Talk:Blade & Soul

Korean Title

It is not 블래이드 앤 영혼 but 블래이드 앤 소울. Most game portals refer to the game with the latter.Ahablovesmoby (talk) 02:56, 6 August 2008 (UTC)

External links (fansites and other crap)

What's this page's policy going to be about fansite advertisements and such, a la external links? For the AION page they banned such links unless given very good reason (such as AionSource.com being obviously a valid link due to size, age, and content, etc.).

So? I'm removing links as I see them here, for the time being. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 65.80.244.47 (talk) 08:41, 6 August 2008 (UTC)

Well, Aion is already a known game and hundreds of fansites exist. B&S on the other hand only have a total of 2 established communities and one blog--which I maintain--that is the sole source of information in North American region. Even MMOsite's interview is taken from my blog without my permission. Leave them be for now. Later, we can weed out dying communities and leave a few.209.195.148.7 (talk) 04:11, 12 August 2008 (UTC)

AGAIN, LEAVE THE THREE UNOFFICIAL LINKS ALONE. ESPECIALLY THE BLOG. IT IS THE ONLY SOURCE OF INFORMATION ABOUT BLADE AND SOUL. CUT THE CRAP WITH BLIND LINK REMOVALS.Ahablovesmoby (talk) 16:22, 13 August 2008 (UTC)

I think it's only fair to leave the fansite links there as long as it's not spam sites. They're the only way the community can grow off and there's no reason to allow some while disallowing others, as time go by we can remove the ones that is no longer maintined while keeping the popular ones in-tact.

The blog be noted the most credit however - the owner actually did a lot of work and translation and provided much of the content those fansites are based off on. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 24.6.191.247 (talk) 10:42, 24 August 2008 (UTC)

PS3

This is NOT a PS3 game. No, the Sony/NCsoft exclusive deal has nothing to do with it. It may be ported to PS3, but it is currently not developed for PS3.Ahablovesmoby (talk) 11:37, 12 August 2008 (UTC)

Citation/References

mmosite is not a reliable source. Also, if you read the history, mmosite is trying to redirect traffic from the original source. [1]Ahablovesmoby (talk) 05:02, 24 December 2008 (UTC)

In one of the videos, if observed closely there are two Lyn characters healing/reviving a male Jin character who is lying down, a Healer/Priest job is hinted at then, right ? After all, we see the tentative Summoner and the Marksman jobs only in the videos......should the Healer also not be mentioned in the Article page ?

the Races section

The races of the game should not be covered in a separate category, but rather incorporated into the Gameplay section or Plot section. I invoke the WP:GAMECRUFT guideline, #5 and #6 specifically. Eik Corell (talk) 04:56, 20 April 2010 (UTC)

ps3

the Blade and Soul Playstation 3 version is confirmed by NCSoft Korea — Preceding unsigned comment added by 83.160.165.52 (talk) 10:56, 23 November 2011 (UTC)

Chinese server status

The chinese server just entered another beta phase, and should not have a "release date" in the past. --Kgptzac (talk) 22:17, 31 October 2013 (UTC)

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 external links on Blade & Soul. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20120917001939/http://us.bladeandsoul.com/en/news/press/press_release.php to http://us.bladeandsoul.com/en/news/press/press_release.php/
• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20120916201308/http://us.bladeandsoul.com/en/faq/ to http://us.bladeandsoul.com/en/faq/

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

• If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
• If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 16:07, 21 July 2017 (UTC)