Wikipedia:Templates for discussion/Log/2021 January 5
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).
The result of the discussion was no consensus. Plastikspork ―Œ(talk) 16:31, 13 January 2021 (UTC)
- Template:Hounshell1984 (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)
This template, which is transcluded 58 times, contains a single citation. As far as I can tell it does not take any parameters or offer any other functionality. It seems to me that it is not an improvement on including the reference in full in articles in which it is used, except for being slightly shorter. I know relatively little about template policy and praxis, but it seems to me that it falls foul of the first point in WP:TG – that guideline does not seem to me to envisage templates being used in this way. I think that it should be "subst"ed in the articles in which it is used and then deleted. Wham2001 (talk) 22:55, 5 January 2021 (UTC)
- Keep. This is a specific-source template, created to make the reuse of this source easier and more consistent from article to article. See Category:Specific-source templates. – Jonesey95 (talk) 14:52, 10 January 2021 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).
The result of the discussion was keep. Plastikspork ―Œ(talk) 16:32, 13 January 2021 (UTC)
Procedural nomination. Soft delete from Wikipedia:Templates_for_discussion/Log/2020_December_27#Template:All-rounder's_Test_triple by Störm contested. ProcrastinatingReader (talk) 22:19, 5 January 2021 (UTC)
- The original rationale was for failing WP:NAVBOX #4. ProcrastinatingReader (talk) 11:07, 7 January 2021 (UTC)
- Keep. The "all-rounder's triple" is a real thing.[1][2][3] StAnselm (talk) 22:51, 6 January 2021 (UTC)
- Keep it's a real thing (even if it's called a triple despite only having two criteria), and has a sufficiently succinct inclusion criteria. Joseph2302 (talk) 16:09, 8 January 2021 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).
The result of the discussion was relisted on 2021 January 17. (non-admin closure) ProcrastinatingReader (talk) 11:09, 17 January 2021 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).
The result of the discussion was relisted on 2021 January 14. (non-admin closure) ProcrastinatingReader (talk) 21:49, 14 January 2021 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).
The result of the discussion was Delete; deleted by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 02:02, 13 January 2021 (UTC)
- Template:TGLAM/Members (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)
Unused abandoned template. Izno (talk) 05:28, 5 January 2021 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).