Wikipedia:Templates for discussion/Log/2024 August 18

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more templates or modules. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. plicit 23:46, 25 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Single-use content template. Izno (talk) 22:50, 18 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template or module's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more templates or modules. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. plicit 23:43, 25 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I orphaned Minkuotang (a single link) while processing the result of Wikipedia:Templates for discussion/Log/2024 July 29#Taiwan political party templates. The others I found shortly after. I think they should be deleted for the same reason. Izno (talk) 22:39, 18 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template or module's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more templates or modules. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was speedy delete. WP:CSD#G7. Complex/Rational 05:58, 23 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I understand the appeal of this template, but I think that for child protection reasons it's best that people under the age of 18 do not advertise such a status to unvetted strangers on the internet. There have been issues in the past with such templates, for obvious reasons. – Isochrone (talk) 23:21, 18 August 2024 (UTC+1) – Isochrone (talk) 22:23, 18 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Alright. I knew it was best to be deleted. Bennett1203 (talk) 23:03, 18 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
@Bennett1203, as the only substantiative contributor you can nominate it for deletion under WP:G7. If you have Twinkle, it can do this automatically for you. I can do it for you, if you want. – Isochrone (talk) 08:20, 19 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
You are free to delete it with Twinkle. It is okay! Bennett1203 (talk) 21:44, 19 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Strong Delete per nomination. There have been cases in the past where such stuff was oversighted. I have personally requested oversight in at least one such case of a person declaring that he/she was a minor and said how old they were. 🌀 Hurricane Clyde 🌀 (talk) 03:07, 23 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
So yes; I think it should be deleted. 🌀 Hurricane Clyde 🌀 (talk) 03:10, 23 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
And @Bennett1203, I added your speedy deletion notice for you. 🌀 Hurricane Clyde 🌀 (talk) 03:13, 23 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template or module's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more templates or modules. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. Izno (talk) 20:13, 25 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Navbox with just one blue link. Not useful for navigation. – Jonesey95 (talk) 17:54, 18 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template or module's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more templates or modules. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. Izno (talk) 20:12, 25 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

All red links; can be created later when the articles are ready Sportsfan 1234 (talk) 17:05, 18 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template or module's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more templates or modules. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. Izno (talk) 15:22, 21 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Propose merging Template:WikiProject IDP with Template:WikiProject British Library.
Wikipedia:GLAM/British Library/IDP is a sub-group of the British Library page. Gonnym (talk) 11:20, 11 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

@Gonnym I think this one might be easiest as substitute and delete rather than merge? I think from memory it was only used to identify pages from a particular editing event. Andrew Gray (talk) 18:49, 15 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Having the block of code of Template:WikiProject IDP in 29 articles isn't really a good option. Gonnym (talk) 07:50, 17 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Izno (talk) 16:01, 18 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template or module's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more templates or modules. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. Izno (talk) 15:22, 21 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Wikipedia:WikiProject Molecular Biology/Genetics/Gene Wiki is a task force of WikiProject Molecular Biology. Usages should be replaced with {{WikiProject Molecular Biology|Gene Wiki=yes}}. Gonnym (talk) 11:15, 11 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Izno (talk) 16:00, 18 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template or module's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more templates or modules. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. plicit 14:33, 25 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Just two transclusions of this navbox, no main article, and two links in the body. Also redundant to {{Kazuhiko Yamaguchi}}. – Jonesey95 (talk) 14:08, 18 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template or module's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more templates or modules. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. plicit 14:32, 25 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Navbox with no main article, one transclusion, and just one blue link that links to an article about a Culver City neighborhood. Created in 2007; if the articles haven't been created yet, they may never be created. Until they are, this navbox is not useful. – Jonesey95 (talk) 02:01, 18 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template or module's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.