That will result in the following banner (which lets other editors know that you're working on it):

Add a Section called Pros and Cons

edit

I would like to add a sections to the Citizen Oversight Wikipedia pros and cons of oversight boards Mep71 (talk) 23:42, 3 December 2014 (UTC)Reply

Citizen oversight

edit

I would like to add other terms that are interchangeable for Citizen Oversight. Citizen oversight can also be referred to as civilian or external oversight.

Added alternative wording, some oversight boards do refer to themselves as Civilian instead, but I have failed to find any that use a name other than the two already listed. --HoadRog (talk) 10:13, 23 June 2019 (UTC)Reply

Add section Justification for oversight

edit

== Add section Justification for oversight == I would like to add information about why citizen oversight has become so important. I am thinking about adding information misconduct in the private and public sector which have resulted in increased involvement. I also found some inform that support that citizen oversight occurs when there are problem like Enron. Citizen want to have an impact and fix problems.

edit

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Citizen oversight. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 06:43, 8 August 2017 (UTC)Reply

Wiki Education assignment: International and Comparative Public Management

edit

  This article was the subject of a Wiki Education Foundation-supported course assignment, between 26 January 2022 and 14 May 2022. Further details are available on the course page. Student editor(s): Jameson.dimaio (article contribs). Peer reviewers: Brestaino, PeaceProsperityDemocracy.

— Assignment last updated by PeaceProsperityDemocracy (talk) 13:44, 18 July 2022 (UTC)Reply

The added information is all about civilian control of militaries. I am going to move that to a separate article -- Civilian control of the military -- rather than have it interwoven in this and I will move this article to "Civilian oversight of law enforcement" BCorr|Брайен 14:33, 8 November 2022 (UTC)Reply

Proposed merge of Civilian police oversight agency into Civilian oversight of law enforcement

edit

These two pages cover the same topic and mention the same things. Civilian oversight of law enforcement seems like a better destination, since it's older and has fewer cleanup issues. Apocheir (talk) 18:00, 11 May 2023 (UTC)Reply

i second this. how does it happen? DoctorKarpiak (talk) 17:15, 20 September 2023 (UTC)Reply
    Y Merger complete. Klbrain (talk) 17:16, 18 November 2023 (UTC)Reply
@DoctorKarpiak: for information, any editor can do this once a consensus is reached (or, at least, no objections, having given enough time for comment). You can see the procedure at WP:MERGING. Please do feel free to edit/improve the combined page, as I do these rather simply, and the input of subject experts such as yourself is more valuable than that of generalists. Klbrain (talk) 17:16, 18 November 2023 (UTC)Reply