Wikipedia:Requests for undeletion/Archive 52
 | This is an archive of past discussions on Wikipedia:Requests for undeletion. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current main page. |
| Archive 45 | ← | Archive 50 | Archive 51 | Archive 52 | Archive 53 | Archive 54 | Archive 55 |
Chris St Clair
A noted Canadian Broadcaster and Best Selling Canadian Author -67.193.124.12 (talk) 23:24, 6 October 2011 (UTC)
Done ... as I can attest to the notability. You'll need to add some additional third party reliable sources PDQ. (talk→ BWilkins ←track) 23:30, 6 October 2011 (UTC)
David R. Hertz
Permission for use of the content at http://studioea.com/profile/ received in OTRS ticket 2011100610019895 for release under the CC-BY-SA-3.0 and GFDL by sender from same domain as source information. -– Adrignola talk 15:09, 7 October 2011 (UTC)
Comtech Credit Union
I have edited the article ensuring it is not biased and it is not used for promotion of the brand. I'm not sure where I can send the article to ensure it follows all guidelines. -Melissa sholhan (talk) 15:42, 7 October 2011 (UTC)
Note: This page isn't for reviewing drafts; it is only for undeleting certain types of articles that were deleted without a discussion. Try WP:Articles for creation instead. —Jeremy v^_^v Components:V S M 19:27, 7 October 2011 (UTC)
Grace Helbig
This article about a living person has been created in the past without a coherent structure or sufficient sources that would establish notability. It has been protected indefinitely from being created because there were two denied articles in a single day (see logs). This happened because the person the article is about had made a joke that day about not having a Wikipedia article about herself. I (with others) have spent several hours on researching and writing a new article in my userspace (User:Lunferd/Grace_Helbig) that I feel deserves a fair review. -Lunferd (talk) 17:50, 7 October 2011 (UTC)
- Note: This page isn't for reviewing userspace drafts or for requestng unprotection of titles; it is only for undeleting certain types of articles that were deleted without a discussion. Try WP:Articles for creation (for the userspace draft) and WP:Requests for page protection#Requests for unprotection (for the unprotection) instead. —Jeremy v^_^v Components:V S M 19:26, 7 October 2011 (UTC)
- Sorry about that, I'm not too familiar with the system yet. Thanks for the hint.Lunferd (talk) 19:29, 7 October 2011 (UTC)
- Null perspiration. —Jeremy v^_^v Components:V S M 19:38, 7 October 2011 (UTC)
- Sorry about that, I'm not too familiar with the system yet. Thanks for the hint.Lunferd (talk) 19:29, 7 October 2011 (UTC)
Jason Banton
Player mewwets notability standards having played a fully professional game -Jimmy Skitz's Answer Machine 21:43, 4 October 2011 (UTC)
- Note: Article was deleted as a G5. Skitzouk, are you willing to take responsibility for the sanctioned user's edits for that article? —Jeremy v^_^v Components:V S M 22:27, 4 October 2011 (UTC)
- There are a number of regular editors than contribute towards Leicester City related articles, between us I believe we can ensure the article remains factual. Jimmy Skitz's Answer Machine 10:40, 5 October 2011 (UTC)
- Any update for this 1, I'll take responcibility for it and I know others will help improve it over time as well. Jimmy Skitz's Answer Machine 12:14, 8 October 2011 (UTC)
- An admin can take this one at any time. :/ —Jeremy v^_^v Components:V S M 14:58, 8 October 2011 (UTC)
- Any update for this 1, I'll take responcibility for it and I know others will help improve it over time as well. Jimmy Skitz's Answer Machine 12:14, 8 October 2011 (UTC)
- There are a number of regular editors than contribute towards Leicester City related articles, between us I believe we can ensure the article remains factual. Jimmy Skitz's Answer Machine 10:40, 5 October 2011 (UTC)
File:BrunoTonioli2009.jpg
Bruno Tonioli needs a picture. -Plankton5165 (talk) 11:46, 8 October 2011 (UTC)
- Note: Surely you jest! This file never existed! —Jeremy v^_^v Components:V S M 15:00, 8 October 2011 (UTC)
- If you meant File:Bruno2009.jpg,
Not done - this page is a copyright violation of Contactmusic.com (per watermark). January (talk) 17:37, 8 October 2011 (UTC)
dcvg
DCVG is a valid topic. Although I am not the author of the deleted page, I believe it has merit as it is a technique widely used throughout the pipeline industry. I believe the page was deleted via an expired PROD notice - as it's a fairly specialised topic it may not have been accessed in time for anyone to respond to the notice. -57.66.110.252 (talk) 17:23, 8 October 2011 (UTC)
- Note: Report modified to point to the correct page. Remember that page titles on Wikipedia are case-sensitive. —Jeremy v^_^v Components:V S M 17:45, 8 October 2011 (UTC)
- Done - as a contested proposed deletion, the article has been restored on request. It still looks more like a merge candidate than a separate topic.--Tikiwont (talk) 20:37, 8 October 2011 (UTC)
Johan Verheyden
As per the arguments for deletion cited:
This spokesperson/journalist is not widely cited by peers according to any sources given.: please see: http://www.uread.com/book/belgian-journalists-llc-books-group/9781156039021 & http://www.powells.com/biblio/9781155544403?&PID=719
The article reads like a CV, with external links to works by the subject . Other than the fact they were published, there is no indication of notability or neutrality in this article content, and much remains uncited after more than two years. JFHJr (㊟) 22:38, 12 September 2011 (UTC) The links to publications are of course by the subject - as it are his publications...
Delete - He was the OSCE spokesperson, so he was quoted a lot in the press, but I cannot find any significant coverage about him that would establish notability. -- Whpq (talk) 16:37, 13 September 2011 (UTC) & Delete: per above. It's a common fallacy at AfD for Keep proponents to ignore the explicit statement that quotes from someone in the press do not establish notability for the spokesman. Ravenswing 17:42, 13 September 2011 (UTC) -Jverheyden (talk) 18:10, 8 October 2011 (UTC) 'Please see:
- http://dialnet.unirioja.es/servlet/fichero_articulo?codigo=2143291&orden=0
- http://www.nato.int/sfor/trans/1997/t971006a.htm
- http://www.ohr.int/ohr-offices/mostar/transcripts/default.asp?content_id=7287
'
- Note: Article was deleted as a result of an AfD debate. Admins will not undelete such articles here; go to WP:Deletion review instead. —Jeremy v^_^v Components:V S M 18:14, 8 October 2011 (UTC)
- Not done because of the consensus discussion linked above. Before going to deletion review please review the guidelines on reliable sources and conflict of interest and if there is something beyond press conference transcripts contact first with the deleting admininstrator, Courcelles. --Tikiwont (talk) 20:56, 8 October 2011 (UTC)
Specialized city
I really don't understand why you deleted it. It was a total concept of urban geography and city planning. i would like to restore the article as it was. פארוק (talk) 20:07, 8 October 2011 (UTC)
- Done Already restored by the deleting admin. --Ron Ritzman (talk) 21:09, 8 October 2011 (UTC)
- thanks פארוק (talk) 22:10, 8 October 2011 (UTC)
Markovian Parallax Denigrate
This was something that happened in 1996, where a bunch of Usenet groups were spammed with a message of random words under the title "Markovian Parallax Denigrate". Due to the name, the solving the encryption would mean utilizing Markov Chain, but no one has ever been able to decipher the message. It was a real event and why this article was deleted, I'll never know. The guy who deleted it, Cris, claimed that "merely existing does not warrant having an article on Wikipedia". Which is the stupidest thing I've ever heard, because everything on this site is on here because it exists, or is believed to exist. This is verifiable, the US Government I think even arrested the person whose email address the message was sent from, either that, or they just investigated. You can even read copies of the message on other sites. -72.243.5.210 (talk) 21:35, 8 October 2011 (UTC)
- Not done - As announced at the top of the page, this process is only for articles that were deleted uncontroversially and has no applicability to articles deleted after any deletion discussion. Since the article you are here about was deleted at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Markovian parallax denigrate, it cannot be undeleted through this process. Nevertheless, if you believe that the consensus found at the discussion was in error, or that significant new information has come to light since the deletion, you may contact the administrator who closed the discussion, user Cirt (talk · contribs). After you do so, if your concerns are not addressed and you still seek undeletion, a request may be made at deletion review. GB fan 21:44, 8 October 2011 (UTC)
Pat Paulsen's Half A Comedy Hour
Noteworthy, as it was a network TV series in 1970. -Abbythecat (talk) 05:54, 9 October 2011 (UTC)
- Done. --Ron Ritzman (talk) 13:31, 10 October 2011 (UTC)
A Real American Hero (TV movie)
Notable CBS TV movie based on popular movie. -Abbythecat (talk) 05:57, 9 October 2011 (UTC)
- Note: Fixed report to point to correct page; remember that all titles on Wikipedia are case sensitive. —Jeremy v^_^v Components:V S M 16:36, 9 October 2011 (UTC)
- Done. --Ron Ritzman (talk) 13:31, 10 October 2011 (UTC)
Walking Tall (TV series)
Notable NBC network TV series based on popular movie. -Abbythecat (talk) 05:59, 9 October 2011 (UTC)
- Note: Fixed report to point to correct page; remember that all titles on Wikipedia are case sensitive. —Jeremy v^_^v Components:V S M 16:37, 9 October 2011 (UTC)
- Done. --Ron Ritzman (talk) 13:32, 10 October 2011 (UTC)
Tim Tam And The Turn-Ons
Noteworthy rock group who had song hit national Billboard chart. -Abbythecat (talk) 06:02, 9 October 2011 (UTC)
- Done. --Ron Ritzman (talk) 13:33, 10 October 2011 (UTC)
Hank Williams: The Show He Never Gave
Notable movie about country music legend. -Abbythecat (talk) 06:04, 9 October 2011 (UTC)
- Done. --Ron Ritzman (talk) 13:33, 10 October 2011 (UTC)
Horror Island (film)
Noteworthy horror film from Universal with The Phantom, one of Universal's better monster/villains. -Abbythecat (talk) 06:07, 9 October 2011 (UTC)
- Done. --Ron Ritzman (talk) 13:34, 10 October 2011 (UTC)
Tear Drop City (Song)
Notable single, first by Monkees as trio, hit national Billboard chart. -Abbythecat (talk) 06:09, 9 October 2011 (UTC)
- Note: Fixed report to point to correct page; remember that all titles on Wikipedia are case sensitive. —Jeremy v^_^v Components:V S M 16:41, 9 October 2011 (UTC)
- Done. --Ron Ritzman (talk) 13:34, 10 October 2011 (UTC)
Listen To The Band (Song)
Hit Billboard chart, notable group Monkees. -Abbythecat (talk) 06:12, 9 October 2011 (UTC)
- Note: Fixed report to point to correct page; remember that all titles on Wikipedia are case sensitive. —Jeremy v^_^v Components:V S M 16:42, 9 October 2011 (UTC)
- Done. --Ron Ritzman (talk) 13:35, 10 October 2011 (UTC)
Oh My My (Monkees Song)
restoring page I wrote & deleted. -Abbythecat (talk) 06:15, 9 October 2011 (UTC)
- Note: Fixed report to point to correct page; remember that all titles on Wikipedia are case sensitive. Note that the page had been moved, so I have adjusted the report to point at the final landing spot of the page. —Jeremy v^_^v Components:V S M 16:44, 9 October 2011 (UTC)
- Done. I've restored all pages you requested deletion per CSD G7 and I'm sorry that your first experiences here weren't pleasant. --Ron Ritzman (talk) 13:38, 10 October 2011 (UTC)
Donald Braswell
It was just discovered that Donald Braswell's wiki page has been deleted. I cannot now see what discussions were held regarding it's deletion, if there were any, and the reason the page was removed other than a PROD request. Donald Braswell was a Broadway star in the 1950's and was a performer at the 1968 world's fair at the Hemisphere. His list of credits, including his appearance on the Ed Sullivan show were listed on his page. He is the father of America's Got Talent Donald Brawell II. I would like to respectfully request that the page be restored. Thank you. -Wikiauthenticity (talk) 18:10, 9 October 2011 (UTC)
- Done - as a contested proposed deletion, the article has been restored on request. GB fan 23:55, 9 October 2011 (UTC)
File:Indiana Jones in Raiders of the Lost Ark.jpg
deleted due to IP vandalism about two weeks ago, in use in article. And can someone ask User:Fastily to SlowDown-ily? Several useful images have been zoinked recently without checking if their deletion is in fact warranted. -Kintetsubuffalo (talk) 10:02, 10 October 2011 (UTC)
- Restored. Nyttend (talk) 04:04, 11 October 2011 (UTC)
Released under CC-BY-SA-3.0 in OTRS ticket 2011100910004252. -– Adrignola talk 13:32, 10 October 2011 (UTC)
- Restored per OTRS. Nyttend (talk) 03:51, 11 October 2011 (UTC)
File:A500 and A50 Junction.JPG
The image was moved to Commons but isn't displaying correctly. -Peter E. James (talk) 16:58, 10 October 2011 (UTC)
- Done Commons isn't coming through now. Skier Dude (talk) 04:13, 11 October 2011 (UTC)
Bhavsar Online Community
reasoning -Bmarao88 (talk) 20:13, 10 October 2011 (UTC)
- Not done - this article has not been restored because it does not appear to meet our guidelines for inclusion of articles concerning people. In general, Wikipedia considers a topic to be notable if there exist multiple reliable sources of information on the topic, external to the subject itself. Articles concerning people will be deleted on sight if they are considered to be unambiguous advertising or promotion, or if they do not contain a credible assertion of the significance of the subject. This was an advertisement for an obscure website, and has no place here. --Orangemike (talk) 20:25, 10 October 2011 (UTC)
Bad Blood (game)
As someone interested in old computer games, I was utterly stunned to find that this game, a multi-platform (DOS/Commodore 64) release by a major computer game company (Origin Systems, creators of the Ultima series amongst others), was not deemed worthy of having a Wikipedia page, when I have found countless intact pages for far more obscure and even self-published games. The article was originally deleted due to "(A7: No explanation of the subject's significance (real person, animal, organization, or web content))" and I do not even understand how a computer game falls into this category. The MobyGames page [1] illustrates contemporary reviews of the product from major gaming magazines and shows screenshots from the DOS and Commodore 64 versions of the game. It was designed by Chris Roberts, designer of many other significant and successful games (such as the Wing Commander series and Freelancer [2]). It is an early example of post-apocalyptic computer gaming, a genre that has exploded in popularity in recent years due to games like Fallout 3, S.T.A.L.K.E.R., Metro 2033, and others. -174.31.152.159 (talk) 21:03, 8 October 2011 (UTC)
- Note: Article was deleted as an A7. Also note that, per WP:Notability, a subject must be notable in and of itself; it cannot "inherit" notability from related subjects. —Jeremy v^_^v Components:V S M 02:32, 9 October 2011 (UTC)
- I do not understand how the simple fact that it was a major computer game release by a major publisher does not make it inherently notable? 174.31.152.159 (talk) 22:59, 9 October 2011 (UTC)
- Done A7 does not apply to games (unless online only) so this was deleted out of policy. And articles only have to make a claim of importance, (not necessarily prove notability) to escape A7 speedy delete. Graeme Bartlett (talk) 05:23, 11 October 2011 (UTC)
- Thank you very much! The system works! 174.31.152.159 (talk) 04:18, 12 October 2011 (UTC)
- I do not understand how the simple fact that it was a major computer game release by a major publisher does not make it inherently notable? 174.31.152.159 (talk) 22:59, 9 October 2011 (UTC)
File:Austral-asia cup.jpg.
I ve already provided the non-free rationale and while uploading image it didn't show any warning relating to speedy deletion -M.A.R 1993 (talk) 07:07, 11 October 2011 (UTC)
Note: Surely you jest! No page's ever existed under that title! —Jeremy v^_^v Components:V S M 16:08, 11 October 2011 (UTC)
- Done Requester put a dot on the end of the name. File:Austral-asia cup.jpg was notified on the uploader's talk page and still needs a fair use rationale to be supplied. There is none there yet. Graeme Bartlett (talk) 01:31, 12 October 2011 (UTC)
Aron Xantus
the article was a verifiable encyclopedic content, with no copyright violation. Please check again. Thanks for your help. Dr. Camelia Navrotchi (<redacted>) -Navrotchi Camelia (talk) 09:25, 11 October 2011 (UTC)
Buna ziua, Numele meu este Aron Xantus si va contactez in legatura cu biografia mea postata pe site-ul Dvs. de catre o sursa nespecificata. Tin sa precizez ca aceasta biografie despre mine contine numeroase erori si in consecinta va solicit sa indepartati articolul alaturat: http://referate-x.com/x/aron-xantus.html Va multumesc pentru intelegere.
Cu stima, Aron Xantus
- Note: The page was speedily-deleted under criterion G12. Pages deleted under that criterion are generally not undeleted because they require complete rewrites to be viable encyclopedia articles or because they violate our biographical policy. —Jeremy v^_^v Components:V S M 16:05, 11 October 2011 (UTC)
Grey2K USA
Release of content at http://www.grey2kusa.org/who/index.html received in OTRS ticket 2011100610020016 under CC-BY-SA-3.0 and GFDL by company representative. -– Adrignola talk 17:59, 11 October 2011 (UTC)
zFTPServer
Product still active -46.59.76.31 (talk) 19:45, 11 October 2011 (UTC)
- But is it notable? This is a duplicate request from last week (talk→ BWilkins ←track) 20:13, 11 October 2011 (UTC)
- The article zFTPServer Suite has been restored, yet continues to have significant issues. I will advise the WP:PRODder, should they choose to submit it to WP:AFD (talk→ BWilkins ←track) 20:28, 11 October 2011 (UTC)
Note added 2011-10-13: The article has been altered to be more general and less "selling".
Hyeonki Moon
please look at the contest page. I did fix the problem. -Tweeter10 (talk) 20:51, 11 October 2011 (UTC)
- Not done - this article has not been restored because it does not appear to meet our guidelines for inclusion of articles concerning people. In general, Wikipedia considers a topic to be notable if there exist multiple reliable sources of information on the topic, external to the subject itself. Articles concerning people will be deleted on sight if they are considered to be unambiguous advertising or promotion, or if they do not contain a credible assertion of the significance of the subject. January (talk) 21:00, 11 October 2011 (UTC)
Best Friend Club
I would like to have this article temporarily undeleted so that I can use the information on a website that we are working on. Unfortunately, when writing the article we failed to save it on our computer. If at all possible I would just like to be able to see the article and copy the information so I can paste it and save it as a word document on my personal computer.I believe the reason that it the article was originally deleted was due to improper/no citations....A7 code. Thank you for your help. I really appreciate it. -Stamosp (talk) 02:50, 12 October 2011 (UTC)
- Nothing at that location I'm afraid [3]. If you know the ip address or name of the useraccount that was used to make the article then I can easily find it from the deleted contributions. Spartaz Humbug! 02:54, 12 October 2011 (UTC)
- The useraccount name should be realstamosp.
- Done The account was Reaslstamosp, page name "Best Friends Club". E-mailed copy to user as requested. m.o.p 05:45, 12 October 2011 (UTC)
Institute of Rural Management Pakistan
The article meets the wikipedia criteria of notability and Verifiability. All the sources, references and external links have been cited. If still there is any issue with the article please indicate it instead of just nominating it for deletion without any reason. Looking forward to the guidance of the editors and administrator. -Samar Saeed Akhtar (talk) 10:54, 12 October 2011 (UTC)
- Note: The page in question is not deleted yet — it’s in AfD process… Skarebo (talk) 10:58, 12 October 2011 (UTC)
- Not done This article has not yet been deleted, and is under discussion at AFD - all discussion should be done there. See WP:DELETE and WP:AFD for assistance in the process, including how to make policy-based arguments at AFD. Note: personnel directly involved in an organization often have WP:COI and may have difficulty seeing notability objectively (I'm not sure if you're directly involved, but it's just a friendly note) (talk→ BWilkins ←track) 11:30, 12 October 2011 (UTC)
Billy Corben
Release under CC-BY-SA-3.0 and GFDL received from rakontur representative in OTRS ticket 2011101110016762. They linked to http://30for30.espn.com/film/the-u.html while the deleting administrator linked to http://wintermusicconference.com/events/schedule/2011/panelist/160420/Billy+Corben+-+Rakontur.html. But they said they have provided the biography to many publications. Also found his biography on the production company's site. -– Adrignola talk 12:57, 12 October 2011 (UTC)
- Done but moved to the incubator (link) as it's an unsourced BLP. Also, considering the creator's username, I'm concerned that there is a serious conflict of interest here. IMHO they should have waited for a neutral editor with no connection to the subject to take note of him and write an article. --Ron Ritzman (talk) 13:11, 12 October 2011 (UTC)
George Spanky McCurdy
Well-known drummer and producer -129.112.109.245 (talk) 20:50, 12 October 2011 (UTC)
- Not done - a deleted page with this name does not appear to exist. --Orange Mike | Talk 20:54, 12 October 2011 (UTC)
- The article was George "Spanky" McCurdy · ( talk | logs | history | links | watch ) · [revisions] - it seems to have been a PROD deletion with reason "No real evidence of notability". Peter E. James (talk) 23:23, 12 October 2011 (UTC)
- And it was an unsourced BLP so Not done. --Ron Ritzman (talk) 01:36, 13 October 2011 (UTC)
- Book / news search doesn't suggest notability. Bongomatic 01:38, 13 October 2011 (UTC)
- And it was an unsourced BLP so
- The article was George "Spanky" McCurdy · ( talk | logs | history | links | watch ) · [revisions] - it seems to have been a PROD deletion with reason "No real evidence of notability". Peter E. James (talk) 23:23, 12 October 2011 (UTC)
World Bible Center
I don't see no reason to delete this value, just as there as a projects that were never built are written articles about them. If you've read it all then you will see that this building should start to be built next month sponsored by the Israeli government. פארוק (talk) 20:02, 8 October 2011 (UTC)
- Note: Article was deleted as an A7. —Jeremy v^_^v Components:V S M 02:30, 9 October 2011 (UTC)
- Done but article needs serious cleanup. Graeme Bartlett (talk) 11:50, 13 October 2011 (UTC)
- Details that translated from Hebrew are still missing were. I'll try to find more information and fix it. פארוק (talk) 17:18, 13 October 2011 (UTC)
Mastic ice cream.
I think that the deletion was not right at all. פארוק (talk) 20:11, 8 October 2011 (UTC)
- I have redirected this to Dondurma which was the preexisting article on the topic. Look in the history if there is content that needs to be merged. Graeme Bartlett (talk) 05:33, 11 October 2011 (UTC)
- For the million times !!! Turkish Mastic ice cream IS NOT Syrian Mastic ice cream !!!
And therefore they both called: Mastic ice cream. look at the Discussion page. please return this article back. פארוק (talk) 17:25, 13 October 2011 (UTC)
The End Records
PROD'ded twice, which is not allowed according to WP:PROD. Both were done by User:Fastily. -Chubbles (talk) 18:18, 10 October 2011 (UTC)
- Declined I understand the relevant policy page to mean that a page may not be deleted via PROD if someone's already objected to that process. On this article, nobody objected to the PROD the first time, so it was eligible the second time. Of course, if you want the content itself, we'll undelete. Nyttend (talk) 03:59, 11 October 2011 (UTC)
- Nyttend, the fact he's here, in and of itself, means it's a contested PROD. —Jeremy v^_^v Components:V S M 18:22, 11 October 2011 (UTC)
- This label is definitely notable: The page has more than 200 incoming links, and there are third-party sources to establish notability (see, for example, [4] and [5]). If restoring it as-is is a problem, it could be userfied to my account, and I'll add a couple notability-related references before returning it to article space. -ShelfSkewed Talk 02:15, 13 October 2011 (UTC)
- Done Looks like requested by two people now. Graeme Bartlett (talk) 11:25, 13 October 2011 (UTC)
The page was about me, and was originally written by a third person, and so had a number of errors. I corrected these errors and expanded the information. Would like to have the page back please. -92.232.175.132 (talk) 22:13, 10 October 2011 (UTC)
- Not done Though deleted by proposed deletion, the article in question was an unsourced biography of a living person. However, any logged in editor is free to write a new sourced article but that editor should not be you or anybody associated with you. It's best to wait for a neutral editor to write a new sourced article from a neutral point of view. --Ron Ritzman (talk) 02:09, 11 October 2011 (UTC)
The original was submitted by someone else - I just corrected the things they got wrong!! I can't see how correcting the errors made the page delete-worthy!
- The issue is lack of sources. Unsourced biographies of living people are, in practice (but not in policy) speedy-deletable. —Jeremy v^_^v Components:V S M 05:15, 12 October 2011 (UTC)
- Unsourced biographies are not speedy deletable on that basis alone. Thparkth (talk) 10:32, 12 October 2011 (UTC)
- No they're not and I don't go looking for unsourced BLPs to delete. However, I won't restore them here even if they are expired PRODs but I'll be glad to userfy or incubate them if asked though the best thing to do if someone wants an article on a living person is to write a new one with sources. --Ron Ritzman (talk) 01:43, 13 October 2011 (UTC)
- Unsourced biographies are not speedy deletable on that basis alone. Thparkth (talk) 10:32, 12 October 2011 (UTC)
But I *am* the source of information about *me*!?!
- We cannot accept you as a source about yourself. For all we know, you're lying or exaggerating. This is why we require that all articles have at least two reliable third-party sources to verify the content. See also WP:Notability (people). —Jeremy v^_^v Components:V S M 19:37, 13 October 2011 (UTC)
Adzuna
Article (not written by me) seems to have been removed some time ago for speedy deletion under G11 advertising. I wish to review the content to see if it can be improved or if the deletion should be discussed - the business seems notable to me. If not appropriate to undelete, please move into my userspace -Moneybagsuk (talk) 12:27, 13 October 2011 (UTC)
- Done Moved to User:Moneybagsuk/Adzuna Skier Dude (talk) 05:41, 14 October 2011 (UTC)
The Men That WIll Not Be Blamed For Nothing
- The Men That Will Not Be Blamed for Nothing · ( talk | logs | history | links | watch ) · [revisions]
the page for this band appears to have been deleted without any need, they are a British punk band with a number of releases, media coverage and a fan base -86.6.111.127 (talk) 14:01, 13 October 2011 (UTC)
- Note: Fixed report to point to correct title; remember that all page titles on Wikipedia are case-sensitive. —Jeremy v^_^v Components:V S M 16:39, 13 October 2011 (UTC)
- Done Further note, I would ask that when PRODed articles are reviewed for deletion, one should at least make sure that the PRODer has provided a rationale. --Ron Ritzman (talk) 01:26, 14 October 2011 (UTC)
Kimberly J. Bowles
This person was a part of Significant Naval History, There is significant 3rd party validation that this person was a part of something significant, Tailhook was a huge Story in the News in the 90's the person was one of the women from the Tailhook Command. I question immediate deletion because the first time it was deleted it was self promotion, the article was fixed and re-submitted and it now the person is not significant. -Starpreneurgoddess (talk) 17:25, 13 October 2011 (UTC)
- Note: Of the speedy deletions this article has, the most recent deletion is a A7. Articles meeting this criterion are generally not undeleted either because they require a complete rewrite or they violate our biographical or fair-use policies. In addition, the other two deletions are a G11 and a (as far as I can tell, invalid) G4. —Jeremy v^_^v Components:V S M 19:41, 13 October 2011 (UTC)
- She has created the same article under the name Kimberly Jessy as well. The tone is so promotional, especially in the original version, that I suspect that the subject and Starpreneurgoddess may be one and the same. (I will concede, though, that Starpreneurgoddess has worked a bit on articles about other non-notable Hollywood newbies of the up-and-coming sort.) --Orange Mike | Talk 19:51, 13 October 2011 (UTC)
Sonny Eliot
Found this page had been deleted from wikipedia and can see no reason why. -68.42.64.35 (talk) 17:50, 13 October 2011 (UTC)
- Note: The deletion log right above the edit box when you click on the redlink indicates it's because it was PRODded and was not corrected or contested within a week. —Jeremy v^_^v Components:V S M 19:39, 13 October 2011 (UTC)
Sonita Lontoh
Permission received in OTRS ticket 2011101310018695 for release under CC-BY-SA-3.0 and GFDL the content added by the subject to her biography at http://www.newscertified.com/experts/Sonita-Lontoh -– Adrignola talk 19:40, 13 October 2011 (UTC)
Maple Batalia
This article was speedily deleted per criterion A7. Requesting userfication of this page to User:VQuakr/Maple Batalia for discussion and possible improvement. -VQuakr (talk) 00:02, 14 October 2011 (UTC)
Richie Nuzzolese
This was speedied as an A7. As a matter of fact, Richie's claim to fame is playing Steve Johnson in the music video for Katy Perry's "Last Friday Night" The article should be undeleted and edited to clarify his claim to fame. -Jeremy Jigglypuff Jones (talk) 07:42, 4 October 2011 (UTC)
- Not done - this article has not been restored because it does not appear to meet our guidelines for inclusion of articles concerning people. In general, Wikipedia considers a topic to be notable if there exist multiple reliable sources of information on the topic, external to the subject itself. Articles concerning people will be deleted on sight if they are considered to be unambiguous advertising or promotion, or if they do not contain a credible assertion of the significance of the subject.. One video appearance does not meet the definition of "notable" as per an encyclopedia (talk→ BWilkins ←track) 09:51, 4 October 2011 (UTC)
- From A7: "This is distinct from verifiability and reliability of sources, and is a lower standard than notability." Also: "The criterion does not apply to any article that makes any credible claim of significance or importance even if the claim is not supported by a reliable source or does not qualify on Wikipedia's notability guidelines.[5]" So the article was not speediable. Jeremy Jigglypuff Jones (talk) 06:44, 5 October 2011 (UTC)
- In the case of an unsourced or insufficietly-sourced BLP, admins will speedy under A7 due to our biogaphical policy. Out of respect to the biographical subjects we require all articles on living subjects to be strongly sourced. —Jeremy v^_^v Components:V S M 19:35, 7 October 2011 (UTC)
- Admins had best not, because there is no consensus support for that action and no basis for it either in speedy deletion or BLP policy. BLPPROD is the mechanism for dealing with unsourced biographies - not A7. Thparkth (talk) 10:28, 12 October 2011 (UTC)
- This is interesting. I haven't looked at REFUND much, but it looks like editors/admins make one person judgements on what is notable, and there you go. That's based on this entry. I could be wrong. - Peregrine Fisher (talk) 05:21, 15 October 2011 (UTC)
- Admins had best not, because there is no consensus support for that action and no basis for it either in speedy deletion or BLP policy. BLPPROD is the mechanism for dealing with unsourced biographies - not A7. Thparkth (talk) 10:28, 12 October 2011 (UTC)
- In the case of an unsourced or insufficietly-sourced BLP, admins will speedy under A7 due to our biogaphical policy. Out of respect to the biographical subjects we require all articles on living subjects to be strongly sourced. —Jeremy v^_^v Components:V S M 19:35, 7 October 2011 (UTC)
- From A7: "This is distinct from verifiability and reliability of sources, and is a lower standard than notability." Also: "The criterion does not apply to any article that makes any credible claim of significance or importance even if the claim is not supported by a reliable source or does not qualify on Wikipedia's notability guidelines.[5]" So the article was not speediable. Jeremy Jigglypuff Jones (talk) 06:44, 5 October 2011 (UTC)
Sensory Interventions for Preterm Infants
I was just starting to create this article for a class assignment and had only put the references up. I hadn't gotten a chance to add the substantive information before it was speedily deleted. I have all of the other material formatted and ready to upload. I just need the article "Sensory Interventions for Preterm Infants" to be undeleted so I can upload everything. Thank you. -Lalezars (talk) 20:18, 13 October 2011 (UTC)
- You're supposed to write the article first, in a sandbox such as User:Lalezars/Sensory interventions for preterm infants. Once your first draft is ready, you can ask for comment before moving it into main articlespace. --Orange Mike | Talk 20:37, 13 October 2011 (UTC)
- Not done as per above. Beware that this is not an WP:ESSAY, or original research (talk→ BWilkins ←track) 10:50, 14 October 2011 (UTC)
Flint (Author)
This Article has been deleted, without any warning. And the reason was because of putting the article Flintzel Diao (Flint's sister) that wasn't existed at all. Many articles already added offshoots with non-existing articles, but that article wasn't deleted. Please consider this request -DiaoDIao (talk) 10:19, 14 October 2011 (UTC)
- Not done - As announced at the top of the page, this process is only for articles that were deleted uncontroversially and has no applicability to articles deleted after any deletion discussion. Since the article you are here about was deleted at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Flint Diao (author), it cannot be undeleted through this process. Nevertheless, if you believe that the consensus found at the discussion was in error, or that significant new information has come to light since the deletion, you may contact the administrator who closed the discussion, user TParis (talk · contribs). After you do so, if your concerns are not addressed and you still seek undeletion, a request may be made at deletion review. Salvio Let's talk about it! 10:29, 14 October 2011 (UTC)
Marcel Hudima
reasoning -78.161.175.143 (talk) 19:49, 14 October 2011 (UTC)
- User:Jéské Couriano/REFUND/Page live/Draftified Note, also, that this article, when deleted, will be ineligible for refund as it was originally deleted via AfD (A G4 speedy can't be undeleted here because the article failed an AfD debate). You will need to go to WP:Deletion review to deal with this, not here. —Jeremy v^_^v Components:V S M 19:58, 14 October 2011 (UTC)
Brandon Biebel
This is a notable person. He is one of the best living skateboarders and needs a wikipedia page. There are plenty of sources, see http://biebelsworld.com/profile or http://girlskateboards.com/brandon_biebel.html . I would like to write this article. Please mark it for undeletion. Thanks, Amiznu -Amiznu (talk) 21:30, 14 October 2011 (UTC)
- Note: Of the speedy deletions this article has, the most recent deletion is a G1. Articles meeting this criterion are generally not undeleted either because they require a complete rewrite or they violate our biographical or fair-use policies. The remaining four deletions are a G3, two A7s, and a G7. Of those, none but the very first deletion (a G7) can be restored here as a rewrite would benefit the article better than gibberish, vandalism, or an attempt to make Wikipedia into MySpace. —Jeremy v^_^v Components:V S M 02:38, 15 October 2011 (UTC)
Catchfree
The article was deleted because it allegedly included "unambiguous advertising which only promotes a company, product, group, service or person". The page was not created to advertise, but to provide an unbiased view of the company, but I understand that a fellow Wiki user felt otherwise. I have read the Wikipedia:Notability (organizations and companies) section again and wish that the page in question be Userfied so the content can be improved upon prior to the re-insertion into the main space. -Casey Armstrong (talk) 00:56, 15 October 2011 (UTC)
- Done userfied at User:Casey Armstrong/Catchfree Skier Dude (talk) 04:06, 15 October 2011 (UTC)
Every PROD of an element of a notable fictional franchise (e.g., TV episodes) by User:Gh87
- The Summer Bummer · ( talk | logs | history | links | watch ) · [revisions]
- The Night Moves · ( talk | logs | history | links | watch ) · [revisions]
- The Avengers (The O.C.) · ( talk | logs | history | links | watch ) · [revisions]
- The Gringos · ( talk | logs | history | links | watch ) · [revisions]
- The Metamorphosis (The O.C.) · ( talk | logs | history | links | watch ) · [revisions]
- The Sleeping Beauty (The O.C.) · ( talk | logs | history | links | watch ) · [revisions]
- The Chrismukk-huh? · ( talk | logs | history | links | watch ) · [revisions]
- The Cold Turkey · ( talk | logs | history | links | watch ) · [revisions]
- The Earth Girls Are Easy · ( talk | logs | history | links | watch ) · [revisions]
See User talk:Gh87#Mass-contesting your PRODs. for the discussion, but I essentially mass-contest every PROD within this scope that this user has ever made. Per WP:ATD and WP:OUTCOMES I believe each should exist as a redirect to their show or to a season article. I simply don't have the time to clean up all of these--so if anyone else would care to, I would appreciate it. Note that I don't have any objection to anyone immediately turning these into appropriate redirects, and of course anyone is welcome to immediately file an AfD on anything so-contested. Jclemens (talk) 03:45, 15 October 2011 (UTC)
- To elaborate, Jclemens proposes recovery of previous revisions. Administrators, you can decide to whether or not fulfill this proposal. I have been the one PRODding The O.C. episodes of season 4; since the articles have been deleted, I rebirthed them to redirects to The O.C. (season 4). Here is the link to click. Check history logs as necessary. --Gh87 (talk) 08:23, 15 October 2011 (UTC)
- Why PROD, why not just redirect them from jumpstreet and handle any objections through WP:BRD? --Ron Ritzman (talk) 17:50, 15 October 2011 (UTC)
- I don't like future vandalisms, and I don't want more history logs. That's why I PRODded. --Gh87 (talk) 19:05, 15 October 2011 (UTC)
- I can sort of see the vandalism argument, but not the history log argument. What do you have against preserving the history? LadyofShalott 19:38, 15 October 2011 (UTC)
- That's a very good question. Perhaps he thinks that leaving the histories intact would make it too easy for "fanboys" to restore the articles. --Ron Ritzman (talk) 19:55, 15 October 2011 (UTC)
- I can sort of see the vandalism argument, but not the history log argument. What do you have against preserving the history? LadyofShalott 19:38, 15 October 2011 (UTC)
- I don't like future vandalisms, and I don't want more history logs. That's why I PRODded. --Gh87 (talk) 19:05, 15 October 2011 (UTC)
- Why PROD, why not just redirect them from jumpstreet and handle any objections through WP:BRD? --Ron Ritzman (talk) 17:50, 15 October 2011 (UTC)
- Done All histories and talk pages have been restored but the redirects have been left in place. --Ron Ritzman (talk) 00:56, 16 October 2011 (UTC)
Flint Diao (author)
Though the administrator that deleted the article has a reason to delete, but the article is actually verifiable. The article also tells the reliable source of Flint Diao's life. Look at its reference and to really prove you that the article is telling the whole truth. -DaNewAdmin (talk) 10:39, 15 October 2011 (UTC)
Bollywood_films_of_2012
the reason for deleting the article was "article about future events" but article was list of bollywood film to be released in 2012 with their release date. For that matter Bollywood_films_of_2011 also contains the list of films that is to be released in future i.e. Nov and Dec 2011 -Ashishsippy (talk) 16:43, 15 October 2011 (UTC)
- Done - as a contested proposed deletion, the article has been restored on request. Salvio Let's talk about it! 23:42, 15 October 2011 (UTC)
Alex Biega
faulty reason for deletion - not a recreation of article about a hockey player - deleted article was about a montreal lawyer -ExaltedQC (talk) 21:40, 15 October 2011 (UTC)
- Done but I've reopened the second AFD because it's about the current subject, not the hockey player.--Ron Ritzman (talk) 21:53, 15 October 2011 (UTC)
Jasmine de Kotwara Taylor
I, said person, would like to have my page undeleted as I believe I have a right, the same as my Uncle (Muzaffar Ali) and Aunt (Kenize Mourad) and cousin (Shaad Ali) to be listed on Wikipedia. I am from an Indian Royal Family and I am a singer/songwriter (amongst other things) in UK. I can provide evidence that I am who I say I am. Many Thanks. -Jsmnkhan (talk) 23:35, 15 October 2011 (UTC)
- Not done - this article has not been restored because it does not appear to meet our guidelines for inclusion of articles concerning people. In general, Wikipedia considers a topic to be notable if there exist multiple reliable sources of information on the topic, external to the subject itself. Articles concerning people will be deleted on sight if they are considered to be unambiguous advertising or promotion, or if they do not contain a credible assertion of the significance of the subject. Salvio Let's talk about it! 23:40, 15 October 2011 (UTC)
ckd galbraith
National company in Scotland, acts in many sectors, and significant press coverage. The article is new and should be given an opportunity to develop. -Hackbinary (talk) 18:21, 8 October 2011 (UTC)
Clerk note: of the two deletions, one is an R2 and the other a G11. I have modified the report to point to the correct page; remember that all titles on Wikipedia are case-sensitive. —Jeremy v^_^v Components:V S M 18:30, 8 October 2011 (UTC)
- With no comment on the deletion, despite an ongoing discussion with this user, they have attempted to forum shop across multiple admin's talk pages: [6], [7], [8]. I'm not amused. -FASTILY (TALK) 20:45, 8 October 2011 (UTC)
- There was no ongoing discussion with Fastily. He/she removed the CKD thread from their talk page. In the first instance, with the article being tagged speedy deletion by user DGG, then Fastily deleted it about 30 minutes later from how interpreted the logs. Then when I initially started querying the deletion, because I thought there should be time to contest the 'speedy deletion' I linked the original page back GMcQ's page, but not attempting to replace the content, so a proper discussion could take place. This was then responded to by Fastily delete GMcQ's user page. It seems to me that Fastily is very quick to act on articles to delete, but quite happy to take his/her time when responding when he/she is asked for assistance or an explanation. I regret if I have not followed all of Wikipedia the rules properly; in the first instance I asked Fastily for clarification, but was met with another round of deletes. In the second instance I was seeking further assistance an admin who marked the article in the first, and from someone who is more knowledgeable. The process for having a page restored is not exactly transparent (to a naive user). Finally, simply looking at the volume of what Fastily deletes, I would find that concerning in general. Hackbinary (talk) 22:57, 8 October 2011 (UTC)
- It seems that Fastily is to busy attending to other things. (It never seemed to me that there was an "ongoing discussion," but I thought I would give it a couple of days) Could another Admin attend to this issue? Hackbinary (talk) 23:42, 10 October 2011 (UTC)
- Could another administrator please attend to this issue. It seems that Fastily has lost all interest in this issue. Hackbinary (talk) 16:23, 16 October 2011 (UTC)
- Or perhaps I should repost the original content from the copy that I have? I trust that would be fine if nobody assists by, say next Friday, Oct 21, noon, UTC. Hackbinary (talk) 16:29, 16 October 2011 (UTC)
- Could another administrator please attend to this issue. It seems that Fastily has lost all interest in this issue. Hackbinary (talk) 16:23, 16 October 2011 (UTC)
- It seems that Fastily is to busy attending to other things. (It never seemed to me that there was an "ongoing discussion," but I thought I would give it a couple of days) Could another Admin attend to this issue? Hackbinary (talk) 23:42, 10 October 2011 (UTC)
- There was no ongoing discussion with Fastily. He/she removed the CKD thread from their talk page. In the first instance, with the article being tagged speedy deletion by user DGG, then Fastily deleted it about 30 minutes later from how interpreted the logs. Then when I initially started querying the deletion, because I thought there should be time to contest the 'speedy deletion' I linked the original page back GMcQ's page, but not attempting to replace the content, so a proper discussion could take place. This was then responded to by Fastily delete GMcQ's user page. It seems to me that Fastily is very quick to act on articles to delete, but quite happy to take his/her time when responding when he/she is asked for assistance or an explanation. I regret if I have not followed all of Wikipedia the rules properly; in the first instance I asked Fastily for clarification, but was met with another round of deletes. In the second instance I was seeking further assistance an admin who marked the article in the first, and from someone who is more knowledgeable. The process for having a page restored is not exactly transparent (to a naive user). Finally, simply looking at the volume of what Fastily deletes, I would find that concerning in general. Hackbinary (talk) 22:57, 8 October 2011 (UTC)
- With no comment on the deletion, despite an ongoing discussion with this user, they have attempted to forum shop across multiple admin's talk pages: [6], [7], [8]. I'm not amused. -FASTILY (TALK) 20:45, 8 October 2011 (UTC)
- Not done - this article has not been restored because it does not appear to meet our guidelines for inclusion of articles concerning companies. In general, Wikipedia considers a topic to be notable if there exist multiple reliable sources of information on the topic, external to the subject itself. Articles concerning companies will be deleted on sight if they are considered to be unambiguous advertising or promotion, or if they do not contain a credible assertion of the significance of the subject.. Reposting the original content will likely result in immediate deletion, and prevention of the article from being recreated (talk→ BWilkins ←track) 19:12, 16 October 2011 (UTC)
If criteria A7 (importance) and G11 (advertising) are the only reasons for deletion - i.e. not G12 (copyright) - the content can be reposted and edited outside of the article namespace until it's ready. It could be undeleted and moved to user or wikiproject namespace by an administrator, or another option is to use the article wizard, as a draft at first, then submit for review. Some coverage exists ([9][10][11][12][13][14]) - probably enough for notability. Peter E. James (talk) 20:55, 16 October 2011 (UTC)
HONOR POINT COUNT
speedy deletion message stated that a.context was missing (true) b. article was too short(not true). I asked for some minutes to fulfill the requested failures. I wrote the context and added around 20 lines to explain the concept of Playing Tricks (PT) and examples (which was missing), but didnt want to re-save the page without a permission. But when I went to ask for it, lost the unsaved text and the page has already been deleted. I was requested to ask here for undeletion. I need around 30 minutes to reconstruct everything. Thanks --John plaut (talk) 14:13, 17 October 2011 (UTC) -John plaut (talk) 14:13, 17 October 2011 (UTC)
Raw Deal: A Question of Consent (2001)
falsely deleted. This article was a properly cited and researched description of a Movie. This was not in any way unambiguous advertising for promotion. It simply stated what was already noted in various articles and reviews on the film. Please restore, and if there are certain criteria that needs change or improvement I will do so. Thank you. -Bankari (talk) 14:37, 17 October 2011 (UTC)
User:Jéské Couriano/REFUND/Ineligible speedy/G11
User:Jéské Couriano/REFUND/Ineligible speedy/G12
User:Jéské Couriano/REFUND/Ineligible speedy/G4
User:Jéské Couriano/REFUND/Ineligible speedy/U5
User:Jéské Couriano/REFUND/Ineligible speedy/G10
User:Jéské Couriano/REFUND/Ineligible speedy/G5 —Jeremy v^_^v Components:V S M 14:39, 17 October 2011 (UTC)
- Not done and will not be done This was properly deleted as hopelessly promotional and clearly meant to advertise the subject. --Orange Mike | Talk 16:56, 17 October 2011 (UTC)
this article was created by my friend, who is the author of the text -Gayaned (talk) 16:47, 17 October 2011 (UTC)
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User:EXtendiaIT
It says This page has been deleted. The deletion and move log for the page are provided below for reference. 13:47, 6 October 2011 Sphilbrick (talk | contribs) deleted "User:EXtendiaIT" (G12: Unambiguous copyright infringement of http://extendiait.com/about-extendiait/)
However the text on http://extendiait.com/about-extendiait is also created by my friend who works at eXtendiaIT. Could you please undelete the page, and/or provide hints if anything in the text needs to be revised.
thanks
User:Jéské Couriano/REFUND/Ineligible speedy/G11
User:Jéské Couriano/REFUND/Ineligible speedy/G12
User:Jéské Couriano/REFUND/Ineligible speedy/G4
User:Jéské Couriano/REFUND/Ineligible speedy/U5
User:Jéské Couriano/REFUND/Ineligible speedy/G10
User:Jéské Couriano/REFUND/Ineligible speedy/G5. I've also fixed the report to point at the correct title. —Jeremy v^_^v Components:V S M 17:05, 17 October 2011 (UTC)
Thank you for explanation. Also want to know if the user EXtendiaIT has also been deleted? Or he can still log in to make a new article. thanks
- They are blocked for a username violation, when indeed they should also be blocked for WP:COI and WP:SPAM. Someone associated with a company/product should never try to write an encyclopedia article about the company they work for, due to COI. If they create a new name, and come back and try to create the same article, they may find themselves blocked again. (talk→ BWilkins ←track) 17:54, 17 October 2011 (UTC)
Thank you for explaining. They were not aware of the COI policy. Then better to delete their account completely, rather than leaving this page here - http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User:EXtendiaIT.
Possible?
Thanks
- Userid's cannot be deleted...see WP:VANISH. Take care!
- Not done Editor appears to understand WP:PROMO and WP:COI (talk→ BWilkins ←track) 18:26, 17 October 2011 (UTC)
Obviously he didn't understand that, otherwise he wouldn't even tried to get explanations, and provide explanations. All the online resources have their rules, and sometimes, being first working with those resources, mistakes are made. Obviously the infringements were non-intentional. In some resources people can create accounts, create profiles, etc. He assumed this to be a profile. However, it's obviously a violation.
Anyway, on behalf of him I'd like to apologize for inconveniences caused.