Wikipedia:Templates for discussion/Log/2010 February 21

< February 20	February 22 >

February 21

Template:Atherstone Town F.C.

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was Delete Plastikspork _―Œ^(talk) 20:31, 28 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Atherstone Town F.C. (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

This template contains only six links, one of which is red, and three of which link to different sections of the same page. The remaining two links are to pages that are currently subject to deletion discussions. The subject of this navbox is an English football club that has never played at a level that would confer notability on its players by WP:FOOTY's standards. – Pee Jay 13:26, 21 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Delete - the articles which were under debate now redirect to the main club article, so this template now only links to one article. Definitely not needed -- ChrisTheDude (talk) 08:49, 22 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Template:Latin-C

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was Delete Plastikspork _―Œ^(talk) 20:31, 28 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Latin-C (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Delete. This template is redundant to a better-designed, better-implemented Template:Overseas Chinese. Ruodyssey (talk) 09:11, 21 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Delete per nom. Hong Qi Gong (Talk - Contribs) 13:50, 23 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Delete - seems pretty non-controversial.--Danaman5 (talk) 06:14, 26 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Template:Lowe's Senior CLASS Award - Softball

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was Delete Plastikspork _―Œ^(talk) 20:31, 28 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Lowe's Senior CLASS Award - Softball (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Completely non notable. Appears to be an attempt to avoid a prod tag on a non-notable article y making it a templateMontanabw^(talk) 07:49, 21 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Delete. Not enough links to make a useful navbox, and the award itself is of dubious importance. --RL0919 (talk) 15:48, 28 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Template:Distinguish2

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was Keep. RL0919 (talk) 15:45, 28 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Distinguish2 (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

{{distinguish}} does everything this does and more, and on top of that, less clumsily.174.3.98.236 (talk) 05:30, 21 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Keep it does nothing of the sort, it functions completely differently. {{distinguish}} only takes a link name as a parameter, {{distinguish2}} can be used to to format what you want to present, such as in a piped link. 70.29.210.242 (talk) 08:19, 21 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Comment from your talk page, I see that you are systematically replacing some dab templates, and people have complained to you about that. Why are you so intent all these deletions that you are doing these days? 70.29.210.242 (talk) 08:23, 21 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Obvious Keep As 70.29.210.242 explains, they work differently. --Cybercobra (talk) 10:24, 21 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Keep, nominator appears to be mistaken. older ≠ wiser 13:19, 21 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Keep, useful template independantly of {{distinguish}}. Kolindigo (talk) 19:33, 21 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Template:California County Route BUT

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was Delete Plastikspork _―Œ^(talk) 20:31, 28 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Template:California County Route BUT (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

A navbox for two items, the first of which doesn't exist. Rs chen 7754 21:45, 21 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Delete - Template no longer needed due to consolidation of items to a list. --LJ (talk) 00:32, 22 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Delete - Per above. ---Dough 48 72 01:44, 22 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Delete — no longer needed. Imzadi1979 (talk) 02:22, 22 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Template:California County Route AMA

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was Delete Plastikspork _―Œ^(talk) 20:31, 28 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Template:California County Route AMA (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

All items redirect to California County Routes in zone E. Rs chen 7754 21:45, 21 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Delete - Single item nav template. Template no longer needed due to consolidation of item to a list. --LJ (talk) 00:32, 22 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Delete - Per above. ---Dough 48 72 01:44, 22 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Delete — no longer needed. Imzadi1979 (talk) 02:22, 22 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Template:California County Route ED

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was Delete Plastikspork _―Œ^(talk) 20:31, 28 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Template:California County Route ED (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

All items redirect to California County Routes in zone E. Rs chen 7754 21:44, 21 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Delete - Single item nav template. Template no longer needed due to consolidation of item to a list. --LJ (talk) 00:32, 22 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Delete - Per above. ---Dough 48 72 01:44, 22 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Delete — no longer needed. Imzadi1979 (talk) 02:22, 22 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Template:California County Route SCC

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was Delete Plastikspork _―Œ^(talk) 20:31, 28 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Template:California County Route SCC (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

All items redirect to California County Routes in zone G. Rs chen 7754 21:44, 21 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Delete - Template no longer needed due to consolidation of items to a list. --LJ (talk) 00:32, 22 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Delete - Per above. ---Dough 48 72 01:44, 22 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Delete — no longer needed. Imzadi1979 (talk) 02:22, 22 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Template:California County Route YOL

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was Delete Plastikspork _―Œ^(talk) 20:31, 28 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Template:California County Route YOL (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

All items redirect to California County Routes in zone E. Rs chen 7754 21:44, 21 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Delete - Template no longer needed due to consolidation of items to a list. --LJ (talk) 00:32, 22 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Delete - Per above. ---Dough 48 72 01:44, 22 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Delete — no longer needed. Imzadi1979 (talk) 02:22, 22 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Template:California County Route SOL

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was Delete Plastikspork _―Œ^(talk) 20:31, 28 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Template:California County Route SOL (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

All items redirect to California County Routes in zone E. Rs chen 7754 21:44, 21 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Delete - Single item nav template. Template no longer needed due to consolidation of item to a list. --LJ (talk) 00:32, 22 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Delete - Per above. ---Dough 48 72 01:44, 22 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Delete — no longer needed. Imzadi1979 (talk) 02:22, 22 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Template:California County Route SCR

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was Delete Plastikspork _―Œ^(talk) 20:31, 28 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Template:California County Route SCR (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

All items redirect to California County Routes in zone G. Rs chen 7754 21:44, 21 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Delete - Single item nav template. Template no longer needed due to consolidation of item to a list. --LJ (talk) 00:32, 22 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Delete - Per above. ---Dough 48 72 01:44, 22 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Delete — no longer needed. Imzadi1979 (talk) 02:22, 22 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.