Wikipedia:Templates for discussion/Log/2022 September 12

< September 11	September 13 >

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. ✗plicit 23:46, 19 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Template:CFB Last Meeting (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

This template is used to make tables for the "game summaries" sections of college football team season articles that detail the previous winner and overall series record between the two teams. Per discussion at Wikipedia talk:WikiProject College football/Archive 24#Overall record / Last meeting / Result tables, a consensus was reached that such tables—typically rendered without a template—were unnecessary cruft. Since this content is not needed, this template should be deleted. Jweiss11 (talk) 20:41, 12 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Delete per linked discussion. PCN02WPS (talk | contribs) 03:09, 13 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per nom. Cbl62 (talk) 05:02, 14 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:Hasidic dynasties/stub

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. ✗plicit 23:36, 19 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Hasidic dynasties/stub (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Note that this is not a "-stub" tagging template. This appears to be a subst-only template for creating new Hasidic dynasty pages, but I believe that given its very bare-bones nature, it has outlived its usefulness. There are no links to this template from any project pages, so it is unlikely that it is being used. Editors would be much better served by adapting one of the many developed articles listed at {{Hasidic dynasties by country of ancestral origin}}. – Jonesey95 (talk) 17:41, 12 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Delete per nomination. --WikiCleanerMan (talk) 15:46, 16 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:Coelomate basic

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. ✗plicit 23:37, 19 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Coelomate basic (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Single-use template containing article content. Subst and delete. – Jonesey95 (talk) 17:12, 12 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Delete Subst per nomination. --WikiCleanerMan (talk) 13:15, 19 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:Bierstadt Lake

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. ✗plicit 23:39, 19 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Bierstadt Lake (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Single-use template containing article content. This table was initially written in HTML markup, which was a bit daunting. I have rewritten it using normal wikitable code, and it should be fine to subst and delete now. – Jonesey95 (talk) 17:09, 12 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

That sounds lovely!–CaroleHenson (talk) 18:18, 12 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:Klein model history

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. ✗plicit 23:41, 19 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Klein model history (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Single-use template containing only article content and no template parameters. Subst and delete. – Jonesey95 (talk) 17:00, 12 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Delete Subst per nomination. --WikiCleanerMan (talk) 15:46, 16 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:Civil disobedience

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. ✗plicit 23:42, 19 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Civil disobedience (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

This template seems to have no use, as everything inside of it is a redlink. Explodicator7331 (talk) 15:24, 12 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Delete per nomination. --WikiCleanerMan (talk) 15:46, 16 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:FCC LMS letter

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was relisted on 2022 September 21. Primefac (talk) 11:05, 21 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Template:FCC_LMS_letter (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:Wl

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was userfy for now to User:DMacks/Template:Wl; if and when it reaches a usable level, it should have a name that indicates its functionality. Primefac (talk) 11:10, 21 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Wl (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

No transclusions, documentation, or categories. Inscrutable template name. – Jonesey95 (talk) 19:11, 4 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This is pursuant to Wikipedia:Village_pump_(technical)/Archive_198#Wikilinks_from_italic_titles (I agree it's hard to find that one signal among the 'what links here' noise!). It's development of a functionality that there seems to be agreement is still needed (also discussed at Module talk:Plain text#Keeping contents of <sup>/<sub>). But no objection if it should be moved out of main template-space into my userspace. Noting for others that this is not the same {{wl}} was deleted pursuant to Wikipedia:Templates_for_discussion/Log/2019_July_27#Template:WelcomeLong. DMacks (talk) 19:56, 4 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, ✗plicit 11:58, 12 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

At a minimum rename, probably at a maximum delete as unused. Moving is fine. --Izno (talk) 01:25, 17 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]
move to userspace or rename. Frietjes (talk) 23:34, 19 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:Tldp

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. ✗plicit 03:32, 19 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Tldp (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

No transclusions. – Jonesey95 (talk) 19:07, 4 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

There are 142 potential uses. That isn't a huge number, but it's reasonable. No idea why there are currently zero (other than fifteen years of bitrot). Chris Cunningham (user:thumperward) (talk) 19:47, 4 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, ✗plicit 11:57, 12 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Delete as unused. --Izno (talk) 01:26, 17 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:PlusLiga Seasons

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. ✗plicit 12:11, 19 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Template:PlusLiga Seasons (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

The template which includes PlusLiga seasons: Template:Polish Men's Volleyball League already exists, next to the PlusLiga teams. Maister1921 (talk) 07:49, 12 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Delete per nomination. --WikiCleanerMan (talk) 13:58, 17 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:12TeamBracket-ExtraSemi

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. ✗plicit 12:07, 19 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Template:12TeamBracket-ExtraSemi (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Redundant to {{12TeamBracket-LateBye}}. – Pbrks ^(t • c) 04:31, 12 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Delete per nomination. –Aidan721 (talk) 18:22, 12 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:12TeamBracket-2Elim-A

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. ✗plicit 03:31, 19 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Template:12TeamBracket-2Elim-A (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

No transclusions. –Aidan721 (talk) 01:46, 12 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Delete per nom. – Pbrks ^(t • c) 05:35, 12 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:12TeamRoundRobin

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. ✗plicit 03:31, 19 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Template:12TeamRoundRobin (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

No transclusions. –Aidan721 (talk) 01:06, 12 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Delete per nom. – Pbrks ^(t • c) 05:35, 12 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).