Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Media/Archive 3
![]() | This is an archive of past discussions. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page. |
Archive 1 | Archive 2 | Archive 3 |
R U Professional - featured article candidate
I've nominated the article about the song "R U Professional" for Featured Article consideration.
It's a satirical song and a form of parody music using sampling.
Comments would be appreciated, at Wikipedia:Featured article candidates/R U Professional/archive1.
Thank you for your time,
Nomination of The Last Voyage of the Starship Enterprise for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article The Last Voyage of the Starship Enterprise is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.
The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/The Last Voyage of the Starship Enterprise until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. — Cirt (talk) 09:51, 8 October 2015 (UTC)
Nomination of The Land of Gorch for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article The Land of Gorch is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.
The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/The Land of Gorch until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. — Cirt (talk) 09:59, 11 October 2015 (UTC)
I want you to join
I started discussion topics in two articles, but no one is coming.
- Talk:Public broadcasting#Time for separate article for the situation in the USA: New, separate main article about public broadcasting in the U.S.
- Talk:Television advertisement/Archives/2017#After the break: Commercial break is being redirect to television advertisement, but it also happens on radio. What should we do with ad breaks?
Celebrity articles with no image
I'm looking for celebrity articles with no image. The more famous the better. I am trying to find artists to create portraits of notable individuals where a photo has thus far been unavailable. If you know of such articles that get big page hits, please let me know.
Many thanks,
Cleared the entire GA Review backlog for Media and drama
- Thank you all to all our editors who help to contribute to Quality improvement efforts on Wikipedia related to WP:WPMEDIA.
- I've helped to clear the entire GA Review backlog for Media and drama, which can be seen at Wikipedia:Good article nominations/Topic lists/Media and drama.
- I'd like to make a suggestion, here, which is optional, for you to please consider:
- Suggestion: This suggestion is optional only, but I ask you to please at least read over the Good Article review instructions, and consider reviewing two to three (2-3) GA candidates from good articles nominations, for each one (1) that you nominate. Again, this is optional and a suggestion only, but please do familiarize yourself at least with how to review, and then think about it.
Thank you,
Not in Front of the Children - at Peer Review
I've requested Peer Review for Not in Front of the Children.
Feedback would be appreciated, at Wikipedia:Peer review/Not in Front of the Children/archive1.
Thank you,
From The Doctor to my son Thomas - featured article candidate
I've nominated the article about the video From The Doctor to my son Thomas for Featured Article consideration.
The article is about a message sent from actor Peter Capaldi in-character in his role as the Doctor on Doctor Who, to console an autistic young boy over grief from the death of his grandmother.
Comments would be appreciated, at Wikipedia:Featured article candidates/From The Doctor to my son Thomas/archive1.
Thank you for your time,
Deletion to Quality Award
I've created the WP:Deletion to Quality Award.
This recognizes editors who've taken a page previously considered for deletion — to Featured Article or Good Article quality.
The award is inspired by the Wikipedia:Million Award, the Wikipedia:Article Rescue Squadron, and the Wikipedia:WikiProject Quality Article Improvement.
Please see Wikipedia:Deletion to Quality Award.
Thank you,
charley pride
is an american country singer--206.176.117.215 (talk) 19:35, 4 November 2015 (UTC)
Lauren Conrad//Celebs Involved in Fashion
Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I am working on Lauren Conrad's wiki page for a project, primarily with a focus on her recent charity work and clothing line (Paper Crown). Please check the talk page for Conrad's wiki, as I have proposed changes there.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Talk:Lauren_Conrad
If you feel I should add/delete any information or have other suggestions, please let me know. Advice is always welcome!
Sdowd14 (talk) 16:42, 6 November 2015 (UTC)sdowd14
One of your project's articles has been selected for improvement!
Hello, |
Created article on satirical comedy film - Climate Change Denial Disorder
I've created a new article on the satirical comedy short film Climate Change Denial Disorder.
Help with additional research would be appreciated on the article's talk page, at Talk:Climate Change Denial Disorder.
Thank you,
Help with Uproxx?
Hi, I'm posting to see if any editors here would be interested in reviewing a new draft I proposed for the Uproxx article. The entry suffers from incomplete and unencyclopedic content and also needs better sourcing. I tried to address all these things in my draft and would love any feedback about how I did.
You can find my draft and notes on the Talk page here. I was paid to research and write the draft for Uproxx as part of my work at Beutler Ink, so I won't make direct edits myself. Instead, I'm hoping other editors will make changes if they feel what I've proposed is an improvement over the current article. Thanks! Heatherer (talk) 01:48, 15 January 2016 (UTC)
"Cinema"
The usage of "cinema" is under discussion, see talk:movie theater -- 70.51.44.60 (talk) 05:51, 20 January 2016 (UTC)
notice of proposal to merge "O Benfica" and "Mística" into "S.L. Benfica#Media"
There's a proposal to merge O Benfica and Mística into S.L._Benfica#Media which may be of this wikiproject interest. It's listed at WP:PAM and in need of third party appreciation. Please provide input at Talk:S.L. Benfica#Merger proposal.--Threeohsix (talk) 21:01, 21 January 2016 (UTC)
Please help populate Category:Censored media
Please help populate this new category. Thanks! PS. If you'd like to discuss this category, I suggest doing so at Talk:Censorship#New_related_category:_Category:Censored_media. --Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| reply here 04:22, 25 February 2016 (UTC)
The Last Voyage of the Starship Enterprise for peer review
I've listed The Last Voyage of the Starship Enterprise for peer review.
Comments would be appreciated, at Wikipedia:Peer review/The Last Voyage of the Starship Enterprise/archive1.
Thank you for your time,
Pack Journalism - Started Research
Hi everyone! My name is Marissa and I'm a student from St. Francis College in Brooklyn, NY who is working on editing Wikipedia content. I chose to work on the page for Pack Journalism because I feel it needs a lot of work and has a lot of potential. I'm just starting to conduct my research and make changes to the page, so feel free to reach out to me and let me know any suggestions you might have for me in the editing process. I look forward to hearing back and working on this Wikipedia page to bring it to its full potential. Mpaganelli (talk) 15:38, 3 October 2016 (UTC)
Update: Sources for "Pack Journalism" Article.
1. Global Media Journal - "Unethical Consequences of Pack Journalism" http://www.globalmediajournal.com/open-access/unethical-consequences-of-pack-journalism.pdf
2. "Rethinking the pack journalism mentality" - Article
3. "The Boys on the Bus": Pack Journalism at Unsafe Speeds - Washington Post Article http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/articles/A37323-2004Aug26.html
4. An Examination of Pack Journalism as a Form of Groupthink: A Theoretical and Qualitative Analysis
5. Encyclopedia of Journalism - Section on 'Bandwagon Journalism' https://books.google.com/books?id=ZQhDq8fPj2IC&pg=PA156&lpg=PA156&dq=pack+journalism+positives&source=bl&ots=2FChhKUg7l&sig=1PwsbIURLnZ3rAC99SN1HTvpRE8&hl=en&sa=X&ved=0ahUKEwjE8c_mvsnPAhVEjz4KHStqD6IQ6AEILzAB#v=onepage&q=pack%20journalism%20positives&f=false — Preceding unsigned comment added by Mpaganelli (talk • contribs) 20:14, 7 October 2016 (UTC)
Feel free to take a look at any of these sources and let me know what you think! Mpaganelli (talk) 20:21, 7 October 2016 (UTC)
- Mpaganelli - These sources look great! Would you be able to re-post the link to "The Boys on the Bus" article. The one you posted doesn't seem to work. Looking forward to seeing what you add to the article! Best, Prof.bgreg (talk) 20:25, 12 October 2016 (UTC)
Take a look at my sandbox page to see a continuous rough draft of the research and compilation of information for this article! Here's the link: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User:Mpaganelli/sandbox — Preceding unsigned comment added by Mpaganelli (talk • contribs) 03:56, 17 October 2016 (UTC)
2016 Community Wishlist Survey Proposal to Revive Popular Pages
Greetings WikiProject Media/Archive 3 Members!
This is a one-time-only message to inform you about a technical proposal to revive your Popular Pages list in the 2016 Community Wishlist Survey that I think you may be interested in reviewing and perhaps even voting for:
If the above proposal gets in the Top 10 based on the votes, there is a high likelihood of this bot being restored so your project will again see monthly updates of popular pages.
Further, there are over 260 proposals in all to review and vote for, across many aspects of wikis.
Thank you for your consideration. Please note that voting for proposals continues through December 12, 2016.
Best regards, Stevietheman — Delivered: 18:03, 7 December 2016 (UTC)
Opinions are needed on the following matter: Talk:Research on the effects of violence in mass media#Latest edits. Permalink here. Flyer22 Reborn (talk) 15:14, 4 January 2017 (UTC)
Missing topics list
My list of missing topics about media is updated - Skysmith (talk) 14:11, 8 January 2017 (UTC)
MEMRI
Hello.
Last month, I put forward a plan to begin improving the Middle East Media Research Institute page. I'd like members of this community to review and discuss my first set of recommendations for the "Projects" section here.
I work for the organization and have been tasked with representing it on Wikipedia so I know that I am not to make any of the changes myself. Thank you. R at MEMRI (talk) 18:30, 10 January 2017 (UTC)
Upcoming "420 collaboration"
You are invited to participate in the upcoming which is being held from Saturday, April 15 to Sunday, April 30, and especially on April 20, 2017!The purpose of the collaboration, which is being organized by WikiProject Cannabis, is to create and improve cannabis-related content at Wikipedia and other Wikimedia projects in a variety of fields, including: culture, health, hemp, history, medicine, politics, and religion. WikiProject Media participants may be particularly interested in the following category: Category:Cannabis media. For more information about this campaign, and to learn how you can help improve Wikipedia, please visit the "420 collaboration" page. |
---|
RfC on the WP:ANDOR guideline
Hi, all. Opinions are needed on the following: Wikipedia talk:Manual of Style#RfC: Should the WP:ANDOR guideline be softened to begin with "Avoid unless" wording or similar?. A WP:Permalink for it is here. Flyer22 Reborn (talk) 22:53, 17 April 2017 (UTC)
Requesting assessment
I request a re-assessment of Dhammakaya Media Channel, which has been expanded on.--Farang Rak Tham (talk) 23:37, 18 April 2017 (UTC)
Citation overkill proposal at WP:Citation overkill talk page
Opinions are needed on the following: Wikipedia talk:Citation overkill#Citations. A permalink for it is here. Flyer22 Reborn (talk) 06:48, 9 May 2017 (UTC)
Popular pages report
We – Community Tech – are happy to announce that the Popular pages bot is back up-and-running (after a one year hiatus)! You're receiving this message because your WikiProject or task force is signed up to receive the popular pages report. Every month, Community Tech bot will post at Wikipedia:WikiProject Media/Archive 3/Popular pages with a list of the most-viewed pages over the previous month that are within the scope of WikiProject Media.
We've made some enhancements to the original report. Here's what's new:
- The pageview data includes both desktop and mobile data.
- The report will include a link to the pageviews tool for each article, to dig deeper into any surprises or anomalies.
- The report will include the total pageviews for the entire project (including redirects).
We're grateful to Mr.Z-man for his original Mr.Z-bot, and we wish his bot a happy robot retirement. Just as before, we hope the popular pages reports will aid you in understanding the reach of WikiProject Media, and what articles may be deserving of more attention. If you have any questions or concerns please contact us at m:User talk:Community Tech bot.
Warm regards, the Community Tech Team 17:15, 17 May 2017 (UTC)
How to describe the Emmett Till case in the lead sentence of the Emmett Till article
Opinions are needed on the following matter: Talk:Emmett Till#RfC: Should we include the "accused of showing an interest in a white woman" aspect in the lead or specifically the lead sentence?. A WP:Permalink for it is here. Flyer22 Reborn (talk) 16:43, 24 May 2017 (UTC)
Seeking input on Woven Digital name change and update
Hello! I'm reaching out here to see if members of this WikiProject would be able to look at some updates for the digital media company, Uproxx Media Group (formerly Woven Digital), who own brands such as Uproxx and BroBible. On behalf of the company, I have written an updated draft seeking to improve the current article and in my edit request, I've also proposed moving the article to the company's current name, Uproxx Media Group. As I do have a conflict of interest, I'm seeking uninvolved editors to review the proposed draft and weigh in on the name change suggestion. Are there are any folks here who can help? Thanks in advance. 16912 Rhiannon (Talk · COI) 17:06, 7 June 2017 (UTC)
Opinions are needed on the following matter: Wikipedia talk:Citation overkill#Should this essay be changed to encourage more citations?. A WP:Permalink for it is here. Flyer22 Reborn (talk) 01:40, 9 June 2017 (UTC)
Nomination of Tony Chang for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Tony Chang is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.
The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Tony Chang until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Sagecandor (talk) 17:49, 27 June 2017 (UTC)
RfC regarding the WP:Lead guideline -- the first sentence
Opinions are needed on the following matter: Wikipedia talk:Manual of Style/Lead section#Request for comment on parenthetical information in first sentence. A WP:Permalink for it is here. Flyer22 Reborn (talk) 05:16, 2 July 2017 (UTC)
Nomination of Elijah Daniel for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Elijah Daniel is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.
The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Elijah Daniel (2nd nomination) until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Sagecandor (talk) 04:21, 18 July 2017 (UTC)
Request for Comment - Introduction to Whataboutism
There is an ongoing Request for Comment about the introduction to the article Whataboutism.
You may comment if you wish, at Talk:Whataboutism#RfC:_Introduction_to_the_subject. Sagecandor (talk) 17:24, 21 July 2017 (UTC)
RfC: Red links in infoboxes
Opinions are needed on the following matter: Wikipedia talk:Manual of Style/Infoboxes#RfC: Red links in infoboxes. A WP:Permalink for it is here. Flyer22 Reborn (talk) 13:28, 24 July 2017 (UTC)
Edit request for Uproxx Media Group
Hi, I previously posted here looking for editors who might want to review a new draft for Uproxx Media Group and was able to find an editor to assist with that review. Since the article was updated, a new in-depth media piece was published about the digital media company. I've posted a short edit request asking about adding that new source to the article. Would anyone be able to help? Thanks! 16912 Rhiannon (Talk · COI) 16:21, 27 July 2017 (UTC)
I'm considering putting this article through WP:GAN, but before I do so I'd appreciate it if a media specialist would take a good hard look at the article to see if there are any major gaps or issues that need to be addressed before GAN. Roger (Dodger67) (talk) 07:59, 10 August 2017 (UTC)
I have started a draft for the web media company Digiday, on the theory that news sources frequently referenced by Wikipedia should themselves have articles. We have several hundred articles that reference Digiday, and the source is quoted by many other media sources such as CNN,[1], [2] and Fox News.[3], [4] Can someone knowledgeable in the field see what can be done with this? bd2412 T 14:58, 15 September 2017 (UTC)
RfC: Should the WP:TALK guideline discourage interleaving?
Opinions are needed on the following matter: Wikipedia talk:Talk page guidelines#RfC: Should the guideline discourage interleaving? #2. A permalink for it is here. Flyer22 Reborn (talk) 19:37, 19 September 2017 (UTC)
Ideology of Drudge Report
You are invited to participate in the RfC at Talk:Drudge Report#RfC: Should the article say that Drudge Report has been described as far-right?. (I am not watching this page, so please ping me if you want my attention.) --Dr. Fleischman (talk) 19:24, 7 November 2017 (UTC)
Disambiguation links on pages tagged by this wikiproject
Wikipedia has many thousands of wikilinks which point to disambiguation pages. It would be useful to readers if these links directed them to the specific pages of interest, rather than making them search through a list. Members of WikiProject Disambiguation have been working on this and the total number is now below 20,000 for the first time. Some of these links require specialist knowledge of the topics concerned and therefore it would be great if you could help in your area of expertise.
A list of the relevant links on pages which fall within the remit of this wikiproject can be found at http://69.142.160.183/~dispenser/cgi-bin/topic_points.py?banner=WikiProject_Media
Please take a few minutes to help make these more useful to our readers.— Rod talk 17:04, 3 December 2017 (UTC)
Edit-warring over infobox: newspaper vs. website
A user is edit-warring in an article about a news website trying to put Infobox newspaper instead of website. See: Talk:The Times of Israel#RfC on infobox. --Triggerhippie4 (talk) 21:45, 1 January 2018 (UTC)
- I reverted Triggerhippie4's changes back to a long standing version of the article, which uses the "newspaper" template for "online newspaper". Triggerhippie4 reverted the revert several times, but neither of us has violated the 3-revert rule (or 1-revert rule per WP:ARBPIAINTRO). There is now a RfC on this issue [5]. OtterAM (talk) 00:45, 2 January 2018 (UTC)
LGBT-related media
I have started a discussion at Category talk:LGBT-related media, concerning categorization. Your input would be appreciated. Oornery (talk) 03:24, 6 February 2018 (UTC)
Reliability of TheBlaze
Editors here are invited to participate in WP:RSN#TheBlaze. (I am not watching this page, so please ping me if you want my attention.) --Dr. Fleischman (talk) 16:56, 6 March 2018 (UTC)
RfC notification
There is an RfC at the Sean Hannity article talk page members of this project might interested in taking part in here. -- ψλ ● ✉ ✓ 17:18, 22 April 2018 (UTC)
Requesting help to review proposed improvements to the Vox Media article
Hello, WikiProject Media! On behalf of Vox Media (the company that operates Vox (website), SB Nation and Polygon, among other sites), I am hoping to make some improvements to the company's Wikipedia article. I'm starting with a request here to remove a handful of problematic sources and change the infobox from "Template:Infobox website" to "Template:Infobox company", since Vox Media itself is not a website.
I will have additional improvements later, but for now, I'm seeking a volunteer to help with this initial request. Is a project member able to take a look at the suggested improvements and update the article accordingly? Thanks in advance. Inkian Jason (talk) 23:33, 19 April 2018 (UTC)
- The edit request has been answered, so I've marked this section as resolved. Inkian Jason (talk) 15:55, 23 April 2018 (UTC)
WikiProject collaboration notice from the Portals WikiProject
The reason I am contacting you is because there are one or more portals that fall under this subject, and the Portals WikiProject is currently undertaking a major drive to automate portals that may affect them.
Portals are being redesigned.
The new design features are being applied to existing portals.
At present, we are gearing up for a maintenance pass of portals in which the introduction section will be upgraded to no longer need a subpage. In place of static copied and pasted excerpts will be self-updating excerpts displayed through selective transclusion, using the template {{Transclude lead excerpt}}.
The discussion about this can be found here.
Maintainers of specific portals are encouraged to sign up as project members here, noting the portals they maintain, so that those portals are skipped by the maintenance pass. Currently, we are interested in upgrading neglected and abandoned portals. There will be opportunity for maintained portals to opt-in later, or the portal maintainers can handle upgrading (the portals they maintain) personally at any time.
Background
On April 8th, 2018, an RfC ("Request for comment") proposal was made to eliminate all portals and the portal namespace. On April 17th, the Portals WikiProject was rebooted to handle the revitalization of the portal system. On May 12th, the RfC was closed with the result to keep portals, by a margin of about 2 to 1 in favor of keeping portals.
Since the reboot, the Portals WikiProject has been busy building tools and components to upgrade portals.
So far, 84 editors have joined.
If you would like to keep abreast of what is happening with portals, see the newsletter archive.
If you have any questions about what is happening with portals or the Portals WikiProject, please post them on the WikiProject's talk page.
Thank you. — The Transhumanist 10:59, 31 May 2018 (UTC)
Draft articles for David Kramer and Jay Sures
Hello! I work for Executive Writing, and as part of my consultancy work, I've drafted new Wikipedia articles for David Kramer (talent agent) and Jay Sures, who serve as co-presidents of United Talent Agency. Both articles are currently in poor shape, and on their respective talk pages (Talk:David Kramer (talent agent) and Talk:Jay Sures) I've provided further detail about the problems with each. You can view my proposed drafts at User:EWChristine/David Kramer (talent agent) and User:EWChristine/Jay Sures. I realize these two biographies are tangentially related to Media, but I've posted a similar request at WikiProject Biography, and I've still not received any response. Are any WikiProject Film members willing to review the drafts and replace the existing articles? I believe I've disclosed my conflict of interest appropriately, but please let me know if not. Thank you in advance for any help. EWChristine (talk) 15:21, 24 July 2018 (UTC)
Members of this group may like to examine these recent edits to this article, to determine if they are appropriate for the article's subject matter, and do not violate any of Wikipedia's editing policies. Beyond My Ken (talk) 22:25, 5 August 2018 (UTC)
QUANTEL
Information about this company are wrong, QUANTEL now LUMIBIRD was found in 1970 by George BRET, product was ruby and Nd:Yag Laser.46.235.21.200 (talk) 15:36, 27 August 2018 (UTC)
Requested article: The MUTE Series
Hi there
Just wanted to politely alert you to a requested article about "The MUTE Series" :-) https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:New_user_landing_page&page=The+MUTE+Series
It's a web series so I figured that "media" was the most suitable WikiProject to post on.
Disclosure: I have a conflict of interest in that I am the creator of The MUTE Series. But I have 11 external links so I do believe it is notable.
Let me know if you need any other info.
Many thanks!
Andy — Preceding unsigned comment added by Andy Lambert 18 (talk • contribs) 16:06, 19 September 2018 (UTC)
HELP WANTED
For a number of years we have been experiencing a steady decline in the number of administrators as a result of attrition and a declining number of editors willing to consider adminship. Things have reached a point where we are starting to experience chronic backlogs in important areas of the project including noticeboards, requests for closure, SPI, CSD & etc. If you are an experienced editor with around two years (or more) of tenure, 10k edits give or take and no record of seriously disruptive behavior, please consider if you might be willing to help out the community by becoming an administrator. The community can only function as well as we all are willing to participate. If you are interested start by reading WP:MOP and WP:RFAADVICE. Then go to WP:ORCP and open a discussion. Over the next few days experienced editors will take a look at your record and let you know what they think your chances are of passing RfA (the three most terrifying letters on Wikipedia) as well as provide you with feedback on areas that might be of concern and how to prepare yourself. You can find a list of experienced editors who may be willing to nominate you here. Finally, I may not have this page on my watchlist, so if you want to reply to me directly please ping me. Thank you and happy editing... -Ad Orientem (talk) 21:47, 31 October 2018 (UTC)
Proposed Update for David Kramer
Hello. I work for Executive Writing, and as part of my consultancy work, I've drafted an update for the article of David Kramer, who serves as co-president of United Talent Agency. You can view my proposed edit at User:EWChristine/David Kramer (talent agent). I believe I've disclosed my conflict of interest appropriately. Thank you in advance for any help. EWChristine (talk) 18:52, 19 November 2018 (UTC)
Request for comments on List of Photographers
You are invited to join the discussion regarding edits to List of Photographers. The discussion is addressing the following questions:
- Within each section, should the entries by sorted alphabetically or chronologically?
- Should date of birth and date of death be added to entries?
- Should nationality, date of birth, and date of death information be supported using reliable sources if that information is in the entry's corresponding article?
- Is the Photographers' Identity Catalog (PIC) a reliable source for nationality, date of birth, and date of death?
- If a source is deemed reliable, should there be a limit on how many times it is used?
Your contributions are welcome. Thank you! Qono (talk) 14:57, 23 March 2019 (UTC)
A new newsletter directory is out!
A new Newsletter directory has been created to replace the old, out-of-date one. If your WikiProject and its taskforces have newsletters (even inactive ones), or if you know of a missing newsletter (including from sister projects like WikiSpecies), please include it in the directory! The template can be a bit tricky, so if you need help, just post the newsletter on the template's talk page and someone will add it for you.
- – Sent on behalf of Headbomb. 03:11, 11 April 2019 (UTC)
RT (formerly Russia Today)
Hello. You are invited to participate in two related RfCs: Talk:5G#RfC:Russian disinformation and Talk:RT (TV network)#RfC:Propaganda. R2 (bleep) 18:29, 31 May 2019 (UTC)
Request for information on WP1.0 web tool
Hello and greetings from the maintainers of the WP 1.0 Bot! As you may or may not know, we are currently involved in an overhaul of the bot, in order to make it more modern and maintainable. As part of this process, we will be rewriting the web tool that is part of the project. You might have noticed this tool if you click through the links on the project assessment summary tables.
We'd like to collect information on how the current tool is used by....you! How do you yourself and the other maintainers of your project use the web tool? Which of its features do you need? How frequently do you use these features? And what features is the tool missing that would be useful to you? We have collected all of these questions at this Google form where you can leave your response. Walkerma (talk) 04:24, 27 October 2019 (UTC)
One of your project's articles has been selected for improvement!
Hello, |
Would some members of this WikiProject mind taking a look this article? It underwent a major expansion recently and lots of the content seems too detailed and perhaps a bit WP:UNDUE. There are various formatting and syntax errors as well as well as quite a bit of WP:Namechecking, but it's the overall tone and excessive amount of sections (some which seem redundant (like "Prestige" and "Awards") or not really warranting such detail (like "Website redesign") that makes the article (at least in my opinion) a bit promotional in nature. Someone obviously put some time into expanding the article, but perhaps they tried to add too much. -- Marchjuly (talk) 15:29, 15 May 2020 (UTC)
WP:Articles for Creation has a new sort tool, you can see all pending relevant drafts here: Wikipedia:AfC sorting/Culture/Media
Just in case there are folks here who might be interested in reviewing drafts awaiting article status that are particular to this WikiProject. MatthewVanitas (talk) 21:16, 27 May 2020 (UTC)
(Extra-)low-voltage wiring, from more than a technical perspective
Mentioning it here since it involves things home theater cabling information (and where to put it). — SMcCandlish ☏ ¢ 😼 03:49, 4 August 2020 (UTC)
Chronology categories for the arts
Please see Wikipedia:Categories for discussion/Log/2020 September 15#The arts, where I have proposed standardising the naming of by-year, by-decade and by-centuries for the arts.
Currently the by-century categories are named "in the arts", but the by-decade and by-year categories are named "in arts". I have proposed two options for a common format: either "in the arts" or "in arts". --BrownHairedGirl (talk) • (contribs) 18:43, 15 September 2020 (UTC)
I came across this article via WP:THQ#Another question to the teahouse. I did some very basic cleanup, but I'm not sure what else can be done to WP:OVERCOME the many issue it has and avoid deletion, but perhaps someone from this WikiProject has some suggestions. -- Marchjuly (talk) 07:50, 6 January 2021 (UTC)
Requests for MasterClass article
Hello! My name is Alyssa and I work for the online streaming platform MasterClass. I've disclosed this on my profile and at Talk:MasterClass, where I've proposed some changes to make the article more accurate and up to date. More specifically, I've asked to correct language about the company's founding and remove a sentence which is not specifically confirmed by sourcing. Editor feedback has been limited, so I'm hoping some editors from WikiProject Media can take a look and update the article for me. Thanks! MC Alyssa (talk) 01:32, 14 January 2021 (UTC)
Hi there! I recently created this article, and I was curious if anyone wants to review it. I'm especially curious to see whether it meets notablility (I think it does, since I found several news stories about him, but I'm not sure), and how I can improve the writing style. Thanks! — Preceding unsigned comment added by Kokopelli7309 (talk • contribs) 14:00, 23 January 2021 (UTC)
FAR for Panavision
I have nominated Panavision for a featured article review here. Please join the discussion on whether this article meets featured article criteria. Articles are typically reviewed for two weeks. If substantial concerns are not addressed during the review period, the article will be moved to the Featured Article Removal Candidates list for a further period, where editors may declare "Keep" or "Delist" the article's featured status. The instructions for the review process are here. Z1720 (talk) 02:06, 27 January 2021 (UTC)
Requested move
It has been proposed that Clandestine press of the French Resistance be renamed to Underground media in German-occupied France. Your feedback would be welcome at this discussion. Thanks, Mathglot (talk) 21:35, 6 February 2021 (UTC)
One of your project's articles has been selected for improvement!
Hello, |
Kommersant has an RFC
Kommersant has an RFC for possible consensus. A discussion is taking place. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments on the discussion page. Thank you. — Mikehawk10 (talk) 06:28, 6 March 2021 (UTC)
Category:Media manipulation theorists has been nominated for merging to Category:Mass media theorists
Category:Media manipulation theorists has been nominated for merging to Category:Mass media theorists. A discussion is taking place to decide whether this proposal complies with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. Place Clichy (talk) 13:32, 11 May 2021 (UTC)
Most viewed start article in this Wikiproject
All-Russia State Television and Radio Broadcasting Company 164,257 5,475 Start--Coin945 (talk) 15:00, 30 May 2021 (UTC)
Scope, organization, and naming of pages related to Wide dynamic range
This is a notification to 6 relevant wikiprojects. Most of the talk page Talk:High dynamic range, though it seems like a long-running discussion, is only the last day or two since I discovered the renaming and other things going on there, much of which I reverted pending discussion. Please see and comment if this area interests you. Dicklyon (talk) 02:03, 11 June 2021 (UTC)
You are invited to join the discussion at Talk:Godi media § Semi-protected edit request on 28 July 2021. 122.179.87.96 (talk) 13:56, 29 July 2021 (UTC)
Discussion at Talk:Godi media § Photo request
You are invited to join the discussion at Talk:Godi media § Photo request. 122.179.87.96 (talk) 13:56, 29 July 2021 (UTC)
Wikidata proposal of potential interest to this project
A Wikidata property proposal regarding Media Bias/Fact Check is at Wikidata:Property_proposal/Media_Bias/Fact_Check_ID. --Animalparty! (talk) 17:09, 31 July 2021 (UTC)
RfC re: Ronan Farrow reporting at NBC News
There is an RfC at Talk:NBC News#Request for Comment NBC News Farrow Reporting that members of this project may be interested in. Please note I am a paid consultant to NBC News. BC1278 (talk) 15:34, 19 August 2021 (UTC)
Media studies template needs update
The contents of Template:Media_studies appears to be rather random. We need to re-evaluate which concepts, theories, works, etc. are most important. Many important topics are missing, while there are unimportant topics that can be removed. Agnerf (talk) 06:41, 31 August 2021 (UTC)
RSN discussion on The Times of India
There is an ongoing proposal at the reliable sources noticeboard regarding The Times of India. If you are interested, please participate at WP:RSN § Circular references from The Times of India. Tayi Arajakate Talk 15:52, 18 September 2021 (UTC)
Discussion at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Supriya Shrinate
You are invited to join the discussion at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Supriya Shrinate. Venkat TL (talk) 10:24, 5 December 2021 (UTC)
Requested move at Talk:High-dynamic-range video#Requested move 18 December 2021
There is a requested move discussion at Talk:High-dynamic-range video#Requested move 18 December 2021 that may be of interest to members of this WikiProject. — Shibbolethink (♔ ♕) 13:50, 27 December 2021 (UTC)
One of your project's articles has been selected for improvement!
Hello, |
Request on Raw Story page
Hi editors, my name is Nathalie at RS and I work for The Raw Story. I had made a request over at the Raw Story page and was wondering if anyone here would be willing to take a look at it since I am a COI editor and can't make any changes myself. I'd really appreciate it! Nathalie at RS (talk) 18:37, 20 January 2022 (UTC)
One of your project's articles has been selected for improvement!
Hello, |
I have nominated Nefarious: Merchant of Souls for a featured article review here. Please join the discussion on whether this article meets featured article criteria. Articles are typically reviewed for two weeks. If substantial concerns are not addressed during the review period, the article will be moved to the Featured Article Removal Candidates list for a further period, where editors may declare "Keep" or "Delist" the article's featured status. The instructions for the review process are here. GamerPro64 20:50, 19 February 2022 (UTC)
Requested move at Talk:Hotstar#Requested move 2 March 2022
There is a requested move discussion at Talk:Hotstar#Requested move 2 March 2022 that may be of interest to members of this WikiProject. 🐶 EpicPupper (he/him | talk) 03:56, 9 March 2022 (UTC), Adding WP Media to this. AngusW🐶🐶F (bark • sniff) 15:16, 9 March 2022 (UTC)
Requested move at Talk:Geo TV#Requested move 18 February 2022
There is a requested move discussion at Talk:Geo TV#Requested move 18 February 2022 that may be of interest to members of this WikiProject. 🐶 EpicPupper (he/him | talk) 18:44, 11 March 2022 (UTC)
One of your project's articles has been selected for improvement!
Hello, |
Players' Tribune Requests
Hi editors, I'm M and I work with Minute Media. I had made some requests over at The Players' Tribune Talk page and while they were initially implemented, they were later reverted due to some questions from another editor. I was hoping someone here might be willing to take another look at my requests, as I think they improve the page and help bring it more in compliance with Wikipedia rules. I know I can't make changes myself because of my conflict of interest, so I'd really appreciate any help you can offer! M at MinuteMedia (talk) 21:26, 13 April 2022 (UTC)
User script to detect unreliable sources
I have (with the help of others) made a small user script to detect and highlight various links to unreliable sources and predatory journals. Some of you may already be familiar with it, given it is currently the 39th most imported script on Wikipedia. The idea is that it takes something like
- John Smith "Article of things" Deprecated.com. Accessed 2020-02-14. (
John Smith "[https://www.deprecated.com/article Article of things]" ''Deprecated.com''. Accessed 2020-02-14.
)
and turns it into something like
- John Smith "Article of things" Deprecated.com. Accessed 2020-02-14.
It will work on a variety of links, including those from {{cite web}}, {{cite journal}} and {{doi}}.
The script is mostly based on WP:RSPSOURCES, WP:NPPSG and WP:CITEWATCH and a good dose of common sense. I'm always expanding coverage and tweaking the script's logic, so general feedback and suggestions to expand coverage to other unreliable sources are always welcomed.
Do note that this is not a script to be mindlessly used, and several caveats apply. Details and instructions are available at User:Headbomb/unreliable. Questions, comments and requests can be made at User talk:Headbomb/unreliable.
This is a one time notice and can't be unsubscribed from. Delivered by: MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 16:01, 29 April 2022 (UTC)
Category:Former Warner Bros. Discovery subsidiaries has been nominated for discussion
Category:Former Warner Bros. Discovery subsidiaries has been nominated for possible deletion, merging, or renaming. A discussion is taking place to decide whether this proposal complies with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. Nate • (chatter) 23:45, 30 April 2022 (UTC)
Importance of Julian Assange in WikiProject Media
In Talk:Julian_Assange#Wikiproject_interest I argue it should be high but if someone here could assess that would be good thanks. There's some related WikiProjects too that might be of interest. NadVolum (talk) 16:55, 14 June 2022 (UTC)
Broadcasters VS media personalities
What is the difference between Category:Broadcasters and Category:Media personalities? In both, the subcategories Category:Television personalities and Category:Radio personalities seem to contain most of the articles in the tree. Marcocapelle (talk) 17:00, 9 July 2022 (UTC)
RfC at List of best-selling music artists
There is an RfC currently open at Talk:List of best-selling music artists that would benefit from members of this WikiProject. Vladimir.copic (talk) 02:54, 19 August 2022 (UTC)
Requested move at Talk:Mediaweek (Australian magazine)#Requested move 13 August 2022
There is a requested move discussion at Talk:Mediaweek (Australian magazine)#Requested move 13 August 2022 that may be of interest to members of this WikiProject. – robertsky (talk) 18:09, 27 August 2022 (UTC)
We are a 100% subscriptions focused digital media company. Could you suggest improvements to our draft submission?
Hi, we are a subscriptions only digital media company called The Morning Context. I am the Editor of the publication and our draft was rejected considering my closeness with the subject, where I have declared the conflict of interest upfront. Could you help suggest improvements? Appreciate this. Thanks. AshishMishra1410 (talk) 05:52, 30 August 2022 (UTC)
Request for comment regarding Tudor Dixon
There is a request for comment at Talk:Tudor Dixon § Request for comment: sentence in lede that may interest members of this WikiProject. Please participate at the talk page. ––FormalDude (talk) 21:13, 29 October 2022 (UTC)
Priyamvada Gopal
Hello editors, I wondered if any colleagues who are more familiar with the works of Priyamvada Gopal than me, might be able to help expand the content on her academic research? This is as a result of a suggestion on the talk page on how to resolve some ongoing questions on how to present her profile in the media. Many thanks in advance Lajmmoore (talk) 09:19, 4 January 2023 (UTC)
Good article reassessment for Entertainment
Entertainment has been nominated for a good article reassessment. If you are interested in the discussion, please participate by adding your comments to the reassessment page. If concerns are not addressed during the review period, the good article status may be removed from the article. Onegreatjoke (talk) 14:38, 10 February 2023 (UTC)
Discussion at MFE - MediaForEurope
You are invited to join the discussion at Talk:MFE - MediaForEurope#MFE ≠ Mediaset (Italia S.p.A.), which is within the scope of this WikiProject. JSH-alive/talk/cont/mail 13:21, 29 March 2023 (UTC)
RfC on periodicals and publishing companies
This RfC can be found at Draft talk:Honest History (magazine) for discussion about notability requirements leading to bias toward older periodicals and publishers that published pages before the rules were updated. 04:08, 9 April 2023 (UTC) Stcksht (talk) 04:08, 9 April 2023 (UTC)
Working on an article on the ongoing bankruptcy of Diamond Sports Group
With the possibility of major changes in sports media, I thought it would be a good idea to work an article about Diamond Sports Group's ongoing bankruptcy. Help is appreciated! Draft:Bankruptcy of Diamond Sports Group. Esolo5002 (talk) 03:23, 4 May 2023 (UTC)
Talk:PragerU has an RFC
Talk:PragerU has an RFC for possible consensus. A discussion is taking place. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments on the discussion page. Thank you. ––FormalDude (talk) 17:33, 30 May 2023 (UTC)
La Patilla has an RFC
La Patilla has an RFC for possible consensus. A discussion is taking place. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments on the discussion page. Thank you. WMrapids (talk) 22:29, 5 July 2023 (UTC)
FAC of Communication
Hello, I wanted to let you know that I nominated the article Communication for featured article status, see Wikipedia:Featured article candidates/Communication/archive1. So far, there has not been much response from reviewers and I was wondering whether some of the editors here are inclined to have a look at it. If you have the time, I would appreciate your comments. For a short FAQ on the FA reviewing process, see Wikipedia:Wikipedia Signpost/2008-04-07/Dispatches. Phlsph7 (talk) 07:43, 13 October 2023 (UTC)
Rfc - Richard D. Gill and Kate Shemirani
There's an ongoing RfC at Talk:Richard D. Gill#Rfc - Kate Shemirani radio show appearance of relevance to this project. Structuralists (talk) 21:25, 2 November 2023 (UTC)
There is a requested move discussion at Talk:Disinformation in the 2023 Israel–Hamas war#Requested move 14 October 2023 that may be of interest to members of this WikiProject. Polyamorph (talk) 19:17, 12 November 2023 (UTC)
FAR for Digital media use and mental health
I have nominated Digital media use and mental health for a featured article review here. Please join the discussion on whether this article meets the featured article criteria. Articles are typically reviewed for two weeks. If substantial concerns are not addressed during the review period, the article will be moved to the Featured Article Removal Candidates list for a further period, where editors may declare "Keep" or "Delist" in regards to the article's featured status. The instructions for the review process are here. voorts (talk/contributions) 02:06, 24 November 2023 (UTC)
Not My Life Featured article review
I have nominated Not My Life for a featured article review here. Please join the discussion on whether this article meets the featured article criteria. Articles are typically reviewed for two weeks. If substantial concerns are not addressed during the review period, the article will be moved to the Featured Article Removal Candidates list for a further period, where editors may declare "Keep" or "Delist" in regards to the article's featured status. The instructions for the review process are here. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 21:41, 26 November 2023 (UTC)
Requested move at Talk:Colin MacKay (journalist, born 1944)#Requested move 6 January 2024
There is a requested move discussion at Talk:Colin MacKay (journalist, born 1944)#Requested move 6 January 2024 that may be of interest to members of this WikiProject. Vanderwaalforces (talk) 12:40, 6 January 2024 (UTC)
Requested move at Talk:History (American TV network)#Requested move 6 January 2024
There is a requested move discussion at Talk:History (American TV network)#Requested move 6 January 2024 that may be of interest to members of this WikiProject. Vanderwaalforces (talk) 19:36, 7 January 2024 (UTC)
Requested move at Talk:ABS-CBN News Channel#Requested move 30 January 2024
There is a requested move discussion at Talk:ABS-CBN News Channel#Requested move 30 January 2024 that may be of interest to members of this WikiProject. Vanderwaalforces (talk) 15:14, 30 January 2024 (UTC)
There is a requested move discussion at Talk:List of newspapers in the United States#Requested move 1 February 2024 that may be of interest to members of this WikiProject. Vanderwaalforces (talk) 22:31, 1 February 2024 (UTC)
Bad Bunny ft. CHENCHO CORLEONE (Video Musical)
Bad Bunny 186.7.184.212 (talk) 01:03, 21 May 2024 (UTC)
Proposed split of Criticism of the Walt Disney Company page
Hello everyone! I would like your input on a discussion at Talk:Criticism of the Walt Disney Company#Splitting off content to Criticism of Walt Disney Animation Studios about whether to split off content from five sub-sections about Walt Disney Animation Studios to the Criticism of Walt Disney Animation Studios, in order to ensure that the page complies with WP:SIZESPLIT. Consensus in this discussion is important to determine whether such a this split is warranted or not. Thanks and I hope to see your comments. Historyday01 (talk) 00:11, 1 February 2024 (UTC)
- Eladio Carrión ft. Bad Bunny - Kemba Walker (Audio Oficial) 186.7.184.212 (talk) 01:05, 21 May 2024 (UTC)