Wikipedia:Requests for undeletion/Archive 154

Archive 150

←

Archive 152

Archive 153

Archive 154

Archive 155

Archive 156

→

Archive 160

MINOS (optimization software)

• MINOS (optimization software) · ( talk | logs | history | links | watch ) · [revisions]

Hi, I'm requesting an un-delete of the page for the software package MINOS (optimization software). While the package itself has not changed much in recent years, it is still heavily used and cited. It is also supported in a number of optimization related packages, including but not limited to, AIMMS, AMPL, and GAMS. It is also one of the first (if not, the first) general-purpose optimization software package to come out. In addition, this software package and its author received the inaugural Beale-Orchard-Hayes prize, awarded by the Mathematical Optimization Society. I would be happy to update the page, if necessary. -75.80.52.214 (talk) 01:29, 23 September 2014 (UTC)

• Done Let me know if you need help with formatting references and what-not. Protonk (talk) 01:46, 23 September 2014 (UTC)

As nominator of the article for deletion, what's necessary is finding and adding independent references that discuss the software in depth. Stuartyeates (talk) 02:46, 23 September 2014 (UTC)

Hi guys, thank you for undeleting the page. I made an effort at updating the page with a high-level description of the software and added references to sources indicating the importance and continued use of the software, as well as links to the documentation and papers related to the software. The page has been given a third-party tag, and I just wanted to ask what else would be required? I've sort of been looking at pages of the other optimization software packages (e.g., KNITRO, IPOPT) as a guideline, but that may not be the best idea. I can try to find scholarly works that reference the software and describe its use in some application, if that helps. Any suggestions would be appreciated. Gnowzil (talk) 18:52, 24 September 2014 (UTC)

@Gnowzil: Here's my immediate suggestion. Draw the page down to the absolute minimum first. What the software is, where it was designed and why it's interesting (e.g. the award). Source that material to reliable sources--the journal articles (namely "Large-scale linearly constrained optimization") work well for this. this may also be helpful as is this if you can find a copy. That gives us a pithy, verifiable summary of the subject. It's not complete or comprehensive but it's a good starting point. Once you have that, you can expand individual elements as you like. A good wikipedia article may not have all the detail on the operation of the software (or it may, it often depends on the sourcing), what we should shoot for is a clear summary for a general reader who wants to know about MINOS. The further reading and external links sections can be used to provide pointers to more detailed resources. Does that help? Protonk (talk) 19:01, 24 September 2014 (UTC)

@Protonk: Thanks Protonk. The article is admittedly terse at the moment, but I think it provides at least a summary of MINOS, which can be expanded on. The article currently starts with a general description of what the software is meant for, citing the user guide for the software as a ref. Then goes into the when/where it was developed, and mentions the prize it was awarded (with a cite to the awarding society's page) and then cites a few sources that discuss the current status/use of the software in modeling systems. The rest of the article gives specifics on implementation and method and cites one of the two refs you provided. I've left the two papers in the Further Reading section, as they are very technical papers describing the method used in MINOS and its implementation. I understand the need for verifiable and neutral sources, but it's odd to me that there needs to be references to third-party sources to describe the software, when it seems that the best and most accurate sources would be the papers and user's guides for the software. If it was a matter of software performance, then yes I definitely agree that third-party references are necessary. Gnowzil (talk) 22:53, 24 September 2014 (UTC)

@Gnowzil: the need for sourcing isn't unique to software, it covers any article on wikipedia. The expectation is not zero "primary" sources but that many of the references on the page be to independent actors. What it allows us to do is write articles any critical reader can verify without relying too much on one particular viewpoint--in many cases we don't want to write an article on a web site or an actor using their own (potentially promotional) material. This seems like less of a problem with software, especially older software developed by academics, but it's a good rule to follow. Like I said, using documentation and the like is fine (also the papers written by the authors of the software are considered third party if they've been printed in a peer reviewed journal), but we don't want the majority of the article to rely on them. Protonk (talk) 23:01, 24 September 2014 (UTC)

@Protonk: Thanks for your response and your patience in explaining the wiki viewpoint. I agree with you and will try to improve/expand the article to include more references in my spare time. In this case, I thought incorrectly that "third-party sources" meant sources that do not include those involved in the software. It seems that a few of the pages for other optimization software packages would need improving/expanding as well based on this conversation. Thanks again. Gnowzil (talk) 23:22, 24 September 2014 (UTC)

User talk:FGwolfman

• User talk:FGwolfman · ( logs | history | links | watch ) · [revisions]

Besides the high jacking, much of that information was useful, could I get a copy please [ Ray-Rays 17:46, 24 September 2014 (UTC) Contact ]

• The talk page is not deleted. Are you asking about the user page? Protonk (talk) 17:48, 24 September 2014 (UTC)
• They're referring to the user page, which I deleted. And won't ever restore: Freedom Gamers is a Steam Community Group created on the 3rd of June, 2010, by the infamous Max Norton, known as by his community of 12 year old children as Wolfman. The initial Freedom Gamers Garry's Mod server consisted solely of the prepubescent-filled game-mode known as Jailbreak And it gets worse after that. So much so that I can't even paste it here. §FreeRangeFrog^croak 18:25, 24 September 2014 (UTC)
• Yeah, wanted to say thank you for deleting that, I just need a copy of the base information. I don't see why your gotta be a fool about this matter. As they say, give a small man power, and watch him abuse it. That describes you Frog. I also like to point out you ignored 2-0 against deleting the page vote in chat, and counting me and you that makes 3-1, but that doesn't matter to you because you abuse your power.[ Ray-Rays 23:27, 24 September 2014 (UTC) Contact ]

  If you need a copy, get it from FGWolfman, who originally created the page. Wikipedia is not a web host for such stuff, and using Wikipedia for that purpose runs the risk of losing the content. It doesn't matter who 'voted', the fact is that the page violated Wikipedia content policies and had to go. FreeRangeFrog was entirely correct in deleting it, and it should have been done sooner. ~Amatulić (talk) 23:36, 24 September 2014 (UTC)

• Not done Editor was blocked for legal threats, content unlikely to be restored otherwise. Protonk (talk) 00:18, 25 September 2014 (UTC)

Raymart San Jose

• Raymart San Jose · ( talk | logs | links | watch ) · [revisions]

Enter your reasoning here and then click the "Save page" button below -Raymartsanjose (talk) 01:14, 25 September 2014 (UTC) It's under reviewing and editing.

 Not done. Articles deleted in accordance with WP:CSD#A7 are not eligible for restoration by request on this page. Contact the deleting administrator TParis, and if you are not satisfied with the response (TParis may be willing to restore it to your user space), then take your case to Wikipedia:Deletion review.

Bear in mind also that you should not write an article about yourself. The article is unlikely to be restored. ~Amatulić (talk) 03:08, 25 September 2014 (UTC)

Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Cassette-Translifter System

• Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Cassette-Translifter System · ( logs | links | watch ) · [revisions]

I, 212.246.100.211, request the undeletion of this Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page as I intend to work on it. 212.246.100.211 (talk) 08:09, 25 September 2014 (UTC)

This was previously requested to be restored on September 1, 2014, and was restored the same day. In other words, the draft is not now and was not deleted when you made your request above.--Fuhghettaboutit (talk) 12:20, 25 September 2014 (UTC)

Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Inde Motorsports Ranch

• Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Inde Motorsports Ranch · ( logs | links | watch ) · [revisions]

I, Gavron, request the undeletion of this Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page as I intend to work on it. Gavron (talk) 02:16, 25 September 2014 (UTC)

Not done. @Gavron: The page constituted blatant copyright infringement of the content at this site and thus cannot be restored. Please be aware in your future edits that you may not copy and paste copyrighted content. Thanks.--Fuhghettaboutit (talk) 12:31, 25 September 2014 (UTC)

Leticia Remauro

• Leticia Remauro · ( talk | logs | history | links | watch ) · [revisions]

Leticia Remauro is the current Chairman of Community Board 1 in Staten Island, a New York City Government Agency consisting of 50 volunteer members appointed by the Borough President and the New York City Council. Community Board 1 encompasses the North Shore of Staten Island where the New York Wheel and Empire Outlets will soon be located. As Chairman of Community Board 1, Ms. Remauro oversees the board as they vote on historic land use items and advise on matters related to the New York City budget. Prior to her election as Chairman, Ms. Remauro served as Vice President for Community Relations of the Battery Park City Authority, a New York State Public Benefit Corporation tasked with developing 92 acres of land created using fill from the World Trade Center site which was located directly across the street in Lower Manhattan. Battery Park City was home to the first sustainable residential highrise building known as the Solaire. Prior to joining Battery Park City, Ms Remauro was liasion to New York State Governor George E. Pataki in which capacity she assisted with the closure of the Fresh Kills Landfill. Ms. Remauro also served as Chairman of the Richmond County Republican Committee during which time she guided the party to many victories including delivering the votes that elected Michael Bloomberg as Mayor of New York City. Ms. Remauro appears regularly on NY1 News as a political consultant. Ms. Remauro is a notable figure in politics and government in New York City and State and therefore her page should be reinstated. -98.113.190.53 (talk) 05:47, 25 September 2014 (UTC)

• Done - as a contested proposed deletion, the article has been restored on request. Graeme Bartlett (talk) 12:46, 25 September 2014 (UTC)

User:Deaner84/sandbox

• User:Deaner84/sandbox · ( talk | logs | links | watch ) · [revisions]

I, Deaner84, request the undeletion of this Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page as I intend to work on it. Deaner84 (talk) 15:45, 25 September 2014 (UTC)

Deaner84 (talk) 15:45, 25 September 2014 (UTC)Deaner84

@Deaner84: - your sandbox page has been restored. ~Amatulić (talk) 16:31, 25 September 2014 (UTC)

The Night Runners

The Night Runners · ( talk | logs | links | watch | afd ) · [revisions]

The Night Runners page was placed in "Speedy Deletion" for no reason. Please reinstate this submission. The article was re-written, updated with new credible sources (MTV, All Music, IMDB, & more) honoring Wikipedia Guidelines. The band are public figures and i have clearly demonstrated that with multiple sources. I kindly request for that article submission to be "undeleted" and reapplied for Wikipedia induction. Thank you. --Takemenow24 (talk) 01:36, 24 September 2014 (UTC)

 Not done @Takemenow24, Callanecc, C.Fred: Hello. I take it you are the same person who has the accounts Mason8252, Iampixiedust, etc., and who created multiple other accounts to !vote in the articles for deletion discussion that were confirmed as sockpuppets. Anyway, no, there was no recreated page with new and better referencing. The article at the time it was deleted on September 4, 2014, and the time you recreated it on September 23, was word-for-word identical except for the addition of one citation to this Allmusic page (all other cites, includes iMDb and MTV were the same), and that Allmusic page provides no new basis to notability (it is not substantive treatment of the topic at all). The page was thus speedy deleted (under CSD G4) as a substantial recreation of the topic that had already been considered on the merits at articles for deletion. This band can have an article here once they achieve sufficient notoriety to be the subject of substantial write-up in reliable, secondary sources. That just has not happened yet. If it does, we will welcome a neutrally written article. Until then, please find something else to do. There is no shortage of currently notable topics that don't have articles.--Fuhghettaboutit (talk) 12:30, 24 September 2014 (UTC)

I am a new user and your accusation of me being a "sock puppet" is false. The All Music page is a legit source referring from Rovi Corporation which is an affiliate of Billboard. In that source it clearly shows that the band are public figures/recording artists and have released their song "Single". This page is not "recreated word-for-word", if so please provide evidence of such a false accusation. For the record, please refrain from disrespectful threats such as "please find something else to do". --Takemenow24 (talk) 20:25, 24 September 2014 (UTC)

@Takemenow24: I just looked at the deleted versions ([1] and [2], visible only to admins), and they are practically identical. They also both mention the release of "Single", so its release (and the pending release of an EP in 2015) was known at the time of the AfD. Thus, the community decided that wasn't enough to establish notability then. They'll need to do something additional and/or get substantial coverage in reliable sources for an article to be created. —C.Fred (talk) 20:37, 24 September 2014 (UTC)

It's interesting that someone who denies being a sockpuppet account of the original (blocked) accounts involved in this article would re-create it verbatim. Takemenow24, you provided evidence yourself. ~Amatulić (talk) 21:11, 24 September 2014 (UTC)

We have this thing called the duck test which seems to apply here--you're using here multiple points of the same language phrases as some of the accounts (all shown to be the same) used, such as "public figures", "credible sources", "kindly", after posting content of a deleted article (showing you are not some random new person but had access to the content before it was deleted). But, it really doesn't matter if you are the same person. It doesn't change the issue of whether we should have this content or whether its reposting met CSD G4. Please understand that being "public figures" is not an inclusion standard, and you have already been advised what would be needed for an article that would meet our core inclusion standards.--Fuhghettaboutit (talk) 22:35, 24 September 2014 (UTC)

Takemenow24 indef blocked, confirmed as a sock of Mason8252 along with several others: Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Mason8252. ~Amatulić (talk) 17:50, 25 September 2014 (UTC)

Kinnek

• Kinnek · ( talk | logs | links | watch | afd ) · [revisions]

I believe that my article about Kinnek satisfies the notability requirement. The company is a high-profile startup in the B2B marketplace industry that has completed its Series A funding round and has received a great deal of press. There are numerous major news sites reporting on Kinnek, its product, and its future, including but not limited to: VentureBeat, Pando Daily, and TechCrunch. The links: http://venturebeat.com/2014/09/15/kinnek-grabs-a-new-10m-to-help-small-businesses-shop-for-supplies/, http://pando.com/2014/09/15/kinnek-raises-10m-from-matrix-to-help-smbs-handle-procurement-like-the-big-boys/, and http://techcrunch.com/2014/09/15/kinnek-10m/ -Tskeeve9 (talk) 22:09, 25 September 2014 (UTC)

Not done - this page was deleted in accordance with criterion for speedy deletion A7. If you believe that this decision was made in error, or that significant new information has come to light since the deletion, please contact the administrator who carried out the deletion, user GB fan (talk · contribs). If you have already done so, your concerns can be taken to deletion review. ~Amatulić (talk) 22:33, 25 September 2014 (UTC)

User:Veetrag/enparadigm

• User:Veetrag/enparadigm · ( talk | logs | links | watch ) · [revisions]

I, Veetrag, request the undeletion of this Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page as I intend to work on it. Veetrag 03:53, 26 September 2014 (UTC)

• Done - as an Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13, the page has been restored on request. Please edit the page to address the issues raised when it was declined, and re-submit it; "Articles for creation" is not for the indefinite hosting of material found to be unsuitable for inclusion in the encyclopedia. Graeme Bartlett (talk) 05:44, 26 September 2014 (UTC)

Todd_Cochrane

• Todd_Cochrane · ( talk | logs | links | watch | afd ) · [revisions]

This individual has been one of the key individuals responsible for growth in the podcasting space, and is notable in that way as well in being a online celebrity" button below -70.0.250.158 (talk) 01:45, 26 September 2014 (UTC)

• Done - as a contested proposed deletion, the article has been restored on request. Graeme Bartlett (talk) 06:03, 26 September 2014 (UTC)

https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia_talk:Articles_for_creation/Round_Midnight_Creative_Arts&action=edit&redlink=1

• [[:]] · ( [[|talk]] | logs | links | watch | afd | mfd ) · [revisions]

(This user used the preload form for AFC undeletion, but did not specify the name of the AFC draft they would like undeleted. Consider checking their deleted contributions.) Clairenstu (talk) 06:01, 26 September 2014 (UTC)

• Done - as an Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13, the page has been restored on request. Please note that you never submitted the entry for review. When you are ready, you need to click the green notice in the template at the top of the page that says "Submit your draft when you are ready for it to be reviewed!" Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Round Midnight Creative Arts Graeme Bartlett (talk) 06:06, 26 September 2014 (UTC)

COVERINGSETC

• COVERINGSETC · ( talk | logs | links | watch ) · [revisions]

I would like to put my article in Draft mode so I can continue editing it and adding in the signifigant refrerences and citations. -Minnianda (talk) 13:37, 26 September 2014 (UTC)

 Not done. Too much of the content was copied from other web sites. There is no benefit to Wikipedia in restoring copyrighted content. ~Amatulić (talk) 14:29, 26 September 2014 (UTC)

Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/SyndicateRoom

Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/SyndicateRoom · ( logs | links | watch ) · [revisions] Protonk (talk) 15:09, 26 September 2014 (UTC) <- inserted for an IP editor.

Done - as an Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13, the page has been restored on request. Please edit the page to address the issues raised when it was declined, and re-submit it; "Articles for creation" is not for the indefinite hosting of material found to be unsuitable for inclusion in the encyclopedia. §FreeRangeFrog^croak 20:36, 26 September 2014 (UTC)

Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/The Dyad System

• Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/The Dyad System · ( logs | links | watch ) · [revisions]

I, Alnstern, request the undeletion of this Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page as I intend to work on it. Alnstern (talk) 18:34, 26 September 2014 (UTC)

• I restored this before, and you did nothing to improve the page. What do you propose to do? Graeme Bartlett (talk) 21:24, 26 September 2014 (UTC)

Digital Fluid Power

• Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Digital Fluid Power · ( logs | links | watch ) · [revisions]

(This user used the preload form for AFC undeletion, but did not specify the name of the AFC draft they would like undeleted. Consider checking their deleted contributions.) Digitalfluidpower (talk) 19:40, 26 September 2014 (UTC)

Note: Fixed report to point to correct title; remember that all page titles on Wikipedia are case-sensitive. That said, what would you personally do in order to make sure the article got accepted? We do not undelete G13s more than once. —Jeremy v^_^v ^Bori! 21:18, 26 September 2014 (UTC)

• Done - as an Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13, the page has been restored on request. Please note that you never submitted the entry for review. When you are ready, you need to click the green notice in the template at the top of the page that says "Submit your draft when you are ready for it to be reviewed!" Graeme Bartlett (talk) 21:27, 26 September 2014 (UTC)

User:Dr Lisa Marie Portugal

• User:Dr Lisa Marie Portugal · ( talk | logs | links | watch ) · [revisions]

Enter your reasoning here and then click the "Save page" button below -72.208.10.96 (talk) 02:03, 27 September 2014 (UTC)

Not done The userpage has been deleted (again) because userpages are not supposed to be used that way. If you wish to create an article about yourself, please follow the instructions here. §FreeRangeFrog^croak 02:27, 27 September 2014 (UTC)

Vladimir Rizov

• Vladimir Rizov · ( talk | logs | links | watch ) · [revisions]

This person is deleted my page because its A7 for speedy deletion. Please, restore this page. -Vladimirrizov2 (talk) 06:27, 27 September 2014 (UTC)

• Not done - this article has not been restored because it does not appear to meet our guidelines for inclusion of articles about people. In general, Wikipedia considers a topic to be notable if there exist multiple reliable sources of information on the topic, external to the subject itself. Articles concerning people will be deleted on sight if they are considered to be unambiguous advertising or promotion, or if they do not contain a credible assertion of the significance of the subject. the panda ₯’ 10:03, 27 September 2014 (UTC)

Fresco (windowing system)

• Fresco (windowing system) · ( talk | logs | links | watch | afd ) · [revisions]

Fresco was deleted by User:GiantSnowman as an expired product. The page says "deleted page Fresco (windowing system) (Expired PROD, concern was: No notability, no references, no activity, no impact)". The Fresco window system is important historically, even if it's an "expired product". It was the first attempt at a general OpenGL-based window system, and in many ways an inspiration for Wayland. Please revert the deletion. -Resuna (talk) 02:36, 27 September 2014 (UTC)

• Done Done. Proposed deletions can be reversed on request. If possible, please add sources for the bits about Fresco's novelty and connection to Wayland. Protonk (talk) 02:46, 27 September 2014 (UTC)
• Yep, I have a policy of pretty much restoring all PRODS upon request - @Resuna: you should have just approached me directly. GiantSnowman 06:29, 27 September 2014 (UTC)
  • If that's your preference that's fine, but PRODs are pretty easy for us to handle at REFUND so it's perfectly ok to bring them here. Protonk (talk) 12:24, 27 September 2014 (UTC)

Eddy Francois

• Eddy Francois · ( talk | logs | history | links | watch ) · [revisions]

Is the subject of this article the same subject of Aidi (footballer, born 1990)? If so, can revisions be undeleted? I've created the same page as a redirect. -George Ho (talk) 18:09, 27 September 2014 (UTC)

• There's very, very little there. Basically an infobox and one sentence sourced to this site. If you want I can restore it, but it's probably not worth the effort Protonk (talk) 18:20, 27 September 2014 (UTC)

Ruan_Life_Sciences

• Ruan_Life_Sciences · ( talk | logs | links | watch | afd ) · [revisions]

please, let me know what documents you want me to submit, or how I can make notable the page. then click the "Save page" button below -Animesh1975 (talk) 18:33, 27 September 2014 (UTC)

 Comment: It hasn't been deleted yet, but mere existence is not sufficient. You cannot make the "page" notable - the company has to be notable to begin with, and that one is not the panda ₯’ 18:39, 27 September 2014 (UTC)

EZ AD TV

• EZ AD TV · ( talk | logs | links | watch ) · [revisions]

This article was deleted as a copyright violation, but I've received permission through OTRS (verify) to use the text under the standard dual license (CC-BY-SA 3.0 and GFDL unversioned). Even so, the text of the website is probably too promotional anyway, so I'm not sure if adminstrators will entertain this request or userfy the content. -Anon126 (notify me of responses! / talk / contribs) 19:29, 27 September 2014 (UTC)

• Not done - this article has not been restored because it does not appear to meet our guidelines for inclusion of articles about companies. In general, Wikipedia considers a topic to be notable if there exist multiple reliable sources of information on the topic, external to the subject itself. Articles concerning companies will be deleted on sight if they are considered to be unambiguous advertising or promotion, or if they do not contain a credible assertion of the significance of the subject. The style is promotional, but it could be edited, however there is no claim of importance either. Graeme Bartlett (talk) 20:56, 27 September 2014 (UTC)

Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Sheikh ABDUL ROUF DALAL

• Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Sheikh ABDUL ROUF DALAL · ( logs | links | watch ) · [revisions]

I, 14.98.241.82, request the undeletion of this Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page as I intend to work on it. 14.98.241.82 (talk) 08:10, 27 September 2014 (UTC)

• Done - as an Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13, the page has been restored on request. Please edit the page to address the issues raised when it was declined, and re-submit it; "Articles for creation" is not for the indefinite hosting of material found to be unsuitable for inclusion in the encyclopedia. Graeme Bartlett (talk) 20:59, 27 September 2014 (UTC)

Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Shubi Husain

• Shubi Husain · ( talk | logs | links | watch ) · [revisions]

Much more information including awards won and recognitions acknowledged by the public and media is available and needs to be added for a genuine consideration for inclusion -Ubsingh (talk) 17:18, 27 September 2014 (UTC)

• Done - as an Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13, the page has been restored on request. Please edit the page to address the issues raised when it was declined, and re-submit it; "Articles for creation" is not for the indefinite hosting of material found to be unsuitable for inclusion in the encyclopedia. Actually there needs to be less puffery such as awards and recognition, but independent sources are welcome. see Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Shubi Husain Graeme Bartlett (talk) 21:03, 27 September 2014 (UTC)

User:Bb-miler/sandbox

• User:Bb-miler/sandbox · ( talk | logs | history | links | watch ) · [revisions]

I, Bb-miler, request the undeletion of this Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page as I intend to work on it. Bb-miler (talk) 00:17, 27 September 2014 (UTC)

• Done G13 delete was out of process. Graeme Bartlett (talk) 21:38, 27 September 2014 (UTC)

Bollywood Khazana

• Bollywood khazana · ( talk | logs | links | watch ) · [revisions]

As its a famous magzine of Bollywood INDIA so how can you delete it as its also ranks good in India and popular also and then click the "Save page" button below -Btownkhazana (talk) 16:27, 28 September 2014 (UTC)

Not done There is no indication that this magazine meets Wikipedia's standards of notability. The article was promotional and cited no reliable sources. I have protected the article against creation since we had to delete it no less than four times in the last few days. Huon (talk) 17:00, 28 September 2014 (UTC)

did you get both Bollywood khazana and Bollywood Khazana?-- TRPoD aka The Red Pen of Doom 17:32, 28 September 2014 (UTC)

Both are create protected... and Btownkhazana is indef blocked. ~Amatulić (talk) 18:06, 28 September 2014 (UTC)

Pinoyexchange

• Pinoyexchange · ( talk | logs | links | watch ) · [revisions]

Redirect page is existing and valid and then click the "Save page" button below -Maracerella (talk) 07:44, 29 September 2014 (UTC)

 Not done. The redirect target PinoyExchange does not exist. It was deleted as the outcome of Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/PinoyExchange (2nd nomination). ~Amatulić (talk) 16:55, 29 September 2014 (UTC)

David Bourgeois

• David Bourgeois · ( talk | logs | history | links | watch ) · [revisions]

I'm a working film writer who's been published in hundreds of publications. No one single user gets to determine what is and isn't relevant for Wikipedia. Especially people who aren't in the same discipline. -Obdurate (talk) 15:54, 29 September 2014 (UTC)

Not done - this page was deleted in accordance with criterion for speedy deletion A7. If you believe that this decision was made in error, or that significant new information has come to light since the deletion, please contact the administrator who carried out the deletion, user WilyD (talk · contribs). If you have already done so, your concerns can be taken to deletion review.

Also, no one single user made the decision to delete. Someone proposed it, and an administrator agreed. The fact is, that being published is not a factor for notability, as far as Wikipedia is concerned. Notability in Wikipedia's context is defined as having significant coverage by multiple, reliable sources that are independent of the subject. See Wikipedia:Golden rule for a general overview of what is expected. ~Amatulić (talk) 17:07, 29 September 2014 (UTC)

Nouman Hashmi

• Nouman Hashmi · ( talk | logs | links | watch | afd ) · [revisions]

Enter your reasoning here and then click the "Save page" button below -Remaindersend (talk) 16:27, 29 September 2014 (UTC)

 Not done because the article isn't deleted. This isn't the place to contest proposed deletions, either. Please go to Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Nouman Hashmi to participate in the discussion. ~Amatulić (talk) 17:09, 29 September 2014 (UTC)

Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Yahya Armajani

• Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Yahya Armajani · ( logs | history | links | watch ) · [revisions]

I, Penthrift, request the undeletion of this Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page as I intend to work on it. Penthrift (talk) 16:30, 29 September 2014 (UTC)

Done - as an Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13, the page has been restored on request. Please edit the page to address the issues raised when it was declined, and re-submit it; "Articles for creation" is not for the indefinite hosting of material found to be unsuitable for inclusion in the encyclopedia. ~Amatulić (talk) 17:10, 29 September 2014 (UTC)

Years & Years

• Years & Years · ( talk | logs | history | links | watch ) · [revisions]

Enter your reasoning here and then click the "Save page" button below -Jamellis (talk) 09:33, 29 September 2014 (UTC) Please undelete so that I can remove the copyright infringing sentences and resubmit for approval. I'd like to get this up as soon as possible and would appreciate any help! Thanks

 Not done, nothing to do. The page already exists as a redirect to Olly Alexander, which has never been deleted either. The redirect page Years & Years has never been deleted and has no deleted contribution history. ~Amatulić (talk) 16:58, 29 September 2014 (UTC)

 Comment: This is about Draft:Years & Years, and every single sentence was copy-pasted. That's unsalvageable. Huon (talk) 17:43, 29 September 2014 (UTC)

Ah. Thanks for clarifying. ~Amatulić (talk) 18:18, 29 September 2014 (UTC)

Enviorment

• Enviorment · ( talk | logs | links | watch ) · [revisions]

This could be a piece of information about earth's enviorment and how much greenhouse gases we are causing. -Wikipedian 2 (talk) 08:19, 30 September 2014 (UTC)

• Not done This is actually a misspelling of the word environment. We already have a fairly substantial article on the topic at Environment (biophysical) and you're welcome to help contribute to that article. I do want to caution you about using Wikipedia as a WP:SOAPBOX for environmental causes, as we need to make sure that we're neutral about this sort of thing- regardless of how good and just we think that the cause is. I'm not overly worried about this, but I feel that I have to say it since you did say something about writing about the amount of greenhouse gases that are being created. Tokyogirl79 (｡◕‿◕｡) 09:29, 30 September 2014 (UTC)

europlus sialkot pvt ltd

• Europlus sialkot pvt ltd · ( talk | logs | links | watch ) · [revisions]

Enter your reasoning here and then click the "Save page" button below -Qaseen (talk) 07:11, 30 September 2014 (UTC) sir i work in this company my boss said me to make the wikipedia page for our comapny so i create the page in wikipedia but why u are deleting this page sir please if ther is any problem with page please correct it but donot delete it

• The problem is that the page was fairly promotional in tone and the entire initial paragraph would have to be re-written in order to fit our neutrality guidelines. I'd say that a better way to phrase it would be "Euro Plus Sialkot (PVT) LTD is a manufacturer and exporter of military and sports equipment and clothing." That sums up everything in a nutshell and removes all of the promotional ad-speak, which again, isn't allowed on Wikipedia. You can elaborate somewhat from there, but avoid any WP:PEACOCK terms like "leading" and phrases like "would like to develop its presence on the world wide web to cater the business & business requirement of today's e-media world.Euro Plus, being a manufacturer and exporter wants to deliver quality products on global basis through skilled manpower, Best service & competitive prices." That's pretty much the biggest reason why the page was deleted as WP:G11. However that said, there are also some issues with coverage in reliable sources (WP:RS). Even if it is restored or re-created, you will need to show where the company has received coverage in independent and reliable sources like newspapers and the like. I do note that your company is not located in the United States and because of that, coverage may not necessarily be in English. As long as the coverage is in a place that would pass muster at WP:RS/N, it can be used to help show notability regardless of what language it is written in. Tokyogirl79 (｡◕‿◕｡) 09:35, 30 September 2014 (UTC)

Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Emma Handy

• Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Emma Handy · ( logs | history | links | watch ) · [revisions]

RokafellaB (talk) 22:45, 29 September 2014 (UTC)

• Done - as an Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13, the page has been restored on request. Please edit the page to address the issues raised when it was declined, and re-submit it; "Articles for creation" is not for the indefinite hosting of material found to be unsuitable for inclusion in the encyclopedia. Tokyogirl79 (｡◕‿◕｡) 09:40, 30 September 2014 (UTC)

• @RokafellaB: On a side note, you should refer to the article subject by her last name within the article as per editing/writing standards. Tokyogirl79 (｡◕‿◕｡) 09:40, 30 September 2014 (UTC)

Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Max Highstein

• Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Max Highstein · ( logs | links | watch ) · [revisions]

I, Racquelpalmese, request the undeletion of this Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page as I intend to work on it. Racquelpalmese (talk) 23:20, 29 September 2014 (UTC)

• Done - as an Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13, the page has been restored on request. Please edit the page to address the issues raised when it was declined, and re-submit it; "Articles for creation" is not for the indefinite hosting of material found to be unsuitable for inclusion in the encyclopedia. Tokyogirl79 (｡◕‿◕｡) 09:45, 30 September 2014 (UTC)

• @Racquelpalmese: I'm doing some minor editing to the page- the biggie I want to mention is that rather than listing the publishers as sources, you should be linking to stuff like the AllMusic reviews and newspaper articles. I'll see what I can do to help this along. Tokyogirl79 (｡◕‿◕｡) 09:45, 30 September 2014 (UTC)

Galina Vale

• Galina Vale · ( talk | logs | links | watch ) · [revisions]

Enter your reasoning here and then click the "Save page" button below -Novaguitarra (talk) 19:22, 28 September 2014 (UTC) Page for musical artist Galina Vale was created 5 years ago, and all these time nobody tried to delete it. Why suddenly someone decided to delete it that is the question.

According to the logs, it was deleted because it was deemed to be 'Unambiguous advertising or promotion' Stuartyeates (talk) 19:52, 28 September 2014 (UTC)

The article was quite short and was only giving some facts of biography and achievements of the artist. It was here for 5 years, "no" major changes was made to it.

If someone could just improve it it would be much more helpful rather then just speedy delete it .

I request to review deletion please. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Novaguitarra (talk • contribs) 20:07, 28 September 2014 (UTC)

Then the first thing you must do is contact the blocking administrator Jimfbleak. If Jimflbleak won't restore, it, then you can make your case at Wikipedia:Deletion review.

However, I'd say don't waste your time. The most recent deletion was due not just to promotion, but because the article contained copyright infringing material. Copyright infringements are deleted on sight, regardless of the duration on Wikipedia, and cannot be restored. Your best bet is to have the deleting administrator email you a copy, which you should not repost. ~Amatulić (talk) 16:52, 29 September 2014 (UTC)

Thank you for looking at this issue. Yes, I have contacted jim, but has no answer. I think that the page was deleted because someone wanted to attack it, same time as the page was destroyed, also artist youtube channel was attacked. There was no copyright infringement on this page, page was standing here for 5 years, surely was checked by moderators many times over the years. No major changes was made, except it was only shortened. How to appeal against attack here in wikipedia? — Preceding unsigned comment added by Novaguitarra (talk • contribs) 19:18, 29 September 2014 (UTC)

Calling deletion an attack is pure rubbish. We have 30million+ pages and <700 active admins. We don't have time to patrol every article. Literally, nobody knows who Galina Vale is, so how could it be an "attack"? the panda ɛˢˡ” 10:49, 30 September 2014 (UTC)

Air Pegasus

• Air Pegasus · ( talk | logs | history | links | watch ) · [revisions]

It was deleted via CSD-A7 before i could respond to the tag. -Trinidade (talk) 06:30, 30 September 2014 (UTC)

• I'm a little concerned that the article is for a company that has yet to actually start operating. However, if @FreeRangeFrog: is OK with it, I have no problem transferring it to your userspace. The problem here is that if this company never gets off the ground (drum riff) and never opens, then all we have are a handful of news stories about a company that never launched (sorry with the puns, can't help it) and that wouldn't really be enough to pass WP:CORP. It's just a little WP:TOOSOON for a mainspace entry. Tokyogirl79 (｡◕‿◕｡) 09:38, 30 September 2014 (UTC)

@Tokyogirl79: I understand your concerns that the company might never take-off. ;) I've already written @FreeRangeFrog: asking to transfer it draftspace for now. Trinidade (talk) 10:26, 30 September 2014 (UTC)

@Trinidade: Done Userified to User:Trinidade/Air Pegasus. Keep in mind that as Tokyogirl says, the company must meet WP:CORP to exist in article space. §FreeRangeFrog^croak 16:57, 30 September 2014 (UTC)

Windows 10

• Windows 10 · ( talk | logs | history | links | watch | afd | afd2 ) · [revisions]

Windows 10 was just announced to be the next version of Microsoft Windows -Parkerreno (talk) 17:15, 30 September 2014 (UTC)

Yes. So? It isn't being deleted. ~Amatulić (talk) 17:48, 30 September 2014 (UTC)

Mercedes Barcella

• Mercedes Barcella · ( talk | logs | links | watch ) · [revisions]

I already fixed the problem they were having that it looked too commercial. Thanks for the heads up! --Gladys1555 (talk) 06:05, 1 October 2014 (UTC) -Gladys1555 (talk) 06:05, 1 October 2014 (UTC)

• Not done Gladys1555 The page hasn't been deleted yet and since this is a speedy deletion, the best place to argue against this would be on the article's talk page. There are some other issues with the page- it's also tagged with an WP:A7, meaning that there is a concern over Barcella's notability. You can address this by providing coverage in reliable sources such as links to news stories about her and so on. I notice that you have said that she has been on various shows, but we need to see proof of this to show what type of appearances these are and how in-depth they were. Was she only briefly shown in a 1 second flicker over her artwork? Was she shown in-depth? I also note that the article is still written in a fairly casual tone, as if it was a fan page or was taken from her personal website. I don't know that it's still overly promotional in the "buy her stuff now, she's awesome" way, but the overly casual tone can negatively impact a page and still come across as a little promotional. Not only that, but if this was taken from a press release or personal website, you need to be careful to avoid WP:COPYVIO. Tokyogirl79 (｡◕‿◕｡) 07:37, 1 October 2014 (UTC)

Windows 9

• Windows 9 · ( talk | logs | history | links | watch | afd | afd2 ) · [revisions]

The Windows 9 page was deleted because it was serving as a redirect that many thought confusing to many people. However, not only has there been a plethora of news articles and such concerning this topic, but Windows 9 is also set to be demoed tomorrow by Microsoft as a Technical preview. As such, this page could validly serve the Wikimedia community, not as a redirect, but as a full-fledged article detailing the deluge of information and news that will be coming over the next several weeks. Plus, it's bound to be confusing to type Windows 9 as an article search in to Wikipedia and not find it, considering that this has been kind of a hot topic on the Internet for several weeks now. -173.21.51.97 (talk) 15:35, 29 September 2014 (UTC)

 Not done. The redirect was deleted as a consequence of Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2014 May 11#Windows 9. We don't restore pages by request if they were deleted as a result of discussions.

However, feel free to write an article about Windows 9. The entire deleted contribution history of that page was never more than a few hundred bytes long, when it was a disambiguation page 2 years ago.

It's high time Wikipedia had a full-fledged article on this subject. Go for it. ~Amatulić (talk) 17:03, 29 September 2014 (UTC)

Great. Thanks for the info; I don't have time right now to create a new article from scratch, but maybe if I make a stub, people will see the topic is open again, and it can start anew. Also, since the article was recreated once and deleted again as it had been proposed for deletion, maybe there should be a note of some kind that says there is permission from an admin to start the article again? So it doesn't get nominated for speedy deletion? Thanks in advance. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 173.21.51.97 (talk) 17:27, 29 September 2014 (UTC)

You can always flesh out a draft article (just create Draft:Windows 9, or if you don't have an account, use Wikipedia:Articles for creation) and it won't be deleted. It's the main space articles that get closer scrutiny. ~Amatulić (talk) 23:50, 29 September 2014 (UTC)

And take a look at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2014 September 30#Windows 9 for a current discussion. Graeme Bartlett (talk) 09:52, 1 October 2014 (UTC)

jay sharda construction

• Jay Sharda Construction · ( talk | logs | links | watch ) · [revisions]

It's an private organization and what's wrong in that i haven't written anything out of the bound.it's an company which gives employment to the person who are unemployed.

if any thing is wrong in this post then tell me i will surely change that thing and if am violating your rule then you can delete it from your end.

i will be giving all the registered details of the company and if doesn't follows your policy then it's up to you.

i am sure it will be beneficial for others. one day this page will have to be created because it's worth it. -Vivekk983 (talk) 12:51, 1 October 2014 (UTC)

 Comment: It hasn't been deleted, yet ... but see our requirements for notability for businesses for info as to why it will the panda ɛˢˡ” 13:06, 1 October 2014 (UTC)

Beeline VMS

• Beeline VMS · ( talk | logs | links | watch ) · [revisions]

This is a current work in progress, we are adding information each day. Please do not delete the current page. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 98.231.65.172 (talk) 16:41, 1 October 2014 (UTC)

Too late. Who is "we"? Also, Wikipedia should not be used for publicity or promotion, ever. Talk to the deleting administrator if you want it restored. ~Amatulić (talk) 18:03, 2 October 2014 (UTC)

List of scouting troops and service units

• List of scouting troops and service units · ( talk | logs | links | watch | afd ) · [revisions]

Referred to here from wp:AN. Would an administrator please userify to me a copy of recently deleted article List of scouting troops and service units, including its edit history? I contacted the closer of Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/List of scouting troops and service units for this, but they are involved in a lot elsewhere i think and i am not sure they are an administrator or not anyhow. Could someone else simply provide it? I may choose to develop it more or may choose to ask for deletion review. TIA, --doncram 21:34, 2 October 2014 (UTC) -doncram 21:34, 2 October 2014 (UTC)

 Done. @Doncram: I restored the article and its talk page to User:Doncram/List of scouting troops and service units. ~Amatulić (talk) 21:56, 2 October 2014 (UTC)

Timothy Eldred

• Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Timothy Eldred · ( logs | links | watch ) · [revisions]

Timothyeldred (talk) 13:30, 2 October 2014 (UTC)

 Not done, because it was empty, with no content to restore except for invisible comments. Feel free to re-create it from scratch. ~Amatulić (talk) 22:02, 2 October 2014 (UTC)

Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Danny Walters

• Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Danny Walters · ( logs | links | watch ) · [revisions]

I, LukeOcana, request the undeletion of this Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page as I intend to work on it. LukeOcana (talk) 23:30, 1 October 2014 (UTC)

Done - as an Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13, the page has been restored on request. Please edit the page to address the issues raised when it was declined, and re-submit it; "Articles for creation" is not for the indefinite hosting of material found to be unsuitable for inclusion in the encyclopedia. ~Amatulić (talk) 22:09, 2 October 2014 (UTC)

Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/U.S. Kids Golf

• Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/U.S. Kids Golf · ( logs | links | watch ) · [revisions]

I, 69.199.15.66, request the undeletion of this Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page as I intend to work on it. 69.199.15.66 (talk) 17:50, 2 October 2014 (UTC)

Done - as an Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13, the page has been restored on request. Please edit the page to address the issues raised when it was declined, and re-submit it; "Articles for creation" is not for the indefinite hosting of material found to be unsuitable for inclusion in the encyclopedia. ~Amatulić (talk) 22:12, 2 October 2014 (UTC)

Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/SearchSpring

• Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/SearchSpring · ( logs | links | watch ) · [revisions]

I, SearchSpring, request the undeletion of this Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page as I intend to work on it. SearchSpring (talk) 19:41, 2 October 2014 (UTC)

 Not done. Show us you're serious about being a valued contributor by complying with Wikipedia:Username policy for one thing, and change your username at WP:CHU/Simple. Then we can entertain requests to restore a draft article that has been previously tagged as spam and declined at WP:AFC. ~Amatulić (talk) 22:16, 2 October 2014 (UTC)

Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Pinnacle Actuarial Resources, Inc.

• Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Pinnacle Actuarial Resources, Inc. · ( logs | links | watch ) · [revisions]

I, Mjones1015, request the undeletion of this Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page as I intend to work on it. Mjones1015 (talk) 20:27, 30 September 2014 (UTC)

@Mjones1015: Done - as an Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13, the page has been restored on request. Please edit the page to address the issues raised when it was declined, and re-submit it; "Articles for creation" is not for the indefinite hosting of material found to be unsuitable for inclusion in the encyclopedia. ~Amatulić (talk) 22:33, 2 October 2014 (UTC)

NTH Ring

• NTH Ring · ( talk | logs | history | links | watch ) · [revisions]

Deleted because of "Not of any relevance.". Strongly object to that reason. Here is a description from Civil engineer "A Scandinavian "civilingenjör" will in international contexts commonly call herself "Master of Science in Engineering" and will occasionally wear an engineering class ring. At the Norwegian Institute of Technology (now the Norwegian University of Science and Technology), the tradition with an NTH Ring goes back to 1914, before the Canadian iron ring." -Nsaa (talk) 19:25, 2 October 2014 (UTC)

@Nsaa: Done - as a contested proposed deletion, the article has been restored on request. ~Amatulić (talk) 22:00, 2 October 2014 (UTC)

Thanks! Kind regards, Nsaa (talk) 08:53, 3 October 2014 (UTC)

Fragger

• Fragger · ( talk | logs | history | links | watch ) · [revisions]

Fragger is a notable iOS game. See the Metacritic page which links to numerous critic reviews here. -Coin945 (talk) 11:53, 1 October 2014 (UTC)

 Not done because we don't restore articles deleted in accordance with WP:CSD#A7 by request on this page. @Coin945: If the game is notable (and I agree the Metacritic reviews constitute a decent argument for notability) then you have a good case to present to the deleting administrator RHaworth. The deleting admin should always be your first step. If he declines your request to restore, your next step is to take your case to Wikipedia:Deletion review. ~Amatulić (talk) 22:30, 2 October 2014 (UTC)

@Amatulic: Thankyou very much for your assistance. :)--Coin945 (talk) 15:27, 3 October 2014 (UTC)

Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Pit Trading 101 (film)

• Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Pit Trading 101 (film) · ( logs | links | watch ) · [revisions]

I, Kcweiss713, request the undeletion of this Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page as I intend to work on it. Kcweiss713 (talk) 00:20, 3 October 2014 (UTC)

Please reinstate my page. I did not receive the emails requesting the edits.

Regards, Kathryn Weiss

Done - as an Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13, the page has been restored on request. Please edit the page to address the issues raised when it was declined, and re-submit it; "Articles for creation" is not for the indefinite hosting of material found to be unsuitable for inclusion in the encyclopedia. ~Amatulić (talk) 17:22, 3 October 2014 (UTC)

Also, @Kcweiss713: Don't expect to receive any emails regarding needed edits. It is your responsibility to monitor the article and improve upon it, if you want your submission to be accepted eventually. If you abandon it again, it is highly unlikely to be restored from a second request. ~Amatulić (talk) 17:23, 3 October 2014 (UTC)

Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Jenny Hope

• Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Jenny Hope · ( logs | links | watch ) · [revisions]

I was never email that I needed to edit the page and then click the "Save page" button below -Eatthelions (talk) 03:09, 3 October 2014 (UTC)

Done - as an Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13, the page has been restored on request. Please edit the page to address the issues raised when it was declined, and re-submit it; "Articles for creation" is not for the indefinite hosting of material found to be unsuitable for inclusion in the encyclopedia.

Also, @Eatthelions: Don't expect to receive any emails regarding needed edits. It is your responsibility to monitor the article and improve upon it, if you want your submission to be accepted eventually. If you abandon it again, it is highly unlikely to be restored from a second request. ~Amatulić (talk) 17:31, 3 October 2014 (UTC)

File:Logo of University Athletic Association of the Philippines.svg

• File:Logo of University Athletic Association of the Philippines.svg · ( talk | logs | history | links | watch ) · [revisions]

This is a logo of a significant organisation. I did not notice until today that the file was orphaned and completely deleted. An editor of the University Athletic Association of the Philippines article might have probably removed the significant logo without any valid reason. -—  McVahl  Talk  07:31, 3 October 2014 (UTC)

 Done, image restored and added to the article infobox. ~Amatulić (talk) 17:41, 3 October 2014 (UTC)

Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Girls Not Brides: The Global Partnership to End Child Marriage

• Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Girls Not Brides: The Global Partnership to End Child Marriage · ( logs | links | watch ) · [revisions]

I, Awesomelisa, request the undeletion of this Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page as I intend to work on it. Awesomelisa (talk) 16:04, 3 October 2014 (UTC)

email that article was being deleted went into Spam folder, had assumed the article was still being reviewed -- evidence of my niaivity of the review process. I don't think I actually submit it, as I had previously thought. I would like to be able to resubmit -- happy for the article to be deleted if it doesn't conform to any guidelines, but I think it's a very interesting organisation and there are already broken links on other pages to this group, so it seems like it's currently missing from the website. -Awesomelisa (talk) 16:09, 3 October 2014 (UTC)

@Awesomelisa: Done - as an Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13, the page has been restored on request. Please edit the page to address the issues raised when it was declined, and re-submit it; "Articles for creation" is not for the indefinite hosting of material found to be unsuitable for inclusion in the encyclopedia. ~Amatulić (talk) 17:49, 3 October 2014 (UTC)