Wikipedia:Templates for discussion/Log/2024 September 11

Navbox with one blue link in the body. DB1729talk 21:37, 11 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Delete as unhelpful for navigation, but without prejudice against re-creation if/when there are more articles for the template to connect. jlwoodwa (talk) 00:43, 12 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

These serve no useful purpose from what I can see, and the 2024 European Parliament elections are already all linked via {{European Parliament elections}}. I am not aware of any other templates linking all elections by year for a continent (probably as not many other people see a benefit in doing so). Number 57 20:12, 11 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned template that calls itself (Template-loop). —GoldRingChip 17:22, 11 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Template that contains two redirects and one link to a non-resident mission. Unhelpful for navigation. AusLondonder (talk) 17:19, 11 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Template marked as deprecated since 2009. Subst the two talk page usages and delete template. Gonnym (talk) 15:55, 11 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Unused WikiProject banner. All usages have previously been converted to parent banner. Gonnym (talk) 15:52, 11 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Propose merging Template:Advert with Template:Promotional tone.
{{Advert}} is rarely used on articles that actually read like adverts; what is most often (indeed, almost exclusively) meant is what is described by {{Promotional tone}} (aka {{Promo}}), which has a better name and better wording ("This article contains text that is written in a promotional tone." vs. "This article contains content that is written like an advertisement.". The use of {{Advert}} is thus often a cause of confusion among novice editors whose work is tagged with it. We certainly don't need two such templates. i also note that the category used by {{Advert}} is Category:Articles with a promotional tone; that {{Advert inline}} redirects to {{Promotion inline}}; and that {{Promotion}} redirects to {{Advert}}. I propose to redirect {{Advert}} to {{Promotional tone}}, and to have tools such as Twinkle updated accordingly. Andy Mabbett (Pigsonthewing); Talk to Andy; Andy's edits 09:05, 4 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Probably what needs to happen is that {{advert}} needs to be page moved to the preferable title, not redirected, as the longer-standing template serving this function. Izno (talk) 05:31, 11 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]
That won't address the sub-optimal wording (which is apparently the reason why {{Promo}} was forked in the first place). Andy Mabbett (Pigsonthewing); Talk to Andy; Andy's edits 15:29, 14 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, plicit 14:10, 11 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Subpage containing text marked as a failed proposal from 2008. I was unable to find any talk pages with a proposal-related discussion linking to this page. – Jonesey95 (talk) 12:12, 11 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

No transclusions, even in the set of example pages that have been preserved at Template:GeoTemplate. It appears to have gone out of use sometime in the past ten or fifteen years. Nearly all edits since then have been maintenance edits, vandalism, or reverting vandalism. – Jonesey95 (talk) 12:11, 11 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Unused subpage, marked as deprecated since 2009. The other subpages have been kept as examples, which is fine, but this one went out of use 15 years ago and is not needed. – Jonesey95 (talk) 12:04, 11 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more templates or modules. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was Delete for multiple reasons:

AnomieBOT 12:19, 16 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Unused subpages. Possibly an abandoned experiment. – Jonesey95 (talk) 05:30, 11 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template or module's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

No transclusions. Wikipedia is not a sports reference database. We don't need these sorts of standings until the end of the season, if ever. – Jonesey95 (talk) 05:29, 11 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed article content created in 2007 but not currently used in any articles. It appears to have been proposed for use in an article but was disputed. It was used in an article way back in 2007 when it was created, but it was removed a few months later. It is now in use only in the original talk page proposal section, and in two archived versions of Race and genetics stored in the user space of a now-deceased editor. Subst into the three places where it is used. – Jonesey95 (talk) 04:59, 4 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Izno (talk) 05:27, 11 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

No transclusions. It appears that there is an explicit or implicit consensus to limit these "List of sovereign states in ..." articles to decades or a longer time frame (see {{Lists of political entities by century}}), so there is no need for this per-year navigational template. – Jonesey95 (talk) 05:20, 11 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Apparent article content with no transclusions, documentation, template parameters, or incoming links. – Jonesey95 (talk) 05:04, 11 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Apparent article content with no documentation, categories, transclusions, template parameters, or incoming links. – Jonesey95 (talk) 05:03, 11 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Delete, has been made redundant by @Redacted II --HLFan (talk) 11:18, 12 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]
DELETE, as it led to listing prototypes in multiple sections Redacted II (talk) 13:23, 12 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]
The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more templates or modules. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was Delete; deleted as G7 by Izno (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT 04:05, 12 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

No transclusions, documentation, template parameters, categories, or incoming links. – Jonesey95 (talk) 05:02, 11 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template or module's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Navbox with no transclusions and no main article. – Jonesey95 (talk) 05:01, 11 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

No transclusions, documentation, or incoming links for this sidebar template. – Jonesey95 (talk) 05:01, 11 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

No transclusions. Created in July 2024. – Jonesey95 (talk) 05:00, 11 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Standings template with no transclusions, template parameters, or documentation. – Jonesey95 (talk) 04:58, 11 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more templates or modules. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was Delete; deleted as G7 by Izno (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT 07:07, 11 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Subpage in template space with no transclusions, no template parameters, no parent page, and no documentation. It looks like a Wikipedia-space page, but I don't know where it should be moved to. – Jonesey95 (talk) 04:57, 11 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Delete – I created this for copy-and-paste text so that new entry pages can be created quickly each year. It's probably unnecessary as a full-fledged template; I've made Wikipedia:The Core Contest/Preparations/Entries text now instead. Aza24 (talk) 05:18, 11 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]
The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template or module's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Navbox with no transclusions and no main article. – Jonesey95 (talk) 04:55, 11 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

@Jonesey95: Articles are created. Can you withdraw this? Mwiqdoh (talk) 19:04, 13 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]
There is still no main article. See WP:NAVBOX, item 4. – Jonesey95 (talk) 20:30, 13 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]
@Jonesey95: It's created now. Thanks Mwiqdoh (talk) 06:34, 16 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Navbox with no transclusions or main article. – Jonesey95 (talk) 04:51, 11 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

No transclusions, documentation, categories, template parameters, or incoming links. – Jonesey95 (talk) 04:51, 11 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Navbox with no transclusions or main article. – Jonesey95 (talk) 04:49, 11 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

No transclusions, documentation, or incoming links for this sidebar template. – Jonesey95 (talk) 04:48, 11 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

No transclusions, documentation, or incoming links for this sidebar template. – Jonesey95 (talk) 04:42, 11 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

No transclusions, template parameters, documentation, or incoming links. – Jonesey95 (talk) 03:56, 11 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

@Jonesey95 er, the template clearly does have documentation Mach61 03:57, 11 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]
My mistake. This template appears to be redundant to {{delink}}. – Jonesey95 (talk) 04:47, 11 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]
@Jonesey95 Not quite true; the template removes disambiguators as well, hence "ambiguate" Mach61 04:57, 11 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

No transclusions, documentation, categories, or incoming links. – Jonesey95 (talk) 03:53, 11 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

No transclusions, documentation, categories, or incoming links. – Jonesey95 (talk) 03:53, 11 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

No transclusions. Navbox with only one link in the body. – Jonesey95 (talk) 03:52, 11 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

No transclusions. Navbox with only two links in the body. – Jonesey95 (talk) 03:52, 11 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Can probably be merged into a decade one as Category:Rail transport accident templates has a lot of templates with 1-3 links (see Template:1862 railway accidents). Gonnym (talk) 08:10, 11 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]
The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more templates or modules. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was Moved without redirect to User:Snowmanonahoe/Dark mode switch with comment "G7/[[Wikipedia:Templates_for_discussion/Log/2024_September_11#Template:Dark_mode_switch]]" by Izno (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT 23:03, 13 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

No transclusions, documentation, categories, or incoming links. – Jonesey95 (talk) 03:51, 11 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Userfy. Incomplete, might work on it at some point later. Snowmanonahoe (talk · contribs · typos) 16:56, 11 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]
The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template or module's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

No trancslusions, template parameters, documentation, or incoming links from relevant discussions. There are two previous TFDs, but those appear to have been for licensing template, not this unexplained transportation template. – Jonesey95 (talk) 02:08, 11 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Delete. I've previously subst the few transclusions directly, as a wrapper of wrapper of a module is excessive. There are a few more in this set which are unused. Gonnym (talk) 08:08, 11 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]