Wikipedia

Wikipedia:Templates for discussion/Log/2018 June 22

< Wikipedia:Templates for discussion | Log
< June 21 June 23 >

June 22

edit

Module:Infobox diplomatic dispute

edit
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was Delete; deleted as G7 by RHaworth (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 14:30, 25 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

The template that this was presumably intended to be used on, Template:Infobox diplomatic dispute, was deleted. {{3x|p}}ery (talk) 20:46, 22 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Module:Infobox college coach/convert

edit
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. No opposition. Primefac (talk) 00:14, 30 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Input deprecated format is no longer used anywhere, therefore useless {{3x|p}}ery (talk) 20:44, 22 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:Camarines Sur labelled map

edit
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. Primefac (talk) 00:14, 30 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Unused, and useless now that File:Map of Cam. sur per Districts.png has been deleted. Redrose64 🌹 (talk) 19:45, 22 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:Happy! ratings

edit
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was Delete; deleted by RHaworth (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 19:13, 26 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

excessive per prior discussion Frietjes (talk) 18:10, 22 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

As far as I can tell, looking at the creator's contributions, they are just creating these templates in the template-space and not even adding them to articles, meaning that they are only spamming the creation of these templates. -- AlexTW 12:57, 23 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete all But please don't forget : {{Scandal ratings}} or {{The Walking Dead ratings}} oh ! and {{Game of Thrones ratings}}, enjoy ! ;) — Preceding unsigned comment added by DownFame (talk • contribs)
@DownFame: Do you admit to deliberately spamming the template namespace? -- AlexTW 15:31, 24 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]
@AlexTheWhovian:Do you admit Mr.AlexTheWhovian to simply favoring the shows that interest you ? To say with your pretty words that this "has no interest" but in this case, delete ALL the templates because really, really IT BOTHERS ME ! Oh my God ! I am committing a crime ! Every time I make a template I bring sources (so this one do not come from nowhere like magic !) Then the ratings have a meaning, may not be for you, but guess what, YOU ARE NOT THE CENTER OF THE WORLD! In spite of all your competences and your contributions on Wikipedia, stop believing that the pages belong to you and that everything must be created according to your good will. Because why Games of Thrones would have the right to his template ? And not the others? Do you want to know why I did not publish them on the pages and leave them? Because I knew that a guy like you who has nothing else to do with his days would take them off as soon as he sees them. Honestly what you do is so stupid, that I do not even understand why I write to you, because in the end my dear Alex you have what you wish because WITH YOUR "HUGE" success on wikipedia you delete everything that you do not like. So good luck, but know one thing, your behavior makes me laugh a lot.
With all my respect DownFame.
— Preceding unsigned comment added by DownFame (talk • contribs)
As can be seen, the creating editor has no intent to discuss this civilly, and they admit to creating them simply to spam. (Do you want to know why I did not publish them on the pages and leave them?), which is very clearly WP:NOTHERE. -- AlexTW 01:52, 25 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]
As can be seen, the creating editor has no intent to discuss and take into consideration what I said : all my templates I created are provided with sources. So are not useless, and very interesting to know where are the show in the world of series, I encourage you to delete The Walking Dead template for example ... We'll see if all the fans will be happy with your action ! So if you just want to post them on the pages no problem, I do it. But stop saying that this "SPAM" ! It's not something that appears on your screen suddenly, it proves that you are looking for information and that you are intersted by that, right ? Then instead of wanting to delete and find that pointless, contributed to that and make it useful ! Because sometimes before you want to delete everything for no reason you have to know how to look behind your shoulder to see if it interferes with people and not just ourselves. I've talked about myself to people who love series a lot and they will often see Wikipedia audiences to see if it's worth watching this or that series. So will you continue to say that they are "spam", or develop why you do not like it (ratings templates) ?— Preceding unsigned comment added by DownFame (talk • contribs) —Preceding undated comment added 12:12, 25 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Wikipedia audiences don't know of the template namespace. You created them, you had no intention to implement them. Hence, spam.-- AlexTW 12:27, 25 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]
As I said above I had intention to implement them (so that it does not remain "spam"...) but the question is, will you let me ?— Preceding unsigned comment added by DownFame (talk • contribs) —Preceding undated comment added 12:12, 25 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]
It's not whether I'll "let you", it's more of a question on you knowing that the consensus here is to delete them, and yet you're creating more. Are you deliberately being disruptive now? You can be reported and blocked for that. And why aren't you signing your posts properly, and copying unsigned tags from your previous posts? -- AlexTW 08:16, 26 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]
"The consensus here is to delete them" let me laugh ! Why not have integrated the series The 100, iZombie (and I repeat myself again), The Walking Dead and Fear The Walking Dead, Games of Thrones and more ! Who all have ratings !!! And I'm not "disruptive" I defend my idea and the principle that the ratings are very useful on Wikipedia and have their places, so go (and I repeat myself again!) remove ratings Games Of Thrones have seen the number of people who will be satisfied..."You can be reported and blocked for that." is it a threat? Honestly if you are happy do it, but without problem I would be for the integration of templates with their sources on Wikipedia. And why I aren't signing MY posts properly, and copying unsigned tags from my previous posts, it's because I do not have all the experience you have my dear Alex (only for ratings)...— Preceding unsigned comment added by DownFame (talk • contribs) —Preceding undated comment added 12:12, 25 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Do you see a single keep vote? No? All delete votes? Clearly you didn't see my nomination for the main template to be deleted either. You're being disruptive by creating more while they're being nominated for deletion. I've already told you how to sign your posts. As you can see: deliberately disruptive. Keep trying to be clever. -- AlexTW 10:03, 26 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Who is the disrupter? The one that removes the graphics on the pages that I just integrated as he wanted so well, while he complains that it's "spam" if it is not integrated, or the one who tries to go from the Wikipedia front, to fill the pages intelligently with sources? I think my dear Alex that the one who is disruptive is not me (despite my ignorance for the signature, excuse me ...) but the one that prevents to make sure to develop Wikipedia and which remains in a Wikipedia of the 2000s without ever thinking about the future -- DownFame 14:14, 26 June 2018 (UTC)
Now you're copying my signature because you're a tiny bit grumpy at me. Aww. I see you don't want to discuss at all. As can be seen, absolutely nobody agrees with you or your view. Cheerio, kiddo. -- AlexTW 15:51, 26 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Actually, technically we could speedy delete these under WP:CSD#G7 per comment by author above. --woodensuperman 14:18, 26 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:Tfd2

edit
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was relisted on 2018 July 1. Primefac (talk) 02:49, 1 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:Netflix original films

edit
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. If similar instances of this template are recreated in the future, G4 would most certainly apply. Primefac (talk) 00:12, 30 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Per a previous discussion, this has been recreated under a slightly different name. Lugnuts Fire Walk with Me 08:49, 22 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:Coroner of Kings County, New York

edit
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. Primefac (talk) 00:10, 30 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Has only one blue link and the only page it is used at is Coroner of New York City which already has a complete list within the article. Rusf10 (talk) 01:23, 22 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).
Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:Templates_for_discussion/Log/2018_June_22&oldid=1073153500"