting of material found to be unsuitable for inclusion in the encyclopedia. Your user should only be used by one person. If there is more than one of you there, please register other user accounts for them. Graeme Bartlett (talk) 20:35, 16 October 2014 (UTC)

Delong Padung

Latest comment: 10 years ago2 comments2 people in discussion

Enter your reasoning here and then click the "Save page" button below -WikiCreator1995 (talk) 13:27, 16 October 2014 (UTC)

  •   Not done The "article" was only an infobox that looked as if it may have been copied from another page, complete with inappropriate tags. You can recreate this as a draft with some text that also explains what this means and why it is important. IronGargoyle's deletion reasons look wrong, and A3 or A7 could have been used instead. I would suggest that you work on a draft: Draft:Delong Padung instead. Graeme Bartlett (talk) 20:42, 16 October 2014 (UTC)

Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/ACT Foundation

Latest comment: 10 years ago2 comments2 people in discussion

Page needs to be revised and corrected so that it can be published. Please restore it. Thank you. -Lstevensactfdn (talk) 20:44, 16 October 2014 (UTC)

  •   Done - as an Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13, the page has been restored on request. Please edit the page to address the issues raised when it was declined, and re-submit it; "Articles for creation" is not for the indefinite hosting of material found to be unsuitable for inclusion in the encyclopedia. You will need substantial independent references for this. Graeme Bartlett (talk) 20:50, 16 October 2014 (UTC)

Steven_Nistor

Latest comment: 10 years ago2 comments2 people in discussion

I didn't see the deletion notice in time, I would like to go back and add additional sources. -mike (talk) 23:06, 16 October 2014 (UTC)

  Done, restored as a deleted WP:PROD. I have, however, left the deletion notice on the article, with a new expiration date. If no improvements are made by then, the article will be deleted again. ~Amatulić (talk) 23:47, 16 October 2014 (UTC)

Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Dornacilla Drysdale (Peck)

Latest comment: 10 years ago2 comments2 people in discussion

108.180.206.183 (talk) 02:03, 17 October 2014 (UTC)

  Done - as an Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13, the page has been restored on request. Please edit the page to address the issues raised when it was declined, and re-submit it; "Articles for creation" is not for the indefinite hosting of material found to be unsuitable for inclusion in the encyclopedia. ~Amatulić (talk) 03:02, 17 October 2014 (UTC)
Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:Requests_for_undeletion/Archive_156&oldid=1251717540"