Wikipedia:Templates for discussion/Log/2020 November 15

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was merge to Template:Space colonization. Izno (talk) 03:39, 16 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Propose merging Template:Space colonization with Template:Space Colonization.
Overlapping and interchanging sidebars. Soumya-8974 talk contribs subpages 17:03, 6 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, ProcrastinatingReader (talk) 21:30, 15 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was relisted on 2020 November 27. Primefac (talk) 01:36, 27 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was soft delete. Based on minimal participation, this uncontroversial nomination is treated as an expired PROD (a.k.a. "soft deletion"). Editors can request the template's undeletion. Primefac (talk) 01:38, 27 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This template, which has a broken link, should be deleted and all instances replaced with {{Gray's Anatomy link}}, to which the template is redundant (both have the same purpose) Tom (LT) (talk) 03:37, 15 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. As the other templates were not explicitly included in this discussion, they were not deleted. Primefac (talk) 01:35, 27 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Not actually used in article space, the functionality can be replaced using normal methods (eg a citation or external link). This will actually make editing easier as currently the intended use: "MedlinePlus2|000141" is even less meaningful than "https://medlineplus.gov/ency/article/<<article number>>.htm"

Additionally there are another four medline templates currently in use: "Template:MedlinePlusDrugInfo Template:MedlinePlusEncyclopedia Template:MedlinePlusImage Template:MedlinePlusOverview" Tom (LT) (talk) 03:19, 15 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. (non-admin closure) ProcrastinatingReader (talk) 09:08, 22 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Unused for its stated purpose and, more importantly, redundant to Category:WikiProject peer reviews which is much more up to date Tom (LT) (talk) 01:36, 15 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).