Wikipedia:Requests for undeletion/Archive 258
 | This is an archive of past discussions about Wikipedia:Requests for undeletion. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current main page. |
| Archive 255 | Archive 256 | Archive 257 | Archive 258 | Archive 259 | Archive 260 | → | Archive 265 |
Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Alice Bertha Morton
I, Mufc ed, request the undeletion of this Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page as I intend to work on it. Mufc ed (talk) 01:12, 16 January 2017 (UTC)
Done - as an Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13, the page has been restored on request. Please note that you never submitted the entry for review. When you are ready, you need to click the colored button in the template at the top of the page that says "Submit your draft for review!" Graeme Bartlett (talk) 10:09, 16 January 2017 (UTC)
Organizational Anatomy
(This user used the preload form for AFC undeletion, but did not specify the name of the AFC draft they would like undeleted. Consider checking their deleted contributions.) Olkonol (talk) 02:05, 16 January 2017 (UTC)
- Done - as an Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13, the page has been restored on request. Please edit the page to address any issues raised, and re-submit it; "Articles for creation" is not for the indefinite hosting of material found to be unsuitable for inclusion in the encyclopedia. Graeme Bartlett (talk) 10:15, 16 January 2017 (UTC)
Iru Mugan II
No reasoning given. -OMG YEA MERA INDIA (talk) 02:23, 16 January 2017 (UTC)
Not done I have deleted it again. If there are references for such a film, and filming has started, you can start a draft: Draft:Iru Mugan II. Graeme Bartlett (talk) 10:18, 16 January 2017 (UTC)
Draft:National Environmental Standards and Regulations Enforcement Agency (Nigeria)
- Draft:National Environmental Standards and Regulations Enforcement Agency (Nigeria) · ( talk | logs | history | links | watch ) · [revisions]
I, BroVic, request the undeletion of this Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page as I intend to work on it. BroVic (talk) 10:16, 16 January 2017 (UTC)
- Done - as an Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13, the page has been restored on request. Please edit the page to address any issues raised, and re-submit it; "Articles for creation" is not for the indefinite hosting of material found to be unsuitable for inclusion in the encyclopedia. Graeme Bartlett (talk) 10:20, 16 January 2017 (UTC)
Draft:Signac, LLC
(This user used the preload form for AFC undeletion, but did not specify the name of the AFC draft they would like undeleted. Consider checking their deleted contributions.) 2A02:C7D:BF1:F000:3C29:614C:9AC3:8D5A (talk) 10:17, 16 January 2017 (UTC)
- Done - as an Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13, the page has been restored on request. Please edit the page to address any issues raised, and re-submit it; "Articles for creation" is not for the indefinite hosting of material found to be unsuitable for inclusion in the encyclopedia. Graeme Bartlett (talk) 10:22, 16 January 2017 (UTC)
Draft:WaterSafe Installers Scheme
I, 86.149.239.33, request the undeletion of this Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page as I intend to work on it. 86.149.239.33 (talk) 11:14, 16 January 2017 (UTC)
- Done - as an Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13, the page has been restored on request. Please edit the page to address any issues raised, and re-submit it; "Articles for creation" is not for the indefinite hosting of material found to be unsuitable for inclusion in the encyclopedia. Graeme Bartlett (talk) 12:29, 16 January 2017 (UTC)
Draft:Birdy Hunt
I, Lookylellucky, request the undeletion of this Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page as I intend to work on it. Lookylellucky (talk) 15:25, 16 January 2017 (UTC)
- Done - as an Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13, the page has been restored on request. Please edit the page to address any issues raised, and re-submit it; "Articles for creation" is not for the indefinite hosting of material found to be unsuitable for inclusion in the encyclopedia. ~Anachronist (talk) 21:02, 16 January 2017 (UTC)
Nkvaid (talk) 16:30, 16 January 2017 (UTC) Hi,
Could you please undelete the below page, so that I can edit it and publish it according to wiki standards.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Queen_Mother_Dr._Delois_Blakely
Regards Nitin Vaid
- Not done This is a confusing situation doe to at least 3 moves. The final resting place of the page was Wikipedia talk:Queen Mother Dr. Delois Blakely, but it was a copyright infringement. You should start again with no copying, and no advertising at Draft:Delois Blakely. Graeme Bartlett (talk) 21:16, 16 January 2017 (UTC)
Hattarakihal Village
I, Shivappa Dundappa Hukkeri, request the undeletion of this Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page as I intend to work on it. Shivappa Dundappa Hukkeri (talk) 16:37, 16 January 2017 (UTC)
- @Shivappa Dundappa Hukkeri: this was already restored once before with no improvements made. What assurance can you give us that you will actually work on this page? There needs to be more sources given. Graeme Bartlett (talk) 21:19, 16 January 2017 (UTC)
Draft:Sustainability rating for transportation and other infrastructure
- Draft:Sustainability rating for transportation and other infrastructure · ( talk | logs | links | watch ) · [revisions]
I, Gmcvoy, request the undeletion of this Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page as I intend to work on it. Gmcvoy (talk) 16:37, 16 January 2017 (UTC)
- @Gmcvoy: this was already restored once before with no improvements made. What assurance can you give us that you will actually work on this page? There needs to be a clear lead written. Graeme Bartlett (talk) 21:22, 16 January 2017 (UTC)
Matthew Betley (Author)
Apparently, I made a mistake with content copyright which I will have all intention to fix. However I don't want to lose all the research and formatting I already put into the article. I would prefer restoration into my sandbox, so article can be fixed before it goes back into the regular area. Thank you Thadson (talk) 18:23, 16 January 2017 (UTC) -Thadson (talk) 18:23, 16 January 2017 (UTC)
- Done see User:Thadson/Matthew Betley (author). I have not put back text that is likely to be the infringement of others copyright. Rewrite content in your own words. Graeme Bartlett (talk) 21:28, 16 January 2017 (UTC)
Draft:Matthew Du Puy
I, Why mutate dup, request the undeletion of this Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page as I intend to work on it. Why mutate dup (talk) 18:38, 16 January 2017 (UTC)
new information has come to light about this article -Why mutate dup (talk) 18:40, 16 January 2017 (UTC)
- @Why mutate dup: This has been restored twice before and the last time you did nothing. What are you going to do to this draft? Graeme Bartlett (talk) 21:30, 16 January 2017 (UTC)
User:WikiOriginal-9/6
Subpage of mine -WikiOriginal-9 (talk) 18:55, 16 January 2017 (UTC)
- Done You may have to look back in the history to see what you want. Graeme Bartlett (talk) 21:33, 16 January 2017 (UTC)
Draft:Cam Perron
Enter your reasoning here and then click the "Save page" button below -Bobby Salerno 19:40, 16 January 2017 (UTC) I would be most appreciative if you would please reinstate/undelete the above referenced article as the inactivity was due to a personal family illness requiring my attention, and I am now in a position to complete the article for publication. Thank you in advance for your assistance in this matter.
Regards, Bob Salerno
- Done - as an Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13, the page has been restored on request. Please edit the page to address any issues raised, and re-submit it; "Articles for creation" is not for the indefinite hosting of material found to be unsuitable for inclusion in the encyclopedia. Wikipedia is not a platform to express your views, but instead is to inform us. Graeme Bartlett (talk) 21:37, 16 January 2017 (UTC)
draft:Bottle Rocket
The Bottle Rocket (Bottle Rocket Studios, previously Bottle Rocket Apps) page had been flagged for deletion in the summer of 2015 because it had not been updated for some time (I believe). Long story short, I failed to properly adhere to community guidelines when attempting to update the page and the situation snowballed. It was a misunderstanding on my part that there was no scenario in which it was acceptable for me to edit the page due to my conflict of interest. I will not say that I that I have a problem with how it was handled, but it seemed to get out of hand very quickly. After the situation escalated, my manager took over in an attempt to save the page. I'm not sure what happened from that point or if any further actions were taken, but the page no longer exists. I have reason to believe that Bottle Rocket should be on Wikipedia, not only because it was previously, but because it is a notable company in the app development space. I have already noted on my page that I have a conflict of interest as I am employed by the company in question. Also, I would have reached out to the user(s) who were involved, but it seems all are now semi-retired. Please let me know if I can provide any more information. -BricePatties (talk) 20:31, 16 January 2017 (UTC)
- Done I have restored the draft. The article will remain deleted because of Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Bottle Rocket Studios. The manager probably has a COI as well. But if the promotional tone is reduced and you can find substantial independent references, then it can be resubmitted. Graeme Bartlett (talk) 21:43, 16 January 2017 (UTC)
Sandeep Maheshwari
The page Sandeep Maheshwari previously deleted was made up by an amateur who doesn't know the basics of wikipedia. This page must be restored as Mr Sandeep Maheshwari is widely know throughout the globe and many notable articles is also available on the internet. Please do consider for undeletion. Thank you. -Golden Eye Clicks (talk) 19:02, 15 January 2017 (UTC)
- @Golden Eye Clicks: Not done and will not be done. We don't restore articles that are unambiguously promotional. You are welcome to start over from scratch at Draft:Sandeep Maheshwari and submit it for review via WP:AFC. ~Anachronist (talk) 19:53, 15 January 2017 (UTC)
@Anachronist: Okay. Yes I actually meant to restore to Draft:Sandeep Maheshwari so that I can work again from scratch. Because from what I can see the page Draft:Sandeep Maheshwari is also not available for Editing. Thank you.
- @Golden Eye Clicks: Please ask the admin who create-protected the draft, User:RHaworth, to remove that protection so that you may restart the draft from scratch. ~Anachronist (talk) 05:41, 16 January 2017 (UTC)
- @Anachronist: Okay Thank you so much ~Golden Eye Clicks (talk) 22:00, 16 January 2017 (UTC)
ILY from 38,000 FT
I request the undeletion of the "ILY from 38,000 FT" which was deleted under section G5 of the criteria for speedy deletion, but the page is still legitimate and valid because it was created 1 months ago. Please restore the page as I intend to work on it. -36.83.93.213 (talk) 06:06, 17 January 2017 (UTC)
- For this sort of thing you should ask the deleting admin Sphilbrick. You will have to show you are not related to the blocked user. Graeme Bartlett (talk) 06:33, 17 January 2017 (UTC)
Please Restore West Who Draft Page
(This user used the preload form for AFC undeletion, but did not specify the name of the AFC draft they would like undeleted. Consider checking their deleted contributions.) Cor225 (talk) 04:33, 17 January 2017 (UTC)
West Who
Please restore the West Who draft page. I am still working on getting this micronation entry up to date to be considered for Wikipedia.
Thank you,
John Farr
- Done - as an Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13, the page has been restored on request. Please edit the page to address any issues raised, and re-submit it; "Articles for creation" is not for the indefinite hosting of material found to be unsuitable for inclusion in the encyclopedia. Graeme Bartlett (talk) 06:37, 17 January 2017 (UTC)
Emit "Artist page"
Original author was banned or deleted, but the page is still legitimate and valid because it was created 3 years ago. "Save page" button below -Emitdfatt (talk) 19:09, 16 January 2017 (UTC)
Emitdfatt (talk) 19:09, 16 January 2017 (UTC)
- The page was at Emit (artist) · ( talk | logs | links | watch ) · [revisions]. Graeme Bartlett (talk) 22:12, 16 January 2017 (UTC)
- Hmm, looking at the deleted contributions, does that look like a valid G5 deletion? There are significant edits by users other than the sockpuppet, although that could be the sockpuppet editing while logged out. @JzG: this looks borderline although I did create WP:SPI/MusicLover650 on the requester just to be sure. ~Anachronist (talk) 01:36, 17 January 2017 (UTC)
- Article was deleted under WP:CSD#G5 as a creation by a banned or blocked user evading their restriction. The creator was also an undisclosed paid editor, in violation of the Terms of Use. All substantive edits to the article were by the undisclosed paid editor or one of a small number of IPs / accounts with no other history. In other words, blatant promotion, almost certainly paid for by the subject or his representatives, hence their apparent determination to get it back. REFUND is not, I think, the process for controversial undeletions of articles created abusively. Guy (Help!) 09:05, 17 January 2017 (UTC)
Marrickville Metro
Article was originally in a AFD debate and the result was delete. However Shirt58 (talk) and I believe this article is more than a run of the mill. Firstly the centre was built on what had previously been the "Vicars Woollen Mill" see http://adb.anu.edu.au/biography/vicars-sir-william-9273 in what I forgot to mention in the article. We believe that "Vicars Woollen Mill" should also be an article as it says about the history in that source. Secondly the centre management building is a "Heritage listed Mill House" in which I did not mention as I can see in an search on the Office of Environment and Heritage (New South Wales) website. Lastly it was the site of one of the first Aldi in Australia as referenced in the article http://www.abc.net.au/7.30/stories/s238058.htm. -BugMenn (talk) 06:34, 12 January 2017 (UTC)
- @BugMenn: Well, Shirt58 deleted the article in Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Marrickville Metro, so I am not quite understanding where you are in agreement that the article should be restored. I also don't see that you have asked Shirt58, the deleting admin, to consider restoring it, perhaps to draft space for further improvement. That is the correct procedure. We don't restore articles deleted via AFD by request on this page. ~Anachronist (talk) 07:03, 12 January 2017 (UTC)
- Hi all.
- I did make comments in the AfD discussion about how may potentially be improved. I admit that it is not to my credit, as an editor, that I did not implement those suggestions.
- I did delete the article, based on the arguments put forward in the discussion.
- I was asked by BugMenn to participate in this request for undeletion. I did not reply, which could be seen as a failure of my obligations as an WP:ADMIN. Perhaps my close of the discussion would have been sufficient enough to demonstrate why I would not participate in this discussion? Perhaps it was not.
- I stand by my AfD close decision. But we've identified problems. Now let's find solutions.
- The deleted article has been WP:USERFY-d to User:BugMenn/Marrickville Metro
- Pete AU aka --Shirt58 (talk) 10:38, 12 January 2017 (UTC)
- being the site of the first Aldi in Australia does not in itself mean inherent notability. LibStar (talk) 12:34, 17 January 2017 (UTC)
User:TyEvSkyo/Particle Sphere Theory
An article in my user space that was believed to be a hoax article has been deleted. It was not, however it did contain original research. This original research was going to be sourced in the future. It was a Work in Progress Article, and according to User pages, "Besides communication, other legitimate uses of user space include (but are not limited to):... Work in progress or material that you may come back to in future". Thus, this WIP article was not against the rules of Wikipedia.
Also, the page does not qualify for any of the criteria for speedy deletion, including the reason it was deleted (G3 criteria (Pure vandalism and blatant hoaxes)). Finally, the U5 criteria may apply. However, it does not, since the criteria states "with the exception of plausible drafts and pages adhering to Wikipedia:User pages#What may I have in my user pages?" -TyEvSkyo (talk) 01:12, 16 January 2017 (UTC)
- If you can come up with some references that show that such a topic exists, I will consider undeletion. If this is entirely original research and your new idea, then Wikipedia is not the pace for it. Find a journal that will publish it instead. Graeme Bartlett (talk) 10:13, 16 January 2017 (UTC)
- The Theory is a group of conglomeration of theories. I can show references for different parts of it (to name a few: Unification of the Forces Preons Superpostions The universe is not expanding White holes) TyEvSkyo (talk) 15:56, 16 January 2017 (UTC)
- I think we know that it's based on some physics, as many pseudoscientific theories are based on some small nugget of truth in their backgrounds. But you posit new particles that, as far as I can tell, have no basis in science. For instance, what's a reference for the existence of a gravisphere? And more importantly, where's any mention of the "particle sphere theory" as a whole? ~ Rob13Talk 16:54, 16 January 2017 (UTC)
- The name "Particle Sphere Theory" was tentative at best (as I said it was a WIP article). And see here and here for Gravisphere TyEvSkyo (talk) 21:40, 17 January 2017 (UTC)
- I think we know that it's based on some physics, as many pseudoscientific theories are based on some small nugget of truth in their backgrounds. But you posit new particles that, as far as I can tell, have no basis in science. For instance, what's a reference for the existence of a gravisphere? And more importantly, where's any mention of the "particle sphere theory" as a whole? ~ Rob13Talk 16:54, 16 January 2017 (UTC)
- The Theory is a group of conglomeration of theories. I can show references for different parts of it (to name a few: Unification of the Forces Preons Superpostions The universe is not expanding White holes) TyEvSkyo (talk) 15:56, 16 January 2017 (UTC)
Draft:Robert Bunger Zufall, MD
I, ELLENZUFALL, request the undeletion of this Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page as I intend to work on it. egz 16:32, 17 January 2017 (UTC)
I will finish editing now. -egz 16:48, 17 January 2017 (UTC)
Already done This was restored 3 days ago. ~Anachronist (talk) 22:06, 17 January 2017 (UTC)
Draft:Jennings Motor Group (2)
I, Scr81, request the undeletion of this Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page as I intend to work on it. Scr81 (talk) 11:11, 17 January 2017 (UTC)
- Done - as an Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13, the page has been restored on request. Please edit the page to address any issues raised, and re-submit it; "Articles for creation" is not for the indefinite hosting of material found to be unsuitable for inclusion in the encyclopedia. ~Anachronist (talk) 22:11, 17 January 2017 (UTC)
Draft:Pat Cassels
(This user used the preload form for AFC undeletion, but did not specify the name of the AFC draft they would like undeleted. Consider checking their deleted contributions.) Heywoodullman (talk) 16:56, 17 January 2017 (UTC)
- Done - as an Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13, the page has been restored on request. Please edit the page to address any issues raised, and re-submit it; "Articles for creation" is not for the indefinite hosting of material found to be unsuitable for inclusion in the encyclopedia. ~Anachronist (talk) 22:18, 17 January 2017 (UTC)
Draft:Outdoor Orientation Programs
I, Dennydad, request the undeletion of this Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page as I intend to work on it. Dennydad (talk) 17:18, 17 January 2017 (UTC)
I had a busy semester and was unable to spend the time on the document, but was just about to get back to it next week. If I could get the draft back, it would save me time in not having to recreate the page again. I have been collecting more web page resources and plan to add a list of the 191 outdoor orientation programs webpages. Thank you for your consideration.
- Done - as an Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13, the page has been restored on request. Please edit the page to address any issues raised, and re-submit it; "Articles for creation" is not for the indefinite hosting of material found to be unsuitable for inclusion in the encyclopedia. ~Anachronist (talk) 22:21, 17 January 2017 (UTC)
User:Athomeeditor/sandbox
I, Athomeeditor, request the undeletion of this Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page as I intend to work on it. Athomeeditor (talk) 06:54, 17 January 2017 (UTC)
- @Athomeeditor: I restored this before but you did nothing. What are you going to do this time if it is restored? Graeme Bartlett (talk) 08:51, 17 January 2017 (UTC)
- Done - as an Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13, the page has been restored on request. Please edit the page to address any issues raised, and re-submit it; "Articles for creation" is not for the indefinite hosting of material found to be unsuitable for inclusion in the encyclopedia. @Athomeeditor: Please work on it to improve it. Graeme Bartlett (talk) 23:52, 17 January 2017 (UTC)
Draft:Kinder Institute for Urban Research
Enter your reasoning here and then click the "Save page" button below -168.7.217.247 (talk) 18:17, 17 January 2017 (UTC)
- Done - as an Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13, the page has been restored on request. Please edit the page to address any issues raised, and re-submit it; "Articles for creation" is not for the indefinite hosting of material found to be unsuitable for inclusion in the encyclopedia. Graeme Bartlett (talk) 23:54, 17 January 2017 (UTC)
Draft:Formulae (software)
I, Lugalde, request the undeletion of this Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page as I intend to work on it. Lugalde (talk) 20:12, 17 January 2017 (UTC)
- Done - as an Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13, the page has been restored on request. Please edit the page to address any issues raised, and re-submit it; "Articles for creation" is not for the indefinite hosting of material found to be unsuitable for inclusion in the encyclopedia. Graeme Bartlett (talk) 23:56, 17 January 2017 (UTC)
Hannah Harrison Lowe
I think AfD is better than speedy deletion as the article was created very long ago. -GeoffreyT2000 (talk, contribs) 17:38, 17 January 2017 (UTC)
- Done - as a contested proposed deletion, the article has been restored on request. Looks like speedy deletion for a made up reason, so treating this as a Prod. Graeme Bartlett (talk) 23:59, 17 January 2017 (UTC)
List of Super Famicom and Super NES adventure games
The list contains information not present in List of Super Famicom games and List of Super Nintendo Entertainment System games, and in my opinion is more useful than those lists. -Calathan (talk) 01:09, 18 January 2017 (UTC)
- Done - as a contested proposed deletion, the article has been restored on request. ~Anachronist (talk) 04:01, 18 January 2017 (UTC)
List of Super Famicom and Super NES traditional games
- List of Super Famicom and Super NES traditional games · ( talk | logs | links | watch ) · [revisions]
While I agree that "traditional games" isn't really a video game genre, this list is one sub-part of the List of Super Famicom and Super NES games by genre, which contains more information and in my opinion is more useful than the separate List of Super Famicom games and List of Super Nintendo Entertainment System games articles. I'm hopeful that all of those lists can be worked into something better, and if so, the content of this sub-list of the genre list would be useful to include somewhere in the final list. I've started a discussion at Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Video games#Lists of video games by system and genre. -Calathan (talk) 01:20, 18 January 2017 (UTC)
- Done - as a contested proposed deletion, the article has been restored on request. ~Anachronist (talk) 04:03, 18 January 2017 (UTC)
Pyaari Yaari - Web Series
Very Good youth comedy web series -Yogitamishal (talk) 07:10, 18 January 2017 (UTC)
- Not done This was deleted because it was seen as unambiguous self-promotion (WP:G11) and would need a complete re-write to meet WP:NPOV guidelines. You can ask SpacemanSpiff if he'd be willing to e-mail you a copy of the article to clean, but I would recommend working on it in WP:AfC. I'm just concerned that there doesn't seem to be any coverage of the show in independent and reliable sources - it exists, but what you need here are news sources talking about the show. Tokyogirl79 (｡◕‿◕｡) 10:14, 18 January 2017 (UTC)
Galeries Lafayette Haussmann
Dear administrator, my article was deleted because considered as duplicated content (A:10) but it was dealing with Galeries Lafayette Haussmann which is different from Galeries Lafayette. In fact Galeries Lafayette is a worldwide brand whereas Galeries Lafayette Haussmann is a single shopping place located in Paris, with its own history. It's located in an emblematic building and has to be differenciated from the brand itself. Moreover, Galeries Lafayette and Galeries Lafayette Haussmann are both existing as separate contents in 26 languages, this is why I think it's important to have this page also available in english. Thank you for undeleting my article -Arthemisbilon (talk) 10:56, 18 January 2017 (UTC)
- It looks like the article has some serious issues with promotion, enough to where it would warrant deletion on that front alone. The article looks like it was closely paraphrased from this source and possibly others, enough to where it would run afoul of WP:COPYVIO. Tokyogirl79 (｡◕‿◕｡) 11:29, 18 January 2017 (UTC)
- This is a Not done as far as REFUND goes, but I will tag Bgwhite for you. It's just that this is so incredibly promotional that it would need to be completely re-written from scratch. Now as far as the separate pages on other language Wikipedias go, notability is different on each language's Wikipedia and the existence of separate articles on other language Wikipedias doesn't necessarily mean that the chain and the specific building would each merit individual pages. I'm not saying that it absolutely wouldn't merit different pages, just that each Wikipedia is different. I will say, however, that the page should not read like a promotional piece for the shopping place and offhand pages do not need to list each and every type of person the store sells to or all of the various restaurants or others that have storefronts as that comes across as more of a business directory. Tokyogirl79 (｡◕‿◕｡) 11:35, 18 January 2017 (UTC)
Draft: Anne Elizabeth (Author)
Anne Elizabeth is notable in her field, but I was not able to work on this article again until now due to totally unrelated circumstances. I want to complete the "hoop jumoing" required to get her article approved. -Odubhain (talk) 13:40, 18 January 2017 (UTC)
- Done - as an Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13, the page has been restored on request. Please edit the page to address any issues raised, and re-submit it; "Articles for creation" is not for the indefinite hosting of material found to be unsuitable for inclusion in the encyclopedia. Tokyogirl79 (｡◕‿◕｡) 14:23, 18 January 2017 (UTC)
Please restore draft or send copy
Dear Administrator,
for some time we have intended to publish on Wikipedia a page about the European Crystallographic Association. This proved to be difficult. As a truly European scientific organisation our members thus have created articles in other languages than English and have relied on my draft to translate the page to their native languages. Please restore this draft or send me a copy by e-mail.
I, ChemKrist, request the undeletion of this Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page as I intend to work on it. ChemKrist (talk) 17:50, 18 January 2017 (UTC)
- ChemKrist It looks like part of it was taken from here, so it's technically considered to be WP:COPYVIO. You can file a ticket through WP:OTRS giving Wikipedia permission to use the content, but be aware that this would place the content under the same creative commons licence that Wikipedia uses. I can email you the content, though. Tokyogirl79 (｡◕‿◕｡) 04:51, 19 January 2017 (UTC)
- You don't have an email enabled, so if you do that then I can send you the work. Tokyogirl79 (｡◕‿◕｡) 04:52, 19 January 2017 (UTC)
Jason Snyder
Enter your reasoning here and then click the "Save page" button below -170.200.144.19 (talk) 20:16, 18 January 2017 (UTC)
- Not done - this Requests for Undeletion process is only for articles that were deleted uncontroversially, and does not apply to articles deleted after a deletion discussion. Since the article you are here about was deleted after a discussion took place at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Jason Snyder, it cannot be undeleted through this process. However, if you believe that the outcome of the discussion did not reflect the consensus of the participants, or that significant new information has come to light since the article was deleted, you may contact the administrator who closed the discussion, user Joyous! (talk · contribs). After you do so, if your concerns are not addressed and you still seek undeletion, a request may be made at deletion review. Tokyogirl79 (｡◕‿◕｡) 04:57, 19 January 2017 (UTC)
- I'm concerned that this IP might be one of the Niaguru1968 socks evading a block, so I'm going to ping Bbb23 so he can check this out. Tokyogirl79 (｡◕‿◕｡) 04:57, 19 January 2017 (UTC)
Draft:Gregg Simpson
I, 50.64.120.172, request the undeletion of this Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page as I intend to work on it. 50.64.120.172 (talk) 15:33, 18 January 2017 (UTC)
- It looks like it was restored in November 2015 but no improvements were made to the page. There was an attempt to remove the G13 tag, but other than that there were no edits to the page. We need something to show that you will edit the page this time if it's restored, as AfC is not meant to be an indefinite storing facility for unfinished/unaccepted drafts. Tokyogirl79 (｡◕‿◕｡) 05:01, 19 January 2017 (UTC)
Draft:AMOMA.com
I, Tolsa2013, request the undeletion of this Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page as I intend to work on it. Tolsa2013 (talk) 14:57, 18 January 2017 (UTC)
- Done - as an Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13, the page has been restored on request. Please edit the page to address any issues raised, and re-submit it; "Articles for creation" is not for the indefinite hosting of material found to be unsuitable for inclusion in the encyclopedia. Tokyogirl79 (｡◕‿◕｡) 05:02, 19 January 2017 (UTC)
Draft:Astute Wheel
(This user used the preload form for AFC undeletion, but did not specify the name of the AFC draft they would like undeleted. Consider checking their deleted contributions.) Florenciamolla (talk) 23:42, 18 January 2017 (UTC)
- Florenciamolla: This is borderline promotional and parts of it do seem to be closely paraphrased from the company/product website. I can email you a copy of the article but this would need to be re-written in order to meet WP:NPOV guidelines. Tokyogirl79 (｡◕‿◕｡) 05:05, 19 January 2017 (UTC)
- Email sent. Tokyogirl79 (｡◕‿◕｡) 05:06, 19 January 2017 (UTC)
Draft:List of Indian record holders
Draft articles not eligible for speedy deletion. This applies to rejected or unsubmitted Articles for creation pages that have not been edited in over six months.Draft means under process. These Draft articles not eligible for speedy deletion .The user trying to attack only. This is attack and crate vandalism only.can use only following templates .G13. Only i created this article under ip user,i have no user id.It is attack on some NOTABLE persons listed in my article. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Criteria_for_speedy_deletion#G13._Abandoned_Articles_for_creation_submissions (106.76.61.185 (talk) 00:02, 19 January 2017 (UTC))
- Not done and will not be done It looks like this IP is Nsmutte, who has apparently been banned from Wikipedia as opposed to just blocked. Tokyogirl79 (｡◕‿◕｡) 05:07, 19 January 2017 (UTC)
Draft:Music Day UK
I, Musicdayuk, request the undeletion of this Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page as I intend to work on it. Musicdayuk (talk) 10:25, 19 January 2017 (UTC)
We have had a change of staff and the article should have been abandoned in the first place. We also face a challenge to our Intellectual Property from a commercialised organisation and we need to have some external documentation of our work. All previously offending terms and definitions will be remedied and external references added. -Musicdayuk (talk) 10:27, 19 January 2017 (UTC)
- Done Musicdayuk: I've restored the history, but you will need to change your username since you can't name your account after the organization. I also need to caution you that accounts should be operated by one person only and should not be a company/group account. I'll post more about this on your talk page. Tokyogirl79 (｡◕‿◕｡) 13:35, 19 January 2017 (UTC)
Calvin francisc lo
Please do not delete this page because it's too important to show client. -Calvin Franciss Lo (talk) 08:16, 19 January 2017 (UTC)
- Not done This page was deleted by RHaworth because it was considered to be unambiguously promotional. Wikipedia is not WP:LINKEDIN and is not a place to promote yourself to your clients. Tokyogirl79 (｡◕‿◕｡) 13:41, 19 January 2017 (UTC)
Draft:Franco Franco
I, Tereze Elpere, request the undeletion of this Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page as I intend to work on it. Tereze Elpere (talk) 08:28, 19 January 2017 (UTC)
The reason for deletion was: This submission's references do not adequately show the subject's notability. However, I have added more sources and since January 2017, the band is nominated for the national competition for Eurovision, so it should be available in Wikipedia -Tereze Elpere (talk) 08:31, 19 January 2017 (UTC)
- Tereze Elpere, it looks like it was the reason the page was declined at AfC - it was actually deleted as a stale draft. That said, however, there's no reason why I can't restore the draft for you to work on, so Done. Tokyogirl79 (｡◕‿◕｡) 13:45, 19 January 2017 (UTC)
Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Jagdishchandra Thakkar
- Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Jagdishchandra Thakkar · ( logs | links | watch ) · [revisions]
I, Viragthakkar, request the undeletion of this Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page as I intend to work on it. Viragthakkar (talk) 10:57, 19 January 2017 (UTC)
- Done - as an Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13, the page has been restored on request. Please edit the page to address any issues raised, and re-submit it; "Articles for creation" is not for the indefinite hosting of material found to be unsuitable for inclusion in the encyclopedia. The draft is now at Draft:Jagdishchandra Thakkar. Tokyogirl79 (｡◕‿◕｡) 13:47, 19 January 2017 (UTC)
Draft:Richards Bay Industrial Development Zone
I, Percy Langa, request the undeletion of this Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page as I intend to work on it. Percy Langa (talk) 11:06, 19 January 2017 (UTC)
- Done - as an Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13, the page has been restored on request. Please edit the page to address any issues raised, and re-submit it; "Articles for creation" is not for the indefinite hosting of material found to be unsuitable for inclusion in the encyclopedia. Tokyogirl79 (｡◕‿◕｡) 13:49, 19 January 2017 (UTC)
Draft:Miranda & Associados
I, ScootApp, request the undeletion of this Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page as I intend to work on it. ScootApp (talk) 11:55, 19 January 2017 (UTC)
Hi - I would like to revive and amend the draft. To be honest I had forgotten about it, which is why after 6 months it has been deleted. I would like to try and revise the text so that it is acceptable. Many thanks, ScootApp -ScootApp (talk) 11:57, 19 January 2017 (UTC)
- Done - as an Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13, the page has been restored on request. Please edit the page to address any issues raised, and re-submit it; "Articles for creation" is not for the indefinite hosting of material found to be unsuitable for inclusion in the encyclopedia. Tokyogirl79 (｡◕‿◕｡) 13:57, 19 January 2017 (UTC)
This page is actually a redirect to Dinesh_Prabhakar -Zeal4linux (talk) 13:40, 19 January 2017 (UTC)
- Done, but under the capitalization of Dinesh Nair. Tokyogirl79 (｡◕‿◕｡) 14:07, 19 January 2017 (UTC)
Chicago Area Radio Monitoring Association · ( talk | logs | links | watch | afd ) · [revisions] subst:refund|1= Chicago Area Radio Monitoring Association |2= Page had sufficient notability and was informative, accurate and properly cited.N9jig (talk) 19:28, 19 January 2017 (UTC)
- Not done - this Requests for Undeletion process is only for articles that were deleted uncontroversially, and does not apply to articles deleted after a deletion discussion. Since the article you are here about was deleted after a discussion took place at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Chicago Area Radio Monitoring Association, it cannot be undeleted through this process. However, if you believe that the outcome of the discussion did not reflect the consensus of the participants, or that significant new information has come to light since the article was deleted, you may contact the administrator who closed the discussion, user King_of_Hearts (talk · contribs). After you do so, if your concerns are not addressed and you still seek undeletion, a request may be made at deletion review. If you can find more substantial reliable independent references about the club I could make it a draft. Graeme Bartlett (talk) 20:36, 19 January 2017 (UTC)
Draft:Society of Quantitative Analysts
I, Petscm, request the undeletion of this Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page as I intend to work on it. Petscm (talk) 19:45, 19 January 2017 (UTC)
- Done - as an Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13, the page has been restored on request. Please edit the page to address any issues raised, and re-submit it; "Articles for creation" is not for the indefinite hosting of material found to be unsuitable for inclusion in the encyclopedia. Graeme Bartlett (talk) 20:39, 19 January 2017 (UTC)
Draft:Marty Lagina
I, Oak Island Kid, request the undeletion of this Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page as I intend to work on it. Oak Island Kid (talk) 03:54, 18 January 2017 (UTC)
- I have some concerns over the username, as Lagina is involved with digging on Oak Island and is involved with the TV show The Curse of Oak Island. You're likely a fan that named themselves after the show, but we still need to make sure. Tokyogirl79 (｡◕‿◕｡) 10:05, 18 January 2017 (UTC)
- This name has nothing to do with the show as I've used it for 30 years... Since I first saw an article in "National Geographic KIDS" before I was a teen... Oak Island Kid (talk) 17:04, 18 January 2017 (UTC)
- Done - as an Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13, the page has been restored on request. Please note that you never submitted the entry for review. When you are ready, you need to click the colored button in the template at the top of the page that says "Submit your draft for review!" There are no problems with the username. Graeme Bartlett (talk) 20:42, 19 January 2017 (UTC)
SnapComms
Article was originally deleted based on A7 and G11 guidelines however this page is about an organization of interest and features references to awards and articles which prove SnapComms' strong presence in the market "Save page" button below -Snapcomms.nicole (talk) 21:39, 19 January 2017 (UTC)
- Not done - this page was deleted in accordance with criterion for speedy deletion A7. If you believe that this decision was made in error, or that significant new information has come to light since the deletion, please contact the administrator who carried out the deletion, user DGG (talk · contribs). If you have already done so, your concerns can be taken to deletion review. Yunshui 雲水 21:54, 19 January 2017 (UTC)
- It remains an advertisement. A listing of minor awards referenced to their announcement in trade papers together with advertorials does not make an article. DGG ( talk ) 05:10, 20 January 2017 (UTC)
Neurological basis of Patanjali's Ashtanga Yoga
- Draft:Neurological basis of Patanjali's Ashtanga Yoga · ( talk | logs | links | watch ) · [revisions]
Enter your reasoning here and then click the "Save page" button below -Drking1234 (talk) 04:57, 20 January 2017 (UTC)
- Not done This was a cut/paste from here, which makes it a WP:COPYVIO. However there's another I must address and that is that this is more of an academic paper than it is an encyclopedia article, as it looks to be filled with WP:OR. I just don't see where it would fit in with Wikipedia. Something else to be cautious about is that while you can submit a ticket through WP:OTRS that would give Wikipedia permission to use the material, doing so would put it under a CC BY-SA 3.0 License. If you're fine with that then I'd suggest that you look at seeing what you would need to do in order to post it at Wikiversity. Tokyogirl79 (｡◕‿◕｡) 17:03, 20 January 2017 (UTC)
Draft:All Youths Tush Awards
I, Tush Dayo Pearl, request the undeletion of this Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page as I intend to work on it. Tush Dayo Pearl (talk) 01:46, 20 January 2017 (UTC)
Enter your reasoning here and then click the "Save page" button below -Tush Dayo Pearl (talk) 01:50, 20 January 2017 (UTC)
- Tush Dayo Pearl, it looks like there was a request to restore this page back in February 2016, but no edits were made. We need to have some type of guarantee that you will edit the page if we restore it a second time. Tokyogirl79 (｡◕‿◕｡) 17:05, 20 January 2017 (UTC)
Draft: List of members of DC Talk
I, WIKIswagmaster842, request the undeletion of this Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page as I intend to work on it. WIKIswagmaster842t@lk 23:31, 19 January 2017 (UTC)
- WIKIswagmaster842 It looks like this is already covered in the main page for the group. Given that the overall amount of members have been fairly small, I don't know that this would really merit a spinoff article. I can email you a copy of the content (you just need to enable the email function), but the chances of this getting approved as a spinoff article are very low. Tokyogirl79 (｡◕‿◕｡) 17:09, 20 January 2017 (UTC)
Otherwind_Games
- Otherwind_Games · ( talk | logs | links | watch ) · [revisions]
- I, Almartor, request the undeletion of this Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page as I intend to work on it. Almartor (talk) 17:45, 20 January 2017 (UTC)
- Not done Almartor, this was a redirect from mainspace to draft space. We don't do those. I have restored Draft:Otherwind Games for you--but seriously, this needs to be finished. Drmies (talk) 17:50, 20 January 2017 (UTC)
Sia (software)
There result should not be delete. There were 5 keep votes and only 3 for delete. --RezonansowyakaRezy (talk | contribs) 21:54, 20 January 2017 (UTC)
- The correct venue is WP:DRV. Also, see WP:!VOTE. — JJMC89 (T·C) 22:19, 20 January 2017 (UTC)
- OK, thanks. --RezonansowyakaRezy (talk | contribs) 22:32, 20 January 2017 (UTC)
Draft:Marimba One
I, Nicoler2014, request the undeletion of this Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page as I intend to work on it. Nicoler2014 (talk) 18:29, 20 January 2017 (UTC)
We would like to edit the page and try again to have our page accepted -Nicoler2014 (talk) 18:32, 20 January 2017 (UTC)
Declined for now. Please answer:- Who is "we"? How many people can log in using the Nicoler2014 account?
- Why have you not publicly disclosed your conflict of interest, as you agreed to abide by Wikimedia:Terms of Use requiring such disclosure, when you registered your account?
- The draft was already restored once before, six months ago, and while some changes were made on that day of restoration, absolutely nothing was done since then. What would you do different this time, given that you already had six months? ~Anachronist (talk) 21:31, 21 January 2017 (UTC)
Draft:Badger Maps
I, Jack Willow, request the undeletion of this Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page as I intend to work on it. Update: Over the last year and a half numerous new sources have sprung up (of credibility) and I would like to add these sources as I believe the page will meet/exceed the requirements necessary to be legitimate. Jack W. 18:56, 20 January 2017 (UTC)
- That's a reasonable argument. Done, restored for the second (and last) time. ~Anachronist (talk) 21:38, 21 January 2017 (UTC)
Gammadyne Mailer
The deletion debate only lasted 12 days, and all of the comments in the debate occurred before I rewrote the article to fix its problems. The article needs work, not deletion. There is no basis for saying it is not notable, that is an arbitrary opinion. Grozo (talk) 05:35, 21 January 2017 (UTC) -Grozo (talk) 05:35, 21 January 2017 (UTC)
- @Grozo: "Only" 12 days? That's 5 days longer than a deletion discussion is supposed to last. In any case, articles deleted via AfD are ineligible for restoration by request on this page. Contact the deleting administrator Joyous!, asking to reconsider or at least userfy the article so you can improve it. Failing that, the correct venue is WP:DRV. ~Anachronist (talk) 21:41, 21 January 2017 (UTC)
User:PJT1957/sandbox
I, PJT1957, request the undeletion of this Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page as I intend to work on it. PJT1957 (talk) 09:53, 21 January 2017 (UTC)
- @PJT957: Done - as an Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13, the page has been restored on request. Please edit the page to address any issues raised, and re-submit it; "Articles for creation" is not for the indefinite hosting of material found to be unsuitable for inclusion in the encyclopedia. ~Anachronist (talk) 22:54, 21 January 2017 (UTC)
Atlas of World History: non-profit, government funded website (USA Department of Education)
Enter your reasoning here and then click the "Save page" button below -Comte arnau (talk) 13:27, 21 January 2017 (UTC)
Hi, I'm contributing in different geography articles and describing map resources for education that are useful and have their importance in the internet historical geography world. The article about "Atlas of World history" was not even finished and was deleted. It's not a first row website, but has received funding by US department of education and it's very useful for teachers and education in general. It has as place in wikipedia. Also, "A7" criterion has an exclusion for education institutions. This is a non-profit, government funded website.
Please, reconsider the deletion of "Atlas of World history" article.
- Not done - this page was deleted in accordance with criterion for speedy deletion A7. If you believe that this decision was made in error, or that significant new information has come to light since the deletion, please contact the administrator who carried out the deletion, user Randykitty (talk · contribs). If you have already done so, your concerns can be taken to deletion review. ~Anachronist (talk) 23:01, 21 January 2017 (UTC)
Draft:Hookum Chan (Tchan)
Enter your reasoning here and then click the "Save page" button below -Gadhar1 (talk) 00:27, 22 January 2017 (UTC) The page was not accepted because it did not meet the golden rule. At the time I was unable to provide further information. However, since that time I've found published sources that refer to the subject of the post - which I think will probably meet the golden rule. Thank you.
- Done - as an Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13, the page has been restored on request. Please edit the page to address any issues raised, and re-submit it; "Articles for creation" is not for the indefinite hosting of material found to be unsuitable for inclusion in the encyclopedia. ~Anachronist (talk) 01:11, 22 January 2017 (UTC)
Enchanted Island Amusement Park
Enter your reasoning here and then click the "Save page" button below -Upkeephubwebmaster (talk) 12:47, 21 January 2017 (UTC) This articles is for information how Enchanted Island Amusement Park, it's history of how people save the park.
- Not done, nothing to do. The article isn't deleted. ~Anachronist (talk) 22:58, 21 January 2017 (UTC)
- The article has since been deleted and it's still a "not done", as it was deleted per WP:G11 and WP:G12. Tokyogirl79 (｡◕‿◕｡) 05:24, 22 January 2017 (UTC)
Carl Kosta Savich
I mentioned in the deletion discussion that I'd like this to be moved into my userspace so I could rehab the article and perhaps re-publish it years from now. Chris Troutman (talk) 02:18, 22 January 2017 (UTC) -Chris Troutman (talk) 02:18, 22 January 2017 (UTC)
- Pinging King of Hearts. Tokyogirl79 (｡◕‿◕｡) 05:22, 22 January 2017 (UTC)
- Done - at User:Chris troutman/Carl Kosta Savich. -- King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 05:28, 22 January 2017 (UTC)