Wikipedia:Templates for discussion/Log/2016 July 17

July 17

edit
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was Delete; deleted by Nyttend (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT 09:09, 2 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Defunct conference shouldn't be linked anymore and therefore not useful for navigation. UCO2009bluejay (talk) 22:02, 17 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The author has been notified. Corkythehornetfan 22:51, 17 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]
It has been discussed here Wikipedia talk:WikiProject College football/Archive 17#Defunct conferences.UCO2009bluejay (talk) 00:44, 21 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. ~ Rob13Talk 02:04, 25 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

No longer used in any articles. Was previously used in Green Bay Packers and List of Green Bay Packers retired numbers. I have redesigned List of Green Bay Packers retired numbers to a more standard tabular format and replaced the template in Green Bay Packers with the actual template content. Also, somewhat of a duplicate of {{Packers retired numbers}}. « Gonzo fan2007 (talk) @ 16:12, 17 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete, but feel free to recreate it if more articles are written. Plastikspork ―Œ(talk) 23:24, 2 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Less than four links. No useful navigation. ~ Rob13Talk 05:42, 17 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete, but feel free to recreate it if more articles are written. Plastikspork ―Œ(talk) 23:24, 2 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Less than four links. No useful navigation. ~ Rob13Talk 05:41, 17 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was deletePlastikspork ―Œ(talk) 23:28, 2 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Conference is no longer in existence. Therefore, this navbox is no longer needed. All schools have joined another conference or are independent. Corkythehornetfan 03:53, 17 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).