Wikipedia:Templates for discussion/Log/2024 October 7
- Template:Diplomatic missions of Grenada (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)
- Template:Diplomatic missions of Uzbekistan (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)
- Template:Diplomatic missions of Cambodia (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)
- Template:Diplomatic missions of Botswana (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)
Pointless to have a nav box with only 2 English entries. LibStar (talk) 22:27, 7 October 2024 (UTC)
- Template:WikiProject Hazara (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)
- Template:WPHazara-award (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)
- Template:WPHazara-invite (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)
Project was deleted. Gonnym (talk) 19:49, 7 October 2024 (UTC)
Unused banner-looking navbox. Gonnym (talk) 08:43, 30 September 2024 (UTC)
- Delete per nomination. --WikiCleanerMan (talk) 00:51, 3 October 2024 (UTC)
- Keep This is a tutorial and help template for new users or those who don't understand Wikipedia in its entirety. Why is this being considered for deletion? ~Oshwah~(talk) (contribs) 19:44, 6 October 2024 (UTC)
- Looks like I removed the template from the WP:AUTOPAT page 4 months ago with the edit summary
remove "are you in the right place?" box. it contains a lot of info, and doesn't seem related to autopatrol. i would be surprised if folks with those questions ended up on this page
. This caused the template to have no transclusions, and templates that aren't in use are routinely nominated for deletion by folks that watch those reports. Looks like you re-added the template to WP:AUTOPAT upon being notified of this TFD, which makes things a little more complicated. –Novem Linguae (talk) 15:59, 7 October 2024 (UTC)- If the template is now in-use I have no other issue with it. However, if it is removed again, please re-nominate it. Gonnym (talk) 19:22, 7 October 2024 (UTC)
- Looks like I removed the template from the WP:AUTOPAT page 4 months ago with the edit summary
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, ✗plicit 14:17, 7 October 2024 (UTC)
- Delete. I agree that this is useless. Nobody is going to end up at Wikipedia:Autopatrolled looking for general newbie help. Even if it was useful, it's only ever been used on one page so there's no reason for it to be a template. – Joe (talk) 20:15, 7 October 2024 (UTC)
Nomen dubium of the most dubium kind - a hypothetical creature that Linnaeus considered responsible for a skin inflammation he experienced [1]. Might actually be worth an article, but no basis for placement in any taxonomic system, and certainly not in our taxonomic template system. Same applies to {{Taxonomy/Furia infernalis}}. --Elmidae (talk · contribs) 11:07, 7 October 2024 (UTC)
- Not used anywhere so just replace with [[Category:Unnecessary taxonomy templates]]. YorkshireExpat (talk) 15:05, 7 October 2024 (UTC)
- Is that how we deal with those? Fair enough. --Elmidae (talk · contribs) 16:40, 7 October 2024 (UTC)
- Is moving to draft space an option? That give the author time to write an article about the species. The Banner talk 01:39, 8 October 2024 (UTC)
- That's beside the point, actually. We don't have taxonomic templates about hypothetical or non-existant animals in our system, which is why we can't have one about this taxon. For the same reason such an article could not have a taxobox (and thus no link to the template system anyway). --Elmidae (talk · contribs) 05:26, 8 October 2024 (UTC)
- Template:Stavesacre (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)
Other albums listed here were redirected years ago. This navbox no longer offers additional navigation that already doesn't exist in the articles that remain. StarcheerspeaksnewslostwarsTalk to me 02:59, 7 October 2024 (UTC)