Wikipedia talk:Userboxes/Arts/Cinema
This project page does not require a rating on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||
|
More Dark Knight
editCould anyone make more Dark Knight userboxes? Maybe with the Joker and Two-Face? --CommanderWiki35 (talk) 00:42, 17 October 2008 (UTC)
New boxes
editI have created simple boxes for Alfred Hitchcock and Buster Keaton; they are on the new boxes page as well as my own page. --Wspencer11 (talk to me...) 17:55, 15 August 2006 (UTC)
Man-eating talking plant template
editThe {{user LSOH}} template was not created in reference to the musical. If you want to create something specific to the 1986 musical, do so. But do not categorize my template as a reference to the musical, which it is not. Just look at the image in the template -- it's from the 1960 original, not the 1986 musical. (Ibaranoff24 04:40, 17 August 2006 (UTC))
Repo Man/Harry Dean Stanton
editREPO MAN | This user thinks the Rodriguez brothers are Goddamn Dipshit Gypsy Dildo Punks. |
thought this would be funny, didn't see one involving repo man, so i'll put it on. Anyone have a problem, just remove it.
suggestion
editfilm noir please ! Rohmerin 10:58, 15 June 2007 (UTC)
Question involving image
editI have a design for a box concerning the film Titanic, however, I have not been able to find a suitable image. I have created one from a screenshot of the film, however, I was wondering whether or not it would conflict with Wikipedia's Free-Use policy if I uploaded it. The resolution is 64x64 pixels. The Good Ol' Country Doctor 19:15, 19 June 2007 (UTC)
Never mind. Did some research, found a better non-rule-violating way. Sorry for the distraction. The Good Ol' Country Doctor 20:41, 19 June 2007 (UTC)
Organisation
editI've done a fair bit of work improving the organisation of the list of specific films, as it was a bit of a mess with most of the films in a big long list while the Sci Fi section had more detail and a couple of individual films had sub-sections to themselves.
I've moved boxes to the correct genre heading, then created a few new genre headings. I named the original list 'general' so it would indent in line with the other categories. I then added sub-headings to each genre for any film with 3 or more boxes on the page (regardless of the 'notabillity' of the film). this seemed the most sensible criteria. However, I didn't go back and remove headings from existing films with less than three boxes.
With regards how I categorised films by genre, I just checked the linked wiki page for each and read what it said. If you disagree, please feel free to re-categorise as you see fit. Some are hard to pin down, e.g. should Jaws be in horror?
I've tried to put things in alphabetical order where I can, but haven't done all the sections. When I have some time I'll try and come back to that.--ThePaintedOne (talk) 22:52, 2 June 2008 (UTC)
Dances With Wolves
editI think we need some DWW ones. I would make some, but I just joined today, and I don't know how to make them. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Arilicious (talk • contribs) 22:31, 9 February 2010 (UTC)